Oh please. My last name is in German. I get underlined, too.
Another transethnicity person. And, fuck you, Google. That is not a word.
The three rules of BDSM are "Safe, sane and consensual". You violated two of them right there.
Yes, that'll get you accepted.
Ew.
Please be a troll.
i’ve completely stopped using “lgbtq”. for one thing, i am rarely talking about gay and lesbians (monosexuals) in the same context as bisexuals, and less am i talking about trans people within that context. furthermore, i don’t recognize lesbian, gay, bisexual OR trans people to be necessarily “queer” in the way i understand queer; some of them are trying to be “normal”- so queer is it’s own separate thing. lastly, where are pansexuals, polysexuals, asexuals, and intersex people? or radical heterosexuals? for this reason, generally i just speak of whatever people i am referring to. sometimes, however, i notice that i just use “queer” (as in “other queer people”). but this is problematic because i don’t necessarily see “queer people” the way i see myself as a queer person; in fact, i don’t identify people as queer unless they are intentionally trying to subvert a norm or disrupt something. so i was thinking of maybe using queer+ or queer* to denote radical and/or self-identified queers from those that society deems as queer for simply existing (all people in the alphabet soup)…. does anyone think that could catch on the way trans* has?