FSTDT Forums

Community => Entertainment and Television => Topic started by: Ultimate Paragon on May 23, 2014, 02:58:35 pm

Title: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on May 23, 2014, 02:58:35 pm
Just thought I'd make this seeing all the conversations about Star Wars.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 23, 2014, 03:07:56 pm
Yeah, this was a good idea.  Thanks, UP.

Aye, Episode VII does sound like its got plenty of potential.  Any movie that doesn't have Yoda being either a semi-sane old coot or an overly pious arse is welcome.

It's funny, because he's actually got kind of a hidden mischevious streak to him, at least according to the Clone Wars.  If he was more like that, then he'd be a good character.

Eventually, we're finally gonna get some answers on his backstory whenever DisneyLucasarts gets around to releasing the special on him.  Fans are mixed about this, I for one think it could actually redeem his character.

I won't know until I see it.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on May 23, 2014, 10:25:46 pm
Yeah, this was a good idea.  Thanks, UP.

Aye, Episode VII does sound like its got plenty of potential.  Any movie that doesn't have Yoda being either a semi-sane old coot or an overly pious arse is welcome.

It's funny, because he's actually got kind of a hidden mischevious streak to him, at least according to the Clone Wars.  If he was more like that, then he'd be a good character.

Eventually, we're finally gonna get some answers on his backstory whenever DisneyLucasarts gets around to releasing the special on him.  Fans are mixed about this, I for one think it could actually redeem his character.

I won't know until I see it.

The original script for "The Empire Strikes Back" had a training montage that included Yoda teaching Luke that super-jump he used in Cloud City by sitting on high branch and holding Luke's lightsaber for him to try and jump up and grab. His act when first meeting Luke was also a persona he adopted with anyone he encountered over the years on Dagobah, both to convince them he wasn't worth bothering and (I think) just for fun.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on May 24, 2014, 04:58:06 am
I kind of feel sorry vfor JJ Abrams as he's being blamed, by people on Twitter and FB, for both only casting one female character and the loss of the EU.  First, there's always been only one main female character.  And second, Abrams had nothing to do with the EU being rendered non-canon.  Why don't they blame him for the moving not starting with the Fox Fanfare while they're at it!
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 24, 2014, 07:17:19 am
Because, clearly, JJ Abrams is behind everything bad in movies ever.  People are likely still butthurt about the recent Star Trek films.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 24, 2014, 11:45:38 am
Also, fairly certain that the only EU that was lost was the EU after episode 6, which was an absolute necessity.  Not to mention, the canonity of EU has ALWAYS been on the verge of being retconned because of Lucas' tiers of canonity Movies > TV > Games > Books (Comic or Novel)

At least I think that was the tiers.

Also, JJ Abrams is a Star Wars fanboy.  He may not have done the greatest job with the Star Trek reboot (Though I would point out that being a Star Wars fanboy does NOT exclude you from being a Star Trek fan) but he most certainly is interested in doing his best with Star Wars.

...Come to think of it, I'm suddenly realizing that he was probably a kid when Star Wars came out, and grew up with it.  And now he's working on a new movie.

I'm happy for him.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Cloud3514 on May 25, 2014, 11:50:41 pm
At least I think that was the tiers.

Nope, it's far more idiotic and convoluted than that:

G-Canon (George Lucas Canon): The movies.
T-Canon (Television Canon): The Clone Wars (which always annoyed me because it arbitrarily went out of the way to contradict things from lower tiers for no good reason)
C-Canon (Comics Canon): Anything that isn't directly contradicted by the above tiers. Almost everything is in here.
S-Canon (Semi-Canon): Anything that IS contradicted by the above, but not completely.
N-Canon (Non-Canon): Self-explanatory.

And I really don't know why people are freaking out over the changes because Star Wars canon has always been fragile at best with Lucas being on record of hating most of it and going out of his way to arbitrarily contradict other stories with his preferred ideas. The completely pointless and inexplicable name change of Korriban to Moribund, anyone?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 26, 2014, 12:16:25 am
It's not like it's unheard of for planets to have multiple names though.

Earth/Terra anyone?

That being said, the tenuous canon is an excellent point, one I've actually been making in my poking at enraged fanboys.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on May 26, 2014, 12:24:27 am
My only contribution to this thread is with the loss of the EU, we lose the X-Wing series.

Ironbite-and the biggest baddass stick jocky to ever climb into an X-Wing cockpit.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: m52nickerson on May 26, 2014, 12:25:26 am
Abrams might do a good job here as the Star Trek movies felt more like Star War movies.  Of course that is the problem with the new Trek movies.

As for the EU, I'm glad it is being killed.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 26, 2014, 12:29:47 am
My only contribution to this thread is with the loss of the EU, we lose the X-Wing series.

Ironbite-and the biggest baddass stick jocky to ever climb into an X-Wing cockpit.

The only characters I'll miss are Kyle Katarn and Jaden.

Though as it turns out, just because the EU is no longer canon doesn't mean the Dark Forces and Jedi Academy games have spontaneously vanished.

As for the EU, I'm glad it is being killed.

