0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No matter what happens, no matter what my last words may end up being, I want everyone to claim that they were: "If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."
Aww, you guys rock. I feel the love... and the pitchforks and torches. Tingly!
Quote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.
Quote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.
Quote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.
Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.
Quote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?
Does anyone take Donald Trump seriously, anymore?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?
Quote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?
Quote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?
Quote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?
It doesn't concern you, Sister, that kind of absolutist view of the universe? Right and wrong determined solely by a single all-knowing, all powerful being whose judgment cannot be questioned and in whose name the most horrendous acts can be sanctioned without appeal?
Being required by someone else’s religious beliefs to behave contrary to one’s sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.