I suppose someone decided the swastika is the religious symbol of Nazi Mysticism? :S
But oh my gosh those cartoons are a hoot and a half.
Edited to add- Oh goodness, it's hosted on Aryan-Nation.org? I haven't seen those chaps in a while when it comes to this sort of thing.
I suppose someone decided the swastika is the religious symbol of Nazi Mysticism? :S
But oh my gosh those cartoons are a hoot and a half.
Edited to add- Oh goodness, it's hosted on Aryan-Nation.org? I haven't seen those chaps in a while when it comes to this sort of thing.
Isn't it illegal to show a swastika on German television?
....what the hell?
Ironbite-the hell is these comics?
Last time I checked, the US really didn't force you to get treated for health care...
This may have worked in Canada...or some pinko European country
To get things rolling, a comic by the guy who illustrated the first edition of The Turner Diaries...
WHITE POWER COMES TO MIDVALE!
(http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/6183/midale2.jpg)
....
....what the hell?
Ironbite-the hell is these comics?
CounterThink
By which I can only assume that it means "respond to rational thought with mindless unthought"
....what the hell?
Ironbite-the hell is these comics?
CounterThink
By which I can only assume that it means "respond to rational thought with mindless unthought"
I think Mike Adams uses them in his "Natural News" articles.
Why do they always make the swatiska the symbol for white people?
I suppose someone decided the swastika is the religious symbol of Nazi Mysticism? :S
But oh my gosh those cartoons are a hoot and a half.
Edited to add- Oh goodness, it's hosted on Aryan-Nation.org? I haven't seen those chaps in a while when it comes to this sort of thing.
Isn't it illegal to show a swastika on German television?
No. Not really. It is illegal to show it in a 'positive light' but if you show that it's educational than no. Many games and documentaries have gotten the educational exception for the swastika. Not to mention you can also have it plastered on a book cover if you like. However, I don't mean animated cartoons. Aryan-Nation.org likewise is not stationed in Germany.
Why do they always make the swatiska the symbol for white people?
Maybe white-pride racists are secretly Hindu. ???
I suppose someone decided the swastika is the religious symbol of Nazi Mysticism? :S
But oh my gosh those cartoons are a hoot and a half.
Edited to add- Oh goodness, it's hosted on Aryan-Nation.org? I haven't seen those chaps in a while when it comes to this sort of thing.
Isn't it illegal to show a swastika on German television?
No. Not really. It is illegal to show it in a 'positive light' but if you show that it's educational than no. Many games and documentaries have gotten the educational exception for the swastika. Not to mention you can also have it plastered on a book cover if you like. However, I don't mean animated cartoons. Aryan-Nation.org likewise is not stationed in Germany.
World War II games are only greenlit in Germany if they replace all swastikas with the Iron Cross, too. I know this because a German history buff and WWII game fan told me so directly.
(http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/15119631775/1/tumblr_lx41igvqIV1r7o318)
Not political, but:
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxchtfvqTq1qk1yjso1_500.jpg)
If both are hiding in my house, then obviously I fear the black man more than the spider. Not because he is black, but because he is a man - a human being, capable of using tools and intelligence to inflict far more pain than a spider could ever dream of.Speak for yourself. I once accidentally squished a black man... I'm still living down the accusations of racism.
Also, because I can't squish him underfoot.
You didn’t see him, huh? Well, then I guess you’re just one of those sneaky racists that just can’t be bothered to acknowledge your fellow man. Geez, you’re worse than the blatant bigots!
Not political, but:
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxchtfvqTq1qk1yjso1_500.jpg)
(http://prolifeunity.com/images/uploads/Plan_B_KIDS_HT.gif)
(http://prolifeunity.com/images/uploads/Plan_B_KIDS_HT.gif)
(http://prolifeunity.com/images/uploads/Plan_B_KIDS_HT.gif)
(http://prolifeunity.com/images/uploads/Plan_B_KIDS_HT.gif)
The fuck...
(http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/15119631775/1/tumblr_lx41igvqIV1r7o318)
Best typo ever.
I want to know why all those German pubic servants and prominent Nazis faked evidence to indict themselves of horrifying crimes. And where did all those Jews, gypsies, homosexuals and political opponents go?
(http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/15119631775/1/tumblr_lx41igvqIV1r7o318)
Because mass disease could never be a weapon used as part of a policy of genocide. Never.
I want to know why all those German pubic servants and prominent Nazis faked evidence to indict themselves of horrifying crimes. And where did all those Jews, gypsies, homosexuals and political opponents go?
Real historians, probably not. Plenty of people consider themselves experts because they read a Wikipedia article. I like to believe that's the type of person who buys into Holocaust-denial stuff.
Real historians, probably not. Plenty of people consider themselves experts because they read a Wikipedia article. I like to believe that's the type of person who buys into Holocaust-denial stuff.
Real historians, probably not. Plenty of people consider themselves experts because they read a Wikipedia article. I like to believe that's the type of person who buys into Holocaust-denial stuff.
I sincerely doubt they even read a wikipedia article.
Most likely, they find a holocaust denial site. Because the thing about conspiracy theories is that they SOUND good, but when one actually does research, it ends up bullshit. And most people don't do research.
What I don't understand is why so many skinheads are holocaust-deniers. Isn't this the closest thing they have to look at as a victory?
Please tell me no 20th century historian anywhere believes this.
In some European countries, Holocaust denial is against the law.
The Pledge of Allegiance
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxiarhXV271r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvo4e36pZ01qe8brmo1_500.jpg)
(http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/5024/ww2p12.gif)
Quote(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvo4e36pZ01qe8brmo1_500.jpg)
Oh, more of the “He fought for your rights so you would never use them†bullshit.
Try getting a skinhead to actually admit he's racist first. Or doesn't like Jewish people. Or black people. I've run into a few people who insist it's just a fashion genre.
Possibly the fight in Afghanistan. Assuming the enemy over there was in any sort of position to launch further strikes. But then again, then the actual threat to our rights, as opposed to our personal safety, actually came from Congress.
Quote(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvo4e36pZ01qe8brmo1_500.jpg)
Oh, more of the “He fought for your rights so you would never use them†bullshit.
And when was the last war that was fought to prevent an actual threat?
Having served in the US Military I can say the pledge definitely has it's place, and I encourage its use for military personnel and other government workers (such as politicians) as upholding it is a part of their specific duty. I do not, however, think it really belongs in our schools. Children are not able to really understand it when it's first done (I remember it being recited as early as Kindergarten, though I can't remember if it was in pre-school or not), and putting it in such a place makes them feel it's a necessity instead of a choice. Some people desire to move to another country when they grow up (for whatever reason), and there's also the issue of exchange students and students who are a citizen of multiple countries. I also do not appreciate it made into something that people will mindlessly recite, as that is one of the best ways to degrade it into complete meaninglessness.
I would actually prefer a pledge to the constitution than the flag, as I feel it makes far more sense. I would say pledging it to the country as a whole and its ideals would be better, but I think the constitution holds the ideals in as concrete a manner as possible.This I agree with. The Constitution actually has an explicit message, so you can actually have a sort of allegiance to that.
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvo4e36pZ01qe8brmo1_500.jpg)
Having served in the US Military I can say the pledge definitely has it's place, and I encourage its use for military personnel and other government workers (such as politicians) as upholding it is a part of their specific duty. I do not, however, think it really belongs in our schools. Children are not able to really understand it when it's first done (I remember it being recited as early as Kindergarten, though I can't remember if it was in pre-school or not), and putting it in such a place makes them feel it's a necessity instead of a choice. Some people desire to move to another country when they grow up (for whatever reason), and there's also the issue of exchange students and students who are a citizen of multiple countries. I also do not appreciate it made into something that people will mindlessly recite, as that is one of the best ways to degrade it into complete meaninglessness.[anecdote]When I was really young I didn't understand why the nation was invisible.[/anecdote]
Quote
In my almost 4 years in a U.S. public high school, I have never once seen any student stand at attention like that and actually recite the pledge. Sure, most of them will stand up, but that's about it. No hand-over-chest, no facing the flag, and definitely no verbal recitation.
Kids don't give as much of a shit about their loyalty pledge as these people seem to think.
In my almost 4 years in a U.S. public high school
I would actually prefer a pledge to the constitution than the flag, as I feel it makes far more sense. I would say pledging it to the country as a whole and its ideals would be better, but I think the constitution holds the ideals in as concrete a manner as possible.
[anecdote]When I was really young I didn't understand why the nation was invisible.[/anecdote]
I can imagine that boy intelligently saying...
"Thank you, sir. Thank you for fighting for my rights. Both the right to stand up to pledge allegiance and the right to not stand up. In many of the countries you fought, they would force such things on their children. Stand up and pledge allegiance, or die. You fought so that I have the choice to sit down. The right to disagree with my country. Thank you, sir."
And then the kid salutes him.
And the man salutes back, tears in his eyes. And the teacher just feels guilty for trying to guilt-trip her students into such a thing.
...Ah, but we know that last part would never happen.
Here’s a hint kid: That clay pony doesn’t see, hear, or think anything.
[anecdote]When I was really young I didn't understand why the nation was invisible.[/anecdote]
When I was a child, I misinterpreted the "Stand on guard for thee" lines in O Canada as "Stand on God for thee".
I can imagine that boy intelligently saying...
"Thank you, sir. Thank you for fighting for my rights. Both the right to stand up to pledge allegiance and the right to not stand up. In many of the countries you fought, they would force such things on their children. Stand up and pledge allegiance, or die. You fought so that I have the choice to sit down. The right to disagree with my country. Thank you, sir."
And then the kid salutes him.
And the man salutes back, tears in his eyes. And the teacher just feels guilty for trying to guilt-trip her students into such a thing.
...Ah, but we know that last part would never happen.
Depends which country. If he's a veteran of anything after 1945, he wasn't fighting for any American's freedom. In fact, in the vast majority of cases, American soldiers since '45 have been fighting against the advance of freedom.
I can imagine that boy intelligently saying...
"Thank you, sir. Thank you for fighting for my rights. Both the right to stand up to pledge allegiance and the right to not stand up. In many of the countries you fought, they would force such things on their children. Stand up and pledge allegiance, or die. You fought so that I have the choice to sit down. The right to disagree with my country. Thank you, sir."
And then the kid salutes him.
And the man salutes back, tears in his eyes. And the teacher just feels guilty for trying to guilt-trip her students into such a thing.
...Ah, but we know that last part would never happen.
Depends which country. If he's a veteran of anything after 1945, he wasn't fighting for any American's freedom. In fact, in the vast majority of cases, American soldiers since '45 have been fighting against the advance of freedom.
The Korean War?
I can imagine that boy intelligently saying...
"Thank you, sir. Thank you for fighting for my rights. Both the right to stand up to pledge allegiance and the right to not stand up. In many of the countries you fought, they would force such things on their children. Stand up and pledge allegiance, or die. You fought so that I have the choice to sit down. The right to disagree with my country. Thank you, sir."
And then the kid salutes him.
And the man salutes back, tears in his eyes. And the teacher just feels guilty for trying to guilt-trip her students into such a thing.
...Ah, but we know that last part would never happen.
Depends which country. If he's a veteran of anything after 1945, he wasn't fighting for any American's freedom. In fact, in the vast majority of cases, American soldiers since '45 have been fighting against the advance of freedom.
The Korean War?
Having served in the US Military I can say the pledge definitely has it's place, and I encourage its use for military personnel and other government workers (such as politicians) as upholding it is a part of their specific duty. I do not, however, think it really belongs in our schools. Children are not able to really understand it when it's first done (I remember it being recited as early as Kindergarten, though I can't remember if it was in pre-school or not), and putting it in such a place makes them feel it's a necessity instead of a choice. Some people desire to move to another country when they grow up (for whatever reason), and there's also the issue of exchange students and students who are a citizen of multiple countries. I also do not appreciate it made into something that people will mindlessly recite, as that is one of the best ways to degrade it into complete meaninglessness.[anecdote]When I was really young I didn't understand why the nation was invisible.[/anecdote]
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of naked women.
I thought "Under God" was added during the Cold War because America wanted to distance itself from those filthy godless commies as much as possible.
I thought "Under God" was added during the Cold War because America wanted to distance itself from those filthy godless commies as much as possible.
[anecdote]When I was really young I didn't understand why the nation was invisible.[/anecdote]
When I was a child, I misinterpreted the "Stand on guard for thee" lines in O Canada as "Stand on God for thee".
[anecdote]When I was really young I didn't understand why the nation was invisible.[/anecdote]
When I was a child, I misinterpreted the "Stand on guard for thee" lines in O Canada as "Stand on God for thee".
Probably with your boot on his neck, clothing torn in sexually suggestive but ultimately unrevealing fashion, blood dripping from various wounds as you howl your victorious rage at the sky.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxagzqNnwO1qdenbvo1_500.jpg)
Linked because huge. Erm... I don't really... huh? (http://manboobz.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/3b49127_thenewwomanandherbicycletherew-tif.jpg)
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvo4e36pZ01qe8brmo1_500.jpg)It was wrong when my friend posted this tripe on her Facebook page and it's wrong now.
Linked because huge. Erm... I don't really... huh? (http://manboobz.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/3b49127_thenewwomanandherbicycletherew-tif.jpg)
(http://www.marianland.com/marxism/True_Professionals.gif)Even if one made the argument that Lenin was evil, what the fuck did Karl Marx do that was so horrible? He had nothing to do with human rights abuses committed by the Soviet Union.
Ron Paul has an almost-perfect trollface in that picture.
I should point out I got it from an article about how just about everyone got mad at the women for the velocipedestriennes. It's subtle but it's there: a jab at feminism by making women more independent now that they could travel further than the corner drug store.
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
Because only one person can ever come up with a solution to a problem, and once that person dies, the solution is GONE FOREVER.
Remind me again why I used to believe this stuff?
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxt97bY7TP1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)Um...I'm pretty sure they were gonna be the next Hitler...
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
That's supposed to be Beyonce and Jay-Z. Still have no clue what the cartoon is trying to say, though. Are they attention-whoring their child? Black people like precious metals?I think it's referring to how they included cries of their newborn into their newest song.
That's supposed to be Beyonce and Jay-Z. Still have no clue what the cartoon is trying to say, though. Are they attention-whoring their child? Black people like precious metals?I think it's referring to how they included cries of their newborn into their newest song.
The price of being absurdly wealthy and having everyone know who you are is that everyone knows who you are and many people will act like total idiots over it. Want to keep your privacy? Don't become so famous that people want to know every facet of your life better than you yourself know.
I dunno but I do know there's a strain of pot named after their little bundle of joy.
I dunno but I do know there's a strain of pot named after their little bundle of joy.
...and now I'll remember there's a baby with a pot strain named after them, long after I've forgotten who the parents are.
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
Yours has slightly better artwork
If one wants to turn the argument around, one can also point out the young mothers who had to abandon their scientific or otherwise careers for the baby.It never occurs to them that the baby may also be potential mass murderer.(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)Yours has slightly better artwork
It never occurs to them that the baby may also be potential mass murderer.If one wants to turn the argument around, one can also point out the young mothers who had to abandon their scientific or otherwise careers for the baby.
If one wants to turn the argument around, one can also point out the young mothers who had to abandon their scientific or otherwise careers for the baby.As if the women could ever have a productive career in science or any non-nursing profession anyway. They'd be just taking the jobs from more qualified males. Good riddance to them!
Oh, don't worry, we can rig the game so women have to work twice as hard to get half as far.If one wants to turn the argument around, one can also point out the young mothers who had to abandon their scientific or otherwise careers for the baby.As if the women could ever have a productive career in science or any non-nursing profession anyway. They'd be just taking the jobs from more qualified males. Good riddance to them!
Edit: No, I'm not serious. Just in case somebody was wondering...
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8qRRG_WD2mk/Sbpr5kid48I/AAAAAAAABU0/093TVuFj4s0/s400/cartoon+gay+marriage+calif.jpg)
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8qRRG_WD2mk/Sbpr5kid48I/AAAAAAAABU0/093TVuFj4s0/s400/cartoon+gay+marriage+calif.jpg)All you need to do is replace the two male symbols with a black and white person holding hands and you get the 1960s version of this cartoon
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8qRRG_WD2mk/Sbpr5kid48I/AAAAAAAABU0/093TVuFj4s0/s400/cartoon+gay+marriage+calif.jpg)All you need to do is replace the two male symbols with a black and white person holding hands and you get the 1960s version of this cartoon
Unsurprisingly, this sort of thing is extremely easy to do with ANY anti-marriage-equality argument or cartoon. Are we doomed to have the same bullshit arguments trotted out every fifty years about something or other?
What a man and a woman and another woman want to do with a midget is their own business.
You gave them 50 years? How charming.
My money says we will see this same cartoon within 30 years. The judge will be talking to an interracial gay couple and their adopted children. He'll be being pulled away by multiple partners.
President Obama's turning his back on all the presidents who came before him who were always for the common man. Also he's standing on the Constitution.
Ironbite-so yeah...doubly insulting.
Remember the guy who painted this tripe?I love the look of James Madison. It's as if he's saying, "Dude, srsly wtf, you know how many drafts we went through?"
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8t59jorH2DM/TB9_j2ryAVI/AAAAAAAAFYY/beBUS68s6cM/s1600/McNaughton+-+One+Nation+Under+God.jpg)
Well he painted this tripe:
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)
(http://c.cslacker.com/9153l.jpg)
President Obama's turning his back on all the presidents who came before him who were always for the common man. Also he's standing on the Constitution.
Ironbite-so yeah...doubly insulting.
Except for Clinton and FDR who are apparently applauding.
::)
Oy Vay
JFK and Bush 2 look like they're giving each other the side-glance.
JFK and Bush 2 look like they're giving each other the side-glance.
I think their pointing at Madison and trying not to laugh at him.
President Obama's turning his back on all the presidents who came before him who were always for the common man. Also he's standing on the Constitution.
Ironbite-so yeah...doubly insulting.
Except for Clinton and FDR who are apparently applauding.
::)
Oy Vay
Of course, he is being supported by those dirty socialists while all true Americans are disgusted at him.
Also, anyone notice that FDR is standing? What the hell?
Regarding that one big pic (Not the one with Obama, the one with Jesus)
I was looking at it, and noticed at the very right edge, with the 'sinners' there's a faint image of a sinister man in a cloak. Scared the bejeesus out of me. Who the hell is that.
Regarding that one big pic (Not the one with Obama, the one with Jesus)
I was looking at it, and noticed at the very right edge, with the 'sinners' there's a faint image of a sinister man in a cloak. Scared the bejeesus out of me. Who the hell is that.
Remember the guy who painted this tripe?
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8t59jorH2DM/TB9_j2ryAVI/AAAAAAAAFYY/beBUS68s6cM/s1600/McNaughton+-+One+Nation+Under+God.jpg)
Regarding that one big pic (Not the one with Obama, the one with Jesus)
I was looking at it, and noticed at the very right edge, with the 'sinners' there's a faint image of a sinister man in a cloak. Scared the bejeesus out of me. Who the hell is that.
Apparently being pregnant, a news reporter & having a cell phone makes you EVILLL!
Is that Palpatine in the lower right group?I think the intention may have been for it to be “some lazy homeless bum,†but that is just a guess on my part.
Is that Palpatine in the lower right group?I think the intention may have been for it to be “some lazy homeless bum,†but that is just a guess on my part.
Otherwise, it has gotta be Palpatine.
Is that Palpatine in the lower right group?*looks at painting, notices "Palpatine" starts to laugh, chokes on her ice tea*
Is that Palpatine in the lower right group?*looks at painting, notices "Palpatine" starts to laugh, chokes on her ice tea*
I find it weird that a pregnant teen would on the same side as Palpatine, you would think Palpatine would have more in common with those phonies on the left?? ???
So... the Christian Right is actually run by Palpatine?
THIS ALL MAKES SENSE NOW
I actually like this version better
(http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/One_Nation_Under_Cthulhu_9704.jpg)
EDIT 2: So apparently standing beside Satan is the liberal "Professor" who carries a copy of The Origin of Species in his hand. Subtle, man. Real subtle.
(http://generalbrock.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/abortion-rights.jpg)
(http://generalbrock.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/abortion-rights.jpg)
They aren't totally illegal. It depends on the state, although it is illegal in most states. In those states where it is legal the reasons a woman can get one are very limited.
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/12/2012/02/07/105891_600.jpg)...there are no graves in there. That can't be right... ???
(ca-lip!)...there are no graves in there. That can't be right... ???
HAHAHAHA. Oh conservatives. You make me giggle like a crazy person. You're so cute, pretending to give a fuck about providing low- or no-cost medical services to women to prevent, detect, and treat breast cancer. Because goodness knows you're totally on board with this whole universal healthcare thing and would never DREAM of telling a poor or unemployed or underemployed woman who lacks health coverage (or isn't fortunate enough to have decent coverage) that if she wanted the privilege of seeing a doctor then she should have gotten a better job. And especially you love the notion of those underprivileged women you like so much having the guts to ask for assistance from any kind of charity at all. Because you're totes into using taxpayer money to provide services available to all taxpayers.
Cutie patooties, you lot are. This shit is better than cable.
(ca-lip!)...there are no graves in there. That can't be right... ???
It is. We've been eating them all...
SOYLENT GREEN IS BABIES! Mmm...babies.
And, before you ask what's done with the bones...ever think of what goes into those nice little calcium supplements? Oh, and Taco Bell's tortillas.
HAHAHAHA. Oh conservatives. You make me giggle like a crazy person. You're so cute, pretending to give a fuck about providing low- or no-cost medical services to women to prevent, detect, and treat breast cancer. Because goodness knows you're totally on board with this whole universal healthcare thing and would never DREAM of telling a poor or unemployed or underemployed woman who lacks health coverage (or isn't fortunate enough to have decent coverage) that if she wanted the privilege of seeing a doctor then she should have gotten a better job. And especially you love the notion of those underprivileged women you like so much having the guts to ask for assistance from any kind of charity at all. Because you're totes into using taxpayer money to provide services available to all taxpayers.
Cutie patooties, you lot are. This shit is better than cable.
Cait, if you ever decide to get sex reassignment surgery, please marry me.
Yeah, but I like cock, so...
Yeah, but I like cock, so...
Strap-ons might do the trick. I like boobs, too, so you don't have to bind your chest. Shane can provide the masculine psychology, and also wear a strap-on (or if he decides to transition, that's cool, too). We'll just have to all marry each other in different districts, because of the whole polygamy thing, and then we can have some kind of awesome three-way marriage that will make Ironbite's head explode.
Both of his heads.
Strap-ons might do the trick. I like boobs, too, so you don't have to bind your chest. Shane can provide the masculine psychology, and also wear a strap-on (or if he decides to transition, that's cool, too). We'll just have to all marry each other in different districts, because of the whole polygamy thing, and then we can have some kind of awesome three-way marriage that will make Ironbite's head explode.
Both of his heads.
Psssh. No you don't. If you loved me you'd totally come into my bedroom and watch me sleep and disable my car so I couldn't leave you, all the while sending mixed signals of the 'I-LOVE-YOU-BUT-I-AM-A-MONSTER-AND-I-WILL-HURT-YOU!!' variety. And be all moody and morose and shit. And sparkle in an appropriately Adonis-like fashion.
Cos that's what true love is. Totally not creepy stalker behaviour. It's ROMANCE, goddammit, Twilight tells me so!
Well if it comes with the added bonus of causing Ironbite to rupture something, then I'm completely sold**.
Where would you like to go on our honeymoon? I hear Planned Parenthood offers really nice package tours of abortion cemeteries by state--they even have a package that includes nightly 'baby-que' of spit-roasted fetus and a weekend at an Atheist Reeducation Centre where they burn a real live Christian at the stake. It just sounds so romantic...
I keed! I luff you, Ironbite!
Psssh. No you don't. If you loved me you'd totally come into my bedroom and watch me sleep and disable my car so I couldn't leave you, all the while sending mixed signals of the 'I-LOVE-YOU-BUT-I-AM-A-MONSTER-AND-I-WILL-HURT-YOU!!' variety. And be all moody and morose and shit. And sparkle in an appropriately Adonis-like fashion.
Cos that's what true love is. Totally not creepy stalker behaviour. It's ROMANCE, goddammit, Twilight tells me so!
We're no strangers to love
You know the rules and so do I
A full commitment's what I'm thinking of
You wouldn't get this from any other guy
I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling
Gotta make you understand
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
Remember the guy who painted this tripe?
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8t59jorH2DM/TB9_j2ryAVI/AAAAAAAAFYY/beBUS68s6cM/s1600/McNaughton+-+One+Nation+Under+God.jpg)
Shouldn't the guy counting his money be on the left side of the painting?
How is birth control a big problem?From what I hear, it somehow leads to abortion and lets them brown folks in other countries outpopulate us.
(http://patriotupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/contraception-cartoon.jpg)
I'm actually not convinced Mahmoud Ahmelongnameijad doesn't have cartoonishly evil desire for nuclear power... not sure that belongs in Worst. Especially next to all these other ones that make absolutely no sense.
I'm actually not convinced Mahmoud Ahmelongnameijad doesn't have cartoonishly evil desire for nuclear power... not sure that belongs in Worst. Especially next to all these other ones that make absolutely no sense.
It is supposed to justify US invasion of Iran, and to try and stop them from getting any sort of nuclear power. Also, there's no way Iran would drop the bomb if they get it. Plus from what I heard that quote it was based off of was taken out of context.
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3444/3267397710_c9a6c5e31a.jpg)
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3444/3267397710_c9a6c5e31a.jpg)
I...I really don't get this. The fuck is going on here?
Ironbite-what the hell is the artist trying to say here? I'm angry.
If we're having a fabulous queer polygamous marriage, may I join? Shane can marry Antéchrist and I will marry Cait, and then we can switch whenever we get bored.
*squees at the thought of Archduchess Cait wearing a strap-on!*
Umm, L....I think you'll have to get used to cold weather after all, my dear.
*takes L by the hand, and rushes off with her toward New York*
Uh, yeah, birth control is being depicted as the problem. Birth control which would solve overpopulation. Really seems to be an anti-contraceptive cartoon to me.
And what bothers me the most is that catholic hospitals don't give their non-catholic employees an choice in if they want Birth Control to be part of the health plan. It's an automatic NO Birth Control for YOU!!
Goddamn this is creepy
(http://www.faithmouse.com/cartoon15.jpg)
Goddamn this is creepy
(http://www.faithmouse.com/cartoon15.jpg)
Here's another cartoon.
http://www.faithmouse.com/faithmouse-komen-cartoon-large.gif (http://www.faithmouse.com/faithmouse-komen-cartoon-large.gif)
Linked for boobs.
http://faithmouse.blogspot.com/ (http://faithmouse.blogspot.com/)
And here's his blog. I find it amusing that he has a few comics that could be construed as anti-gay, yet a few posts below that he has male nude paintings...
Uh, yeah, birth control is being depicted as the problem. Birth control which would solve overpopulation. Really seems to be an anti-contraceptive cartoon to me.
This. There are still idiots who believe that widespread use of contraception would somehow be enough to cause a population collapse.
Uh, yeah, birth control is being depicted as the problem. Birth control which would solve overpopulation. Really seems to be an anti-contraceptive cartoon to me.
This. There are still idiots who believe that widespread use of contraception would somehow be enough to cause a population collapse.
I have actually seen documentaries about this. One of which relied mostly on the idea that showing videos where children are fading out makes people go 'Oh noes!'
'Demographic Winter', I think it was called.
Uh, yeah, birth control is being depicted as the problem. Birth control which would solve overpopulation. Really seems to be an anti-contraceptive cartoon to me.
This. There are still idiots who believe that widespread use of contraception would somehow be enough to cause a population collapse.
I have actually seen documentaries about this. One of which relied mostly on the idea that showing videos where children are fading out makes people go 'Oh noes!'
'Demographic Winter', I think it was called.
Today my dad was going on and on about how it's bad that there are fewer kids being born in the world today because he wants someone to pay for his social security.
Which is only funny because he's totally against government handouts.
Is it wrong that those made me laugh? :V
-pic snip-
Good job, but you forgot baby Moses!
How's THAT for an obscure reference that probably nobody will get?
Didn't the Angry Video Game Nerd review all the "Bible games" a while back? That and a cracked.com article I read a while back are how I know about these games.Good job, but you forgot baby Moses!
How's THAT for an obscure reference that probably nobody will get?
Bible Adventures or some other similarly named game. Baby blue cartridge. Wisdom Tree.
http://cache.blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbert.gif (http://cache.blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbert.gif)
-pic snip-
I thought I'd give that second one a little update, considering no abortion would be preformed on an infant.
So, here you go. My take on that little pro-life tripe (forgive the comic sans, please):
(http://i44.tinypic.com/27yao8z.jpg)
Good job, but you forgot baby Moses!
How's THAT for an obscure reference that probably nobody will get?
Bible Adventures or some other similarly named game. Baby blue cartridge. Wisdom Tree. NES.
(http://cache.blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbert.gif)
Didn't the Angry Video Game Nerd review all the "Bible games" a while back? That and a cracked.com article I read a while back are how I know about these games.Good job, but you forgot baby Moses!
How's THAT for an obscure reference that probably nobody will get?
Bible Adventures or some other similarly named game. Baby blue cartridge. Wisdom Tree.
http://cache.blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbert.gif (http://cache.blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbert.gif)
Good job, but you forgot baby Moses!
How's THAT for an obscure reference that probably nobody will get?
North Korean propaganda image displaying the everyday habits of us evil westerners:
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg194/scaled.php?server=194&filename=screenshot20120106at550.png&res=medium)
No no no, you're doing it wrong! You don't throw babies in the ocean!
...You grill em.
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)
Fer goddess' sake...
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)
Fer goddess' sake...
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)
Fer goddess' sake...
My apologies then.
Here's something else...
-pic snip-
I thought I'd give that second one a little update, considering no abortion would be preformed on an infant.
So, here you go. My take on that little pro-life tripe (forgive the comic sans, please):
(http://i44.tinypic.com/27yao8z.jpg)
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)It's only mistake was being so delicious.
Fer goddess' sake...
Revenge of the Fetal McNuggets!(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)It's only mistake was being so delicious.
Fer goddess' sake...
(http://www.barking-moonbat.com/images/uploads/fairington_042207.jpg)"Forbidden" :-[
(http://www.barking-moonbat.com/images/uploads/fairington_042207.jpg)Re-hosted for your convenience.
Or that infants are delicious.
Maybe it's a different Awlaki, but isn't he the man who defected from the United States to join Al-Qaeda?
Yeah, you get no sympathy from me, traitor.
I think it has a point, that killing American citizens without a trial is wrong.
However, that doesn't excuse the creator from the fact that he's being a douchenozzle.
You know something? I am. I recognize my country has flaws. I am perfectly willing to accept that other nations are better than mine in a variety of ways. I'm pissed at corruption, gays being denied rights, economic woes. I see every scar, wrinkle and pock on the face of America.
I love it anyway.
You want to mock me for it, go ahead, but I am a patriot regardless of its imperfections.
I think it has a point, that killing American citizens without a trial is wrong.
However, that doesn't excuse the creator from the fact that he's being a douchenozzle.
I think it has a point, that killing American citizens without a trial is wrong.
However, that doesn't excuse the creator from the fact that he's being a douchenozzle.
I would take this a step further and say that killing anyone (whose not armed and on the field of battle of course) without trial is wrong. We should have taken every chance possible to give Bin Laden a "fair" trail (how fair can it be really?). Yeah, I'm not losing sleep over his death, but I think it speaks volumes to the rest of the world that we are a people of law how act and abide by it (even if it does have flaws). I think it only tarnishes our moral high ground to not give them a trial. Even more so with Al-Awlaki because he's an American citizen.
In either case, Bin Laden, Al-Awlaki, or anyone else affiliated with Al-Qaeda/terrorism, I'm not going to complain if/when die. I just think it would be the moral thing to do to give them a trial.
Also, post 150! :D
Maybe it's a different Awlaki, but isn't he the man who defected from the United States to join Al-Qaeda?Nope, that was actually his son (http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/25/death-of-u-s-teenager-in-drone-strike-stokes-debate/). And for that, he must also die. Sins of the father and whatnot.
Yeah, you get no sympathy from me, traitor.
Maybe it's a different Awlaki, but isn't he the man who defected from the United States to join Al-Qaeda?Nope, that was actually his son (http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/25/death-of-u-s-teenager-in-drone-strike-stokes-debate/). And for that, he must also die. Sins of the father and whatnot.
Yeah, you get no sympathy from me, traitor.
That was more sarcasm because of the jingoists who actually believe that stuff, not really directed at you personally :)Uh... ok, no, I don't support killing the family of a defector.Maybe it's a different Awlaki, but isn't he the man who defected from the United States to join Al-Qaeda?Nope, that was actually his son (http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/25/death-of-u-s-teenager-in-drone-strike-stokes-debate/). And for that, he must also die. Sins of the father and whatnot.
Yeah, you get no sympathy from me, traitor.
This is supposed to be a pro-life cartoon.No, she can't. At least not round these here parts. Why? A TODDLER CAN'T GET PREGNANT! Even then, she needs parental approval. Fuck.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/310926_10150292274356033_60465441032_8002972_2083099935_n.jpg)
You know something? I am. I recognize my country has flaws. I am perfectly willing to accept that other nations are better than mine in a variety of ways. I'm pissed at corruption, gays being denied rights, economic woes. I see every scar, wrinkle and pock on the face of America.
I love it anyway.
You want to mock me for it, go ahead, but I am a patriot regardless of its imperfections.
I don't hate America at all, I just hate how much the corrupt asshats in charge have screwed it up.
(http://i.imgur.com/qP2nk.gif)But illegal under federal law still. Which means even in Cali, where medical marijuana is legal, the feds can still raid a place that dispenses it. (I was going to say "raid the joint" but, well, you know...)
Can't... tell if good or bad... But considering medical marijuana is legal in some states...
Considering the person who made the cartoon. lolI'm familiar with Cox & Forkum. They're in favor of same-sex marriage, support the separation of church and state, and they're pro-choice. From what I understand they don't do political cartoons anymore though.
(http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/03.15.09.Stimulus.gif)(click to show/hide)
You know something? I am. I recognize my country has flaws. I am perfectly willing to accept that other nations are better than mine in a variety of ways. I'm pissed at corruption, gays being denied rights, economic woes. I see every scar, wrinkle and pock on the face of America.
I love it anyway.
You want to mock me for it, go ahead, but I am a patriot regardless of its imperfections.
I will thanks.I don't hate America at all, I just hate how much the corrupt asshats in charge have screwed it up.
I do hate America. But don't take it personally, I hate all states.
I love the flowery rhetoric of our dirt old papers written 200 years ago. That's what I like.You know something? I am. I recognize my country has flaws. I am perfectly willing to accept that other nations are better than mine in a variety of ways. I'm pissed at corruption, gays being denied rights, economic woes. I see every scar, wrinkle and pock on the face of America.
I love it anyway.
You want to mock me for it, go ahead, but I am a patriot regardless of its imperfections.
I will thanks.I don't hate America at all, I just hate how much the corrupt asshats in charge have screwed it up.
I do hate America. But don't take it personally, I hate all states.
Oh, alright. If you hate all nations, that's fine. :P
In fairness... "lol anti-nationalist." ;)
EDIT: In all honestly, I'm not sure how to describe it. I have a dysfunctional relationship with the States... yeah, it's fucked up from time to time, but... I like it. I can't articulate it very well. Sorry. :(
(http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb0214cd20120213081006.jpg)The fuck? What does... have to do w... No.
You know something? I am. I recognize my country has flaws. I am perfectly willing to accept that other nations are better than mine in a variety of ways. I'm pissed at corruption, gays being denied rights, economic woes. I see every scar, wrinkle and pock on the face of America.
I love it anyway.
You want to mock me for it, go ahead, but I am a patriot regardless of its imperfections.
I will thanks.I don't hate America at all, I just hate how much the corrupt asshats in charge have screwed it up.
I do hate America. But don't take it personally, I hate all states.
Oh, alright. If you hate all nations, that's fine. :P
In fairness... "lol anti-nationalist." ;)
EDIT: In all honestly, I'm not sure how to describe it. I have a dysfunctional relationship with the States... yeah, it's fucked up from time to time, but... I like it. I can't articulate it very well. Sorry. :(
Because government mandated health care infringes on their rights to deny health care to people they don't like?
(http://mylordkatie.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/abortion-slave-cartoon.jpg)
(http://www.pappasontaxes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/tax-cartoon.jpg)
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR9ZSZJm9eCtqE6ARkdsvC5G4aUCwMVymKDn6crWEk6rbeDhQf57jgGzUrp)
feel free to vomit
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR9ZSZJm9eCtqE6ARkdsvC5G4aUCwMVymKDn6crWEk6rbeDhQf57jgGzUrp)NO!
feel free to vomit
Uh, they do realize that it is private health insurance that is always trying to reduce benefits and deny coverage, right?HOW DARE YOU TRY TO INTERFERE WITH THE FREE MARKET!?!?!?!? WHAT KIND OF COMMUNIST ARE YOU? /paultard
In all seriousness, I am befuddled at the fears I was hearing from people for awhile.Uh, they do realize that it is private health insurance that is always trying to reduce benefits and deny coverage, right?HOW DARE YOU TRY TO INTERFERE WITH THE FREE MARKET!?!?!?!? WHAT KIND OF COMMUNIST ARE YOU? /paultard
I'm not saying government-run care would be better... I just don't see how it could be worse!Just ask that one British lady who had to wait and wait after one critically ill person after another got surgery while her own moderate condition was waiting! It was horrible!
"Now you'll have to wait forever to get a procedure done!" Just last week I saw a report on an insurance company essentially killing someone through this method.I love this arguement, given the fact that they ignore for the most part that the most serious issues are dealt with right away,if you have to can't have it done in the country, you can have in done in another country, and your country will cover the charges and there are private practices and such in a lot of the countries that have universal healthcare and you can always go to one of them and pay out of pocket.
It would be more accurate if he were in a Sith robe...
This is one of my favorite posts! ;DI'm not saying government-run care would be better... I just don't see how it could be worse!Just ask that one British lady who had to wait and wait after one critically ill person after another got surgery while her own moderate condition was waiting! It was horrible!
(http://jasonaclark.com/wp-content/uploads/universalhealthcarecartoon.jpg)
(http://jasonaclark.com/wp-content/uploads/universalhealthcarecartoon.jpg)
This cartoon would go from "worst" to "best" if it was re-labeled "Private Health Care".
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/205/2012/02/16/106530_600.jpg)
yes, because everyone on welfare is druggie ::)
(http://i937.photobucket.com/albums/ad220/mrtraffic97/tumblr_lz6v3puxGE1qz80pso1_500.jpg)Wait people actually praised the troops for doing that
(http://i43.tinypic.com/jzxkz7.jpg)
(http://i.abimg.net/images/answers/9/1/11850659.jpg?1329597800a)Those kids look pretty cool. I'd hang out with them.
Not to mention I wouldn't be surprised if those kids (at least I'm assuming they're teenagers and not adults) either have jobs or will get jobs eventually.
Oh, but they look "ghetto", so obviously they're welfare kids 9_9
The classism in this country is so obscene it is physically painful.
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg811/scaled.php?server=811&filename=dd395splitsite.jpg&res=medium)
So... Bill Gates is half-zombie, and will vaccinate black kids in a skull pit while a door floats behind them?
It also wouldn't go over well in Africa, where Billy has been fighting disease for years, and successfully I might add.I have issues w/ some of M$'s business practices, but even I know Bill Gates tries to give back and I will not enjoy seeing him, well, "dissed".
LOL, that comic would not go over well here in WA. Mostly because Microsoft supplies massive amounts of jobs to the community and has done a lot of good here.
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lz4sa6NauW1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzmf7oTQ661r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
Is it bad that my first impression of the big pill was of Viagra?
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzkf2wvvyy1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzmf7oTQ661r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
I totally read that as "Count Blacula" and said aloud "wow, that comic doesn't shy away from racism."
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/153/2012/02/17/106563_600.jpg)Who thought Obama as a stereotypical African sacrificing rich to a volcano was a good idea (are there even volcanoes in Africa)
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/153/2012/02/17/106563_600.jpg)Who thought Obama as a stereotypical African sacrificing rich to a volcano was a good idea (are there even volcanoes in Africa)
In other news, a child sacrificed the Atlantic ocean today when he removed a bucketful of a water for his sand castle's mote.hehehe. Mote.
Derp. In my defence, I'm ridiculously tired right now. :P
yes, there are volcaones in Africa. I believe Kilomanjaro used to be one? someone correct me if I'm wrong on that (I probably am)
Who thought Obama as a stereotypical African sacrificing rich to a volcano was a good idea (are there even volcanoes in Africa)
Are you sure this cartoon isn't secretly pro-obama (kind of like a poe) to the extent of the huge amount of hyperbole in referring to higher taxes as the same as being sacrificed in a volcano? And the blatantly racist depiction of Obama
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzmf7oTQ661r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
I'd think so...but, that begs the question...what would happen if an atheist became a vampire?
There are several versions about using holy symbols against vampires in fiction.
In some cases it only works if the vampire was/is a follower of that religion but I prefer the version where the wielder of the symbol is the one whos' faith matters.
I think there is a book where a soviet commissar realises that his cross won't work because he is an atheist so he drives away the vampire using a communist symbol. (Either some book or some commissarial symbol, I forget which.) Oh and some rich yuppie banishes vampires by using his wallet since money is the thing that he has devoted his life to.
There are several versions about using holy symbols against vampires in fiction.The soviet commisar thing happened in Doctor Who once, but I'm sure it's been recycled several times
In some cases it only works if the vampire was/is a follower of that religion but I prefer the version where the wielder of the symbol is the one whos' faith matters.
I think there is a book where a soviet commissar realises that his cross won't work because he is an atheist so he drives away the vampire using a communist symbol. (Either some book or some commissarial symbol, I forget which.) Oh and some rich yuppie banishes vampires by using his wallet since money is the thing that he has devoted his life to.
I like the faith of the person with the object mattering more. It shows that the person's faith in something greater than themself is more powerful than the dominating presence of the vampire.There are several versions about using holy symbols against vampires in fiction.
In some cases it only works if the vampire was/is a follower of that religion but I prefer the version where the wielder of the symbol is the one whos' faith matters.
I think there is a book where a soviet commissar realises that his cross won't work because he is an atheist so he drives away the vampire using a communist symbol. (Either some book or some commissarial symbol, I forget which.) Oh and some rich yuppie banishes vampires by using his wallet since money is the thing that he has devoted his life to.
There is pony related nonsense in spoilers. I swear it's relevant to the quoted post, but I just wanted to toss it into spoilers to try to decrease the chances of a derail going on. Hell, posting an actual political cartoon would probably help, but I don't have the time to find one because I'm getting ready for school right now.(click to show/hide)
*cough*
Anyway, I swear that I'll add pictures to this thread some day. We get lots of bad political cartoons in my newspaper. I just have to go and actually find the sources online after I see them. Barring that, I could scan them. :P
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)......................REALLY?!
So if someone is a follower of Thor, does this mean they can carry around a hammer and use that as both a holy symbol and a weapon?
</philosoraptor>
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)
I like the faith of the person with the object mattering more. It shows that the person's faith in something greater than themself is more powerful than the dominating presence of the vampire.There are several versions about using holy symbols against vampires in fiction.
In some cases it only works if the vampire was/is a follower of that religion but I prefer the version where the wielder of the symbol is the one whos' faith matters.
I think there is a book where a soviet commissar realises that his cross won't work because he is an atheist so he drives away the vampire using a communist symbol. (Either some book or some commissarial symbol, I forget which.) Oh and some rich yuppie banishes vampires by using his wallet since money is the thing that he has devoted his life to.
There is pony related nonsense in spoilers. I swear it's relevant to the quoted post, but I just wanted to toss it into spoilers to try to decrease the chances of a derail going on. Hell, posting an actual political cartoon would probably help, but I don't have the time to find one because I'm getting ready for school right now.(click to show/hide)
*cough*
Anyway, I swear that I'll add pictures to this thread some day. We get lots of bad political cartoons in my newspaper. I just have to go and actually find the sources online after I see them. Barring that, I could scan them. :P
PONY SPOILER(click to show/hide)
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)
That comic is creepy. Is it by Chick or sommat?
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)How odd. I have a ton of people praying for Jake Ballard to fix his ACL. Yet... God fucked up his ACL for...?
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)Damn. What does that mean Bruce Wayne did as a kid, huh?
Damn. What does that mean Bruce Wayne did as a kid, huh?
Damn. What does that mean Bruce Wayne did as a kid, huh?
He touched himself at night, of course.
Actually, I didn't consider the pedophilic potential of that picture until after I posted my message :S That's some disturbing latent pedophilia there.I don't see any latent pædophilic images. The closest I can see is the bare-ass spanking and the 'spanking for being naughty' sentence, but that's positively looking for something.
Actually, I didn't consider the pedophilic potential of that picture until after I posted my message :S That's some disturbing latent pedophilia there.I don't see any latent pædophilic images. The closest I can see is the bare-ass spanking and the 'spanking for being naughty' sentence, but that's positively looking for something.
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg835/scaled.php?server=835&filename=jesusspank.jpg&res=medium)
Do you want some fries with that chicken baby?
The USPATRIOT Act is just an attack on American civil liberties that was only passed due to ridiculous scaremongering and propaganda that's like ten years old.
When is that comic from?
Betcha anything if the NYPD was spying on Christians who had expressed a desire to bomb an abortion clinic, and in fact were preparing to do so and got caught in the act, said political cartoon would've been talking about how oppressive the police are.And if the police wouldn't have observed someone who eventually ended up committing a bombing, the cartoon would have raged at the incompetent coppers. There's just no pleasing everyone.
Betcha anything if the NYPD was spying on Christians who had expressed a desire to bomb an abortion clinic, and in fact were preparing to do so and got caught in the act, said political cartoon would've been talking about how oppressive the police are.And if the police wouldn't have observed someone who eventually ended up committing a bombing, the cartoon would have raged at the incompetent coppers. There's just no pleasing everyone.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc1/6011_107834958236_64929798236_2383966_5653011_n.jpg)
(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzv797Bwgt1qzc68q.jpg)
Snip
Just saw this one story arc where Umbert is running for fetus president against "Joyce". Umbert is pro-life and Joyce is pro-choice. After many bad puns, it is strongly implied Joyce gets aborted.
(http://victoriadelsoul.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/enhancedinterrogation.gif)
(http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzr2fgDqxm1r34dg8o1_500.jpg)
Did I mention that that cartoon also won a Pulitzer?
Did I mention that that cartoon also won a Pulitzer?
You're kidding.
Chad's one wins.
Why is it seemingly impossible for political cartoonists to draw a public figure with realistic proportions? Why does every person have to look like an exaggerated caricature of what an actual person would look like?Because political cartoons are meant to be caricatures.
If they were all done in proportion with lifelike figures, all the cartoons would look like Mary Worth.The last thing I need is more Mary Worth in the paper. That insufferable shrew!
And he's also stupid on other issues.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc1/6011_107834958236_64929798236_2383966_5653011_n.jpg)
I really don't get this argument. One of the largest complaints against insurance companies is THIS EXACT THING. So basically what would happen is, nothing would change except your procedure would be guaranteed. How is this bad?
And he's also stupid on other issues.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc1/6011_107834958236_64929798236_2383966_5653011_n.jpg)
Is this from the same school of genius that ran with the whole 'Stephen Hawking would have died had he been British and treated by the NHS' (He is and he was)?
Did I mention that that cartoon also won a Pulitzer?
You're kidding.
When?
That sign is from the 1980s right?
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m089l5WIfD1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)I feel this might be a case of lost aesop since I think the cartoonist is saying the US needs to do more for Syria but the popcorn makes it seem that obama is enjoying the killing
Moar Mike Adams.
(http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/Alien-Mind-Wipe_600.jpg)
The article is equally stupid. http://www.naturalnews.com/029656_psychiatric_drugs_medicine.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/029656_psychiatric_drugs_medicine.html)
Try getting a skinhead to actually admit he's racist first. Or doesn't like Jewish people. Or black people. I've run into a few people who insist it's just a fashion genre.I've only read the thread up to this post but I want to say that having a shaved head doesn't mean your racist. I know of people who are going bald pretty young and would rather just shave it all off than have patches of hair. Other people might do it because the don't want to bother with hair. Also in this economy think of the money you would save on shampoo(jk on that one). I may be misreading what you said but it seems your judging someone on their appearance, which is exactly what racists do, and such a comment seems unlike you Shane.
Although I think identification as a skinhead is more than simply a shaved head. I would have thought shaved head Doc Martens and bomber jackets.
Personally I have a shaved head (balding) but am quite obviously not a skinhead. Crewcuts (shaved heads) became pretty fashionable in the 90s but its still different from being a skinhead.
Try getting a skinhead to actually admit he's racist first. Or doesn't like Jewish people. Or black people. I've run into a few people who insist it's just a fashion genre.I've only read the thread up to this post but I want to say that having a shaved head doesn't mean your racist. I know of people who are going bald pretty young and would rather just shave it all off than have patches of hair. Other people might do it because the don't want to bother with hair. Also in this economy think of the money you would save on shampoo(jk on that one). I may be misreading what you said but it seems your judging someone on their appearance, which is exactly what racists do, and such a comment seems unlike you Shane.
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m089l5WIfD1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)Funny, I don't see any Republicans giving a shit, I only see them caring about women's vaginas
Try getting a skinhead to actually admit he's racist first. Or doesn't like Jewish people. Or black people. I've run into a few people who insist it's just a fashion genre.I've only read the thread up to this post but I want to say that having a shaved head doesn't mean your racist. I know of people who are going bald pretty young and would rather just shave it all off than have patches of hair. Other people might do it because the don't want to bother with hair. Also in this economy think of the money you would save on shampoo(jk on that one). I may be misreading what you said but it seems your judging someone on their appearance, which is exactly what racists do, and such a comment seems unlike you Shane.
Wow, blast from the past a la mode.
Except I never mentioned just a shaved head (besides y'know 'skinhead'). Skinheads have a more specific way of finding them out than just a shaved head.
While there may be some skinheads that stay with the original definition more often than not you've run into a racist.
If you run into a guy wearing combat trousers (most often camouflage), along with a white tank top (sometimes it is black or olive green) or a regular white, black, olive green t-shirt, and suspenders then a cabbie hat, finished off with black combat boots then you have run into the racist version of a skinhead. They also may or may not have a flight jacket on (don't want their arms getting cold or to hide their racist/white power tats).
This is, of course, from general experience as well as what I've seen on the various neo-nazi/skinhead sites that I have the displeasure of running into thanks to looking at the mainpage.
I never thought I'd have to explain this two months later.
You're also assuming I'm judging right off the bat from what I see someone wearing. No. It has to do with a lot of factors that I wish not to explain right now.
Moar Mike Adams.
(http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/Alien-Mind-Wipe_600.jpg)
The article is equally stupid. http://www.naturalnews.com/029656_psychiatric_drugs_medicine.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/029656_psychiatric_drugs_medicine.html)
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxkekrPCkX1r8kiyko1_500.gif)Wonder if anyone ever told him we've had jets land with worse damage than that?
Not sure if possible for F22s(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxkekrPCkX1r8kiyko1_500.gif)Wonder if anyone ever told him we've had jets land with worse damage than that?
An entire wing? No. A-10s are the ones built to take that kind of a beating.Not sure if possible for F22s(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxkekrPCkX1r8kiyko1_500.gif)Wonder if anyone ever told him we've had jets land with worse damage than that?
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/423837_279501255455040_277491422322690_709631_2102968195_n.jpg)Two things
1. JK Rowling actually abused welfare and llook where it got her point is sometimes you can use it to accomplish great things.That's... not a great argument.
I know1. JK Rowling actually abused welfare and llook where it got her point is sometimes you can use it to accomplish great things.That's... not a great argument.
Moar Mike Adams.
(http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/Alien-Mind-Wipe_600.jpg)
The article is equally stupid. http://www.naturalnews.com/029656_psychiatric_drugs_medicine.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/029656_psychiatric_drugs_medicine.html)
Poor aliens, they're too cute to be in a stupid paranoid conspiracy theory comic.
I also noticed that the insignia on the reptile-aliens' uniforms is a star of David.Ah yes the there's snow therefore no climate change argument
Also, global warming denialist chick tracts:
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1075/1075_01.asp (http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1075/1075_01.asp)
Does anyone else wonder if Jack Chick really believes this stuff?I honestly dunno
You have to wonder.Does anyone else wonder if Jack Chick really believes this stuff?I honestly dunno
it could be making stuff up for cash
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)Indeed.
Fer goddess' sake...
I think its refering to late term, or partial birth abortions(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)Indeed.
Fer goddess' sake...
There is no place on earth where it is legal to kill babies.
I think its refering to late term, or partial birth abortions(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyj3h8P8ab1ronxvxo1_500.jpg)Indeed.
Fer goddess' sake...
There is no place on earth where it is legal to kill babies.
...Of course, these folks are aghast that one would consider a grown woman's life more valuable than a newborn baby's.
Her life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Her life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Not to mention that, from a less humanistic approach and a more mechanical approach, a living woman capable of bearing more children (unless said children would threaten her life) is more beneficial to the survival of the species than a single child whose life caused the death of their mother and then has to wait 15 years to reach sexual maturity.
Her life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Not to mention that, from a less humanistic approach and a more mechanical approach, a living woman capable of bearing more children (unless said children would threaten her life) is more beneficial to the survival of the species than a single child whose life caused the death of their mother and then has to wait 15 years to reach sexual maturity.
Yeah, but then that gives overpopulation, which is bad. We should focus on sustainability instead of doing with the rabbits and insects do.
(http://d3m4ov3yle2f1w.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kn030112dAPR20120229044531.jpg)
Her life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Not to mention that, from a less humanistic approach and a more mechanical approach, a living woman capable of bearing more children (unless said children would threaten her life) is more beneficial to the survival of the species than a single child whose life caused the death of their mother and then has to wait 15 years to reach sexual maturity.
Yeah, but then that gives overpopulation, which is bad. We should focus on sustainability instead of doing with the rabbits and insects do.
(http://d3m4ov3yle2f1w.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kn030112dAPR20120229044531.jpg)
I would say if the cartoonist knows how islamophobic this is then i realized he doesHer life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Not to mention that, from a less humanistic approach and a more mechanical approach, a living woman capable of bearing more children (unless said children would threaten her life) is more beneficial to the survival of the species than a single child whose life caused the death of their mother and then has to wait 15 years to reach sexual maturity.
Yeah, but then that gives overpopulation, which is bad. We should focus on sustainability instead of doing with the rabbits and insects do.
(http://d3m4ov3yle2f1w.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kn030112dAPR20120229044531.jpg)
Her life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Not to mention that, from a less humanistic approach and a more mechanical approach, a living woman capable of bearing more children (unless said children would threaten her life) is more beneficial to the survival of the species than a single child whose life caused the death of their mother and then has to wait 15 years to reach sexual maturity.
Yeah, but then that gives overpopulation, which is bad. We should focus on sustainability instead of doing with the rabbits and insects do.
(http://d3m4ov3yle2f1w.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kn030112dAPR20120229044531.jpg)
Her life is more valuable than the baby because she has actually lived, has friends and family, possible a job or hobby, and is a contributor to society. It may sound harsh but that's life. But I do think you should save both.
Not to mention that, from a less humanistic approach and a more mechanical approach, a living woman capable of bearing more children (unless said children would threaten her life) is more beneficial to the survival of the species than a single child whose life caused the death of their mother and then has to wait 15 years to reach sexual maturity.
Yeah, but then that gives overpopulation, which is bad. We should focus on sustainability instead of doing with the rabbits and insects do.
(http://d3m4ov3yle2f1w.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kn030112dAPR20120229044531.jpg)
There's a different version of that that has to do with women's rights. I swear it's the same exact comic but with different dialogue.
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0fjfvXAhu1r63hf8o1_500.gif)
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0d48fMf4M1r8kiyko1_500.gif)
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0dbiieRwS1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m088v70Iam1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
I don't make a habit of remembering the names of political cartoonists, no.
Quote(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0d48fMf4M1r8kiyko1_500.gif)Quote(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0dbiieRwS1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
Quote(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0d48fMf4M1r8kiyko1_500.gif)Quote(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0dbiieRwS1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
So, basically this is saying that only women benefit from tax-supported contraceptives as a form of preventative medicine... who exactly are these women having sex with if not men!?
Or is it simply that women should happily live in a paradoxical world where if they don't have sex they get raped, and if they do have sex they get pregnant, but they're still expected to be available to men, because men having sex is normal and necessary?
Actually, she wasn't asking for the government to pay. She was asking her university to pay (they are legally obliged to, but want to avoid it because they're Catholic).
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0fjfvXAhu1r63hf8o1_500.gif)
Quote(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0fjfvXAhu1r63hf8o1_500.gif)
Use of birth control, including emergency contraceptives = Responsible family planning.
Self-esteem = Choosing to engage in or refrain from sex based on your personal beliefs and what you want in life, rather than what other people tell you.
Reputation = Only important if it's based upon traits that actually matter. Whether or not a woman enjoys sex shouldn't factor in to the amount of respect people show her.
And it's interesting how we don't see all that many cartoons talking about men taking responsibility when it comes to sex.
I'd like to think the artist is just jealous and that none of these so called loose women want to sleep with him.
Joking aside, they're abhorent.
(http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/417283_2949884422047_1109432743_38245613_1395672324_n.jpg)
Ever notice how the extreme right believes liberals are mirror images of themselves?
Eyeballs don't do that.
I'd like to think the artist is just jealous and that none of these so called loose women want to sleep with him.
Joking aside, they're abhorent.
"Women are sluts unless they're sleeping with me"
I'd like to think the artist is just jealous and that none of these so called loose women want to sleep with him.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/421226_382302038464625_100000544962457_1367742_1477742172_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/421226_382302038464625_100000544962457_1367742_1477742172_n.jpg)
FUCKIN RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0h60ayB1a1rnw5qjo1_500.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0h60ayB1a1rnw5qjo1_500.jpg)
Is this a parody?
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0h60ayB1a1rnw5qjo1_500.jpg)
Is this a parody?
God, I hope so. If it is, I can't tell.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0h60ayB1a1rnw5qjo1_500.jpg)Translation: A girl broke up with me, even after I bought her stuff. Bitch. /bitter
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0h60ayB1a1rnw5qjo1_500.jpg)Translation: A girl broke up with me, even after I bought her stuff. Bitch. /bitter
Actually it's a joke, the artist is female, her name is Kate Beaton, of the 'Hark A Vagrant' comics.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxagzqNnwO1qdenbvo1_500.jpg)
Is it just me, or does Richard Dawkins in that comic look like he's holding back a horrible case of diarrhea?He looks like Sarah Palin to me. Not necessarily saying no on the diarrhea.
Is it just me, or does Richard Dawkins in that comic look like he's holding back a horrible case of diarrhea?A painfully bad case of the vapors, at the very least.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/428593_2853179284479_1109432743_32168420_1835097439_n.jpg)
About the time Catholics took issue with something the scary Kenyan said, would be my guess.(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/428593_2853179284479_1109432743_32168420_1835097439_n.jpg)
I'm rather curious as to when our Evangelistic Protestant Majority suddenly started going "STOP PERSECUTING THE CATHOLICS!"
(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/422157_3212618887795_1635972336_2751936_2129507491_n.jpg)
Isn't this from Jeff Rense's site or something?
Speaking of which, this thread needs moar A. Wyatt Mann
http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image05.jpg]]http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image05.jpg (http://)
Speaking of which, this thread needs moar A. Wyatt Mann
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image05.jpg)
"Revenge of the Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina" sounds fucking awesome.
Revenge of the Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina? I think I have that one... it's next to Godzilla Vs. Dildoron!
Revenge of the Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina? I think I have that one... it's next to Godzilla Vs. Dildoron!
You have intrigued my dracophilia.
I don’t visit the main page much any more, so I do not know if this person is still around, but I know there is/was a commenter that started using the handle “Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina” shortly after that was posted. Made it a bit more memorable to me.
I agree - that is some sweet brickwork. On the other hand, in the last cartoon Ed looks rather like Gordon.
I don’t visit the main page much any more, so I do not know if this person is still around, but I know there is/was a commenter that started using the handle “Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina” shortly after that was posted. Made it a bit more memorable to me.
That's why I remembered it as well.
How about some Paul Thomas? Cartoonist for the Daily Express. He's obssessed with brickwork detail, shit jokes, can only draw people with one look on their faces, his women look like men... the site Mail Watch has a 500 page thread for discussing his suckiness...
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-03-07 - here's some great brickwork
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-02-28 - and this one
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-02-23 heres a great Eurozone joke
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-02-13 his mps always look like this
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-02-03 yay whenever short on a joke fall back on the weather!
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-02-01 another classic Thomas design...the "2 people walking past a billboard in the middle of nowhere and commenting on it" copypasta
http://www.express.co.uk/cartoon/view/2012-01-23 I love how he lacks faith in his political caricatures to the point where he has to put a L rossette on Ed Miliband...
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m04a4ojjjj1qj64ujo1_500.jpg)
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m04a4ojjjj1qj64ujo1_500.jpg (http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m04a4ojjjj1qj64ujo1_500.jpg)
Everything is simple if you construct a straw man version of it.
"It's simple if you don't think about it!" - Sheogorath
"It's simple if you don't think about it!" - Sheogorath
Knew there was a reason I liked that Daedric Prince.
http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/427477_288393147898727_137885376282839_699450_2071260064_n.jpg
Quotehttp://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/427477_288393147898727_137885376282839_699450_2071260064_n.jpg
Holy shit; is it just me or do I see racism in this one?
As for the other two in that post... I don't really see "worst" as much as I see "conservative". There is a distinction.
Quotehttp://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/427477_288393147898727_137885376282839_699450_2071260064_n.jpg
Holy shit; is it just me or do I see racism in this one?
As for the other two in that post... I don't really see "worst" as much as I see "conservative". There is a distinction.
Lever letting it down...You know, I just call it like I see it, and well the Republican party have proven time and time again that they ARE those things.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/425213_291577880913587_137885376282839_706646_274620460_n.jpg)
Quotehttp://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/427477_288393147898727_137885376282839_699450_2071260064_n.jpg
Holy shit; is it just me or do I see racism in this one?
As for the other two in that post... I don't really see "worst" as much as I see "conservative". There is a distinction.
It's just you - the women in the picture is meant to be Sandra Fluke - the college student who complained about the costs of birth control
Edit: I like the middle one the idea that republicans only fail by their own lofty moral standards. Which is really hilarious but I suspect unintentionally so.
Quotehttp://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/427477_288393147898727_137885376282839_699450_2071260064_n.jpg
Holy shit; is it just me or do I see racism in this one?
As for the other two in that post... I don't really see "worst" as much as I see "conservative". There is a distinction.
It's just you - the women in the picture is meant to be Sandra Fluke - the college student who complained about the costs of birth control
Edit: I like the middle one the idea that republicans only fail by their own lofty moral standards. Which is really hilarious but I suspect unintentionally so.
Then why the fuck did they make Sandra look like a Latina girl? She's quite clearly white.
I thought they were a mix of White and Native American.
They need to have it reversed with the elephant screaming "communist!", "socialist!", "Marxist!", "anti-American!", "terrorist!", "queer-lover!", "n****r-lover!", etc. at the donkey.Lever letting it down...You know, I just call it like I see it, and well the Republican party have proven time and time again that they ARE those things.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/425213_291577880913587_137885376282839_706646_274620460_n.jpg)
(http://www.burlingtonderailed.com/media/1/20091121-Obamas-Debt-Star.gif)
Nicki, I'm not even going to quote your first picture because I don't want that in my post, but when I saw that my jaw dropped. I don't even know what to say about such a proud display of racism (fuck, five minutes ago, I didn't think anyone would be so bold/stupid as to publicly display something like that).
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v158/Entertainer13/Politics/320719_284495564922534_142326439139.jpg)
Lever letting it down...
