FSTDT Forums

Community => Science and Technology => Topic started by: Nightangel8212 on March 16, 2012, 03:31:34 pm

Title: New Species of Human found in China?
Post by: Nightangel8212 on March 16, 2012, 03:31:34 pm
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/mysterious-chinese-fossils-may-human-species-150805074.html

...not alive and running around, obviously, but.... fossilized remains that are unlike any that scientists have seen before. These people resided in caves and their diets consisted mostly of Red Deer.

Be wary of the comments. Many of them are facepalm worthy.
Title: Re: New Species of Human found in China?
Post by: Cataclysm on March 16, 2012, 04:13:37 pm
I haven't seen any creationist comments so far, that's good.
Title: Re: New Species of Human found in China?
Post by: SimSim on March 16, 2012, 04:47:54 pm
Surprising how late they lived considering they had so many archaic features. Died out about 11,500 ago, so right about the time the last ice age ended and agriculture started taking off.

Also interesting is that means there were 4 overlapping species of humans living in Asia at the same time. Modern humans, Neanderthals, Denisovians(sp?), and now these people.

I'll have to attempt to read the journal article this weekend.
Title: Re: New Species of Human found in China?
Post by: gyeonghwa on March 16, 2012, 07:50:48 pm
Surprising how late they lived considering they had so many archaic features. Died out about 11,500 ago, so right about the time the last ice age ended and agriculture started taking off.

Also interesting is that means there were 4 overlapping species of humans living in Asia at the same time. Modern humans, Neanderthals, Denisovians(sp?), and now these people.

I'll have to attempt to read the journal article this weekend.

There is speculations that Homo floresiensis may have been contemporary with early Homo Sapien. That would make five groups.
Title: Re: New Species of Human found in China?
Post by: SimSim on March 16, 2012, 08:09:44 pm
That's interesting, I hadn't heard that before. With how interesting I found this stuff I wish I had learned more about biological and paleoanthropology than historical archaeology.