My point was... you're essentially complaining about guys wearing skimpy clothing. I was trying to point out that when someone else complains about girls wearing skimpy clothing, there's a huge outcry and disapproval of the complainer. But who is defending boys' rights to choose their clothing style; in this particular instance?
I admit, I don't know your position on that, but there was a certain smell of hypocrisy and double standard in the air.
As far as I'm aware though nobody is arguing, or has ever argued, that men wearing cock-showing trousers deserve to get raped and have only themselves to blame when they do get raped. The main argument anyone makes with men's cocks and balls on display however is that it's disgusting rather than immoral. Like how, for example, somone walking around with a giant boil on their face is disgusting but not immoral.
Not that all people who complain about scantaly clad women are all making that argument, but the fact that some people do make said argument has made people rather sensitive about the subject.
Plus there is the added difference that most skimpy women's clothes don't show off reproductive organs, what with female reproductive organs being internal and all that. When a girl wears a tight, short skirt nobody is going to see her ovaries and its unlikely you'll see her vagina. Where as with a man in certain tight short shorts you can see both his cock and his balls. Nobody wants to see that, much in the same way nobody wants to see your liver, kidneys, spleen, intestines, brain, etc. It's just nasty.