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/425213_291577880913587_137885376282839_706646_274620460_n.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v158/Entertainer13/Politics/320719_284495564922534_142326439139.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423755_363437887010690_100000334464885_1224034_1019294335_n.jpg)
We're just going to have to disagree on foreign policy, I think, considering how night and day Obama and Paul are in that regard. :p(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v158/Entertainer13/Politics/320719_284495564922534_142326439139.jpg)
Ron Paul is a liar. He's also crazy, though his foreign policy is much better than Obama's. His economic policy is just catastrophically bad. And his civil liberties policy is quite good, too.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423755_363437887010690_100000334464885_1224034_1019294335_n.jpg)
We're just going to have to disagree on foreign policy, I think, considering how night and day Obama and Paul are in that regard. :p(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v158/Entertainer13/Politics/320719_284495564922534_142326439139.jpg)
Ron Paul is a liar. He's also crazy, though his foreign policy is much better than Obama's. His economic policy is just catastrophically bad. And his civil liberties policy is quite good, too.
He would also close Guantanamo, release all innocent people currently held illegally by the United States and stop criminal assassinations by the US government. He'd even probably release a bunch of nonviolent drug offenders. Sure, he'd do these things for insane reasons, but they're still good.
I'm not saying he should be president. I'm saying Obama shouldn't.
He would also close Guantanamo, release all innocent people currently held illegally by the United States and stop criminal assassinations by the US government. He'd even probably release a bunch of nonviolent drug offenders. Sure, he'd do these things for insane reasons, but they're still good.
I'm not saying he should be president. I'm saying Obama shouldn't.
This isn't about Obama vs. Paul. Frankly they're both shitty candidates. My point is that both of them are massive hypocrites so picking between them is like being caught between Iraq and a hard place.
It's sort of a hot-button issue for me because my dad has decided that the only things that matter to him are 1) becoming an isolationist country and 2) weed - and fuck everyone else. He justifies it under the banner of "protecting civil liberties."
He would also close Guantanamo, release all innocent people currently held illegally by the United States and stop criminal assassinations by the US government. He'd even probably release a bunch of nonviolent drug offenders. Sure, he'd do these things for insane reasons, but they're still good.
I'm not saying he should be president. I'm saying Obama shouldn't.
This isn't about Obama vs. Paul. Frankly they're both shitty candidates. My point is that both of them are massive hypocrites so picking between them is like being caught between Iraq and a hard place.
It's sort of a hot-button issue for me because my dad has decided that the only things that matter to him are 1) becoming an isolationist country and 2) weed - and fuck everyone else. He justifies it under the banner of "protecting civil liberties."
Doesn't your dad like Social Security?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423755_363437887010690_100000334464885_1224034_1019294335_n.jpg)
I love the idea of “Oh, we can free ourselves from these annoying checks and balances just by passing a law that says our other laws are immune from them.” I don’t think that is gonna fly.
I love the idea of “Oh, we can free ourselves from these annoying checks and balances just by passing a law that says our other laws are immune from them.” I don’t think that is gonna fly.
I almost want Ron Paul to get elected, just to see the Supreme Court bitchslap him down.
Lever letting it down...
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/425213_291577880913587_137885376282839_706646_274620460_n.jpg)
(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/389248_3021605495029_1109432743_38272987_1626112541_n.jpg)how is this anti Obama?
It was actually on a TV show. Carson's TV show, I seem to remember.
I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.Emphasis mine
Emphasis changed to highlight the actual context and meaning.It was actually on a TV show. Carson's TV show, I seem to remember.
It was on CNN, actually... on Wolf Blitzer's show.
http://articles.cnn.com/1999-03-09/politics/president.2000_transcript.gore_1_21st-century-american-people-shadow/2?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICSQuoteI've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.Emphasis mine
(http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/6/8/7/27687.jpg?v=1)You're arguing... Noah's ark?
(http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/6/8/7/27687.jpg?v=1)
(http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/6/8/7/27687.jpg?v=1)
(http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/6/8/7/27687.jpg?v=1)
Atheissimo, you ignorant slut, you're bringing logic into this? Logic is so last year.
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/62/2012/03/15/108271_600.jpg)
Because if either party is stuck in the past, it's clearly the Democrats. ::)
Edit: Also, that car is fucked up, and the baby should be in a rear-facing car seat.
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/62/2012/03/15/108271_600.jpg)
Is it just me, or is the only way the right wing seems to be able to argue against the contraceptive mandate is to lie about? From what i understand, doesn't it require insurance companies to basically say "Hey Female Employees, your corporate policy is X, but for $Y a month you can add plan Z that covers birth control"?
How is decent birth control coverage supposed to be a turnoff to a modern woman? Most use birth control in some form, so they can worry about other things like providing for their families and careers/jobs.
At least the political cartoonist actually did SOME research into the Sandra Fluke case.
The problem is that he took said research, folded it hapharzardly, and held up the mess and said "Look, I madez a boat! <_>"
Our friend Jon McNaughton, the artist behind this piece of joy (http://www.mcnaughtonart.com/artwork/view_zoom/?artpiece_id=353) has a new painting:
(http://wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/obamaconstitution.jpg)
entitled "One Nation Under Socialism"
Our friend Jon McNaughton, the artist behind this piece of joy (http://www.mcnaughtonart.com/artwork/view_zoom/?artpiece_id=353) has a new painting:
(http://wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/obamaconstitution.jpg)
entitled "One Nation Under Socialism"
It looks like he's holding up the burning Constitution and scolding, "BAD neocons! Bad, bad, bad!"“Look what you did!” :D
It looks like he's holding up the burning Constitution and scolding, "BAD neocons! Bad, bad, bad!"“Look what you did!” :D
Ehhhh, one of the legit criticisms that can be made of Obama is that he's taking just as much if not more advantage of Bush's expansion of presidential powers and denial of due process as Bush did. Handy infographic from the ACLU available here (http://www.aclulibertywatch.org/ALWCandidateReportCard.pdf). Mind you, it is fairly hypocritical to bitch about Obama doing it but not Bush (especially if you argue Bush was different), its still a valid criticism and a definite failing he's had on constitutional issues.
Ehhhh, one of the legit criticisms that can be made of Obama is that he's taking just as much if not more advantage of Bush's expansion of presidential powers and denial of due process as Bush did. Handy infographic from the ACLU available here (http://www.aclulibertywatch.org/ALWCandidateReportCard.pdf). Mind you, it is fairly hypocritical to bitch about Obama doing it but not Bush (especially if you argue Bush was different), its still a valid criticism and a definite failing he's had on constitutional issues.
Operation Spit-take: The plot to extort a whole new computer out of various FSTDTs members. I'm on to you.
Edit: Also, about the car in the cartoon, I swear, it must have taken the entire Saharan desert just to forge the front windshield. Seriously.
'Everything Government gives you was taken from someone else.'How I Get My Paycheck:
And also a little bit from you, if you pay taxes at all.
City maintenance, public services, utilities, farm subsidies, etc aside;
Paying in taxes to provide basic needs for the lower class is probably a LOT cheaper than forcing businesses to pay their employees a fair wage. ;p Big business NEEDS a large, undereducated, baby-making minimum-wage workforce to continue to churn out money.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m16l6kzsfp1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/428727_344778565565835_107087879334906_977763_2003759225_n.jpg)
No, young fellow, I like paying taxes, with them I buy civilization.Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
Why is that under "worst"? Eric Holder's the moron who's saying the drone strikes on US citizens are ok because the constitution only guarantees "due process" not "judicial process". A line of reasoning that suggest that, if there was
Don't get me wrong, I'm not crying over him, but his justification for a drone strike was... and I hope I'm not being too hyperbolic here... fascist in nature?
EDIT: To be clear, I am in no way anti-semetic, nor do I agree with the bullshit these morons say. That's not what I'm trying to say at all.
Quote(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/62/2012/03/15/108271_600.jpg)
Clearly women would much prefer the party that openly hates them
(http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/417979_369041843128160_104047926294221_1181470_1146346720_n.jpg)
(http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/533838_3055801629911_1109432743_38287675_437716275_n.jpg)
Maybe in reference when Bill Maher called Palin a cunt(http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/533838_3055801629911_1109432743_38287675_437716275_n.jpg)
1. Someone doesn't understand the"pill"
2.When did Palin get called a slut??
Oh, Palin's been called just about every bad name you can call a woman at some point or another. Never by anyone as prominent or influential as Rush Limbaugh though.How would they know how birth control works if they never use it? It's not like we have any sex ed classes to tell them...
Incidentally, do social conservatives seriously have no concept of how birth control works? I mean seriously, the first time I was ever educated about the pill was when I saw a girl taking hers on the bus in my sophomore year of high school. I asked her politely about it and her explanation included the phrase "have to take it every day, around the same time". Heck, there are even commercials for competing forms of Birth Control that mention it!
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/380649_3055624825491_1109432743_38287611_28658815_n.jpg)
Not only do conservatives swear fealty to the corporation, they do so selectively. If your company is exceptionally innovative (with almost no government tech financing), creating a technology that may just save the world- conservatives will put aside their usual views on business and hate you. Just because.
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/62/2012/03/15/108271_600.jpg)
That toon with Obama crying over Martin's grave...Makes me think what if Obama didn't say anything about Martin's death? Something like "George Bush doesn't care about black people" some years ago?
I bet you two bucks that if Obama had made a comment on a white boy being shot, no one would give a fuck.
Here's one from the University of Texas' Daily Texan regarding the Trayvon Martin murder:
(http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/assets_c/2012/03/utcartoon-thumb-555x312.jpg)
Here's one from the University of Texas' Daily Texan regarding the Trayvon Martin murder:
(http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/assets_c/2012/03/utcartoon-thumb-555x312.jpg)
And on the other side...
(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/535295_324090397657423_100001693975202_912939_1763159020_n.jpg)
Although I'm willing to bet this was made by a conservative to make people who want Zimmerman to be put to ustice look bad.
And on the other side...Not sure as the neo black panthers have called for his blood
(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/535295_324090397657423_100001693975202_912939_1763159020_n.jpg)
Although I'm willing to bet this was made by a conservative to make people who want Zimmerman to be put to ustice look bad.
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/536339_2575557967440_1809075981_1512314_1130043063_n.jpg)
And on the other side...
(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/535295_324090397657423_100001693975202_912939_1763159020_n.jpg)
Although I'm willing to bet this was made by a conservative to make people who want Zimmerman to be put to ustice look bad.
Here's one from the University of Texas' Daily Texan regarding the Trayvon Martin murder:Looks like the cartoonist for that got fired (http://now.msn.com/now/0329-daily-texan-cartoonist.aspx?ocid=todnow11).
(http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/assets_c/2012/03/utcartoon-thumb-555x312.jpg)
Here's one from the University of Texas' Daily Texan regarding the Trayvon Martin murder:Looks like the cartoonist for that got fired (http://now.msn.com/now/0329-daily-texan-cartoonist.aspx?ocid=todnow11).
(http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/assets_c/2012/03/utcartoon-thumb-555x312.jpg)
(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528458_317798064954711_100001735594773_863408_1577530815_n.jpg)
(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528458_317798064954711_100001735594773_863408_1577530815_n.jpg)
And that doesn't count as child porn why? Just wondering.
(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528458_317798064954711_100001735594773_863408_1577530815_n.jpg)
And that doesn't count as child porn why? Just wondering.
Because the kids are taking a bath, not getting molested.
And who knows our average daily intake? Why whoever figured out how much tap water we all drink on average. Then just multiply that bit by how ever much flouride is in a typical serving of tap water. Duh.
Parents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
Yup, I just saw that. Awesome.Here's one from the University of Texas' Daily Texan regarding the Trayvon Martin murder:Looks like the cartoonist for that got fired (http://now.msn.com/now/0329-daily-texan-cartoonist.aspx?ocid=todnow11).
(http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/assets_c/2012/03/utcartoon-thumb-555x312.jpg)
To be fair I've seen a guy get arrested and plead guilty for loliconParents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
To be fair I've seen a guy get arrested and plead guilty for loliconParents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Parents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Which I have to wonder how you prove that a character in a drawing is underage and doesn't just look young like the porn star gauge. I've also heard them say it's not that the child is naked, the child could be in what could loosely be call a provocative pose(unintentionally). It's the person's intent that matters. How the fuck do you prove what someone was thinking? Thought police?
Parents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Plus, cases of parents being arrested for taking pics of their kids in the bath really aren't as common as the media would have you believe. Almost every parent has at least one picture of their child(ren) bathing -- many of whom are now posting those images on sites like Facebook -- and very few have been arrested or hassled over it. Hell, my baby album has tons of images of me in all my naked glory, including a couple where my crotch is at least partially visible.
Side note: It would be whack if someone came along and charged me with possession of child porn over my own baby pictures.
look up chirs Hadley he improted some lolicon bestiality and got sentensed to prision tmeTo be fair I've seen a guy get arrested and plead guilty for loliconParents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Which I have to wonder how you prove that a character in a drawing is underage and doesn't just look young like the porn star gauge. I've also heard them say it's not that the child is naked, the child could be in what could loosely be call a provocative pose(unintentionally). It's the person's intent that matters. How the fuck do you prove what someone was thinking? Thought police?
To be fair I've seen a guy get arrested and plead guilty for loliconParents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Which I have to wonder how you prove that a character in a drawing is underage and doesn't just look young like the porn star gauge. I've also heard them say it's not that the child is naked, the child could be in what could loosely be call a provocative pose(unintentionally). It's the person's intent that matters. How the fuck do you prove what someone was thinking? Thought police?
To be fair I've seen a guy get arrested and plead guilty for loliconParents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Which I have to wonder how you prove that a character in a drawing is underage and doesn't just look young like the porn star gauge. I've also heard them say it's not that the child is naked, the child could be in what could loosely be call a provocative pose(unintentionally). It's the person's intent that matters. How the fuck do you prove what someone was thinking? Thought police?
Well, some of it has to do with the question of "Is this an established character from a show"? Bart Simpson screwing some girl isn't easy to call anything besides child porn, but outside of that it would depend on the creator of the character, I imagine.
To be fair I've seen a guy get arrested and plead guilty for loliconParents have been charged with manufacturing child porn before when they took pictures of their kids bathing to get developed somewhere and the guy working there saw the pictures.
And that would be wrong.
Which I have to wonder how you prove that a character in a drawing is underage and doesn't just look young like the porn star gauge. I've also heard them say it's not that the child is naked, the child could be in what could loosely be call a provocative pose(unintentionally). It's the person's intent that matters. How the fuck do you prove what someone was thinking? Thought police?
Well, some of it has to do with the question of "Is this an established character from a show"? Bart Simpson screwing some girl isn't easy to call anything besides child porn, but outside of that it would depend on the creator of the character, I imagine.
I've seen a fair amount of porn involving Bart screwing Lisa, and I wasn't even trying to find it.
And as I said, most laws in this area, no matter how good the intent, can be twisted to lock up damn near anyone.
Especially since I think it's a felony just to see CP. Though of coarse the cops(who have the largest collection of CP in the world) are exempt from this. There's no way that's ever been abused. /sarcasm
still this is why I'm paranoid about installing katawa
are they 18
I guarantee they made them all 18. It was a sticking point with them. It's senior year and everyone's magically of age!still this is why I'm paranoid about installing katawa
are they 18
They are all 18, yes.
Least... last I checked. It's more of a game that involves overcoming/accepting disabilities that just happens to have (optional) H scenes in it.
can you give me a link since I know the game is goodI guarantee they made them all 18. It was a sticking point with them. It's senior year and everyone's magically of age!still this is why I'm paranoid about installing katawa
are they 18
They are all 18, yes.
Least... last I checked. It's more of a game that involves overcoming/accepting disabilities that just happens to have (optional) H scenes in it.
Three wars? What? Even if that stuff is true(haven't checked) the president doesn't have anywhere near as much power as these idiots seem to think. Also if something is going downhill fast it will take a while to put on the brakes.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/424809_317529294959983_142868065759441_916655_1068490820_n.jpg)Uh we did not have 1.81 gas in 2009
still this is why I'm paranoid about installing katawa
are they 18
They are all 18, yes.
Least... last I checked. It's more of a game that involves overcoming/accepting disabilities that just happens to have (optional) H scenes in it.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/424809_317529294959983_142868065759441_916655_1068490820_n.jpg)Uh we did not have 1.81 gas in 2009
http://katawa-shoujo.com/download.phpcan you give me a link since I know the game is goodI guarantee they made them all 18. It was a sticking point with them. It's senior year and everyone's magically of age!still this is why I'm paranoid about installing katawa
are they 18
They are all 18, yes.
Least... last I checked. It's more of a game that involves overcoming/accepting disabilities that just happens to have (optional) H scenes in it.
Antecrist, don't you know? Even if the Republicans cockblock Obama, he's still to blame. Because he's got the audacity to be black and in the White House.
Antecrist, don't you know? Even if the Republicans cockblock Obama, he's still to blame. Because he's got the audacity to be black and in the White House.
Well, I'm sure that doesn't help, but Americans tend to be very short sighted and look for a singular cause (the President) to their problems. Its these expectations that result in the office of the Presidency being given so much power (the most important according to Richard Neustadt being the power to persuade and be a middle-man between various agencies, governments, and organizations) and Reagan's famous slogan "are things better now than four years ago." This short sightedness in blaming the President is widespread and even members of this fairly intelligent board (I will only speak in particular for myself) fall into this trap.
(http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/62/2012/03/15/108271_600.jpg)Nothing new but look what I found over here:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/424809_317529294959983_142868065759441_916655_1068490820_n.jpg)
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1krf5Yb0v1rqhebno1_500.jpg)Okay a guy on FB I know had that first pic up. What is the big deal about the bottom right one I mean that does not make the Martin look worse
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1pkm1UPy61rs4zizo1_500.jpg)
Okay a guy on FB I know had that first pic up. What is the big deal about the bottom right one I mean that does not make the Martin look worse
Odd when I see that I see a kid being a kidOkay a guy on FB I know had that first pic up. What is the big deal about the bottom right one I mean that does not make the Martin look worse
It does, in a certain context, because it makes him look like a stupid teenager who cares about looking tough. A clean cut straight-A student comes off a whole lot differently (in public perception, however unfair this is) than a teenager who's trying to be "gangsta". Mind you, the person who found it never considered there was more than Trayvon Martin in the country, so it's of a totally different person, but the intent was there.
Okay a guy on FB I know had that first pic up. What is the big deal about the bottom right one I mean that does not make the Martin look worse
It does, in a certain context, because it makes him look like a stupid teenager who cares about looking tough. A clean cut straight-A student comes off a whole lot differently (in public perception, however unfair this is) than a teenager who's trying to be "gangsta". Mind you, the person who found it never considered there was more than Trayvon Martin in the country, so it's of a totally different person, but the intent was there.
the difference between 17 and 28 on a strength level and just hardiness level is huge, as is 100lbs. Fuck he could have just smothered the kid.
It makes Martin look like gangsta, which means he must obviously be violent and stuff.
It's not even a picture of him.
It makes Martin look like gangsta, which means he must obviously be violent and stuff.
It's not even a picture of him.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/martin.asp
The "gangsta" picture is of a different Trayton Martin.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/552578_392101044148419_355080727850451_1292985_1854786951_n.jpg)Uh Detroit fell due to poor auto sales and a refusal to change for the times and Hiroshima is not that nice I mean it looks nice once you get around the much higher cancer rates
Uh Detroit fell due to poor auto sales and a refusal to change for the times and Hiroshima is not that nice I mean it looks nice once you get around the much higher cancer rates
the difference between 17 and 28 on a strength level and just hardiness level is huge, as is 100lbs. Fuck he could have just smothered the kid.
No as you said completely different context.
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1q1ctBOVr1r9zl7io1_500.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1vi3i0iVC1rs4zizo1_500.png)Was that last one from an occupy protest
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5atn-FwfNQM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423923_367581046605766_286422301388308_1152118_324924173_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423923_367581046605766_286422301388308_1152118_324924173_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/293029_356120661090474_123929004309642_955813_1761224240_n.jpg)Ummm, real liberals are anti-war, people like Obama aren't real liberals and most Democrats for that matter, heck the Democratic party is considered to be a center-right party. So can we stop calling them "liberals", "socialists", "marxists" and whatever else you're calling them this week?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423923_367581046605766_286422301388308_1152118_324924173_n.jpg)I have no problem with guns being allowed in schools, and such, it's just that if such an incident occurs there is sure to be a lot of chaos, and it's most likely that shooter isn't going to be shot back at.
Quote(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423923_367581046605766_286422301388308_1152118_324924173_n.jpg)I have no problem with guns being allowed in schools, and such, it's just that if such an incident occurs there is sure to be a lot of chaos, and it's most likely that shooter isn't going to be shot back at.
The comic has a point, IMO. The shootings would not have gone on as long, and more deaths could have been prevented, if an adult certified with the use of a firearm saw the shooter and fired to defend other people. The fact is that a lot of these school shootings happen in gun-free zones, so clearly simply putting a smiley sign up doesn't do shit to stop a psychopath who wants to murder their classmates. I'm not talking about letting any brat who finds a pistol in the backseat of his parent's car bring it to school, but if a teacher or other adult faculty member is certified and trained in the use of a firearm, there's no reason why he or she shouldn't be allowed to use it to protect other students in the event of a hostile intruder.
people who want teachers to carry guns you have to keep them locked in a safe since the worst thing is some kid getting to them.They could always keep the gun on themselves, but are dumb as a box of rocks if they don't have the safety on.
people who want teachers to carry guns you have to keep them locked in a safe since the worst thing is some kid getting to them.
(http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/bemusedlybespectacled/20511844099/1/tumblr_lvk60ipBzx1qcpvf5)Got it atoms don't exist.
My problem with the gun argument in general is that it's a red herring. The problem isn't necessarily the lack of gun or the over abundance of guns (though they may contribute to the problems.) The problem is deeper and more rooted society and how people are treated (affecting how they react).
Got it atoms don't exist.
(http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/bemusedlybespectacled/20511844099/1/tumblr_lvk60ipBzx1qcpvf5)
(http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/bemusedlybespectacled/20511844099/1/tumblr_lvk60ipBzx1qcpvf5)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/65435_245186255570819_100002383402528_546440_261433409_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/65435_245186255570819_100002383402528_546440_261433409_n.jpg)
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NdBxyJAe4K8/TV7eUbcvNAI/AAAAAAAAGvM/VGozKqBqLJ4/s1600/Big%2BUnion.jpg)
Are you fucking kidding me?! :o
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NdBxyJAe4K8/TV7eUbcvNAI/AAAAAAAAGvM/VGozKqBqLJ4/s1600/Big%2BUnion.jpg)
Are you fucking kidding me?! :o
Distract people with fear? I don't think it's Obama doing that. Why do these people always project like a damn IMAX?
I searched for "worst political cartoons" and found plenty of this thread. I also found this (http://paw.princeton.edu/issues/2008/09/24/pages/2147/Cartoons_lg.jpg) (linked for size), which might be a classic of the genre, but I'll be damned if I can make sense of it.
Personally I quite like the 'shopping of that British cartoon. Obama would look boss in a redcoat.
I once saw a cartoon with Bart getting a blow job from Maggie, with Marge freaking out off to the side. I remember the dialogue, and my own reaction:
Marge: BART?!
Bart: Don't worry, Mom. Maggie lost her pacifier. (grin)
Me: O.o W...TF?
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NdBxyJAe4K8/TV7eUbcvNAI/AAAAAAAAGvM/VGozKqBqLJ4/s1600/Big%2BUnion.jpg)
Are you fucking kidding me?! :o
Personally I quite like the 'shopping of that British cartoon. Obama would look boss in a redcoat.
I will also be donning a monocle, even though my eyesight is not significantly impaired in any way.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/564454_416958401654108_298416226841660_1807468_714572900_n.jpg)What does abortion have to do with anything with the last one
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/555923_396784860332680_100000035071755_1543341_1672335216_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/564889_382781165076260_112415152112864_1307699_1602811279_n.jpg)
It ties in with the folks that try to paint abortion as part of a big racist conspiracy to get black folks and other minorities to abort all their babies and drive them to extinction.(http://memedepot.com/uploads/1000/1148_1253230725640.jpg)
It ties in with the folks that try to paint abortion as part of a big racist conspiracy to get black folks and other minorities to abort all their babies and drive them to extinction.
I once saw a cartoon with Bart getting a blow job from Maggie, with Marge freaking out off to the side. I remember the dialogue, and my own reaction:
Marge: BART?!
Bart: Don't worry, Mom. Maggie lost her pacifier. (grin)
Me: O.o W...TF?
I have seen that one too...I don't remember what my reaction was.
Holy shit, it exists? Mom's told me about it for YEARS but I haven't been able to find it anywhereOh god. Just...oh god.I once saw a cartoon with Bart getting a blow job from Maggie, with Marge freaking out off to the side. I remember the dialogue, and my own reaction:
Marge: BART?!
Bart: Don't worry, Mom. Maggie lost her pacifier. (grin)
Me: O.o W...TF?
I have seen that one too...I don't remember what my reaction was.
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg836/scaled.php?server=836&filename=dd395snapsite.jpg&res=landing)This makes no sense, even by Dees Illustrations standards.
I once saw a cartoon with Bart getting a blow job from Maggie, with Marge freaking out off to the side. I remember the dialogue, and my own reaction:
Marge: BART?!
Bart: Don't worry, Mom. Maggie lost her pacifier. (grin)
Me: O.o W...TF?
I have seen that one too...I don't remember what my reaction was.
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg836/scaled.php?server=836&filename=dd395snapsite.jpg&res=landing)This makes no sense, even by Dees Illustrations standards.
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg836/scaled.php?server=836&filename=dd395snapsite.jpg&res=landing)This makes no sense, even by Dees Illustrations standards.
Agreed.
What the hell point is this trying to make? That soldiers are forced fed drugs? I don't know, I'm confused.
I once saw a cartoon with Bart getting a blow job from Maggie, with Marge freaking out off to the side. I remember the dialogue, and my own reaction:
Marge: BART?!
Bart: Don't worry, Mom. Maggie lost her pacifier. (grin)
Me: O.o W...TF?
I have seen that one too...I don't remember what my reaction was.
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg836/scaled.php?server=836&filename=dd395snapsite.jpg&res=landing)This makes no sense, even by Dees Illustrations standards.
Agreed.
What the hell point is this trying to make? That soldiers are forced fed drugs? I don't know, I'm confused.
I guess it has something to do with Big Pharma funding and supporting foreign wars and such. If that makes any sense.
Or maybe the FDA is creating a race of super soldiers who have pills for heads.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/521586_2855976999309_1256111983_32057122_834452904_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/578371_3309714555102_1635256314_2627012_1241739289_n.jpg)Yeah the party structures were majorly different the republicans lost black voters in the /Nixon years when he played to racism.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/521576_102606373205206_100003675306307_10631_654135976_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/521586_2855976999309_1256111983_32057122_834452904_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/578371_3309714555102_1635256314_2627012_1241739289_n.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/521576_102606373205206_100003675306307_10631_654135976_n.jpg)
However, the modern party taking credit for them is kind of like a person taking credit for the actions of an ancestor.
...Japan and the United States require vastly different infrastructure. Like, we require a lot of it to move shit around. I don't exactly what that cartoon is (probably erroneously) referring to, but I imagine that if the U.S. had something like the Japanese "bullet trains", they'd be profitable. For instance, if there was top of the line high speed rail linking Detroit and Chicago, you go could from the Motor City to the Windy City in just about the amount of time it takes to drive from Detroit to the state capitol. There has to be a market for that, assuming it's even moderately affordable.
Britain's efficient health insurance program did not force international conservatism to institute wasteful, hugely costly austerity.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2fqavEbsB1qkinreo1_500.gif)
*facepalm* Is the innuendo there intentional? If so, why?
...
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_bdI9HhtECQ/T3d6aEoQTTI/AAAAAAAAACk/Hz5xIT2a-lk/s1600/umb083110.jpg)
"2010"
I thought Umbert the Unborn was supposed to a parody or something.
I also like the "Buffett Rule only raises $47 billion." Oh, its only 47 billion dollars...that's asswipe money. Perspectiveless fucks.
(http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/301721_131086387022588_100003636814224_131731_741605796_n.jpg)
Kinda curious as to what actually killed those animals. Was it wanton cruelty, as the author seems to imply, or something a bit more “Circle of Life”-ish?
*snip*
MOTHER-GOD-DAMN-PISS-DICK-SHITTING-CUNT-ASS-FUCKING mirrors, how do they work!
*snip*
MOTHER-GOD-DAMN-PISS-DICK-SHITTING-CUNT-ASS-FUCKING mirrors, how do they work!
(http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lu6w1ju6oo1qzeucjo1_500.jpg)
Trigger warning for rape:
also NSFW, kinda. (http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2lnuhD4sD1r000zro1_500.jpg)
Yes, it's a rage comic but it's a comic in support of a real event. "Fuck-A-Friend Zone: The 2012 movement."
O_oTrigger warning for rape:
also NSFW, kinda. (http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2lnuhD4sD1r000zro1_500.jpg)
Yes, it's a rage comic but it's a comic in support of a real event. "Fuck-A-Friend Zone: The 2012 movement."
What. The. Fuck.
O_oTrigger warning for rape:
also NSFW, kinda. (http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2lnuhD4sD1r000zro1_500.jpg)
Yes, it's a rage comic but it's a comic in support of a real event. "Fuck-A-Friend Zone: The 2012 movement."
What. The. Fuck.
Dude.
Pretty sure it is a troll as the only thing I can find on it are people's tumblr's raging about it.
So I call Troll.
Still not funny.
(http://www.conservativeimage.com/obama%20vader%20tarkin.JPG)Reminds me of how my mother wanted to prove the NWO shit to me with a Merkel soundbite "we want to change the world".
Hey conservatives, that's one shiny mirror, don't burn down the house...
O_oTrigger warning for rape:
also NSFW, kinda. (http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2lnuhD4sD1r000zro1_500.jpg)
Yes, it's a rage comic but it's a comic in support of a real event. "Fuck-A-Friend Zone: The 2012 movement."
What. The. Fuck.
Dude.
Trigger warning for rape:
also NSFW, kinda. (http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2lnuhD4sD1r000zro1_500.jpg)
Yes, it's a rage comic but it's a comic in support of a real event. "Fuck-A-Friend Zone: The 2012 movement."
Great... now I've got the Darth Vader/Imperial March song stuck in my head...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekzslGuSQC8
Great... now I've got the Darth Vader/Imperial March song stuck in my head...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekzslGuSQC8
Just for you SpaceProg
(http://www.conservativeimage.com/obama%20vader%20tarkin.JPG)
Hey conservatives, that's one shiny mirror, don't burn down the house...
Trigger warning for rape:
also NSFW, kinda. (http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2lnuhD4sD1r000zro1_500.jpg)
Yes, it's a rage comic but it's a comic in support of a real event. "Fuck-A-Friend Zone: The 2012 movement."
"friendzone"
This.Quote"friendzone"
for all men pissed about being in the friendzone.
ive been seeing tons of whining all over the internet.
men get friendzoned because they're behaving like a friend, not a potential b/f. if you can't tell the difference, you might not be mature enough to handle a relationship.
i dont know, ive been single for a few years now, ive been friendzoned alot, no one to blame but myself.
What is this I don't even...why are the nazis left of fascists
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
My first thought was why are the anarchists on the exact opposite side of Ron Paul when his message is consistently that of minarchism?Anarchists exist outside of the spectrum
Though, it makes me smile to see how little these Paul types truly understand about politics, and frown because they vote.
Because the creator of this nice graphic has little to no understanding of political theory or history.What is this I don't even...why are the nazis left of fascists
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
What is this I don't even...
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
What is this I don't even...why are the nazis left of fascists
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
What is this I don't even...
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
Fascism is far right wing >_>
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
When it comes to economics they were progressive (unions, universal health care, welfare)...
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)[/quote]
As someone who studies politics I want to slap this person.
Fascism is far right wing >_>
Only in social issues. When it comes to economics they were progressive (unions, universal health care, welfare)... for the people they viewed as superior.
This is why the political compass is bogus. Social and economic issues are not exclusive.
Free-market capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than any other system in the history of man. The problem with our country today is we no longer have free-market capitalism.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
This was posted on Facebook by an old friend of mine, who's become a fundie Paulbot since we last met.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524854_381631688538183_264888726879147_1197435_716337552_n.jpg)
Free-market capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than any other system in the history of man. The problem with our country today is we no longer have free-market capitalism.
What is this I don't even...
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg (https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
A free market is flawed. Either you can deal with those flaws or you can dogmatically pretend they don't exist, costing trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.This.
What is this I don't even...
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg (https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
Anarchy = Slavery
LOLWUT
What is this I don't even...
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg (https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
Anarchy = Slavery
LOLWUT
Also War is Peace, and Ignorance is Strength.
Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken.
The Force shall free me.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ry9whbtQ1qb85cqo1_500.jpg)
That could apply to any career really. Biology or history teacher comes to mind.(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ry9whbtQ1qb85cqo1_500.jpg)
Conservative logic:
> wants profession as pharmacist
> learns that some aspects of being a pharmacist goes against personal beliefs
> becomes pharmacist anyway
> gets bitchy when they're told to do their job
Conservative logic: Preventing me from breaching others' liberty is a breach of my liberty.Conservative logic:That could apply to any career really. Biology or history teacher comes to mind.
> wants profession as pharmacist
> learns that some aspects of being a pharmacist goes against personal beliefs
> becomes pharmacist anyway
> gets bitchy when they're told to do their job
This. Creationist argues forcing teachers to teach biological evolution against their beliefs. It really is the same thing. They're asking for religious special rights.That could apply to any career really. Biology or history teacher comes to mind.(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ry9whbtQ1qb85cqo1_500.jpg)
Conservative logic:
> wants profession as pharmacist
> learns that some aspects of being a pharmacist goes against personal beliefs
> becomes pharmacist anyway
> gets bitchy when they're told to do their job
Personally, I joined the army and then objected to being forced to kill people because it went against my pacifist beliefs.Is this a joke? I don't mean to be rude, but a military career doesn't seem like something a pacifist would generally consider.
Personally, I joined the army and then objected to being forced to kill people because it went against my pacifist beliefs.Is this a joke? I don't mean to be rude, but a military career doesn't seem like something a pacifist would generally consider.
According to certain military officials, when the war in Iraq started, some soldiers started claiming continence objector status. Sorry, boys, this is a volunteer army.Personally, I joined the army and then objected to being forced to kill people because it went against my pacifist beliefs.Is this a joke? I don't mean to be rude, but a military career doesn't seem like something a pacifist would generally consider.
I am confused.
Oh... right... I knew that... >_>Personally, I joined the army and then objected to being forced to kill people because it went against my pacifist beliefs.Is this a joke? I don't mean to be rude, but a military career doesn't seem like something a pacifist would generally consider.
Bit like a pro-life pharmacist in that respect, isn't it?
Not really a political cartoons:As yes native american bigotry. Less talked about despite the fact that it's all around us (Washington Redskins Atlanta Braves)
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2xtolBQ3V1ru2avxo1_500.jpg)
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2xymaFWel1ru2avxo1_500.jpg)
Crazy-long comic ahoy:
<snip>
"Frug's second postmodern principle is that sex is not something natural, nor is it something completely determinate and definable. Rather, sex is part of a system of meaning, produced by language."
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m24iuxRAOv1qj7gpko1_500.png)If that person is not a cop then it's not freedom of speach
Not really a political cartoons:
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2xtolBQ3V1ru2avxo1_500.jpg)
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2xymaFWel1ru2avxo1_500.jpg)
Crazy-long comic ahoy:
http://www.plasticbrickautomaton.com/comics/101.jpg (http://www.plasticbrickautomaton.com/comics/101.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m24iuxRAOv1qj7gpko1_500.png)
Crazy-long comic ahoy:
http://www.plasticbrickautomaton.com/comics/101.jpg (http://www.plasticbrickautomaton.com/comics/101.jpg)
You might treat this like an exaggerated strawman, but this is almost a spot-on description of certain less savory parts of the social justice movement. *cough*tumblr*cough*
I have seen plenty of people make those exact arguments with a straight face.
Crazy-long comic ahoy:
http://www.plasticbrickautomaton.com/comics/101.jpg (http://www.plasticbrickautomaton.com/comics/101.jpg)
You might treat this like an exaggerated strawman, but this is almost a spot-on description of certain less savory parts of the social justice movement. *cough*tumblr*cough*
I have seen plenty of people make those exact arguments with a straight face.
Every single one? Anyways, the comic was posted on the Mensright subreddit. So... There were a couple of others buuuuuut. They were too graphic. That was the tamest one I foun.
They're saying that Natives who protests appropriation of their culture are just "jealous". They're also denigrating their social condition (which is ironic since the ancestors of the poster makers are probably responsible for that.)
Let's just say there's a reason I'm considering merging the best and worst political cartoons threads again.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/574748_350726094984633_160534294003815_980761_2084598881_n.jpg)
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8lnyQfA1rufiu4o1_500.jpg)
Follow some choice blogs on tumblr I take it? :P
But yeah... I saw it and knew I had to post it. Also what is with Obama's head?
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8lnyQfA1rufiu4o1_500.jpg)
I also follow STFU conservatives. What is up with the racism in this oneFollow some choice blogs on tumblr I take it? :P
Yeah...But yeah... I saw it and knew I had to post it. Also what is with Obama's head?
It kind of reminds me of the stereotypical bong. I'd have thought it was essentially saying "Are you fucking high?" re: Obama's policies, if this guy had any sense of subtlety. But nope, probably just another bad artist at work.
Follow some choice blogs on tumblr I take it? :P
Yeah...But yeah... I saw it and knew I had to post it. Also what is with Obama's head?
It kind of reminds me of the stereotypical bong. I'd have thought it was essentially saying "Are you fucking high?" re: Obama's policies, if this guy had any sense of subtlety. But nope, probably just another bad artist at work.
I also follow STFU conservatives. What is up with the racism in this oneFollow some choice blogs on tumblr I take it? :P
Yeah...But yeah... I saw it and knew I had to post it. Also what is with Obama's head?
It kind of reminds me of the stereotypical bong. I'd have thought it was essentially saying "Are you fucking high?" re: Obama's policies, if this guy had any sense of subtlety. But nope, probably just another bad artist at work.
Z0mg guize! Romney is a communist!
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/224371-romney-campaign-claims-auto-bailout-was-his-idea
Huh. Should've called that one in February (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/14/crony-capitalist-auto-bailout-mitt-romney).
Actually, when you look at Romney's campaign, you find:
1. you can determine Romney's policy on an issue at a given moment, or how the policy is changing, but not both at the same time.
2. the probability of Romney having a position is never quite 100%, but never 0% either.
3. when Obama adopts a certain policy position, Romney, without having to communicate or interact, will adopt the exact opposite policy position.
4. sometimes a pair of Romney policies appear, cancel each other out, and disappear again.
5. it is impossible to accurately reason whether Romney is for or against a given issue until you have observed his statements on the matter; until then, you must assume that he is both for and against the issue.
It's not communism. It's not even capitalism. It might not be something that classic political science understands.
5. it is impossible to accurately reason whether Romney is for or against a given issue until you have observed his statements on the matter; until then, you must assume that he is both for and against the issue.
5. it is impossible to accurately reason whether Romney is for or against a given issue until you have observed his statements on the matter; until then, you must assume that he is both for and against the issue.
You mean Romney is Schrödingers politician?
It's not communism. It's not even capitalism. It might not be something that classic political science understands.I think it's called opportunism.
Why the hell is she smiling?!
Why the hell is she smiling?!Good question. I mean, if you want to have you're rapist's baby go ahead, but I don't think most women would choose that option.
I just find any smiling with such a horrid thing wrong on many levels also want to bet that woman was a random pic gotten off of googleWhy the hell is she smiling?!Good question. I mean, if you want to have you're rapist's baby go ahead, but I don't think most women would choose that option.
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8g53D9A1r995weo1_500.jpg)
Fun fact I saw these two stupid stupid white girls who got kicked out of school for a video saying they dont hate blacks just niggers. They also criticized black people for not talking right while they had awful grammar.(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8g53D9A1r995weo1_500.jpg)
My friend has actually said, "I don't hate black people, just niggers." I sort of understand it, but I think at the very least change "nigger" to "stereotypical gangsta." That's not to say I agree with it at all.
http://imgur.com/gallery/EPlPWLupe Fiasco would like to have a word
The "niggers" versus "black people" thing might be attributed to Boondocks and its approach to the usage of the word.Maybe not that specifically but the idea of "good" black people has been around forever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhgwy9y5ttA
Not sure how I feel about it, but I grew up in a relatively safe white neighborhood and don't have to regularly deal with racist bullshit.
The "niggers" versus "black people" thing might be attributed to Boondocks and its approach to the usage of the word.
From Facebook where idiot ideas go to breed...The abortion rate is I think lower then that but I cant get a statistic
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s320x320/538493_259681094129319_114588931971870_495278_811044001_n.jpg)
Got this from a friend (who is not my friend because of politics. Soon it may be he's my friend in spite of his politics).
http://imgur.com/gallery/EPlPWLupe Fiasco would like to have a word
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8g53D9A1r995weo1_500.jpg)
The only good thing about that image at all is that Lando is being compared favorably to Lil' Wayne.
The idea that a certain lifestyle or style of dress makes you a bad person....NO. Just no.
The only good thing about that image at all is that Lando is being compared favorably to Lil' Wayne.
The idea that a certain lifestyle or style of dress makes you a bad person....NO. Just no.
Is...is Lando a nickname I don't know about for Neil DeGrasse-Tyson? Or did you just mistake the modern Carl Sagan for Billy Dee Williams?
Also:
(http://i.imgur.com/KKju9.jpg)
(http://exposethemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/welfare.jpg)
(http://exposethemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/welfare.jpg)
Grow up and pay your taxes, you whiny fucking babies.
And these people don't seem to realize that there are cutoff dates and strings attached with welfare ever since 1996, but they still seem to bitch and believe welfare myths...(http://exposethemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/welfare.jpg)
Grow up and pay your taxes, you whiny fucking babies.
And these people don't seem to realize that there are cutoff dates and strings attached with welfare ever since 1996, but they still seem to bitch and believe welfare myths...(http://exposethemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/welfare.jpg)
Grow up and pay your taxes, you whiny fucking babies.
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8g53D9A1r995weo1_500.jpg)
The only good thing about that image at all is that Lando is being compared favorably to Lil' Wayne.
The idea that a certain lifestyle or style of dress makes you a bad person....NO. Just no.
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3iunba8jg1qbdloto1_500.jpg)In all honesty, yes, in some cases due to not understanding someone else's life experiences, you could be wrong about a specific perception.
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8g53D9A1r995weo1_500.jpg)
The only good thing about that image at all is that Lando is being compared favorably to Lil' Wayne.
The idea that a certain lifestyle or style of dress makes you a bad person....NO. Just no.
Putting aside the Lando reference... doesn't Lil Wayne make MORE money then De GRasse tyson? So according to the Free MArket, the guy on the right is more successful.
(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3iunba8jg1qbdloto1_500.jpg)
(http://antzinpantz.com/kns/images/jan09/obamanomics.jpg)
(http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3b8g53D9A1r995weo1_500.jpg)
The only good thing about that image at all is that Lando is being compared favorably to Lil' Wayne.
The idea that a certain lifestyle or style of dress makes you a bad person....NO. Just no.
Putting aside the Lando reference... doesn't Lil Wayne make MORE money then De GRasse tyson? So according to the Free MArket, the guy on the right is more successful.
Well, that's assuming the maker of this picture is a free market capitalist.
The trouble with Thatcherism is that other people eventually run out of money for you to steal.
Well, that's assuming the maker of this picture is a free market capitalist.
But how often does that assumption pan out?
I agree - that is some sweet brickwork. On the other hand, in the last cartoon Ed looks rather like Gordon.
Oh PETA, you're hilarious.To answer, Wykked, yes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCs8bgPi3aQ
Didn't they once protest the game Cooking Mama because the player prepares meat products in it?
And then the makers of the game replied. In character. It was beautiful.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3vhsp2pqS1ruvmcfo1_500.png)Uh Clinton's women concented
Sandra Fluke.
She had spoken out about the cost of 'contraceptives' - by which she meant pharmaceutical birth control - for college students, who pay out the same amount whether they have sex a hundred times a month or once, or use the medication to control hormonal dysfunctions and other medical problems. And on behalf of another student who had wound up losing her ovaries (one or both, not sure) to cysts because she couldn't afford the medication to treat it, as it was considered 'birth control' and not covered by the college's health coverage.
So Rush Airbag grabbed the quote about 'contraceptives' costing up to $500 a month and twisted it into an explicit accusation that Sandra personally uses $500 worth of CONDOMS a month and wants the US taxpayers to pay her to have sex all day, making her a busy hooker.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m30kf5JSqY1qmeq9jo1_500.jpg)
I think that is supposed to be a cross dresser which makes this pic inaccurate seeing how few states have T protections(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m30kf5JSqY1qmeq9jo1_500.jpg)
I'm still trying to figure out what sexual fetishes are being referred to here. A glasses fetish? A beads fetish?
Seriously, every single article of clothing that person is wearing is perfectly normal in every way.
Sandra Fluke.
She had spoken out about the cost of 'contraceptives' - by which she meant pharmaceutical birth control - for college students, who pay out the same amount whether they have sex a hundred times a month or once, or use the medication to control hormonal dysfunctions and other medical problems. And on behalf of another student who had wound up losing her ovaries (one or both, not sure) to cysts because she couldn't afford the medication to treat it, as it was considered 'birth control' and not covered by the college's health coverage.
So Rush Airbag grabbed the quote about 'contraceptives' costing up to $500 a month and twisted it into an explicit accusation that Sandra personally uses $500 worth of CONDOMS a month and wants the US taxpayers to pay her to have sex all day, making her a busy hooker.
I don't remember him ever mentioning condoms. I think he is just ignorant of how birth control works (that it's a pill you take all the time). He also completely ignored the fact that birth control pills is often used for reasons other than birth control. There are people who are abstinent and take birth control pills.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m48j4ggKft1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg842/scaled.php?server=842&filename=dd395gridsite.jpg&res=landing)
I think it's supposed to be Illuminadi(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg842/scaled.php?server=842&filename=dd395gridsite.jpg&res=landing)
...I don't get it.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m48j4ggKft1r63hf8o1_500.jpg)
It would make a heck of a Prog rock concept album cover. The songs will be about spaceships, hobbits, butterfly sneezes, and all kinds of other weird stuff.
If you're wondering what the album cover has to do with that, you just don't know Prog.
;)
It would make a heck of a Prog rock concept album cover. The songs will be about spaceships, hobbits, butterfly sneezes, and all kinds of other weird stuff.
If you're wondering what the album cover has to do with that, you just don't know Prog.
;)
I feel an urge to listen to the Alan Parsons Project now.
It would make a heck of a Prog rock concept album cover. The songs will be about spaceships, hobbits, butterfly sneezes, and all kinds of other weird stuff.
If you're wondering what the album cover has to do with that, you just don't know Prog.
;)
I feel an urge to listen to the Alan Parsons Project now.
It would make a heck of a Prog rock concept album cover. The songs will be about spaceships, hobbits, butterfly sneezes, and all kinds of other weird stuff.
If you're wondering what the album cover has to do with that, you just don't know Prog.
;)
I feel an urge to listen to the Alan Parsons Project now.
Closest to Alan Parsons I got is the Ladyhawke soundtrack, by Andrew Powell.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bugi35v1CKk
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4l9thA3TQ1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
I couldn't figure out where else to put this...
Laughing makes me a bad person, right?(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4l9thA3TQ1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
I couldn't figure out where else to put this...
...I...I...
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THE ASSHOLE WHO MADE THIS?!
Yeah, probably.Laughing makes me a bad person, right?(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4l9thA3TQ1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
I couldn't figure out where else to put this...
...I...I...
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THE ASSHOLE WHO MADE THIS?!
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4l9thA3TQ1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
I couldn't figure out where else to put this...
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4l9thA3TQ1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
I couldn't figure out where else to put this...
To the last anti-abortion thing: Apparently the dumbass doesn't realize just HOW MANY KIDS are in the hell that is the foster system in this country.[-inserts long ass rant about the foster system that people have seen me say a million times-]
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/bieber350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/murderer350.jpg)
Hey, remember all those people the Devil murdered in the bible?I think I saw his body count was about 100 times lower then Gods
Yeah, me neither.
The only folks Satan offed in the bible were Job's family. Grand total? 10 or so.
http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-has-killed-more-satan-or-god.html
(http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/DWB/no_estimates.jpg)
It gets worse when you go into the killings the Bibble doesn't give numbers for.
Don't the majority of the killings lack numbers? Like all the cities destroyed, with the fetuses ripped from the belly of their mothers and the heads of children dashed on the rocks?Yup. The most important of these is probably the Flood, which killed, you know, everyone.
Quite the authority on the subject, that Bieber.
http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/umbhunka350.jpg
(https://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/579670_460989417261108_100000501600125_1704945_498830097_n.jpg)Wait... if your religion is an unchangeable state of being, then why do Christians spend so much effort trying to convert people? And does she realize that interfaith marriages were illegal up until the last century?
(https://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/579670_460989417261108_100000501600125_1704945_498830097_n.jpg)Wait... if your religion is an unchangeable state of being, then why do Christians spend so much effort trying to convert people? And does she realize that interfaith marriages were illegal up until the last century?
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/fingernails350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/fingernails350.jpg)
Holy balls, that is the creepiest-looking fetus EVER. If I weren't already pro-choice, that picture would make me pro-choice all by itself. Hel, I'm surprised that picture doesn't make me want to go up to pregnant women yelling, "KILL IT! KILL IT NOW BEFORE IT DEVOURS YOUR SOUL!!"
Also, nail files! In the uterus! Now I'm picturing a botched abortion with a nail file, and the fetus using it because it's just THAT badass. And evil.
Wait... if your religion is an unchangeable state of being, then why do Christians spend so much effort trying to convert people?
I'm living proof that religion is not an immutable characteristic.
I was a Christian. Now I'm not :D
I'm living proof that religion is not an immutable characteristic.
I was a Christian. Now I'm not :D
Ah, but you weren't a true Christian.(click to show/hide)
...when you are not thinking about sex...??? That doesn't really happen, does it?.
IIRC PP does do mammograms.
Another DOMA one.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/552772_464309566929093_100000501600125_1716311_1370878887_n.jpg)
Isn't oral sex considered sodomy?Not by any definition I've heard.
Isn't oral sex considered sodomy?Not by any definition I've heard.
Isn't oral sex considered sodomy?Not by any definition I've heard.
Definition of SODOMY
: anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex; also : copulation with an animal
Sodomy (/ˈsɒdəmi/) refers to anal sex or other non-penile/vaginal copulation-like acts, especially between male persons or between a person and an animal.[
Sodomy laws generally criminalize oral or anal sex, between consenting adults even in the privacy of their homes
Ouch, sorry if I pressed the wrong button :(
I was just going for some overly pious spiel a fundy would give you. I didn't mean to offend :'(
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4sntewrA81qmkgj6o1_400.jpg)
Why the light bulbs?
(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/garbageday/2009/Comedy_Goldmine/Sub_Actuality_04.gif)
The new low-energy light bulbs are part of a Conspiracy; also, they're full of toxic mercury.
IIRC PP does do mammograms.
Another DOMA one.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/552772_464309566929093_100000501600125_1716311_1370878887_n.jpg)
The new low-energy light bulbs are part of a Conspiracy; also, they're full of toxic mercury.
The new low-energy light bulbs are part of a Conspiracy; also, they're full of toxic mercury.
Mandatory fluorescent lightbulbs are part of the Global Warming hoax plot, put together by Al Gore and Big Pharma. Because fluorescent lightbulbs actually flicker on and off super fast, they will give everyone epilepsy, and Big Pharma will make money by selling epilepsy medication to those people. Of course, Big Pharma meds also have the side effect of making everyone hypnotized and stupid, so that it is easier for the mainstream media to indoctrinate them so that nobody will have any will to speak out against the fluoride in the water and the Bilderbergers' plan to perform eugenics and exterminate 90% of the world population, all for obeying their homosexual rich white man cult of the Bohemian Grove, which is a subset of the Illuminati.
IIRC PP does do mammograms.
Another DOMA one.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/552772_464309566929093_100000501600125_1716311_1370878887_n.jpg)
They forgot a few.
Why doesn't all PIV sex take place within a marriage?
Because this sign is bullshit.
Okay, how about children? Clearly illegitimate children are never born!
Sorry. Bullshit.
Well...surely marriage has been the same for 5,000 years?
Nope. 5,000 years ago it was commonplace for a man to marry as many wives as possible. They were considered his property, not actual people.
700 years ago, women couldn't own property until their husbands died.
150 years ago, black people were kept as property and couldn't get married at all.
50 years ago, white and black people could get married, but not to each other.
All of those things have changed.
(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/garbageday/2009/Comedy_Goldmine/Sub_Actuality_04.gif)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/trees350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/fingernails350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/umbhunka350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/murderer350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/nobamacare350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/cold350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/killingbabiese350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/hatecrime350.jpg)
(http://www.christianshirts.net/images/designs/large/bieber350.jpg)
(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/garbageday/2009/Comedy_Goldmine/Sub_Actuality_04.gif)
OH NOES! KIDS WITH GUITARS ARE EVIL!
(yeah, I know it's probably an Occupy Protester, but still....)
Kind of unrelated, but why did everyone suddenly stop caring about the Occupy movement? It seemed to be doing something. I haven't heard anything about it in quite a while.
Kind of unrelated, but why did everyone suddenly stop caring about the Occupy movement? It seemed to be doing something. I haven't heard anything about it in quite a while.
The media realized that we are a trivial society and stopped reporting on it. Then they started reporting on other stupid things and society just forgot...
(http://i48.tinypic.com/2ujs1fp.jpg)
The new low-energy light bulbs are part of a Conspiracy; also, they're full of toxic mercury.
I've seen people unironically bitch about losing the freedom to use what type of lightbulb they want.
More insanity from "Counter Think":
(http://i50.tinypic.com/z1f9x.jpg)
I'm not even sure what the hell is going on in this one:
(http://i49.tinypic.com/ifdeh3.jpg)
Please tell me this is someone's idea of a joke. A twisted, sarcastic joke.
(http://scumorama.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/owspic-e1318784466350.png)
If I remember correctly, there was some study about the wifi on laptops affecting sperm if you have the laptops on your laps.I'm not even sure what the hell is going on in this one:
(http://i49.tinypic.com/ifdeh3.jpg)
...what?
I'm not even sure what the hell is going on in this one:
(http://i49.tinypic.com/ifdeh3.jpg)
...what?
(http://i47.tinypic.com/29kp0ty.jpg)
Quote(http://i47.tinypic.com/29kp0ty.jpg)
This one here actually would be kinda funny in a dark humor way if the pills he was putting in the gun were Prozac. Ironically, they're shaped like bullets. Odd design for an anti-depressant.
I'm not even sure what the hell is going on in this one:
(http://i49.tinypic.com/ifdeh3.jpg)
...what?
Kind of unrelated, but why did everyone suddenly stop caring about the Occupy movement? It seemed to be doing something. I haven't heard anything about it in quite a while.
The media realized that we are a trivial society and stopped reporting on it. Then they started reporting on other stupid things and society just forgot...
Bullets normally aren't pointed on either end, tho...Quote(http://i47.tinypic.com/29kp0ty.jpg)
This one here actually would be kinda funny in a dark humor way if the pills he was putting in the gun were Prozac. Ironically, they're shaped like bullets. Odd design for an anti-depressant.
The first one actually had me literally laughing it's so out there and ridiculous.
XD
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
XD
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
Is it bad that I cannot genuinely tell if that is mocking people who oppose that kinda stuff, or if it actually does oppose that kinda stuff?
XD
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
My prozac are shaped like bullets though... Dangit, what a time for my digital camera to be broken. I'ma do an image search...
EDIT:
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-OabCtcUy5HQ/T1Vr_C_NRmI/AAAAAAAAAXM/BVdeEstPE0U/s1600/Prozac_Main.jpg)
They're not quite as obviously bullet-y as I thought, but I can still see the resemblance :p.
XD
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
Well, nice to see what this cartoonist thinks about the majority of Catholic churches.
Strange thing is with Gibson service is performed in Latin and rejects Vatican 2 which explains the anti semitismXD
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
Well, nice to see what this cartoonist thinks about the majority of Catholic churches.
This cartoonist seems to be from one of those far-right, ultraconservative, SSPX/Bro. Michael Dimond/Mel Gibson-type splinter churches that hate everybody.
I thought the hippie was Jesus at first.
One of my best friends is a youth pastor who also plays guitar. That 'comic' hurts my brain, as a result.Catholic or protestant. Although most even catholic services try to liven up the music a bit.
You can't invite the wolves in, make them feel at home, wink at their same-sex affliction, and then be shocked that they actually want to be treated no differently than straight people. Of course they're going to damn-near riot and threaten violence when they're "denied" the right to marry. Of course they're going to flip their pink-glitter covered lids when someone points out they're not "normal". Of course they're going to toss their Birkenstocks when someone says that "two mommies" might as well be "two wildebeests" raising a child.
One of my best friends is a youth pastor who also plays guitar. That 'comic' hurts my brain, as a result.Catholic or protestant. Although most even catholic services try to liven up the music a bit.
One of my best friends is a youth pastor who also plays guitar. That 'comic' hurts my brain, as a result.Catholic or protestant. Although most even catholic services try to liven up the music a bit.
Most of the time sports are just, well, sports. Other times, as with Tim Tebow, it's a barometer of the culture. Ask a person how they feel about Tim Tebow and it will tell you alot about where they stand on many other issues. Those who like Tebow probably are sympathetic to the Christian faith, even if they're not necessarily church-goers. Additionally, they would probably agree that Hollywood is a cesspool and embrace traditional American values. Those who hate Tebow are more likely to resent traditional American values and probably embrace the creeping socialism of the Obama administration.
Let's have a quick snapshot:
Like Tebow? Abortion stops a beating heart.
Hate Tebow? Pro-choice all the way, baby!
Like Tebow? Wouldn't watch Bravo TV on a bet.
Hate Tebow? Think same-sex relations are ok!
Like Tebow? Proudly fly that American Flag!
Hate Tebow? Burning the flag is awesome!
Like Tebow? Sundays usually involve Church.
Hate Tebow? Sundays are for reading the NY Times.
Like Tebow? Obama is a communist.
Hate Tebow? Obama is wonderful!
Like Tebow? Fox News is where it's at.
Hate Tebow? MSNBC is your cup of de-caf coffee!
Like Tebow? Like the Catholic Cartoon Blog.
Hate Tebow? "Someone should shut down the Catholic Cartoon Blog!"
The list goes on and on...
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-fREWJPG79yE/TwwzzMdkrNI/AAAAAAAABNo/hxMuMQAyh28/s400/Tebow.jpg)This catholic cartoonist is a bigger dumbass then I thought as Tebow's daddy hates Catholics(tried to get Filipinos to see the grace of god)QuoteMost of the time sports are just, well, sports. Other times, as with Tim Tebow, it's a barometer of the culture. Ask a person how they feel about Tim Tebow and it will tell you alot about where they stand on many other issues. Those who like Tebow probably are sympathetic to the Christian faith, even if they're not necessarily church-goers. Additionally, they would probably agree that Hollywood is a cesspool and embrace traditional American values. Those who hate Tebow are more likely to resent traditional American values and probably embrace the creeping socialism of the Obama administration.
Let's have a quick snapshot:
Like Tebow? Abortion stops a beating heart.
Hate Tebow? Pro-choice all the way, baby!
Like Tebow? Wouldn't watch Bravo TV on a bet.
Hate Tebow? Think same-sex relations are ok!
Like Tebow? Proudly fly that American Flag!
Hate Tebow? Burning the flag is awesome!
Like Tebow? Sundays usually involve Church.
Hate Tebow? Sundays are for reading the NY Times.
Like Tebow? Obama is a communist.
Hate Tebow? Obama is wonderful!
Like Tebow? Fox News is where it's at.
Hate Tebow? MSNBC is your cup of de-caf coffee!
Like Tebow? Like the Catholic Cartoon Blog.
Hate Tebow? "Someone should shut down the Catholic Cartoon Blog!"
The list goes on and on...
Funny how some of these speak leagues more about those who agree with this guy's sentiment. The reading NY Times one made me laugh pretty hard too.
EDIT: Woot! 1000th post!
QuoteLike Tebow? Abortion stops a beating heart.
Hate Tebow? Pro-choice all the way, baby!
Like Tebow? Wouldn't watch Bravo TV on a bet.
Hate Tebow? Think same-sex relations are ok!
Like Tebow? Proudly fly that American Flag!
Hate Tebow? Burning the flag is awesome!
Like Tebow? Sundays usually involve Church.
Hate Tebow? Sundays are for reading the NY Times.
Like Tebow? Obama is a communist.
Hate Tebow? Obama is wonderful!
Like Tebow? Fox News is where it's at.
Hate Tebow? MSNBC is your cup of de-caf coffee!
Like Tebow? Like the Catholic Cartoon Blog.
Hate Tebow? "Someone should shut down the Catholic Cartoon Blog!"
The list goes on and on...
Assuming you're referring to how Tebow's a giant hypocrite.
(http://i47.tinypic.com/2dh6ydf.jpg)
Lying for Jesus.
(http://i47.tinypic.com/34np0jq.jpg)
Are they not aware of the kid that reccenlty fell into one of those machines.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m59ckwogMd1rt4pxho1_500.png)
Strange thing is with Gibson service is performed in Latin and rejects Vatican 2 which explains the anti semitismXD
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
Well, nice to see what this cartoonist thinks about the majority of Catholic churches.
This cartoonist seems to be from one of those far-right, ultraconservative, SSPX/Bro. Michael Dimond/Mel Gibson-type splinter churches that hate everybody.
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6SfstKQluk/SrJff19yAoI/AAAAAAAAA2s/QZXTUDHjXNw/s400/MassDestruction.jpg)
Can someone explain to me why they're saying these things are bad?
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m59ckwogMd1rt4pxho1_500.png)*cracks knuckles*
(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m59ckwogMd1rt4pxho1_500.png)*cracks knuckles*
Let's do this!
Dating Sites: E-Harmony, OKCupid!
Month Dedicated towards Race: January thru December
Magazines: Pro Golfers Illustrated
Television: PBS, Fox, Race Network
Clothing Line: Anything from Gap, American Eagle, Wal-Mart and Targét
Scholarship Fund: I've applied to German heritage and Norwegian heritage scholarships plenty of times.
Well, that about wraps it up.
Some do. Like United Negro College Fund, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Black Entertainment Television. That's all that comes immediately to mind, though.
Idris Elba, one of my favourite actors, noted that Inception has not even one black actor.
Idris Elba, one of my favourite actors, noted that Inception has not even one black actor.
Idris Elba, one of my favourite actors, noted that Inception has not even one black actor.
My family has not one black member. I guess that makes us racist, too.
Idris Elba, one of my favourite actors, noted that Inception has not even one black actor.
My family has not one black member. I guess that makes us racist, too.
Do you choose the composition of your family?
"Virus,"
Idris Elba, one of my favourite actors, noted that Inception has not even one black actor.
My family has not one black member. I guess that makes us racist, too.
Or really racist. Note how all the flags under "Earth" are primarily African/Mideast nations, while "Mars" is European/American.
(http://i47.tinypic.com/2dh6ydf.jpg)
....
Or really racist. Note how all the flags under "Earth" are primarily African/Mideast nations, while "Mars" is European/American.
That was my thought, too.
To retain my sanity and my faith in humanity, I'm just going to say it was a very badly done satire in poor taste because some people have the tact of rabid baboons.
-snip-
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/550537_387518637958494_290219177_n.jpg)Yes. That is exactly how it works (http://i.imgur.com/8dXSp.jpg).
-lol minimum wage-If the store I used to work at was suddenly allowed to pay everyone only a dollar an hour, they wouldn't hire any more workers, they'd just pocket the difference. That's because the store already had enough staff to meet its needs. The only thing that would happen would be that the turnover rate would skyrocket because no one would be able to afford the gas to come to work anymore on that pay.
Hell, if everyone was suddenly allowed to pay a dollar an hour, the store would probably fire people because suddenly no one would be able to afford to shop there and it would need even fewer workers to run.
I do like the intern ship point. Interns are basically slaves. It should be illegal.
Yeah. How does getting work experience to earn higher wages later put food in your belly and a roof over your head right now?
Yeah. How does getting work experience to earn higher wages later put food in your belly and a roof over your head right now?
