ISideWith

[tygerarmy]

[nickiknack]

Though apparently I agree with Romney on science issues because I think Space and Stem cell research should have more private incentives.

I really don't care how it's funded as long as it's funded, it's the whole "OMG YOU'RE KILLING FUTURE BABIES" bs that annoys me.

[Material Defender]

Though apparently I agree with Romney on science issues because I think Space and Stem cell research should have more private incentives.

I really don't care how it's funded as long as it's funded, it's the whole "OMG YOU'RE KILLING FUTURE BABIES" bs that annoys me.

I think it has a lot of potential, but it's not dug very deep due to that crap. Mostly I'm confused due to how it was explained to me (Back in Catholic school) in which they supported most stem cell research, except embryonic. Just trying to remember it confuses me. Though I'm not expecting instant science magic with it either like I've heard some poorly informed people proclaim.

Embryonic is the only sort that has any relation to the pro-lifers. There are other stem cells, like placental and adult. Which has no opposition. At least by catholics.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Jill Stein. Not that it matters, given the whole not-being-an-American-citizen thing.

[Random Gal]

The only thing I really agreed with Romney on was immigration, but that was because the only questions on the site were about treatment of illegal immigrants. While I don't support the idea of making illegal immigrants citizens or anything like that, I do think it should be easier for people to immigrate legally, which would reduce the number of illegal immigrants and cut down on the problem. There were no options that would have allowed me to express this view, however.

[Witchyjoshy]

Random, I think you can actually make your own options, but it reduces the accuracy of the results.

Also, I'm pretty sure you can actually choose more options, because I remember what you said being an option.

I could be wrong, though.

[RinellaWasHere]

Can they make a UK version?

[nickiknack]

And the "pro-lifers" are too stupid to realize that most of  the embryos are just sitting there going to waste for the most part, rather then being used in some shape or form. I'll rather it not go to waste, if it's not going to be a future child, why not use it for some good.

[Material Defender]

And the "pro-lifers" are too stupid to realize that most of  the embryos are just sitting there going to waste for the most part, rather then being used in some shape or form. I'll rather it not go to waste, if it's not going to be a future child, why not use it for some good.

Why I agree with the assessment to use them. Cost/gain says use them. Potential future child<Gains for living kinetic humans

[m52nickerson]

Okay, anyone surprised by this?

[Veras]

Stein 96% (domestic policy, social, economic, foreign policy, healthcare, science, environmental, and immigration issues)

Obama 81% (social, foreign policy, science, environmental, and immigration)

Anderson 78% (social, healthcare, environmental, and immigration)

Johnson 62% (social, domestic, science, and immigration)

Romney 2%

Goode 0%

[Igor]

Can they make a UK version?

Canadian version'd be nice too.

[armandtanzarian]

Can they make a UK version?

I'm gonna guess the default answer will be "I side with committing mass murder because David Milliband is such an limpdick the country is better off as a nuclear wasteland."

[Shano]

I feel like I am furthest to the left here...
http://www.isidewith.com/results/182946621
in particular while I side very strongly with Jill (94%), I seem to be sharing the least (next best 74%) with any of the other candidates.