I got to 11 minutes. Here's the transcript of what I heard. http://pastebin.com/riezF26Z
Couldn't watch the video, but I did skim the transcript a little. His definitions of evolution are so incredibly stupid I couldn't go any further than that.
92 elements? Goddamn, how far behind are you? When I was in grade school in the 60's, we learned then there were 102 elements. And now, with the discovery of more elements, the periodic table is up to around 118.
Never seen stars form? Hell, yeah, they have. Star formation in every stage of development has been observed. And, generally, a star has to be super-massive to go nova or supernova. We're talking hundreds to thousands of times larger than our sun. That means that several smaller stars could be formed from the remnants of a super-nova. Smaller stars like our sun will usually go through a red giant stage when it runs out of fuel, then collapse in on itself to form a white dwarf. No explosion involved. Get it right, dipshit.
But the bits about micro- and macro-evolution are the toppings on this moron cake. At least he does admit that micro-evolution occurs. What is so maddening is that he and others like him cannot or will not for the life of them understand that continued micro-changes in a species leads to macro-evolution. The bit about rocks turning into dogs or that a dog has never given birth to a different animal are two of those
moments. Evolution theory does not now nor has it ever said anything like this. Life came from organic compounds, not inorganic materials like a rock.
I could rant a lot more about this, but I won't. Shit like this would be funny if it weren't for that he actually thinks it's true. And what's even sadder is that the people he is telling it too don't know any better and believe it, also. Former science teacher, my ass. He wouldn't know true science if you beat over the head with a big bag of it.