The internship hoop is a service for employers, a requirement for employees. If there was no internship system, the same number- or more- people would be hired in the same jobs. Businesses would just have a slightly worse metric for deciding who to hire. And, of course, they wouldn't get any free labour.
Yeah. How does getting work experience to earn higher wages later put food in your belly and a roof over your head right now?
The internship hoop is a service for employers, a requirement for employees. If there was no internship system, the same number- or more- people would be hired in the same jobs. Businesses would just have a slightly worse metric for deciding who to hire. And, of course, they wouldn't get any free labour.
1) Not all internships are unpaid.
2) You ignore the fact that you are, essentially, working in exchange for college credit in many cases. College credits have monetary value.
Still lower than minimum wage.Again, not all of them. And it is still more money than you would make sitting in a college classroom.
It's particularly outrageous that some interns pay for the privilege.
Interns are basically slaves.
As you've pointed out, students must do internships to get a job, they have no choice. They do work for no wage. If companies want more employees, they can pay for them. They shouldn't be able to exploit students for free. If companies want an employee base with better knowledge than universities can or will provide, they can train them on the job and pay for it.Now that I think about it, the very existence of unpaid internships leads to an interesting conclusion. It means that the employer is able to dictate the terms of the contract. That means there must be very few firms in that market, i.e., there is some sort of oligopsony. That, in turn, suggests that this outcome is inefficient and a more efficient outcome could be brought about by introducing, e.g., a minimum wage. So really, everybody might in fact be better off if minimum wage laws applied to internships, even though they would reduce employment.
As you've pointed out, students must do internships to get a job, they have no choice. They do work for no wage. If companies want more employees, they can pay for them. They shouldn't be able to exploit students for free. If companies want an employee base with better knowledge than universities can or will provide, they can train them on the job and pay for it.Now that I think about it, the very existence of unpaid internships leads to an interesting conclusion. It means that the employer is able to dictate the terms of the contract. That means there must be very few firms in that market, i.e., there is some sort of oligopsony.Quote
I don't follow.
[https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/550537_387518637958494_290219177_n.jpg]Economics 101... too bad you never heard Economics 102...
[https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/550537_387518637958494_290219177_n.jpg]Economics 101... too bad you never heard Economics 102...
That fucking graph is a fucking ideal. Reality has a lot more factors.
Still lower than minimum wage.Again, not all of them. And it is still more money than you would make sitting in a college classroom.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/550537_387518637958494_290219177_n.jpg)
What if you get a crappy internship? Your future potential employer won't give two shits, if you are lucky enough to find a job in this climate there will be hordes of other also hoping to get it.Or if it's like software the internships aren't even considered for the rest of your life. A year of my life, and no one considers it actual work.
(http://i48.tinypic.com/oknzvs.jpg)
I'd say "Citation Needed", but I think we all know that this is bullshit.
(http://i48.tinypic.com/oknzvs.jpg)
I'd say "Citation Needed", but I think we all know that this is bullshit.
(http://i48.tinypic.com/oknzvs.jpg)
I'd say "Citation Needed", but I think we all know that this is bullshit.
I'm pretty sure depression and anxiety don't go away after 12 minutes.
(http://i48.tinypic.com/oknzvs.jpg)
I'd say "Citation Needed", but I think we all know that this is bullshit.
I'm pretty sure depression and anxiety don't go away after 12 minutes.
A psychiatrist I had once called me socially retarded and told me that I have zero friends and am emotionally stunted, etc. etc.. When I got upset and refused to cooperate with her because she was being an ugly cuntface, she used that "12 minutes" line on me, I shit you not. (No, I still wouldn't cooperate.) It's still a little triggering for me because it only happened to me last week, and sent me spiraling into a pretty horrible bout of depression.
I'm not saying you have to spoiler it though, I'll get over what happened... but at my own pace.
[SNIP]
I'd say "Citation Needed", but I think we all know that this is bullshit.
I'm pretty sure depression and anxiety don't go away after 12 minutes.
A psychiatrist I had once called me socially retarded and told me that I have zero friends and am emotionally stunted, etc. etc.. When I got upset and refused to cooperate with her because she was being an ugly cuntface, she used that "12 minutes" line on me, I shit you not. (No, I still wouldn't cooperate.) It's still a little triggering for me because it only happened to me last week, and sent me spiraling into a pretty horrible bout of depression.
I'm not saying you have to spoiler it though, I'll get over what happened... but at my own pace.
Even if you were socially retarded and emotionally stunted and the twelve minutes bullshit was true, it doesn't matter. The entire point of his job is to help you through that. The mind boggles at how someone in the profession could think that.
It's more than insensitive; it's incompetent. You could have got her fired and disbarred. Obviously not right away during the depression, but you could even go ahead and make a complaint now, depending on how long ago it was.
It's more than insensitive; it's incompetent. You could have got her fired and disbarred. Obviously not right away during the depression, but you could even go ahead and make a complaint now, depending on how long ago it was.
We actually are filing a complaint. It's not too long ago.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/550537_387518637958494_290219177_n.jpg)
It's particularly outrageous that some interns pay for the privilege.
Why? How is it any different from a college class? Shit, one could make an argument that an internship is better than a college class because it gives you experience in the real world with people who actually do the job right now. For example, I'm a broadcasting student and the equipment we learn on (in our basic studio production class) is positively ancient, incredibly basic, and very behind the times. Even our professor wasn't an expert on the equipment, because he had never been on the technical side of the job until he got the professor gig. Real TV stations, on the other hand, tend to have more up-to-date equipment and people who are near experts at using it because they use it every single day. A friend of mine even got her "Advanced Studio Production" requirement waived due to the experience her minimum wage paying internship gave her. My school, at least my department, has a "not approved" list of companies who consistently used interns as either gofers (you're there to learn, not pick up coffee) or replacements for paid workers (you're their to learn as much as you can, not perform one task). There are companies that abuse the shit out of their interns, there are schools that don't keep a careful watch on their internship programs, but that does not mean the system itself is what has to be done away with.
Internships can be a way to get your foot in the door as a risk-free method. They don't have to pay to train you, and at the same time, they get to see your work ethic.
Nowadays, you don't even seem to get an interview if they don't like how you cross your t's and dot your i's, so leaving an impression is valuable nowadays.
Arizona disappearing off the face of the map isn't exactly what I'd call a "problem."
Arizona disappearing off the face of the map isn't exactly what I'd call a "problem."
2. In regards to the classy 9/11 reference, it's warrentless wire tapping. God forbid you have to have a good reason to tap someone's phone.
I'll grant you that elections, power and money (possibly also sex) are the biggest concerns your average politician has, I don't think it's fair to suggest they don't care about terrorism.
Internships can be a way to get your foot in the door as a risk-free method. They don't have to pay to train you, and at the same time, they get to see your work ethic.
Nowadays, you don't even seem to get an interview if they don't like how you cross your t's and dot your i's, so leaving an impression is valuable nowadays.
Internships can be a way to get your foot in the door as a risk-free method. They don't have to pay to train you, and at the same time, they get to see your work ethic.
Nowadays, you don't even seem to get an interview if they don't like how you cross your t's and dot your i's, so leaving an impression is valuable nowadays.
Risk: Actually having to pay someone.
Training: Someone else's job.
Work ethic: Getting people to do more for the company, without the company doing more for them.
Interview: Process for screening out introverts and people otherwise bad at doing interviews.
Interview: Process for screening out introverts and people otherwise bad at doing interviews.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5vyutsmyJ1r8o2two1_400.jpg)It's okay Shep I got this one
*sighs*
It's bad that when I saw the tissue, I instantly thought of wiping up a nice solo session, isn't it?
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5vyutsmyJ1r8o2two1_400.jpg)It's okay Shep I got this one
*sighs*
(http://www.prosebeforehos.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/world-war-2-veterna-occupy-wall-street.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5xjpdxKH41rset1wo1_500.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5xjpdxKH41rset1wo1_500.jpg)These people need some remedial english, with the teacher paying specific attention to the section on metaphor.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5xjpdxKH41rset1wo1_500.jpg)
I've never heard of that statement before in my life. I prefer "Keep your laws out of my uterus."
What's funny is, the knowledge of physics necessary to create that technology is based off of the mathematics that was pioneered by, believe it or not, Muslims of the Middle East.AFAIK, the Mongol invasions had a much bigger impact on the disparity between Europe and the Middle East, since Genghis Khan devastated the Middle East but died before getting farther west than Poland.
Well, before the crusades fucked them over and that knowledge was taken.
Since we're giving credit where credit is due.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5vnkpwf5R1qec2uho1_500.jpg)
(http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-02-26/1235606776959.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m651shmIe71rset1wo1_500.jpg)I am so going down the wrong career path.
Is that from Landover Baptist or Objective Ministries?
Is that from Landover Baptist or Objective Ministries?
It's a real site: http://www.secretkeepergirl.com/index.aspx
I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m651shmIe71rset1wo1_500.jpg)
I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
WHORE!
PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
WHORE!
Honestly, "Secret Keeper Girl" fails right off the bat for using the word "tweens."
I don't like the word "tweens." Frankly, the word "pre-teen" means the same thing, is less confusing (when I first saw the word "tween," I honestly thought it meant "people in their early 20's"), and doesn't sound really, really weird.
(http://www.nicksalyers.com/wp-content/gallery/images/monopoly-money-748981.jpg)PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
WHORE!
MONEY OR YOU DON'T GET PICS
I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
WHORE!
PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
WHORE!
MONEY OR YOU DON'T GET PICSHonestly, "Secret Keeper Girl" fails right off the bat for using the word "tweens."
I don't like the word "tweens." Frankly, the word "pre-teen" means the same thing, is less confusing (when I first saw the word "tween," I honestly thought it meant "people in their early 20's"), and doesn't sound really, really weird.
"Tweens" is supposed to be short for "Betweens", as in, between childhood and being a teenager. It's a dumb buzz-word, though, so I prefer "preteens" too.
PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!I failed 4 of the 6 modesty tests. I'm in sweatpants and a t-shirt...
HARLOT!
WHORE!
MONEY OR YOU DON'T GET PICS
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6sn51t9cy1r7jy7zo1_500.jpg)Uh all those are either strawmen or windmills in the case of shitting yourself
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6sn51t9cy1r7jy7zo1_500.jpg)
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/165949_435125553193913_1866213895_n.jpg)
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/165949_435125553193913_1866213895_n.jpg)
Now they're not even trying.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/165949_435125553193913_1866213895_n.jpg)
Now they're not even trying.
I don't even understand what point they're trying to make.
...smoking mirrors?Dangit, beat me to it. :p
WTF? - HE'S the militaristic bully and a toady, ass licking freak for the corporate elite?!?! Has the 'artist' looked at his competition?
"Hi Kettle. My name's Pot. You're black."
"Hi Kettle. My name's Pot. You're black."
That only works if the person supports Romney. It's pretty much spot-on.
...smoking mirrors?Dangit, beat me to it. :p
Or "could of". Gods, I hate it when people write "could of"....smoking mirrors?Dangit, beat me to it. :p
I hate when phrases like that are fucked up. Like "For all intents and purposes" getting turned into "for all intensive purposes."
I don't give a shit if the president's rich. I give a shit about where his millions in campaign money is coming from.
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93658332-distraction.jpg)sigh it's like people don't get that looking at plans he wont really change much
Obama Care = voted on 31 times
President's Jobs Bill = voted on 0 times - blocked for a vote by republicans.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m76p2yDzta1r4pv4yo1_500.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m76p2yDzta1r4pv4yo1_500.jpg)
Please point to a campaign where a candidate's wealth was ever used against them. Romney is, in fact, running on his wealth.
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93658332-distraction.jpg)
Obama Care = voted on 31 times
President's Jobs Bill = voted on 0 times - blocked for a vote by republicans.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/395979_10151644198709119_1943139581_n.jpg)
The usual confusion between peace and Mercedes-Benz?(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/395979_10151644198709119_1943139581_n.jpg)
Why does she have the Mercedes-Benz logo on her shirt?
Why do conservatives think that we should be tolerant of their intolerance?
It works the same as negative numbers.
1 * -1 = -1
Tolerant of intolerance = intolerant
-1 * -1 = 1
Intolerant of intolerance = tolerant
It works the same as negative numbers.
1 * -1 = -1
Tolerant of intolerance = intolerant
-1 * -1 = 1
Intolerant of intolerance = tolerant
Luckily Teabaggers are immune to terrorists attempts at indoctrination known as "Algebra."
Fun fact: Catholics actually believe Mary's hymen was somehow still intact after she gave birth to Jesus. And you can't question that because the Church is infallible.
Baby!Jesus can phase through flesh, that is clearly the only obvious answer to that.
God was forced to give Mary a c-section via the use of his teeth because baby Jesus was a threat to his human mother's life. Unfortunately, the procedure left Mary bleeding to death, so God turned her into a vampire.
Like this one?God was forced to give Mary a c-section via the use of his teeth because baby Jesus was a threat to his human mother's life. Unfortunately, the procedure left Mary bleeding to death, so God turned her into a vampire.
A sparkly vampire!
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7c919EXvY1r5zyv4o1_400.jpg)
SO MUCH FAIL
Like this one?God was forced to give Mary a c-section via the use of his teeth because baby Jesus was a threat to his human mother's life. Unfortunately, the procedure left Mary bleeding to death, so God turned her into a vampire.
A sparkly vampire!
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/297/0/1/sparkly_vampires_by_ryoukazehara-d31guf6.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7c919EXvY1r5zyv4o1_400.jpg)
SO MUCH FAIL
Isn't this pretty much what happened at the Zimmerman case? Lots of people coming up to defend the shooter and simply ignoring or even blaming the victim.
Another thing is that many of them will walk towards a police officer who is pointing a gun at them as if they're Superman, but as soon as they see a Police Dog, (they don't even have to send in the dog, just the dog straining at the leash) they collapse and start begging for mercy.
Sam Adams was protesting against taxes that were too low, also against the legalisation of slavery. A glibertarian he was not.It's amazing how little the Tea Party and other Libertarians/Republicans know about U.S. History. With various movements dedicating themselves to Free-Market Capitalism, oppressing minorities, anti-intellectualism, etc., our founding fathers should be rolling in their graves.
They would like the oppressing minorities but not the rleigious partSam Adams was protesting against taxes that were too low, also against the legalisation of slavery. A glibertarian he was not.It's amazing how little the Tea Party and other Libertarians/Republicans know about U.S. History. With various movements dedicating themselves to Free-Market Capitalism, oppressing minorities, anti-intellectualism, etc., our founding fathers should be rolling in their graves.
Sorry about that. I was arguing with the creator of the poster that it was probably the background that was sparkling.Like this one?God was forced to give Mary a c-section via the use of his teeth because baby Jesus was a threat to his human mother's life. Unfortunately, the procedure left Mary bleeding to death, so God turned her into a vampire.
A sparkly vampire!
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/297/0/1/sparkly_vampires_by_ryoukazehara-d31guf6.jpg)
Noooooooo! Moka doesn't sparkle, its a lieeeeeeee! She's just adorable.
…or that the recall was somehow cheating or something?
...Wait, how come Wisconsin was mostly blue, and yet we still kept Scott Fucker in office?
Do the people who voted for Obama really seem to think Scott is such a great man, or that the recall was somehow cheating or something?
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/582236_399192790138358_1217102506_n.jpg)
They left off one of the most important labels! That stripe of Democratic Counties across the South is known as the Black Belt. It's where all of the Black people live. How could they not have labeled that?
And that's the real vote by county map, Ironbite.(click to show/hide)
Sorry, the map is huge, so I hid it.
They left off one of the most important labels! That stripe of Democratic Counties across the South is known as the Black Belt. It's where all of the Black people live. How could they not have labeled that?
And that's the real vote by county map, Ironbite.(click to show/hide)
Sorry, the map is huge, so I hid it.
Wait...Grant county (in AR, below Pulaski in the middle) was BLUE?! What in the fuck? I always thought this was one of the most ass-backwards places in the entire state...
(http://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/mmedia/lp/8kv/hggt/3175/normal_1015711038.jpg)
This actually has a good point. If you think eating meat is murder, you think other people are murdering animals.Yeah. It's actually perfectly reasonable within their not entirely unreasonable (imo) worldview.
Of course, there are some folks who go so far as to even limit themselves to eating fruit and other such products that don’t involve killing the plant…Yum, plant ovaries.
Of course, there are some folks who go so far as to even limit themselves to eating fruit and other such products that don’t involve killing the plant…
Yes, it's sad that animals die so we can consume their flesh, but that's life. Lions kill and eat their prey.
Yes, it's sad that animals die so we can consume their flesh, but that's life. Lions kill and eat their prey.
Naturalism fallacy.
Actually, if we're talking about killing things in nasty ways, I have a funny story. Humans have a lot of endurance compared to most animals. So pre-tool humans used to chase after, say, deer until the deer died of exhaustion. Checkmate,
Yes, it's sad that animals die so we can consume their flesh, but that's life. Lions kill and eat their prey.
Naturalism fallacy.
Actually, if we're talking about killing things in nasty ways, I have a funny story. Humans have a lot of endurance compared to most animals. So pre-tool humans used to chase after, say, deer until the deer died of exhaustion. Checkmate,
Um, humans may have endurance, but we don't have nearly the speed of a deer. We threw spears at them, then later used slings and bows.
Of course, there are some folks who go so far as to even limit themselves to eating fruit and other such products that don’t involve killing the plant…
*head desks*
Yes, it's sad that animals die so we can consume their flesh, but that's life. Lions kill and eat their prey.
Naturalism fallacy.
Yes, it's sad that animals die so we can consume their flesh, but that's life. Lions kill and eat their prey.
Naturalism fallacy.
What?
I'm not saying it as an excuse for cruelly killing animals, but moreso the fact that our bodies are designed to eat meat, and you can't get meat without killing animals.
How about we say "Plants have feelings too!" and call it a day on this?
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying that you can't logically justify something on the basis that lions do it. That's a naturalism fallacy- what is does not necessary equal what ought to be.
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying that you can't logically justify something on the basis that lions do it. That's a naturalism fallacy- what is does not necessary equal what ought to be.
There's got to be some kind of fallacy in separating humans from other animals when it comes to deciding the moral implications of meat eating. Lions kill and eat other animals because that is what they evolved to do, just as humans did.
Again, does natural always equal right? No.
Again, does natural always equal right? No.
Fair enough. So the people who argue that homosexuality is wrong have a valid point then? The few who acknowledge that it does occur in nature, I mean.
1. Some non-human animals exhibit homosexuality.Again, does natural always equal right? No.
Fair enough. So the people who argue that homosexuality is wrong have a valid point then? The few who acknowledge that it does occur in nature, I mean.
1. Some non-human animals exhibit homosexuality.Again, does natural always equal right? No.
Fair enough. So the people who argue that homosexuality is wrong have a valid point then? The few who acknowledge that it does occur in nature, I mean.
2. If a non-human animal does something, then humans shouldn't do it.
3. Therefore humans ought not be homosexual.
1'. Some non-human animals exhibit altruism.
2. [As above.]
3'. Therefore humans should not be altruistic.
The unsound premise is (2.), i.e., that humans shouldn't do anything that non-humans do.
In general: something may exist in nature, but that fact tells you nothing about whether it's right or wrong.
1. Some non-human animals exhibit homosexuality.Again, does natural always equal right? No.
Fair enough. So the people who argue that homosexuality is wrong have a valid point then? The few who acknowledge that it does occur in nature, I mean.
2. If a non-human animal does something, then humans shouldn't do it.
3. Therefore humans ought not be homosexual.
For all the vegans out there I feel I just have to leave this here.That is um... kinda broken.
#Invalid YouTube Link#
And they call Democrats the party of the KKK.
I'm going to assume that the person who made that knew what he was doing.
And they call Democrats the party of the KKK.(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m764dyC2Go1r76p23o1_400.jpg)
And they call Democrats the party of the KKK.
Speaking of which...
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m764dyC2Go1r76p23o1_400.jpg)
I think we can all say "Not even fucking comparable"
(http://i48.tinypic.com/2z8p4xs.jpg)Going point by point:
That's parody, right? It's from politifake.org and their tagline is "daily doses of political parody," but I would expect an actual political parody site to mock both sides, and they don't seem to.
Please let it be parody...
That's parody, right? It's from politifake.org and their tagline is "daily doses of political parody," but I would expect an actual political parody site to mock both sides, and they don't seem to.
Please let it be parody...
The demotivational might be a parody, but the image in the inset seems to be genuine.
(http://www.sl-webs.com/custimages/dd395-Destroy-site.jpg)
...I don't know if this is supposed to portray some kind of symbolic evil ritual, be a general symbolic representation of what Dees thinks is going on in the world, or if that's supposed to be some kind of "voodoo globe" they're about to stab.
I really hope its the last one.
I also like that either Skeletor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeletor), Doctor Destiny (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Destiny), or Thulsa Doom (http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/thulsa.htm) is a member of the Zionist Conspiracy. Also, Obama seems really "meh" about the proceedings.
And here I'd believe they're carving the world up simply because they're a bunch of greedy fucks. Religion's got nothing to do with it.
And here I'd believe they're carving the world up simply because they're a bunch of greedy fucks. Religion's got nothing to do with it.
Really? Bill Gates is a greedy fuck? Rich as hell, successful as shit, yeah. But anyone who pledges to give 50% of their fortune to charity is no what I call "greedy". If that's Ted Turner on the far right of the picture, he's also not in the "Romney" class of rich dude.
And even that could be solved by a good, ol-fashioned Sandman taint punching.
Yes, I just used your sigquote because my brain's still barely working.
And here I'd believe they're carving the world up simply because they're a bunch of greedy fucks. Religion's got nothing to do with it.
Really? Bill Gates is a greedy fuck?
*Yeah, that was a pretty major fuck-up. Incidentally, the "gunwalking" program that lead to this scandal began in 2006. That does not make the Obama Administration's continuation of it OK, it makes both Bush and Obama fuck-ups on this.
what about the tracker batteries
How'd he make the money? Charity gives power, too.By being a ruthless - but generally ethical - business person. There's a world of difference between the kind of power Bill Gates had and the kind of power Mitt Romney has, a world of difference between the long-term impacts of how they got the power, and a world of difference in how they use it.
Actually, the so called 'Fast and Furious' thing turns out to be a lie. It never happened.Not for nothing, but Wikipedia (I know) says that the ATF was running the kind of stings that caused the scandal on and off from 2006-2011. Five years, give or take. There was no movement on the cases the earlier operations until Obama took office. No matter what, these stings were cluster fucks on the part of the ATF. Accidentally allowing hundreds of guns end up in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels isn't that much better than doing it on purpose.
How'd he make the money? Charity gives power, too.By being a ruthless - but generally ethical - business person.
Actually, the so called 'Fast and Furious' thing turns out to be a lie. It never happened.No matter what, these stings were cluster fucks on the part of the ATF. Accidentally allowing hundreds of guns end up in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels isn't that much better than doing it on purpose.
By being a ruthless - but generally ethical - business person. There's a world of difference between the kind of power Bill Gates had and the kind of power Mitt Romney has, a world of difference between the long-term impacts of how they got the power, and a world of difference in how they use it.
(http://www.sl-webs.com/custimages/dd395-Destroy-site.jpg)
...I don't know if this is supposed to portray some kind of symbolic evil ritual, be a general symbolic representation of what Dees thinks is going on in the world, or if that's supposed to be some kind of "voodoo globe" they're about to stab.
I really hope its the last one.
I also like that either Skeletor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeletor), Doctor Destiny (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Destiny), or Thulsa Doom (http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/thulsa.htm) is a member of the Zionist Conspiracy. Also, Obama seems really "meh" about the proceedings.
Some conspiracy theories state that the most powerful and rich people in the world are actually a part of a satanic cult, which may or may not take place at the Bohemian Grove but usually involves some kind of blood sacrifice. They are cutting up the globe to represent how they're sacrificing the world for their god Satan, and also dividing total power over the world amongst themselves to further their shadowy agenda. They are also wearing Stars of David with Zs on them because that apparently means Zionism has something to do with it. (In the background, there's also an icon of an owl with the letters "BC" next to it. I don't know what that stands for, but IIRC the owl is a mascot of the Bohemian Grove.)
... I know too much.
(http://inthereddest.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/green_eggs_and_obama.jpg)
(http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/559298_502000289815419_2081944628_n.jpg)
(http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/559298_502000289815419_2081944628_n.jpg)
Romney planned it first.
And I would like to remind everyone that so-callled “Obamacare” is what remained after all the back and forth in Congress.
Course the legislative back-and-forth is also Obama's fault. He's head of the party that had 60 senators and the House.
Course the legislative back-and-forth is also Obama's fault. He's head of the party that had 60 senators and the House.
IIRC, there were not 60 Democratic Senators, as the majority was not fillibuster-proof.
my most recent phone cost $30 (as in, a one-time fee, and I can use it for over 200 more days before having to buy a small bunch of minutes to extend my time by several months.) and can take pictures.
That is an ugly shirt, and it's crime that costs $900, let alone it even exists in the first place.
Something posted by brother in law, who can be an asshole at times.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/s480x480/418396_10151172105585555_609409291_n.jpg)
I'll like to know how much they know the cellphone in question cost, that it's even a "Blackberry" to begin with it, it could be one of those tracfones, most cellphones no matter how cheap they are have the ability to take a photo nowadays.
So, if I spend $500 on a phone, that makes me immune from experiencing any sort of financial disaster that leaves me with nothing but my $500 phone and the clothes on my back?
If I am poor and have trouble affording food, that prevents me from winning a phone or borrowing one belonging to a friend?
So, if I spend $500 on a phone, that makes me immune from experiencing any sort of financial disaster that leaves me with nothing but my $500 phone and the clothes on my back?
If I am poor and have trouble affording food, that prevents me from winning a phone or borrowing one belonging to a friend?
Yes, and yes.
Because libertarianism.
You can't get a job without a phone number.
You can't get a job without a phone number.Yes but you see Zach the free market rules that you can;t afford a phone number you dont deserve a job
I wonder if these Rand worshipers ever realized that.
Also how do they know the person taking the photo is homeless and not just someone there to take a picture?
Also how do they know the person taking the photo is homeless and not just someone there to take a picture?
He's black.
That is an ugly shirt, and it's crime that costs $900, let alone it even exists in the first place.
Something posted by brother in law, who can be an asshole at times.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/s480x480/418396_10151172105585555_609409291_n.jpg)
I'll like to know how much they know the cellphone in question cost, that it's even a "Blackberry" to begin with it, it could be one of those tracfones, most cellphones no matter how cheap they are have the ability to take a photo nowadays.
Three words:
Blue Dog Democrats.
Why? Obama was an idiot who wanted to "change politics" and not bully and strong arm. People complain about lock-step politics, and when someone tries not to use them, they get criticized and punished for it.
Three words:
Blue Dog Democrats.
The last word is Democrat. Even they would not so snub the party as to join a partisan fillibuster of an election promise. Okay, so you've got past the fillibuster, now you need 50 senators and the VP. The Republicans and their stooges can vote against all they want, won't matter.
QuoteWhy? Obama was an idiot who wanted to "change politics" and not bully and strong arm. People complain about lock-step politics, and when someone tries not to use them, they get criticized and punished for it.
This. I'd also suggest that he's a fairly extreme conservative.
Three words:
Blue Dog Democrats.
The last word is Democrat. Even they would not so snub the party as to join a partisan fillibuster of an election promise. Okay, so you've got past the fillibuster, now you need 50 senators and the VP. The Republicans and their stooges can vote against all they want, won't matter.
All the same, it didn’t turn out that way, did it?
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93980712-liberals-against-guns.jpg)
Yes - because an organized army with flintlock rifles = a single paranoid nut with 20 assault rifles...
Those soldiers were from the government, they're qualified.Listen Obamacare is basically what the king of freemarket Switzerland did
(http://api.ning.com/files/S77dWij36wLmdZ2XZk*3KCgov4Mn66XlcH9FckrsIR01It9jSbJ5VDTxS9O55QgljSfZw-ARp3U9Q67pGqpZyM*xHDg9tWuU/HydrogenBarackside.jpg?width=551&height=405)
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93980713-more-gun-control.jpg)I wonder if the guy gets that there is an increase in skin cancer due to tanning beds
Yes, because contracting skin cancer and being shot are the same.
Why does the anchorman have a sink on his desk?lol - I think it's supposed to be a screen.
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93980713-more-gun-control.jpg)
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93980712-liberals-against-guns.jpg)
Yes - because an organized army with flintlock rifles = a single paranoid nut with 20 assault rifles...
(http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/609/93980712-liberals-against-guns.jpg)
Yes - because an organized army with flintlock rifles = a single paranoid nut with 20 assault rifles...
Be as paranoid as you want(I might think it's unwarranted) and have as many guns of all shape and size as you want(Can I shoot that mini-gun?), just don't be a dumbass and shoot someone accidentally or intentionally. Most of the people I know of that have more than a couple guns follow the basic rules of gun safety more then anyone else. Unless someone poses an actual threat to you, don't shoot them, that means has a weapon pointed in your direction. If someone breaks into your house generally you holding a gun is more then enough to make them listen to you when you say "hands up, and lay on the floor" then have someone else call the police, or if you want to humiliate the guy more make him call the police himself.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NdBxyJAe4K8/TV7eUbcvNAI/AAAAAAAAGvM/VGozKqBqLJ4/s1600/Big%2BUnion.jpg)
Are you fucking kidding me?! :o
If they keep projecting like this they might put someone's eye out.
What is this I don't even...
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ugpkLWe01qzeo2zo1_500.jpg)
This one's linked for size... (http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2tzr3iTGs1r2nnixo1_1280.png)
That's far from the only thing wrong with that picture.What is this I don't even...
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524111_1618489194558_1606230469_31288250_166664710_n.jpg)
The Fascists & Nazis should be on the Far-Right.
It would make a heck of a Prog rock concept album cover. The songs will be about spaceships, hobbits, butterfly sneezes, and all kinds of other weird stuff.
If you're wondering what the album cover has to do with that, you just don't know Prog.
;)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ugpkLWe01qzeo2zo1_500.jpg)
This one's linked for size... (http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2tzr3iTGs1r2nnixo1_1280.png)
Homophobic, Transphobic & Ethnibigoted! Is that weird monkey-creature-looking-thing supposed to be a BLACK MAN?
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ugpkLWe01qzeo2zo1_500.jpg)
Homophobic, Transphobic & Ethnibigoted! Is that weird monkey-creature-looking-thing supposed to be a BLACK MAN?
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m828952xjj1rch2ido1_500.jpg)
Homophobic, Transphobic & Ethnibigoted! Is that weird monkey-creature-looking-thing supposed to be a BLACK MAN?
It's Bi-Curious George, well known supporter of the gay agenda.
Homophobic, Transphobic & Ethnibigoted! Is that weird monkey-creature-looking-thing supposed to be a BLACK MAN?
It's Bi-Curious George, well known supporter of the gay agenda.
(http://i.imgur.com/p5URJ.jpg)
The headline takes up the entire front page!
What was the photo that was supposed to be so bad?
For those who may ask what they can do to honor Neil, we have a simple request. Honor his example of service, accomplishment and modesty, and the next time you walk outside on a clear night and see the moon smiling down at you, think of Neil Armstrong and give him a wink.
I just looks like a standard publicity shot to me. A little arty, but not too far out of the ordinary.
Without the context though, I wouldn't have made the connection.
I thought it was a she?
I'm not kidding when I say she looks exactly like my former friend in the face.
I don't know what that says about him or her, but I'm really not kidding here.
I'm not kidding when I say she looks exactly like my former friend in the face.
I don't know what that says about him or her, but I'm really not kidding here.
That they're both highly androgynous? Honestly, I couldn't have told ya the gender of that person and been 100% sure of it. Like a fuckin Final Fantasy character...
I don't think anyone claims that fetuses aren't human, dude. They might claim they are not a person, but that's a different matter. Whereas a person on welfare is quite clearly a person. And a person on welfare isn't living in someone else's body either. So basically, comparison fail.
Plus, this one really brings out the conservative agenda of "I'm all for life, until the bastard's born".
I tried to look on KYM to see if they had that person's identity, but after fifteen minutes of trying to get the site to load all its scripts and images, I gave up. Anybody else wants to try, go for it.
(Seriously, some sites I feel like I'm back in the days of 48k dialup :( )
I don't think anyone claims that fetuses aren't human, dude. They might claim they are not a person, but that's a different matter. Whereas a person on welfare is quite clearly a person. And a person on welfare isn't living in someone else's body either. So basically, comparison fail.aint that the truth
Plus, this one really brings out the conservative agenda of "I'm all for life, until the bastard's born".
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/399637_398295470226390_2059665511_n.jpg)
Doy.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/557260_413923852001083_883879171_n.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/430398_464435603587999_897167568_n.jpg)
Alright, yet another excuse to argue against a pro-lifer/anti-choicer's macro carrying their arguements on what is "life." Allow me to argue about what is "life," and also, what is "sentience."
Egg cells, sperm cells, embryo/fetus = not sentient.
Newborn baby, older human being = sentient.
This is why contraception (sperm cells are blocked from the uterus and/or prevented from fertilizing the egg), menstruation (the egg cell shreds the walls of the uterus, causing vaginal bleeding), masturbation (sperm cells are ejaculated from the penis, usually to be caught by tissue or toilet paper or even land on someone else), non-procreative sex (notably oral or anal sex, sex with the use of contraceptives like condoms or spermicides and non-penetrative sex), and finally, abortion (terminating an embryo or fetus and removing it from the womb, most commonly by the vacuum tube method) are not heinous while infanticide (killing a baby after birth) is. But of course, anti-choicers (depending on how zealous and militant they are) would like to claim that killing any or all of the above non-sentient lifeforms is like killing the sentient lifeform. Then again, I am an unapologetic supporter of abortion and contraception and I am saddened by the very fact that so many politicians and "grannies" are fighting against our choices and expecting women to be breeders and not someone of as much importance as a man. Lastly, I would like to say that to claim that an egg cell (fertilized or not), sperm cells, and an embryo/fetus are people is batshit insane and I don't know why it's so hard to argue against it in states like Oklahoma, Virginia, and where else this bullshit "Personhood Amendment" is in place.
(I would like to dedicate this post to Paul Ryan, who is the new Rick Santorum, and who should stick a tampon up his ass. I would also like to dedicate this lengthy post to all those assholes who have approved of the Personhood Amendment and who are defunding and even hindering funding for Planned Parenthood, despite the fact that abortions are only 3% of their services.)
(http://thepeoplescube.com/red/gallery/superkommissar-maksim-a38/obamacard-ad-tpc-i2946.jpg)
Funny how conservatives bitch about people being on food stamps, but haven't done shit to help people move off of food stamps.
(http://thepeoplescube.com/red/gallery/superkommissar-maksim-a38/obamacard-ad-tpc-i2946.jpg)
Funny how conservatives bitch about people being on food stamps, but haven't done shit to help people move off of food stamps.
You mean... Actually... Interact with p-p-poor people?! What? You think they're actually people?
According to conservatives, Obama is responsible for everything that occurred on or after January 1 2009.
Alright, yet another excuse to argue against a pro-lifer/anti-choicer's macro carrying their arguements on what is "life." Allow me to argue about what is "life," and also, what is "sentience."
Egg cells, sperm cells, embryo/fetus = not sentient.
Newborn baby, older human being = sentient.
This is why contraception (sperm cells are blocked from the uterus and/or prevented from fertilizing the egg), menstruation (the egg cell shreds the walls of the uterus, causing vaginal bleeding), masturbation (sperm cells are ejaculated from the penis, usually to be caught by tissue or toilet paper or even land on someone else), non-procreative sex (notably oral or anal sex, sex with the use of contraceptives like condoms or spermicides and non-penetrative sex), and finally, abortion (terminating an embryo or fetus and removing it from the womb, most commonly by the vacuum tube method) are not heinous while infanticide (killing a baby after birth) is. But of course, anti-choicers (depending on how zealous and militant they are) would like to claim that killing any or all of the above non-sentient lifeforms is like killing the sentient lifeform. Then again, I am an unapologetic supporter of abortion and contraception and I am saddened by the very fact that so many politicians and "grannies" are fighting against our choices and expecting women to be breeders and not someone of as much importance as a man. Lastly, I would like to say that to claim that an egg cell (fertilized or not), sperm cells, and an embryo/fetus are people is batshit insane and I don't know why it's so hard to argue against it in states like Oklahoma, Virginia, and where else this bullshit "Personhood Amendment" is in place.
(I would like to dedicate this post to Paul Ryan, who is the new Rick Santorum, and who should stick a tampon up his ass. I would also like to dedicate this lengthy post to all those assholes who have approved of the Personhood Amendment and who are defunding and even hindering funding for Planned Parenthood, despite the fact that abortions are only 3% of their services.)
(http://thepeoplescube.com/red/gallery/superkommissar-maksim-a38/obamacard-ad-tpc-i2946.jpg)
Funny how conservatives bitch about people being on food stamps, but haven't done shit to help people move off of food stamps.
According to conservatives, Obama is responsible for everything that occurred on or after January 1 2009.
The stupider ones think everything was hunky-dory before 11 November 2008, then shit exploded because a black guy came into office.
(http://thepeoplescube.com/red/gallery/superkommissar-maksim-a38/obamacard-ad-tpc-i2946.jpg)Why would they do that? They're convinced people are only using federal assistance because they're lazy.
Funny how conservatives bitch about people being on food stamps, but haven't done shit to help people move off of food stamps.
Which is funny given that the states that tend to be more conservative are the biggest welfare moochers around (http://www.alternet.org/story/154338/ayn_rand_worshippers_should_face_facts%3A_blue_states_are_the_providers%2C_red_states_are_the_parasites). I still say we should give them what they want so much, but I'm a BITCH, so...
classic:
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb6pzdEdDi1rawnpqo1_500.jpg)
Wait... When did Obama take away private ownership? And did he really take over all media in USA? Because if he did that then how come FOX is still against him?Fox News admitted that the AHCA reduced the deficit. (http://www.classwarfareexists.com/fox-news-just-admitted-obamacare-reduces-the-deficit/) All the other shit they're spewing is just making things look plausible, like you suggested.
I mean I can obviously understand that if he controls all media then the media can't say anything about it (That is the best part about conspiracy theories. All evidence against it is a coverup!) and I would even understand allowing SOME negative portrayal of himself, just to make things look more plausible, but why allow FOX news making all that insane bullshit? I mean no one in their right mind would actually believe that those people are serious.
And wasn't it rebublicans who were against schools teaching critical thinking?Yes. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/texas-gop-rejects-critical-thinking-skills-really/2012/07/08/gJQAHNpFXW_blog.html)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_maxvjz2rjk1qajfbxo1_400.png)That's either the greatest or most horrible political cartoon I've ever seen. Largely because the monocle makes me assume the guy's a republican. It's actually funny when you assume that.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_maxvjz2rjk1qajfbxo1_400.png)That's either the greatest or most horrible political cartoon I've ever seen. Largely because the monocle makes me assume the guy's a republican. It's actually funny when you assume that.
(click to show/hide)
Oh and this:
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbcg4i71gf1rtqe8to1_500.jpg)
I highly doubt Mitt is going to bring us back to a Clinton era economy.
If it is, it would've made more sense to use chickens instead, since Chick Fil A is mainly a chicken place.
If it is, it would've made more sense to use chickens instead, since Chick Fil A is mainly a chicken place.
Like RavynousHunter said, their ads show cows holding signs advocating for the restaurant and/or against burgers (presumably so they won't become burgers). The cartoon is showing the their spokescows advocating for the first amendment rights of the company.
Which, with the exception of Chicago and at least one other city who tried to keep them out using the law, completely misses the point of the first amendment.
Thanks for the clarification, there are no Chick Fil A's around where I live, so I've never saw any of the commericals, not to mention I don't watch much TV to begin with.
There's no Chik-Fil-A around here, either.
There is no Chik-Fil-A within a hundred miles of here.So Chick-fil-A must be a Southerner thing. Then again, the headquarters is located in Georgia, a state run by reactionary fuckholes against LGBT and reproductive rights, even teaching evolution (and dismissing creationism as a bunch of balderdash, which it is). I feel sorry for anyone who lives there (shout out to SpaceProg for being the few Georgians who are able to think with a properly functioning mind) and who has to deal with this bullshit.
Thanks for the clarification, there are no Chick Fil A's around where I live, so I've never saw any of the commericals, not to mention I don't watch much TV to begin with.There's no Chik-Fil-A around here, either.There is no Chik-Fil-A within a hundred miles of here.So Chick-fil-A must be a Southerner thing. Then again, the headquarters is located in Georgia, a state run by reactionary fuckholes against LGBT and reproductive rights, even teaching evolution (and dismissing creationism as a bunch of balderdash, which it is). I feel sorry for anyone who lives there (shout out to SpaceProg for being the few Georgians who are able to think with a properly functioning mind) and who has to deal with this bullshit.
...But that's not to say that Texas (where I live) isn't also a reactionary shithole run by complete dumbasses against LGBT and reproductive rights as well...
You'll never get away from the ignorant or stupid rednecks though, as they're everywhere on the planet.
The worst state is probably Oklahoma.
I'm basing my hatred off of MadCat's thread :DYou'll never get away from the ignorant or stupid rednecks though, as they're everywhere on the planet.
BINGO, even here in NY, we have a few, though most of ignorant folks tend to be the "educated" ones, that buy conservative bs, just so they can make an extra buck, and not give a shit about their fellow human being.The worst state is probably Oklahoma.
Are you baiting Damen,and MadCat??
The worst state is probably Oklahoma.
My grandparents insist that the homeless in their area spent too much time using the phones to socialize instead of trying to turn their situation around. If that's the case more often than not, then I'm inclined to agree that it's a rather careless policy/program.There is comfort in contact with another person - and security in knowing you can call for help - I don't like that they can be abused - but I'm not sure if I would want to throw the baby out with that bathwater...
The characters in the comic, on the other hand, were created by a jackass.
...why is it a bad thing to give poor people cheap cell phones? We live in an age where you can be homeless and still be able to get in contact with other people and there are seriously those who view it as a bad thing?We're giving poor people things for free, of course it's wrong. I mean we can look into this deeper, but your typical republican who agrees with that comic isn't getting past that level.
I suppose it's not actually a cartoon but...
(http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/1/9/5/0/9/2/6/slut-73894355126.jpeg)
1. Sandra Fluke is not single, she's engaged.
2. She never claimed to "have sex so often she goes broke buying birth control."
3. Who called Palin a slut? No, really, who? I assumed we all just called her stupid. Like the person who came up with this image.
I suppose it's not actually a cartoon but...
(http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/1/9/5/0/9/2/6/slut-73894355126.jpeg)
1. Sandra Fluke is not single, she's engaged.
2. She never claimed to "have sex so often she goes broke buying birth control."
3. Who called Palin a slut? No, really, who? I assumed we all just called her stupid. Like the person who came up with this image.
#2 really confuses and angers me. The number of birth control pills you take isn't related to how often you're having sex at all. It's a daily pill. Whether you have sex once a month, or 3 times a day, you're still taking the same exact amount of birth control.
You people don't know anything! All birth control is condoms, which are 100% effective 100% of the time. Also, only whores use condoms. If you disagree, then you are obviously a whoreHuh, It thought it was sailors.
I thought condoms let through every single virus while stopping sperm because condoms are really extremely tiny nets or something.
</joking>
My grandparents insist that the homeless in their area spent too much time using the phones to socialize instead of trying to turn their situation around. If that's the case more often than not, then I'm inclined to agree that it's a rather careless policy/program.
The characters in the comic, on the other hand, were created by a jackass.
I thought condoms let through every single virus while stopping sperm because condoms are really extremely tiny nets or something.
</joking>
My mother has actually said this and was completely serious.
...
...and she's been an LPN for over 30 years.
Reaganomics: Start a billion dollar business in your parents garage... Provided said parents have enough money to send you to high prestige private schools.And enough money to loan you $20,000 in start-up funds.
Well, they should, those filthy beggars. They go from port to port.You people don't know anything! All birth control is condoms, which are 100% effective 100% of the time. Also, only whores use condoms. If you disagree, then you are obviously a whoreHuh, It thought it was sailors.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/380439_10151020897930911_63987750_n.jpg)
...those are some atrociously drawn cartoons right there.
Hey, did you guys know Conservapedia has its own political cartoons section (http://conservapedia.com/Category:Editorial_Cartoons)? Well, you do now!
Their children mean nothing to them, they're little more than trophies. Something to be taken out and shown to the neighbors, to be polished and made into whatever image they desire, and woe betide anyone who dares try to turn them into individuals. Proof of male virility, female fertility, of supposed kindness, capacity to love, and caring...or, at least, so they think. Having a child only proves that your sex organs function normally. Raising a child is what proves your capacity as a parent.
Their children mean nothing to them, they're little more than trophies. Something to be taken out and shown to the neighbors, to be polished and made into whatever image they desire, and woe betide anyone who dares try to turn them into individuals. Proof of male virility, female fertility, of supposed kindness, capacity to love, and caring...or, at least, so they think. Having a child only proves that your sex organs function normally. Raising a child is what proves your capacity as a parent.
It means you can put another stick figure on the back window of your minivan.
I think you'll find that he just likes dressing up as Jareth the goblin' king.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc202jtjyb1rg6quvo6_500.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/304481_485641081470827_312605314_n.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/304481_485641081470827_312605314_n.jpg)
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/3725_367842259973472_2098642186_n.jpg)
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/3725_367842259973472_2098642186_n.jpg)
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones man. Seriously, Texas is a state that makes those of us here in Georgia feel good about ourselves in comparison.Thanks for the clarification, there are no Chick Fil A's around where I live, so I've never saw any of the commericals, not to mention I don't watch much TV to begin with.There's no Chik-Fil-A around here, either.There is no Chik-Fil-A within a hundred miles of here.So Chick-fil-A must be a Southerner thing. Then again, the headquarters is located in Georgia, a state run by reactionary fuckholes against LGBT and reproductive rights, even teaching evolution (and dismissing creationism as a bunch of balderdash, which it is). I feel sorry for anyone who lives there (shout out to SpaceProg for being the few Georgians who are able to think with a properly functioning mind) and who has to deal with this bullshit.
...But that's not to say that Texas (where I live) isn't also a reactionary shithole run by complete dumbasses against LGBT and reproductive rights as well...
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md3iq6mqw31rjrwdzo1_500.jpg)And just to let you know, Mother Teresa just hoarded a bunch of dying people and didn't take care of them. All she did with them was cry and pray for them as they die from illness. She isn't "Pro-life," rather a psychopath who should be dishonored in the same ranks of people like Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Pol Pot, Osama bin Laden, etc.
She believed that suffering brought one closer to Christ, or something like that.
I've got a question a little out of line with the thread, if I was to go out and collect all the random political signs beloging to the local republican who lost the election, then arranged them into spelling "HA" and took a picture, would that go into this thread or the best thread? I'm a tad tired of still seeing them.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/549123_528206147208607_701425537_n.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/46235_527742523921636_181339177_n.jpg)
[img]https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/549123_528206147208607_701425537_n.jpg
Throughout his 15-year career at Bain Capital, which bought, sold, and merged dozens of companies, Romney had other chances to fight to save jobs, but didn't. His ultimate responsibility was to make money for Bain's investors, former partners said.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/46235_527742523921636_181339177_n.jpg)
I don't get what Obama is doing, is he inserting a coin in her like a vending machine?
I don't get what Obama is doing, is he inserting a coin in her like a vending machine?
Birth control pills, with an Obama logo on the package.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LMsvw9I4Jns/SI3yoSrPwRI/AAAAAAAAAiM/wAqoln3phhA/s400/Birth_Control_pack.jpg)
I don't get what Obama is doing, is he inserting a coin in her like a vending machine?
Birth control pills, with an Obama logo on the package.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LMsvw9I4Jns/SI3yoSrPwRI/AAAAAAAAAiM/wAqoln3phhA/s400/Birth_Control_pack.jpg)
Well, now I feel silly. :P
I don't get what Obama is doing, is he inserting a coin in her like a vending machine?
Birth control pills, with an Obama logo on the package.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LMsvw9I4Jns/SI3yoSrPwRI/AAAAAAAAAiM/wAqoln3phhA/s400/Birth_Control_pack.jpg)
Well, now I feel silly. :P
To be fair, I have never seen one of those before.
In my experience they come in standard foil packaging like asprin or whatever
I don't get what Obama is doing, is he inserting a coin in her like a vending machine?
Birth control pills, with an Obama logo on the package.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LMsvw9I4Jns/SI3yoSrPwRI/AAAAAAAAAiM/wAqoln3phhA/s400/Birth_Control_pack.jpg)
Well, now I feel silly. :P
To be fair, I have never seen one of those before.
In my experience they come in standard foil packaging like asprin or whatever
That's the old packaging scheme, I believe. The round one, I mean.
Y-You mean that isn't a coin slot?...I don't get what Obama is doing, is he inserting a coin in her like a vending machine?
Birth control pills, with an Obama logo on the package.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LMsvw9I4Jns/SI3yoSrPwRI/AAAAAAAAAiM/wAqoln3phhA/s400/Birth_Control_pack.jpg)
Mine comes to me like this:
(https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/static/drugency/images/QLT76090.JPG)
and slides into a paper slip thing.
Actually, in my wife's, each week is a different color.
Really? I heard that menstruation was kinda...unnecessary. I know that the last girl I was with (and, yes, I'm sickened to say that) had an IUD, and hadn't had a period in 5 years, with no ill effects.
I think it is because the pills taken during the period don't actually do anything. The only reason that they are included is to keep you in the habit of taking the pill every day. Presumably, they're visibly different because it would be bad to accidentally take a sugar pill instead of a real pill at any other point in the month. Actually, in my wife's, each week is a different color.
Because that's the fucking Master Sword the dude is swinging.Oh my god it is.
Because that's the fucking Master Sword the dude is swinging.Oh my god it is.
But...that picture is very skillfully done I must admit.
...is the punchline vulture capitalism?Because that's the fucking Master Sword the dude is swinging.Oh my god it is.
But...that picture is very skillfully done I must admit.
Yeah, Dees' art skills aren't lacking. When he's not making a batshit conspiracy picture about Jews, Big Pharma, etc. Found this on his site as well:
(http://www.r-sw.com/custimages/dd395-Jetpack-site.jpg)
I found his website (http://daletoons.blogspot.com/). I see no indication that he isn't serious.
Incidentally, he are a few more of his works.(click to show/hide)
"Stankity?"Why is she so buff?
Why is Michelle Obama talking like the stereotypical Sassy Black Woman, instead of like, well, Michelle Obama?
"Stankity?"Why is she so buff?
Why is Michelle Obama talking like the stereotypical Sassy Black Woman, instead of like, well, Michelle Obama?
"Stankity?"Why is she so buff?
Why is Michelle Obama talking like the stereotypical Sassy Black Woman, instead of like, well, Michelle Obama?
...is the punchline vulture capitalism?Because that's the fucking Master Sword the dude is swinging.Oh my god it is.
But...that picture is very skillfully done I must admit.
Yeah, Dees' art skills aren't lacking. When he's not making a batshit conspiracy picture about Jews, Big Pharma, etc. Found this on his site as well:
(http://www.r-sw.com/custimages/dd395-Jetpack-site.jpg)
Gotta love Dees, sure he's really into the batshit insane conspiracy theories, but the man has some mad photoshop skills.
This is why we need to merge the best/worst political cartoons because Dees has to be the best. Apart from which who is the shiny metal person in the global blood libel cartoon?
true also the cartoon neglects that 3 Israleis is far less then 100 palestineans
true also the cartoon neglects that 3 Israleis is far less then 100 palestineans
They try to get around it by saying:
"100 Palestinians were killed and 100s of rockets were fired into Israel".
That is why I don't know why the Palestinians just give up on the war approach. They can't win and in Israel's case worst comes to worse they can bomb all of Gaza.
What is it that the Union Bosses knocked out? Is it the constitution?
What is it that the Union Bosses knocked out? Is it the constitution?
It's Twinkie the Kid. Back when I was growing up in the 80s, Hostess had animated mascots that appeared in commercials for some of their products. Think the Keebler elves.
It would be more accurate if the cartoonist had relabeled "union bosses" as "Hostess management" since they took massive pay raises and ran their own company into the ground.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/483569_489952151025722_1355609275_n.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/J5DXQ.jpg)
WTF?? I don't even...
Pretty sure it's from an A. Wyatt Mann cartoon.
That jew face seems to be shopped from another picture and it is in a way different style than the rest of the picture. I think that either this is a poe (and he is using the face because it is such an iconic racist picture) or the picture apart from the face and texts was stolen from another artist and repurposed for this.
Uh since when do feminists say marriage is oppression in of itself and....oh right, right wing persecution complex
(http://swordattheready.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/obamanation1.jpg)
If something isn't part of my body than inside my private bits is exactly the last place I want it. Just saying.
You do realize that without France, we'd still be British, right?
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/530965_435184059881680_387809228_n.jpg)
Here's an excellent response:(click to show/hide)
I don't idiocy such as that deserves a polite response.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/530965_435184059881680_387809228_n.jpg)
Here's an excellent response:
Fuck no'd not just for the image, but for the venom-dripping, hate-filled response. Seriously, I think the asshole who replied went way, way to far in being a jerkass. The best part is that at the end is that he says "Your hatred scares me." Goddamn, that mirror's so shiny I fucking went blind.
Wow, you god damned horse blowing, jizz breathing, dick brained stacks of sacks of discharge from a rabid moose's yeast infected, gangrenous cunt, covered in shit and set ablaze have your heads lodged so entirely up your asses that your digestive acids have clearly dissolved your skulls and are nearly done destroying the pathetic fucking masses of cells that may have at one point borne some resemblance to a brain. Since I know that was all far too multi-syllabic for you, here's a translation into your native language of twatwitese: fuck you, you stupid cunts.
Yeah. I'm not defending the entirety of that response, but I'm simply saying stupid shit sometimes deserve aggressive responses (preferably without having to use 'cum guzzler' in any sentence)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/1101_424294500959820_458346079_n.jpg)Check out the cheekbones on broom-guy.
How come the one holding the sign doesn't have any feet? Or body other than head and arms, actually?
(http://redpillpatriot.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/5226124237_80a855cfcd.jpg)
Homosexuals have been suppressed by religion, therefore homosexuals are intolerant of religion? But Christians are not a threat to anybody?
To claim that "Coexist" is aimed at Christians is to implicitly say that Christians are the ones that cannot coexist with the rest.
Rapture Ready? The Blaze? tell me if I'm close.The site is more geared toward conservatism than fanatical Christianity (though it does contain elements of that). Closer to The Blaze than RR.
(http://redpillpatriot.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/5226124237_80a855cfcd.jpg)
Homosexuals have been suppressed by religion, therefore homosexuals are intolerant of religion? But Christians are not a threat to anybody?
Rapture Ready? The Blaze? tell me if I'm close.The site is more geared toward conservatism than fanatical Christianity (though it does contain elements of that). Closer to The Blaze than RR.
No.Rapture Ready? The Blaze? tell me if I'm close.The site is more geared toward conservatism than fanatical Christianity (though it does contain elements of that). Closer to The Blaze than RR.
World Net Daily? Drudge Report?
No.Rapture Ready? The Blaze? tell me if I'm close.The site is more geared toward conservatism than fanatical Christianity (though it does contain elements of that). Closer to The Blaze than RR.
World Net Daily? Drudge Report?
Winner :)No.Rapture Ready? The Blaze? tell me if I'm close.The site is more geared toward conservatism than fanatical Christianity (though it does contain elements of that). Closer to The Blaze than RR.
World Net Daily? Drudge Report?
Free Republic?
Found this gem on a conservative web site:
(http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/14461_522133084472803_703274634_n.jpg)
First person to guess correctly wins a Fuck Yeah.
If cartooning is fascism, conservatives are fascists.Not merely fascism, but rather the beginning of a full-blown genocide. Someone needs to tell these clowns that the saying "The pen is mightier than the sword" wasn't meant to be taken literally.
"For those of you who don't know, Nazi stands to National Socialist"
No it fucking doesn't you twerp.
Maybe he meant that the Freeper kind of butchered it. The full name is Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, or the National Socialist German Workers' Party."For those of you who don't know, Nazi stands to National Socialist"
No it fucking doesn't you twerp.
It actually does. Except the Nazis were socialists in the same way North Korea is a democratic republic. In other words, in name only.
Winner :)No.Rapture Ready? The Blaze? tell me if I'm close.The site is more geared toward conservatism than fanatical Christianity (though it does contain elements of that). Closer to The Blaze than RR.
World Net Daily? Drudge Report?
Free Republic?
The point being: Can anyone fucking tell the difference anymore?
(http://redpillpatriot.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/5226124237_80a855cfcd.jpg)The forgot to explain a symbol.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/3c376f7c03aceb90de877a00d6ee25f9/tumblr_meymt895pu1rd76dwo1_500.jpg)
This.(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
Because only one person can ever come up with a solution to a problem, and once that person dies, the solution is GONE FOREVER.
Remind me again why I used to believe this stuff?
This.(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
Because only one person can ever come up with a solution to a problem, and once that person dies, the solution is GONE FOREVER.
Remind me again why I used to believe this stuff?
Plus, how exactly does population control / family planning increase world hunger?
Not to mention, their definition of social problems is about 3,000 years out of date...
As for the cures for cancer and aids - well Jesus said you should rub yourself in oil and go to a TEMPLE and pray. I'll stick to modern medicine myself. Not to mention, why did God make those things so indiscriminate, arbitrary and hard to fight? It's almost as theotarded as Behe's wonderful irreduceably complex flaggellum, which not only is reduceably complex, but if you argue God especially designed it, why did he give it to the Ebola virus - not to mention, YTF did he design the Ebola virus in the first place? Nice going pal!
This.(http://hsccfv.com/prolife/abortion5.gif)
Because only one person can ever come up with a solution to a problem, and once that person dies, the solution is GONE FOREVER.
Remind me again why I used to believe this stuff?
Plus, how exactly does population control / family planning increase world hunger?
Not to mention, their definition of social problems is about 3,000 years out of date...
As for the cures for cancer and aids - well Jesus said you should rub yourself in oil and go to a TEMPLE and pray. I'll stick to modern medicine myself. Not to mention, why did God make those things so indiscriminate, arbitrary and hard to fight? It's almost as theotarded as Behe's wonderful irreduceably complex flaggellum, which not only is reduceably complex, but if you argue God especially designed it, why did he give it to the Ebola virus - not to mention, YTF did he design the Ebola virus in the first place? Nice going pal!
Plus, how exactly does population control / family planning increase world hunger?
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)
Funny, because I recall the founding fathers saying that they doubt the Constitution would even last more than a few decades before we had to remake it. IF anything, I'd say that implies their reactions would be "it took you over 200 years to do that?".
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)
Funny, because I recall the founding fathers saying that they doubt the Constitution would even last more than a few decades before we had to remake it. IF anything, I'd say that implies their reactions would be "it took you over 200 years to do that?".
The man in the bench looks so sad about picking up all that money.
This guy baffles me he's so talented and he could easily get a job doing art for commercial use
Kit, I'm aware who Norman Borlaug and Harold Shipman are. Are you aware that this is an entirely specious argument, the gist of which had been outlined by the poster I replied to? Please also note I said family planning. Two or three kids per family, not 12.Plus, how exactly does population control / family planning increase world hunger?
Because, in theory, you may have just aborted the next Norman Borlaug (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug). Then again, it is just as reasonable to guess you just aborted the next Harold Shipman. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Shipman)
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)
Funny, because I recall the founding fathers saying that they doubt the Constitution would even last more than a few decades before we had to remake it. IF anything, I'd say that implies their reactions would be "it took you over 200 years to do that?".
To the artist's credit, Obama's election does indicate something has changed about the Constitution since the Founding Fathers. He is half-black (which would have horrified the FF), and IIRC was elected without the support of white males (who were the ones the FF thought should vote).Only if the white males owned land.
It's an optical illusion
Seriously FDR never let anypony know about his polio
It's an optical illusion
Seriously FDR never let anypony know about his polio
Seriously? SERIOUSLY?
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)
Funny, because I recall the founding fathers saying that they doubt the Constitution would even last more than a few decades before we had to remake it. IF anything, I'd say that implies their reactions would be "it took you over 200 years to do that?".
The man in the bench looks so sad about picking up all that money.
I see three great presidents clapping him on in this picture.
Also, I think Kennedy and Bush are pointing at each other.
I see three great presidents clapping him on in this picture.
Also, I think Kennedy and Bush are pointing at each other.
Perhaps shit is going to go down.
I see three great presidents clapping him on in this picture.
Also, I think Kennedy and Bush are pointing at each other.
Perhaps shit is going to go down.
JFK would win. He pulled strings to get into WW2. That gives him balls on par with Captain America.
I see three great presidents clapping him on in this picture.
Also, I think Kennedy and Bush are pointing at each other.
Perhaps shit is going to go down.
JFK would win. He pulled strings to get into WW2. That gives him balls on par with Captain America.
Has it been definitively proven that JFK was not Captain America?
He also had his car greatly modified, so he'll be able to drive it by himself. It's on display at his estate, which is about a 10-15 minute drive from my house.
but seriously he took great pains for people to not notice being helped out of his car
(http://i.imgur.com/PycwX.jpg)I really shouldn't but:
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/s480x480/65184_550231195004434_443668957_n.jpg)
I see the gun cummers are out in full force, seriously?? I doubt it'll come to this.
Pfft, it isn't real hunting unless you're diving out of a tree armed only with a knife.
Pfft, it isn't real hunting unless you're diving out of a tree armed only with a knife.
Knife? Child, use nothin but your teeth! Like a real man!
Pfft, it isn't real hunting unless you're diving out of a tree armed only with a knife.
Knife? Child, use nothin but your teeth! Like a real man!
Bah! Back in my day, we didn't even have teeth to use, and we were thankful for it!
Pfft, it isn't real hunting unless you're diving out of a tree armed only with a knife.
Knife? Child, use nothin but your teeth! Like a real man!
Bah! Back in my day, we didn't even have teeth to use, and we were thankful for it!
I kill lesser creatures just by thinking. And greater creatures.
Wrestle a bear to death. There is nothing manlier*How about wrestling them into submission, teabagging them, and letting them go with directions to your house shaved into their fur with a dull razor (or just plucked if you have the time) in case they want to bring a few friends over for a re-match?
*And by manlier I mean "stupid, pointless, and macho-posturing nonsense... but still impressive"
I suplex bears on a regular basis
I suplex bears on a regular basis
Are you related to Sabin Figaro, Ibby?
I prefer to hunt by beating animals to death with my penis.
I prefer to hunt by beating animals to death with my penis.
Crow and Servo deserved betterI agree.
And oldie I never got round to posting:
(http://i.imgur.com/nxodq.jpg)
I also noticed it kind of somewhat implies that a dick is worth more than a vagina too.
But if the person making the dickish comment is drawn as a troll, is it supposed to be advocating sexism or merely being...well...dickish?The fact that the woman can't come up with an adequate response seems to indicate the former.
But if the person making the dickish comment is drawn as a troll, is it supposed to be advocating sexism or merely being...well...dickish?The fact that the woman can't come up with an adequate response seems to indicate the former.
That's what I got since it was the "Are you serious?" face.But if the person making the dickish comment is drawn as a troll, is it supposed to be advocating sexism or merely being...well...dickish?The fact that the woman can't come up with an adequate response seems to indicate the former.
Could be she's just angry at his response for being so rock fucking stupid by equating her vagina to a lock.
That's what I got since it was the "Are you serious?" face.But if the person making the dickish comment is drawn as a troll, is it supposed to be advocating sexism or merely being...well...dickish?The fact that the woman can't come up with an adequate response seems to indicate the former.
Could be she's just angry at his response for being so rock fucking stupid by equating her vagina to a lock.
The troll face shows a lack of seriousness though--even if you've heard that stupid argument before.That's what I got since it was the "Are you serious?" face.But if the person making the dickish comment is drawn as a troll, is it supposed to be advocating sexism or merely being...well...dickish?The fact that the woman can't come up with an adequate response seems to indicate the former.
Could be she's just angry at his response for being so rock fucking stupid by equating her vagina to a lock.
Yeah but then he uses the troll face.
I've actually heard people seriously use this "sluts are bad locks" argument before.
