Dumbest Protest Signs

[R. U. Sirius]

Because he didn't start hating them until they killed his son. Duh.

[kefkaownsall]

Is that WBC or just an asshole

[Osama bin Bambi]

Is that WBC or just an asshole

The signs in that style, with the fugly florescent gradient background and the big block letters, are definitely WBC's trademark.

[Vypernight]

I'm waiting for someone to hold up a sign that says, "God hates stupid signs!"

[Cataclysm]

If God hates Jews, then why was his son one?

He might be referring to the religion rather than the ethnicity.

[davedan]

Yeah but Jesus was jewish both by religion and ethnicity.

[nickiknack]

[ScrappyB]

You know, he's either awfully brave or awfully stupid to wear that shirt while riding a motorcycle. I know I'd be fighting the temptation to rear end him.

[erictheblue]

You know, he's either awfully brave or awfully stupid to wear that shirt while riding a motorcycle. I know I'd be fighting the temptation to rear end him.

If you do, you would be faulted for the accident and it would be your insurance that goes up. And you'd have to pay his medical bills

[chad sexington]

Wouldn't he be found at fault for not wearing safety gear, though?

[DiscoBerry]

Well, if he's volunteering to do it himself, I say let him go!  The Israelis and Palestinians like a laugh as much as anyone else!

Anyone know where this pic was taken?  Because I have this funny feeling that the number of actual Jewish people in this demonstration is rather low. 

[ScrappyB]

You know, he's either awfully brave or awfully stupid to wear that shirt while riding a motorcycle. I know I'd be fighting the temptation to rear end him.

If you do, you would be faulted for the accident and it would be your insurance that goes up. And you'd have to pay his medical bills

I know. Not saying I'd actually do it, but I'd be thinking about it.

[rookie]

If you do, you would be faulted for the accident and it would be your insurance that goes up. And you'd have to pay his medical bills

It takes an awful lot for the motorcyclist to catch the at fault. true, it does happen, but if there is any doubt at all, usually it goes to the car.

[Barbarella]

Wouldn't he be found at fault for not wearing safety gear, though?

I'll let nature take it's course. I assume he's a rowdy type....he'll ride stupidly one day & crack his coconut on the pavement.

[erictheblue]

Wouldn't he be found at fault for not wearing safety gear, though?

Depends on the state. Not all states have helmet laws, and there is no requirement anywhere that I know of that requires any other gear. I've seen people on sport bikes wearing shorts, a t-shirt, and tennis shoes, going 80 mph (129 kpm).

Most states do have laws that reduce liability based on percentage of fault. In the case of the picture, if a fact-finder (judge or jury) decided the rider was 30% at fault because he was riding without protective gear, his award would be reduced by 30%. However, even if the fact-finder finds the biker was 99% at fault, the driver would still owe the biker 1% of medical bills. (There is no way to determine the biker is 100% at fault since the driver did rear-end the biker.) A few states have laws that say if the plaintiff is more than 50% at fault, they recover nothing, but not many.