That's an interesting viewpoint.  I disagree with it, but I also like it.  Weird.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Cloud3514 on May 26, 2014, 12:42:45 am
I'm sad that the EU is going away, but I still agree with the decision. Why should we expect Abrams to dig through 20 years of continuity?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on May 26, 2014, 12:51:43 am
Was it Abrams' decision to get rid of the EU? I would think that a decision like that woul come from higher up in the Disney management.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 26, 2014, 12:52:15 am
Not to mention that not even the EU can agree on what happened directly after Episode 6, considering even the books contradict each other sometimes.

There are some elements that I want to see kept in Episode 7/8/9, though.  Palpatine having clones of himself, Luke temporarily becoming "Luke Vader" in an attempt to destroy the Sith from within, Kyle Katarn and Jaden...

But at the same time, I'm just happy that we're getting something new and concrete.  And Mark Hamill believes that Star Wars is in good hands - and if Mark Hamill likes it, I can give it a shot.

Was it Abrams' decision to get rid of the EU? I would think that a decision like that woul come from higher up in the Disney management.

...You know what, I'm not actually sure...
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Cloud3514 on May 26, 2014, 01:02:45 am
At the very least, Disney can't do any worse than the prequels.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 26, 2014, 01:05:51 am
All I know is, no matter how good the movie actually is, there will be 50 dozen people complaining that it's the worst thing ever made.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on May 26, 2014, 02:10:31 am
All I know is, no matter how good the movie actually is, there will be 50 dozen people complaining that it's the worst thing ever made.

Even 50 thousand is still a low estimate of the complainers.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on May 26, 2014, 05:58:56 am
Was it Abrams' decision to get rid of the EU? I would think that a decision like that woul come from higher up in the Disney management.

I'm pretty sure Abrams had nothing to do with the decision.  He's just getting blamed for it. 

As for the EU, I'm going to miss the X Wing series (especially Wes Janson and Wraith Squadron) and the Thrawn Trilogy, but I'm sure we'll see little tidbits here and there.  I'm definitely glad to see pretty much every thing else gone.  NJO was okay, but I did not like LOTF and hated FOTJ.  I know people are huge fans of those and that's fine.  But as far as I'm concerned, good riddance.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on May 26, 2014, 10:42:29 am
I wonder if Abrams should get some kind of "Slayer of Canon" award for killing off not only the Star Wars EU but also the entire Star Trek canon minus Enterprise?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 26, 2014, 03:38:15 pm
I wonder if Abrams should get some kind of "Slayer of Canon" award for killing off not only the Star Wars EU but also the entire Star Trek canon minus Enterprise?

You mean the canon that's confirmed to still exist because his movies literally take place in another dimension which has actually crossed with the main canon at one point?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on May 26, 2014, 04:42:47 pm
Depends on how one interprets the effects of time travel. Usually, when one alters a timeline like that, the previous timeline ceases to exist though. At least, that's the interpretation most commonly used in Star Trek.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 26, 2014, 04:53:07 pm
Depends on how one interprets the effects of time travel. Usually, when one alters a timeline like that, the previous timeline ceases to exist though. At least, that's the interpretation most commonly used in Star Trek.

And that's an assumption.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Canadian Mojo on May 26, 2014, 04:56:43 pm
Was it Abrams' decision to get rid of the EU? I would think that a decision like that woul come from higher up in the Disney management.
Are you suggesting that a souless bean counter decided to kill off all the elements of the Star Wars franchise that they don't own and hit the re-set button thereby ensuring that Disney maintains absolute financial and developmental control from this point onward as well as doing a pretty good job of cutting off at the knees any potential claims of intellectual copyright infringement on Disney's part?  ;)

I'm guessing when you spend $4.05 billion on something you've got to milk it for all its worth.

Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on May 26, 2014, 05:00:32 pm
I suppose one could go with the Legend of Zelda approach where altering the timeline just creates a second parallel timeline coexisting simultaneously with the previous one, which seems to be what the writers suggested. I don't remember that occurring anywhere else in Star Trek though. Indeed, "City on the Edge of Forever," "Yesterday's Enterprise," "Past Tense," First Contact, etc. all use the single-timeline model.

But then, why is the Star Wars Expanded Universe dead now while the Star Trek Prime Universe is still alive? I'd say they're in the same position: still open to new fanwork but no longer active in official productions.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on May 26, 2014, 06:11:38 pm
Depends on how one interprets the effects of time travel. Usually, when one alters a timeline like that, the previous timeline ceases to exist though. At least, that's the interpretation most commonly used in Star Trek.

Since when? There are many episodes dealing with a "mirror universe" where things are different because people are different, and one TNG episode had Worf jumping from timeline to timeline.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on May 26, 2014, 11:00:30 pm
Depends on how one interprets the effects of time travel. Usually, when one alters a timeline like that, the previous timeline ceases to exist though. At least, that's the interpretation most commonly used in Star Trek.
Star trek has had timetravel and alternate realities before. One of my friends who is more of a Trekkie said that at least in the previous versions the old timeline remains and a new one is created in situation like the Star Trek Reboot movie.

It was a perfect way for them to do a reboot without making the old series and movies non-canon.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Witchyjoshy on May 27, 2014, 06:55:41 pm
Random question:

If you were going to buy a Lightsaber toy, which do you think is more important?

That it glows (and/or makes noise) or that it extends and retracts?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on May 27, 2014, 08:05:55 pm
Random question:

If you were going to buy a Lightsaber toy, which do you think is more important?