I've honestly never understood celebrity bashing. I mean, yes they are dumb, but everyone knows that.
I've honestly never understood celebrity bashing. I mean, yes they are dumb, but everyone knows that.
Same here, but I was focusing on the joking about domestic violence this time.
Nope. Here's the story behind it: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/lindsay-lohan-punched-choked-in-new-york-city-hotel-room-report-2012309
The only people I've ever heard use the whole "key and lock" argument are the same idiots who try to drag evolution into the matter by some how saying that "Being faithful and only with one man is beneficial to the girl, but it is beneficial to the guy to sleep around".
Of course, the idea is idiotic for several reasons, but that is what I've observed.
The only people I've ever heard use the whole "key and lock" argument are the same idiots who try to drag evolution into the matter by some how saying that "Being faithful and only with one man is beneficial to the girl, but it is beneficial to the guy to sleep around".
Of course, the idea is idiotic for several reasons, but that is what I've observed.
I've heard that argument with one man many women polygamy before. Basically they say one-man-many-wives polygamy is good because then you know who the father is, and you get a ton of babies, and they're healthier since the women are younger.
One-woman-one-man polygamy is bad because you don't know who the father is, and she gets "worn out".
(Is it really that hard to get a DNA test? Or plan out the breeding?)
Fucking disgusting.
These people think they're the happy, moral ones, but they view humans like cattle.
(http://inthereddest.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/green_eggs_and_obama.jpg)
The only people I've ever heard use the whole "key and lock" argument are the same idiots who try to drag evolution into the matter by some how saying that "Being faithful and only with one man is beneficial to the girl, but it is beneficial to the guy to sleep around".
Of course, the idea is idiotic for several reasons, but that is what I've observed.
I've heard that argument with one man many women polygamy before. Basically they say one-man-many-wives polygamy is good because then you know who the father is, and you get a ton of babies, and they're healthier since the women are younger.
One-woman-one-man polygamy is bad because you don't know who the father is, and she gets "worn out".
(Is it really that hard to get a DNA test? Or plan out the breeding?)
Fucking disgusting.
These people think they're the happy, moral ones, but they view humans like cattle.
I look at these people and think "Wouldn't it benefit the female to sleep around and prevent the males from figuring out who is the father? This would possibly keep multiple around which would give more resources to the child and her".
Out of curiosity, is this a valid view?
The only people I've ever heard use the whole "key and lock" argument are the same idiots who try to drag evolution into the matter by some how saying that "Being faithful and only with one man is beneficial to the girl, but it is beneficial to the guy to sleep around".
Of course, the idea is idiotic for several reasons, but that is what I've observed.
I've heard that argument with one man many women polygamy before. Basically they say one-man-many-wives polygamy is good because then you know who the father is, and you get a ton of babies, and they're healthier since the women are younger.
One-woman-one-man polygamy is bad because you don't know who the father is, and she gets "worn out".
(Is it really that hard to get a DNA test? Or plan out the breeding?)
Fucking disgusting.
These people think they're the happy, moral ones, but they view humans like cattle.
I look at these people and think "Wouldn't it benefit the female to sleep around and prevent the males from figuring out who is the father? This would possibly keep multiple around which would give more resources to the child and her".
Out of curiosity, is this a valid view?
The terms you were looking for are Polygyny and Polyandry. Polygyny is one man married to multiple women, Polyandry is one woman married to multiple men.
I look at these people and think "Wouldn't it benefit the female to sleep around and prevent the males from figuring out who is the father? This would possibly keep multiple around which would give more resources to the child and her".Depends heavily on social expectations. Speaking from personal experience she'd probably end up with only one surviving male around her(one way or another) in the circles I've known. More base cultures you'd even have the concerns of a male eliminating children to ensure his own recieve all of the resources.
Out of curiosity, is this a valid view?
I look at these people and think "Wouldn't it benefit the female to sleep around and prevent the males from figuring out who is the father? This would possibly keep multiple around which would give more resources to the child and her".Depends heavily on social expectations. Speaking from personal experience she'd probably end up with only one surviving male around her(one way or another) in the circles I've known. More base cultures you'd even have the concerns of a male eliminating children to ensure his own recieve all of the resources.
Out of curiosity, is this a valid view?
There's a chance of a few staying around a woman sleeping around, but I doubt it. Plus it hardly makes sense for a guy to sleep around when you take child support laws into account. Evolution flunked out of law school maybe. But these are people who think getting laid will do anything other than let them say they've gotten laid, so there's always bit of circumspect logic involved.
I look at these people and think "Wouldn't it benefit the female to sleep around and prevent the males from figuring out who is the father? This would possibly keep multiple around which would give more resources to the child and her".Depends heavily on social expectations. Speaking from personal experience she'd probably end up with only one surviving male around her(one way or another) in the circles I've known. More base cultures you'd even have the concerns of a male eliminating children to ensure his own recieve all of the resources.
Out of curiosity, is this a valid view?
I look at these people and think "Wouldn't it benefit the female to sleep around and prevent the males from figuring out who is the father? This would possibly keep multiple around which would give more resources to the child and her".Depends heavily on social expectations. Speaking from personal experience she'd probably end up with only one surviving male around her(one way or another) in the circles I've known. More base cultures you'd even have the concerns of a male eliminating children to ensure his own recieve all of the resources.
Out of curiosity, is this a valid view?
Not unknown for polygamy too, or in cases when their son is in line to inherit in some manner if one was to go back in time. May even occur if one mother dies, and the man remarries, they may try to murder the original heir so their heir will inherit. I mean, if the mother has decent control of the heir, they usually can control a puppet kingdom or something. And since they've already produced progeny, there's no reason they'll get married off.
(http://i.imgur.com/QgkI4.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/QgkI4.jpg)
Are you serious really no child support. Also in America man gets custody 50% of time
(http://i.imgur.com/QgkI4.jpg)
hold on I have it somewhere in my tumblr archive http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/more-fathers-getting-custody-in-divorce/Are you serious really no child support. Also in America man gets custody 50% of time
I'm gonna have to ask for a citation on the latter, because...that sounds like somethin pulled out of one's ass and polished up a teensy bit to seem reasonable.
Found this in about 10 seconds via Google. (http://www.attorneys.com/child-custody/why-do-women-win-most-custody-battles/) Dunno if the site's legit or not, but that makes a LOT more sense, given that America is a society where men are the "breadwinners," and are seen as hapless tits when it comes to anything involving children. Or cleaning. Or cooking. Or any housework, for that matter.
(http://i.imgur.com/QgkI4.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/7N5HJ.jpg)
"A pencil sharpener that can sharpen many pencils is a fine thing, but a pencil that has been through too many sharpeners is useless." :PThat is a beautiful comeback.
That's exactly my point. Men aren't the breadwinners any more, or they shouldn't be. So the trope is just bullshit.
(http://www.pixwik.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/specialstupid_zps65de240c.jpg)
(http://www.pixwik.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/specialstupid_zps65de240c.jpg)
Well it's true...
(http://www.pixwik.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/specialstupid_zps65de240c.jpg)
Well it's true...
You're right, It's true in a way, but criminals never obey any law for that matter, so why bother to make any laws. Now I'm not in favor of the assault weapon ban, I'd rather see us spend more time on the root of the problem, which is this culture that says the way to solve a problem is through shooting some place up, rather than getting some sort of help because it's seen as being "weak". Not to mention we have a country where our sense of community, and caring about others have been replaced with the "rugged individualist" myth. But sadly I haven't seen any pro-gun group endorsed this idea, because they're too busy pandering to the right wing in this country.
I'm ok with other types of gun control laws such as background checks, and whatnot. Because history has proven that bans don't work.
On the WSJ tax increase cartoon. I just can't get past the utter shite of people being upset over a couple grand going to the govt when people like that typically spend that much money on a single set of clothing, like a suit jacket, or even a super lux pair of designer shoes. I just have to say, after eating pasta for dinner about 20 times in a row, that "eat the rich, feed the poor" is not even a joke to me any more.
(http://www.pixwik.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/specialstupid_zps65de240c.jpg)
Well it's true...
Well it's true...
Again, an urban legend (http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fd20130106ja.html).(click to show/hide)
Well it's true...
Again, an urban legend (http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fd20130106ja.html).(click to show/hide)
The problem there is that the US is over 25 times as large as Japan as far as land area goes. There's just a lot more ground to cover even if such laws could be enacted.
@Commander Shepard Sorry I didn't mean for my response to come out as saying that was the point you were making. I was just adding onto the conversation.On the WSJ tax increase cartoon. I just can't get past the utter shite of people being upset over a couple grand going to the govt when people like that typically spend that much money on a single set of clothing, like a suit jacket, or even a super lux pair of designer shoes. I just have to say, after eating pasta for dinner about 20 times in a row, that "eat the rich, feed the poor" is not even a joke to me any more.
That has become my sister's motto, her and hubby make about $200,000 a year, in which she brings home most of the money. She is not only taxed on federal level, but is taxed by both the State of CT(where they live) and NY(where she works). Has spent some money on lux pairs of shoes, clothing, pocketbooks, and etc. and is still able to live quite comfortably, plus is more than willing to help out family members in need of assistance (you should see the dumb fights that she and my mother get into over how my mom is insistant on paying for stuff, when she's like"No, you keep the money, I'm paying for this"). She is baffled on how people don't want to pay their taxes, when they have more money than what she has.
Are you serious really no child support. Also in America man gets custody 50% of time
I'm gonna have to ask for a citation on the latter, because...that sounds like somethin pulled out of one's ass and polished up a teensy bit to seem reasonable.
....
Ahh Facebook. you never dissapoint...
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/394780_526096274078081_377371437_n.jpg)
Just so we are clear..
Signed into law the Mulford act
Supported a 15 day waiting period
Supported the Brady Bill
Ahh Facebook. you never dissapoint...
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/394780_526096274078081_377371437_n.jpg)
Ahh Facebook. you never dissapoint...
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/394780_526096274078081_377371437_n.jpg)
Just so we are clear..
Signed into law the Mulford act
Supported a 15 day waiting period
Supported the Brady Bill
See, the real irony? He was the one who, starting in California in the 60's, systematically dismantled mental health services in the US. Sure, there were plenty of abuses, but rather than address those, he tossed the mentally ill onto the street. And got shot by someone who would otherwise have been institutionalized.
Oh, I just read it wrong, in that Reagan was obsessed with a lesbian. lol :P
A better one might be
survived an assassination attempt
Still continued dismantling mental health care
This is worst for obvious reasons, keep fueling those racial fears folks.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/560831_412705418804159_1580844546_n.jpg)
Also Obama should be on Israel's side.
(http://i.imgur.com/oxIEtRT.gif)
(http://i.imgur.com/oxIEtRT.gif)
Actually I kind of agree with this... Not all soldiers are like that though.
(http://i.imgur.com/oxIEtRT.gif)
Actually I kind of agree with this... Not all soldiers are like that though.
My point exactly. This implies that all US soldiers are like that. In reality, only a tiny handful are.
Why does the 26 year old look like a 46 year old?
(http://i.imgur.com/L6d0KIN.gif)
(http://i.imgur.com/L6d0KIN.gif)
It's pointing out the double standard of dogs getting their claws trimmed while cats get their claws removed.
The cartoon sucks, but the point is valid. Declawing is horrible and unnecessary. I propose anyone who wants to have their cat declawed should have their fingers severed at the last joint to see what it feels like, because that's exactly what declawing is.
If your cat doesn't like having their claws trimmed, get a helper, wrap the cat up in a towel and trim away. Or get those soft claw caps. My vet charges like $10 + the cost of the caps to put them on.
(http://i.imgur.com/L6d0KIN.gif)
But the picture doesn't say "profile of a soldier", it says "profile of a suicide bomber".(http://i.imgur.com/oxIEtRT.gif)
Actually I kind of agree with this... Not all soldiers are like that though.
My point exactly. This implies that all US soldiers are like that. In reality, only a tiny handful are.
(http://i.imgur.com/L6d0KIN.gif)
His shirt is also drawn weird. In fact it looks like the whole comic is made from some powerpoint standard images or something like that. And since he couldn't find an alarmed kid wearing a shirt just like the one in the first picture he recoloured the shirt. Badly.
And since he is protesting against cruelty against animals why doesn't he care about neutering?
His shirt is also drawn weird. In fact it looks like the whole comic is made from some powerpoint standard images or something like that. And since he couldn't find an alarmed kid wearing a shirt just like the one in the first picture he recoloured the shirt. Badly.
And since he is protesting against cruelty against animals why doesn't he care about neutering?
It's pointing out the double standard of dogs getting their claws trimmed while cats get their claws removed.
The cartoon sucks, but the point is valid. Declawing is horrible and unnecessary. I propose anyone who wants to have their cat declawed should have their fingers severed at the last joint to see what it feels like, because that's exactly what declawing is.
If your cat doesn't like having their claws trimmed, get a helper, wrap the cat up in a towel and trim away. Or get those soft claw caps. My vet charges like $10 + the cost of the caps to put them on.
No, it's saying that declawing a cat is the same as trimming a dog's claws. It's not saying declawing is bad, it's saying it's not bad.
No, it's saying that declawing a cat is the same as trimming a dog's claws. It's not saying declawing is bad, it's saying it's not bad.
No, it's saying that declawing a cat is the same as trimming a dog's claws. It's not saying declawing is bad, it's saying it's not bad.
How did you get that from the comic?
Notice how the kid reacts to declawing? The comic is pointing out that most people [citation needed] CONSIDER declawing to be no worse than trimming.
No, it's saying that declawing a cat is the same as trimming a dog's claws. It's not saying declawing is bad, it's saying it's not bad.
How did you get that from the comic?
Notice how the kid reacts to declawing? The comic is pointing out that most people [citation needed] CONSIDER declawing to be no worse than trimming.
That's what I took from it too. I saw the comic as against declawing.
No, it's saying that declawing a cat is the same as trimming a dog's claws. It's not saying declawing is bad, it's saying it's not bad.
How did you get that from the comic?
Notice how the kid reacts to declawing? The comic is pointing out that most people [citation needed] CONSIDER declawing to be no worse than trimming.
That's what I took from it too. I saw the comic as against declawing.
I'd say the fact that nobody can agree on what it means cements this cartoon's place here.
No, it's saying that declawing a cat is the same as trimming a dog's claws. It's not saying declawing is bad, it's saying it's not bad.
How did you get that from the comic?
Notice how the kid reacts to declawing? The comic is pointing out that most people [citation needed] CONSIDER declawing to be no worse than trimming.
That's what I took from it too. I saw the comic as against declawing.
For the record, I'm not sure how I view neutering. I do believe it to be necessary because of overpopulation issues with some animals, but at the same time, I'd hate it if some superior being took away my balls just because he didn't want me to create hellspawn with them.
So I guess I view it in "necessary evil" territory. I'm kind of a hippie.
The nice thing about birds is that if they ever get pregnant, you can just make an omelet.
The nice thing about birds is that if they ever get pregnant, you can just make an omelet.
And for some birds, they don't even need to be pregnant for you to have an omelet.
Chicken is the only fowl that comes to mind though.
For the record, I'm not sure how I view neutering. I do believe it to be necessary because of overpopulation issues with some animals, but at the same time, I'd hate it if some superior being took away my balls just because he didn't want me to create hellspawn with them.
So I guess I view it in "necessary evil" territory. I'm kind of a hippie.
That's my take on it to, plus having unaltered animal is a lot of work. I get this newsletter thingy in the mail every month, and one this months topics is whether or not to get your dog altered, and if so when. It's written by a breeder who goes on to talk about the challenges an intact dog may pose. Also if you're like for them to keep their "balls" you can get a vasectomy done on the males, for dogs, at least.
(http://i.imgur.com/qcg4s3E.jpg)
This came out after Obama's first election. That's when they stopped being so subtle.(http://i.imgur.com/qcg4s3E.jpg)
...Wow. They're not even trying to hide the racism now, are they?
I don't know the cartoonist did follow it up with one in this last election cycle which showed Mitt Romney riding down a fleeing Barack Obama on a horse (ala klansman propaganda)
See, I always thought that that particular cartoon was more "poorly thought through" than "overtly racist". There had been a "rampaging chimp eats a lady's face and gets shot by the cops" story a week or two before the stimulus hoopla and the cartoonist defended himself by reminding everyone that it is Congress, not the President, that writes bills. Undoubtedly it is poorly thought outand full of unfortunate implications, but the cartoon would have made sense no matter who was President.
It is from 2009 and caused a bit of a fuss, see from huffington post article - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/18/new-york-post-chimp-carto_n_167841.html (http://ttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/18/new-york-post-chimp-carto_n_167841.html)Ask and ye shall receive:
There was a great response showing a shot Klansmen with the caption - "Guess we'll need a knew NY Post political cartoonist."
But I can't find it.
See, I always thought that that particular cartoon was more "poorly thought through" than "overtly racist". There had been a "rampaging chimp eats a lady's face and gets shot by the cops" story a week or two before the stimulus hoopla and the cartoonist defended himself by reminding everyone that it is Congress, not the President, that writes bills. Undoubtedly it is poorly thought outand full of unfortunate implications, but the cartoon would have made sense no matter who was President.Yeah, I didn't see the chimp as a stand-in for Obama, but rather Congress. So basically the joke was that the stimulus package must have been created by a...well, rabid chimp.
(http://i.imgur.com/t6TQzNv.jpg)
How can you tell? It's just a single celled organism.(http://i.imgur.com/t6TQzNv.jpg)
K why the fuck does it have a unibrow
You can tell from the Golgi Apparatus. Clear indicator of unibrow development.Every time you say something I picture it being said by a well-dressed muffin.
(http://i.imgur.com/t6TQzNv.jpg)
That is not irony.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/385214_473500232697228_1361592295_n.png)
I'm like 90% sure that the whole point of the Cold War was that we didn't really use guns in it. And the two major wars we fought during it, Korea and Vietnam, didn't exactly end in a total victory for us.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/be3c00a1e8366d7e132d9a9916a6fbe9/tumblr_micbv4jycx1s3jlowo1_500.jpg)
It's a lot harder to kill people with a fire extinguisher than it is with a gun.Well, you could use the extinguisher as a bludgeon, however difficult that would be.
Even harder to do it accidentally.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/be3c00a1e8366d7e132d9a9916a6fbe9/tumblr_micbv4jycx1s3jlowo1_500.jpg)How dare you trivialize war! DIAF, and take your stupidity with you.
But don't you know, abortion is the ultimate evil, because we can't have women have a say in what to do with their own bodies.(http://25.media.tumblr.com/be3c00a1e8366d7e132d9a9916a6fbe9/tumblr_micbv4jycx1s3jlowo1_500.jpg)How dare you trivialize war! DIAF, and take your stupidity with you.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/be3c00a1e8366d7e132d9a9916a6fbe9/tumblr_micbv4jycx1s3jlowo1_500.jpg)There is so much stupid in this image, it burns.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/be3c00a1e8366d7e132d9a9916a6fbe9/tumblr_micbv4jycx1s3jlowo1_500.jpg)God that's fascinating how their mind "works"...
Fascism views direct action, including political violence and war, as a means to achieve national rejuvenation, spirit and vitality.
They argue that nations and races must purge themselves of socially and biologically weak or degenerate people, while simultaneously promoting the creation of strong people, in order to survive in a world defined by perpetual national and racial conflict.
To appeal to Italian conservatives, Fascism adopted policies such as promoting family values, including promotion policies designed to reduce the number of women in the workforce limiting the woman's role to that of a mother. The fascists banned literature on birth control and increased penalties for abortion in 1926, declaring both crimes against the state.
...
Italian Fascism pursued what it called "moral hygiene" of youth, particularly regarding sexuality.[194] Fascist Italy promoted what it considered normal sexual behaviour in youth while denouncing what it considered deviant sexual behaviour.[194] It condemned pornography, most forms of birth control and contraceptive devices (with the exception of the condom), homosexuality, and prostitution as deviant sexual behaviour, although enforcement of laws opposed to such practices was erratic and authorities often turned a blind eye.[194] Fascist Italy regarded the promotion of male sexual excitation before puberty as the cause of criminality amongst male youth.[194] Fascist Italy declared homosexuality to be a social disease.[194] Fascist Italy pursued an aggressive campaign to reduce prostitution of young women.[194]
Mussolini perceived women's primary role to be childbearers, while men were warriors, once saying, "war is to man what maternity is to the woman".[195] In an effort to increase birthrates, the Italian Fascist government gave financial incentives to women who raised large families, and initiated policies designed to reduce the number of women employed.[196] Italian Fascism called for women to be honoured as "reproducers of the nation", and the Italian Fascist government held ritual ceremonies to honour women's role within the Italian nation.[197] In 1934, Mussolini declared that employment of women was a "major aspect of the thorny problem of unemployment" and that for women, working was "incompatible with childbearing". Mussolini went on to say that the solution to unemployment for men was the "exodus of women from the work force".[198]
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/be3c00a1e8366d7e132d9a9916a6fbe9/tumblr_micbv4jycx1s3jlowo1_500.jpg)
Remind me again how many people died in war? How many people were murdered when the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Or do they not matter because they're dirty Japs? I mean, I don't believe in trivializing abortion, but I'm pretty sure this bullshit is trivializing the horrors of war.
We killed the British Empire in 1781? Really now, I coulda sworn we just defeated them. Why isn't the United Kingdom flying an American flag then? There are still British people.... unless Doctor Who's been lying to me.
(http://i.imgur.com/JuMEvpt.jpg)
These people don't understand how species work, do they?
(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mesvfuaQzt1r3k34d.gif)(http://i.imgur.com/JuMEvpt.jpg)
So tragic, isn't it??
I think he meant "Skeksis", those ugly fellers from that muppet movie what didn't have Gonzo or the Jewish one. Y'know, the one what wears a hat.These people don't understand how species work, do they?
Speck...ies? You mean them...glassy lensy things what you look out'er to make yer eyes see better cause God done birthed you with bad eyes cause yous a terrible hellbound sinner and a nerd so its aight if I beat the fuckery outta you?
Yeah, I seen 'em before.
I think that is an attempt at pants like this:Big boner and a badonkadonk.
(http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRsW03A_Iyo90naa7HgELH8mu-Bk300xxobAU4YHti6fdh-9mXnaQ)
But now that you mentioned it, I can't unsee it.
....why is Jesus, Mary, and Joseph all white?
I think he meant "Skeksis", those ugly fellers from that muppet movie what didn't have Gonzo or the Jewish one. Y'know, the one what wears a hat.These people don't understand how species work, do they?
Speck...ies? You mean them...glassy lensy things what you look out'er to make yer eyes see better cause God done birthed you with bad eyes cause yous a terrible hellbound sinner and a nerd so its aight if I beat the fuckery outta you?
Yeah, I seen 'em before.I think that is an attempt at pants like this:Big boner and a badonkadonk.
(http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRsW03A_Iyo90naa7HgELH8mu-Bk300xxobAU4YHti6fdh-9mXnaQ)
But now that you mentioned it, I can't unsee it.
(http://i.imgur.com/JuMEvpt.jpg)
So tragic, isn't it??
(http://i.imgur.com/JuMEvpt.jpg)
....why is Jesus, Mary, and Joseph all white?
....why is Jesus, Mary, and Joseph all white?
why is the sheep blue?
I still don't get how these people think wanting to cut down on corporate excess is anti-capitalist.
I still don't get how these people think wanting to cut down on corporate excess is anti-capitalist.
I use Key Bank :)
They are pretty good consumer wise
I still don't get how these people think wanting to cut down on corporate excess is anti-capitalist.
-snip-Are they really trying to equate "moving into a bad neighborhood" with "going to a party"? That if a woman goes to a party, everyone there is going to be an untrustworthy stranger, she should keep herself hidden, and be ever vigilant for potential rapists? Basically, "If you go to a party, don't socialize or have any fun, because if something bad happens, it'll be your fault."
Victim blaming combined with the "irrational woman" stereotype. Wonderful.
Victim blaming combined with the "irrational woman" stereotype. Wonderful.
I got a question concerning rape : Is clothing one factor that influences a rapists decision to rape?Nope. It's a popular excuse rapists use in an attempt to absolve themselves of responsibility once they're accused, but it is very rarely a legitimate deciding factor. The deciding factor is always whether or not the man feels he's entitled to sex. If he feels entitled to sex, he will come up with ANY excuse to justify his actions, whether it be her clothing, her attitude, the way she looked at him, the fact that he brought her a drink, the fact that she was too drunk to say "no", the fact that she was alone, the fact that she wore makeup... anything. Even if you're not dressed "like a whore", they will just find some other reason to tell themselves that they're entitled to sex with you.
I got a question concerning rape : Is clothing one factor that influences a rapists decision to rape?Nope. It's a popular excuse rapists use in an attempt to absolve themselves of responsibility once they're accused, but it is very rarely a legitimate deciding factor. The deciding factor is always whether or not the man feels he's entitled to sex. If he feels entitled to sex, he will come up with ANY excuse to justify his actions, whether it be her clothing, her attitude, the way she looked at him, the fact that he brought her a drink, the fact that she was too drunk to say "no", the fact that she was alone, the fact that she wore makeup... anything. Even if you're not dressed "like a whore", they will just find some other reason to tell themselves that they're entitled to sex with you.
Basically, telling women to cover up because their clothing causes them to get raped is like telling children to stop keeping dogs as pets because the dogs keep eating their homework.
I got a question concerning rape : Is clothing one factor that influences a rapists decision to rape?Nope. It's a popular excuse rapists use in an attempt to absolve themselves of responsibility once they're accused, but it is very rarely a legitimate deciding factor. The deciding factor is always whether or not the man feels he's entitled to sex. If he feels entitled to sex, he will come up with ANY excuse to justify his actions, whether it be her clothing, her attitude, the way she looked at him, the fact that he brought her a drink, the fact that she was too drunk to say "no", the fact that she was alone, the fact that she wore makeup... anything. Even if you're not dressed "like a whore", they will just find some other reason to tell themselves that they're entitled to sex with you.
Basically, telling women to cover up because their clothing causes them to get raped is like telling children to stop keeping dogs as pets because the dogs keep eating their homework.
Honestly sometimes I don't really blame those rad-fem people. With how prevalent the idea of men not being able to control themselves, if you support women's rights, but also believe that men are uncontrollable, then it makes sense that you would want them all castrated or eliminated.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
What's with the period-worship among radfems? Is it because it's the one specifically feminine trait that can't be artificially recreated? They could worship breasts or vaginas and their various component parts, but these days you can get some good surgery that produces all of that very well without the person actually genetically being female. Whereas I don't think there's a surgery or anything that will make a post-op MtF transsexual menstruate or even give an appearance of doing so.
Still. period-worship is creeeeeeeepy. I'm glad I don't get one anymore.
I don't know why a trans person would even want one... I wish I didn't have them.
What's with the period-worship among radfems? Is it because it's the one specifically feminine trait that can't be artificially recreated? They could worship breasts or vaginas and their various component parts, but these days you can get some good surgery that produces all of that very well without the person actually genetically being female. Whereas I don't think there's a surgery or anything that will make a post-op MtF transsexual menstruate or even give an appearance of doing so.
Still. period-worship is creeeeeeeepy. I'm glad I don't get one anymore.
I don't know why a trans person would even want one... I wish I didn't have them.
What's with the period-worship among radfems? Is it because it's the one specifically feminine trait that can't be artificially recreated? They could worship breasts or vaginas and their various component parts, but these days you can get some good surgery that produces all of that very well without the person actually genetically being female. Whereas I don't think there's a surgery or anything that will make a post-op MtF transsexual menstruate or even give an appearance of doing so.
Still. period-worship is creeeeeeeepy. I'm glad I don't get one anymore.
I don't know why a trans person would even want one... I wish I didn't have them.
I can understand why a transwoman would want it, actually. It would make them feel more 'complete'. It can't be easy being so thoroughly aesthetically female and yet having this one deficit that nobody else could see or notice but that YOU know is missing and there's nothing you or all of science can do to 'fix' it. It'd be this one permanently unfixed part of themselves and it can't be easy to live with.
My guess is that attitude would last about as long as it takes for said person to have one actual period.
I don't know why a trans person would even want one... I wish I didn't have them.
Because periods mean - among other things - the ability to reproduce and some transwomen would rather like to have that option?
I don't know why a trans person would even want one... I wish I didn't have them.
Because periods mean - among other things - the ability to reproduce and some transwomen would rather like to have that option?
Kit, you hit the nail perfectly on the head! Without even being trans either. Good job, +1.
It's also the fact that not having one makes us feel like the "odd girl out" which is just a reminder of how we weren't born female, which is a rather upsetting thing to remember. Not being born female just plays on the insecurities we already have with regards to dating & beauty culture.
I understand how you feel, but please understand this isn't something you can just argue and expect people to agree with you. I'd love more than anything to have children of my own, and sadly, that's not an option. I would happily swap bodies with any of you if it meant having that opportunity. It really is one of the most back-handed things to tell a transwoman in that it reminds us of not being cis and that it acts as though we somehow "lucked out."
When I was a teenager I used to get crippling cramps for days at a time. Now I just have bleeding so bad I get anemia
Being of a NeoPagan stripe, I confess that periods don't bother me and I've learned to love, honor and accept them. That said, when I was younger, I used to have severe cramps that kept me bedridden & barfing a lot. However, my body now can have a period with no problems. I also think there's a psychosomatic component. If one changes their thinking about periods (like I did) it does ease the pain a tad. That's not to say one shouldn't get valid medical treatment for PMDD, of course. Mine just kinda went away with time.
Now, all I have to contend with is some bloating & irritability, I can remedy this with some nice teas.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
I don't know why a trans person would even want one... I wish I didn't have them.
Because periods mean - among other things - the ability to reproduce and some transwomen would rather like to have that option?
since we seem to be not putting up new cartoons ot mock..
... from a conservative friend on face book.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/529775_421296974628719_336003326_n.jpg)
Think about it....
Two fake cowboys working for their own benefit and personal glory.
And a Community Organizer helping someone else and trying to make things over all a little better.
Maybe it's me but that some think this makes the top two guys look good and the third look bad says more about a certain mind set then it does about the guys in the pictures.
since we seem to be not putting up new cartoons ot mock..
... from a conservative friend on face book.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/529775_421296974628719_336003326_n.jpg)
Think about it....
Two fake cowboys working for their own benefit and personal glory.
And a Community Organizer helping someone else and trying to make things over all a little better.
Maybe it's me but that some think this makes the top two guys look good and the third look bad says more about a certain mind set then it does about the guys in the pictures.
I think I'll re-edit this to say the opposite of the intended message....making it a "Best Political Cartoon".
since we seem to be not putting up new cartoons ot mock..
... from a conservative friend on face book.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/529775_421296974628719_336003326_n.jpg)
Think about it....
Two fake cowboys working for their own benefit and personal glory.
And a Community Organizer helping someone else and trying to make things over all a little better.
Maybe it's me but that some think this makes the top two guys look good and the third look bad says more about a certain mind set then it does about the guys in the pictures.
I think I'll re-edit this to say the opposite of the intended message....making it a "Best Political Cartoon".
Why should you need to re-edit it? The intended message, to me, depends on the political views of the one showing you the image.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
Sounds a lot like Rockbitch.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
Sounds a lot like Rockbitch.
I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
Sounds a lot like Rockbitch.
I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
Wha......?
You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
Sounds a lot like Rockbitch.
I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
Wha......?
That was pretty much my reaction.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
Yeah, I'd noticed that none of the conspiracy nutjobs ever try to say that Gargarin's flight into orbit was fake. Probably none of them are batshit insane enough to want to piss off the Russians.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
Yeah, I'd noticed that none of the conspiracy nutjobs ever try to say that Gargarin's flight into orbit was fake. Probably none of them are batshit insane enough to want to piss off the Russians.
In their defense, those theories that I've seen agree that people have been sent to the orbit and that ISS is real etc. They simply refuse to believe that people would have been able to reach the moon with the technology of that time.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
Yeah, I'd noticed that none of the conspiracy nutjobs ever try to say that Gargarin's flight into orbit was fake. Probably none of them are batshit insane enough to want to piss off the Russians.
In their defense, those theories that I've seen agree that people have been sent to the orbit and that ISS is real etc. They simply refuse to believe that people would have been able to reach the moon with the technology of that time.
I hate that shit so much. I was an eight year old kid, and I stared up at the moon right after watching Armstrong's first lunar walk in July 1969, and I saw the glint of sunlight reflected off of the command vehicle as it orbited the moon. It is still a clear and awesome memory - it made me shiver with excitement, wonderment, and pride.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
Yeah, I'd noticed that none of the conspiracy nutjobs ever try to say that Gargarin's flight into orbit was fake. Probably none of them are batshit insane enough to want to piss off the Russians.
In their defense, those theories that I've seen agree that people have been sent to the orbit and that ISS is real etc. They simply refuse to believe that people would have been able to reach the moon with the technology of that time.
I hate that shit so much. I was an eight year old kid, and I stared up at the moon right after watching Armstrong's first lunar walk in July 1969, and I saw the glint of sunlight reflected off of the command vehicle as it orbited the moon. It is still a clear and awesome memory - it made me shiver with excitement, wonderment, and pride.
I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
Worst part is, that isn't the first time I've heard that.
,,,,
That said, just for the heckuvit, I made this. I won't let it go to waste...
(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/Much-Used%20FSTDT%20Stock%20Images/529775_421296974628719_336003326_n_zps2d2cd2a9.jpg)
*in Joel Hodgson voice* Waddaya think, siiiirrrs?
I'd be bound to ask just how straight people spread it, and regardless of what they responded with I'd insist that the alliance of evil straight doctors for repercussions for gay sex all drew straws and the guy who got the short one had to "Take one for the team".I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
Worst part is, that isn't the first time I've heard that.
So where does he think the other STD's came from?I imagine that, like moon landing and other conspiracy theorists, he was focused solely on the one thing he had a theory on and ignored the similar events that potentially contradicted it.
Yeah, I'd noticed that none of the conspiracy nutjobs ever try to say that Gargarin's flight into orbit was fake. Probably none of them are batshit insane enough to want to piss off the Russians.
In their defense, those theories that I've seen agree that people have been sent to the orbit and that ISS is real etc. They simply refuse to believe that people would have been able to reach the moon with the technology of that time.
I hate that shit so much. I was an eight year old kid, and I stared up at the moon right after watching Armstrong's first lunar walk in July 1969, and I saw the glint of sunlight reflected off of the command vehicle as it orbited the moon. It is still a clear and awesome memory - it made me shiver with excitement, wonderment, and pride.
When I was younger, I used to believe in the moon landing conspiracy theory :-[
I think part of the problem is the documentaries they show. The ones about the moon landings are put together quite well and they
seem to have a lot of scientific evidence. Also the experts on them don't act like complete weirdos, and appear to have valid credentials.
I'd be bound to ask just how straight people spread it, and regardless of what they responded with I'd insist that the alliance of evil straight doctors for repercussions for gay sex all drew straws and the guy who got the short one had to "Take one for the team".I did know a gay guy who thought straight people invented AIDS because they were jealous of how gay people could have sex without consequences like pregnancy.
Worst part is, that isn't the first time I've heard that.
,,,,
That said, just for the heckuvit, I made this. I won't let it go to waste...
(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/Much-Used%20FSTDT%20Stock%20Images/529775_421296974628719_336003326_n_zps2d2cd2a9.jpg)
*in Joel Hodgson voice* Waddaya think, siiiirrrs?
stealing this, if that's ok.
....
"No stars are visible in any of the lunar surface footage". Why? Because they were on the daylight face of the moon, and lunar soil is reflective - those old video cameras were glared out by the surface refraction, hence no stars.....
Being of a NeoPagan stripe, I confess that periods don't bother me and I've learned to love, honor and accept them. That said, when I was younger, I used to have severe cramps that kept me bedridden & barfing a lot. However, my body now can have a period with no problems. I also think there's a psychosomatic component. If one changes their thinking about periods (like I did) it does ease the pain a tad. That's not to say one shouldn't get valid medical treatment for PMDD, of course. Mine just kinda went away with time.
Now, all I have to contend with is some bloating & irritability, I can remedy this with some nice teas.
Being of a NeoPagan stripe, I confess that periods don't bother me and I've learned to love, honor and accept them. That said, when I was younger, I used to have severe cramps that kept me bedridden & barfing a lot. However, my body now can have a period with no problems. I also think there's a psychosomatic component. If one changes their thinking about periods (like I did) it does ease the pain a tad. That's not to say one shouldn't get valid medical treatment for PMDD, of course. Mine just kinda went away with time.
Now, all I have to contend with is some bloating & irritability, I can remedy this with some nice teas.
Honestly, I didn't get really nasty cramps and the like until AFTER I went Pagan and developed a healthy respect for my period. So...that doesn't always work.
(http://i.imgur.com/YAB3ZuD.jpg)
Great Obama is a Socialist and saying Chavez was an evil dictator.
(http://i.imgur.com/YAB3ZuD.jpg)
Great Obama is a Socialist and saying Chavez was an evil dictator.
Is he both a socialist and a muslim?
Ah wait, the people who find that cartoon funny probably think it's the same thing.....
Not a cartoon, but ladies and gentlemen and raptors of FSTDT, I give you this short film by Helen Ukpabio's cult.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUeKBibBN0I
Remember that this is the same woman who thinks that children who misbehave, cry in the night, or show symptoms of malaria are actually witches working for Satan that must be "delivered" through dangerous exorcisms, forced to face witch trials, or expelled from their communities.
No one is asking you to give up your culture. What is having a sign in Spanish at your Wal Mart too damn much for you cocksuckers'Murica.
I actually MST'd it to preserve my sanity.Not a cartoon, but ladies and gentlemen and raptors of FSTDT, I give you this short film by Helen Ukpabio's cult.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUeKBibBN0I
Remember that this is the same woman who thinks that children who misbehave, cry in the night, or show symptoms of malaria are actually witches working for Satan that must be "delivered" through dangerous exorcisms, forced to face witch trials, or expelled from their communities.
The fuck did I just watch?
Honestly did Dogma make thatNo one is asking you to give up your culture. What is having a sign in Spanish at your Wal Mart too damn much for you cocksuckers'Murica.
I take it he's now our board's running joke?Honestly did Dogma make thatNo one is asking you to give up your culture. What is having a sign in Spanish at your Wal Mart too damn much for you cocksuckers'Murica.
Well, since those dipshits Brendan Rizzo, Large Ham, and Headache have left...Large Ham left?
And for those of you with longer memories, Skyfire and AboveAthletics...And for those of us with shorter memories, cestlefun17, LightHorseman and TigerHunter.
Not a cartoon, but ladies and gentlemen and raptors of FSTDT, I give you this short film by Helen Ukpabio's cult.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUeKBibBN0I
Remember that this is the same woman who thinks that children who misbehave, cry in the night, or show symptoms of malaria are actually witches working for Satan that must be "delivered" through dangerous exorcisms, forced to face witch trials, or expelled from their communities.
The fuck did I just watch?
"He killed him by shoving him onto grass? Seriously?"
It's Nigeria. The grass is probably made of fucking cobra venom or something.It worked in Clones of Bruce Lee.
Well, since those dipshits Brendan Rizzo, Large Ham, and Headache have left...Large Ham left?And for those of you with longer memories, Skyfire and AboveAthletics...And for those of us with shorter memories, cestlefun17, LightHorseman and TigerHunter.
This should jog your memory. (http://forums.fstdt.net/index.php?topic=2891.0)Well, since those dipshits Brendan Rizzo, Large Ham, and Headache have left...Large Ham left?And for those of you with longer memories, Skyfire and AboveAthletics...And for those of us with shorter memories, cestlefun17, LightHorseman and TigerHunter.
Wow, we have had a few, haven't we? Why not throw in Mabus for good measure :D
Although I don't remember TigerHunter... :(
Are they the fuckers posting that copypasta on every Youtube video they can?Yup. They're following the orders of this assclown (http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=93107).
Hey isn't that a Clay Bennett cartoon? Bennett doesn't do that kind of message.Oh it's absolutely a shop, no question about it. I also recognized that particular cartoon style.
Also judging by shirt it looks like the cartoon was altered.
Hey isn't that a Clay Bennett cartoon? Bennett doesn't do that kind of message.Oh it's absolutely a shop, no question about it. I also recognized that particular cartoon style.
Also judging by shirt it looks like the cartoon was altered.
That's such a badass abomination of nature.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/528452_603955422967012_17479923_n.jpg)Hollywood genetics, anyone?
Not a fan of Monsanto, but come on this is just stupid.
Aren't crocoduck-esque jokes overplayed yet?(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/528452_603955422967012_17479923_n.jpg)Hollywood genetics, anyone?
Not a fan of Monsanto, but come on this is just stupid.
Aren't crocoduck-esque jokes overplayed yet?(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/528452_603955422967012_17479923_n.jpg)Hollywood genetics, anyone?
Not a fan of Monsanto, but come on this is just stupid.
...Seriously? After I just said in another thread......um, is it the stupidity of those images or did I do something wrong?
*sighs* I give up.
Did this work?
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lxbqVMvcGnI/T7kBOEpUklI/AAAAAAAAwrM/NcIgE5gqt2I/s1600/120520-liberal-logic-40.jpg)
Hey I know! Let's completely forget the ideological inversion that took place in the 1960s!
Did this work?
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lxbqVMvcGnI/T7kBOEpUklI/AAAAAAAAwrM/NcIgE5gqt2I/s1600/120520-liberal-logic-40.jpg)
Awesome. Here's moar:
(http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003570455/liber-102855125335_xlarge.jpeg)
So like I was saying...what about Rand Paul and the Civil Rights Act (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1an3ds7_uE)?
(http://www.rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/liberal-logic-101-337-300x249.jpg)
Let's play a game of naming everything that's wrong with this image:
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j338/Americasforum/Liberal%20Logic%20101/liberal-logic-101-4.jpg)
Let's play a game of naming everything that's wrong with this image:
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j338/Americasforum/Liberal%20Logic%20101/liberal-logic-101-4.jpg)
I like how they made the gun pink. Obviously a good conservative woman wouldn't be seen dead with some ugly man gun.It's a real gun too, btw. Kinda like the series of pink power tools for women. Cause you know, your power drill's gotta match your purse after all.
I like how they made the gun pink. Obviously a good conservative woman wouldn't be seen dead with some ugly man gun.
I like how they made the gun pink. Obviously a good conservative woman wouldn't be seen dead with some ugly man gun.It's a real gun too, btw. Kinda like the series of pink power tools for women. Cause you know, your power drill's gotta match your purse after all.
Obscure factoid - there is a new fad amongst welders and construction workers in general to apply pink or flowery vinyl skins to their welding masks and tool bodies to discourage "borrowing" and "disappearing" of their tools. They even beg stickers from their little daughters (MLP, Rainbow Brite, Hello Kitty).
It's a big fun joke, and it works; the fuckin' idiots who would pilfer a tool are too stupid and insecure in their manhood to steal "girly"/"faggot" tools. Plus, the colors and patterns make it easier to locate a tool visually in a messy job site or work shop than even safety orange or yellow or lime green :)
(http://i.imgur.com/9gLARr5.jpg)
I like how they made the gun pink. Obviously a good conservative woman wouldn't be seen dead with some ugly man gun.
A fairy that that grants wishes defending peoples rights... I fail to see why that's a bad thing.
For the last hugging time....PINK WAS A BOY'S COLOR BECAUSE OF IT'S ASSOCIATION WITH RED WHILE BLUE WAS A GIRL'S COLOR!Dude, you missed your verbal tic at the end of your statement.
For the last hugging time....PINK WAS A BOY'S COLOR BECAUSE OF IT'S ASSOCIATION WITH RED WHILE BLUE WAS A GIRL'S COLOR!
Furious liberal friday is major bullshit seriously look at it today*looks & facepalms*
(http://www.catholicculture.org/Images/cartoons_editorial/supreme-court-gay-marriage-detail.jpg)
(http://www.catholicculture.org/Images/cartoons_editorial/supreme-court-gay-marriage-detail.jpg)
Except it's a fetus that's in a woman's body, and most marriages aren't christian anyways.
(http://www.catholicculture.org/Images/cartoons_editorial/supreme-court-gay-marriage-detail.jpg)
Except it's a fetus that's in a woman's body, and most marriages aren't christian anyways.
Next thing you know they'll wanna vote...(http://www.catholicculture.org/Images/cartoons_editorial/supreme-court-gay-marriage-detail.jpg)
Except it's a fetus that's in a woman's body, and most marriages aren't christian anyways.
The day a woman thinks to instruct men about facts....
For the last hugging time....PINK WAS A BOY'S COLOR BECAUSE OF IT'S ASSOCIATION WITH RED WHILE BLUE WAS A GIRL'S COLOR!
(http://i.imgur.com/9gLARr5.jpg)I painted my speedglas OD green and and black with "Warning: does not play well with others" written on the side. Everybody leaves it alone. ;D
GODWIN!Not only that, but they're comparing Bush to Hitler. The guy was a bad president, sure, but he wasn't evil.
(http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/images/issue-7/counterthink.jpg)
Well Godwin pretty much covered that. And I agree, as much of a war criminal as Bush was, he was not, in fact, Hitler.GODWIN!Not only that, but they're comparing Bush to Hitler. The guy was a bad president, sure, but he wasn't evil.
(http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/images/issue-7/counterthink.jpg)
This is like what would happen if Bill Maher and Heather Cushman-Dowdee (of Hathor the Cow Goddess fame) married and had a child, and that child became a comic artist.Right before the apocalypse, that is.
Well Godwin pretty much covered that. And I agree, as much of a war criminal as Bush was, he was not, in fact, Hitler.GODWIN!Not only that, but they're comparing Bush to Hitler. The guy was a bad president, sure, but he wasn't evil.
(http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/images/issue-7/counterthink.jpg)
No, Mike Adams is just dumber than a bag of sand, that's all.Well Godwin pretty much covered that. And I agree, as much of a war criminal as Bush was, he was not, in fact, Hitler.GODWIN!Not only that, but they're comparing Bush to Hitler. The guy was a bad president, sure, but he wasn't evil.
(http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/images/issue-7/counterthink.jpg)
Also, I don't understand what they're referring to. Did the FDA try to ban vitamins or something?
(http://i46.tinypic.com/95petd.jpg)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/95petd.jpg)
Because it's the Democratic Party who keeps going on about how the Confederacy were totally right.
Personally I think the Rush Limbaugh one is one of the dumbest, most offensive political cartoons I've ever seen. Yep, the treatment of Rush is the same as the treatment of those girls who were denied access to a public school in Little Rock. Brilliant.
(http://i36.tinypic.com/b3twd0.jpg)
Actually in the realm of its own stupidity it doesn't even make sense. The National Guard helped that girl get into school, so the artist labels on the Guardsmen means that...Rush Limbaugh was assisted by "True Racism", the "Lib Media" and the "NFL"?
The NFL part came when the Rams wouldn't sell to himActually in the realm of its own stupidity it doesn't even make sense. The National Guard helped that girl get into school, so the artist labels on the Guardsmen means that...Rush Limbaugh was assisted by "True Racism", the "Lib Media" and the "NFL"?
I don't know about the "liberal" media or the NFL, but he's definitely assisted by racism. He spouts so much dog whistle racism the white supremacists probably think they're at obedience school.
And they wouldn't sell to him because he's a racist windbag.The NFL part came when the Rams wouldn't sell to himActually in the realm of its own stupidity it doesn't even make sense. The National Guard helped that girl get into school, so the artist labels on the Guardsmen means that...Rush Limbaugh was assisted by "True Racism", the "Lib Media" and the "NFL"?
I don't know about the "liberal" media or the NFL, but he's definitely assisted by racism. He spouts so much dog whistle racism the white supremacists probably think they're at obedience school.
Ruby Bridges
Ruby Bridges Hall (born Ruby Nell Bridges September 8, 1954, in Tylertown, Mississippi) moved with her parents to New Orleans, Louisiana at the age of 4. In 1960, when she was 6 years old, her parents responded to a call from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and volunteered her to participate in the integration of the New Orleans School system. She is known as the first African-American child to attend an all-white elementary school in the South. She attended William Frantz Elementary School at 3811 N Galvez St, New Orleans, LA 70117.
Basically this. I think even the Rams saw the problems of having a racist lead a mostly black team.I remember one of the more common jokes at the time was that Rush Limbaugh had always wanted to own a group of black people.
Also by Allah I bet he's a birther
(http://joehistorian.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/let-them-eat-cake-obama.jpg)
What?I'm guessing he's saying that only white people are smart enough to evacuate before a hurricane.
I'm missing something, I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. Can someone give an explanation?
Quote(http://joehistorian.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/let-them-eat-cake-obama.jpg)
That dress is kinda cool ::)
I'm amazed that "gypsie"-bashing is still in vogue. I could've sworn the Jews would still be the number one target.
I'm amazed that "gypsie"-bashing is still in vogue. I could've sworn the Jews would still be the number one target.
I guess that varies between regions or something. In Finland at least I have not really seen much anti-semitism. Well apart from neo-nazies but that comes with the rest of their baggage. Suspicion for gypsies/roma is way more common.
We just don't have a history of anti-semitism in Finland, I don't think we have ever had any problems with our jewish population. For the roma on the other hand there is a long history of stereotyping them as thieves and lazy scoundrels.
I was pondering if I should add this, but I do think that sometimes that stereotype is accurate. The problem is that any roma who do fit that negative stereotype used to get into news (untill it was decided that if a roma has been involved in a crime the news story must not be allowed to say that the suspect is roma. Instead they use something like "a person wearing a national costume" which is arguably worse.) and most people have anecdotal stories about the roma doing something criminal. Any law abiding, decent roma on the other hand is "below the radar" so to speak which means that the negative stereotype gets way more air time.
Snip
I have more, with a couple concerning the poor, persecuted Rush. Behold the stupidity:
(http://i50.tinypic.com/2rqhjdh.gif)
(http://i50.tinypic.com/34yzi1y.jpg)
(http://i48.tinypic.com/2eqcmtk.png)
Here, have a shitty webcomic as compensation:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/601174_118251358365955_786886761_n.jpg)
What the heck are those things? Talking Sonichu-Hetalia Poke-balls?
What the heck are those things? Talking Sonichu-Hetalia Poke-balls?
Countryball comics are quite common. They all have that horrible art style and they play with stereotypes and often are intentionally bad jokes.
Some are funny and others are just dumb. sometime with actual racism sometimes without.
Maybe it makes more sense to Europeans.What the heck are those things? Talking Sonichu-Hetalia Poke-balls?
Countryball comics are quite common. They all have that horrible art style and they play with stereotypes and often are intentionally bad jokes.
Some are funny and others are just dumb. sometime with actual racism sometimes without.
Ah...I see...still looks ridiculous.
Fun fact, on another forum, I got moderated for saying "jipped."
It was done completely passive-aggressively with a little note at the bottom of my post saying that my post was edited for a racial epithet. The moderator was someone who I was arguing with on an unrelated matter (and I was being an idiot in that argument, but what else is new?).
It took me awhile to figure out what was removed from my post (because I don't necessarily memorize every post I make -- what a shock) but when I found out I was confused at first, until I figured it out.
I didn't know that the original spelling of the word was "gypped", for instance.
...My point is that it's annoying that a racial epithet like that has managed to enter common lingo to the point where it isn't even recognized as one anymore (imagine "nigger" being used today without any knowledge that it was a racial epithet towards black people) but at the same time, I don't like that the moderator I was arguing with, instead of taking the time to educate me on the matter, instead changed my post without informing me of what I had done wrong, and added a note at the bottom, which would make people think I had intentionally said something racist.
It's safe to say that I hope to never be like that moderator.
By the way, I like gypsies. A lot :D
Fun fact, on another forum, I got moderated for saying "jipped."
It was done completely passive-aggressively with a little note at the bottom of my post saying that my post was edited for a racial epithet. The moderator was someone who I was arguing with on an unrelated matter (and I was being an idiot in that argument, but what else is new?).
It took me awhile to figure out what was removed from my post (because I don't necessarily memorize every post I make -- what a shock) but when I found out I was confused at first, until I figured it out.
I didn't know that the original spelling of the word was "gypped", for instance.
...My point is that it's annoying that a racial epithet like that has managed to enter common lingo to the point where it isn't even recognized as one anymore (imagine "nigger" being used today without any knowledge that it was a racial epithet towards black people) but at the same time, I don't like that the moderator I was arguing with, instead of taking the time to educate me on the matter, instead changed my post without informing me of what I had done wrong, and added a note at the bottom, which would make people think I had intentionally said something racist.
It's safe to say that I hope to never be like that moderator.
By the way, I like gypsies. A lot :D
I've heard "Picnic" is a racist word. It's short for "Pick-a-n*g", since in the old days lynching black people while eating lunch in the park was like the best hobby ever.
Fun fact, on another forum, I got moderated for saying "jipped."
It was done completely passive-aggressively with a little note at the bottom of my post saying that my post was edited for a racial epithet. The moderator was someone who I was arguing with on an unrelated matter (and I was being an idiot in that argument, but what else is new?).
It took me awhile to figure out what was removed from my post (because I don't necessarily memorize every post I make -- what a shock) but when I found out I was confused at first, until I figured it out.
I didn't know that the original spelling of the word was "gypped", for instance.
...My point is that it's annoying that a racial epithet like that has managed to enter common lingo to the point where it isn't even recognized as one anymore (imagine "nigger" being used today without any knowledge that it was a racial epithet towards black people) but at the same time, I don't like that the moderator I was arguing with, instead of taking the time to educate me on the matter, instead changed my post without informing me of what I had done wrong, and added a note at the bottom, which would make people think I had intentionally said something racist.
It's safe to say that I hope to never be like that moderator.
By the way, I like gypsies. A lot :D
I've heard "Picnic" is a racist word. It's short for "Pick-a-n*g", since in the old days lynching black people while eating lunch in the park was like the best hobby ever.
Which is actually false. It's a misspelling of a French word (pique-nique).
Fun fact, on another forum, I got moderated for saying "jipped."
It was done completely passive-aggressively with a little note at the bottom of my post saying that my post was edited for a racial epithet. The moderator was someone who I was arguing with on an unrelated matter (and I was being an idiot in that argument, but what else is new?).
It took me awhile to figure out what was removed from my post (because I don't necessarily memorize every post I make -- what a shock) but when I found out I was confused at first, until I figured it out.
I didn't know that the original spelling of the word was "gypped", for instance.
...My point is that it's annoying that a racial epithet like that has managed to enter common lingo to the point where it isn't even recognized as one anymore (imagine "nigger" being used today without any knowledge that it was a racial epithet towards black people) but at the same time, I don't like that the moderator I was arguing with, instead of taking the time to educate me on the matter, instead changed my post without informing me of what I had done wrong, and added a note at the bottom, which would make people think I had intentionally said something racist.
It's safe to say that I hope to never be like that moderator.
By the way, I like gypsies. A lot :D
I've heard "Picnic" is a racist word. It's short for "Pick-a-n*g", since in the old days lynching black people while eating lunch in the park was like the best hobby ever.
Which is actually false. It's a misspelling of a French word (pique-nique).
Well... I guess that's kind of a relief, since now I don't need to lynch someone to have a proper picnic.
Fun fact, on another forum, I got moderated for saying "jipped."
It was done completely passive-aggressively with a little note at the bottom of my post saying that my post was edited for a racial epithet. The moderator was someone who I was arguing with on an unrelated matter (and I was being an idiot in that argument, but what else is new?).
It took me awhile to figure out what was removed from my post (because I don't necessarily memorize every post I make -- what a shock) but when I found out I was confused at first, until I figured it out.
I didn't know that the original spelling of the word was "gypped", for instance.
...My point is that it's annoying that a racial epithet like that has managed to enter common lingo to the point where it isn't even recognized as one anymore (imagine "nigger" being used today without any knowledge that it was a racial epithet towards black people) but at the same time, I don't like that the moderator I was arguing with, instead of taking the time to educate me on the matter, instead changed my post without informing me of what I had done wrong, and added a note at the bottom, which would make people think I had intentionally said something racist.
It's safe to say that I hope to never be like that moderator.
By the way, I like gypsies. A lot :D
I've heard "Picnic" is a racist word. It's short for "Pick-a-n*g", since in the old days lynching black people while eating lunch in the park was like the best hobby ever.
Which is actually false. It's a misspelling of a French word (pique-nique).
Well... I guess that's kind of a relief, since now I don't need to lynch someone to have a proper picnic.
No, but youdo need a wasp or bee flying around, sand in the sandwiches, a flask of scalding hot tea and wet grass.
And an argument. It's not a proper picnic without an argument.
Definitely fire ants.
And if you have a family, a wailing child.
No, but very similar. Fire ants have black heads, but red bodies, and they're so named because being bitten by even one feels like you're being burned with an open flame.
I remember one time a fire ant crawled right up my pants leg to my crotch and waited until it was firmly settled on my scrotum before biting.
No, but very similar. Fire ants have black heads, but red bodies, and they're so named because being bitten by even one feels like you're being burned with an open flame.
I remember one time a fire ant crawled right up my pants leg to my crotch and waited until it was firmly settled on my scrotum before biting.
No, but very similar. Fire ants have black heads, but red bodies, and they're so named because being bitten by even one feels like you're being burned with an open flame.
I remember one time a fire ant crawled right up my pants leg to my crotch and waited until it was firmly settled on my scrotum before biting.
Speaking of scary red bugs, does anyone know what those weird huge fuzzy ants are? They look like an ant, but a half an inch long. They're black and have neon red fur on them. I'm terrified of them. I'm not sure what they do.
Speaking of scary red bugs, does anyone know what those weird huge fuzzy ants are? They look like an ant, but a half an inch long. They're black and have neon red fur on them. I'm terrified of them. I'm not sure what they do.
Would you be referring to these (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutillidae)?
No, but very similar. Fire ants have black heads, but red bodies, and they're so named because being bitten by even one feels like you're being burned with an open flame.
I remember one time a fire ant crawled right up my pants leg to my crotch and waited until it was firmly settled on my scrotum before biting.
Geez, and I thought it was bad when I was visiting relatives in SC and one of them crawled up my ankle and got me on the back of the calf. That was 30 years ago and I still remember that bite. You have my utmost sympathy.
(http://i.imgur.com/UZH5v.gif)
(http://i.imgur.com/UZH5v.gif)
I'm pretty sure almost every country does that if not dare I say all the countries in the world offer that am I not correct?
(http://i.imgur.com/UZH5v.gif)
I'm pretty sure almost every country does that if not dare I say all the countries in the world offer that am I not correct?
Spoiler'd and linked because the picture is very graphic.This is one of the benefits of deactivating my FB account for a semester. I have to put up with fewer idiots this way.
I just deleted yet ANOTHER person off my friends list on Facebook because they posted THIS bullshit on their feed.
Spoiler'd and linked because the picture is very graphic.
I just deleted yet ANOTHER person off my friends list on Facebook because they posted THIS bullshit on their feed.(click to show/hide)
1- They have pressure on the wound to keep him from bleeding out. You don't just move a severely injured person without stabilizing them first numbnutz!
2- I dunno, he looks like he's in shock to me. And steal a wheelchair? Have you ever been to a marthon? Especially in one as big as the Boston Marathon there's multiple spare wheelchairs all over in case of people fainting or heat stroke and so forth.
3- Um, no. He's not. It's a guy who lives 2 towns over from me fuckface.
As a Bostonian and someone who knows people effected by this horrible incident, please go fornicate with rusty hot iron poker.
My dad is on Facebook claiming that the media censored out blood and gore from later broadcasts to cover up the truth that it was fake.
Her father hides gold in house plants, I really don't think he uses his noggin about other things.
My dad is on Facebook claiming that the media censored out blood and gore from later broadcasts to cover up the truth that it was fake.I wish I could clone my late father and send him with all his wisdom, warmth and courage to mentor people with dads like that...my heart aches at the thought of how many young folks have fools, even if they are lovable, for parents :-\
No its Janeane garofalo,Who?
No its Janeane garofalo,Who?
Her father hides gold in house plants, I really don't think he uses his noggin about other things.Her dad is Ron Paul?
Exactly.No its Janeane garofalo,Who?
Torture isn't being beheaded; that would be murder:
(http://lordcrimson.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/torturefordummies.jpg?w=700)
Her father hides gold in house plants, I really don't think he uses his noggin about other things.Her dad is Ron Paul?
Torture isn't being beheaded; that would be murder:
(http://lordcrimson.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/torturefordummies.jpg?w=700)
Torture isn't being beheaded; that would be murder:
(http://lordcrimson.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/torturefordummies.jpg?w=700)
Also, why is it necessary to torture a guy when he's holding the requested information right there in his hand?
This cartoon is about three levels beyond "not thought through".
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/8339215349fdf618135d76813b05c648/tumblr_ml7vjobQrt1r53swio1_500.jpg)
...what?
No its Janeane garofalo,Who?
Mid-90's stand up comedian, actress, and former radio show host who is crazy liberal. Almost to the point of being annoying to people who generally agree with her.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/8339215349fdf618135d76813b05c648/tumblr_ml7vjobQrt1r53swio1_500.jpg)
...what?
Torture isn't being beheaded; that would be murder:
(http://lordcrimson.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/torturefordummies.jpg?w=700)
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/17286_630755166939140_1599702034_n.jpg)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Elementary_School_shooting_(San_Diego)
(http://i.imgur.com/U7HnDiS.jpg)
Wake up, sheeple!
(http://i.imgur.com/esODW09.jpg)The NRA sandblasted the background checks? Mother of god...
No, they just sandblasted a big 'S' that looks unrelated to the other two words. Also they used a non-Euclidean sandblaster which fired the sand out at a different angle to the nozzle :oNah, the tube is just bent inside the cover. The cover is clearly some novelty-gun-barrel thingy, it has NRA on the side so I guess this comic is saying that the products that NRA endorses are faulty and aren't "shooting straight."
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/17286_630755166939140_1599702034_n.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/U7HnDiS.jpg)
Wake up, sheeple!
Uhhhh, can you explain what's bad about this one? The sheep represent congress, who are being lead/scared away from gun safety legislation by the NRA. That...that doesn't seem like an unreasonable view.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/17286_630755166939140_1599702034_n.jpg)
Torture isn't being beheaded; that would be murder:
(http://lordcrimson.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/torturefordummies.jpg?w=700)
This is true. Waterboarding just makes your body think it's slowly dying. Unlike a beheading which is generally quick.
I mean except for the times that waterboarding did kill the person.
(http://i.imgur.com/ijL2OaF.jpg)
Good idea, atrocious execution :(
So is the pain of being shot and bleeding to death but that still only counts as a murder charge.Torture isn't being beheaded; that would be murder:
(http://lordcrimson.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/torturefordummies.jpg?w=700)
This is true. Waterboarding just makes your body think it's slowly dying. Unlike a beheading which is generally quick.
I mean except for the times that waterboarding did kill the person.
It is murder, but what if it's a slow sawing of the head? I'd say that's pretty damned torturous.
(http://i.imgur.com/ijL2OaF.jpg)
Good idea, atrocious execution :(
I'm gonna have nightmares.
(http://i.imgur.com/gtbRMmG.jpg)
Spuki, edit button. Please.
Spuki, edit button. Please.
This.
Also when you're editing a post or using the standard Reply function instead of the Quick Reply, you can scroll down to previous posts and click "insert quote" to quote those posts, too.
....Is that Obama, or a uterus?I read this comment and think that it must be a joke. I mean there can't really be an image where those two things could get mixed up.
....Is that Obama, or a uterus?Yeah I mean there's caricatures...and there's that.
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/earth-r.jpg/)Jesus was a Jew. So were Joseph, Mary, and all the apostles. Besides, Jesus had to die.
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/17432730.jpg)
Wait is that an actual Nazi Gay Parade? (That one view of the street looks photoshopped)
Or is it someone calling Gays Nazis?
Wait is that an actual Nazi Gay Parade? (That one view of the street looks photoshopped)
Or is it someone calling Gays Nazis?
I have no idea
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/earth-r.jpg/)Jesus was a Jew. So were Joseph, Mary, and all the apostles. Besides, Jesus had to die.
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/17432730.jpg)
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/download-htm.jpg)
Wait is that an actual Nazi Gay Parade? (That one view of the street looks photoshopped)
Or is it someone calling Gays Nazis?
