I can do that!....I think your right, but I'll go a step farther, I think we should be able to not only opt out of the financial burden but parents should have the right to kill their children at any age without retribution. I mean if were all 100% for a mothers right to kill a baby, and your advocating the fathers right not to be burdened with this responsibility, I think he should have the right to kill his child too, at any age, as soon as that baby comes out its fair game and he should be able to stick one of those metal straws in the back of its skull and suck its brains out.......I can only imagine a world that takes so little stock in the value of life, buts its your perfect world I imagine........I would imagine the killing of babies not be the only place this society would find a need to eliminate people, I would imagine mentally challanged would be next, as they appear to be a financial burden on everyone, then as soon as an old person could nolonger greet people at Walmart they would be sent to the exit program, probably a well designed retirement facility that would help them exit our world in a quick mannor
Reply With Quote
This argument, and any variation of it, can go fuck itself in the ass with a cactus that has rusted nails imbedded in it until it's shove so far in that it comes out of its mouth. This includes the "Pro-choicers/deathers should be applauding this" and "She was just practicing her right to choose" comments you find in news stories where a child dies, especially if they're murdered by a parent.
Anti-choicers and forced birthers think this straw argument holds water even though it's been refuted almost every time it pops up. It's like the "I guess the homo-advocates are just fine with people marrying animals and children" argument. It's a reasonable argument for them because that's how they seriously view the world, even though the actual position that they're arguing against has refuted it time and again with specific reasons why the argument doesn't work. This argument even ignores the fact that many pro-choicers are against late term abortions where the fetus is viable, except for for extreme case like health risks.
Come to think of it, what makes this argument especially ironic is that while these pro-lifers believe that pro-choicers would have no problem killing actual born children, there are those among them who have no problem with grown women dying by being forced to carry fetuses that their bodies are incapable of carrying without great risk.