That it glows (and/or makes noise) or that it extends and retracts?

The glowing and sounds will always be more important, since we don't yet have strong enough materials to create a retractable blade sturdy enough to stand up to any but the lightest strikes.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on May 28, 2014, 04:52:23 am
We have several, and they all . . . um . . . extend and retract. 
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on May 28, 2014, 02:02:42 pm
I haven't seen any, at least not available as lightsaber toys. The only extendable lightsaber toys I've seen are the crappy nesting plastic ones (no idea what the technical term for it would be) that break on the first good hit.

So yeah, I'll stick with glowing and sounds being more important.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: m52nickerson on June 01, 2014, 09:51:24 pm
The glowing and sounds will always be more important, since we don't yet have strong enough materials to create a retractable blade sturdy enough to stand up to any but the lightest strikes.

I disagree, I have a retractable one that my kids play with and beat the ever living hell out of.  So I say retractable, they can look cool attached to a belt.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on June 02, 2014, 05:15:44 am
My wife and I broke two of ours the first day when we got into a lightsaber fight in the yard beside our apartment.  Luckily, we brought about 4 or 5 each.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on June 04, 2014, 07:01:42 pm
(http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/ay5KeVp_700b_v1.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Second Coming of Madman on June 07, 2014, 12:18:05 am
(click to show/hide)

I always wanted to see these stormtroopers.

Large image, therefore spoilered.

(click to show/hide)

Look at that! They look like some form of riot police with those shields and they have lightsabers hung on their belts. Can you imagine how the movies would have if Lucas went with this?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on June 07, 2014, 03:29:47 pm
I'm pretty sure the main reason he didn't is because of expense. In interviews he's said that what ends up in the movie tends to be only 30-40% of what he actually wanted to show.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on July 22, 2014, 06:25:28 pm
An album of clever lightsaber techniques:

http://imgur.com/gallery/rXss2 (http://imgur.com/gallery/rXss2)

I always wondered why there weren't more "turn off your lightsaber" moves.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Cloud3514 on July 22, 2014, 07:01:14 pm
I love that all the Dark Side ones end with "torture at will."
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on July 27, 2014, 09:06:02 am
Apparently some in universe material mentions that the Jedi teach to have some sort of force shield to protect against the "push/pull" powers. Otherwise there would be no reason not to spam them (other than if those are against the dueling rules.)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on August 05, 2014, 09:59:45 am
(http://d3dsacqprgcsqh.cloudfront.net/photo/a3dv6AQ_460sa_v1.gif)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on December 06, 2015, 06:57:04 pm
Wise fwom you gwave, thwead!

So, what do you guys think of the "Darth Jar Jar" theory?

https://www.reddit.com/comments/3qvj6w (https://www.reddit.com/comments/3qvj6w)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on December 06, 2015, 07:42:28 pm
That I'm honestly tired of seeing it everywhere.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on December 07, 2015, 12:36:47 am
My girlfriend and I are going to see the new movie as soon as we can after it comes out; we were hoping for the 18th but I suspect that everything is booked with preorders by now.

Anyway, predictions:

Luke Skywalker is going to die, probably via Kylo Ren's lightsaber. Luke is the Old Master now, just like Obi-Wan Kenobi and Qui-Gon Jinn, and both of them were dispatched by their trilogy's badass-looking Sith Lord in the first episode. Also, Finn, Rey, or whoever else is Luke's apprentice will scream "NOOO!" upon seeing this.

Alternately, Han Solo could die. Harrison Ford has been wanting to kill him off since Episode V. Either way, I fully expect at least one member of the original cast won't make it out alive.

Somebody's hand/arm will get chopped off by a lightsaber. I don't even think I need to justify this one.

Since it's been confirmed that Admiral Ackbar is going to be in the movie and JJ Abrams loves callbacks, the line "IT'S A TRAP!" will be uttered at some point.

Kylo Ren and Rey are part of the Skywalker family. The former has some strong ties to Darth Vader, and the latter is a Force user with some kind of family she's been waiting for. If Abrams does want to use some Expanded Universe elements (which I think he was open to), I wouldn't be surprised if they turn out to be Jacen and Jaina Solo. Alternately, Ren being Luke's son could make sense too.

The mask Kylo Ren wears is hiding something important. The only time we see him without it is in the duel against Finn, and that's only from behind. So the question is: Horrible scars of some kind? Family resemblance to a trusted mentor (ties in with the above)?

Kylo Ren may not be as loyal a member of the First Order as assumed. First, there's the usual caveat of the Rule of Two and he's almost certainly looking for ways to kill of Supreme Leader Snoke. Second, his statement "I will finish what you (Darth Vader) started" was suggested once to be incomplete, with the complete version being "I will finish what you started when you killed the Emperor." It was always Vader's plan to unseat the Emperor and take the Empire for himself; Ren is most likely trying to do the same.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on December 07, 2015, 04:55:29 am
Kylo without his mask:

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150612041219/villains/images/8/87/Kylo_Ren_Without_Mask.jpg (http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150612041219/villains/images/8/87/Kylo_Ren_Without_Mask.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Dakota Bob on December 07, 2015, 01:37:26 pm
You know what I think Harrison Ford likes more than killing off Solo? getting paid, son. I'll be pleasantly surprised if the new films have the balls to off any of the old guard.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: TheL on December 08, 2015, 02:05:41 pm
I've wanted to read a couple EU books to get me psyched up.  The Manbeast has dozens of them.  I ask for a recommendation.  He says, "Why read them?  They don't matter anymore."
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on December 08, 2015, 04:47:14 pm
Read the X-Wing series and fall in love with my bae.