I have no idea
Once a year busloads of Nazis from all over Scandinavia arrive at the little town of Lund, Sweden. They come to march in honour of [Charles XII], who is buried there. Despite people['s] disgust and negative media coverage, the Nazi community is still growing. To annoy the Nazi marchers the town was covered with banners and posters for a fake “Nazi Gay Parade”.
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/earth-r.jpg/)Jesus was a Jew. So were Joseph, Mary, and all the apostles. Besides, Jesus had to die.
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/17432730.jpg)
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/17432730.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/601754_10200440929318555_2102280641_n.jpg)
I can't even count the number of things wrong with that statement.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/601754_10200440929318555_2102280641_n.jpg)
I can't even count the number of things wrong with that statement.
I call Poe on this one. I've heard people claim waterboarding wasn't torture, but I've never met anyone crazy enough for the "baptize with freedom" bs. Just sounds like satire to me.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/601754_10200440929318555_2102280641_n.jpg)
I can't even count the number of things wrong with that statement.
I call Poe on this one. I've heard people claim waterboarding wasn't torture, but I've never met anyone crazy enough for the "baptize with freedom" bs. Just sounds like satire to me.
Oh, this is definitely satire. The "American Eagle" meme is used to make fun of rabid American-centric attitudes like that one.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/8ec8aa60faf824729892d5e432cbb268/tumblr_mlzb4t8CIK1rmtaomo1_500.png)
I keep seeing this one on Tumblr.
*facepalm* I feel stupid now.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/601754_10200440929318555_2102280641_n.jpg)
I can't even count the number of things wrong with that statement.
I call Poe on this one. I've heard people claim waterboarding wasn't torture, but I've never met anyone crazy enough for the "baptize with freedom" bs. Just sounds like satire to me.
I agree about the Poe-ishness of the eagle one, there.(http://24.media.tumblr.com/8ec8aa60faf824729892d5e432cbb268/tumblr_mlzb4t8CIK1rmtaomo1_500.png)
I keep seeing this one on Tumblr.
This one, on the other hand is a douchecanoe ride down the 1969 Cuyahoga River!
(http://firstlightforum.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/17432730.jpg)
Could have sworn there were some Italians involved there some how.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/601754_10200440929318555_2102280641_n.jpg)
I can't even count the number of things wrong with that statement.
I call Poe on this one. I've heard people claim waterboarding wasn't torture, but I've never met anyone crazy enough for the "baptize with freedom" bs. Just sounds like satire to me.
I dunno. Someone who's proud to be a conservadouche on my FB shared this.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/8ec8aa60faf824729892d5e432cbb268/tumblr_mlzb4t8CIK1rmtaomo1_500.png)
I keep seeing this one on Tumblr.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/8ec8aa60faf824729892d5e432cbb268/tumblr_mlzb4t8CIK1rmtaomo1_500.png)
I keep seeing this one on Tumblr.
I don't agree with it at all, but I thought it was pretty funny.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/601754_10200440929318555_2102280641_n.jpg)That one is done completely in jest. It's one of those "America, Fuck Yeah" memes. Actually I love these, they're hilarious. I need to find more.
I can't even count the number of things wrong with that statement.
(http://i.imgur.com/vPAEIxB.jpg)And this cartoonist was given a nice, fat check from the Heritage Foundation. See, I can do that too.
That one is done completely in jest. It's one of those "America, Fuck Yeah" memes. Actually I love these, they're hilarious. I need to find more.
I take it that was one of the gag entries. :PThat one is done completely in jest. It's one of those "America, Fuck Yeah" memes. Actually I love these, they're hilarious. I need to find more.
Try this (http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-50-ae-j) on for size.
I take it that was one of the gag entries. :PThat one is done completely in jest. It's one of those "America, Fuck Yeah" memes. Actually I love these, they're hilarious. I need to find more.
Try this (http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-50-ae-j) on for size.
Yeah I actually stumbled onto that site rather recently so I didn't know.I take it that was one of the gag entries. :PThat one is done completely in jest. It's one of those "America, Fuck Yeah" memes. Actually I love these, they're hilarious. I need to find more.
Try this (http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-50-ae-j) on for size.
Yes, all joke SCPs can be identified by the "-J" suffix to their names.
Oh good, more neo-Luddite bullshit. Have fun without vaccines, microwave ovens, Wi-Fi and artificial sweeteners. I'll be over here enjoying life.(click to show/hide)
I'll admit, the microwave ovens are a new one. :P
Which has as even less facts and science behind it as the anti-vaccination claims, if such thing is possible.I'll admit, the microwave ovens are a new one. :P
Not really. It never grew to the proportions that anti-vaccers and cell-phone paranoiacs have, but there's always been a small, dedicated amount of people claiming that microwaves embedded food with dangerous levels of radiation.
Which has as even less facts and science behind it as the anti-vaccination claims, if such thing is possible.I'll admit, the microwave ovens are a new one. :P
Not really. It never grew to the proportions that anti-vaccers and cell-phone paranoiacs have, but there's always been a small, dedicated amount of people claiming that microwaves embedded food with dangerous levels of radiation.
In an unrelated note, microwaves give me a headache. Really, if I stand too close to a microwave that is on it gives me physical pain, this has been true ever since my family got our first microwave. (Although I think it was worse back when I was a kid.)
I'll admit, the microwave ovens are a new one. :P
Not really. It never grew to the proportions that anti-vaccers and cell-phone paranoiacs have, but there's always been a small, dedicated amount of people claiming that microwaves embedded food with dangerous levels of radiation.
The radiowaves from the microwave are probably the cause, in either case it's only if I stand too close while the device is on. The problem with my... problem is that when I try to search the web to see if anyone else experiences... The results don't seem very reliable.
Yahoo answers has someone claim that medical science proven it to be possible. And that microwaves give you brain cancer if you are less than 2 meters from one.
Some "consumer safety" site says that it is impossible for a microwave to give me a headache because regulations require them to be safe and that the headache is probably from the additives in my food... So the additives in the food that I have not eaten yet give me some sort of pre-emptive headache? Time traveling additives?
And then I found this site:
http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=journal&action=view&type=journal&id=134
Which is just some tinfoil hat material.
Bah.
Anyway, back to comics:
(http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/041613.jpg)
Uh, huh.
(http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/041713.jpg)
Wait what?
(http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/042313.jpg)
Ok... Few days after the Boston bombings he is already using it in his comic just so he can preach more of his political beliefs. That's low. Now I wonder how the characters got arrested, I'll just go back a few days further...
(http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/040713.jpg)
...I'm not suprised he is supporting an armed revolution but what is it with these people who have a hardon for shooting at cops?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/940871_467353243342546_1253323597_n.png)
Funny how the artist forgot to include the occupants of all those other "chairs." No, Israel is the only land that isn't empty in the Middle East.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/940871_467353243342546_1253323597_n.png)
Funny how the artist forgot to include the occupants of all those other "chairs." No, Israel is the only land that isn't empty in the Middle East.
I think it's more about how there are so many Arab nations that they don't need any more territory, which is a common pro-Israeli sentiment.
Tim Tebow, the guy who starred in an ad from the gay-bashing Focus on the Family and almost spoke at the church of Pastor Robert Jeffress (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/14/tim-tebow-church-anti-gay-first-baptist-dallas_n_2687167.html). (Don't worry, he may come back (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/tebow-cancels-appearance-robert-jeffress-church) to that church once this blows over.)
Not sure since Wilders said Palestineans should move to Jordan and to start calling Jordan Palestine
Wait a minute... couldn't this be easily turned around to say that jews also have been scattered all over the world and therefore didn't need their own country either? Certainly Jews have more power outside israel then palestinians seem to have anywhere.
When a pro israeli cartoon can be easily turned into an anti-semitic one, it might be a bad argument.
...
(http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/042313.jpg)
Ok... Few days after the Boston bombings he is already using it in his comic just so he can preach more of his political beliefs. That's low. Now I wonder how the characters got arrested, I'll just go back a few days further...
....
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/42a8d0d35992253b1e320ef3808d7301/tumblr_mm2u8ftG2l1s14aeuo1_500.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/42a8d0d35992253b1e320ef3808d7301/tumblr_mm2u8ftG2l1s14aeuo1_500.jpg)
Please tell me how any other politician, this also applies to those on the right, isn't that same way....
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Billy the Heretic (http://www.billytheheretic.com/), possibly the worst political webcomic of all time.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/42a8d0d35992253b1e320ef3808d7301/tumblr_mm2u8ftG2l1s14aeuo1_500.jpg)The only "dark side" the creator of this is afraid of concerns skin tone I'm sure...
Please tell me how any other politician, this also applies to those on the right, isn't that same way....
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/42a8d0d35992253b1e320ef3808d7301/tumblr_mm2u8ftG2l1s14aeuo1_500.jpg)The only "dark side" the creator of this is afraid of concerns skin tone I'm sure...
Please tell me how any other politician, this also applies to those on the right, isn't that same way....
Re: microwaves:
I'm sure they can be dangerous but I doubt they could hurt anyone in the quantities you find in a household model. My parents had the same microwave since before I was born (they got rid of it shortly before I moved away a few years ago) that was so worn out that every time it was used it LEAKED RADIATION INTO THE HOUSE SUFFICIENT ENOUGH TO CUT OFF EVERY WIRELESS SIGNAL IN IT. Wi-fi, radios, cell phones, cordless phones, even walkie-talkies. If that microwave was going, you couldn't use a single one of those on the ground floor if not the entire house. Sometimes you could in the concrete-lined basement, but for the most part the microwave killed all the wireless signals. I lived with that microwave for twenty years and, as you can probably tell, I am not dead and also I'm pretty sure I don't have cancer or extra eyes or limbs.
I still can't imagine it was especially healthy, though. Just sayin'.
Yeah but I really wanted to make a "dark side" joke.(http://24.media.tumblr.com/42a8d0d35992253b1e320ef3808d7301/tumblr_mm2u8ftG2l1s14aeuo1_500.jpg)The only "dark side" the creator of this is afraid of concerns skin tone I'm sure...
Please tell me how any other politician, this also applies to those on the right, isn't that same way....
Actually, I think stupidity is pretty color-blind for most Tea Partiers.
(http://i.imgur.com/BCO3gI7.jpg)
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Billy the Heretic (http://www.billytheheretic.com/), possibly the worst political webcomic of all time.
^ I usually travel on stilts while showing off my banana hammock.Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Billy the Heretic (http://www.billytheheretic.com/), possibly the worst political webcomic of all time.
This one in particular is unintentionally hilarious and shitty, just like the rest:
(http://www.billytheheretic.com/pages/images/gaypride.jpg)
...Synthetic adulterants? Did they run out of scary sounding things and decide to mash up the words "adultery" "Synthetic" and "propellants"?An adulterant is a substance that contaminates some other substance (in this context, typically food or water). It's the standard "they are putting evil mind control chemicals in our food" paranoia.
...Synthetic adulterants? Did they run out of scary sounding things and decide to mash up the words "adultery" "Synthetic" and "propellants"?An adulterant is a substance that contaminates some other substance (in this context, typically food or water). It's the standard "they are putting evil mind control chemicals in our food" paranoia.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/940871_467353243342546_1253323597_n.png)
I'd quite like to own Belgium based on land claims in my holy book. The Anglo-Saxons shouldn't mind, they have the rest of Europe, after all. I'm not happy to live with any of the smelly locals though. I guess the French will have to find the Belgians somewhere to live.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/940871_467353243342546_1253323597_n.png)
I'd quite like to own Belgium based on land claims in my holy book. The Anglo-Saxons shouldn't mind, they have the rest of Europe, after all. I'm not happy to live with any of the smelly locals though. I guess the French will have to find the Belgians somewhere to live.
(http://i.imgur.com/JiPdRsv.jpg)
Believe me, there's plenty more where that came from.(http://i.imgur.com/JiPdRsv.jpg)
I think we've found a new guy to put on the Encyclopedia of American Loons.
Yeah, this guy is a pretty notorious anti-Semitic cartoonist and conspiracy theorist who blames everything on EBIL JOOISH CONSPEERIZZY and stuff. He also draws Jewish people all the time just like that drawing on the right, with the big noses and greedy-hand-wringing. Just another conspiracy nut who's essentially a self-parody.Who is "this guy"?
(http://i.imgur.com/JiPdRsv.jpg)You'd think that after all these years, at least one of the countries with legal same-sex marriage would've actually gone down the slippery slope they keep announcing. It's been like a quarter of a century already.
It says 'Steve Greenberg' at the top left corner, but I don't think that's the guy's name. I can't think of his name but I recognize the caricature of the Jewish guy.A. Wyatt Mann.
(http://i.imgur.com/6oP5brC.jpg)
Did he seriously use "Misogynist" as a verb?You mean "adjective", right newbie?
Not a cartoon, but ladies and gentlemen and raptors of FSTDT, I give you this short film by Helen Ukpabio's cult.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUeKBibBN0I
Remember that this is the same woman who thinks that children who misbehave, cry in the night, or show symptoms of malaria are actually witches working for Satan that must be "delivered" through dangerous exorcisms, forced to face witch trials, or expelled from their communities.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/f85ceb654b873da3a7b14478f2ed4815/tumblr_mm8yuqXtAe1r5fed2o1_500.jpg)
I feel that, after "pedophilia", "bestiality" and "necrophilia", this person's imagination ran out of slippery slope with which to label the extra stairs, poor dear.(click to show/hide)
Just a wee bit racist(http://24.media.tumblr.com/f85ceb654b873da3a7b14478f2ed4815/tumblr_mm8yuqXtAe1r5fed2o1_500.jpg)
I don't understand... wait... oooooooh.
Someone would be losing their mind if that "doll" was holding a Bible and an assault rifle instead.
Someone would be losing their mind if that "doll" was holding a Bible and an assault rifle instead.
Someone would be losing their mind if that "doll" was holding a Bible and an assault rifle instead.
They'd REALLY lose their shit if it was a Quran and bomb vest.
Just a wee bit racist(http://24.media.tumblr.com/f85ceb654b873da3a7b14478f2ed4815/tumblr_mm8yuqXtAe1r5fed2o1_500.jpg)
I don't understand... wait... oooooooh.
I think I found a gold mine of crazy and awful cartoons.Could you link to them, please?
Check out the Flickr account named SS & SS. Their first names appear to be sandi and Steve.
Warning: Don't check them out if you get enraged by ignorance and fanatical bile because these guys make Glenn Beck and Michelle Malkin look sane and intellectual.
I think I found a gold mine of crazy and awful cartoons.Could you link to them, please?
Check out the Flickr account named SS & SS. Their first names appear to be sandi and Steve.
Warning: Don't check them out if you get enraged by ignorance and fanatical bile because these guys make Glenn Beck and Michelle Malkin look sane and intellectual.
...That is literally the worst rage comic I have ever read.That is saying something
I can't help thinking it's supposed to be satire.
I can't help thinking it's supposed to be satire.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/940871_467353243342546_1253323597_n.png)
I'd quite like to own Belgium based on land claims in my holy book. The Anglo-Saxons shouldn't mind, they have the rest of Europe, after all. I'm not happy to live with any of the smelly locals though. I guess the French will have to find the Belgians somewhere to live.
While I personally believe in the whole "Chosen People" deal, I do accept that that carries no real weight with anyone else. I consider the State of Israel's legitimacy to stem from the will of its people, just like every other nation... including Palestine.
...You know there's a reason Israel's creation came on the heels of World War II, right?(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/940871_467353243342546_1253323597_n.png)
I'd quite like to own Belgium based on land claims in my holy book. The Anglo-Saxons shouldn't mind, they have the rest of Europe, after all. I'm not happy to live with any of the smelly locals though. I guess the French will have to find the Belgians somewhere to live.
While I personally believe in the whole "Chosen People" deal, I do accept that that carries no real weight with anyone else. I consider the State of Israel's legitimacy to stem from the will of its people, just like every other nation... including Palestine.
There are two grounds for establishing land ownership:
Personal. If this sort of ownership were accepted, a Jewish state could not exist in Palestine. There'd be an unrestricted right of return (because Palestinians own the land they lived on when ethnically cleansed, as individuals).
Collective. If this sort of ownership were accepted, a Jewish state could not exist in Palestine. A religious claim made by Germans and Poles to own land in Arabia is obviously silly.
Israel exists on the sufferance of the international community. It has no rights, just privileges granted because we're nice (and I think that's fair enough). Maybe the people who actually do have rights could exercise them?
Why did Israel have to be there though? If the Allies cared so much, they should've given up some of their land instead.Technically, they did. Palestine was a British colony. Besides, the original plan allowed Palestine to continue existing. It's just that they declared war the SAME DAY that Israel was created. While I do believe the Palestinians should have their own country, they shouldn't be able to deprive the Jews of Israel.
OMG that PP misrep is how old now? 20 years? On a 50 year old quote out
-of-critical-fucking-context from Sanger.
Why won't it die? Well, I guess the same reason birther b.s. won't, either.
What the fuck is going on with that baby's eyes?!
(http://i.imgur.com/iP41Lyp.jpg)
What the fuck is going on with that baby's eyes?!
Kirby is trying to come out of his face!
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs36/f/2008/266/f/b/Sonic__s_Eye_Infection_by_Bonus_kun.png)
To be honest I don't like cheering the deaths of anybody. A calmer more relieved 'they're gone and can't hurt anyone else' is my sort of 'celebration'.Fine, that's your choice. I have no problem with that, as long as you don't judge people who do cheer the deaths of bad people.
To be honest I don't like cheering the deaths of anybody. A calmer more relieved 'they're gone and can't hurt anyone else' is my sort of 'celebration'.Fine, that's your choice. I have no problem with that, as long as you don't judge people who do cheer the deaths of bad people.
And wouldn't you know it? More antisemitism!
(http://i.imgur.com/8uU8EZo.jpg)
And wouldn't you know it? More antisemitism!
(http://i.imgur.com/8uU8EZo.jpg)
He'd have a good point about the banks and the two parties if he weren't a virulent bigot towards the Jews.
*snip*He's a lazy bum.
What's with the constant reuse of that same "Evil Jewish Guy" caricature?!
To be honest I don't like cheering the deaths of anybody. A calmer more relieved 'they're gone and can't hurt anyone else' is my sort of 'celebration'.
To be honest I don't like cheering the deaths of anybody. A calmer more relieved 'they're gone and can't hurt anyone else' is my sort of 'celebration'.
Yeah, that's how I am too. As my father put it, "I'm not going to cheer for anyone's death, and I'd rather he'd been taken alive, but I'm certainly not going to mourn the bastard."
Can someone pull up the stats comparing # of dads who dont pay childsupport by race
While were at it, I have a question. Is there even such a thing as a mom having to pay child support if she abandons her kid, leaving the dad to be a single parent? Probably not, I would assume.
Also many parents don't seek child support
Now for some more racism.
(http://i.imgur.com/AVlyuNX.jpg)
It says 'Steve Greenberg' at the top left corner, but I don't think that's the guy's name. I can't think of his name but I recognize the caricature of the Jewish guy.
So, all this guy does is photoshop existing cartoons? What a lazy piece of shit!Yeah, he's the laziest anti-Semite since that Russian asshat who wrote The Protocols of Zion (which was plagiarized).
(http://i.imgur.com/AVlyuNX.jpg)
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
Fair enough. It just seems like the meme that you always hear about is "couple splits, guy pays child support." Then again, there's a lot of inaccurate ideas society loves to propagate for whatever reason.
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
One of the racial stereotypes of black people (from the 50s or 60s and such) is that the job that they commonly get is shining the shoes of richer white men.
Not to mention the whole "black man being given a white man's burden" is blatantly racist.
I'm not sure what you saw that wasn't racist, actually.
(http://i.imgur.com/hs2RWT8.jpg)
So, all this guy does is photoshop existing cartoons? What a lazy piece of shit!
(http://i.imgur.com/AVlyuNX.jpg)
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
One of the racial stereotypes of black people (from the 50s or 60s and such) is that the job that they commonly get is shining the shoes of richer white men.
Not to mention the whole "black man being given a white man's burden" is blatantly racist.
I'm not sure what you saw that wasn't racist, actually.
There's also how Obama was speaking. "Oh mas'r Sam, this does me good ye can't tell"?
Highly fucking racist. In the same vein as to why it was racist for Obama to be called 'boy' during the election race.
It's a common insult towards blacks from other blacks. The connotation is that Obama is letting himself be controlled by rich white guys. "White Man's Burden" is being used sarcastically here, saying that the wars were white men's wars, and that he's continuing them for his white masters.
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
One of the racial stereotypes of black people (from the 50s or 60s and such) is that the job that they commonly get is shining the shoes of richer white men.
Not to mention the whole "black man being given a white man's burden" is blatantly racist.
I'm not sure what you saw that wasn't racist, actually.
There's also how Obama was speaking. "Oh mas'r Sam, this does me good ye can't tell"?
Highly fucking racist. In the same vein as to why it was racist for Obama to be called 'boy' during the election race.
See, I understand why that is racist. Calling a black man "boy" has all sorts of implications for the rights they should be allowed and the dignity they are entitled to and so on.
It isn't racist to use a caricatured stereotype. That's pretty much all cartooning. If you have an Engishman, he's drinking tea or he has a big hat. If you have an Australian, he's wearing the stupid cork-hat thing. That's not racist. It's racist when you're creating a stereotype that has some implication for how those people should be treated. Black people are obsessed with watermelon because they totally can't control their urges.
That's what calling a black man "boy" does. The cartoon in question- I don't think it's doing that. Sure, it's saying that Obama is basically no different to a white president, serving the interests of the powerful (who are all white) to the detriment of his own ethnic group. Like some slaves on a plantation used to. You might say that's wrong, but I don't see how it's racist.
(http://i.imgur.com/ELoC7OW.jpg)
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
One of the racial stereotypes of black people (from the 50s or 60s and such) is that the job that they commonly get is shining the shoes of richer white men.
Not to mention the whole "black man being given a white man's burden" is blatantly racist.
I'm not sure what you saw that wasn't racist, actually.
There's also how Obama was speaking. "Oh mas'r Sam, this does me good ye can't tell"?
Highly fucking racist. In the same vein as to why it was racist for Obama to be called 'boy' during the election race.
See, I understand why that is racist. Calling a black man "boy" has all sorts of implications for the rights they should be allowed and the dignity they are entitled to and so on.
It isn't racist to use a caricatured stereotype. That's pretty much all cartooning. If you have an Engishman, he's drinking tea or he has a big hat. If you have an Australian, he's wearing the stupid cork-hat thing. That's not racist. It's racist when you're creating a stereotype that has some implication for how those people should be treated. Black people are obsessed with watermelon because they totally can't control their urges.
That's what calling a black man "boy" does. The cartoon in question- I don't think it's doing that. Sure, it's saying that Obama is basically no different to a white president, serving the interests of the powerful (who are all white) to the detriment of his own ethnic group. Like some slaves on a plantation used to. You might say that's wrong, but I don't see how it's racist.
You didn't read my whole post thus I see no reason to have to repeat myself.
Leaving aside the unbelievable racism, shouldn't that be spoilered for the NSFW imagery?It is now.
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
One of the racial stereotypes of black people (from the 50s or 60s and such) is that the job that they commonly get is shining the shoes of richer white men.
Not to mention the whole "black man being given a white man's burden" is blatantly racist.
I'm not sure what you saw that wasn't racist, actually.
There's also how Obama was speaking. "Oh mas'r Sam, this does me good ye can't tell"?
Highly fucking racist. In the same vein as to why it was racist for Obama to be called 'boy' during the election race.
See, I understand why that is racist. Calling a black man "boy" has all sorts of implications for the rights they should be allowed and the dignity they are entitled to and so on.
It isn't racist to use a caricatured stereotype. That's pretty much all cartooning. If you have an Engishman, he's drinking tea or he has a big hat. If you have an Australian, he's wearing the stupid cork-hat thing. That's not racist. It's racist when you're creating a stereotype that has some implication for how those people should be treated. Black people are obsessed with watermelon because they totally can't control their urges.
That's what calling a black man "boy" does. The cartoon in question- I don't think it's doing that. Sure, it's saying that Obama is basically no different to a white president, serving the interests of the powerful (who are all white) to the detriment of his own ethnic group. Like some slaves on a plantation used to. You might say that's wrong, but I don't see how it's racist.
You didn't read my whole post thus I see no reason to have to repeat myself.
I'm not sure that this is racist, I haven't made up my mind. Explain why you think it's racist.
One of the racial stereotypes of black people (from the 50s or 60s and such) is that the job that they commonly get is shining the shoes of richer white men.
Not to mention the whole "black man being given a white man's burden" is blatantly racist.
I'm not sure what you saw that wasn't racist, actually.
There's also how Obama was speaking. "Oh mas'r Sam, this does me good ye can't tell"?
Highly fucking racist. In the same vein as to why it was racist for Obama to be called 'boy' during the election race.
See, I understand why that is racist. Calling a black man "boy" has all sorts of implications for the rights they should be allowed and the dignity they are entitled to and so on.
It isn't racist to use a caricatured stereotype. That's pretty much all cartooning. If you have an Engishman, he's drinking tea or he has a big hat. If you have an Australian, he's wearing the stupid cork-hat thing. That's not racist. It's racist when you're creating a stereotype that has some implication for how those people should be treated. Black people are obsessed with watermelon because they totally can't control their urges.
That's what calling a black man "boy" does. The cartoon in question- I don't think it's doing that. Sure, it's saying that Obama is basically no different to a white president, serving the interests of the powerful (who are all white) to the detriment of his own ethnic group. Like some slaves on a plantation used to. You might say that's wrong, but I don't see how it's racist.
You didn't read my whole post thus I see no reason to have to repeat myself.
It's establishing the Obama-serving-white-interests-just-like-Uncle-Toms-on-the-plantation metaphor. Is that metaphor racist, and why?
(http://i.imgur.com/ELoC7OW.jpg)
(click to show/hide)
Spoilered for NSFW imagery.
No keep playing this game Fred. It amuses us to have you make everyone assume you're a total idiot.
What's this even trying to say? That Rabbis like to rape little girls?
It's establishing the Obama-serving-white-interests-just-like-Uncle-Toms-on-the-plantation metaphor. Is that metaphor racist, and why?
It does racialize the issue. But asserting that race is important isn't (necessarily) racist, even if you are in error, and even if the way you do it is highly charged.It's establishing the Obama-serving-white-interests-just-like-Uncle-Toms-on-the-plantation metaphor. Is that metaphor racist, and why?
It racializes an issue that is political and economic in nature. Obama's actions in continuing the War on Terror aren't related to his race, they're related to his position.
Are you plumbing the archives of resist.org?Yup. There's a goldmine of material to poke fun at in there.
Fred, you share some blame in this, too, for your own behavior, not to mention snipe-backs are just as bad. You have an increasingly bad habit of rejecting any arguments that disagree with your own notions, and you act like an arrogant jack-ass while you're doing so. You often complain that people don't address your arguments when they are, in fact, addressing your arguments. And when someone explains something about American culture to you, you choose to reject it as you have done in this thread. If I were an armchair psychologist I'd say that you have a superiority complex.
Basically, you're walking flame-bait. What's saving you from an official warning is that I don't think you're stupid enough to do it intentionally. That being said, I'm not going to soften my blows. You want people to stop flaming you? Stop pissing people off. Start using honest arguments. Stop being antagonistic. If you can't be respectful to your opponents when arguing, get out of the argument.
Of course, in Flame and Burn you're allowed to be more antagonistic, but then people have the right to take out their frustration on you, too, so there you go.
I'm out.
/mod-horns off
It's establishing the Obama-serving-white-interests-just-like-Uncle-Toms-on-the-plantation metaphor. Is that metaphor racist, and why?
It racializes an issue that is political and economic in nature. Obama's actions in continuing the War on Terror aren't related to his race, they're related to his position.
Is this the "Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina" thing you were talking about? I found it independently.
(http://i.imgur.com/LqRBgUn.jpg)
Regardless of how delightfully memetic it is, however, it still qualifies as one of the worst political cartoons in history.
What's this even trying to say? That Rabbis like to rape little girls?
On empty planes, apparently. Which you can't guarantee without a private charter. Even accepting any sort of 'Jews = control all the world's money' conspiracy, this still seems like an unnecessarily expensive way to run a paedophile ring, so I'm still confused.
The whole thing not only makes no sense, but makes no sense on the terms that it sets.
Is this the "Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina" thing you were talking about? I found it independently.
(http://i.imgur.com/LqRBgUn.jpg)
Regardless of how delightfully memetic it is, however, it still qualifies as one of the worst political cartoons in history.
(http://i.imgur.com/bMo3mcj.jpg)
Can we please have "Revenge of the Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina? That would surely rank among the greatest films ever.
*snip*In what way?
I would LOVE to "shop" this one!
I wasn't originally going to make a big deal of it. But given that Fred responded, I have to say that I agree unqualifiedly with he has written here.(click to show/hide)
This is probably ill-advised, but I do feel the need to defend myself here. I've been accused of dishonesty (something I'm always smashed for accusing). I've also been accused of arrogance, deliberately or unintentionally baiting flaming and worse. This is, I think, blatantly unfair. You're mistaking disagreement for arrogance.
If you go back and look, I didn't 'reject' any argument. I made a very long post disputing someone else's argument. Debate. I disagreed and made an argument supporting that disagreement. If that's arrogant, okay, I'm arrogant. But I didn't 'reject' anything.
I would actually describe your insistence that I know nothing about American culture as arrogant.
*snip*In what way?
I would LOVE to "shop" this one!
In that case, I'd love to see you shop this one too.*snip*In what way?
I would LOVE to "shop" this one!
I dunno. Did you see my post about altering these cartoons to reflect a Progressive bent? I wrote this under my altered version of the "Jewish Movie Weirdo" one.
Since there are folks with idiot worldviews who like to photoshop their idiocy onto (mostly) non-idiot political cartoons, I'd thought that it might be fun to do the same to them. I'll take these fundy/bigot-toons & change them into something Progressive or apolitical. I'll post them here. Waddaya say, guys? I'll even change the cartoonist names into something spoofy (I should have changed 'A Wyatt Mann', here, to 'A Wrayatt Gurl' or something).
In that case, I'd love to see you shop this one too.*snip*In what way?
I would LOVE to "shop" this one!
I dunno. Did you see my post about altering these cartoons to reflect a Progressive bent? I wrote this under my altered version of the "Jewish Movie Weirdo" one.
Since there are folks with idiot worldviews who like to photoshop their idiocy onto (mostly) non-idiot political cartoons, I'd thought that it might be fun to do the same to them. I'll take these fundy/bigot-toons & change them into something Progressive or apolitical. I'll post them here. Waddaya say, guys? I'll even change the cartoonist names into something spoofy (I should have changed 'A Wyatt Mann', here, to 'A Wrayatt Gurl' or something).
Is everything a Jewish conspiracy to these people?
By the way, you misspelled "Brony".
Click the link this one is particularly badI got a broken link.
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/liberal-logic-101-402.jpg
Click the link this one is particularly bad
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/liberal-logic-101-402.jpg
Putting www at the beginning fixed it for me. Upon seeing it, there was MAJOR eye-rolling at the 'logic' on my part.
That's so dumb, I don't even know where to begin...
(http://i.imgur.com/ljP5u6e.jpg)
Is everything a Jewish conspiracy to these people?
By the way, you misspelled "Brony".
(http://i.imgur.com/ljP5u6e.jpg)
Is everything a Jewish conspiracy to these people?
By the way, you misspelled "Brony".
I'm still confused on how they can call this "liberal logic" at all.
I'm still confused on how they can call this "liberal logic" at all.
The people who run that site have barely a cursory knowledge of what a liberal is. To them, it's anyone they don't like, or anyone Rush Limbaugh tells them not to like.
I'm still confused on how they can call this "liberal logic" at all.
The people who run that site have barely a cursory knowledge of what a liberal is. To them, it's anyone they don't like, or anyone Rush Limbaugh tells them not to like.
Yeah, but...isn't it supposed to showcase what they think liberals think? How does this pic show any sort of "this is how they think" at all?
I'm still confused on how they can call this "liberal logic" at all.
The people who run that site have barely a cursory knowledge of what a liberal is. To them, it's anyone they don't like, or anyone Rush Limbaugh tells them not to like.
Yeah, but...isn't it supposed to showcase what they think liberals think? How does this pic show any sort of "this is how they think" at all?
Here's the picture Kefka linked to:I have to say, compared to many other liberallogic posters, this one makes even a small bit of sense. The underlying assumptions are still wrong, of course.
(http://i.imgur.com/Se8JACZ.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/PBEnAXu.jpg)
(http://www.rightwingwatch.org/sites/default/files/BarberHomophobicTweet.jpg)
This jackass is a lawyer for the Liberty Counsel and contributor to WND.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iyL9D8uSGDM/TaL4c50EumI/AAAAAAAAFy4/Jf3W3qDIq1k/s1600/world_cartoon.gif)
I think it's supposed to be a WWI spiked helmet.(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iyL9D8uSGDM/TaL4c50EumI/AAAAAAAAFy4/Jf3W3qDIq1k/s1600/world_cartoon.gif)
Well, this is a new approach....instead of a bearded Snidely Whiplash with a super-schnooz, Mr. Evil-Jewish-Stereotype-Guy is a.....giant chimpanzee wearing a baseball cap?!
So yeah I'm guess that's another cartoon ripped off from a moderate or liberal cartoonist and sloppily photoraped by Das Douchenozzle. "Blind men describing an elephant". It must have been a GOP elephant originally, no idea ATM what the blind-folded characters are supposed to be saying, but was probably innocuous snipes at republican pols and their tactics.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iyL9D8uSGDM/TaL4c50EumI/AAAAAAAAFy4/Jf3W3qDIq1k/s1600/world_cartoon.gif)
This is... I got nothing.
(http://i.imgur.com/belVejZ.jpg)
I think it's supposed to be a WWI spiked helmet.(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iyL9D8uSGDM/TaL4c50EumI/AAAAAAAAFy4/Jf3W3qDIq1k/s1600/world_cartoon.gif)
Well, this is a new approach....instead of a bearded Snidely Whiplash with a super-schnooz, Mr. Evil-Jewish-Stereotype-Guy is a.....giant chimpanzee wearing a baseball cap?!
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/393/096/cbb.jpg)
(click to show/hide)
*snip*This image reminds me... anybody else notice that Sonic only has one eye?
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs36/f/2008/266/f/b/Sonic__s_Eye_Infection_by_Bonus_kun.png)
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/431/022/767.jpg)
That picture is so stupid it literally gave me a fucking headache I'm not kidding just looking at it caused my mind to hurt.
*snip*
HERE'S THE ORIGINALS!
Sadly, Mr. Garrison seems to be a bit nutty even without the vandalism!
(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/the-exorcism-of-crony-capitalism_zpsb77d65de.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/the-exorcism-of-crony-capitalism_zpsb77d65de.jpg.html)(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/big_government_cartoon1_zps55eff020.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/big_government_cartoon1_zps55eff020.jpg.html)(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/ben_garrison_does_bernanke_zpsad5634af.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/ben_garrison_does_bernanke_zpsad5634af.jpg.html)(http://i42.tinypic.com/ie05ko.jpg)
So, do you guys suppose that this constant vandalism is actually a stealth protest by a sane Progressive as a means to call attention to Ron Paul's silliness?
*snip*
HERE'S THE ORIGINALS!
Sadly, Mr. Garrison seems to be a bit nutty even without the vandalism!
(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/the-exorcism-of-crony-capitalism_zpsb77d65de.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/the-exorcism-of-crony-capitalism_zpsb77d65de.jpg.html)(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/big_government_cartoon1_zps55eff020.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/big_government_cartoon1_zps55eff020.jpg.html)(http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/ben_garrison_does_bernanke_zpsad5634af.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/ben_garrison_does_bernanke_zpsad5634af.jpg.html)(http://i42.tinypic.com/ie05ko.jpg)
So, do you guys suppose that this constant vandalism is actually a stealth protest by a sane Progressive as a means to call attention to Ron Paul's silliness?
Maybe. However, if these are the work of "A. Wyatt Mann", probably not.
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/393/108/cd7.png)
Video games are a conspiracy too? Really?
Five. That's the number of attractive, intelligent women in my current social circle who I know for a fact are dedicated pegasisters. Three. That's the number of them who are currently in long term committed relationships. One. Is currently married and planning to have kids.Are any of them white?
So yeah. I don't think any of those women would be repulsed by a Brony.
Five. That's the number of attractive, intelligent women in my current social circle who I know for a fact are dedicated pegasisters. Three. That's the number of them who are currently in long term committed relationships. One. Is currently married and planning to have kids.Are any of them white?
So yeah. I don't think any of those women would be repulsed by a Brony.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/505/896/bd5.jpg)
Five. That's the number of attractive, intelligent women in my current social circle who I know for a fact are dedicated pegasisters. Three. That's the number of them who are currently in long term committed relationships. One. Is currently married and planning to have kids.Are any of them white?
So yeah. I don't think any of those women would be repulsed by a Brony.
Then that truly does invalidate that idiot's point.Five. That's the number of attractive, intelligent women in my current social circle who I know for a fact are dedicated pegasisters. Three. That's the number of them who are currently in long term committed relationships. One. Is currently married and planning to have kids.Are any of them white?
So yeah. I don't think any of those women would be repulsed by a Brony.
All of them.
(http://i.imgur.com/ljP5u6e.jpg)
Is everything a Jewish conspiracy to these people?
By the way, you misspelled "Brony".
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/393/108/cd7.png)
Video games are a conspiracy too? Really?
But of course.
Yet these morons don't understand that the US gov't already has propaganda games that more people than you might expect play. They just don't play them as much as the fad "evil games" of Call of Duty. They'll never let us forget there was a mass murder airport scene in call of duty.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/505/896/bd5.jpg)
I'm willing to bet that person is a clopper...
I don't think Billy the Heretic got enough attention....
(http://www.billytheheretic.com/pages/images/passover.jpg)
And I'm wondering if the cartoonist ever heard of the black city that is clean and safe here; Atlanta, Georgia (majority African American within city limits). I used to live there, 1.5 miles from downtown, safely, happily and very proud of the place, for almost 30 years? Or how about Nairobi? It's quite cosmopolitan and fun to visit. Or are Johannesburg or Cape Town good enough? Also majority black.
And I'm wondering if the cartoonist ever heard of the black city that is clean and safe here; Atlanta, Georgia (majority African American within city limits). I used to live there, 1.5 miles from downtown, safely, happily and very proud of the place, for almost 30 years? Or how about Nairobi? It's quite cosmopolitan and fun to visit. Or are Johannesburg or Cape Town good enough? Also majority black.
Yeah I was surprised by Atlanta when I went for Dragon*Con. I expected a city like New York City in terms of uncleanliness but I was pleasantly surprised.
And I'm wondering if the cartoonist ever heard of the black city that is clean and safe here; Atlanta, Georgia (majority African American within city limits). I used to live there, 1.5 miles from downtown, safely, happily and very proud of the place, for almost 30 years? Or how about Nairobi? It's quite cosmopolitan and fun to visit. Or are Johannesburg or Cape Town good enough? Also majority black.
Actually, what's really sad is that...some of the artwork, in and of itself, is fairly good. Kinda like the dudes who do some of the Chick Tracts: decent talent being put to poor use.
Actually, what's really sad is that...some of the artwork, in and of itself, is fairly good. Kinda like the dudes who do some of the Chick Tracts: decent talent being put to poor use.
Actually, what's really sad is that...some of the artwork, in and of itself, is fairly good. Kinda like the dudes who do some of the Chick Tracts: decent talent being put to poor use.
Or Dees. He may be an anti-Semitic loony, but he is a Photoshop god.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/506/943/fcb.jpg)
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/506/943/fcb.jpg)
Schindler's List 2!
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t629071/
Some people do love Billy
Though there is also the business where people compare the current movement to the civil rights movements, when it really, really isn't. It's a movement for rights, but there was a whole lot more on the table in 'the' civil rights movement including far greater hurdles and activism.
I can guarantee that they never read the comic then. If they had, they'd never have used V's mask.http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t629071/
Some people do love Billy
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that one of them uses V's mask as an avatar, when one of the hallmarks of the fascist government he was fighting was Holocaust-level racism and homophobia?
V's Guy Fawkes mask has become a vague symbol of rebellion against 'The System', without needing to specify what aspect of what system you're rebelling against or why, and certainly without having to think if your ideals would go in direct opposition to those originally associated with the symbol.I can guarantee that they never read the comic then. If they had, they'd never have used V's mask.http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t629071/
Some people do love Billy
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that one of them uses V's mask as an avatar, when one of the hallmarks of the fascist government he was fighting was Holocaust-level racism and homophobia?
Almost certainly, and there was at least some overlap(and of course some conflict) between them. Though be careful with that as it's more or less the positive description of the slippery slope argument, some folks hop on it and ride it all the way to bestiality land. Which is actually another thing the current movement has in common with civil rights.Though there is also the business where people compare the current movement to the civil rights movements, when it really, really isn't. It's a movement for rights, but there was a whole lot more on the table in 'the' civil rights movement including far greater hurdles and activism.
Do you think there was maybe a snowball effect- once it became unacceptable to murder/assault/strip of legal rights/etc. people because of X, it became far less acceptable to do it because of Y? (I get the feeling that's what happened- see the Women's Suffrage movement. Women couldn't vote until after men of other races could)...
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ztu434.jpg)What the actual fuck?
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ztu434.jpg)What the actual fuck?
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ztu434.jpg)What the actual fuck?
This reminds me of Morbo.
(http://www.billytheheretic.com/pages/images/usseconomy.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/935456_10151495743268005_700257206_n.jpg)
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ztu434.jpg)What the actual fuck?
This reminds me of Morbo.
I can't be the only one who thinks this is supposed to be a satire of actual anti-immigration propaganda.
Another example of "Good artist...bad subject". Out of context, those cartoons are cute & amusing but with the "Immigration" jazz stuck to it, it's just bigoted & wrong!
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/935456_10151495743268005_700257206_n.jpg)
"Informed conservative" Is just someone who is deluded by fox news.
The sad thing is, that wasn't always the case. Why can't the GOP just dump the social conservatives and go back to its roots?"Informed conservative" Is just someone who is deluded by fox news.
It's more commonly an oxymoron.
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ztu434.jpg)What the actual fuck?
This reminds me of Morbo.
I can't be the only one who thinks this is supposed to be a satire of actual anti-immigration propaganda.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/487/338/374.png)
Of course it's modified. I think we've established the fact that whoever does these is a lazy fuck.(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/487/338/374.png)
Here's the original:
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AbWc0s0cmE8/UE3xsAmBMFI/AAAAAAAA5Ac/7rML63Bjhwk/s640/Politics+1284.jpg)
Of course it's modified. I think we've established the fact that whoever does these is a lazy fuck.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/487/338/374.png)Horrible photoshop job.
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ztu434.jpg)
Posted this on another topic, but I'll bring it here.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/383542_10151265707010070_330224545_n.jpg)
(http://moonbattery.com/obama-rules-of-engagement.jpg)People can change, you moron.
(http://moonbattery.com/obama-rules-of-engagement.jpg)
(http://moonbattery.com/obama-rules-of-engagement.jpg)People can change, you moron.
Looks like Mr. Mann fancies himself a poet, too.I wonder if Spuki can modify this.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/c/cb/Kikepoem.jpg)
Maybe.Looks like Mr. Mann fancies himself a poet, too.I wonder if Spuki can modify this.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/c/cb/Kikepoem.jpg)
Here's an extremely offensive comic.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/2/23/Rcrumbjew1.png)
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/a/a8/Rcrumbjew2.png)
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/6/6c/Rcrumbjew3.png)
Well, at least it's slightly more realistic than The Turner Diaries.
Maybe.Looks like Mr. Mann fancies himself a poet, too.I wonder if Spuki can modify this.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/c/cb/Kikepoem.jpg)
Dynamic Dragon, would you please stop posting ginormous pictures!?I'll do my best. I just need a photobucket account.
Tinypic's faster, no account needed and you can resize quickly.Thanks for the tip.
Guess what's back?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/v/979507_10200323582390954_890434300_n.jpg?oh=3166582d8155a9616944451cefda111e&oe=51A61508&__gda__=1369898588_6777e16324d559e98e489baaa995b03b)
This isn't wrong because it's anti-Obama.
It's wrong because it just lies about what he was saying.
"The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together."
Now how is that different from what Kennedy said? And why does that pasrt keep getting excluded when conservatives recount the speech?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/jul/18/context-obamas-you-didnt-build-comment/
I love how they're trying to pretend they give a flying fuck about what Kennedy had to say.
It's so amusing that these Tealiban bozos quote KENNEDY of all people!
These guys HATE ANYTHING "KENNEDY"!
Tealibans are not only stupid, they're inconsistent.
Looks like Mr. Mann fancies himself a poet, too.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/c/cb/Kikepoem.jpg)
Looks like Mr. Mann fancies himself a poet, too.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/c/cb/Kikepoem.jpg)
As a woman who fully intends to marry a Jewish man, I just want to strangle someone. Preferably Mr. Mannnnnnnn.
(http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/527192/1031883.jpg)Architecture the ruins in Mali
Where's the evidence of European civilisation? Point to one point of sustained peace, ever, in European history. When have they not committed some horrific offence against completely innocent people?
Where's the evidence of European civilisation? Point to one point of sustained peace, ever, in European history. When have they not committed some horrific offence against completely innocent people?
What part of Europe? Post-WWII they've pretty much cleaned up their act in Western Europe (well, until recently with all the anti-Islam xenophobia).
Where's the evidence of European civilisation? Point to one point of sustained peace, ever, in European history. When have they not committed some horrific offence against completely innocent people?When they've done it to eachother?
Iraq? European?
Ironbite-Fred come on now...
Architecture: THE FUCKING PYRAMIDS!I think they are referring to the black african not arab. But....
Where's the evidence of European civilisation? Point to one point of sustained peace, ever, in European history. When have they not committed some horrific offence against completely innocent people?When they've done it to eachother?
Big map of African civilizations...(click to show/hide)
And in this comparative map of the ancient world....notice who ain't even on it, besides Greece?(click to show/hide)
Posting these babies as thumbnails. Click them for the bigger picture. Pics are huge but apparently the detail needs to be seen.
AFRICAN CIVILIZATIONS: (http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/Much-Used%20FSTDT%20Stock%20Images/th_8GBwgIF_zps5dad114b.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/Much-Used%20FSTDT%20Stock%20Images/8GBwgIF_zps5dad114b.jpg.html)
THE OTHER MAP: (http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx200/BarbarellaSteele1975/Much-Used%20FSTDT%20Stock%20Images/th_dRT1WUv_zps77a0d448.jpg) (http://s755.photobucket.com/user/BarbarellaSteele1975/media/Much-Used%20FSTDT%20Stock%20Images/dRT1WUv_zps77a0d448.jpg.html)
Architecture: THE FUCKING PYRAMIDS!I think they are referring to the black african not arab. But....Sadly damaged in 2012 during the Mali civil war this is the Djinguerber Mosque(click to show/hide)
I love food. I really do. And the best way to experience another culture is how they do their food. It's amazing how different cultures developed their pallet.I know, right? I love to try new things.
Ironbite-wanna take a trip around the world without leaving home? Find a restaurant that excels in another culture's cuisine.
I love food. I really do. And the best way to experience another culture is how they do their food. It's amazing how different cultures developed their pallet.
Ironbite-wanna take a trip around the world without leaving home? Find a restaurant that excels in another culture's cuisine.
Hey guess who has a new painting, our buddy McNaughton.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/971765_962201909724_328512596_n.jpg)
full image here (http://jonmcnaughton.com/content/ZoomDetailPages/LiberalismIsADisease.html)
Also that's not Satan, that's Emperor Palpatine.
Hey guess who has a new painting, our buddy McNaughton.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/971765_962201909724_328512596_n.jpg)
full image here (http://jonmcnaughton.com/content/ZoomDetailPages/LiberalismIsADisease.html)
Also that's not Satan, that's Emperor Palpatine.
Hey guess who has a new painting, our buddy McNaughton.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/971765_962201909724_328512596_n.jpg)
full image here (http://jonmcnaughton.com/content/ZoomDetailPages/LiberalismIsADisease.html)
Also that's not Satan, that's Emperor Palpatine.
Coitus interruptus is a root of the "problem", now? Didn't even the RCC say, decades ago, that was it okay, along with the rhythm method?Come now, the Catholic Church is a vessel of Satan, everyone knows that!
Plus, nearly every part of every stage in the life cycle of a dandelion is edible and nutritious. Dandelions are only in the US at all because they were brought from England as a food crop. Meanwhile, roses are only grown to look pretty.
Plus, nearly every part of every stage in the life cycle of a dandelion is edible and nutritious. Dandelions are only in the US at all because they were brought from England as a food crop. Meanwhile, roses are only grown to look pretty.
Plus, nearly every part of every stage in the life cycle of a dandelion is edible and nutritious. Dandelions are only in the US at all because they were brought from England as a food crop. Meanwhile, roses are only grown to look pretty.
Thus, the fundie's metaphor has blown up in his face!
Dandelions are not only yummy & nutritious but quite medicinal. Dandelion is good for detoxing the system, a clean bowel & other benefits. It can also be made into a nice wine. An Italian sausage on a bun covered in sauteed dandelion greens is very popular at Italian festivals (being a N.Y. native, I remember it being served at the annual Italian Festival in Buffalo. I never personal tasted it, though but it was popular).
Dandelions are also a great substitute for daisies & buttercups as far as "daisy-chains/rings" & "buttercup under the chin" is concerned.
Making wishes while blowing dandelion fluff.....ahhhhh, childhood.
(http://i42.tinypic.com/ac5si1.jpg)The first two that is not what AA measn the 3rd isn't even trying to be racist
(http://i41.tinypic.com/6gwk94.jpg)
(http://i44.tinypic.com/tz62o.jpg)
Bur....dock?
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/309/0/1/vote_yes__mn_marriage_amendment__by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5k2omv.jpg)
Leave Sonic out of this.
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/309/0/1/vote_yes__mn_marriage_amendment__by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5k2omv.jpg)Dafaq?
Leave Sonic out of this.
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/309/0/1/vote_yes__mn_marriage_amendment__by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5k2omv.jpg)
Leave Sonic out of this.
This has to be a poe no way anyone could take this fucking serious.
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/309/0/1/vote_yes__mn_marriage_amendment__by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5k2omv.jpg)
Leave Sonic out of this.
This has to be a poe no way anyone could take this fucking serious.
I've been to that person's DA profile. It's not a Poe. It's an account filled with Christian propaganda.
Like... hardline, christian protestant, pro-life, anti-gay, no alcohol, anti-evolutionist, anti-science, "We can pray illness and heart disease away", anti-witch/wiccan/pagan, "God has the last word in the USA" propagandaist.
This has to be a poe no way anyone could take this fucking serious.
I've been to that person's DA profile. It's not a Poe. It's an account filled with Christian propaganda.
Like... hardline, christian protestant, pro-life, anti-gay, no alcohol, anti-evolutionist, anti-science, "We can pray illness and heart disease away", anti-witch/wiccan/pagan, "God has the last word in the USA" propagandaist.
Do you have a link for those of us who a masochists?
That thing is really funny because I remember the sonic fan forum I used to be a member of when I was younger, and the owner also ran a site dedicated entirely to homoerotic art and fan fiction of Sonic and Shadow. A good portion of the stuff was rather explicit. I think it was called Sonadow.com or something.
He didn't word it like that, no (abortion did not exist during that time period, nor did Pro-Life and Pro-Choice), however Yahweh (God) makes it very clear his view on the subject and his position with the unborn.
abortion did not exist during that time period
abortion did not exist
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/309/0/1/vote_yes__mn_marriage_amendment__by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5k2omv.jpg)Chris-chan?
Leave Sonic out of this.
(http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/042/6/4/how_can_you_be_offended_by_god____by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5umth6.jpg)
lrn 2 spell kthxbai
(http://i40.tinypic.com/2nr0s47.jpg)
(http://i44.tinypic.com/efhw02.jpg)
Racists really are scraping the bottom of the barrel aren't they?
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/309/0/1/vote_yes__mn_marriage_amendment__by_featherlynnexwarrior-d5k2omv.jpg)
Leave Sonic out of this.
Oh iddent dat precious. The racist graphically raped the anti-rape graphic. The very definition of lame.Can you say...irony?
(http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/liberal-logic-101-264.jpg?w=500&h=416)
1. The death row actually ends up costing the taxpayers more than life sentences http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/ (http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/)
2. [Insert Comment About Cost of Raising Children here]
(http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/liberal-logic-101-264.jpg?w=500&h=416)
1. The death row actually ends up costing the taxpayers more than life sentences http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/ (http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/)
2. [Insert Comment About Cost of Raising Children here]
(http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/liberal-logic-101-264.jpg?w=500&h=416)
1. The death row actually ends up costing the taxpayers more than life sentences http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/ (http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/)
2. [Insert Comment About Cost of Raising Children here]
Remember, though, that conservatives often think the death penalty should be streamlined. No waiting period, no appeals. Just take him out back and shoot him as soon as he's sentenced.
(http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/liberal-logic-101-264.jpg?w=500&h=416)
1. The death row actually ends up costing the taxpayers more than life sentences http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/ (http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/)
2. [Insert Comment About Cost of Raising Children here]
Remember, though, that conservatives often think the death penalty should be streamlined. No waiting period, no appeals. Just take him out back and shoot him as soon as he's sentenced.
...
Nothing in human history has prevented more war than war.
...
HA-HA, get it, it's because the Left is full of radicals who create fake versions of their opponents based on their own limited knowledge of the world!
STOP MOVING YOUR EYES LIKE THAT!
...
"Today we examine the life of little girl. This girl is compelled to mock Climate Change despite the fact she know godanm nothing about it."
...
In other new the Pentagon has allowed heavily pregnant stereotypical white women in frontline combat.
...
In the original it was Monkey appreciation day.
...
HA-HA-HA! Women are all lazy fat pigs and oh my god I'm just so lonely.
...
While the message if this isn't bad, the weirdness made me go into a corner and sit for half an hour.
How did they get a draft card and a lighter inside that pregnant woman's womb?
At what stage of pregnancy do foetuses produce patriotic headwear?
As for the last cartoon up there, I have no problem at all with conservative bronies. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with the racist and homophobic ones. Yeah, I've met one in person, and hearing some of his comments not minutes after he had told me he was also a brony made me facepalm harder than the stuff he said normally did. Thankfully the other two bronies that I went to school with were more intelligent.
Interesting piece of context I forgot to add in:
The Mallard strip came right after Mt. Luther King Day.
Interesting piece of context I forgot to add in:
The Mallard strip came right after Mt. Luther King Day.
Oh, I get it! It's the old "I' them darkies can 'ave a holidah, wah can't we whayt Murkans have a Whaytey Dah?" garbage (hence the fact that the squirrels/rodents were originally monkeys/apes....a nasty moniker plastered on blacks constantly despite the fact that whites & other ethnicities are apes, too).
I'm also baffled that ethnicist, fundy, misogynists can be bronies. It's like an MRA who enjoys Free To Be You & Me. It makes no sense.
(http://strengthandhonor.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/world_peace.jpg)
Nothing in human history has prevented more war than war.
Interesting piece of context I forgot to add in:
The Mallard strip came right after Mt. Luther King Day.
Oh, I get it! It's the old "I' them darkies can 'ave a holidah, wah can't we whayt Murkans have a Whaytey Dah?" garbage (hence the fact that the squirrels/rodents were originally monkeys/apes....a nasty moniker plastered on blacks constantly despite the fact that whites & other ethnicities are apes, too).
I'm also baffled that ethnicist, fundy, misogynists can be bronies. It's like an MRA who enjoys Free To Be You & Me. It makes no sense.
There's a lot of things that don't make sense. like the fact that Moe Tucker, formerly of the counterculture band Velvet Underground, is now a hardcore Tea Party supporter.
Interesting piece of context I forgot to add in:
The Mallard strip came right after Mt. Luther King Day.
Oh, I get it! It's the old "I' them darkies can 'ave a holidah, wah can't we whayt Murkans have a Whaytey Dah?" garbage (hence the fact that the squirrels/rodents were originally monkeys/apes....a nasty moniker plastered on blacks constantly despite the fact that whites & other ethnicities are apes, too).
I'm also baffled that ethnicist, fundy, misogynists can be bronies. It's like an MRA who enjoys Free To Be You & Me. It makes no sense.
There's a lot of things that don't make sense. like the fact that Moe Tucker, formerly of the counterculture band Velvet Underground, is now a hardcore Tea Party supporter.
Interesting piece of context I forgot to add in:
The Mallard strip came right after Mt. Luther King Day.
Oh, I get it! It's the old "I' them darkies can 'ave a holidah, wah can't we whayt Murkans have a Whaytey Dah?" garbage (hence the fact that the squirrels/rodents were originally monkeys/apes....a nasty moniker plastered on blacks constantly despite the fact that whites & other ethnicities are apes, too).
I'm also baffled that ethnicist, fundy, misogynists can be bronies. It's like an MRA who enjoys Free To Be You & Me. It makes no sense.
There's a lot of things that don't make sense. like the fact that Moe Tucker, formerly of the counterculture band Velvet Underground, is now a hardcore Tea Party supporter.
I know, yeesh! I can understand if she just toned it down and became a more moderate person as she got older but making a 180 into Far-Right stupid is nuts!
.... What would possess a person to switch from a worldview based on open-mindedness, freedom, changing the corrupt status quo, fighting "The Man", human equality, etc. into a worldview based on stodgy, closed-minded selfishness, bigotry, repression, hate, etc.? It blows my mind.
I know, yeesh! I can understand if she just toned it down and became a more moderate person as she got older but making a 180 into Far-Right stupid is nuts
I know folks change political sides a lot just as they change religions or other worldviews. I, myself, used to be one of those Bible-nuts. Now, I'm super-Liberal. That said, I am baffled when the change is the other way around. What would possess a person to switch from a worldview based on open-mindedness, freedom, changing the corrupt status quo, fighting "The Man", human equality, etc. into a worldview based on stodgy, closed-minded selfishness, bigotry, repression, hate, etc.? It blows my mind.
R. Crumb, HOOBOY! I never knew what to make of him (other than weird man from an even weirder family that draws really weird & gross cartoons). Doe's he really believe the bigoted stuff he drew, is it irony or is he really a hateful bigot? I'd hear about how "counterculture" he was. However, I also read that he loathed the hippies & youth culture that read his stuff.
As horrid as it is, the comic does seem to be a regurgitation of the most cliche tropes. Perhaps this is a satire. Crumb was an atheist with a very dim view of religion & this comic is supposedly extolling "Christian Morals/Values". That's a red flag, right there. He was also pretty anti-establishment. I think this is a satire rather than genuine hate speech. I think his "Ethnicist/Sexist/Bigoted" stuff was a rather edgy Stealth Parody.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StealthParody
When it comes to conservative bronies, I do find it funny that they like a children show that talks about the virtue of being a decent person and caring about others, yet they turn around and support a party that says it's ok to be a selfish jerkass. After all old school republicans look down right socialist when compared to the current GOP.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/971240_10151481678951275_694293928_n.jpg)
And this is from a liberal page on FB, so did you give a shit when Bush was doing so??
The whole NSA thing has exposed large numbers of people on both sides of the aisle as complete hypocrites who think something is only bad when the other party does it.
I'm putting this here because it's Liberal Logic 101, but I have to admit it's a good point. (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2357)
It's only a good point in that people are defending the modern day use of it (which I have yet to see personally but then this is the only liberal-leaning place I hang out at)
It's a bad point in that it is defending the former use of it.
It's only a good point in that people are defending the modern day use of it (which I have yet to see personally but then this is the only liberal-leaning place I hang out at)
It's a bad point in that it is defending the former use of it.
The good point I saw in it is that it's calling Dems out on their hypocrisy, which they should be. If only it called out the Republicans as well.
He did use taps. However Bush also waterboarded etcIt's only a good point in that people are defending the modern day use of it (which I have yet to see personally but then this is the only liberal-leaning place I hang out at)
It's a bad point in that it is defending the former use of it.
The good point I saw in it is that it's calling Dems out on their hypocrisy, which they should be. If only it called out the Republicans as well.
Did Bush use wiretaps the way the comic describes him? If so then that is less "defence" and merely stating the facts. If not then this comic is lying in order to make a case (when they could have just represented the democrats hypocrisy) and are spoiling a good point by resorting to lying and hypocrisy of their own.
It's only a good point in that people are defending the modern day use of it (which I have yet to see personally but then this is the only liberal-leaning place I hang out at)
It's a bad point in that it is defending the former use of it.
The good point I saw in it is that it's calling Dems out on their hypocrisy, which they should be. If only it called out the Republicans as well.
Did Bush use wiretaps the way the comic describes him? If so then that is less "defence" and merely stating the facts. If not then this comic is lying in order to make a case (when they could have just represented the democrats hypocrisy) and are spoiling a good point by resorting to lying and hypocrisy of their own.
I guess we could add that graphic to the "Even a Stopped Clock" thread. It would be in "good" company ::)
I'm putting this here because it's Liberal Logic 101, but I have to admit it's a good point. (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2357)
I'm putting this here because it's Liberal Logic 101, but I have to admit it's a good point. (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2357)
though they have to lie to make it.
Bush was sweeping everyone up the same as obama.
He just said he was only targeting al queda operatives and only over seas calls. But that ended up being not quite true. In fact Bush got caught in a number of lies about who's information was being gathered and when and where.
And unlike Obama, didnt' even have the cover of the law yet. I mean does not remember the telecoms got retroactive immunity? What do people think they were being giving immunity for?
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/7/att_t_whistleblower_urges_against_immunity
Even when they kind of have a point, they fail.
Ya know, the whole concept of legal immunity confounds me to no end. Except in very, very specific circumstances, it just seems like it gives people an excuse to break the law for the fuck of it. Diplomatic immunity? Worst fucking idea ever. If you're going to work with other countries, you'd damn well better know and abide by their laws. Sure, provide for their defense, but if you run down a nun in the streets of downtown America, then it shouldn't matter if you're a millionaire oil tycoon, a dumbass kid, a regular dick, or a foreign diplomat: you go to fucking prison for breaking the fucking law.
Ya know, the whole concept of legal immunity confounds me to no end. Except in very, very specific circumstances, it just seems like it gives people an excuse to break the law for the fuck of it. Diplomatic immunity? Worst fucking idea ever. If you're going to work with other countries, you'd damn well better know and abide by their laws. Sure, provide for their defense, but if you run down a nun in the streets of downtown America, then it shouldn't matter if you're a millionaire oil tycoon, a dumbass kid, a regular dick, or a foreign diplomat: you go to fucking prison for breaking the fucking law.
I too have some issues with the concept of diplomatic immunity, but there are reasons for it. The main reason is to prevent countries from using their own laws to attack foreign diplomats. Imagine if China could exert pressure on the US by arresting US diplomats on trumped-up charges. And in cases where a diplomat commits a serious crime unrelated to his work, his country will generally waive immunity.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ec755304749b35e5470ce521aa0862fc/tumblr_mog03w5WqP1r21k4vo1_400.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ec755304749b35e5470ce521aa0862fc/tumblr_mog03w5WqP1r21k4vo1_400.jpg)
Do these people not have even the slightest comprehension what the phrase "background check" means? Because, it doesn't involve anything close to what they said here.
"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here."
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ec755304749b35e5470ce521aa0862fc/tumblr_mog03w5WqP1r21k4vo1_400.jpg)
Do these people not have even the slightest comprehension what the phrase "background check" means? Because, it doesn't involve anything close to what they said here.
(click to show/hide)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/d8be180b199793290d2ad51b19d32188/tumblr_moqau7kl4g1sutf5ro1_1280.jpg)
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1001453_576740525682631_1186109328_n.png)
Umm are they talking about the whole NSA spying crap, because if I remember correctly, you can thank the Patriot Act for that, which became legal under Bush, but I forgot you rightwingers tend to forget that detail, right??
Also any business needs to thank the god damn community that they're part of, otherwise you won't have a fucking business to begin with.
Despite the pure wharrgarbl and more taking Obama quotes out of context (and butchering Star Wars), i kind of agree with him about Congress being a hive of scum and villainy, but not for the same reasons.Scum sure, they aren't really effective enough to be worthy of villainy though. They'd have to do SOMETHING to pull that off.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1001453_576740525682631_1186109328_n.png)
Umm are they talking about the whole NSA spying crap, because if I remember correctly, you can thank the Patriot Act for that, which became legal under Bush, but I forgot you rightwingers tend to forget that detail, right??
