Your hero Winston Churchill never took responsibility for his war crimes in India. Seems a mite hypocritical for you to say someone far less guilty of criminal activity should do so.
Nice attempt at deflection.
But back to the subject at hand.
Wikileaks exposes one of the major parties in an election cycle in a major western democracy essentially curating the election coverage of a number of the biggest mainstream press outlets in the country. It is alleged that the leak of this information comes from Russian sources.
Do you:
a) welcome the information as it exposes a genuine threat to the free press.
or
b) shriek about Russian intrusion and go try to bury any outlet that mentions it (you know, all those "war on fake news" articles, simultaneously bigging up the "independent" mainstream media...).
I'm only really seeing (b) from the left at the moment. I don't like to overuse references to Orwell, but we're getting there at this point.