Ironbite-Wedge Antillies.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: lord gibbon on December 08, 2015, 04:59:48 pm
Also, basically anything written by Timothy Zahn. Thrawn is the greatest Star Wars villain ever.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Art Vandelay on December 08, 2015, 06:49:36 pm
You know what I think Harrison Ford likes more than killing off Solo? getting paid, son. I'll be pleasantly surprised if the new films have the balls to off any of the old guard.
The guy's old and already loaded. I wouldn't be surprised if he wants his character killed off as quickly as possible so he has less work to do.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on December 09, 2015, 06:15:43 am
Also, basically anything written by Timothy Zahn. Thrawn is the greatest Star Wars villain ever.

The book, Aftermath, mentions a Fleet Admiral who is reassembling Imperial forces just outside the galaxy in the time following the Battle of Endor.  They don't go into detail with him, but his demeanor seems awfully familiar.   I wonder if this character will show up in Ep 8, and if so, will he be a very-familiar character.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Katsuro on December 13, 2015, 05:29:33 pm
You know what I think Harrison Ford likes more than killing off Solo? getting paid, son. I'll be pleasantly surprised if the new films have the balls to off any of the old guard.
The guy's old and already loaded. I wouldn't be surprised if he wants his character killed off as quickly as possible so he has less work to do.

I dunno, there's that interview were he was asked if he got nostalgic when he put the costume on and he replied, "No, I got paid." and it came across as only slightly tongue in cheek.  I think no matter how much money people have they never stop liking having even more.  I'd be surprised if you could find many millionaires who if asked, "Would you like to be a billionaire?" would say, "Nah, I'm good thanks.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on December 14, 2015, 07:45:54 pm
And now for something completely different: news anchor claims Star Wars is racist:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDFnrNtqAjo

What makes this really dumb is that there is legitimate grounds to claim racial insensitivity.  Jar-Jar might as well have stepped out of a minstrel show, it's not hard to see anti-Semitism when it comes to Watto, and the Neimoidians come off as being an extraterrestrial version of the Yellow Peril.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: TheContrarian on December 17, 2015, 07:46:56 am
Oh it's the "hard work is racist" lady.

Leftists ^_^
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: mellenORL on December 17, 2015, 09:13:25 am
I like the way she seems to get all teary-eyed when leading into her outrage over James Earl Jones not also being cast as Darth Vader when he was finally unmasked. That kind of intensity puts her in the emotionally edgy commentator column with Nancy Grace and Glenn Beck.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: IanC on December 17, 2015, 12:25:20 pm
I have seen The Force Awakens. Its great.

Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on December 17, 2015, 12:46:54 pm
I have seen The Force Awakens. Its great.

spoil it, and we will hunt you down, remove an organ of our choice, and force-feed it to you while you apologize. clear?

(seriously, though, awesome for you. i'm just waiting for the cinemas to clear out a bit before going, myself)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: IanC on December 17, 2015, 01:20:38 pm
I won't. Don't worry.

Theres plenty i want to scream about though :P So many moments!

Oh yeah the 3D version is alright, if you like that sort of thing. Its a conversion, but not a crappy thrown out at the last thing one.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on December 18, 2015, 01:02:00 am
I'm going  tomorrow at 1:50pm. I SOOOOOOOOO CAN'T WAIT!!
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on December 18, 2015, 04:56:05 am
I'm off Sunday and my wife ordered our tickets.  Counting down . . .
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Dakota Bob on December 18, 2015, 06:45:42 pm
Goddamnit, what the fuck is happening. I'm excited..to see a Star Wars movie? arrgh b0ss plz gibe me da tickets already.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on December 19, 2015, 01:53:58 pm
OK, my girlfriend and I are going to see it tomorrow evening. I seriously can't wait either.

Also, I'm tired of having to dodge spoilers, and I've already heard too much.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: TheL on December 19, 2015, 06:52:55 pm
Saw it yesterday morning.  OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG SO AWESOME!!!!  It felt just like the original trilogy. :)

Some of the theaters offer collectible SW-themed 3D glasses.  Hubby went to a showing on Thursday that offered them, and they're pretty neat.  (The showing we went to together yesterday was 3D, but didn't offer the collectible glasses.)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: lord gibbon on December 19, 2015, 08:26:48 pm
Going tomorrow with my roommates. Quite excited.

EDIT: Aaaaannndd Holy Mother of the Force! That was absolutely amazing!
Now I'm just wondering when spoilers are allowed so I can discuss the events.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Zygarde on December 21, 2015, 04:16:52 pm
So I just got back from watching it, holy crap that was fucking Awesome!!!!!
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on December 21, 2015, 04:53:10 pm
Awesome theater, awesome theater full of fans, who cheered and reacted to the scenes. 

