So, going with his conclusions here, If I were to walk up and hit him hard enough to leave him with no memory of the event and in a coma long enough for the damage to heal, then he's suffered no perceptable injury? Notably, I live close enough to take this up with him personally.You wouldn't even have to go that far. Just ask him if the handkerchief you're carrying smells like chloroform. Then, whatever happens happens.
I go with the phsyical hit just to point out that perception of something doesn't shape the whole reality of a situtation. There are concerns well beyond immediate perception that go along with such an activity. But this guy's arguing about fucking property rights, so he's probably not worth the time.So, going with his conclusions here, If I were to walk up and hit him hard enough to leave him with no memory of the event and in a coma long enough for the damage to heal, then he's suffered no perceptable injury? Notably, I live close enough to take this up with him personally.You wouldn't even have to go that far. Just ask him if the handkerchief you're carrying smells like chloroform. Then, whatever happens happens.
I wonder how he'd feel if I pissed on his mother's grave, posted pictures on the net, and told all his friends and colleagues about it.
It's not like I did anything more than water the grass right?
Or maybe a copious amount of semen on the hood and door handles of his car would get the point across better. Hell, I'd even leave a twenty under the wiper to pay for the car wash so he had nothing to complain about.
If we shot him in the head, I doubt he'd remember that.
If we shot him in the head, I doubt he'd remember that.
I don't think he'd remember much of anything.
If we shot him in the head, I doubt he'd remember that.
I don't think he'd remember much of anything.
Because he would be dead.
"As long as I’m safely unconsious and therefore shielded from the costs of an assault, why shouldn’t the rest of the world (or more specifically my attackers) be allowed to reap the benefits?"
What I want to do to this guy:
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8p1seSf3l1qzqnxxo1_500.gif)
What I want to do to this guy:
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8p1seSf3l1qzqnxxo1_500.gif)
Um a little off topic but was that gif from Akira?
What I want to do to this guy:
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8p1seSf3l1qzqnxxo1_500.gif)
Um a little off topic but was that gif from Akira?
Oh, and apparently this isn't the first time he's proven himself to be a complete shithead. He also jumped on the Sandra Fluke hate-train (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/16/steve-landsburg-rochester-university-professor-rush-limbaugh_n_1353319.html), thinks people should stop voting (http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2004/09/dont_vote.html), and believes the poor should be unplugged from life support (http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2006/01/do_the_poor_deserve_life_support.html).Honestly, I don't care about the non-voting part; I don't vote either. The rest of it is trash.
Oh, and apparently this isn't the first time he's proven himself to be a complete shithead. He also jumped on the Sandra Fluke hate-train (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/16/steve-landsburg-rochester-university-professor-rush-limbaugh_n_1353319.html), thinks people should stop voting (http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2004/09/dont_vote.html), and believes the poor should be unplugged from life support (http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2006/01/do_the_poor_deserve_life_support.html).
I go with the phsyical hit just to point out that perception of something doesn't shape the whole reality of a situtation. There are concerns well beyond immediate perception that go along with such an activity. But this guy's arguing about fucking property rights, so he's probably not worth the time.So, going with his conclusions here, If I were to walk up and hit him hard enough to leave him with no memory of the event and in a coma long enough for the damage to heal, then he's suffered no perceptable injury? Notably, I live close enough to take this up with him personally.You wouldn't even have to go that far. Just ask him if the handkerchief you're carrying smells like chloroform. Then, whatever happens happens.
I... what? I can't even begin to understand the mental gymnastics this guy must have used for such an out there conclusion.
I... what? I can't even begin to understand the mental gymnastics this guy must have used for such an out there conclusion.
Sometimes I wonder if people who make these arguments or get really defensive about this subject have either thought about, or have actually done something like this, and are trying desperately hard to convince themselves (and others) that this behavior is understandable and that they're not actually horrible people, rapists, or rape apologists.
I would like to know if this guy thinks people should be allowed to sexually abuse babies.
The baby isn't going to remember it, so according to his logic why shouldn't we let people enjoy them as long as they are careful not to cause physical harm?
So, going with his conclusions here, If I were to walk up and hit him hard enough to leave him with no memory of the event and in a coma long enough for the damage to heal, then he's suffered no perceptable injury? Notably, I live close enough to take this up with him personally.