Also any business needs to thank the god damn community that they're part of, otherwise you won't have a fucking business to begin with.
Despite the pure wharrgarbl and more taking Obama quotes out of context (and butchering Star Wars), i kind of agree with him about Congress being a hive of scum and villainy, but not for the same reasons.
(http://sphotos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/954739_513439058721849_2038029197_n.png)Boy, that escalated quickly.
Yes, because Stalin killed in the name of atheism
Hey look! I found one example of an atheist doing terrible things, and one example each of a muslim and christian who are good people. That totally makes my point!
QuoteHey look! I found one example of an atheist doing terrible things, and one example each of a muslim and christian who are good people. That totally makes my point!
QuoteHey look! I found one example of an atheist doing terrible things, and one example each of a muslim and christian who are good people. That totally makes my point!
Yep pretty much. And if you show a Christian who was evil, he was No True Christiantm, or same with a Muslim who did bad things.
I thought Murika became solishulist when the brown guy came into office.Because it takes away their incentive to work by giving them free money for being unemployed. Or underemployed, as the case may be. In a sense, the latter is hard to argue with, as you lose access to such programs the moment you work more than 20hrs in a week. When you're essentially earning, and relying on, two separate sources of income by staying below the 20hr/wk level, the incentive to do more does, in a sense, disappear, as it will cost you dearly if the additional work hours don't compensate for the welfare you were bringing in beforehand. As someone who's job routinely has me straddling the line of qualifying for aid, I can tell you that this is incredibly irritating.
On a more serious note, there are some rwinger who believe that welfare other safety programs cause poverty.. by helping poor people... somehow.
(http://military.pagannewswirecollective.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/gays-and-women-in-combat.jpg)
I actually can't tell if the artist is even TRYING to portray it as a bad thing
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/liberal-logic-101-435.jpg
Although this is also best since the background is all white males
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/liberal-logic-101-435.jpg
Although this is also best since the background is all white males
There was so much spin put into that image that it's caused a tornado in Antarctica.
Saying Wendy is a baby killer
I've heard the argument made that he was not a True Communist, but a power-hungry maniac who would have joined any side that had the potential to give him more power.
I went to college with a Trotskyist who only ever referred to him as "the traitor, Stalin."
Saying Wendy is a baby killer
Can someone find the pic and post it here instead of a link that my computer is blocking for some reason?
Saying Wendy is a baby killer
Can someone find the pic and post it here instead of a link that my computer is blocking for some reason?
Clicking on the link doesn't work. You have to copy and paste it into the browser window.
Let's see if this works:
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/liberal-logic-101-435-300x249.jpg)
I reuploaded it. Someone had to do it eventually.
(http://i.imgur.com/1HyYfGj.jpg)
I reuploaded it. Someone had to do it eventually.
(http://i.imgur.com/1HyYfGj.jpg)
Ok, is the person who makes these things a dominionist?
I really don't get that liberal logic panel. Are they usually that stupid?
That was the worst pamphlet ever
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/1ec01b5662fc415a206d9e0422935e78/tumblr_mp6g8bcDo71swl9y6o1_500.png)
I call poe on that one, if for no other reason than the fact it's a demotivator.
(http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/amnesia-dd-32_5196.jpg)
(http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=d_YdARurRyM3fM&tbnid=_RdmMuJpHwVnSM:&ved=&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeldmanthecat.com%2F%3Fp%3D36&ei=EVnQUarRBsGpiAK81YGwAg&bvm=bv.48572450,d.cGE&psig=AFQjCNHxCbnS-Nkcr7iVLzMMHoXMgZtRFQ&ust=1372695185341414)
Wait, there was one theory dinosaurs may have been killed off by a vastly different geological climate?
WHAT NOW, HIPPIES?
(http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/files/2011/07/cartoon1.gif)Ironically enough, it would be very improbable for a native speaker of Spanish to make that mistake, because the way we pronounce "José" does not rhyme with "O say". It's a mispronunciation common to native English speakers to add an [ɪ] sound at the end.
The 1950's called, they want their political cartoonist back.
(http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/amnesia-dd-32_5196.jpg)
(http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=d_YdARurRyM3fM&tbnid=_RdmMuJpHwVnSM:&ved=&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeldmanthecat.com%2F%3Fp%3D36&ei=EVnQUarRBsGpiAK81YGwAg&bvm=bv.48572450,d.cGE&psig=AFQjCNHxCbnS-Nkcr7iVLzMMHoXMgZtRFQ&ust=1372695185341414)
Wait, there was one theory dinosaurs may have been killed off by a vastly different geological climate?
WHAT NOW, HIPPIES?
sorry, somehow one of the links went missing, fixed it.
First I was wondering what the heck does that monster have to do with the comment about dinosaurs, then I quoted your post to see if there was maybe a picture that isn't showing.
There is and the link doesn't seem to work, at least on my computer.
The first one who uses the term assimilationWe are the 'Muricans. Your biological and Cultural distinctiveness will be made to resemble our own. Resistance is for terrorist?
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/969877_540484482653900_1881938840_n.jpg)
Because the dumber the conservative, the louder they are?
Though that rule applies to liberals, too... just not as often right now.
Not just censoring, but hypocrisy. There are certain artists 100% banned from being carried at Wal-Mart. However, all Wal-Marts were found carrying one of their CDs. When asked, Wal-Mart said it was commercially viable (debuted at #1 on Billboard) so they were carrying that one.That was the worst pamphlet ever
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/1ec01b5662fc415a206d9e0422935e78/tumblr_mp6g8bcDo71swl9y6o1_500.png)
Walmart censors the Fuck out of its CD's.
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-439.jpg
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-439.jpg
Can you please post the pic directly?! My computer keeps blocking it!!!
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-439.jpg
Can you please post the pic directly?! My computer keeps blocking it!!!
Have you tried the method Magus describes above?
(I'd reupload it anyway, but imgur seems to be down at the moment)
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-439.jpg
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-439.jpg
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-439.jpg
Yoga: has medical benefits
Teebowing: Shameless attempt to look religious.
This one from Answers in Genesis may be the most hypocritical thing ever.
(http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/images/articles/2009/09/Strawman.jpg)
Uh...IKD? Did you forget how to log into your account?
(http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/liberal-logic-101-120.jpg)
Yeah I know, Libtards thinks it's okay to kill a non-sentient clump of cells, but try to let that clump of cells gain sentience and grow up miserable your suddenly a monster!
Okay, I am now convinced that LiberalLogic101 is a brilliant stealthy parody of dumbass Tea Party conservatives. Because, it just isn't possible for anyone to be that fucking stupid.
Five seconds and TinyPic:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/2m0a2r.jpg)
I like how they always use faceless pregnant women....Because they are only interested in the fetus/baby and don't care about the woman which is reflected by not showing her face? As in the pregnancy is the only quality in her that matters?
Do they know this makes them look like they are opposed to efforts to forbid pregnant women drinkingI think they might be. Remember, a lot of them are rednecks.
I am quite certain that is the exact reason.I like how they always use faceless pregnant women....Because they are only interested in the fetus/baby and don't care about the woman which is reflected by not showing her face? As in the pregnancy is the only quality in her that matters?
Old post, I know, but I really want to know what the radio station was playing.Which has as even less facts and science behind it as the anti-vaccination claims, if such thing is possible.I'll admit, the microwave ovens are a new one. :P
Not really. It never grew to the proportions that anti-vaccers and cell-phone paranoiacs have, but there's always been a small, dedicated amount of people claiming that microwaves embedded food with dangerous levels of radiation.
In an unrelated note, microwaves give me a headache. Really, if I stand too close to a microwave that is on it gives me physical pain, this has been true ever since my family got our first microwave. (Although I think it was worse back when I was a kid.)
That is fascinating askold. I wonder if the shape/size of the tiny structures in your middle or inner ears happen to pick up on a harmonic frequency from the radar/radio waves produced by the microwave oven? If so, of course it would be too high a frequency to register within your hearing range, but it could be over-stimulating the audic nerve and perhaps from that, your headache begins?
I used to be able to hear a local radio station because my tooth filling and the orthodontic device I wore at the time created a receiver of sorts (the acidic nature of saliva acting as the micro electrical source in tandem with silver filling and stainless steel braces).
Again with old quoting, but I've got to step in and bring this up. The women of Rockbitch were bisexuals, and NeoPagans. In fact, they invited an entire audience for an orgy after, iirc, a show got canceled. In the end, only one person showed up, a guy. They all had their fun. Additionally, they'd place a strap-on on the head of a guy every show and have fun with it, if you know what I mean. Plus, one member of the band was a fat dude. So, nope.You can understand WHY a lot of radical positions exist--radical feminists who hate men, radical minority-rights groups who hate white people, and there must be people outside the Tumblr community who are gay or trans and sincerely hate straight and cis people--because of histories of violence against the supported group by the target of hate. But that doesn't justify the hate of ALL THESE PEOPLE who never did anything.
The simple fact is, you can't fight hate with hate.
Is there a movement for gays to hate straights? Besides on Tumblr. Like genuine "God I hate those breeders".
There are radscums who call themselves "political lesbians" or "lesbian separatists." I have seen these people say that any woman who claims to be straight or bi is actually brainwashed by the patriarchy and needs to be converted to lesbianism. This is much less hot in practice than in theory, and mostly involves lots of angry yelling, science fails, and bizarre worship of menstrual blood. Oh, and lesbians need to set up their own state where they can be free from the inherently sexist and man-made construction of penis-in-vagina sex.
Sounds a lot like Rockbitch.
I'm more amused by the fact that the missionary looks downright evil.Everyone looks evil in Chick Tracts. Also, would he please retire or something?
I'm more amused by the fact that the missionary looks downright evil.
I'm more amused by the fact that the missionary looks downright evil.
It's almost as if the missionary were Satan himself.
But that would have been too much of a plot twist for old Chick.
Five seconds and TinyPic:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/2m0a2r.jpg)
So much failure at so many topics, history, religion, what a liberal is. Maybe David Barton runs this site?
Especially with a child. Remember what happened to the girl who could count to potato?Five seconds and TinyPic:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/2m0a2r.jpg)
So much failure at so many topics, history, religion, what a liberal is. Maybe David Barton runs this site?
Government. That it's not hypocrisy if the decisions are made by 2 different states.
Also, to be totally fair, it is not advisable to use some anonymous person's face in your propaganda.
Five seconds and TinyPic:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/2m0a2r.jpg)
So much failure at so many topics, history, religion, what a liberal is. Maybe David Barton runs this site?
Government. That it's not hypocrisy if the decisions are made by 2 different states.
Also, to be totally fair, it is not advisable to use some anonymous person's face in your propaganda.
I think you mean "wasn't", Fred
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TbL1DlxW4bM/UVG78_lKt1I/AAAAAAAABh0/QK1yg51FhA8/s320/Holy+Week.jpg)
What the hell is Holy Week, and better yet, what the hell is the point of this?
(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
If you were ever born, in history, your parents chose not to have an abortion. After 1973 they couldn't be prosecuted for it, and your mother was likely to die as a result.
(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
If that is how broad and loose the anti-choice meme maker is defining it, one should point that out and post a counter-meme, "If you are reading this, you are a lightning strike survivor"...volcanic eruption survivor, asteroid strike survivor, tsunami survivor, ad infinitum. Really, we here are all brain cell death survivors, after being exposed to these samples of toxic idiocy. Seriously, what's up with the carving knife image? Fuck...just lost another brain cell!(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
If you were ever born, in history, your parents chose not to have an abortion. After 1973 they couldn't be prosecuted for it, and your mother was likely to die as a result.
Technically speaking, if you were born alive, you're an abortion survivor.
(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
That's ridiculous. You're only an abortion survivor if your mother actually attempted to have an abortion. That's like saying, "if you're alive, you are a Time War survivor." That means nothing unless you were actually in the Time War.
Since when do they indoctrinate kids with socialism and marxism in public schools? Oh right, fundie. Nevermind.
And it's not indoctrinating someone into evolution if you're just teaching it as the fact that it is.
I had to laugh at the second panel too, because that's a BIG difference from what fundies ACTUALLY do with the bible.
(http://therionorteline.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/liberal-logic-101-123.jpg?w=500)I got this sudden sick-humor mental image of a creepy preacher introducing a bible to a little kid, as if they were a puppy being trained to accept a leash, by rubbing the bible gently against their body, head and neck, while saying, "Gooooood bible! Goood boy!" ;D
They're free to reject it, but if they it means Jesus will murder them.
Certainly public schools exist for indoctrination purposes. Just not socialist indoctrination.Agreed. If anything, they exist for patriotic indoctrination. Seriously, the pledge is fucking creepy when you realize small children are doing it and listen to the words.
Since when do they indoctrinate kids with socialism and marxism in public schools? Oh right, fundie. Nevermind.
And it's not indoctrinating someone into evolution if you're just teaching it as the fact that it is.
(http://i49.tinypic.com/2aguow1.gif)Wouldn't it make more sense for his co-pilot to be Biden?
Hell of an Aichi D3A that can carry three 250 kg bombs.
Check todays they are not even pretending to not be racist
They don't let you imbed their pictures. Download them and post them as attachments, please.Check todays they are not even pretending to not be racist
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-441.jpg)
Yes, it being socially unacceptable for white people to use the n-word is totally the same thing as legally enforced segregation, racial violence and centuries of oppression. ::)
And while we're on the topic of idiotic comparisons:
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/liberal-logic-101-433.jpg)
Edit:
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/liberal-logic-101-391.jpg)
Has anyone, anywhere ever seriously suggested that families who home school should be deported?
Whoops. Fixed 'em.Thanks. As for the first one, wow. That's just stupid. The second, one is insulting a group of people for how they were born. The other is insulting a group of people for how they were born. We flip out at both. As for the third, I was homeschooled for a few years, not because of religion (my parents are NeoPagans, I'm an atheist), but because the school I went too was ran by psychopaths and almost everyone in the school had been bullying me for years for being the smart kid. So, double fuck you, fundies, for both making shit up and for trying to blanket all homeschoolers under your banner. And, add another to that for trying to use us as propaganda.
The homeschooling one was this family who wanted to homeschool but what liberal logic leaves out was they are german and its illegal there so yeahAhh, yeah, don't violate your local nation's laws. Besides, what the hell were fundies expecting? Germany's not big on evil mind-control groups. Once is enough. If a nation can birth Rammstein, fundies cannot handle that nation.
...Can I sig that? Like seriously that is the greatest thing I have heard in a long while.Sure, I don't mind.
(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
That's ridiculous. You're only an abortion survivor if your mother actually attempted to have an abortion. That's like saying, "if you're alive, you are a Time War survivor." That means nothing unless you were actually in the Time War.
Also, whats with the knife, I can see what they're trying to get at but wouldn't a coat hangar make more sense?
(http://i50.tinypic.com/359a48w.jpg)
That's ridiculous. You're only an abortion survivor if your mother actually attempted to have an abortion. That's like saying, "if you're alive, you are a Time War survivor." That means nothing unless you were actually in the Time War.
Also, whats with the knife, I can see what they're trying to get at but wouldn't a coat hangar make more sense?
Not with abortion legalized. I guess they think abortions are preformed with knives.
let me try simplifying. Warm air heat ice. Ice release cold water cold water create cold front.
I'm starting to think the maker of Liberal Logic went insane long ago.There is a difference between "Insane" and "Stupid" or "Full of Shit".
(http://netrightdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Cartoon-Completely-Stuck-ALG-600.jpg) It actually does for instance there was a cold snap in europe which kill 200 homeless Ukranians due to the ice in the north melting and causing cold air to drift south
I'm starting to think the maker of Liberal Logic went insane long ago.There is a difference between "Insane" and "Stupid" or "Full of Shit".
Guess which one LibLogic is.
Why are conservitives to unintellegent to understand that Global warming is a side effect of CLIMATE CHANGE. So is any extreme weather.Bad marketing. We pushed the "global warming" too hard. We need to completely retire that phrase and 100% replace it with "climate change".
But the problem IS global warming. The globe is being warmed. Just because this causes local snowfall--which is not even the same as getting colder--& isn't as simple as "the only change is that things are getting warmer," it doesn't mean that it's invalid. Even if we called it climate change, we'd still have to address that it's caused by a global increase in temperatures.Yes, that is completely true. The thing is, it's all about branding. If you can get people to accept the climate is changing, and they can do things to save themselves from it, you've succeeded. The people who say what you just said are not the target audience of a rebranding. The target audience is the people who don't understand that. We need to bypass that issue.
Why are conservitives to unintellegent to understand that Global warming is a side effect of CLIMATE CHANGE. So is any extreme weather.Bad marketing. We pushed the "global warming" too hard. We need to completely retire that phrase and 100% replace it with "climate change".
Sounds like my dad. "Global warming couldn't be real because it was very cold in Connecticut this winter."But really, who do you trust, a bunch of NEEEEERRRRDSSS in lab coats and their fancy-dancy research papers or proud american heroically writing a blog from his mothers basement somewhere in Colorado?
He blames extraordinary weather occurrences and other natural disasters on HAARP and nuclear weapons.
Why are conservitives to unintellegent to understand that Global warming is a side effect of CLIMATE CHANGE. So is any extreme weather.Bad marketing. We pushed the "global warming" too hard. We need to completely retire that phrase and 100% replace it with "climate change".
also ignorance about how weather works (even snow requires some heat to drive it.) and straw man (Al Gore said there would never be snow again!!!!!!!)
He's both hurt and helped the fight.Why are conservitives to unintellegent to understand that Global warming is a side effect of CLIMATE CHANGE. So is any extreme weather.Bad marketing. We pushed the "global warming" too hard. We need to completely retire that phrase and 100% replace it with "climate change".
also ignorance about how weather works (even snow requires some heat to drive it.) and straw man (Al Gore said there would never be snow again!!!!!!!)
Yeah, Al Gore hasn't been much help in the fight against Climate Change.
Sounds like my dad. "Global warming couldn't be real because it was very cold in Connecticut this winter."
He blames extraordinary weather occurrences and other natural disasters on HAARP and nuclear weapons.
(click to show/hide)
It's either about pre-existing conditions, and the idea isn't to make it so you don't just wait until you get sick, the idea is making sure you have it if you do.(click to show/hide)
But...isn't that exactly why the ACA includes a mandate? Isn't it the Republicans who think we shouldn't have to buy insurance if we don't want to? The whole point of being required to buy insurance is so you can't just wait until you get sick and then buy it. So what's the point of the cartoon?
If you wanted Insurance then you should have thought ahead before contracting Sickle Cell disorder on purpose!It's either about pre-existing conditions, and the idea isn't to make it so you don't just wait until you get sick, the idea is making sure you have it if you do.(click to show/hide)
But...isn't that exactly why the ACA includes a mandate? Isn't it the Republicans who think we shouldn't have to buy insurance if we don't want to? The whole point of being required to buy insurance is so you can't just wait until you get sick and then buy it. So what's the point of the cartoon?
Yeah, how dare people get sick!If you wanted Insurance then you should have thought ahead before contracting Sickle Cell disorder on purpose!It's either about pre-existing conditions, and the idea isn't to make it so you don't just wait until you get sick, the idea is making sure you have it if you do.(click to show/hide)
But...isn't that exactly why the ACA includes a mandate? Isn't it the Republicans who think we shouldn't have to buy insurance if we don't want to? The whole point of being required to buy insurance is so you can't just wait until you get sick and then buy it. So what's the point of the cartoon?
Yeah, how dare people get sick!If you wanted Insurance then you should have thought ahead before contracting Sickle Cell disorder on purpose!It's either about pre-existing conditions, and the idea isn't to make it so you don't just wait until you get sick, the idea is making sure you have it if you do.(click to show/hide)
But...isn't that exactly why the ACA includes a mandate? Isn't it the Republicans who think we shouldn't have to buy insurance if we don't want to? The whole point of being required to buy insurance is so you can't just wait until you get sick and then buy it. So what's the point of the cartoon?
The homeschooling one was this family who wanted to homeschool but what liberal logic leaves out was they are german and its illegal there so yeahThere is the possiblity for homeschooling here. If a child is sick or disabled for instance. BUT you have to hire a teacher and said teacher has to stick to the curriculum (and that includes ebil TOS and sex-ed).
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/27bd0aa9efd8666d666c6bff85413f32/tumblr_mp6q5ad7oK1r8kiyko1_500.gif)Does he seriously wear that hat?
And nothing of value was lost.
Does he seriously wear that hat?Probably just artistic license. However, note his bookshelf contains: a bookend, a bible, a coffee mug and what I assume is an inkpot. Also, the President at the top doesn't look anything like Carter.
Even if it's artistic license, that means he sees himself with that hat and likely owns it.Does he seriously wear that hat?Probably just artistic license. However, note his bookshelf contains: a bookend, a bible, a coffee mug and what I assume is an inkpot. Also, the President at the top doesn't look anything like Carter.
He has also drawn himself in old timey clothes that go with the hat. I think it's just artistic license, he drew himself dressed in clothes that represent his beliefs, much like everything in the office does.Even if it's artistic license, that means he sees himself with that hat and likely owns it.Does he seriously wear that hat?Probably just artistic license. However, note his bookshelf contains: a bookend, a bible, a coffee mug and what I assume is an inkpot. Also, the President at the top doesn't look anything like Carter.
He sees himself as an Honest Patriot, and if I recall correctly, the pose is a common image of the Revolutionary Soldier hanging up his musket at the end of the War of Independence.Ahh. Okay, and yeah.
That said, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he did own a tricorner hat.
That makes sense. Still, I agree with Chad, he does likely own one.He has also drawn himself in old timey clothes that go with the hat. I think it's just artistic license, he drew himself dressed in clothes that represent his beliefs, much like everything in the office does.Even if it's artistic license, that means he sees himself with that hat and likely owns it.Does he seriously wear that hat?Probably just artistic license. However, note his bookshelf contains: a bookend, a bible, a coffee mug and what I assume is an inkpot. Also, the President at the top doesn't look anything like Carter.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/27bd0aa9efd8666d666c6bff85413f32/tumblr_mp6q5ad7oK1r8kiyko1_500.gif)
And nothing of value was lost.
Hey now, I own a tricorn hat! They're awesome. Or they were, before the tea party started wearing them, kinda like MRAs and fedoras.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/27bd0aa9efd8666d666c6bff85413f32/tumblr_mp6q5ad7oK1r8kiyko1_500.gif)I almost forgot, here's a collection of works by this crazy-ass fuck:
And nothing of value was lost.
Not really a Political cartoon, but still FundieIf it's protesting security cameras on private property, it's "worst". If it's drawing a comparison to the Trayvon Martin case (young person in a hoodie with snackfood), it's still "worst" for shitty composition but gets points for trying. If it's referencing something I'm not getting, I withdraw my comment.
(http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18lq9vor4i10hjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg)
2, 10, and 12 made some good points, if I read them right.That's the Boston Bomber.
- 2 is saying that France is turning its back on the principles of a free society by banning the public expression of personal religious affiliation, chiefly headscarves. And I agree with that - you can't consider yourself a society with freedom of religion or expression while at the same time banning religious garments from public life.
- 10 is setting up a false dichotomy, to be sure, but does make something of a point on most people's priorities.
- 12 is pretty much spot on.
I agreed with them too(wait, to?), I just felt I should give a thorough look-through on Asays cartoons.Not really a Political cartoon, but still FundieIf it's protesting security cameras on private property, it's "worst". If it's drawing a comparison to the Trayvon Martin case (young person in a hoodie with snackfood), it's still "worst" for shitty composition but gets points for trying. If it's referencing something I'm not getting, I withdraw my comment.
(http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18lq9vor4i10hjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg)
That's the Boston Bomber.That makes more sense.
There are some people who claim that the government did the Boston bombing.
Wait a minute...It's common knowledge guilty people don't consume what we know as "food".
Are they trying to say he's innocent because... he bought food?
What?
Wait a minute...It's common knowledge guilty people don't consume what we know as "food".
Are they trying to say he's innocent because... he bought food?
What?
Or puking. You can't puke.Wait a minute...It's common knowledge guilty people don't consume what we know as "food".
Are they trying to say he's innocent because... he bought food?
What?
It's a modern day version of the ordeal of ingestion. You just need to eat a load of snacks without choking on them to prove your innocence.
Or puking. You can't puke.Wait a minute...It's common knowledge guilty people don't consume what we know as "food".
Are they trying to say he's innocent because... he bought food?
What?
It's a modern day version of the ordeal of ingestion. You just need to eat a load of snacks without choking on them to prove your innocence.
Not really, they specifically said no puking.Or puking. You can't puke.Wait a minute...It's common knowledge guilty people don't consume what we know as "food".
Are they trying to say he's innocent because... he bought food?
What?
It's a modern day version of the ordeal of ingestion. You just need to eat a load of snacks without choking on them to prove your innocence.
So it's basically like a hot dog-eating contest at a county fair?
Wait a minute...It's common knowledge guilty people don't consume what we know as "food".
Are they trying to say he's innocent because... he bought food?
What?
That seems to be a Tumblr joke thing, like that "trophy 4 u" picture that my BF and I think is the funniest thing ever when we're tired. Haphazard text placement, awful spelling, and comic sans.
That seems to be a Tumblr joke thing, like that "trophy 4 u" picture that my BF and I think is the funniest thing ever when we're tired. Haphazard text placement, awful spelling, and comic sans.Unfortunately no, it was written by one of those Free the Boston Bomber teens (I'm afraid to post a direct link, but this article could help:http://gawker.com/freejahar-when-conspiracy-theorists-and-one-direction-478152664 (http://gawker.com/freejahar-when-conspiracy-theorists-and-one-direction-478152664).
(http://www.creators.com/editorial_cartoons/5/26312_thumb.gif)
Where are all these government types forcing people to pay their taxes via gunpoint?I would imagine that for the fine citizen who made these it would be the other way around.
(http://www.creators.com/editorial_cartoons/5/26312_thumb.gif)
Well, now, that's a goddamned lie.
Rule is, you can't proselytize. You're still allowed to evangelize; that is, you can share your religion and tell people about it, you just can't try to convert them.
That seems to be a Tumblr joke thing, like that "trophy 4 u" picture that my BF and I think is the funniest thing ever when we're tired. Haphazard text placement, awful spelling, and comic sans.Unfortunately no, it was written by one of those Free the Boston Bomber teens (I'm afraid to post a direct link, but this article could help:http://gawker.com/freejahar-when-conspiracy-theorists-and-one-direction-478152664 (http://gawker.com/freejahar-when-conspiracy-theorists-and-one-direction-478152664).
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/liberal-logic-101-27.jpg)
Yes LL, thats totally what we do.
...[/img]
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/liberal-logic-101-27.jpg)
Yes LL, thats totally what we do.
...[/img]
it is what straw liberals do.
it also helps if you ignore history as just how "socialist" the Nazis were and where that came from.
It would really depend on when the image was? If it was just before the bombing and the petrol station was far away...but there doesn't seem to be a time stamp on the photo so you could say either way.Well, it seems to be night in the photo and the bombing took place during the day.
Where are all these government types forcing people to pay their taxes via gunpoint?The "at gunpoint" tends to be meant more figuratively than literally. What they're driving at is that the government will arrest you and throw your ass in jail for the crime of not giving them your money (how they look at it, at least). I'm personally not sure how I feel about throwing people in prison for tax evasion...on the one hand, they tend to be assholes about it and not paying your taxes is really not cool. On the other hand, I don't think locking Wesley Snipes up for two years in a medium security prison on top of ordering him to pay 17 million dollars really accomplished anything.
And the People's Republic of China is a republic for the people, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (aka North Korea) is a Democratic Republic for the people.(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/liberal-logic-101-27.jpg)
Yes LL, thats totally what we do.
...[/img]
it is what straw liberals do.
it also helps if you ignore history as just how "socialist" the Nazis were and where that came from.
Well, they had the word "Socialist" in their full name "National Socialist Party" so they MUST have been socialists. In the same way the Democratic Republic of the Congo MUST be a Democratic Republic.
It would really depend on when the image was? If it was just before the bombing and the petrol station was far away...but there doesn't seem to be a time stamp on the photo so you could say either way.Well, it seems to be night in the photo and the bombing took place during the day.Where are all these government types forcing people to pay their taxes via gunpoint?The "at gunpoint" tends to be meant more figuratively than literally. What they're driving at is that the government will arrest you and throw your ass in jail for the crime of not giving them your money (how they look at it, at least). I'm personally not sure how I feel about throwing people in prison for tax evasion...on the one hand, they tend to be assholes about it and not paying your taxes is really not cool. On the other hand, I don't think locking Wesley Snipes up for two years in a medium security prison on top of ordering him to pay 17 million dollars really accomplished anything.
I'm sure he will think twice about not paying his taxes from now on... as will many other people who think they are too rich and powerful to go to jail for such trifling little things.
I doubt the intent was rehabilitation. A rich douchebag thought he was above the law, and was shown otherwise.I'm sure he will think twice about not paying his taxes from now on... as will many other people who think they are too rich and powerful to go to jail for such trifling little things.
True, but I doubt he was rehabilitated by his years in prison nor do I think he was a danger to the community. Sending him to do time (and "Shakespeare Behind Bars" leads me to believe that medium security would put him around murderers and rapist, albeit well behaved ones) was purely punitive. Not the biggest fan of that concept within the law.
But before I go, please, somebody with knowledge of the law inform me.... how many times am I allowed to flog someone with the clue-killamajig before it's considered assault?
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LIYNjxrGKR0/UcDn3BuYwEI/AAAAAAAAV1w/ZPI1fvQPp0w/s1600/Rustad2013-06-18.jpg)
(http://www.bobgarontraining.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Counterthink-Hardened-Criminals1.jpg)
The man laced the milk with specialized chemicals that activate when immersed in mucus (such as the kind found in your stomach), knowing that the milk would be made into ice cream for a party his neighbor was going to, the plan failed when the milk detonated prematurely.
(http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/images/media/cartoons/after-eden/20110107.gif)
The "kid" is actually an alien body snatcher who just used a parasite to "Infect" a human parental unit.
(http://www.bobgarontraining.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Counterthink-Hardened-Criminals1.jpg)
The man laced the milk with specialized chemicals that activate when immersed in mucus (such as the kind found in your stomach), knowing that the milk would be made into ice cream for a party his neighbor was going to, the plan failed when the milk detonated prematurely.
(http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/images/media/cartoons/after-eden/20110107.gif)
The "kid" is actually an alien body snatcher who just used a parasite to "Infect" a human parental unit.
I haven't heard of this milk thing. Do you have a link to the story handy?
(http://www.bobgarontraining.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Counterthink-Hardened-Criminals1.jpg)
The man laced the milk with specialized chemicals that activate when immersed in mucus (such as the kind found in your stomach), knowing that the milk would be made into ice cream for a party his neighbor was going to, the plan failed when the milk detonated prematurely.
(http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/images/media/cartoons/after-eden/20110107.gif)
The "kid" is actually an alien body snatcher who just used a parasite to "Infect" a human parental unit.
I haven't heard of this milk thing. Do you have a link to the story handy?
It might be in relation to this:
http://www.dairyreporter.com/Regulation-Safety/Ban-on-milk-sold-from-cows-with-TB
It's probably in reference to it being illegal to sell unpasteurized (raw) cow's milk. The reason it's illegal is raw cow's milk can spread some nasty diseases to humans. Tuberculosis and brucellosis, for example.
http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-questions-and-answers.html#risks
It's Ted Rall. He also did a cartoon about how the 9/11 widows didn't really love their husbands and are just milking the situation for money. He's kind of a dipshit.It'd be funny if his house was on fire and the firemen knew who he was so intentionally got in a crash to have an excuse to let it burn.
I don't understand how someone could be against abortion and condoms/emergency contraceptives at the same time.
Because "condoms and other contraceptives encourage kids to have sex instead of keeping their legs closed like good little Christian Girls!"
I don't understand how someone could be against abortion and condoms/emergency contraceptives at the same time.Because "condoms and other contraceptives encourage kids to have sex instead of keeping their legs closed like good little Christian Girls!"
Also, some people view the Pill as another form of abortion.
Judaism doesn't, actually, and while elective abortion is prohibited, it's quite acceptable for couples to use contraception to delay having children until they're in a good financial situation. As long as they eventually get around to having kids, it's OK.
I don't understand how someone could be against abortion and condoms/emergency contraceptives at the same time.Because "condoms and other contraceptives encourage kids to have sex instead of keeping their legs closed like good little Christian Girls!"
Also, some people view the Pill as another form of abortion.
Judaism doesn't, actually, and while elective abortion is prohibited, it's quite acceptable for couples to use contraception to delay having children until they're in a good financial situation. As long as they eventually get around to having kids, it's OK.
And those people are morons who are (probably willfully) ignorant on how biology works. The pill prevents pregnancy by emulating the hormone that disables ovulation while the woman is pregnant. There's no ripe egg to fertilize, thus no abortion.
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-456.jpg
This particular one is stupid and rage inducing even for liberal logic
It took me a few attempts to find the offending image behind the broken link. (Am I the only one who can't follow those links directly?)http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-456.jpg
This particular one is stupid and rage inducing even for liberal logic
That one is just fucking heinous >:(
I can't follow the link & I still have no idea what it says.
And they are still taking it too far by demanding the man their son tried to kill be imprisoned. When they admit Zimmerman was merely defending himself, then and only then do they deserve any sympathy.
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5W32FDncGGc/UQVUXtVfDeI/AAAAAAAATDU/6GlX07iNtC0/s320/Varvel2013-01-25.jpg)
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/21368_592754187422806_1110636153_n.jpg)
Here's what they have to say after conservatives on their page said that this goes too farQuoteAnd they are still taking it too far by demanding the man their son tried to kill be imprisoned. When they admit Zimmerman was merely defending himself, then and only then do they deserve any sympathy.
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/liberal-logic-101-456.jpg
This particular one is stupid and rage inducing even for liberal logic
That one is just fucking heinous >:(
Ms. Fulton and Mr. Martin have been nothing but gracious, pleading for peace and justice. They are Christians of the non-fundie type, and actually follow the tenets of forgiveness. This vicious crap from LL is really beggin' for an Anon DOS smack-down of the site.
the only weapon used was the gun it was all physical and Travyon threw only one punch
She stated that the media blew it out of proportion and that (her words, not mine) Martin was actually much taller than Zimmerman,
Zimmerman insisted on following Martin because he never saw the kid before & there was a string of robberies in the area,
during the scuffle Martin bashed Zimmerman's head on a rock & left a gruesome wound (which mom claimed she saw the photo & it was gross but I later looked it up and only saw that unremarkable surveillance pic)
& that the shooting was a split-second self-defense thing.
Indeed it is. There's a facebook and a tumblr.
I don't understand how someone could be against abortion and condoms/emergency contraceptives at the same time.
Stating just the facts here, based on what I've read. Please correct me if I have anything wrong.She stated that the media blew it out of proportion and that (her words, not mine) Martin was actually much taller than Zimmerman,
Zimmerman is around 5'7" and weighed roughly 185 at the time of the incident, while Trayvon was 5'11" and 158lbs. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin#Parties_involved)QuoteZimmerman insisted on following Martin because he never saw the kid before & there was a string of robberies in the area,
Those are the reasons he gave, yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin#Shooting_and_investigationQuoteduring the scuffle Martin bashed Zimmerman's head on a rock & left a gruesome wound (which mom claimed she saw the photo & it was gross but I later looked it up and only saw that unremarkable surveillance pic)
Based on witness accounts and photos entered into evidence, it appears that Martin initially started running away until Zimmerman lost sight of him. At some point after Zimmerman's 911 call ended, Trayvon jumped on top of Zimmerman, threw at least one punch, and knocked Zimmerman's head on the concrete. You can see an image of Zimmerman's injuries here: http://www.amnation.com/vfr/Zimmerman%27s%20head%20wounds.jpg and here: http://a57.foxnews.com/global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/U.S./0/0/zimmerman_wounds2.jpg (some blood and cuts, but not especially gory). The specifics of everything that happened during the physical confrontation (whether or not Trayvon went for the gun, how many punches he threw, etc.) are in dispute.Quote& that the shooting was a split-second self-defense thing.
It's impossible to say what was going on in Zimmerman's head at the time of the shooting.
Other relevant facts:
- Trayvon was on the phone with a friend while being followed, and mentioned it during the conversation. Most of the facts indicate that he likely believed that Zimmerman might be a threat.
- Zimmerman was indirectly told not to follow Trayvon once he started running. He left his vehicle in spite of this, but claims that it was to find a street sign to give his location to the police.
- The trial was focused largely on whether or not Zimmerman believed that his life was in danger during the physical confrontation.
I'm unsure of Florida's laws regarding manslaughter, so I can't say whether or not Zimmerman's actions leading up to the physical confrontation would be relevant to the trial. From a moral perspective, however (and this is where we depart from fact and hit the realm of opinion), I'd say that he should have been convicted of manslaughter for behaving irresponsibly, leading to a death, and spent at least some time in prison for it.
Why should Casey Anthony be so paranoid? All she did was kill her kid. Nancy Grace is pretty powerless to be told. Now Zimmerman on the other hand....
Ironbite-he's gonna have to find a White's only neighborhood and pray no white parent takes his ass out for being Hispanic.
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8tSJ0ILlQV8/UdSkN4x6J9I/AAAAAAAAWHQ/uFvX0BX2pqU/s600/Rall2013-07-03.jpg)
Seeing as a black guy is shot by cops/security every 28 hours and 1/3 black men end up in jail Al sharpton is right.
The more dangerous issue is people trying to multiply America. We've got enough, we don't need more. Not to mention everyone wants to add America to everything. What we need to do is subtract American instead.Seeing as a black guy is shot by cops/security every 28 hours and 1/3 black men end up in jail Al sharpton is right.
STOP TRYING TO DEVIDE AMERICA!
The more dangerous issue is people trying to multiply America. We've got enough, we don't need more. Not to mention everyone wants to add America to everything. What we need to do is subtract American instead.Seeing as a black guy is shot by cops/security every 28 hours and 1/3 black men end up in jail Al sharpton is right.
STOP TRYING TO DEVIDE AMERICA!
The more dangerous issue is people trying to multiply America. We've got enough, we don't need more. Not to mention everyone wants to add America to everything. What we need to do is subtract American instead.Seeing as a black guy is shot by cops/security every 28 hours and 1/3 black men end up in jail Al sharpton is right.
STOP TRYING TO DEVIDE AMERICA!
How about take America's square root?
Most of America equals XL or greater. Shouldn't be that hard.The more dangerous issue is people trying to multiply America. We've got enough, we don't need more. Not to mention everyone wants to add America to everything. What we need to do is subtract American instead.Seeing as a black guy is shot by cops/security every 28 hours and 1/3 black men end up in jail Al sharpton is right.
STOP TRYING TO DEVIDE AMERICA!
How about take America's square root?
No, just make America equal X.
The last one you posted was a poe the onion madeI know, I posted it as a response to the above ones.
Why the hell did you have to show the middle one?That, and why is the hand-holding one bad?
I think the second and third pictures were a response to the first. That is, to first show that gender roles can lead to spousal abuse, and the second that homosexual relationships can be just as happy as heterosexual relationships.Ahh. Still, spoilers, people.
It was a response to to the idea that homosexuality is unnatural but gender roles aren't.Why the hell did you have to show the middle one?That, and why is the hand-holding one bad?
That doesn't excuse posting a battered woman outside of a spoiler.I agree. And, a warning on the spoiler saying what's in it.
(http://www.carlsontoons.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/attackCOLOR.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/eb59c3204b800ce3f85faf8d5c75a46c/tumblr_mpmrb20iAi1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/184d52665f2f3182c7ee8859c7926f95/tumblr_mmtov13j2c1s3o9l6o1_500.jpg)I don't think that one is too horrible. While I'm certain they don't rule the world, I wouldn't say I trust them to put our health before the money. Why cure things like cancer and AIDS when perpetual treatment is so much more lucrative?
It's insinuating that the companies purposely make people sicker. Which is veering into CT territory too much for me.Ahh, yeah, I doubt they're poisoning us. I doubt they want to cure us, but I doubt they want to make us worse. They just want to keep treating us indefinitely.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/184d52665f2f3182c7ee8859c7926f95/tumblr_mmtov13j2c1s3o9l6o1_500.jpg)
It's insinuating that the companies purposely make people sicker. Which is veering into CT territory too much for me.That's the plot of Oryx and Crake! Which, of course, is fiction.
Just when you thought they couldn't get any worse:
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/1a29b406a6a9ec24cb049a1c17314a4f/tumblr_mq705dhsbh1riy75so1_500.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/184d52665f2f3182c7ee8859c7926f95/tumblr_mmtov13j2c1s3o9l6o1_500.jpg)A perfect example of the Over-complication conspiracist, you take a fact of life (Drug companies can be cruel SOBs very often) and make it seem like it's all part of some secret conspiracy run by some vast system of corporations.
Whatever you do, don't look up Gary Mcoy.Just when you thought they couldn't get any worse:
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/1a29b406a6a9ec24cb049a1c17314a4f/tumblr_mq705dhsbh1riy75so1_500.jpg)
Jesus H Motherfucking Christ, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THOSE INSANE FAR-RIGHT WACKO NUTS' BRAINS? I mean, seriously, how the FUCK does that make any sense? How do these lunatics have ANY sympathetic and/or supportive readers? Holy Shit!
Also, that Liberal Rape Kit with the Understanding Your Rapist pamphlet was literally the most repulsive thing I've ever seen. Glenn McCoy may actually be even more batshit insane than Glenn Beck.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/1a29b406a6a9ec24cb049a1c17314a4f/tumblr_mq705dhsbh1riy75so1_500.jpg)The KKK dress was specifically created as a way to show one was dedicated to a violent and militaristic hate-group.
Also, just because you see a dude wearing a KKK outfit, it does not give you the right to go all vigilante, stalk & shoot his ass.
Also, just because you see a dude wearing a KKK outfit, it does not give you the right to go all vigilante, stalk & shoot his ass.I AM THE LAW!
(http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/images/si/science-idol-2011/web-UCScalendar-2012-strawman-macleod.jpg)
(http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/images/si/science-idol-2011/web-UCScalendar-2012-strawman-macleod.jpg)
This one could be in Best.
Yes. This is actually rather awesome.(http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/images/si/science-idol-2011/web-UCScalendar-2012-strawman-macleod.jpg)
This one could be in Best.
I agree. This should be in the "Best" section.
I used it as a response to the above cartoons.Yes. This is actually rather awesome.(http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/images/si/science-idol-2011/web-UCScalendar-2012-strawman-macleod.jpg)
This one could be in Best.
I agree. This should be in the "Best" section.
Because two threatening men trapping you in an alley is totally analogous to a black teenager passing you on the sidewalk.Don't you know, they can run 20 MPH, have 2 inch long claws, have 52 large serrated teeth, as well as a 3CM thick hide!
That cartoon makes the maker look like an even bigger jackass than intended. Not only is it racist, it's one of those people that thinks all rotties are dangerous. Double fuck you, bitch.
That cartoon makes the maker look like an even bigger jackass than intended. Not only is it racist, it's one of those people that thinks all rotties are dangerous. Double fuck you, bitch.
That cartoon makes the maker look like an even bigger jackass than intended. Not only is it racist, it's one of those people that thinks all rotties are dangerous. Double fuck you, bitch.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ilzjH4YCmQI/UfGwLqaS6-I/AAAAAAAAWUE/Obgfn3lzuJM/s1600/Oliphant2013-07-25.gif)
C'mon, you're suppose to put SOME effort into concealing your racism is political cartoons!
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ilzjH4YCmQI/UfGwLqaS6-I/AAAAAAAAWUE/Obgfn3lzuJM/s1600/Oliphant2013-07-25.gif)
(click to show/hide)
DOBERDOG!(click to show/hide)
Dobermans are so sleek & gorgeous!
Have some racism:
*SNIP*
Have some racism:
*SNIP*
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ilzjH4YCmQI/UfGwLqaS6-I/AAAAAAAAWUE/Obgfn3lzuJM/s1600/Oliphant2013-07-25.gif)I posted this on Facebook with my own remarks. A friend responded with this:
C'mon, you're suppose to put SOME effort into concealing your racism is political cartoons!
Sure, go ahead and profile them. But then call animal control and follow their instructions rather than just shooting them before they've done anything to hurt you.
I believe that is brilliant.(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ilzjH4YCmQI/UfGwLqaS6-I/AAAAAAAAWUE/Obgfn3lzuJM/s1600/Oliphant2013-07-25.gif)I posted this on Facebook with my own remarks. A friend responded with this:
C'mon, you're suppose to put SOME effort into concealing your racism is political cartoons!QuoteSure, go ahead and profile them. But then call animal control and follow their instructions rather than just shooting them before they've done anything to hurt you.
Have some racism:
(http://i42.tinypic.com/2n711d3.jpg)
(http://www.teapartytribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/40.jpg)
So is this saying that the NRA killed those people?
'Cus I'm pretty sure the person openly carrying a large rifle while walking away from the crime-scene is responsible and not that unarmedJewHippieLiberal.
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
The freaking Great Depression and the rise of the mafia.
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
FAIL. Just go to the graph's home at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/listening_to_the_latest_media.html
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
FAIL. Just go to the graph's home at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/listening_to_the_latest_media.html
what did i just read? the guy says "no cherry picking." then proceeds to break down murder rates by states and compare em to france... of course new hampshire has less murders per 100k people than france. there's not 65m people in new hampshire is there? and new hampshire is 1/50th of the USA. i suck at math and demographics, but man, this is wrong and wronger!
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
FAIL. Just go to the graph's home at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/listening_to_the_latest_media.html
what did i just read? the guy says "no cherry picking." then proceeds to break down murder rates by states and compare em to france... of course new hampshire has less murders per 100k people than france. there's not 65m people in new hampshire is there? and new hampshire is 1/50th of the USA. i suck at math and demographics, but man, this is wrong and wronger!
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
FAIL. Just go to the graph's home at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/listening_to_the_latest_media.html
what did i just read? the guy says "no cherry picking." then proceeds to break down murder rates by states and compare em to france... of course new hampshire has less murders per 100k people than france. there's not 65m people in new hampshire is there? and new hampshire is 1/50th of the USA. i suck at math and demographics, but man, this is wrong and wronger!
No, that's not true. New Hampshire could well have a lower murder rate per capita than France and this would be meaningful data, irrespective of the difference in population between New Hampshire and France. I will grant that only looking at New Hampshire, rather than the whole of the United States, could be construed as cherry picking, but there actually is a good reason to do something like that. Basically, it comes down to this: murder rates in inner cities are astronomical (I remember hearing that Detroit's murder rate is comparable to Somalia's), while murder rates in less urban areas are much lower, often being comparable to those of, say, Belgium or Canada. We have reason to believe that this disparity is due to the War on Drugs (which I'll bet the writer of the original article is completely in favor of), to the point where about 50% of gun violence may stem from drug-related gang warfare. This also shows that a culture of gun ownership does not necessarily lead to blood in the streets (though even I think that a gun-to-person ratio of .9 may be excessive).
Keep in mind that most gun related deaths are suicides.
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
FAIL. Just go to the graph's home at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/listening_to_the_latest_media.html
what did i just read? the guy says "no cherry picking." then proceeds to break down murder rates by states and compare em to france... of course new hampshire has less murders per 100k people than france. there's not 65m people in new hampshire is there? and new hampshire is 1/50th of the USA. i suck at math and demographics, but man, this is wrong and wronger!
What the hell was going on in the 30s?
FAIL. Just go to the graph's home at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/listening_to_the_latest_media.html
what did i just read? the guy says "no cherry picking." then proceeds to break down murder rates by states and compare em to france... of course new hampshire has less murders per 100k people than france. there's not 65m people in new hampshire is there? and new hampshire is 1/50th of the USA. i suck at math and demographics, but man, this is wrong and wronger!
No, that's not true. New Hampshire could well have a lower murder rate per capita than France and this would be meaningful data, irrespective of the difference in population between New Hampshire and France. I will grant that only looking at New Hampshire, rather than the whole of the United States, could be construed as cherry picking, but there actually is a good reason to do something like that. Basically, it comes down to this: murder rates in inner cities are astronomical (I remember hearing that Detroit's murder rate is comparable to Somalia's), while murder rates in less urban areas are much lower, often being comparable to those of, say, Belgium or Canada. We have reason to believe that this disparity is due to the War on Drugs (which I'll bet the writer of the original article is completely in favor of), to the point where about 50% of gun violence may stem from drug-related gang warfare. This also shows that a culture of gun ownership does not necessarily lead to blood in the streets (though even I think that a gun-to-person ratio of .9 may be excessive).
Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
Nah, I understand it. People 237 years ago were, well, fucking idiots. Plus, their guns took several minutes if you wanted to fire a second shot. I have a feeling they didn't quite expect modern guns. Let's be conservative and say you could fire once per minute. That's one bullet per 60 seconds. Let's take a modern assault rifle with thirty rounds. Let's say, six seconds? That's thirty times as many bullets in a tenth of the time.Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
Nah, I understand it. People 237 years ago were, well, fucking idiots. Plus, their guns took several minutes if you wanted to fire a second shot. I have a feeling they didn't quite expect modern guns. Let's be conservative and say you could fire once per minute. That's one bullet per 60 seconds. Let's take a modern assault rifle with thirty rounds. Let's say, six seconds? That's thirty times as many bullets in a tenth of the time.Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
Nah, I understand it. People 237 years ago were, well, fucking idiots. Plus, their guns took several minutes if you wanted to fire a second shot. I have a feeling they didn't quite expect modern guns. Let's be conservative and say you could fire once per minute. That's one bullet per 60 seconds. Let's take a modern assault rifle with thirty rounds. Let's say, six seconds? That's thirty times as many bullets in a tenth of the time.Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
Actually, it has tons of bearing. They couldn't have known how important health care would become. It was pretty much pray and hope you don't die. There's no point in funding that. However, if they knew we'd be able to save millions with national health care, they'd likely want universal health care.Nah, I understand it. People 237 years ago were, well, fucking idiots. Plus, their guns took several minutes if you wanted to fire a second shot. I have a feeling they didn't quite expect modern guns. Let's be conservative and say you could fire once per minute. That's one bullet per 60 seconds. Let's take a modern assault rifle with thirty rounds. Let's say, six seconds? That's thirty times as many bullets in a tenth of the time.Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
Without dragging this into a gun debate, and this will likely be the last I have to say on this matter (for now, at least), I fail to see how them not being able to see how fast and far weapons technology would advance over more than two centuries has any bearing on the argument for/against gun control and the 2nd Amendment. They couldn't have foreseen how far medicine has advanced, either, but that, like this, would have zero bearing on an argument for/against nationalized health care.
Okay, going with a skilled shooter, three shots every sixty seconds vs. an unskilled moron doing ten times as many in a tenth of the time.Nah, I understand it. People 237 years ago were, well, fucking idiots. Plus, their guns took several minutes if you wanted to fire a second shot. I have a feeling they didn't quite expect modern guns. Let's be conservative and say you could fire once per minute. That's one bullet per 60 seconds. Let's take a modern assault rifle with thirty rounds. Let's say, six seconds? That's thirty times as many bullets in a tenth of the time.Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
Nitpick: A skilled shooter with an 18th-century musket such as used in the Revolution could load, aim and fire three shots a minute. Still significantly slower than modern weapons, but significantly faster than what you were suggesting as the average.
I know I said the last post was the last I'd say on this topic, but I feel the need to clarify one final thing: I'm not saying everyone should have access to guns all the time. I support well-reasoned, well-enforced regulations on gun ownership including background checks, psychological checks, waiting periods, and reasonable restrictions on what a civilian can purchase. I think, if you can prove that you can use a gun safely and are not a known, violent criminal or someone whose mental health is in serious question, then you should be able to acquire, for instance, a Colt M1911 or R700, but not a CAR-15 or AK-47.
I think we all know you need to become the Postal Dude from Postal and wipe out your town.I know I said the last post was the last I'd say on this topic, but I feel the need to clarify one final thing: I'm not saying everyone should have access to guns all the time. I support well-reasoned, well-enforced regulations on gun ownership including background checks, psychological checks, waiting periods, and reasonable restrictions on what a civilian can purchase. I think, if you can prove that you can use a gun safely and are not a known, violent criminal or someone whose mental health is in serious question, then you should be able to acquire, for instance, a Colt M1911 or R700, but not a CAR-15 or AK-47.
You realize a 1911 would pose far more danger than an AK, right? Second, due to recent events in my area, I think I damn well need quite a few guns. I'll be making a thread later, but the long story short if that I'm dealing with people with the mentality about like that of the character Vaas from Farcry 3, and potentially in bed with the local law enforcement.
I don't have a horse in the gun control race (As in, I think that people should be allowed to have gun, but that it should be significantly more controled than say, getting the right to drive a car, but since I live in europe, who cares), but...Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
I don't have a horse in the gun control race (As in, I think that people should be allowed to have gun, but that it should be significantly more controled than say, getting the right to drive a car, but since I live in europe, who cares), but...I like you already.
You're aware that a lot of countries do change their core texts sometimes, right? As in, France for example is now well into its 5th constitution (and people are starting to think that a 6th would be a good idea), and it's doesn't look like it has changed into a draconnian hellhole because of that...
I find this veneration for old texts a bit unsettling, really...
I don't have a horse in the gun control race (As in, I think that people should be allowed to have gun, but that it should be significantly more controled than say, getting the right to drive a car, but since I live in europe, who cares), but...Is it possible that part of the reason for the severe gang violence in the US is the ready availability of legal guns?
While possible, there are many other contributing factors that we could fix without either amending or circumventing the Constitution, like poverty, discrimination, and access to quality education.
Also, just something political that annoys the fuck outta me: people, typically non-Americans, that say we should just ignore the 2nd Amendment because it "was made by some old fuckers over 200 years ago." Yes, let's ignore what is essentially the founding legal document of our entire nation, the one that outlines our rights and our most fundamental laws as a society. Not to mention that the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, what's considered the very core of our nation's being. Yes, just ignore it and impose draconian, no-guns-at-all legislation, because the Constitution is over 200 years-old. That will end well.
You're aware that a lot of countries do change their core texts sometimes, right? As in, France for example is now well into its 5th constitution (and people are starting to think that a 6th would be a good idea), and it's doesn't look like it has changed into a draconnian hellhole because of that...
I find this veneration for old texts a bit unsettling, really...
I find this veneration for old texts a bit unsettling, really...
Not sure if it belongs here, but the base pic is recognizable.
(http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/583/899/895.jpg)
It's actually a character from recently popular manga/anime Attack on Titan, named Annie Leonhart. One of her most prominent features is her nose, whichNot sure if it belongs here, but the base pic is recognizable.
(http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/583/899/895.jpg)
It looks a racist re-draw of one of the characters from Hetalia. But I could be wrong.
(http://i44.tinypic.com/svq6ax.jpg)
Let's play a game of "spot all of the flaws in this asshole's argument".
(http://i44.tinypic.com/svq6ax.jpg)But they had homosexuality in feudal Japan, right? Among manly men too.
Let's play a game of "spot all of the flaws in this asshole's argument".
(http://i44.tinypic.com/svq6ax.jpg)
Let's play a game of "spot all of the flaws in this asshole's argument".
Who was it that was on the forums who had a raging hate-on for the Japanese (well, anime/manga)? I swear we had one.
Who was it that was on the forums who had a raging hate-on for the Japanese (well, anime/manga)? I swear we had one.
Georgebullocks had a thing about anime and made some shitty comments about the tsunami
Both of those things, plus:
- Thinks old Hollywood movies are a valid source for Japanese history.
- Most pictures on the left are white actors in yellowface.
- Failure to realize that different cultures associate different traits with masculinity.
- Thinks certain clothing and hair styles = homosexuality.
- Thinks Jews somehow have control over Japanese cultural trends.
- Racism.
And there's probably other stuff I'm too tired to notice.
Both of those things, plus:
- Thinks old Hollywood movies are a valid source for Japanese history.
- Most pictures on the left are white actors in yellowface.
- Failure to realize that different cultures associate different traits with masculinity.
- Thinks certain clothing and hair styles = homosexuality.
- Thinks Jews somehow have control over Japanese cultural trends.
- Racism.
And there's probably other stuff I'm too tired to notice.
Yellowface? You sure?
Ironbite-because those guys pretty much are the norm for any Japanese actor in this day and age.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/58787d8ae91a19276ec3987b10bd988e/tumblr_momiukOkRI1r53swio1_500.jpg)
There are several differences.
Who started it.
The nature of the "names."
Who's doing more actual damage.
Etc.
(http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/853/7fu8.jpg)
That picture would be pretty badass without the racism.Meh, it's okay.
Now, we need a response comic called "During Eden," and it'll just be 10 pages of Adam tediously naming EVERY ANIMAL EVER. I think I'll take life after Eden for 500, Alex.
(http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/853/7fu8.jpg)
"Anti-white" is pretty half-arsed in his assault on "white". Also, what the hell is the shield a metaphor for?
Also, in what sense is your arse-backwards, dumb-fucking-hick society* anything remotely like the Greek one? For all the nasty things the Greeks did, they weren't a bunch of racists like you fuckwits.
* For those who may be confused, I'm not talking about American society or even hick society (which is not universally racist). I mean fuckwit society.
Romans were pretty racist, too.
Would I be wrong in assuming that most nations of the Greek and Roman time periods were racist?
Romans were pretty racist, too.
Would I be wrong in assuming that most nations of the Greek and Roman time periods were racist?
You're adorable if you think that.
Ironbite-it's about 500,000,000 years old actually.
I do. Racism has been around FOR ALL OF HISTORY! As long as people can look at people who look different then their group and say they hate them for their differences, there has been racism.
Ironbite-how that didn't penetrate your skull surprises me but then I remember who I'm talking to.
Romans were pretty racist, too.
Would I be wrong in assuming that most nations of the Greek and Roman time periods were racist?
Racism is about 500 years old. It's quite an enlightenment concept, actually. Read some Theodore W. Allen.
I do. Racism has been around FOR ALL OF HISTORY! As long as people can look at people who look different then their group and say they hate them for their differences, there has been racism.
Ironbite-how that didn't penetrate your skull surprises me but then I remember who I'm talking to.
Needless to say, my position has far more academic support than yours. Read a book.
Romans were pretty racist, too.
Would I be wrong in assuming that most nations of the Greek and Roman time periods were racist?
Racism is about 500 years old. It's quite an enlightenment concept, actually. Read some Theodore W. Allen.
You mean the guy who wrote the book "The Invention of the White Race"? The same guy who doesn't look further before the Antebellum era? The same guy who isn't an anthropologist? The same guy who isn't an archaeologist? The same guy with no education concerning the time before the Revolutionary War?
He was a writer by trade. He had no formal education in the topics that matter. So no, you don't have any academic support for your position.
I do. Racism has been around FOR ALL OF HISTORY! As long as people can look at people who look different then their group and say they hate them for their differences, there has been racism.
Ironbite-how that didn't penetrate your skull surprises me but then I remember who I'm talking to.
Needless to say, my position has far more academic support than yours. Read a book.
I find that 99% of the time, when someone says something doesn't need to be said, but says it anyway, they know they're on shaky ground at best. I find the same thing applies when people cite "common sense".
And no, this isn't a refutation or argument against your inane sputtering about "REAL racism". Just something I found interesting.
OH CAN I ANSWER!?
Here's my question to you, Fred.
What have you done to earn our respect?
OH CAN I ANSWER!?
No.
Here's my question to you, Fred.
What have you done to earn our respect?
Well isn't THAT a loaded question. What have you done to earn mine?
OH CAN I ANSWER!?
No.
Then fuck you dragon boy!
Here's my question to you, Fred.
What have you done to earn our respect?
Well isn't THAT a loaded question. What have you done to earn mine?
You're the one demanding that we automatically respect what you have to say.
A flat out lie.
Actually racism has only been around since 1936. Perhaps you are thinking of racialism which is much older. It started way back in 1907.
Of course, if you want to ignore specific words and just look at the whole "us vs. them (those dirty unwashed savages)" concept I'm sure i could find quite a few quotes from the bible which was written a good deal more than 500 years ago.
Generally when we say racism has been around since the beginning of time we aren't talking about the word, but the concept.
Generally when we say racism has been around since the beginning of time we aren't talking about the word, but the concept.
Bigotry is human, absolutely. Xenophobia is inherent, sure. Racism is a much more specific type of bigotry than just xenophobia- racism hatred of a person because of the colour of their skin alone and not as a signifier of nationality. The Romans discriminated against white foreigners and black foreigners equally. If you were born in Rome and you were black, you were a full citizen. Hatred of people because of their "race" is about 500 years old, about as old as racialised slavery and new-world colonialism.
Generally when we say racism has been around since the beginning of time we aren't talking about the word, but the concept.
Bigotry is human, absolutely. Xenophobia is inherent, sure. Racism is a much more specific type of bigotry than just xenophobia- racism hatred of a person because of the colour of their skin alone and not as a signifier of nationality. The Romans discriminated against white foreigners and black foreigners equally. If you were born in Rome and you were black, you were a full citizen. Hatred of people because of their "race" is about 500 years old, about as old as racialised slavery and new-world colonialism.
And we're the male child of a Roman Citizen or Freedman
No my point was more that simply being born in Rome wasn't enough. You had to be the child of a Roman Citizen to get the citizenship. Indeed as the empire expanded actually being born in Rome was neither necessary nor sufficient. Plenty of Emperors were never born in Rome.
(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)
Who is "Transgender Jane" supposed to be?
If anything, I think it's WORSE now. Notice how they didn't feel the need to label fucking everything?
Meanwhile, in the land of bullshit comparisons....
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/21d1fe84a0bc2023fca0e9a051614a6a/tumblr_mr6sy3k5Zk1rv09a7o1_500.jpg)
Meanwhile, in the land of bullshit comparisons....
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/21d1fe84a0bc2023fca0e9a051614a6a/tumblr_mr6sy3k5Zk1rv09a7o1_500.jpg)
(http://rlv.zcache.com/native_american_immigration_mousepad-r35d75c6c19b544d8aa7596115d9a537e_x74vi_8byvr_324.jpg)
Because impoverished foreigners hopping the border and the government passing a handful of gun laws are totally the same thing as a powerful colonialist empire stealing your land, attempting to wipe out your culture and completely disarming you so you'll be defenseless against persecution.
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Agreed. It's like, two things in the world that should never be able to be homophobic: bronies/pegasisters and Rammstein fans. But nope.My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
They should make that character gay in the show, just so we can see the homophobic brony/pegasister reactions.
Agreed. It's like, two things in the world that should never be able to be homophobic: bronies/pegasisters and Rammstein fans. But nope.My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
They should make that character gay in the show, just so we can see the homophobic brony/pegasister reactions.
I"m sorry WWF? World Wildlife Fund?
Ironbite-I think you mean the WWE.
I"m sorry WWF? World Wildlife Fund?Meh. No matter how long it goes, the first thought people will have with WWF is wrestling, not pandas.
Ironbite-I think you mean the WWE.
Not according to the lawsuit.Lol. Part of me hopes the World Wildlife Fund fails for this.
Ironbite-btw...we owe the WWF a quarter each now.
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
*coughs* Mankind vs. Panda in a cage match for the title.I"m sorry WWF? World Wildlife Fund?Meh. No matter how long it goes, the first thought people will have with WWF is wrestling, not pandas.
Ironbite-I think you mean the WWE.
I"m sorry WWF? World Wildlife Fund?
Ironbite-I think you mean the WWE.
Yes... I did. I mistakenly thought it was the World Wrestling Federation :-[
The funny thing is I specifically added the word wrestling, so that there wouldn't be any confusion with the World Wildlife Fund. Looks like I failed there ::)
I"m sorry WWF? World Wildlife Fund?
Ironbite-I think you mean the WWE.
Yes... I did. I mistakenly thought it was the World Wrestling Federation :-[
The funny thing is I specifically added the word wrestling, so that there wouldn't be any confusion with the World Wildlife Fund. Looks like I failed there ::)
no, you didn't fail. You just irked our resident pro-wrastlin' fan...
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Why couldn't a feminist enjoy max hardcore porno?
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Why couldn't a feminist enjoy max hardcore porno?
Google Max Hardcore. He's gross.
My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Why couldn't a feminist enjoy max hardcore porno?