One thing I noticed in the theater we were in:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: davedan on December 21, 2015, 05:37:48 pm
I loved it. I would also like to know when we can start talking about it sans spoilers.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on December 21, 2015, 05:47:20 pm
i'll try and see it in english tomorrow, if all goes well.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Art Vandelay on December 21, 2015, 06:27:31 pm
You guys realise that spoiler tags are a thing, right?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: davedan on December 21, 2015, 06:32:32 pm
Much like pants, spoiler tags can't contain my excitement.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on December 21, 2015, 11:23:41 pm
Saw it last night...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on December 22, 2015, 06:36:46 pm
Saw it last night...

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on December 23, 2015, 12:10:28 pm
ok, i'm biting the bullet and going to see it, in french and in 3d... oh well. hope it's worth it.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Svata on December 23, 2015, 12:17:48 pm
In the theater now for it.


Okay, out and sitting down again. Good movie, couldn't help but notice the distinct lack of severed limbs that would have been present is Lucas would have been involved.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on December 23, 2015, 04:12:23 pm
OH that hit all the right spots.

Ironbite-seriously all of them just....uh!
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on December 23, 2015, 05:14:52 pm
i think i'm... underwhelmed by the movie. the hype was so great, i was expecting something mind-blowing. too... badly-paced, i guess. the scenario holds up, mostly, the acting is good, the fanservice (not in a sexy sense) is immense, but i wouldn't call it better than a good movie.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: IanC on December 23, 2015, 05:28:04 pm
Awesome theater, awesome theater full of fans, who cheered and reacted to the scenes. 

One thing I noticed in the theater we were in:

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

Did anyone spot Daniel Craig?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Svata on December 23, 2015, 05:28:22 pm
i think i'm... underwhelmed by the movie. the hype was so great, i was expecting something mind-blowing. too... badly-paced, i guess. the scenario holds up, mostly, the acting is good, the fanservice (not in a sexy sense) is immense, but i wouldn't call it better than a good movie.


Pretty much. Hype was just too strong, and IMO, it left us with far too little knowledge of any of thenew characters other than Finn.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on December 23, 2015, 06:57:59 pm
In the theater now for it.


Okay, out and sitting down again. Good movie, couldn't help but notice the distinct lack of severed limbs that would have been present is Lucas would have been involved.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Zygarde on December 23, 2015, 09:02:44 pm
Clearly they are saving the limb severing for Episode Eight.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: TheL on December 25, 2015, 08:36:12 pm
Also, giggling at the fact that BB-8 was basically R2-D2 redux.

Seriously, think about it.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Svata on December 25, 2015, 10:26:52 pm
Seriously. Thought I was the only one to realize that.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Dakota Bob on December 26, 2015, 07:31:34 am
Got muh tickets to see it tommorow, in 2D. Ain't nobody got time for that 3D shit.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Svata on December 26, 2015, 09:40:27 am
Funnily enough, a 3D showing was the only one I could make it to with my schedule.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on December 26, 2015, 04:44:01 pm
The important question is who's the bigger emo kid/human fuck up in the GFFA, Anakin Skywalker or Ben Solo(Kylo Ren)??
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on December 26, 2015, 05:15:58 pm
Poe Dameron.

Ironbite-.....I have issues.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on December 26, 2015, 08:42:58 pm
Your hatred of Poe will lead to the dark side, do you want to end up a fuck up like Anakin and Kylo??
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on December 26, 2015, 08:45:44 pm
Nah.  I'll just be a bastard like Tarkin.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Dakota Bob on December 27, 2015, 03:23:57 pm
Yoo, just got back from the cinema!

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Cloud3514 on December 30, 2015, 06:48:37 pm
So Return of Kings is bragging about how their reporting on The Force Awakens as "SJW propaganda" somehow lost Disney $4.2 million. Even if that were somehow true, I'm sure Disney is furious that they missed out on not even a tenth of a percent of the money they HAVE made. Truly the movie is a failure because it's only made half of a billion dollars so far and that $4.2 million would have pushed it into success range.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on December 30, 2015, 06:56:21 pm
So Return of Kings is bragging about how their reporting on The Force Awakens as "SJW propaganda" somehow lost Disney $4.2 million. Even if that were somehow true, I'm sure Disney is furious that they missed out on not even a tenth of a percent of the money they HAVE made. Truly the movie is a failure because it's only made three quarters of a billion dollars so far and that $4.2 million would have pushed it into success range.

They legitimately think they have that kind of influence?  That's adorable.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on December 31, 2015, 12:05:27 am
So Return of Kings is bragging about how their reporting on The Force Awakens as "SJW propaganda" somehow lost Disney $4.2 million. Even if that were somehow true, I'm sure Disney is furious that they missed out on not even a tenth of a percent of the money they HAVE made. Truly the movie is a failure because it's only made half of a billion dollars so far and that $4.2 million would have pushed it into success range.

That's kind of cute really.  What did the idiots think Disney wouldn't sell this thing to every chain in existence?

Ironbite-you have no power here Return of Kings.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on December 31, 2015, 01:22:43 am
i have no idea what return of kings is, but they must be wrong on orders of magnitude for ironbite and ultie to agree.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Skybison on December 31, 2015, 02:23:01 am
Return of Kings is a garbage site that's a combination of date advice website for sociopaths and white supremecy/christian taliban neo-reactionary politics. 

