Quinnspiracy

[Beezlebub]

Honestly the detractors should focus on her actual manipulation, and not her (alleged) sleeping around.

Seriously, this isn't the tabloids....

[RavynousHunter]

So, little Madman gets the joy of his own personal pissing contest.  By the pig, I wish I had some booze to watch this shit with...best I got is a Rockstar.

[Ultimate Paragon]

Just by being affiliated with Breitbart.com, named after a man who deliberately edited shit and has spread lies that are still believed to this day despite being ten times debunked, everything they present is automatically suspect.

Photoshop exists.

You know who else is a proven liar?  Anita.

And let's not forget the hypocrisy of gaming journalism.  Despite their demands for more diversity and calling gamers intolerant, gaming journalism is full of white male cishets.

https://medium.com/@cainejw/on-diversity-in-games-media-245336e7c50

Hey, morons.  Maybe you should practice what you preach.

[Witchyjoshy]

Just by being affiliated with Breitbart.com, named after a man who deliberately edited shit and has spread lies that are still believed to this day despite being ten times debunked, everything they present is automatically suspect.

Photoshop exists.

You know who else is a proven liar?  Anita.

A proven liar about what?

If it's about the police report thing, all we've got to go on is that guy's word and an image HE posted.

[Ultimate Paragon]

Just by being affiliated with Breitbart.com, named after a man who deliberately edited shit and has spread lies that are still believed to this day despite being ten times debunked, everything they present is automatically suspect.

Photoshop exists.

You know who else is a proven liar?  Anita.

A proven liar about what?

If it's about the police report thing, all we've got to go on is that guy's word and an image HE posted.

Well, let's see:

1. She conned people out of their money on Kickstarter.

2. She stole footage for her web series.

3. She claims to be a lifelong gamer when she's not.

4. She misrepresents the games she talks about.

And it's a crying shame, because in my book, this kind of thing really needs to be talked about.

[Second Coming of Madman]

Just by being affiliated with Breitbart.com, named after a man who deliberately edited shit and has spread lies that are still believed to this day despite being ten times debunked, everything they present is automatically suspect.

Photoshop exists.

You know who else is a proven liar?  Anita.

A proven liar about what?

If it's about the police report thing, all we've got to go on is that guy's word and an image HE posted.

Well, let's see:

1. She conned people out of their money on Kickstarter.

2. She stole footage for her web series.

3. She claims to be a lifelong gamer when she's not.

4. She misrepresents the games she talks about.

We're not getting into this debate again, UP. Leave me out of this.

[Witchyjoshy]

Just by being affiliated with Breitbart.com, named after a man who deliberately edited shit and has spread lies that are still believed to this day despite being ten times debunked, everything they present is automatically suspect.

Photoshop exists.

You know who else is a proven liar?  Anita.

A proven liar about what?

If it's about the police report thing, all we've got to go on is that guy's word and an image HE posted.

Well, let's see:

1. She conned people out of their money on Kickstarter.

2. She stole footage for her web series.

3. She claims to be a lifelong gamer when she's not.

4. She misrepresents the games she talks about.

And it's a crying shame, because in my book, this kind of thing really needs to be talked about.

1. What was all that about anyways?

2. Bad, yes, but that doesn't make her a liar.

3. [citation needed]

4. How so?

Bearing in mind that even if all of the above is true, I'd put more value in her word than anyone affiliated with Breitbart.

@Madman

He wasn't including you to begin with, he was responding to me.

What the hell is wrong with you anyways?  You jump all over me and Ironbite because you thought we were responding to a different issue from the one we were actually responding to, and now you're taking someone else's response to me very personally.

[Ironchew]

[I am lizard]

Admin, plz ban ironchew.

[Askold]

Admin, plz ban ironchew.

[Danarth]

Same shit, different day.

A woman dares tread on the precious territory of the male gamer and suddenly she becomes the worst villian ever.

Male producers, critics, reviewers and random entities get involved in something of a even a remotely similiar nature, the blow out is 'nothing' by comparison. I have no doubt if a male developer was to sleep with a female reviewer, then suddenly it would be the female reviewers fault.

There is a set of over priveleged, whiney male gamers who have never gotten beyond the girls are icky and want to ruin our fun stage.

 It needs to stop. It's stupid, pathetic and completely counter-productive.

[RavynousHunter]

Same shit, different day.

A woman dares tread on the precious territory of the male gamer and suddenly she becomes the worst villian ever.

Male producers, critics, reviewers and random entities get involved in something of a even a remotely similiar nature, the blow out is 'nothing' by comparison. I have no doubt if a male developer was to sleep with a female reviewer, then suddenly it would be the female reviewers fault.

There is a set of over priveleged, whiney male gamers who have never gotten beyond the girls are icky and want to ruin our fun stage.

 It needs to stop. It's stupid, pathetic and completely counter-productive.

Yes, because trading a shag for a good review is totally the same as pathetic schoolyard bullshit, and not in any way indicative of a larger problem in journalism in general.

[Danarth]

Well, when this particular set of male gamers stop acting like they are in the schoolyard, then maybe I will stop using that comparison?

As for your second point, yes, I absolutely agree that there is a larger issue at hand with the gaming media and review 'industry', My point stands that, if a male reviewer/developer/shill were to do something similar, they would not get anything like the same amount of flak, because of the previously mentioned group of male gamers who don't want to share their toys with the girls.

They no doubt represent a minority of the community, but minorities like this always project their voices in the loudest, most obnoxious fashion, which gives them far more representation than they should have.

[I am lizard]

The shagging is alleged from what I can tell, and even if it was real it never amounted to anything besides a passing mention of her.

I do agree with game journalism being corrupt.

[I am lizard]

Just by being affiliated with Breitbart.com, named after a man who deliberately edited shit and has spread lies that are still believed to this day despite being ten times debunked, everything they present is automatically suspect.

Photoshop exists.

You know who else is a proven liar?  Anita.

A proven liar about what?

If it's about the police report thing, all we've got to go on is that guy's word and an image HE posted.

Well, let's see:

1. She conned people out of their money on Kickstarter.

2. She stole footage for her web series.

3. She claims to be a lifelong gamer when she's not.

4. She misrepresents the games she talks about.

And it's a crying shame, because in my book, this kind of thing really needs to be talked about.

Could you source 1 plz?