Google Max Hardcore. He's gross.
Googled and he is. I thought you were just talking about hardcore porn in general.
I think that the best solution for the WWF issue would be for the World Wildlife Fund and the World Wrestling Federation to merge.
"The WWF: the environmental advocacy group with REAL muscle"
I agree with everything you said, but I want to address this. I haven't seen anything about any enforced method acting while googling him. If they consented (if there's a safe word, as there should be in BDSM, not using it is consenting), it's fine with me. He may be personally a prick, but so long as it's consensual, I really don't give a fuck. Additionally, he was put in prison for years for goddamn obscenity charges. So yeah, that pisses me off, because that's fucking bullshit.My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Why couldn't a feminist enjoy max hardcore porno?
Google Max Hardcore. He's gross.
Googled and he is. I thought you were just talking about hardcore porn in general.
Nope, just sadistic, sexist trash like Max Hardcore & another like him, Khan Tusion ('Contusion', get it?). I'm very sex-positive and not anti-porn but there are some elements of porn that irk me big time. I know some are Dom/sub fantasies and some folks enjoy & consent to being pummeled (or worse) but these types tend to use deception & they don't give a hoot about the actresses feelings, safety, limits or expectations. "Method Acting"? More like "Assault".
So, to recap, in the Land of the Free: if you're an adult who produces a film using other consenting adults, for the entertainment of still other consenting adults, which merely depicts fictional acts of humiliation and degradation, the DOJ will prosecute you and send you to prison for years. The claim that no real pain was inflicted will be rejected; mere humiliation is enough to make you a criminal. But if government officials actually subject helpless detainees in their custody to extreme mental abuse, degradation, humiliation and even mock executions long considered "torture" in the entire civilized world, the DOJ will argue that they have acted with perfect legality and, just to be sure, Congress will hand them retroactive immunity for their conduct. That's how we prioritize criminality and arrange our value system.
I agree with everything you said, but I want to address this. I haven't seen anything about any enforced method acting while googling him. If they consented (if there's a safe word, as there should be in BDSM, not using it is consenting), it's fine with me. He may be personally a prick, but so long as it's consensual, I really don't give a fuck. Additionally, he was put in prison for years for goddamn obscenity charges. So yeah, that pisses me off, because that's fucking bullshit.My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Why couldn't a feminist enjoy max hardcore porno?
Google Max Hardcore. He's gross.
Googled and he is. I thought you were just talking about hardcore porn in general.
Nope, just sadistic, sexist trash like Max Hardcore & another like him, Khan Tusion ('Contusion', get it?). I'm very sex-positive and not anti-porn but there are some elements of porn that irk me big time. I know some are Dom/sub fantasies and some folks enjoy & consent to being pummeled (or worse) but these types tend to use deception & they don't give a hoot about the actresses feelings, safety, limits or expectations. "Method Acting"? More like "Assault".
Glenn Greenwald put it best:QuoteSo, to recap, in the Land of the Free: if you're an adult who produces a film using other consenting adults, for the entertainment of still other consenting adults, which merely depicts fictional acts of humiliation and degradation, the DOJ will prosecute you and send you to prison for years. The claim that no real pain was inflicted will be rejected; mere humiliation is enough to make you a criminal. But if government officials actually subject helpless detainees in their custody to extreme mental abuse, degradation, humiliation and even mock executions long considered "torture" in the entire civilized world, the DOJ will argue that they have acted with perfect legality and, just to be sure, Congress will hand them retroactive immunity for their conduct. That's how we prioritize criminality and arrange our value system.
Read this. (http://boingboing.net/2008/10/07/adult-film-director.html) Even if his porn isn't for you, as people who support free speech, this still should be an issue.
Yeah, to me, BDSM is fine (well, I am in a BDSM-filled relationship, so duuuuuh). He was never, ever tried for rape, which means it's unlikely that he actually did anything wrong, which makes him going to jail horrible.I agree with everything you said, but I want to address this. I haven't seen anything about any enforced method acting while googling him. If they consented (if there's a safe word, as there should be in BDSM, not using it is consenting), it's fine with me. He may be personally a prick, but so long as it's consensual, I really don't give a fuck. Additionally, he was put in prison for years for goddamn obscenity charges. So yeah, that pisses me off, because that's fucking bullshit.My Little Pony: Homophobia is Magic(click to show/hide)
Yes because there no better spokes critter to speak against "gayness' then the toy equine equivalent of a drag queen diva.
Purple glitter hair? Oh yeah, nothing FABULOUSLY GAY! about that.
(did I lay the sarcasm on thick enough or does it need another layer?)
Or Rainbow Dash for her tomboyish spunk & rainbow-ness.
I never could figure out why anyone of the homophobic/misogynist persuasion would be remotely interested in MLP! It's like a psychedelic peace activist Flowerkid who totally jizzes his pants for that stupid John Wayne cinematic propaganda-fest The Green Berets.
Or feminists who enjoy Max Hardcore porno flicks....or the NAACP supporting the KKK....IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Why couldn't a feminist enjoy max hardcore porno?
Google Max Hardcore. He's gross.
Googled and he is. I thought you were just talking about hardcore porn in general.
Nope, just sadistic, sexist trash like Max Hardcore & another like him, Khan Tusion ('Contusion', get it?). I'm very sex-positive and not anti-porn but there are some elements of porn that irk me big time. I know some are Dom/sub fantasies and some folks enjoy & consent to being pummeled (or worse) but these types tend to use deception & they don't give a hoot about the actresses feelings, safety, limits or expectations. "Method Acting"? More like "Assault".
Glenn Greenwald put it best:QuoteSo, to recap, in the Land of the Free: if you're an adult who produces a film using other consenting adults, for the entertainment of still other consenting adults, which merely depicts fictional acts of humiliation and degradation, the DOJ will prosecute you and send you to prison for years. The claim that no real pain was inflicted will be rejected; mere humiliation is enough to make you a criminal. But if government officials actually subject helpless detainees in their custody to extreme mental abuse, degradation, humiliation and even mock executions long considered "torture" in the entire civilized world, the DOJ will argue that they have acted with perfect legality and, just to be sure, Congress will hand them retroactive immunity for their conduct. That's how we prioritize criminality and arrange our value system.
Read this. (http://boingboing.net/2008/10/07/adult-film-director.html) Even if his porn isn't for you, as people who support free speech, this still should be an issue.
As for enforced method acting, I remember reading about telling women he was going to do one thing then do something else even worse & that one lady had to go to the hospital.
I could have been just reading rumors but I don't know. That said, if everything on-screen was 100% consensual & pure acting then, yes, it's wrong that he was jailed a lot.
I guess the whole "violent porn" sub-genre, as repulsive as it seems, has a right to exist & may even be a positive outlet for a guy who came from a bad break up rather than him going out and raping everybody. Some say that since violent, rapey Hentai became big, sex crimes in Japan dropped. Only a super-psychopath would be inspired by this stuff & act on it.
I know this is going to inspire much debate which may derail this thread. I hope I didn't open a can of worms. :o
Now, on with the next super-crappy editorial cartoon!
He was never, ever tried for rape, which means it's unlikely that he actually did anything wrong
You raise good points about the lack of charges. That said, I see all porn that isn't child porn as equally fine, even if it's simulated child porn.
Agreed. I don't like shit or puke or piss, but I think it's fine. I don't consider legit unwilling stuff okay.You raise good points about the lack of charges. That said, I see all porn that isn't child porn as equally fine, even if it's simulated child porn.
I'd also point out snuff (non-simulated) and other types of sex crimes that have been filmed as porn. If it's simulated and the actors are there willingly (and adults, duh.) then I have no problem with porn. That is to say that I have no problems with it existing. I personally will not watch stuff like, let's say anything that includes excrement etc.
But just because I don't like it is not a reason to ban it.
planetthorburn.tumblr.comGood job, cartoonist. It's not like these programs started under Bush, nope. Of course that doesn't excuse Obama for continuing, and in some cases expanding those programs.
This guy is cuckoo
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ebb7d0e12ce796183259fe589bd1ed15/tumblr_movhbvEhEj1qze542o1_500.jpg) Um the ACLU is angry at PRISM
planetthorburn.tumblr.com
This guy is cuckoo
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ebb7d0e12ce796183259fe589bd1ed15/tumblr_movhbvEhEj1qze542o1_500.jpg) Um the ACLU is angry at PRISM
planetthorburn.tumblr.comGood job, cartoonist. It's not like these programs started under Bush, nope. Of course that doesn't excuse Obama for continuing, and in some cases expanding those programs.
This guy is cuckoo
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ebb7d0e12ce796183259fe589bd1ed15/tumblr_movhbvEhEj1qze542o1_500.jpg) Um the ACLU is angry at PRISM
I don't suppose you have a link to the original? I can't find it.
Good grief.
{Charlie Brown comic strips}
Good grief.
(http://www.bookwormroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/FW-TWISTED-THINKING-Dixon-Diazs-cartoons-are-incisive-bookwormroom@gmail.com-Gmail-Mozilla-Firefox-3312013-103845-AM.bmp.jpg)
I'm gonna take a stab at it and say it's implying Obama is Netanyahu's bitch. Or something.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/f000de0e4f8925e5585af97ec19c3399/tumblr_mqtu0w4Hg41rwo44fo1_400.jpg)
What the hell am I looking at?
I'm gonna take a stab at it and say it's implying Obama is Netanyahu's bitch. Or something.
But I thought that Obama was an Israel hating crypto-muslim
Only if you are a typical conservative. If you're an anti-Semite, then he worships Israel.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/f000de0e4f8925e5585af97ec19c3399/tumblr_mqtu0w4Hg41rwo44fo1_400.jpg)
What the hell am I looking at?
I'm trying to figure out WTF costume designers have to do with anything. (It's "customers," you ignorant racist fuck. Learn 2 English.)
Okay, what the hell, Liberal Logic 101?Haven't heard the first two, and the last one is so fucking childish I laughed.
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2667 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2667)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2662 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2662)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2644 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2644)
Okay, what the hell, Liberal Logic 101?
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2667 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2667)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2662 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2662)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2644 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2644)
Okay, what the hell, Liberal Logic 101?
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2667 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2667)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2662 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2662)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2644 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2644)
The first one is fucking ridiculous because it has no real point. Yeah, okay, they're both mixed race and...? Or are we blaming it on the father in this particular instance?
Number two is just as ridiculous because they're still harping on the birth certificate thing which got old five years ago.
The third one made me actually laugh at loud if not for the fact that they used the word 'dork' but in the fact that they still believe none of their "own" presidents did drugs and the whole Michelle Obama thing is half as old as the birth certificate thing.
I swear to God, that site just HAS to be a satire of what conservatives think liberals are like. It simply is not possible for people to truly be that ignorant. I refuse to even consider that as a legitimate possibility. It just HAS to be satire!Think of it in a manner of "turtles all the way down." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down) Now you might ask the question of, "Where is the bottom?" The answer is that there is no bottom! Willful ignorance is self sustaining.
Just because Charles Schulz is dead doesn't mean that you should use his characters to showcase your ignorance and racism.No one is safe, nothing is sacred.
And I refuse to unblock Liberal Logic's crap in Adblock.I unblocked them to see it. Perhaps we could start uploading all their stuff to Imgur, to host it and give them no cash.
you would still need to give them one hit.True, but in the long run, that's the better of two evils.
Biography of Evangelist Tim Todd
Taking the whole gospel to the whole world before Jesus comes!
Who is Tim Todd and what is so special about the ministry of Revival Fires International headquartered in West Monroe, LA? In each generation, God seems to raise up special men and women to whom He gives the opportunity to be used in a mighty way. Tim is such a man. In his heart there burns a desire to reach every man, woman, young person and child on the face of the earth with the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ.
Tim has a special message for the church during this end-time revival. He conducts special services where God's Word is preached under the anointing of the Holy Ghost. Tim's message is pure gospel, his delivery is dynamic, and his heart is aflame with the power of God.
I think I've found the corniest anti-abortion tract ever. (http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/images/comics/abortion/Abortion.swf)
EDIT: Dear Satan, there's more... (http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/images/comics/)
It doesn't work with ad block
I'm not going on there any more if it means giving them money
Oh good Dragon's Dipshit is doing cartoons now.
The racists love to fondle and abuse miniscule sciency-lookin' factoids into their spew. There's evidence that H. Erectus was the first out-of-Africa human diaspora, with a following wave of early H. Sapiens ages later. Neanderthal's were a climatic era niche species that did not wander far afield because they were weird like that, and probably because they did not like change. They made virtually the exact same style of tools for hundreds of thousands of years with no advancement. I'd rather not talk about that side of my family. They embarrass me. Yet, I can see why the fringe-y racist uber fuckwits lay claim to Neanderthal blood with pride; all that sameness, clannishness, xenophobia, non-existant art, spears-spears-and-more-spears, over and over, just like their great-great-to-the-6th-power grandkids.
I was told this may be better here.
(https://sphotos-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/q71/1209177_521427764612268_948215608_n.jpg)
Though I've heard one of the groups fighting in Syria has ties to al Qaeda.
You know...the group that we're actually backing in this horse race.
Ironbite-it's like they can't even listen.
We're backing Al Nursa?! WHY?!!!!!
It's like the US Government likes to cause discord for funsies! After all that jibjab about fighting IslamoFundieism, we're funding the Fundies!
And Obama's going for this WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH HIM?! IS HE POSSESSED BY POD ALIENS OR STUPID-DEMONS OR SOMETHING?!
Is there anyway we can petition Whitehouse.org to tell Obama "NO"?
Please tell me I'm wrong?! Please tell me I read that wrong?! Please tell me we're backing the Free Syrian Army! YOU'D HAVE TO BE BRAINDEAD TO BACK AL QAEDA! I MEAN, WE KILLED AL QAEDA'S FOUNDER FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!
TIME TO RAISE A STINK ABOUT PRESIDENT NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN PART 2!
We're backing Al Nursa?! WHY?!!!!!
It's like the US Government likes to cause discord for funsies! After all that jibjab about fighting IslamoFundieism, we're funding the Fundies!
And Obama's going for this WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH HIM?! IS HE POSSESSED BY POD ALIENS OR STUPID-DEMONS OR SOMETHING?!
Is there anyway we can petition Whitehouse.org to tell Obama "NO"?
Please tell me I'm wrong?! Please tell me I read that wrong?! Please tell me we're backing the Free Syrian Army! YOU'D HAVE TO BE BRAINDEAD TO BACK AL QAEDA! I MEAN, WE KILLED AL QAEDA'S FOUNDER FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!
TIME TO RAISE A STINK ABOUT PRESIDENT NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN PART 2!
Do me a favor spazzy...LEARN TO FUCKING READ!
We're not backing Al Nursa. We're backing the secular group in the region. You know. The one group that started this whole thing. That group.
Ironbite-jesus you going off like that embarassed me.
You know...the group that we're actually backing in this horse race.
Ironbite-it's like they can't even listen.
Can't listen, or won't?
I assumed that the "they" Ironbite was referring to was the people who made and agree with that image.
I don't expect that hosting the Olympics has much of an influence with turning to totalitarianism. Seems an odd thing to remark.Weird coincidence. I find it odd that history is repeating to such an extent. The president and his wife don't really have an influence either, but it's odd that FDR was the first disabled president and had a very active wife, and Obama's the first black one and has a very active wife.
I don't expect that hosting the Olympics has much of an influence with turning to totalitarianism. Seems an odd thing to remark.Weird coincidence. I find it odd that history is repeating to such an extent. The president and his wife don't really have an influence either, but it's odd that FDR was the first disabled president and had a very active wife, and Obama's the first black one and has a very active wife.
It's not weird on it's own. It's weird when it is tied together with just how much a repeat things are. Formerly great nation in a state of decay. Charismatic leader who is their personal jesus solving all their issues and loves the camera. Militaristic mindset. Heavy discrimination by law against minorities. Global economic downturn. Minority (disabled/black) president in the White House. Socially active first lady. If the Republicans gave a shit about anyone but themselves, I could put a New Deal 2.0 here. That said, the press (in this case, the right wing press, in the past, all of America) praising the camera loving personal jesus.I don't expect that hosting the Olympics has much of an influence with turning to totalitarianism. Seems an odd thing to remark.Weird coincidence. I find it odd that history is repeating to such an extent. The president and his wife don't really have an influence either, but it's odd that FDR was the first disabled president and had a very active wife, and Obama's the first black one and has a very active wife.
Is it that weird? Lot's of countries have hosted the Olympics.
We hosted them last year and apart from the fact that I am typing this from a government internment camp everything is fine and dandy!
I don't expect that hosting the Olympics has much of an influence with turning to totalitarianism. Seems an odd thing to remark.Weird coincidence. I find it odd that history is repeating to such an extent. The president and his wife don't really have an influence either, but it's odd that FDR was the first disabled president and had a very active wife, and Obama's the first black one and has a very active wife.
So to presume that your one-in-64-million chance thing is a miracle, is to significantly underestimate the total number of... things... that there are.
I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the woman in a burqa/hijab/whichever looking like a person in a penis costume.
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/q71/1234219_690752660954241_1836358460_n.jpg)Meh, not too bad a cartoon, but I feel the same about all Abrahamic religions, not just Islam. Christianity is far worse in the death toll, and Israel is currently in the middle of an extermination campaign.
I like how they assume that you support an attack on Syria because you voted for Obama.Maybe those in Congress, though there's a good portion that voted no or are undecided.
I like how they assume that you support an attack on Syria because you voted for Obama.
Hey look guys Liberal Logic 101 is being stupid again.
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2734 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2734)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2705 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2705)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2696 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2696)
http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2675 (http://liberallogic101.com/?p=2675)
Download a screencap program. I use MWSwap. Take a screencap of each, upload to a site like Tinypics, Flikr or Photobucket, then post here.
Download a screencap program. I use MWSwap. Take a screencap of each, upload to a site like Tinypics, Flikr or Photobucket, then post here.
For assorted reasons I do not use any image-sharing sites.
Download a screencap program. I use MWSwap. Take a screencap of each, upload to a site like Tinypics, Flikr or Photobucket, then post here.
For assorted reasons I do not use any image-sharing sites.
What are those assorted reasons?
Wow, that's almost vague enough to make sense as a valid reason!
Wow, that's almost vague enough to make sense as a valid reason!
Suffice it to say that I do not wish to go into any (further) detail.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/e8f17823435fadd2dcc361a49777bca4/tumblr_msn0zyVYvH1s6ayqwo1_1280.jpg)
Well, they aren't exactly fathers are they ::)?
I don't know where to put this, so here:
God-damn muthafuckin' honkies!I don't know where to put this, so here:
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/2972be604b6faafaba12a31749b13aee/tumblr_mhm4nuqsVS1s3r70co1_400.gif)
Yes they are to a little clump of cells ::)(http://24.media.tumblr.com/e8f17823435fadd2dcc361a49777bca4/tumblr_msn0zyVYvH1s6ayqwo1_1280.jpg)
Well, they aren't exactly fathers are they ::)?
There's a whole bunch of shitty things on the Tumblr of The Atheist Antidote. (http://theatheistantidote.tumblr.com/)
(https://scontent-a-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q71/s720x720/1235002_710538828973144_805574888_n.jpg)
They don't. There have been strikes and protests by fast food workers and they're demanding $15/hour.
And yet, we're told 'get a job' as kids, and then bitched at and treated like shit for 'being a burger flipper'.
We can't fuckin' win.
(https://scontent-a-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q71/s720x720/1235002_710538828973144_805574888_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q71/s720x720/1235002_710538828973144_805574888_n.jpg)
Interesting that their reaction to this disparity is "Fast food workers are demanding too much" as opposed to "Soldiers are making too little"
The situations aren't remotely comparable, of course, but still, interesting.
Whoever thinks that working at fast food is as simple as "breathing" and "flipping burgers" needs to spend one day actually "flipping burgers"
I think they'll find that it's a lot more complicated than that.
I couldn't handle being a dishwasher
Your pants are gonna be ruined from all the bleachI couldn't handle being a dishwasher
30 year restaurant business pro here. Dishwashing is one of the hardest and most stressful jobs in that business. The entire restaurant operation can come to a halt if the disher doesn't keep up with demand during a rush. Even the best veteran disher will sink under the weeds if the machine breaks, or the grease trap backflows. When working as a manager, I always dreaded it if we had only a rookie disher when an unexpected rush hit. I had to go there and help. It was the only position that absolutely required immediate attention in an understaffed or rookie staff situation. I will say without any shame that even I could not handle being a solo disher during a rush - it is mind boggling how fucking awful it can get back behind that dish pit, friends. Steamy screamin' hell.
Your pants are gonna be ruined from all the bleachI couldn't handle being a dishwasher
30 year restaurant business pro here. Dishwashing is one of the hardest and most stressful jobs in that business. The entire restaurant operation can come to a halt if the disher doesn't keep up with demand during a rush. Even the best veteran disher will sink under the weeds if the machine breaks, or the grease trap backflows. When working as a manager, I always dreaded it if we had only a rookie disher when an unexpected rush hit. I had to go there and help. It was the only position that absolutely required immediate attention in an understaffed or rookie staff situation. I will say without any shame that even I could not handle being a solo disher during a rush - it is mind boggling how fucking awful it can get back behind that dish pit, friends. Steamy screamin' hell.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/923403_489350817827962_118348576_n.jpg)
-snip-
The Constitution protected Rosa Park's "freedom" to ride on the back of the bus? HAHAHAHA! Holy shit, do the people who made this realize just how badly their analogy just backfired? ;D
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/923403_489350817827962_118348576_n.jpg)
(http://images.tdaxp.com/tdaxp_flickr/103082180_8dd1a68f52_o.jpg)
(http://images.tdaxp.com/tdaxp_flickr/103082180_8dd1a68f52_o.jpg)
Wrong thread - that's a parody that was made for a competition in Israel about ten years ago. Unfortunately I can't find the site now :(
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/923403_489350817827962_118348576_n.jpg)
The Constitution protected Rosa Park's "freedom" to ride on the back of the bus? HAHAHAHA! Holy shit, do the people who made this realize just how badly their analogy just backfired? ;D
I didn't know where to put this, but no. No. No. No. No.
*snip*
GAWD! How can someone with such a talent for drawing cute anime chibi people waste such a talent on drawing such....NASTINESS?
GAWD! How can someone with such a talent for drawing cute anime chibi people waste such a talent on drawing such....NASTINESS?
I actually know of an artist on DeviantArt who has even better art skills than that shithead. She uses it to do Nazi fanart, mainly of Care Bears and My Little Pony. She used to do socially acceptable art that was very good, but then she suddenly turned to the Dark Side and went into a Nazi phase from which she hasn't grown out of yet, using her artistic skills to glorify the Third Reich. Yes, the irony of using Care Bears and My Little Pony, possibly some of the most sickeningly sugary, tolerant, and friendly shows on earth, seems to be lost on her.
Either thisThe second one actually we negotiated with them all the time in fact Reagan created them
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1378443_624496014248623_673266598_n.jpg)
Or this
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1377471_624895100875381_786560181_n.jpg)
I'm sure one can contrive some reason about how the Care Bears were all about eugenics and fascism.
GAWD! How can someone with such a talent for drawing cute anime chibi people waste such a talent on drawing such....NASTINESS?
I actually know of an artist on DeviantArt who has even better art skills than that shithead. She uses it to do Nazi fanart, mainly of Care Bears and My Little Pony. She used to do socially acceptable art that was very good, but then she suddenly turned to the Dark Side and went into a Nazi phase from which she hasn't grown out of yet, using her artistic skills to glorify the Third Reich. Yes, the irony of using Care Bears and My Little Pony, possibly some of the most sickeningly sugary, tolerant, and friendly shows on earth, seems to be lost on her.
GAWD! How can someone with such a talent for drawing cute anime chibi people waste such a talent on drawing such....NASTINESS?
I actually know of an artist on DeviantArt who has even better art skills than that shithead. She uses it to do Nazi fanart, mainly of Care Bears and My Little Pony. She used to do socially acceptable art that was very good, but then she suddenly turned to the Dark Side and went into a Nazi phase from which she hasn't grown out of yet, using her artistic skills to glorify the Third Reich. Yes, the irony of using Care Bears and My Little Pony, possibly some of the most sickeningly sugary, tolerant, and friendly shows on earth, seems to be lost on her.
....
So these people are serious. They're pro-nazi, and aren't just trying to troll people and using MLP and Care bears for the juxtaposition.
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-aHgpDWknjVo/UIMYD_uTAjI/AAAAAAAAS7M/RwUAiOuhm80/s1600/i-like-this-planet-you-get-off-futurama-0a173b35-sz624x396-animate.png)
I have no words.
Well, I do, but they are mostly repeating "why does this exist?!" over and over again.
I'm sure one can contrive some reason about how the Care Bears were all about eugenics and fascism.
Actually... she doesn't. But she does have this really obnoxious and over-the-top Nazi griffin OC (I'm not making this up) who appears in a lot of her works, despite the fact that neither griffins nor Nazis exist in the Care Bears universe. Furthermore, this character speaks in a thick and exaggerated German accent and has combat-related PTSD (which she alternately romanticizes and makes fun of). He is also occasionally shown screeching in very bad German (as many of the artist's critics have pointed out), and savagely attacking Amigo Bear (whom the artist portrays as a freeloading illegal immigrant because his name is Spanish or something).
I've seen enough awful fan fiction in my time to know that there are fangirls out there who will woobify anybody, no matter how monstrous. A character may eat puppies and blow up planets, but there'll be fangirls for them.
I've seen enough awful fan fiction in my time to know that there are fangirls out there who will woobify anybody, no matter how monstrous. A character may eat puppies and blow up planets, but there'll be fangirls for them.
Please, tell me they don't do it to Broly...
I didn't know where to put this, but no. No. No. No. No.
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/4e9d02e11d82e7dd4f725ed1ba18435b/tumblr_mtqqt0y4AS1sfd2fmo1_1280.png)
EDIT: Did a reverse Google image search on it and found this:
(http://i51.tinypic.com/9rty50.png)
Ok maybe I just have too much faith in peopel or I'm too sensitive to irony but I wanna call Poe.
For one, this guys dismisses the holocaust while also admitting the holocaust happened.
And "Mengele loved gyspy children" has some definite irony when one knows the history.
I just have trouble believing someone can be that self unaware.
A good lier knows what he's lying about at least on some level.
...What I don't...What!It's just the old "they're after our wimminz!" scaremongering. This time misusing the name of Martin Luther King.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/20895c2e19fb4673e1a37c8bb7f3d6d8/tumblr_mtyvpzmgue1re4v7eo1_1280.jpg)
How?
But without the notion of "unwanted" or "unplanned" children that the contraceptive mentality fosters, there would be no abortion.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/20895c2e19fb4673e1a37c8bb7f3d6d8/tumblr_mtyvpzmgue1re4v7eo1_1280.jpg)
I like how they equate the US with the whole earth.But, 'MURRICAN EXEPTIONALISSMMSMMSMMS!
That's because ALL COUNTRIES BELONG TO AMERICA!
That's because ALL COUNTRIES BELONG TO AMERICA!
We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/q71/s720x720/1377571_10201527128732290_1594415596_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/q71/s720x720/1377571_10201527128732290_1594415596_n.jpg)
I'm sorry, what are these "waivers"?
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/q71/s720x720/1377571_10201527128732290_1594415596_n.jpg)
-snip-
Wow equating dressing the way you feel like to down syndrome by the way lady gaga does not dress how society views as normal
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/526960_628163597215198_1377748917_n.jpg)That baby is completely normal (and very white, and probably photoshopped). The "save the disabled babies because they're just different!" rhetoric is incredibly fucked up. My cousin has Sturge-Warner syndrome and KT syndrome (both very rare chromosomal abnormalities; he's the only person in the US with both) and his life isn't something I would wish on anybody. He will never live unassisted, he will never have a partner or spouse, and will almost certainly never hold down a normal job. His childhood was spent in and out of hospitals, schools for the disabled, and his parents' home. He has the intellect of a young child (he's nineteen), and he's constantly trotted out as an example of G-d's love or protection or whatever. My aunt and uncle have been under enormous strain, day in and day out, since before he was born. They will care for him until the day they die. If anyone here thinks that it's okay to value the life of someone/something who might never be able to have a full life over one that already has one, they have lost their fucking minds.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/526960_628163597215198_1377748917_n.jpg)That baby is completely normal (and very white, and probably photoshopped). The "save the disabled babies because they're just different!" rhetoric is incredibly fucked up. My cousin has Sturge-Warner syndrome and KT syndrome (both very rare chromosomal abnormalities; he's the only person in the US with both) and his life isn't something I would wish on anybody. He will never live unassisted, he will never have a partner or spouse, and will almost certainly never hold down a normal job. His childhood was spent in and out of hospitals, schools for the disabled, and his parents' home. He has the intellect of a young child (he's nineteen), and he's constantly trotted out as an example of G-d's love or protection or whatever. My aunt and uncle have been under enormous strain, day in and day out, since before he was born. They will care for him until the day they die. If anyone here thinks that it's okay to value the life of someone/something who might never be able to have a full life over one that already has one, they have lost their fucking minds.
And Lady Gaga? Aside from her somewhat obnoxious fashion choices, she's pretty intelligent and well-spoken. I don't like her music or her dress, but I can respect her as an artist. Besides, you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who considers her fashion sense normal. There's no fucking comparison.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/526960_628163597215198_1377748917_n.jpg)That baby is completely normal (and very white, and probably photoshopped). The "save the disabled babies because they're just different!" rhetoric is incredibly fucked up. My cousin has Sturge-Warner syndrome and KT syndrome (both very rare chromosomal abnormalities; he's the only person in the US with both) and his life isn't something I would wish on anybody. He will never live unassisted, he will never have a partner or spouse, and will almost certainly never hold down a normal job. His childhood was spent in and out of hospitals, schools for the disabled, and his parents' home. He has the intellect of a young child (he's nineteen), and he's constantly trotted out as an example of G-d's love or protection or whatever. My aunt and uncle have been under enormous strain, day in and day out, since before he was born. They will care for him until the day they die. If anyone here thinks that it's okay to value the life of someone/something who might never be able to have a full life over one that already has one, they have lost their fucking minds.
Spoilered for size:It means "if you don't support pointless wars/vote Republican/buy overpriced made-in-China 'I HEART MURRICA' crap, you deserve to be used as a human shield for US soldiers". That said, dear candy coated pogo-sticking Republian Jeezus am I glad I bailed out of the Sonic fandom before discovering the internet.(click to show/hide)
The hell does that even mean?
I'm just baffled by the use of Sonic, who isn't even American.
Spoilered for size:(click to show/hide)
The hell does that even mean?
Spoilered for size:(click to show/hide)
The hell does that even mean?
At what point did the Sonic fandom get kinda peculiar like this? theres a whole fucking bunch of fanart like this. also, fun game: put you name into google images, and then put "The Hedgehog" after it.
I'm just baffled by the use of Sonic, who isn't even American.
I'm just baffled by the use of Sonic, who isn't even American.
In the original canon (which is, itself, no longer canon) Sonic was born and raised "in the forests of Nebraska," because fuck geography.
Then within 5 years, several more canons appeared.
The Sonic fandom I think gets a lot of little kids since its easy to make recolorsORIGINAL CHARACTER DO NOT STEAL :P
Oh. The forests of Nebraska?
I'm just baffled by the use of Sonic, who isn't even American.
In the original canon (which is, itself, no longer canon) Sonic was born and raised "in the forests of Nebraska," because fuck geography.
Then within 5 years, several more canons appeared.
Oh. The forests of Nebraska?
Honestly, the prim lady on the right seems a bit too intrigued by what the crass lady on the left is saying.CrassXPrim Is my new OTP.
I'm a totally ship them.
Most of the women I know would take being called 'unlady like' as a compliment.
My mom made me go to etiquette and deportment classes after school for a year when I turned 11. Mind you, I'm cis lesbian, and was very happy as a tomboy, climbing trees and playing tennis and building crossbows and other fun crazy shit in my spare time. This femininity training sheet looks a lot like what I remember having to study back in 1971. Judging from the "bad example" girl's clothes, maybe this one dates from 1959 to 1965. After I passed the class - which I hated beyond all you can imagine - my mom signed me up for Cotillion ball room dancing. I hated my childhood at times....
Not exactly political, but still pretty fucking stupid. (http://www.musiciansare.com/index.php?id=6927)
Not exactly political, but still pretty fucking stupid. (http://www.musiciansare.com/index.php?id=6927)
Good gravy! A homophobic screed disguised as a snarky critique of Metal music!
This dork complains, among other things, about femmy appearances. What Mr. Homophobe forgets is that a lot of Classic Metal band were even more femmy-looking than today's Metal Bands! The 80's were LOADED with glammed-up prettyboys with tons of cosmetics & hairspray! Sheesh!
Sure, they were still macho meatheads but they were as deliciously dolled up as the groupies they...uh..."groupied" with.
Oh, and don't forget "slouching posture" and "raspy, gravelly voice." Because you can only be feminine if you have perfect skeletal, structural, and vocal health. Fuck all those girls with scoliosis or respiratory problems, amirite?
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/58c7dbc0b96728c89ba3d68728866db4/tumblr_muyx6sSsth1sgn9x2o1_500.jpg)
It's technically reset (sorry been watching Chuggaa)
Anyways they mean is women don't use pregnancy hormones as an excuse for being mean which is odd since usually men ignore concerns saying she's on her period
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/4c2519492119d0c768783a4a362400e1/tumblr_mtj1o2LU4E1r97tsuo1_1280.jpg)
I don't know what I'm looking at, but I've decided I want to go as sexy pyramid-head McCain for Halloween this year.
"Proud to be a white cishet male." Good for you. Please stay 100 miles away from me at all times.Actually, I'd like Mr. White CisHet Male to come a little closer so his ass can meet Mr. White Trans Male's combat boot. That's just me, though.
Ah, the North American Union. One of the few conspiracy theories I would support being enacted.
Ah, the North American Union. One of the few conspiracy theories I would support being enacted.
Is that a flying saucer?Maybe Obama dressed up his spy/killer-drones as UFOs to show how he is into Halloween spirits?
"Proud to be a white cishet male." Good for you. Please stay 100 miles away from me at all times.Actually, I'd like Mr. White CisHet Male to come a little closer so his ass can meet Mr. White Trans Male's combat boot. That's just me, though.
Is that a flying saucer?Maybe Obama dressed up his spy/killer-drones as UFOs to show how he is into Halloween spirits?
Ah, the North American Union. One of the few conspiracy theories I would support being enacted.
Not exactly political, but still pretty fucking stupid. (http://www.musiciansare.com/index.php?id=6927)
Wait until 2096, tho it will be called the United North American States, apparently. And we will lose the Statue of Liberty over it.
Wait until 2096, tho it will be called the United North American States, apparently. And we will lose the Statue of Liberty over it.
United North American Provinces. (http://i41.tinypic.com/2f0gjmr.gif)
Wait until 2096, tho it will be called the United North American States, apparently. And we will lose the Statue of Liberty over it.
United North American Provinces. (http://i41.tinypic.com/2f0gjmr.gif)
States.
"Proud to be a white cishet male." Good for you. Please stay 100 miles away from me at all times.Actually, I'd like Mr. White CisHet Male to come a little closer so his ass can meet Mr. White Trans Male's combat boot. That's just me, though.
I'm 4'10" and had to deal with assholes like him in school. I'd prefer him stay away from me. But you're free to him.Is that a flying saucer?Maybe Obama dressed up his spy/killer-drones as UFOs to show how he is into Halloween spirits?
Maybe.Ah, the North American Union. One of the few conspiracy theories I would support being enacted.
Wait until 2096, tho it will be called the United North American States, apparently. And we will lose the Statue of Liberty over it.
Not exactly political, but still pretty fucking stupid. (http://www.musiciansare.com/index.php?id=6927)
This is Amon Amarth, your argument is invalid.
(http://cdn.actionrecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/150_photo.jpg)
"Proud to be a white cishet male." Good for you. Please stay 100 miles away from me at all times.Actually, I'd like Mr. White CisHet Male to come a little closer so his ass can meet Mr. White Trans Male's combat boot. That's just me, though.
I'm 4'10" and had to deal with assholes like him in school. I'd prefer him stay away from me. But you're free to him.Is that a flying saucer?Maybe Obama dressed up his spy/killer-drones as UFOs to show how he is into Halloween spirits?
Maybe.Ah, the North American Union. One of the few conspiracy theories I would support being enacted.
Wait until 2096, tho it will be called the United North American States, apparently. And we will lose the Statue of Liberty over it.
Yeah, I was playing ME2 last night.
My question is, why where the terrorists who blew up Lady Liberty not hung by their scrotums from the Empire State Building?
"Proud to be a white cishet male." Good for you. Please stay 100 miles away from me at all times.Actually, I'd like Mr. White CisHet Male to come a little closer so his ass can meet Mr. White Trans Male's combat boot. That's just me, though.
I'm 4'10" and had to deal with assholes like him in school. I'd prefer him stay away from me. But you're free to him.Is that a flying saucer?Maybe Obama dressed up his spy/killer-drones as UFOs to show how he is into Halloween spirits?
Maybe.Ah, the North American Union. One of the few conspiracy theories I would support being enacted.
Wait until 2096, tho it will be called the United North American States, apparently. And we will lose the Statue of Liberty over it.
Yeah, I was playing ME2 last night.
My question is, why where the terrorists who blew up Lady Liberty not hung by their scrotums from the Empire State Building?
Well, four of those who blew up Lady Liberty died in the explosion. So I don't think hanging them by their scrotums would've worked out. The others were apprehended and who knows what they went through.
NAFTA NAFTA because we HAFTA
Why are you all speaking Yiddish all of a sudden?
Not exactly political, but still pretty fucking stupid. (http://www.musiciansare.com/index.php?id=6927)
This is Amon Amarth, your argument is invalid.
(http://cdn.actionrecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/150_photo.jpg)
Saw those guys in concert.
Ironbite-really wish the Mayhemfest would punt Masterdon off the main stage and bring some other band up from the side stage.
They're terrible vocalists live. I love their albums, but they can't sing for shit.Not exactly political, but still pretty fucking stupid. (http://www.musiciansare.com/index.php?id=6927)
This is Amon Amarth, your argument is invalid.
(http://cdn.actionrecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/150_photo.jpg)
Saw those guys in concert.
Ironbite-really wish the Mayhemfest would punt Masterdon off the main stage and bring some other band up from the side stage.
Well, for one, Mastodon sells tickets. They're fucking huge. For two, what's wrong with Mastodon in the first place?
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/8d11dfc87507378c15e756331eb102dc/tumblr_mugblcicZs1rxxacmo1_400.jpg)
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Not-giving-welfare-to-lazy-people/121951527819428?id=121951527819428&sk=photos_stream This page is a veritable goldmine of idiotic cartoons.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/63100_562160507131859_2143564458_n.jpg)
But we're not bears...
If it was a white bear, they wouldn't have a problem with it.https://www.facebook.com/pages/Not-giving-welfare-to-lazy-people/121951527819428?id=121951527819428&sk=photos_stream This page is a veritable goldmine of idiotic cartoons.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/63100_562160507131859_2143564458_n.jpg)
But we're not bears...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa_e9B6uNnEIf it was a white bear, they wouldn't have a problem with it.https://www.facebook.com/pages/Not-giving-welfare-to-lazy-people/121951527819428?id=121951527819428&sk=photos_stream This page is a veritable goldmine of idiotic cartoons.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/63100_562160507131859_2143564458_n.jpg)
But we're not bears...
If it was a white bear, they wouldn't have a problem with it.https://www.facebook.com/pages/Not-giving-welfare-to-lazy-people/121951527819428?id=121951527819428&sk=photos_stream This page is a veritable goldmine of idiotic cartoons.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/63100_562160507131859_2143564458_n.jpg)
But we're not bears...
The Potomacs sounds like an excellent name.
...Fiddler on the Roof?
Dan Snyder will never ever ever change the name. Why? Because he's a fucking idiot who doesn't give 1 crap about the fans. There has been pressure for...bout 20 years now if I recall to change the name. Nothing, and I do mean nothing short of a federal law, is going to change the Redskins name as long as Snyder is in control.
Ironbite-I'm serious about that too.
Dan Snyder will never ever ever change the name. Why? Because he's a fucking idiot who doesn't give 1 crap about the fans. There has been pressure for...bout 20 years now if I recall to change the name. Nothing, and I do mean nothing short of a federal law, is going to change the Redskins name as long as Snyder is in control.
Ironbite-I'm serious about that too.
I'm glad the Redskins suck and I'm glad RGKnee had only 1 good season to give the fans hope and then bust. Skins fans are the worst.
QueenofHearts- Except Cowboys fans. My God are those people annoying.
Having a lover's spat?
...Fiddler on the Roof?
I think kefkaownsall was trying to poke fun at the team's owner by comparing his appeals to tradition to Tevye's tendency to do the same when justifying his own backwardness.
American football is for plebs. real hardcore motherfuckers watch hockey.
(https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1384381_720123748017132_1417927189_n.jpg)
Does anyone see the irony if this if you actually watched the series?
(https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1384381_720123748017132_1417927189_n.jpg)
Does anyone see the irony if this if you actually watched the series?
I swear to God, the right lapses into self-parody levels of idiocy and inanity more and more with each passing day.
Somehow I doubt the makers of that lovely picture watch Spongebob- it's made abundantly clear that his boss is screwing him over financially at every opportunity.
American football is just a wimpy version of Rugby after all.
Yeah wrestling both amateur and professional is the closest thing to gay sex you can get and still have it uncensored on TV. I do have to admit though that scrums in rugby look pretty suspect, although from personal experience when I used to play rugby I don't think anyone actually gets excited in the scrum - at least in Rugby as opposed to league I cant imagine anyone getting a thrill in there as usually someone is trying to hurt you (although maybe if you get off on that?). I don't really know though because I am more attracted to women and the only openly gay guys I ever played with were in the backs.
The creator of Spongebob Squarepants is a Republican?
Actually they stopped doing that due to head injuries becoming too much of a thing.
Ironbite-now they just go crashing through metal ladders.
I dunno but whatever the reason, unprotected head shots are a thing of the past now. And thank god for that. Now, like blading, it's only done when the two guys who are doing the spot know what the fuck they're doing and will still get reprimanded for it.
Ironbite-see Undertaker vs. Triple H I for example of why nobody does the chair shot to the head spot anymore.
I wouldn't call a hand growing out of your head a minor condition, and isn't it a good thing that he can't be denied health coverage?
(http://manboobz.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/effcts_of_feminism_by_alexlartwork22-d5ft932.jpg?w=600&h=888)If buying flowers and candy and paying for dates are all that women want and all that men are actually good for that's pretty sad.
And how is there a, 'sanctity of Marriage,' if women are only getting it as a special privilage?
Someone doesn't have TD.
Trigger Discipline.Someone doesn't have TD.
Touchdown?
Tiny Dick?
I don't get it, sorry.
Someone doesn't have TD.
Touchdown?
Tiny Dick?
I don't get it, sorry.
Well, there's an argument to be made that it's important even for toy guns. Not because toy guns themselves are dangerous, but rather, it creates and more importantly encourages good habits.Finally someone who gets it! Those idiots create impressions that apply to gun owners as a broad category.
Imagine seeing all of these military-looking people holding toy guns but maintaining trigger discipline. People will subconsciously emulate that for any gun, real or fake, once they see it enough.
Did I just get complimented by TIM?Yup.
Did I just get complimented by TIM?Yup.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/27dca6d30162edb99a8e203537139aad/tumblr_mwc9zc7Qcj1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
On one of there backs is a person who is the embodiment of detachment from reality, foolishne- fuck it, you know how the joke goes.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TUwdVSjH6Zg/Un7B5n-UZcI/AAAAAAAACJ8/qHGfc60IFEk/s1600/obuma+dumbass.jpg)
(https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTBgJXQGU0Ccvfc96Spp9hpUPdoze-hQSYlfHtADNw0kAeZFvv3)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RpTH9X7ga-g/UPjcUiCV10I/AAAAAAAABf8/wNyJtevUhGk/s1600/obuttass.jpg)
That's the "immature laughing kids" meme. Basically, it's the reaction whenever anyone makes low-brow body humor, such as barfing, farting, and "that looks like a butt!" kinda stuff.
It's mocking the maturity of the person who made that idiotic political cartoon.
Trigger discipline. The fact that it was my first problem with the picture is rather telling. It's a knee-jerk reaction, I admit.
Shouldn't the words be coming out of his arse if it's liarrhea?
This post is wrong. A simple Google search for the board of elections for that county, and this race in particular, proves this wrong. Look it up. I don't like Obama either, but posting false info does not help our cause at all.
Yep...simple search proved this is absolute BS...Cuyahoga
100.0% Reporting
B. Obama (i) Dem 68.8% 420,953
M. Romney GOP 30.2% 184,475
G. Johnson Lib 0.5% 3,281
J. Stein Grn 0.2% 1,490
R. Duncan Una 0.1% 591
V. Goode CST 0.1% 513
S. Alexander Soc 0.0% 209
Not an Obama fan, but there is no way that this is true. You guys have crossed over to the crazy side!
Why would you post something that is so false and made up? It does nothing but makes you look like a fool!
Ad conservatives, we need to STOP posting false information like this. There is enough truthful things that can be posted against this administration that we don't need to post false information. It undermines our credibility.
Don't lie about things like this. It makes conservatives and Libertarians look like, well, Democrats.
Seriously, you need to take this down. Too many people are taking this as fact because they trust you to post stuff that is true. Does that remind you of anything?
Liberal Logic 101 needs to do a better job of vetting their info or it'll appear that you're stooping to the Libs standards.
That's not true. I know cause I voted and not for obama.
I can't stand Obama but this is an outright Lie. We don't need lies to attack Obama. The truth provides plenty of ammunition.
This meme is made-up numbers. Come on people, no one needs to lie to make Obuttma look bad, Lying brings us down to his level.
I understand that the Facebook Page Liberal Logic 101 was reported to Facebook for spreading verifiable falsehoods. It's NOT a good strategy to blatantly lie.
):o The graphic was probably made by a liberal to make conservatives look gullible. Way to go, Liberal Logic 101, you bit on it... hook, line, & sinker.
Also found this post:Quote):o The graphic was probably made by a liberal to make conservatives look gullible. Way to go, Liberal Logic 101, you bit on it... hook, line, & sinker.
If you go to the website on the graphic, you'll find it doesn't exist anymore.Also found this post:Quote):o The graphic was probably made by a liberal to make conservatives look gullible. Way to go, Liberal Logic 101, you bit on it... hook, line, & sinker.
I can't help but think the page is run by liberals who want to make conservatives look gullible and stupid.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/1479138_263243253822983_14747881_n.jpg)Aside from the hammer and sickle none of those symbols are especially sinister.
Grasping at straws here?
Yeah, well "right" is "Dexter."
(http://www.textually.org/tv/archives/images/set3/dexter_gal2_8x10_keyart_logo_small.jpg)
Yeah, well "right" is "Dexter."
(http://www.textually.org/tv/archives/images/set3/dexter_gal2_8x10_keyart_logo_small.jpg)
So... started off as an entertaining diversion, but morphed into a frustrating crapsack once incompetent nutjobs took over the reins... yet still leaves you unable to look away from the trainwreck? Sounds about right.
(http://www.cristyli.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Dry-Bones-Cartoon-of-the-Day.jpg)
Here's the one I mentioned. It includes Evil Jew Facetm for extra points.
(https://global3.memecdn.com/tyrone-gets-an-education_o_1339879.webp)
And here's one that I laughed my ass off at because of the sheer WUT factor. Warning it contains a dude taking a shit.(click to show/hide)
Here's the one I mentioned. It includes Evil Jew Facetm for extra points.(click to show/hide)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/2e24bc5f67e1005c7773cd78cbfc9cd8/tumblr_mwtr9g4FZw1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/3d38b7c7bb143aa2c8716f7f04b63bf8/tumblr_mwyg0fhUfG1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)Please be poes. Actually can someone check the cartoonists work for the first one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9JPGJ1h7tY
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/d977ae391de5c5662596c93221aa1f16/tumblr_mwyg4ftB2r1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/1cb591af1748bb92c82f589c6b160f19/tumblr_mwtj6k0lU31rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/327/043/a42.jpg)
Please be poes. Actually can someone check the cartoonists work for the first one?
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/1cb591af1748bb92c82f589c6b160f19/tumblr_mwtj6k0lU31rr5t33o1_500.jpg)If only... :D
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/3d38b7c7bb143aa2c8716f7f04b63bf8/tumblr_mwyg0fhUfG1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/d977ae391de5c5662596c93221aa1f16/tumblr_mwyg4ftB2r1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/7fc9b7c7b256800758e3bead480a6e0b/tumblr_mwztloRo1z1rr5t33o1_1280.gif)
Sometimes a man cannot fish even if he wished to. That is why you give someone else less fortunate a fish, even if it only feeds them for a day. Many people hate the idea of taking charity. It's only recently that the idea that those who are in need aren't actually in need and are begging just to beg.
Even back during the Great Depression you had people giving to the less fortunate and said less fortunate would refuse it because it infringed on their honor. They wanted to do it themselves. They wanted to earn the money to buy their 'daily fish'. That feeling hasn't changed. But desperate times call for desperate measures. Once you haven't eaten in days because you are completely unable to earn that food you end up deciding that a bit of tarnished honor is nothing compared to the feeling of hunger.
There is also the fact that some people have this odd idea that it is laughably easy to get on welfare and disability. When it's the opposite. Many people very much in need are rejected from accepting welfare or disability.
25% of those treated at Veterans Affairs Hospitals are homeless through no real fault of their own. A lot of homeless are LGBTQ, as well as those who are mentally and/or physically unwell. There are actually very few cases where someone is homeless simply because they didn't manage money that well.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/79dead9c1b81c0098ecf0e7965ec0e12/tumblr_mx1q32pYgZ1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
Yeah, what kind of asshole would think we should give to the poor?
(http://blogs.courant.com/susan_campbell/poor_jesus.jpg)
Oh yeah...
Ironically the Puritans were big government types. There was a reason the British exiled them. Also we are thankful for no big government interfering with our genocideGenocide is such a strong word...
Ironically the Puritans were big government types. There was a reason the British exiled them. Also we are thankful for no big government interfering with our genocideGenocide is such a strong word...
not to mention diseased blankets etc which killed I think 90%
(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/012/132/thatsthejoke.jpg)Ironically the Puritans were big government types. There was a reason the British exiled them. Also we are thankful for no big government interfering with our genocideGenocide is such a strong word...
Not really, (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/American_Indian_Holocaust) considering the numerous examples of slaughtering innocent civilians simply because they were Native American, as well as the forced assimilation policies in Indian boarding schools.
I figured but you can't tell on the internet especially with debates on is this genocide
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/79dead9c1b81c0098ecf0e7965ec0e12/tumblr_mx1q32pYgZ1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
Yeah, what kind of asshole would think we should give to the poor?
(http://blogs.courant.com/susan_campbell/poor_jesus.jpg)
Oh yeah...
I don't know why they are complicating the narrative ::) Seriously its simple education makes us better
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/23c7e8f34214302fa497b8a365944c29/tumblr_mx46rfZQir1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
Ironically the Puritans were big government types. There was a reason the British exiled them. Also we are thankful for no big government interfering with our genocide
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bstXBEDnG9w/TRufZ5MMWWI/AAAAAAAAEXM/ZP_m2MylnLQ/s1600/liberal-brain.bmp)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/w0jpt4.jpg)Psst, this is real life, not a rape-revenge exploitation flick.
::)
Apparently this was created for a law firm in Alabama. (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/02/was-alabama-law-firm-hacked-with-incredibly-racist-ad/)
I don't even know where to put this, it's just so awful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8oagEiRR-8
(http://i1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee498/FadingLight/Venn_zps9ae1c3b5.jpg)This almost seems like a troll post.
Edgy.
(https://sites.google.com/site/jonjayray/offence.jpg)
Yes, in fact I am not only un-offended by the second picture, I actually jack off to it as I love to see children die in fire because I am an America hating elitist.
I will now run over innocent toddlers in a steamroller.
(http://i.imgur.com/ImEIchq.jpg)
I just... what the fuck. What the fuck.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bstXBEDnG9w/TRufZ5MMWWI/AAAAAAAAEXM/ZP_m2MylnLQ/s1600/liberal-brain.bmp)This one made me laugh, since the Liberal Democrats (UK political party) are pretty much the lite version of the Conservative party. (UK political party)
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bstXBEDnG9w/TRufZ5MMWWI/AAAAAAAAEXM/ZP_m2MylnLQ/s1600/liberal-brain.bmp)This one made me laugh, since the Liberal Democrats (UK political party) are pretty much the lite version of the Conservative party. (UK political party)
Do those Wal Mart wankers know many of the protestors are actually their own employeesGoing by their anti-Union videos they force you to sit thru on day one of your employment, I highly doubt it. That, or they just don't care.
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_yMoHsr4ucWs/S8rgjfKtNlI/AAAAAAAABCs/To1x4UoQDiI/s1600/Borg_Obama_Cube.jpg)
Quote(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_yMoHsr4ucWs/S8rgjfKtNlI/AAAAAAAABCs/To1x4UoQDiI/s1600/Borg_Obama_Cube.jpg)
;D
VOTE FOR PROG!*
*I'm not a Borg though, and I don't drive an easy-type Rubix Cube.
Okay what is up with this and that walmart using 80s teens
(https://24.media.tumblr.com/6c52e7e69db4ac56e5c10fcac53ef36a/tumblr_mxeizygofx1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)May botflys lay eggs in your genitals, Ted Rall.
The supermarket chain I work for has a flyer for the shop workers union in the staff room, and it isnt hidden or anything, its sitting there on the same board along with stuff about regulations and things. Im so glad the UK is no where as anti-union as the US (though I know the Tory party are trying hard to make it that way, and im sure Wal-Mart will be happy considering they own one of the big UK supermarkets. Luckily people over here dont listen to that sort of bullshit.)Do those Wal Mart wankers know many of the protestors are actually their own employeesGoing by their anti-Union videos they force you to sit thru on day one of your employment, I highly doubt it. That, or they just don't care.
So, apparently Ted Rall, the douche cartoonist I've posted about in the Things People Say thread, decided to have a whack at Mandela:
(https://24.media.tumblr.com/6c52e7e69db4ac56e5c10fcac53ef36a/tumblr_mxeizygofx1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
A Something Awful user named Snoggle decided to improve it:(click to show/hide)
(https://sites.google.com/site/jonjayray/garbage.gif)
Trying to fight against the International Jewish Conspiracy without fighting the ideology behind it, ect. Your ignorance leads to a dark, dark place.
The second one confuses me."Arabs=bad Jews/Israel=good
Bleached Bones is a parody of Dry Bones, I'm assuming.I know.
(http://i45.tinypic.com/ilanac.jpg)
You sure showed her!
The second one confuses me.
I know it's a satire, I posted it as a response to the othersThe second one confuses me.
I say the same.
Also, the last one called Bleached Bones looks to me like a satire of Dry Bones.
Hmm... How do you know that, though? I don't know what the artist's intentions were. It's not really crystal clear. Eh, to me it's middling.
Ah, I guess it doesn't really matter. Sometimes I'm dense.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/21b383093e61637e1332a2b188c17579/tumblr_mvaibmGBLV1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/21b383093e61637e1332a2b188c17579/tumblr_mvaibmGBLV1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
I'm tempted to send that guy an email.(http://25.media.tumblr.com/21b383093e61637e1332a2b188c17579/tumblr_mvaibmGBLV1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
WHEN POLITICAL CARTOONISTS REACH THE MORAL EVENT HORIZON!
Now, I need a shower....
I'm tempted to send that guy an email.(http://25.media.tumblr.com/21b383093e61637e1332a2b188c17579/tumblr_mvaibmGBLV1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
WHEN POLITICAL CARTOONISTS REACH THE MORAL EVENT HORIZON!
Now, I need a shower....
Send that to NASA. Let them take vengeance.
To Mr. or Ms. Ramirez, cartoonist for Investors Daily;
Using the photo of the STS Challenger exploding as the main element of a political cartoon is obscenely disrespectful. That event was a national tragedy, had no political overtones to begin with, and should never be used for expressing sarcasm. Notice the small objects in a loose group, streaming away from the right side of the main explosion smoke plume? Those are the crew members' bodies after their seats automatically ejected when the latched dome over the crew and cockpit compartment automatically popped off when catastrophic launch failure was recognized by the onboard systems a split second before the main explosion.
If we don't get a sincere apology from hum then I say we consider him to have officially crossed the morale event horizon.I'm tempted to send that guy an email.(http://25.media.tumblr.com/21b383093e61637e1332a2b188c17579/tumblr_mvaibmGBLV1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
WHEN POLITICAL CARTOONISTS REACH THE MORAL EVENT HORIZON!
Now, I need a shower....Send that to NASA. Let them take vengeance.
I could send that to the retired support staff for that mission still living in Satellite Beach, down the road from me, but it would make them sob. My mom watched that explosion live from 10 miles off in Titusville. It was the one time she went to the trouble of dealing with the traffic and crowds to see a launch up close. You can see all Cape Canaveral launches from my front yard if there is no cloud cover in the 45 mile stretch between my place and the launch pads. You could here the shuttles, too, the rocket engines on them were so fucking huge.
ADDENDUM:
I am lizard, you have the right idea. Below is a paste of the email I just sent to 2013@creators.comQuoteTo Mr. or Ms. Ramirez, cartoonist for Investors Daily;
Using the photo of the STS Challenger exploding as the main element of a political cartoon is obscenely disrespectful. That event was a national tragedy, had no political overtones to begin with, and should never be used for expressing sarcasm. Notice the small objects in a loose group, streaming away from the right side of the main explosion smoke plume? Those are the crew members' bodies after their seats automatically ejected when the latched dome over the crew and cockpit compartment automatically popped off when catastrophic launch failure was recognized by the onboard systems a split second before the main explosion.
Yes the original cartoon was made to commemerate the explosion.
To Mr. or Ms. Ramirez, cartoonist for Investors Daily;
Using the photo of the STS Challenger exploding as the main element of a political cartoon is obscenely disrespectful. That event was a national tragedy, had no political overtones to begin with, and should never be used for expressing sarcasm. Notice the small objects in a loose group, streaming away from the right side of the main explosion smoke plume? Those are the crew members' bodies after their seats automatically ejected when the latched dome over the crew and cockpit compartment automatically popped off when catastrophic launch failure was recognized by the onboard systems a split second before the main explosion. (Bolding mine - SP)
QuoteTo Mr. or Ms. Ramirez, cartoonist for Investors Daily;
Using the photo of the STS Challenger exploding as the main element of a political cartoon is obscenely disrespectful. That event was a national tragedy, had no political overtones to begin with, and should never be used for expressing sarcasm. Notice the small objects in a loose group, streaming away from the right side of the main explosion smoke plume? Those are the crew members' bodies after their seats automatically ejected when the latched dome over the crew and cockpit compartment automatically popped off when catastrophic launch failure was recognized by the onboard systems a split second before the main explosion.
My brother is best friends with a retired mission control center technician (he monitored telemetry data -streams of numbers, not visuals - but they are all in the same room and they all talk). The media almost immediately quashed the early reports about the bodies and "corrected" it to small "debris" streams. There was already more than enough grief about the disaster, and I guess some higher-ups justifiably figured it was a matter of privacy and dignity for the deceased astronauts' families, and respect for the dead, to put a stop to a very extreme piece of TMI.
Understand, that the seat eject system was not designed to save lives - that is impossible when a Saturn 5 plus two boosters fails at high altitude and acceleration; it's not like the astronauts have a fighter pilot's parachute on their seats or suits. Because of the blown cabin roof and seat ejections, some few body parts were recoverable. The launch was aimed outward over the Atlantic, as they all are, so most partial remains that did not completely immolate and disintegrate on the way down sunk into the water and were not recovered. There were no monitored screams from the astronauts mics - they died instantly from the massive concussive shock force of the blasts.
Spuki, what you are recalling maybe are reports about STS Columbia when it broke up on re-entry.
My brother's friend worked for NASA; my brother works as a surgical nurse in a county hospital trauma unit, and I think this is clearly a case of me switching the sets of reports in my memory of our conversations about the two separate incidents. In any case, I still hate that cartoonist, and that email bounced back at me as undeliverable, so Ramirez has not seen it. Fuck him, anyway.
Crew fate
Divers from the USS Preserver located what they believed to be the crew cabin on the ocean floor on March 7. A dive the following day confirmed that it was the cabin and that the remains of the crew were inside.[6] No official investigation into the Challenger disaster has concluded for certain the cause of death of the astronauts; it is almost certain, however, that the disintegration itself did not kill the entire crew as 3 of the 4 PEAPs (personal egress air packs) that were recovered had been manually activated. This would only be done during an emergency or loss of cabin pressure (although whether cabin pressure was lost is still in debate but considered likely). PEAPs do not provide a pressurized air flow and would still have resulted in the astronauts losing consciousness within several seconds.[7] There were media reports alleging that NASA had a secret tape recording of the crew panicking and on-board conversation following the disintegration during the 2 minute 45 second free fall before hitting the sea east of Florida. This was likely fabricated and no such recording exists: the crew may have been unconscious from loss of cabin pressure and the astronauts did not wear individual voice recorders.[8] Any such voice recording facility would have been without power since the breakup of the orbiter immediately separated the crew compartment from the power-generating fuel cells in the back of the vehicle. It is certain that the impact of the shuttle with the sea would have killed any still surviving astronauts on board, though they may have died before the impact of other causes.
My understanding is that no space shuttles after the first two prototype launches contained any ejection system. To include one of any kind would take up too much space for something that wasn't of any use. This is further proved by the fact that there was a lot of research in to refitting the shuttles with an eject system after one of the disasters and it was found to be next to impossible without totally rebuilding the shuttle.
(https://scontent-b-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1462973_667291996635691_746862621_n.jpg)A response
It's like Ramirez was told that his previous comic was the worst thing ever and then decided to prove that he can be even more horrible.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/21b383093e61637e1332a2b188c17579/tumblr_mvaibmGBLV1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
...And then
(http://www.threedonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ramirez.jpg)
What? I mean... WHAT?!
Ramirez... what... WHAT?!?!
Ramirez has earned his own personal titles, since Cartoonist doesn't properly describe him anymore;
Trolltoonist.
Cuntoonist.
Douchetoonist.
Dicktoonist.
(http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mrz112613dAPR20131125094513.jpg)
[Laughing intensifies]
investor's business daily really is the place for talentless partisan hacks, isn't it? That's probably why Generation Opportunity on FaceBook think the op-eds section is a legitimate source of information.Someone who apparently didn't know the Pilgrims were dropping like flies from disease.
The cartoon about the pilgrims being thankful for not having ObamaCare...yeah, I'm sure someone told him that was clever.
Yeah, that one with Obama in the wolf suit I had to look hard to even tell that was supposed to be his face and not just a wolf that had an ugly rubber chicken or something in its jaws.He was saying he thinks Obama if a furry.
... That last one... what the hell is Charlie Brown doing there?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t348e24vDyA
Me: So what's your opinion on Edward Snowden?
Conservatoons: Very low. He did not go thru proper channels. He went to foreign press and seeks asylum in enemy states.
Me: Do you think he has any information that would be severely detrimental to the Obama administration?
Conservatoons: Doesn't matter. Media have lied for him from the beginning. They will continue to do so because his socialist policies are in line w/ the medias desire to turn us into a gender neutral, socialist utopia managed by our betters. Also to expose him would be to admit they too lied or that they are dupes. If Snowden pulled this stunt w/ a Repub in office it would be the ongoing daily crisis and embarrassment - which it is. Not to mention dangerous and a terrible precedent.
... That last one... what the hell is Charlie Brown doing there?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t348e24vDyA
*
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/3561d4bf933535479f23400388523532/tumblr_mxptiaibwt1rzv6rko1_500.png)
... That last one... what the hell is Charlie Brown doing there?
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/0d986680042c6d3612d4db49108ad719/tumblr_mxv6clzpCN1s966nho1_500.jpg)
LOL how do i science?
*
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/3561d4bf933535479f23400388523532/tumblr_mxptiaibwt1rzv6rko1_500.png)
I wonder if they include abortion in the whole "making up their own minds" thing.
(http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/311/8/2/liberals_never_seem_to_grow_up_by_conservatoons-d6tfm34.jpg)
If you don't join the army then you have are a failure and you should kill yourself.