I liked the new Star Wars movie, didn't love it but I enjoyed it.  It just felt too much like it was just a remake of A New Hope.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on December 31, 2015, 04:22:55 am
Return of Kings is a garbage site that's a combination of date advice website for sociopaths and white supremecy/christian taliban neo-reactionary politics. 

I liked the new Star Wars movie, didn't love it but I enjoyed it.  It just felt too much like it was just a remake of A New Hope.

that's pretty much exactly what ghoti and a fanboy friend of mine said. can we at least agree that it's a good adaptation? you know, erring on the side of caution but doing it well?

re: return of kings. that's... lovely. tell me again why anyone would look at that site first degree?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on December 31, 2015, 05:02:33 am
Yesterday we watched it in 3D.  Still enjoyed it, but I felt the 3D made no difference at all.  If you plan to see it (again), stick with the regular version, it's probably cheaper.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on January 02, 2016, 10:58:58 pm
I've heard some people claiming Rey is a Mary Sue.  Personally, I don't think so.  But I'd like to hear your opinions.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on January 03, 2016, 04:51:54 am
I've heard some people claiming Rey is a Mary Sue.  Personally, I don't think so.  But I'd like to hear your opinions.

In his first movie, Anakin blew up a giant spaceship.
In his first movie, Luke blew up a giant space station.
In her first movie, Rey beat the **** out of an already-injured darksider, while possibly tapping into the dark side herself.

Not the exact same pattern, but close enough.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 03, 2016, 04:55:48 am
I've seen it and it was pretty good.

Longer review will come later.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Canadian Mojo on January 03, 2016, 10:20:08 am
Not bad for a remake.  ;)

Too many plot holes and coincidences for my tastes, but this is ultimately a kids flick just like the rest of them are, and I think it worked very well on that level.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 03, 2016, 10:24:46 am
...It's not a remake when they continue the story.

I suppose you could make the argument that since Disney decided to cut off all of the EU from canon they are doing a remake of the stuff that happened after the films but in my mind a remake happens when you start the same story from scratch. ...Like all those Batman and Spiderman remakes.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Canadian Mojo on January 03, 2016, 02:48:31 pm
You're right, as a continuation it really can't be a 'remake,' but the parallels between it and episode IV are pretty darn striking. I'm curious to see what happens in the next two installments. If the grand finale is another death star and teddy bears saving the day I'll be very disappointed because there is a lot of potential here for some epic storytelling.

In the mean time it does give me an excuse to put this up ;D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m2FhRv8xF0
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on January 03, 2016, 02:49:07 pm
...It's not a remake when they continue the story.

I suppose you could make the argument that since Disney decided to cut off all of the EU from canon they are doing a remake of the stuff that happened after the films but in my mind a remake happens when you start the same story from scratch. ...Like all those Batman and Spiderman remakes.

It's not a literal remake, but it's certainly one in spirit.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 04, 2016, 05:08:55 am
For the record: I don't mind the "emo Vader wannabe" look Kylo has.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on January 04, 2016, 07:02:35 am
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on January 04, 2016, 11:37:13 am
(click to show/hide)

Not sure how canon but sources say around thirty.

Yes, I know.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on January 04, 2016, 05:40:27 pm
[spoilers]To me, Kylo is a wannabe villain.  He wants so hard to be bad and will do anything to be bad but he just...sucks at it.  And I love it.  For the past 30 years we've had Star Wars bad guys who are stopped just short of twirling a mustache and to see this guy fail so badly at it and act like an emo spoiled brat who isn't able to go to Hot Topic because his mom isn't home to drive him just makes me posititivly giddy!  As much as this was a retread of A New Hope, it had it's own story there.  And I'm so glad the story of this new trilogy isn't just gonna be for the good guys to win.  This is gonna be about redeeming someone who thinks he's an absolute monster but isn't and can never be.[/spoiler]

Ironbite-and anyone who wants to fight me on this can meet me on Alderaan.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on January 04, 2016, 08:19:33 pm
I've gotten into a few fights already with Kylo Ren fanboys who insist he's really badass and are upset at the emo jokes. Admit to it, he's carrying on the Skywalker family tradition of being a drama queen. I think having an unstable manchild as a villain is entertaining. Plus the fact that both him and Hux are on the verge of beating the crap out of each is too funny, willing to bet Supreme Leader Snoke has taken up the bottle due to listening to those two on a daily basis.

That being said it was fucking genius casting Adam Driver as Ben"Kylo Ren" Solo, given that both him and Harrison Ford have the same fucking crooked nose.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 05, 2016, 05:01:28 am
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Cloud3514 on January 05, 2016, 05:11:55 am
I don't see why Ren can't be both extremely unstable and a badass at the same time. You might argue that the whinyness undermines the badass part, but remember that the Dark Side of The Force is supposed to be fueled by passion and rage.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on January 05, 2016, 08:51:35 am
Also Kylo has been described by JJ as a villain in progress.  He hasn't reached the final stage yet, though I believe he took a huge step forward (at least in the eyes of the audience)
(click to show/hide)
.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on January 05, 2016, 09:57:51 am
I've gotten into a few fights already with Kylo Ren fanboys who insist he's really badass and are upset at the emo jokes. Admit to it, he's carrying on the Skywalker family tradition of being a drama queen. I think having an unstable manchild as a villain is entertaining. Plus the fact that both him and Hux are on the verge of beating the crap out of each is too funny, willing to bet Supreme Leader Snoke has taken up the bottle due to listening to those two on a daily basis.

That being said it was fucking genius casting Adam Driver as Ben"Kylo Ren" Solo, given that both him and Harrison Ford have the same fucking crooked nose.


I'm not sure how anyone can watch that movie and not come out thinking Ren is a whiny emo prettyboy.

He can also be a badass! But still a fucking whiny emo prettyboy.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on January 05, 2016, 12:14:57 pm
Well the people I've gotten into fights with don't want to acknowledge that he's still a whiny emo brat.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Canadian Mojo on January 05, 2016, 01:00:12 pm
Well the people I've gotten into fights with don't want to acknowledge that he's still a whiny emo brat.
(click to show/hide)

Is it wrong of me to hope
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on January 05, 2016, 06:35:00 pm
Well the people I've gotten into fights with don't want to acknowledge that he's still a whiny emo brat.
(click to show/hide)

Is it wrong of me to hope
(click to show/hide)

I mean, you can hope, but it seems extremely unlikely.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Canadian Mojo on January 05, 2016, 07:31:36 pm
Well the people I've gotten into fights with don't want to acknowledge that he's still a whiny emo brat.
(click to show/hide)

Is it wrong of me to hope
(click to show/hide)

I mean, you can hope, but it seems extremely unlikely.
(click to show/hide)

I know -- it's Disney.

The truth of it is, that's an ending that would appeal to me, someone who has watched the originals as a child and grown up since then. A non-cliche ending would make for a fantastic critically acclaimable ending but the kids that this series is intended for don't need or want one and it would actually be to their determent of their enjoyment to include one.



Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: The_Queen on January 05, 2016, 10:29:49 pm
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on January 07, 2016, 09:37:01 pm
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on January 08, 2016, 09:06:44 pm
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on January 08, 2016, 10:09:14 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Eiki-mun on January 09, 2016, 01:06:50 am
I finally saw the movie. Nothing I can say that wasn't already said, but I'm just glad that I don't have to worry about being spoiled anymore.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 09, 2016, 06:24:12 am
I finally saw the movie. Nothing I can say that wasn't already said, but I'm just glad that I don't have to worry about being spoiled anymore.

...I know how you feel. Although I have to admit that people were pretty good at keeping Star wars spoilers behind spoiler tags or otherwise issuing warnings when they were about to discuss the film. And it was pretty much the same all over the net.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: R. U. Sirius on January 09, 2016, 01:42:40 pm
I finally saw the movie. Nothing I can say that wasn't already said, but I'm just glad that I don't have to worry about being spoiled anymore.

...I know how you feel. Although I have to admit that people were pretty good at keeping Star wars spoilers behind spoiler tags or otherwise issuing warnings when they were about to discuss the film. And it was pretty much the same all over the net.

You obviously don't frequent Imgur. Some assholes there got their jollies by posting unmarked spoilers, or even posting gifs that started with one picture and then switched to a spoiler.

People. What a bunch of bastards.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Dr. Weird on January 09, 2016, 03:57:20 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on January 09, 2016, 10:08:01 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0315DUM6Cg

really interesting, also, he separates the spoiler free from the spoiler intensive. i stand behind most of what he says. the general ideas, at least, not some forgettable details.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 10, 2016, 05:39:49 am
I'm putting this here because it contains spoilers. Also contains awesome.

http://epicstream.com/features/This-Twitter-Spat-Between-Emo-Kylo-Ren-and-Very-Lonely-Luke-is-Awesome
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on January 12, 2016, 04:23:15 pm
I just to come here to admit to two things, Kylo is my emo, trash child, while I've fallen hard for Ginger Space Nazi trash(General Hux).
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 12, 2016, 04:58:11 pm
I just to come here to admit to two things, Kylo is my emo, trash child, while I've fallen hard for Ginger Space Nazi trash(General Hux).

Ahem. BRITISH Ginger Space Nazi trash General.

Because Hollywood still feels that only a British accent can be used to portray true evil.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on January 12, 2016, 05:57:38 pm
Tell me they're wrong then.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on January 12, 2016, 06:13:37 pm
That's one of my favorite things I love about the Star Wars movies, their love of the Evil Brit Trope, bonus points if they happen to have high cheekbones(and in case any one is wondering, HUGE Tarkin fangirl here).
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: guizonde on January 12, 2016, 06:15:38 pm
you guys are gonna wake up conty's persecution complex...
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 12, 2016, 06:20:47 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gX2JJ4MKAo
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: nickiknack on January 12, 2016, 07:06:16 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gX2JJ4MKAo

I REMEMBER THIS
mmmmm Hiddles*drools*
I would LOVE to see that man in an Imperial Uniform, and I (along with many others) kinda like to fan cast him as a Younger Tarkin.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 13, 2016, 02:31:34 pm
...And here is the best review of the film I've seen yet. It is also a great example of how clickbait journalism has ruined many things, including film reviews.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/matty-granger/at-long-lastmy-star-wars-episode-vii-review-the-force-awakens-the-rise-of-idiot-/10153163095086277

It's too long to paste here so I hope you guys can read it at the source.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on January 20, 2016, 03:32:35 am
Has anyone else noticed that every Star Wars trilogy has exactly one black guy in it?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on January 20, 2016, 04:56:19 am
No. The prequel films gad more than one. Mace Windu and the guard captain at least.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on January 20, 2016, 02:06:54 pm
No. The prequel films gad more than one. Mace Windu and the guard captain at least.

Right, I forgot about that guard captain on Naboo.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Dr. Weird on January 20, 2016, 06:32:37 pm
No. The prequel films gad more than one. Mace Windu and the guard captain at least.

Right, I forgot about that guard captain on Naboo.

And the Naboo Guard Captain in Episode 1 (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Panaka) and the Naboo Guard Captain in Episode 2 and 3 (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gregar_Typho) were two seperate people, though they were related.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: TheL on January 22, 2016, 03:52:33 pm
Whatever.  As long as I can imagine Finn, Poe, and Rey in a delightful triad of diversity, I'm happy.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on February 27, 2016, 11:38:45 am
J. J. Abrams says the next movie will have at least one openly gay character:

http://comicbook.com/2016/02/27/j-j-abrams-says-star-wars-universe-will-include-gay-characters/ (http://comicbook.com/2016/02/27/j-j-abrams-says-star-wars-universe-will-include-gay-characters/)

I'm fine with it, as long as he/she is a gay character, rather than a gay character, if you catch my drift.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Random Gal on February 27, 2016, 01:14:44 pm
J. J. Abrams says the next movie will have at least one openly gay character:

http://comicbook.com/2016/02/27/j-j-abrams-says-star-wars-universe-will-include-gay-characters/ (http://comicbook.com/2016/02/27/j-j-abrams-says-star-wars-universe-will-include-gay-characters/)

I'm fine with it, as long as he/she is a gay character, rather than a gay character, if you catch my drift.

Still hoping we get Finn/Poe.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Zygarde on February 27, 2016, 02:40:51 pm
You know this is going to piss off moral guardians, which is good in my book.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: The_Queen on February 27, 2016, 04:32:16 pm
I still have my fingers crossed that they put Laura Jane Grace in the next movie as a trans character. There was some talk a few months ago that it could happen.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on February 27, 2016, 05:03:13 pm
Quote
“I think it’s very subtle romance that’s happening,” Isaac teased.

Sure. "Subtle".
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: ironbite on February 27, 2016, 05:39:00 pm
So I wasn't the only one to scream "OH JUST KISS ALREADY!" in the theater when Poe/Finn met back at the Resistance base eh?
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Vypernight on February 28, 2016, 05:22:43 am
It could always be Rey.  People online keep trying to pair her up with Poe, Finn, or Kylo.  What if she ends up with Phasma, or a minor character who's a woman?  And then there's Hux . . .

In the book, Aftermath, there is a gay person and a lesbian couple, and no one even bats an eye.  I think they'll go the same way in the movie, with a minor character or couple but treating it as completely ordinary.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on February 28, 2016, 10:10:54 am
So I wasn't the only one to scream "OH JUST KISS ALREADY!" in the theater when Poe/Finn met back at the Resistance base eh?

You, me and apparently everyone else with a tumblr account.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on February 28, 2016, 10:30:51 am
I was just surprised that Poe was still alive. I didn't recognize him when he was flying and assumed that this was Poe's brother or something and Fin would have to be the one to tell him the bad news.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Eiki-mun on February 28, 2016, 01:44:18 pm
Hux x Finn OTP
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: lord gibbon on February 28, 2016, 05:37:11 pm
I was just surprised that Poe was still alive. I didn't recognize him when he was flying and assumed that this was Poe's brother or something and Fin would have to be the one to tell him the bad news.
Same here. It wasn't until Finn started shouting his name that I realized "oh hey, Poe didn't die."
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Svata on February 28, 2016, 06:15:37 pm
I was just surprised that Poe was still alive. I didn't recognize him when he was flying and assumed that this was Poe's brother or something and Fin would have to be the one to tell him the bad news.
Same here. It wasn't until Finn started shouting his name that I realized "oh hey, Poe didn't die."

 Oh, good, it wasn't just me.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on March 08, 2016, 12:56:49 am
Mark Hamill came out and said Luke's sexuality is open to interpretation:

http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/05/star-wars-mark-hamill-luke-skywalkers-sexuality-open-to-interpretation (http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/05/star-wars-mark-hamill-luke-skywalkers-sexuality-open-to-interpretation)

Personally, I could maybe see him as bi, but considering some of his interactions with Leia, I don't think it makes sense for him to be gay.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Sigmaleph on March 08, 2016, 01:23:41 am
~anyone can be gay if you try hard and believe in yourself~

Sorry, I had a little tumblr stuck there. Anyway, you can totally fit a narrative of Luke being closeted or straight-curious or whatever with his interactions with Leia, if you want to interpret him as gay.
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Askold on March 08, 2016, 02:37:01 am
Luke was still a young man in the original films so it is possible that he might have not realized that he is homosexual or bisexual. (Besides, he was never the one to initiate any sexual contact or intimacy and always seemed surprised when his sister kissed him suddenly.)
Title: Re: Star Wars thread
Post by: Ultimate Paragon on March 08, 2016, 11:30:28 am
Or maybe the fact that he nearly got together with his sister turned him off women altogether.