Don't feel like making a new topic, so I'll post a conversation I had with with Conservatoons on DeviantArt.Carrying onQuoteMe: So what's your opinion on Edward Snowden?
Conservatoons: Very low. He did not go thru proper channels. He went to foreign press and seeks asylum in enemy states.
Me: Do you think he has any information that would be severely detrimental to the Obama administration?
Conservatoons: Doesn't matter. Media have lied for him from the beginning. They will continue to do so because his socialist policies are in line w/ the medias desire to turn us into a gender neutral, socialist utopia managed by our betters. Also to expose him would be to admit they too lied or that they are dupes. If Snowden pulled this stunt w/ a Repub in office it would be the ongoing daily crisis and embarrassment - which it is. Not to mention dangerous and a terrible precedent.
Me: Even then, it was that incident that Obama's approval rating took a hit, both domestically as well as outside. By contrast, what is your opinion of the NSA nowadays on their conduct?Now that I look back, does it look like I'm secretly an NSA agent trying to catch him saying something bad about the NSA or something?
Conservatoons: The dirty secret is that the NSA have be doing it for 30 yrs or more. Correctly run most people have little to worry. NSA sucks up everything, looks for anomalies. You really have to be a standout among trillions of msgs to get the attn of the supercomputer. IMO the danger is that only recently have these agencies been so abused - with citizens, companies, associations and organizations being specifically targeted.
Me: Yeah, it's ridiculous what the NSA is wasting its resources on, like World of Warcraft and other MMORPGs, unless terrorists are using those or the NSA employees are simply bored (most likely). Your comment "Correctly run most people have little to worry" ironically worries me. Don't people say the same thing about background checks?
Conservatoons: Good pt. My main pt. w/ NSA is that their prob is too much data. It seems that a very focused look at anyone or anything would/should be the exception unless someone in govt orders it. And there is prob a record of that.
KZN02: Looking at your work, you don't seem to have much on Snowden or the NSA (save for bin Laden death and another cartoon). You don't find those worth drawing about?
Conservatoons: No. It is too in the weeds for most.
(http://i.imgur.com/ENmujFm.jpg)
Response:(click to show/hide)
(http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/311/8/2/liberals_never_seem_to_grow_up_by_conservatoons-d6tfm34.jpg)
If you don't join the army then you have are a failure and you should kill yourself.
(http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/311/8/2/liberals_never_seem_to_grow_up_by_conservatoons-d6tfm34.jpg)
If you don't join the army then you have are a failure and you should kill yourself.
I find this particularly amusing since I was in the military (though Navy, not army) and if anything it helped make me even MORE liberal then I was originally.
Though the military as an institution can be quite conservative, I don't think all of it's members are as much as the cartoonist assumes.
And haven't we had generals testifying before congress we needed better gun control laws and that climate change could become a security issue?
So even as an institution, it has some Liberal kinks.
To avoid copyright infringement by including an Apple Store.
(http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/311/8/2/liberals_never_seem_to_grow_up_by_conservatoons-d6tfm34.jpg)
If you don't join the army then you have are a failure and you should kill yourself.
I find this particularly amusing since I was in the military (though Navy, not army) and if anything it helped make me even MORE liberal then I was originally.
Though the military as an institution can be quite conservative, I don't think all of it's members are as much as the cartoonist assumes.
And haven't we had generals testifying before congress we needed better gun control laws and that climate change could become a security issue?
So even as an institution, it has some Liberal kinks.
Yes, regardless of the trope that the military is this stuck up conservative hole, it really isn't. Not compared to a lot of things. It's kind of a tradition considering the fact that the military was actually relatively quick when it came to minorities and women serving (which includes various rights they weren't given outside of the military).
Military history is rather fascinating, tbh.
Apparently on becoming an adult conservative, your mouth dissapears. which to be honest seems like a benefit for us.
Apparently on becoming an adult conservative, your mouth dissapears. which to be honest seems like a benefit for us.
And HOW! I wish that was the case.
Frankly, considering the Neo-Con's old-timey, backwards ways and life of non-stop fear & paranoia, I think they should be the "Frumptacular Insta-Geezers".
its about Assange
a lot of things are wrong with that for one thing he' was not charged with rape in fact the sex crime had a 5000 kroner fine as punishment so his fear was that Sweden was going to use thee charge as an excuse to send him to America
but apparently Swedish Muslims also have good bread.
its about Assange
a lot of things are wrong with that for one thing he' was not charged with rape in fact the sex crime had a 5000 kroner fine as punishment so his fear was that Sweden was going to use thee charge as an excuse to send him to America
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/1030c504ef4ad0a029c5f7d3ad2ef4c5/tumblr_mycl4qeOX31r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
I don't understand the point that the last comic is trying to make...
I don't understand the point that the last comic is trying to make...
That non-Christians who celebrate Christmas are hypocrites.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1477732_671170966247794_100851057_n.jpg)Response:
Apparently on becoming an adult conservative, your mouth dissapears. which to be honest seems like a benefit for us.
And HOW! I wish that was the case.
Frankly, considering the Neo-Con's old-timey, backwards ways and life of non-stop fear & paranoia, I think they should be the "Frumptacular Insta-Geezers".
Also, a great name for a Jazz Fusion band.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1511270_671619969536227_364558576_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1511270_671619969536227_364558576_n.jpg)WE UPPER-CLASS WHITE, CHRISTIAN, MALES ARE HAVE BEEN OPPRESSED FOR TO LONG!
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1511270_671619969536227_364558576_n.jpg)
They may take our crap, but they'll never. TAKE. OUR KITTIES!
*snip*
They may take our crap, but they'll never. TAKE. OUR KITTIES!
*Holds up one of my cats* "From my cold, dead hands!"
They may take our crap, but they'll never. TAKE. OURKITTIES!PONIES!
*snip*
They may take our crap, but they'll never. TAKE. OUR KITTIES!
*Holds up one of my cats* "From my cold, dead hands!"
*shoots The Doctor in the face*
*takes the kitty from his cold dead hands and runs away* MWAHAHAHA!!!
*snip*
They may take our crap, but they'll never. TAKE. OUR KITTIES!
*Holds up one of my cats* "From my cold, dead hands!"
*shoots The Doctor in the face*
*takes the kitty from his cold dead hands and runs away* MWAHAHAHA!!!
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p403x403/1546460_671835682847989_911515424_n.jpg)
I think you guys should know why this is amusing.
Actually no, look into what George Bush signed back in 2007.(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p403x403/1546460_671835682847989_911515424_n.jpg)
I think you guys should know why this is amusing.
Ok I'll take a shot.
For one these bulbs last several times longer and use less electricity.
Which means they will cost the poor LESS leaving more money for food in the long run.
Which is good since cons keep cutting food stamps.
The Lighting Efficiency Mandate will phase out the use of standard incandescent light bulbs by 2014 and improve lighting efficiency by more than 70 percent by 2020.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p403x403/1546460_671835682847989_911515424_n.jpg)
I think you guys should know why this is amusing.
Ok I'll take a shot.
For one these bulbs last several times longer and use less electricity.
Which means they will cost the poor LESS leaving more money for food in the long run.
Which is good since cons keep cutting food stamps.
So I checked back to Liberal Logic 101 if they still have the post and image and lo and behold, it's gone.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs
Me: So, what's your take on the whole incandescent light bulb situation right now?
Conservatoons: I think the market should decide. I like them. The others are very expensive up front so if they break or don't work you loose. Also sometimes you want the heat w/ the light. Frankly, lighting is one of the least drains of elect. It is like tuning up an old car. Yeah it helps but it really doesn't make much diff. Space heating, motors, AC, are the real consumers of residential power.
Me: I see, I've been seeing a lot of people outraged about this, but this was something they should have seen coming back in 2007. However, who knows what will come up in regards to it.
Conservatoons: We could always allow them again. Sadly, the jobs are gone and plants moved. It cost companies a lot of money to shift away from incandescent quicker than market forces wanted. Mostly I just don't think govt has that right. Obama has proved me wrong. Not only can it kill normal light bulbs. It can steal whole car companies and force citizens to buy health insurance - without guaranteeing health care. Some world these days.
Me: As I said before, we should have seen this coming. Are you familiar with the Energy Security and Independence Act??
Conservatoons: Vaguely. It forces stupid eco measures upon us. Hopefully it will be undone when adults return to DC.
Me: For your convenience (http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/energy/)
Conservatoons: Yeah, that and Prescription Drug Benny. Not his greatest hrs. W was a Big Govt. Republican not a conservative. Still beats The Big Zero by far though.
Evidently there's a sport where people run with chainsaws strapped to their feet, as per the large mural on the building...
I laughed a little.
Should we cripple more people so handicap parking is not wasted?
Yes, that would a Liberals’ solution.
No, we can get unemployed to be declared handicapped. Win-win!
No, just make every parking lot 10% larger.
No, we can plant trees in all the unused spaces then build in parks.
No, allow homeless to camp in unused spaces.
Yes, as long as those crippled are rich.
No, those spots belong to Electric cars owners. Expel all others.
No, but govt could require far fewer spots.
Evidently there's a sport where people run with chainsaws strapped to their feet, as per the large mural on the building...
I laughed a little.
Oy, Chainsaw-shoe tennis is a noble sport! Or at least I think that is a tennis racket in his hand. It could also be an ice cream cone...
Accompanying pollQuoteShould we cripple more people so handicap parking is not wasted?
Yes, that would a Liberals’ solution.
No, we can get unemployed to be declared handicapped. Win-win!
No, just make every parking lot 10% larger.
No, we can plant trees in all the unused spaces then build in parks.
No, allow homeless to camp in unused spaces.
Yes, as long as those crippled are rich.
No, those spots belong to Electric cars owners. Expel all others.
No, but govt could require far fewer spots.
I wish I was, but ... (http://conservatoons.deviantart.com/journal/poll/4129830)Accompanying pollQuoteShould we cripple more people so handicap parking is not wasted?
Yes, that would a Liberals’ solution.
No, we can get unemployed to be declared handicapped. Win-win!
No, just make every parking lot 10% larger.
No, we can plant trees in all the unused spaces then build in parks.
No, allow homeless to camp in unused spaces.
Yes, as long as those crippled are rich.
No, those spots belong to Electric cars owners. Expel all others.
No, but govt could require far fewer spots.
Oh dear fucking god, please tell me you're joking.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/940813_274894045991237_104933886_n.jpg)
I don't know where this goes, but ...This is funny if you pretend the reason those poeple are disabled are because of the chainsaws.
(http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/363/b/4/handicap_parking_by_conservatoons-d6zx2oc.jpg)
Correction: it's not on their Facebook page anymore, but it's still on their main page, so in case you want to tie the pic to them, you can find it there.
Asked Conservatoons on this whole thing:QuoteMe: So, what's your take on the whole incandescent light bulb situation right now?
Conservatoons: I think the market should decide. I like them. The others are very expensive up front so if they break or don't work you loose. Also sometimes you want the heat w/ the light. Frankly, lighting is one of the least drains of elect. It is like tuning up an old car. Yeah it helps but it really doesn't make much diff. Space heating, motors, AC, are the real consumers of residential power.
Me: I see, I've been seeing a lot of people outraged about this, but this was something they should have seen coming back in 2007. However, who knows what will come up in regards to it.
Conservatoons: We could always allow them again. Sadly, the jobs are gone and plants moved. It cost companies a lot of money to shift away from incandescent quicker than market forces wanted. Mostly I just don't think govt has that right. Obama has proved me wrong. Not only can it kill normal light bulbs. It can steal whole car companies and force citizens to buy health insurance - without guaranteeing health care. Some world these days.
Me: As I said before, we should have seen this coming. Are you familiar with the Energy Security and Independence Act??
Conservatoons: Vaguely. It forces stupid eco measures upon us. Hopefully it will be undone when adults return to DC.
Me: For your convenience (http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/energy/)
Conservatoons: Yeah, that and Prescription Drug Benny. Not his greatest hrs. W was a Big Govt. Republican not a conservative. Still beats The Big Zero by far though.
I don't know where this goes, but ...This is funny if you pretend the reason those poeple are disabled are because of the chainsaws.
(http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/363/b/4/handicap_parking_by_conservatoons-d6zx2oc.jpg)
We'll the source is really big into destroying liberal strawmen so this might be a statement against the evil PC nazis who won't let me be an ableist, sexist, homophobic, racist.I don't know where this goes, but ...This is funny if you pretend the reason those poeple are disabled are because of the chainsaws.
(http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/363/b/4/handicap_parking_by_conservatoons-d6zx2oc.jpg)
I don't think you have to pretend, I think that is the joke/point of the cartoon.
Has nothing to do with anything but I'm seeing Jeff on the third. :3 Walter is my favorite.
Found this dozy...
(https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/1528617_417178165081311_859939006_n.jpg)
Well, if that's the point of the cartoon, the artist did it wrong.
... Or maybe my liberal rage is on the fritz again.
Taken as apolitical, it's hilarious! Taken as political, it's stupid.
But as the former, it's darkly hilarious! The joke being that you have all these dorks doing "EXTREEEEEMMME!" sports like "chainsaw skiing" or whatever that it wouldn't be surprising that they're crappy at it & need an "All-Handicapped" parking lot.
Also even the starter jobs can't compete with rising rent.
Found this dozy...
(https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/1528617_417178165081311_859939006_n.jpg)
WE HAVE FOSSILS.....SO *PBBBBTH!*
@Booley: Nope. They're the same people that outright deny that magic exists while simultaneously believing in a being that magically created everything.
If Jesus, then Aliens. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IfJesusThenAliens)@Booley: Nope. They're the same people that outright deny that magic exists while simultaneously believing in a being that magically created everything.
I think that's a fallacy.
Believing in aliens does not mean you must also believe in Santa for example. It is perfectly possible to believe in one thing that others consider to be supernatural. Neither does believing religion X mean that you must also believe in all other religions for example.
@Booley: Nope. They're the same people that outright deny that magic exists while simultaneously believing in a being that magically created everything.
I think that's a fallacy.
Believing in aliens does not mean you must also believe in Santa for example. It is perfectly possible to believe in one thing that others consider to be supernatural. Neither does believing religion X mean that you must also believe in all other religions for example.
you people who believe any "Scientific" study you believe are very naïve. Anyone who has taken a statistics course knows that you can design a study to get the results that you want. I don't trust "scientists".
I actually know a lot about what I am talking about. I don't trust science. Scientists try to disprove that God exists, so I guess so I supposed to believe that too. Science tells me I evolved from monkeys, I don't believe that. Its scientists that are creating these chemicals in labs that are making us sick. So keep trusting science. Make sure that you eat your GMO food, get your vaccines and drink your fluorinated water. Have a good day.
If correlation doesn't equal causation I am sure you will admit that there is no proof that vaccines caused decline of illness. It is simply an assumption. Dr. Wakefield is nothing but a scapegoat. Recent news articles, however, show that there are more scientists skewing data to get vaccines approved. You might want to look the other direction, Charlie.
If Jesus, then Aliens. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IfJesusThenAliens)@Booley: Nope. They're the same people that outright deny that magic exists while simultaneously believing in a being that magically created everything.
I think that's a fallacy.
Believing in aliens does not mean you must also believe in Santa for example. It is perfectly possible to believe in one thing that others consider to be supernatural. Neither does believing religion X mean that you must also believe in all other religions for example.
It is incongruous to both hold that there is no magic, while believing in a being whose very existence can only logically be due to magic. Its not "there's no Wiccan magic" or "there's no Voodoo magic," but "there's no magic, at all." Yes, this is a phenomenon I've encountered exclusively in the Abrahamic faiths' practitioners. If one kind of magic exists, then magic exists, in at least one form.
Funny how, during the Satanic Panic, the accusors believed more in magic than the accused.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/q71/1526667_276582502489058_1566797880_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/q71/1488164_675464735818417_2132563114_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/q71/1600994_675465785818312_1338971196_n.jpg)
It is incongruous to both hold that there is no magic, while believing in a being whose very existence can only logically be due to magic. Its not "there's no Wiccan magic" or "there's no Voodoo magic," but "there's no magic, at all." Yes, this is a phenomenon I've encountered exclusively in the Abrahamic faiths' practitioners. If one kind of magic exists, then magic exists, in at least one form.
That may be what Christians say they believe, but what they really believe is "There's no magic except GAWD!"
Speaking from a former-Christian current-pagan perspective, a lot of what they do is magic, even if they deny it. I'm not just talking about the liturgical churches such as Catholicism (which is more likely to believe in magic than any other denomination, I think) but also the evangelical churches, such as baptists.
And while this technically doesn't fall under "magic use" (though there's some debate about that), they'll certain use prayer like it's magic.
Incidentally, the closer a fundie was to the "Satanic Panic", the more likely they are to believe in magic, though they tend to view all non-Christian magic as being from Satan, so every witch/voodoo/hoodoo/eastern monk/whatever has made a deal with demons to achieve their magic.
Of course, this is speaking from someone familiar with both the concept of magic as applied in paganistic circles, and someone familiar with how fundies use prayer and faith. Your mileage may vary.
It is incongruous to both hold that there is no magic, while believing in a being whose very existence can only logically be due to magic. Its not "there's no Wiccan magic" or "there's no Voodoo magic," but "there's no magic, at all." Yes, this is a phenomenon I've encountered exclusively in the Abrahamic faiths' practitioners. If one kind of magic exists, then magic exists, in at least one form.
That may be what Christians say they believe, but what they really believe is "There's no magic except GAWD!"
Speaking from a former-Christian current-pagan perspective, a lot of what they do is magic, even if they deny it. I'm not just talking about the liturgical churches such as Catholicism (which is more likely to believe in magic than any other denomination, I think) but also the evangelical churches, such as baptists.
And while this technically doesn't fall under "magic use" (though there's some debate about that), they'll certain use prayer like it's magic.
Incidentally, the closer a fundie was to the "Satanic Panic", the more likely they are to believe in magic, though they tend to view all non-Christian magic as being from Satan, so every witch/voodoo/hoodoo/eastern monk/whatever has made a deal with demons to achieve their magic.
Of course, this is speaking from someone familiar with both the concept of magic as applied in paganistic circles, and someone familiar with how fundies use prayer and faith. Your mileage may vary.
I'm one of those "only G-d can do magic" believers. I should add that I see holding deities to the laws of physics to be rather silly. If there were other gods, they would also be able to do "magic".
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/q71/1526667_276582502489058_1566797880_n.jpg)
….
Googling says someone from msnbc called him a political terrorist.(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/q71/1526667_276582502489058_1566797880_n.jpg)
….
Who called cruz a terrorist?
Bloviating idiot. But not terrorist.
It's like some cons aren't' even trying anymore.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/bbc72352ec2f809232cfc491b113d7d8/tumblr_myuxp9aYPE1rokpkmo1_1280.png)
lolatprolife responded (http://lolatprolife.tumblr.com/post/72240764535/muchadoabiutnothing-saying-abortions-are-okay) best:QuoteDo you actually think of this as something noteworthy that makes a point because it is a steaming pile of shit.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/q71/1488164_675464735818417_2132563114_n.jpg)Conservative woman are only able to think if the talking points are handed to them by Fox News whereas liberal women are concerned about stopping discrimination based on their reproductive organs.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/bbc72352ec2f809232cfc491b113d7d8/tumblr_myuxp9aYPE1rokpkmo1_1280.png)
That's a parody.
You should see the originals, then! :o
I'm not sure I get it. Is Pajama Boy supposed to be anyone in particular?
The pic also assumes that all employees work 365 days a year...
The pic also assumes that all employees work 365 days a year...
I'm sure some employers would have them do that if they could...
Fixed that for you.The pic also assumes that all employees work 365 days a year...
I'm sure some employers would have them do that for free.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1493198_677433425621548_2100791406_n.jpg)
The second top comment for this mentions that #3 is incorrect on the math and cue an argument about the validity of the entire pic.
Fixed that for you.The pic also assumes that all employees work 365 days a year...
I'm sure some employers would have them do that for free.
Fixed that for you.The pic also assumes that all employees work 365 days a year...
I'm sure some employers would have them do that for free.
Some employers would probably try to find a way to have employees pay them.
And I was just told that, despite police warnings to stay off the roads in Chicago and Northwest Indiana, employers are still pressuring employees to come in for work. Roads are so bad that my mom isn't being allowed to go home from work, yet some employers are insisting employees still drive to work.
Fixed that for you.The pic also assumes that all employees work 365 days a year...
I'm sure some employers would have them do that for free.
Some employers would probably try to find a way to have employees pay them.
And I was just told that, despite police warnings to stay off the roads in Chicago and Northwest Indiana, employers are still pressuring employees to come in for work. Roads are so bad that my mom isn't being allowed to go home from work, yet some employers are insisting employees still drive to work.
Lemme guess, Walmart's one of the bastards telling their employees work's still on, even if its dangerous to travel, right?
Aren't most of those 2000000 employees forced to work less than 30 hours a week so Walmart can avoid paying benefits?
Want to piss off a libturd? Remind them that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. *giggles* ~Cupcakes
What gets me is the end : "it would cause wallmart to fail, whaawhaaa!"(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1493198_677433425621548_2100791406_n.jpg)
The second top comment for this mentions that #3 is incorrect on the math and cue an argument about the validity of the entire pic.
Yep. The person who made the pic can't even do simple addition, how the hell can the rest of that shit be trusted? Don't even get me started on the lack of citation.
Given that Wal-Mart has a sizable presence in other countries, they would have to increase the wages for far less than two million workers. Hell, they have locations in countries with higher minimum wages, and yet they still find a way to make money.Yeah. I've looked at Wal-Mart's business model, and they can definitely afford to pay their workers a living wage.
Fiscal 2012 review and key strategies
Last year, Walmart delivered a strong financial performance. Net sales increased by 5.9 percent to $443.9 billion, and consolidated operating income grew by 4 percent to $26.6 billion. Our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Walmart were $4.54 per share, up from $4.18 the previous year. We leveraged operating expenses for two consecutive years. Our strong financial position is best illustrated by our ability to grow. We added 52.2 million square feet through 1,160 additional units, including acquisitions in the U.K. and South Africa.
Given that Wal-Mart has a sizable presence in other countries, they would have to increase the wages for far less than two million workers. Hell, they have locations in countries with higher minimum wages, and yet they still find a way to make money.
Yeah, here's the thing...Yeah, Henry Ford figured this shit out in the Edwardian Era. Say what you will about him, but he paid his workers enough to buy the cars they made.
Those workers, once they have money, are going to spend money. Probably at Walmart.
So Wallyworld would probably be seeing some of that money come back ANYWAYS. Which means that they'd actually make MORE money by paying their workers more, because said workers would actually be able to afford to spend money.
One of the problems with supply-side economics is when the supply-side forgets that the demand-side has to be able to afford what is being supplied.
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/908d1eb2ffdd81ac096a264a24e3f83b/tumblr_mz1jaa1uzG1r8kiyko1_500.gif)
(http://youngadultliterature.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/chinese_waiter.gif)Hmm, I think I've seen this before.
Okay, children, the word of the day is "racist".
You probably have. It's a pretty infamous cartoon. And this isn't Pat Oliphant's only racist cartoon.(http://youngadultliterature.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/chinese_waiter.gif)Hmm, I think I've seen this before.
Okay, children, the word of the day is "racist".
What's with all these respectable things going crazy? You have well-respected news magazines/TV shows going stupid. You have educational/intellectual cable stations turned into a parade of Nostrodamus, Eric Von Danken jazz & dorky hillbilly non-reality shows. You have good music video stations ditch music & switch to "All Snooki or Snooki-like...all the time". Now, you have well-regarded, respected editorial cartoonists turning wingnut crazy!Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence (or, in this case, the good taste) of the American public.
WHEN WILL IT END?! *AAARRRGLE!* :P
Given that Wal-Mart has a sizable presence in other countries, they would have to increase the wages for far less than two million workers. Hell, they have locations in countries with higher minimum wages, and yet they still find a way to make money.
Yeah, if we assume US-only (fuck you, ASDA workers), then the costs come down to $12.6bn, from the $42.0bn claimed (minuses: 30hr work week, 700,000 non-US workers, added dollar from shite maths in the original).
I haven't really been paying attention to the news. Is the media even really outraged by the whole thing?Some are, some aren't.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/1538952_680959148602309_122321699_n.jpg)"I know you are but what am I?"
That was predictable, and ignoring Christie's antics in the past.
Me: So what's your take on the bridge incident involving Chris Christie?
Conservatoons: Well, at least 2 folks were fired & he took responsibility. More than president Big Zero.
Me: True true, but maybe he'll be lucky like his friend and nothing will come out of it in a year or so. Though I do wonder if he could have done anything sooner to have prevented this. Still, what stands out to me is how similar this incident is to Watergate.
Conservatoons: I don't really see a lot of similarity at all. With Nixon it was the coverup. So far very little coverup that I can see. In fact, Obama has punished his enemies and there constituents far more. Examples are legion.
Me: That wasn't what I was thinking. I believe Nixon was already winning and there was no need for what he was doing, which is same with Christie who already won reelection and there's no need for him to do any sort of payback. Though now that I think about what you said earlier, if Christie gets through this scandal well, this may actually help him politically.
Conservatoons: I am not a Christie fan but if he fire some folks I think he is pretty clean. Media would be happy to provide those folks w/ a soapbox to smear him. I could be wrong, but if Dems go down this road, then the IRS TEA Party thing and NSA Spying are in the news again. Hmmm... Prob better than Obamacare in the news though.
Spoilered for size:Not only can they not speak they can also not even realize they exist.(click to show/hide)
I don't think that's how reproduction works.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_8yBmwXW4XEM/TSdp7WrvObI/AAAAAAAALcg/EbT6cUZ8qMQ/s400/CORRUPT%25252C%2BRACIST%2BUNITED%2BSTATES%25252C%2BOBAMA%2BCARTOONS.jpg)
I have no idea what this even means.
Spoilered for size:Not only can they not speak they can also not even realize they exist.(click to show/hide)
I don't think that's how reproduction works.
Spoilered for size:Not only can they not speak they can also not even realize they exist.(click to show/hide)
I don't think that's how reproduction works.
The saddest part for me is, this person has a lot of artistic potential. And they draw weird shit like this.
Spoilered for size:Not only can they not speak they can also not even realize they exist.(click to show/hide)
I don't think that's how reproduction works.
The saddest part for me is, this person has a lot of artistic potential. And they draw weird shit like this.
The drawing confuses me. Is the manga character holding a fetus inside a fully pressurized amniotic sac? Or, is the fetus shown via artsy x-ray, gestating inside the manga's ribcage, ready to burst out a la Alien?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/1497261_281265075354134_864842154_n.jpg)Actually, the Puckle Gun itself was pretty good by the standards of its time. The problem with it, oddly enough, was bigotry. You see, it had certain barrels that fired square bullets, to be used against non-Christians. This detail was what made it a failure.
I think someone is overlooking the effectiveness of this weapon (i.e. why haven't we heard about this weapon in the first place until now?).
....I don't get it. Why square bullets specifically?
(http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-1.jpg)
Yeah, that's not racist at all.
....I don't get it. Why square bullets specifically?Because they thought it would hurt more.
....I don't get it. Why square bullets specifically?
Puckle demonstrated two versions of the basic design: one, intended for use against Christian enemies, fired conventional round bullets, while the second variant, designed to be used against the Muslim Turks, fired square bullets. The square bullets were considered to be more damaging. They would, according to the patent, convince the Turks of the "benefits of Christian civilization."
....I don't get it. Why square bullets specifically?
Maybe they thought squares were non-Christian kryptonite like Muslims & bacon, I dunno. Sure as heck wouldn't be aerodynamic, that's for sure (unless they were square around the barrel rather than cubes).(http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo-1.jpg)
Yeah, that's not racist at all.
Probably saying Obama's such a bozo that he mistook "walk" the dog for "wok" the dog. Probably still ethnically bigoted, though ('Dog-eating Asians' meets 'Weird African Primitives').
....I don't get it. Why square bullets specifically?
Just from a quick glance at Wikipedia, as my knowledge of pre-Industrial Revolution firearms is quite limited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puckle_gun#Two_versions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puckle_gun#Two_versions)QuotePuckle demonstrated two versions of the basic design: one, intended for use against Christian enemies, fired conventional round bullets, while the second variant, designed to be used against the Muslim Turks, fired square bullets. The square bullets were considered to be more damaging. They would, according to the patent, convince the Turks of the "benefits of Christian civilization."
"Convert or we'll blow a slightly larger, more ragged hole in your chest."
Interesting side-note, I'd heard of the US Army experimenting with square shot loads for shotguns back during Vietnam with the logic being that they would more effectively cut through foliage but I'm fairly sure they abandoned the concept. I think it was because square shot didn't have proper spread, but don't quote me on that.
In all honesty, military development is less careful research and brilliant incites than it is throw the wackiest shit you can think of out there and see what works.That's certainly true sometimes. Look at all the shit DARPA comes up with.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/1497261_281265075354134_864842154_n.jpg)(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/403845_400768606646147_462430692_n.jpg)
I don't understand what you're trying to say.Guns today can easily blow someone's head off from 50 feet, back then the best musket might be able to hit a target at 10.
How is that legal :o
Guns today can easily blow someone's head off from 50 feet, back then the best musket might be able to hit a target at 10.
I feel inadequate.How is that legal :o
It's legal, it's just restricted to hell and back. Rifles like that are collectors items and strictly regulated by the ATF. Also, rounds for those are incredibly rare. I'd rather not have one of those myself because, frankly, I'm not rich enough to be able to shoot it.Guns today can easily blow someone's head off from 50 feet, back then the best musket might be able to hit a target at 10.
Mmm, yes and no. I'll preface this by saying I'm just nosing in here because I enjoy sharing information about an interest of mine.
Your typical musket used in the American Revolution, such as the Brown Bess (used by the British) or the Charleville (used by the Americans) were smooth bore and would be used with under-sized rounds which made them inaccurate, but they still had an effective range of between 50 yards (150 feet) and 100 yards (300 feet). However, the Americans made use of the Longrifle (better known as the Pennsylvania/Kentucky Longrifle) which made use of an elongated barrel of around 4 feet in length as well as being one of the first rifles to commonly use rifling. Their effective range (depending on the experience of the user) was between 100 yards (minimum) to 200+ yards (600 feet). To put this in a little perspective, the military issue back-up iron sight on my AR-15 has a minimum distance setting of 200 meters (656 feet). 50 feet is about the mid to upper range of a typical handgun.
I feel inadequate.
For the lulzI feel inadequate.
How come? :(
I don't understand what you're trying to say.Guns today can easily blow someone's head off from 50 feet, back then the best musket might be able to hit a target at 10.
Why is the President from 2052 a camel? Why would a camel lead a nation full of sapient poodles? Why am I even giving any of this that much thought?
If I was forced to bet money on it, in some weird hypothetical situation, I'd bet men would actually be the group most inclined to let physical attraction influence their vote.Actually, women and men are pretty much equally shallow. It's just that women tend to be less open about it.
Why is the President from 2052 a camel?I don't think he's a camel. The author tends to portray camels as Muslim stereotypes. Like so:
If I was forced to bet money on it, in some weird hypothetical situation, I'd bet men would actually be the group most inclined to let physical attraction influence their vote.Actually, women and men are pretty much equally shallow. It's just that women tend to be less open about it.
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/619/827/c34.png)Transphobes are passive aggressive.
Fucking transphobes...
By the way, this is something called "Lone Nut Comics". An apt name, don't you think? But don't go around thinking he's just another misogynistic, religiously intolerant asshole. He's also a racist.OOOOOO! The alligator is a metaphor for niggers, that is so clever and intelligent!
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uIxF5aoutMs/TT4oyaVfqQI/AAAAAAAAAIM/QDIa7PZBFEE/s1600/Hoax+Crime+%252820-Jan-2011%2529.png)
And the record scratched.Huh?
Scratched records repeat so Zach is saying (well, I think he is.) that the cartoon or the guy who makes them is repeating themselves.And the record scratched.Huh?
That is the most horrifying thing I have heard today.Scratched records repeat so Zach is saying (well, I think he is.) that the cartoon or the guy who makes them is repeating themselves.And the record scratched.Huh?
Scratched records repeat so Zach is saying (well, I think he is.) that the cartoon or the guy who makes them is repeating themselves.And the record scratched.Huh?
Well that was what the person who made it meant and saying the blatantly racist comic hated younge African American men would sound overly washed down.Scratched records repeat so Zach is saying (well, I think he is.) that the cartoon or the guy who makes them is repeating themselves.And the record scratched.Huh?
Actually I'm not saying that, but I will give it that it's vague except in my brain.
Effectively, records scratch when they are stopped. Records are stopped when something shocking happens.
Mostly, I was reacting to lizard using the n-word like that :P
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NUzrnqUgI2E/TBEcW8pIjrI/AAAAAAAAAFQ/7orQmHthUPM/s1600/Lone-Nut3.png)There's so much stupidity in this cartoon, I don't know where to begin.
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NUzrnqUgI2E/TBEcW8pIjrI/AAAAAAAAAFQ/7orQmHthUPM/s1600/Lone-Nut3.png)There's so much stupidity in this cartoon, I don't know where to begin.
1. Those are hardly exclusively masculine traits.
2. By the standards of Ancient Greece, Sparta was feminist.
3. Socrates respected women, unlike many of his fellow Athenians.
4. Archimedes was a proponent of educating girls.
5. Testosterone poisoning is just making jokes about over-the-top masculinity.
So, is Ernie from Sesame Street Einstein, now?I'm pretty sure that's a reference to Archimedes discovering displacement while taking a bath.
THE GREAT GENIUS OF....RUBBER DUCKIES!
Testosterone is the sex hormone, as in desire for. It was first discovered in the testes, hence the name. Androgen makes men masculine, physically. Women's bodies produce testosterone and estrogen. Men's bodies produce testosterone and androgen.You know these misogynistic types, they wouldn't know real biology if it bit them on the ass.
Testosterone is the sex hormone, as in desire for. It was first discovered in the testes, hence the name. Androgen makes men masculine, physically. Women's bodies produce testosterone and estrogen. Men's bodies produce testosterone and androgen.
So, is Ernie from Sesame Street Einstein, now?I'm pretty sure that's a reference to Archimedes discovering displacement while taking a bath.
THE GREAT GENIUS OF....RUBBER DUCKIES!
Testosterone is the sex hormone, as in desire for. It was first discovered in the testes, hence the name. Androgen makes men masculine, physically. Women's bodies produce testosterone and estrogen. Men's bodies produce testosterone and androgen.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/1601325_10152125217118419_253376756_n.jpg)
For the police you would have had time time to realize that dark figure walking around is your son.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/1512742_10152125214818419_2086906877_n.jpg)
I agree, a person armed with .9mm could easily do a backflip to avoid oncoming bullets, cartwheel towards some cover, then do a duel wielding run across the run dual wielding across the bank, taking out both heavily armed and prepared robbers.
Action movies are real life right?
Why is Mallard green-headed in the top strips (like male mallards are), but black-headed in the bottom?
I know, very relevant to the subject, but I'm OCD that way.
Why is Mallard green-headed in the top strips (like male mallards are), but black-headed in the bottom?I don't think comic strips are always colored by the same people.
I know, very relevant to the subject, but I'm OCD that way.
Well at least I know it wasn't unfounded to think it was Daffy Duck.Maybe not completely unfounded, but I don't understand why you would think that in the first place. After all, Daffy is actually funny.
I think UP was trying to make a joke about how unfunny the comic was.
Whoever this guy is (I can't read his fucking signature) he's an entitled asswipe.Glenn mcoy
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/1558501_284066998407275_1884288578_n.jpg)Easy. The Civil Rights Act.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/1558501_284066998407275_1884288578_n.jpg)While democrats have made great strides in helping end the income gap between blacks and whites we still need to work to end racism on a greater scale.
I think this comic explains why Lone Nut choose for alligators to be the stand in for black people: Cannibalism jokes.We should feed white people to alligators.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uIxF5aoutMs/TAc0jprZHZI/AAAAAAAAAGM/s1Xya4gIMF8/s1600/The%2BDarwin%2BRewards%2B(01-Jun-2010).png)
Why is Mallard green-headed in the top strips (like male mallards are), but black-headed in the bottom?
I know, very relevant to the subject, but I'm OCD that way.
I think it's because the top takes place at night in the dark and the bottom takes place in the sunlight or something.
One of those weird "We screw around with colors to show that it's dark while still making the characters visible" things.
(http://stonethepreacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/josef-mengele.jpg)
Yes, yes it was.
I also picked up some homoerotic vibes between David and Jonathan.
Up until the last two sentences, the Strawman is right on the mark. Besides, there is evidence of same-sex love being accepted and even celebrated: even in the Old Testament. Look at the story of Ruth and Naomi, and just try to tell me "Where you go, there shall I go also; where you lodge, there shall I rest my head; your people shall be my people, and your God my God. Where you die, so shall I fall, and I shall be buried beside you"(paraphrased, too lazy to look it up) means something other than "I love you, and I'll prove it." And that's not all: these two women apparently spend the entire rest of their lives together, and even when when Ruth has Obed, it's Naomi's reaction that makes the book, not Boaz'. Yeah, I know, "thye wert fUCKIN and thats why GOD hates TEH GAYYS", but the idea that the only way two people can have a deep romantic relationship is by constantly bumpin' uglies is a pretty sure sign that the person saying that has no real clue how human relationships work.And consider the Bibles protagonist is a male carpenter who kisses other men, and spent most of his life around some men...
(I just have a lot of Ruthomi feels okay)
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1/s261x260/1544505_700081160032175_2124944762_n.jpg)
Can someone say "phony"? (bad pun on my part)
(http://www.gcmwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gay-preacher1.jpg)
Media Matters reports she didn't so much as saw a live video of it as much as she was on the telephone about it.(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1/s261x260/1544505_700081160032175_2124944762_n.jpg)
Can someone say "phony"? (bad pun on my part)
Maybe I've missed the whole point of this controversy, but I thought it wasn't not knowing about it that was the problem, but the fact that the nearest US troops were 12 hours away and couldn't have gotten there in time to do anything, never mind that US soldiers entering Libya probably would cause a hell of a lot more problems.
Up until the last two sentences, the Strawman is right on the mark. Besides, there is evidence of same-sex love being accepted and even celebrated: even in the Old Testament. Look at the story of Ruth and Naomi, and just try to tell me "Where you go, there shall I go also; where you lodge, there shall I rest my head; your people shall be my people, and your God my God. Where you die, so shall I fall, and I shall be buried beside you"(paraphrased, too lazy to look it up) means something other than "I love you, and I'll prove it." And that's not all: these two women apparently spend the entire rest of their lives together, and even when when Ruth has Obed, it's Naomi's reaction that makes the book, not Boaz'. Yeah, I know, "thye wert fUCKIN and thats why GOD hates TEH GAYYS", but the idea that the only way two people can have a deep romantic relationship is by constantly bumpin' uglies is a pretty sure sign that the person saying that has no real clue how human relationships work.And consider the Bibles protagonist is a male carpenter who kisses other men, and spent most of his life around some men...
(I just have a lot of Ruthomi feels okay)
The alleged anti-gay verses were likely poorly-translated injunctions against pederasty & temple prostitution (the later due to sex slavery, not 'Sacred sex is evil').
(http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2014/027/6/0/government_monitoring_by_conservatoons-d740ppd.jpg)
Ironic much?
You either die a hero...The alleged anti-gay verses were likely poorly-translated injunctions against pederasty & temple prostitution (the later due to sex slavery, not 'Sacred sex is evil').
More likely because they were a major part of rival religions - same as alcohol and idols/graven images.
You either die a hero...The alleged anti-gay verses were likely poorly-translated injunctions against pederasty & temple prostitution (the later due to sex slavery, not 'Sacred sex is evil').
More likely because they were a major part of rival religions - same as alcohol and idols/graven images.
YayYou either die a hero...The alleged anti-gay verses were likely poorly-translated injunctions against pederasty & temple prostitution (the later due to sex slavery, not 'Sacred sex is evil').
More likely because they were a major part of rival religions - same as alcohol and idols/graven images.
...or watch yourself become Two-Face?
Doesn't help that he gave the girl on the right black face.Or that the scientist looks like a Jewish stereotype. Ordinarily, I would barely notice, but considering the racist content of the cartoon, I'm not willing to let it slide.
You know, it's too bad terrorists don't actually walk around with Praise Allah shirts and wires all hanging out, otherwise that comic might have had a point.
The second one still not nice to stareOn all the other days of the year they spit and throw rocks on him.
(https://24.media.tumblr.com/83604e6ff3e341a6a4e90d9c077b747e/tumblr_mxij827Pfm1r9gz3io1_500.jpg)What is the point of them doing that?
The racist moral of the story: the more "pure" crackers there are, the more the Evil Jewish Overlords sweat.
It's part of a conspiracy theory claiming that Jews are using our control of the media to encourage miscegenation with the goal of breeding the white race out of existence.Did they ever consider that I DON'T CARE?
It's not controlled by the Jews.Yeah, but do you expect an anti-Semite to understand that?
It's not controlled by the Jews.Yeah, but do you expect an anti-Semite to understand that?
"Illegals."
Classy.
"Illegals."
Classy.
Of course, the great irony being that immigration reform would help people become legal citizens.
Who vote democrat"Your choices are: The party who, after taking a decade to (kinda) warm up to you only gives you some token gifts, or the party who gives you food, water, shelter, and some money?"
"Illegals."
Classy.
Of course, the great irony being that immigration reform would help people become legal citizens.
Ah, but it's not really illegal immigration these people are concerned about. What scares them is brown people.
From Single Asian Female, or as I like to call it, Single Horrible Webcomic:Oh yeah, I read about this in TVTropes: So Bad It's Horrible.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20070118032935/http://www.safcomic.com/images/comics/Sellout.gif)
"It's his racial duty to continue his pure Asian bloodline!"
Hamas doesn't use kids otherwise they would lose the democratic support in Gaza also female suicide bombers either work alone or go with her husband probably willinglyI believe female bombers are generally revenge-motivated.
From Single Asian Female, or as I like to call it, Single Horrible Webcomic:
(https://web.archive.org/web/20070118032935/http://www.safcomic.com/images/comics/Sellout.gif)
"It's his racial duty to continue his pure Asian bloodline!"
the internalized misogyny and racism in that comicActually, I'm pretty sure it's done by a man.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1/1186704_288934304587211_726394289_n.jpg)
Dear "Things Liberals Hate",
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HEh2auCRBAk/TGvmBaZTUjI/AAAAAAAABok/3Z_2MDlWVbo/s400/ObamaHusseinCartoon.jpg)
<giant 'THIS IS NOT NORMAL' picture>
That person's left leg is what caught my attention. It looks like it's bending back a little too far from a normal 'locked knee' position.<giant 'THIS IS NOT NORMAL' picture>
The only thing possibly NOT NORMAL about this person is that they look a little on the dangerously skinny side. Some people are just naturally skinny, and it might jsut be the way their legs look in those killer high heels, but they look almost bony. That's the only 'not normal' thing that concerns me in this picture--that the person pictured might have some medical problem.
I'd say s/he's double jointed. My knees do the same thing, though not quite to that degree.That person's left leg is what caught my attention. It looks like it's bending back a little too far from a normal 'locked knee' position.<giant 'THIS IS NOT NORMAL' picture>
The only thing possibly NOT NORMAL about this person is that they look a little on the dangerously skinny side. Some people are just naturally skinny, and it might jsut be the way their legs look in those killer high heels, but they look almost bony. That's the only 'not normal' thing that concerns me in this picture--that the person pictured might have some medical problem.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1/1186704_288934304587211_726394289_n.jpg)
Normal is overrated.Don't let conservatives define what is normal because that is what led to homosexuality being classified as a mental disorder until the APA forced them out and made the DSM-II homosexuality revision.
From Single Asian Female, or as I like to call it, Single Horrible Webcomic:lol its a web archive link. As the saying goes, "and nothing of value was lost". I actually read though some of that comic. I initially thought was racist towards Asians, upon further reading I realized that it’s racist towards everybody. At least the author is doing his best to die alone.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20070118032935/http://www.safcomic.com/images/comics/Sellout.gif)
"It's his racial duty to continue his pure Asian bloodline!"
This is an Israeli rap video by the organization Lehava (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehava) against Jewish Israeli women marrying Arab men. There are a quite a few of these organizations that encourage other people to snitch on people involved in such relationships in the name of "protecting and rescuing Jewish women." (The opposite situation never seems to appear in their rhetoric.) I don't know Hebrew and can't translate this, but it really speaks for itself. Apparently it aired on television.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3_xdN13q0Q
This is an Israeli rap video by the organization Lehava (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehava) against Jewish Israeli women marrying Arab men. There are a quite a few of these organizations that encourage other people to snitch on people involved in such relationships in the name of "protecting and rescuing Jewish women." (The opposite situation never seems to appear in their rhetoric.) I don't know Hebrew and can't translate this, but it really speaks for itself. Apparently it aired on television.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3_xdN13q0Q
This is an Israeli rap video by the organization Lehava (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehava) against Jewish Israeli women marrying Arab men. There are a quite a few of these organizations that encourage other people to snitch on people involved in such relationships in the name of "protecting and rescuing Jewish women." (The opposite situation never seems to appear in their rhetoric.) I don't know Hebrew and can't translate this, but it really speaks for itself. Apparently it aired on television.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3_xdN13q0Q
Fuck those people.
Hey, you know Hebrew... do you understand any of the lyrics or text on the screen? :P
From Single Asian Female, or as I like to call it, Single Horrible Webcomic:
(https://web.archive.org/web/20070118032935/http://www.safcomic.com/images/comics/Sellout.gif)
"It's his racial duty to continue his pure Asian bloodline!"
From Single Asian Female, or as I like to call it, Single Horrible Webcomic:
(https://web.archive.org/web/20070118032935/http://www.safcomic.com/images/comics/Sellout.gif)
"It's his racial duty to continue his pure Asian bloodline!"
Maybe he likes short chicks, ever think of that Ms. Miscegenation? Because that's what you're bitching about. The watchword of such grand groups as the KKK and Stormfront.
This is an Israeli rap video by the organization Lehava (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehava) against Jewish Israeli women marrying Arab men. There are a quite a few of these organizations that encourage other people to snitch on people involved in such relationships in the name of "protecting and rescuing Jewish women." (The opposite situation never seems to appear in their rhetoric.) I don't know Hebrew and can't translate this, but it really speaks for itself. Apparently it aired on television.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3_xdN13q0Q
"protecting and rescuing Jewish women." (The opposite situation never seems to appear in their rhetoric.)
(http://egoist.blogspot.com/AffirmativeRacism-E.gif)
You don't know what that means, do you? It's "race-based", not "race-exclusive".
Well, from what I see, it's comparing Affirmative Action to the times when colleges banned people based on religion and ethnicity. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms of AA, but this is just plain dumb.(http://egoist.blogspot.com/AffirmativeRacism-E.gif)
You don't know what that means, do you? It's "race-based", not "race-exclusive".
I see it as:
NEWSPAPER: Affirmative Action OK.
KLAN KLOWNS: Hey, Cletus! Lets start our own college so we can exclude non-whites!
I could be wrong but my interpretation wouldn't make it "Worst Political Cartoon" material.
Maybe I'm missing something.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1/1010817_291567807657194_1927633023_n.jpg)
Well, from what I see, it's comparing Affirmative Action to the times when colleges banned people based on religion and ethnicity. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms of AA, but this is just plain dumb.(http://egoist.blogspot.com/AffirmativeRacism-E.gif)
You don't know what that means, do you? It's "race-based", not "race-exclusive".
I see it as:
NEWSPAPER: Affirmative Action OK.
KLAN KLOWNS: Hey, Cletus! Lets start our own college so we can exclude non-whites!
I could be wrong but my interpretation wouldn't make it "Worst Political Cartoon" material.
Maybe I'm missing something.
(http://i.imgur.com/SgSEnmy.jpg)
What the hell is a "Christianist"?
But more important, people have died because of fanatical atheists. Look at Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.
(http://i.imgur.com/SgSEnmy.jpg)
What the hell is a "Christianist"?
But more important, people have died because of fanatical atheists. Look at Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.
(http://i.imgur.com/SgSEnmy.jpg)
What the hell is a "Christianist"?
But more important, people have died because of fanatical atheists. Look at Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.
Militant Muslims and Christians kill for their religion and their beliefs. Stalin, Mao etc did not kill in the name of atheism. They were tyrannical dictators who killed and purged people who decided to oppose them. There have been religious leaders in history who have done the same. In this case it has nothing to do with religious beliefs and more to do with power, fear and control.
...Incidentally, I'm wondering what a militant pagan would look like.
Am I saying Atheism is inherently evil? Of course not. What I'm saying is that Atheism cannot claim any inherent moral superiority, any more than Christianity or Islam.
Most don't. I was just speaking of the vocal minority.Am I saying Atheism is inherently evil? Of course not. What I'm saying is that Atheism cannot claim any inherent moral superiority, any more than Christianity or Islam.
Do most atheists claim that they're morally superior to theists?
Am I saying Atheism is inherently evil? Of course not. What I'm saying is that Atheism cannot claim any inherent moral superiority, any more than Christianity or Islam.
That's certainly true. On the other hand, there are a number of religious people who can claim moral superiority over atheists. Giuseppe Garibaldi can certainly claim moral superiority over Tomas de Torquemada, but on the other hand, Pope Francis can claim moral superiority over Leon Trotsky.Am I saying Atheism is inherently evil? Of course not. What I'm saying is that Atheism cannot claim any inherent moral superiority, any more than Christianity or Islam.
You're right, in that atheism cannot claim any moral superiority because it is simply the lack of belief in god, so there isn't a set of morals attached to atheism by default. But a ton of atheists, agnostics, humanists certainly CAN claim moral superiority to a group that believes that if you cross their vengeful god you will be sent to hell to be tortured forever.
Do you know what he meant by "opiates of the masses?"I didn't know the context. You learn something new every day. However, that doesn't change the fact that communism has frequently been opposed to religion. Look at the Soviet repression of the Russian Orthodox Church, or Hoxa expelling religious leaders, or Pol Pot sending the religious to die in the killing fields.
Here's the actual quote.
"Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."
Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
A criticism of religion? Yeah, but what he was basically saying is that due to economic woes the masses being the down trodden, the poor and the unwealthy, turn to religion for solace. He's not necessarily saying down with religion, but saying that it shouldn't be a crutch for people to lean on during tough times. Marx, of course wanted everyone to be equal, if everyone wasn't suffering they wouldn't rely on just their religion to get out of it and maybe actually, do something.
I can understand why you would think that. And you'd probably be right if we were talking about, say, Mussolini or Than Shwe. However, there's one problem with that theory. These people were communists, and communism is, by nature, opposed to religion. Marx himself called religion "the opiate of the masses".
You're missing my point. While they were partially motivated by power, it would be dishonest to say that was the sole motivator. If it was, I think they'd have been more likely to pack those institutions with their supporters, rather than try to dismantle them altogether.
Also stop praising Pope Francis he's not a good person. Ask SigmaWhat makes you say that?
...Incidentally, I'm wondering what a militant pagan would look like.
(http://static3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090813062539/mythology/images/5/54/Kratos(3).jpg)
He among others expressed disgust over Malta adopting gay adoptionAlso stop praising Pope Francis he's not a good person. Ask SigmaWhat makes you say that?
By the way, I found an example of somebody who indisputably hated religion. His name was Tomás Garrido Canabal, and he was a prominent figure in the Mexican Revolution. Look him up.
In part, yes, in the same way that Ivan the Terrible was partly motivated by Christianity (more specifically, Russian Orthodoxy), or Talaat Pasha was partly motivated by Sunni Islam.
By the way, I found an example of somebody who indisputably hated religion. His name was Tomás Garrido Canabal, and he was a prominent figure in the Mexican Revolution. Look him up.
By the way, I found an example of somebody who indisputably hated religion. His name was Tomás Garrido Canabal, and he was a prominent figure in the Mexican Revolution. Look him up.
QuoteBy the way, I found an example of somebody who indisputably hated religion. His name was Tomás Garrido Canabal, and he was a prominent figure in the Mexican Revolution. Look him up.
I know an example of someone who indisputably hates religion, too. He calls himself Chagen...ain't that a coinkydink? Seriously, though, for every legitimate headcase of an anti-theist that gains authority, you can find a baker's dozen of the same thing amongst the religious. Every group has their nuts. The Spanish Inquisition wasn't started by atheists. Manifest Destiny wasn't inspired by atheism. The leaders of the Crusades would have been more likely to outright kill an atheist rather than be in the same square kilometer as one.
The religious have done evil. The non-religious have done evil, too. However, the non-religious have, to my knowledge, perpetrated less evil overall. Doesn't make us better, but it sure as hell don't make us worse.
Religious texts also contain a lot of good stuff. It's like fire, which can be used to cook food for the homeless, or to cook the homeless for food.QuoteBy the way, I found an example of somebody who indisputably hated religion. His name was Tomás Garrido Canabal, and he was a prominent figure in the Mexican Revolution. Look him up.
I know an example of someone who indisputably hates religion, too. He calls himself Chagen...ain't that a coinkydink? Seriously, though, for every legitimate headcase of an anti-theist that gains authority, you can find a baker's dozen of the same thing amongst the religious. Every group has their nuts. The Spanish Inquisition wasn't started by atheists. Manifest Destiny wasn't inspired by atheism. The leaders of the Crusades would have been more likely to outright kill an atheist rather than be in the same square kilometer as one.
The religious have done evil. The non-religious have done evil, too. However, the non-religious have, to my knowledge, perpetrated less evil overall. Doesn't make us better, but it sure as hell don't make us worse.
That, and the non-religious don't have an entire book that is the central tenet of their belief system that contains a bunch of evil shit they can borrow from.
Religious texts also contain a lot of good stuff. It's like fire, which can be used to cook food for the homeless, or to cook the homeless for food.QuoteBy the way, I found an example of somebody who indisputably hated religion. His name was Tomás Garrido Canabal, and he was a prominent figure in the Mexican Revolution. Look him up.
I know an example of someone who indisputably hates religion, too. He calls himself Chagen...ain't that a coinkydink? Seriously, though, for every legitimate headcase of an anti-theist that gains authority, you can find a baker's dozen of the same thing amongst the religious. Every group has their nuts. The Spanish Inquisition wasn't started by atheists. Manifest Destiny wasn't inspired by atheism. The leaders of the Crusades would have been more likely to outright kill an atheist rather than be in the same square kilometer as one.
The religious have done evil. The non-religious have done evil, too. However, the non-religious have, to my knowledge, perpetrated less evil overall. Doesn't make us better, but it sure as hell don't make us worse.
That, and the non-religious don't have an entire book that is the central tenet of their belief system that contains a bunch of evil shit they can borrow from.
Which institution do you think is best equipped to raise children?
(http://i.minus.com/j2oUv9i57aWy3.gif)
(http://i.minus.com/j2oUv9i57aWy3.gif)
They both look like happy families to me.
(http://i.minus.com/jb0owV9pI1ZCoH.gif)
Not every family has the time to make breakfast in the morning. And there's nothing wrong with that.
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1/1920253_698119770219580_1011130995_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1/1920253_698119770219580_1011130995_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t31/s720x720/1026130_673923545996467_1192607164_o.png)Hitler only wanted to disarm the jews.
From a page called "The Tea Party," natch. I gotta say I find it funny that Obama's giving a subtle middle finger in the picture of him, though. That's how I feel about people who post shit like this. Incidentally, the two Facebook folk who shared this (that I still "follow" are both relatives.
I may be wrong, but I'm fairly sure neither Gandhi, nor MLK ever said anything either supporting or condemning gun ownership...I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume MLK would have wanted to get rid of gun ownership considering the amount of deaths guns had been responsible for in the black community.
I may be wrong, but I'm fairly sure neither Gandhi, nor MLK ever said anything either supporting or condemning gun ownership...Actually, if I remember correctly, Gandhi complained about Britain forcibly disarming its Indian subjects. And according to the Huffington Post, MLK was also opposed to gun control.
Most people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the mid-1950s, as the civil rights movement heated up, King kept firearms for self-protection. In fact, he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
A recipient of constant death threats, King had armed supporters take turns guarding his home and family. He had good reason to fear that the Klan in Alabama was targeting him for assassination.
William Worthy, a journalist who covered the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, reported that once, during a visit to King's parsonage, he went to sit down on an armchair in the living room and, to his surprise, almost sat on a loaded gun. Glenn Smiley, an adviser to King, described King's home as "an arsenal."
True, but with the first one it was "Forcibly disarming" not "suggesting prohibiting people currently on a killing spree from buying ammunition" and for the second I can think of *COUGH*STANDYOURGROUND*COUGH*I may be wrong, but I'm fairly sure neither Gandhi, nor MLK ever said anything either supporting or condemning gun ownership...Actually, if I remember correctly, Gandhi complained about Britain forcibly disarming its Indian subjects. And according to the Huffington Post, MLK was also opposed to gun control.QuoteMost people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the mid-1950s, as the civil rights movement heated up, King kept firearms for self-protection. In fact, he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
A recipient of constant death threats, King had armed supporters take turns guarding his home and family. He had good reason to fear that the Klan in Alabama was targeting him for assassination.
William Worthy, a journalist who covered the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, reported that once, during a visit to King's parsonage, he went to sit down on an armchair in the living room and, to his surprise, almost sat on a loaded gun. Glenn Smiley, an adviser to King, described King's home as "an arsenal."
It should be remembered that back then, "gun control" all too often equated to "black control". MLK was denied a concealed-carry permit for no reason other than the color of his skin.True, but with the first one it was "Forcibly disarming" not "suggesting prohibiting people currently on a killing spree from buying ammunition" and for the second I can think of *COUGH*STANDYOURGROUND*COUGH*I may be wrong, but I'm fairly sure neither Gandhi, nor MLK ever said anything either supporting or condemning gun ownership...Actually, if I remember correctly, Gandhi complained about Britain forcibly disarming its Indian subjects. And according to the Huffington Post, MLK was also opposed to gun control.QuoteMost people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the mid-1950s, as the civil rights movement heated up, King kept firearms for self-protection. In fact, he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
A recipient of constant death threats, King had armed supporters take turns guarding his home and family. He had good reason to fear that the Klan in Alabama was targeting him for assassination.
William Worthy, a journalist who covered the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, reported that once, during a visit to King's parsonage, he went to sit down on an armchair in the living room and, to his surprise, almost sat on a loaded gun. Glenn Smiley, an adviser to King, described King's home as "an arsenal."
Say, if we want to pass some gun control then all we need to do is convince the NRA that black people will own guns.It should be remembered that back then, "gun control" all too often equated to "black control". MLK was denied a concealed-carry permit for no reason other than the color of his skin.True, but with the first one it was "Forcibly disarming" not "suggesting prohibiting people currently on a killing spree from buying ammunition" and for the second I can think of *COUGH*STANDYOURGROUND*COUGH*I may be wrong, but I'm fairly sure neither Gandhi, nor MLK ever said anything either supporting or condemning gun ownership...Actually, if I remember correctly, Gandhi complained about Britain forcibly disarming its Indian subjects. And according to the Huffington Post, MLK was also opposed to gun control.QuoteMost people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the mid-1950s, as the civil rights movement heated up, King kept firearms for self-protection. In fact, he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
A recipient of constant death threats, King had armed supporters take turns guarding his home and family. He had good reason to fear that the Klan in Alabama was targeting him for assassination.
William Worthy, a journalist who covered the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, reported that once, during a visit to King's parsonage, he went to sit down on an armchair in the living room and, to his surprise, almost sat on a loaded gun. Glenn Smiley, an adviser to King, described King's home as "an arsenal."
...That's dangerously close to Godwin's Law. Why do you say the NRA is racist?They know what they did.
Care to elaborate?...That's dangerously close to Godwin's Law. Why do you say the NRA is racist?They know what they did.
noCare to elaborate?...That's dangerously close to Godwin's Law. Why do you say the NRA is racist?They know what they did.
If you won't answer the question, I'm gonna have to assume you're wrong.Or will you?????
...That's dangerously close to Godwin's Law. Why do you say the NRA is racist?
(http://m.motherjones.com/files/imagecache/node-gallery-display/photoessays/20100912_zaf_mv2_008.jpg)
(http://aattp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/racist-obamacare.jpg)
(http://aattp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/racist-hang-in-there-obama.jpg)
Nope, no racism here. Damn race-baitin' libruls!
I was, in fact, snarking at Ultie and his tendency to say "Hey, what's wrong with Tea Baggers/MRAs/etc? They have some good points!" And "our little creampuff" is the cutest nickname I've ever had UwU.Were any of those done by the NRA? There are certainly some racists who oppose Obama just because he's black, but that doesn't mean that all opposition to his policies is based on something that petty.
Or have you forgotten the shit the democrats used to say about Dubya?What, that he led the country into not one but two unnecessary conflicts in the Middle East? Or that started many of the programs that are now somehow Obama's fault? Yeah, every tray of fudge has its nuts, but your continued insistence of "we're not all like that!!!! dems have said stupid stuff too!!!!!" is what's pissing me off. I think you're trying to be a gadfly/conservative's advocate, but from where I'm sitting you just look like a troll.
I was, in fact, snarking at Ultie and his tendency to say "Hey, what's wrong with Tea Baggers/MRAs/etc? They have some good points!" And "our little creampuff" is the cutest nickname I've ever had UwU.Were any of those done by the NRA? There are certainly some racists who oppose Obama just because he's black, but that doesn't mean that all opposition to his policies is based on something that petty.
... if someone's black or a woman and is a Republican, it's fucking open season on them. Double standards, and all that shit.Yeah, that's one thing that must be pointed out. Not every conservative woman is Phyllis Schlafly, and while I may disagree with Herman Cain on a lot of things, there's no evidence that he's a self-loathing black man. Out of touch with racial issues, yes, but not self-hating.
Look at all those bullshit conspiracy theories about how he "stole" either of his elections.
Look at the idiots who claim he lied about Iraqi WMDs
Bush was far from perfect, but he wasn't the monstrous ignoramus you claim him to be.
Well, where's your evidence? If Dubya did lie about the WMDs, you'd think it would be the biggest presidential scandal since Watergate. And yet, there's nothing.Look at the idiots who claim he lied about Iraqi WMDs
Yeah! Accusing the president of something he, objectively, provably, did! What assholes! That's exactly the same as making up a bunch of racist lies about someone!
I agree, Bush fucked up more than is acceptable. However, there were a number of elected regimes that were just as bad, if not worse.QuoteBush was far from perfect, but he wasn't the monstrous ignoramus you claim him to be.
It would be quite hard to find an elected executive anywhere in the world that was as vicious, ignorant, hubristic and ultimately disastrous as the Bush administration. I don't think there was a single area of policy that they didn't both deliberately corrupt and accidentally fuck up in equal measure at least fifty million times. They couldn't even order around rescue choppers without fucking it up, blaming someone else and trying to profit politically.
*jaw on the floor*Congrats, Ultie. You broke Ironbite. Lemme repeat that just to let it sink in: You. Broke. Ironbite. Hope you're proud. *sarcastic clap*
You...you....
Ironbite-*walks away*
From what I've seen, he was already defective.*jaw on the floor*Congrats, Ultie. You broke Ironbite. Lemme repeat that just to let it sink in: You. Broke. Ironbite. Hope you're proud. *sarcastic clap*
You...you....
Ironbite-*walks away*
8====================DWant me to go Lorena Bobbitt on your cock?
(http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/RUDE.gif)From what I've seen, he was already defective.*jaw on the floor*Congrats, Ultie. You broke Ironbite. Lemme repeat that just to let it sink in: You. Broke. Ironbite. Hope you're proud. *sarcastic clap*
You...you....
Ironbite-*walks away*
You know what else is rude? Biting my head off for daring to have a different opinion.(http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/RUDE.gif)From what I've seen, he was already defective.*jaw on the floor*Congrats, Ultie. You broke Ironbite. Lemme repeat that just to let it sink in: You. Broke. Ironbite. Hope you're proud. *sarcastic clap*
You...you....
Ironbite-*walks away*
You know what else is rude? Biting my head off for daring to have a different opinion.(http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/RUDE.gif)From what I've seen, he was already defective.*jaw on the floor*Congrats, Ultie. You broke Ironbite. Lemme repeat that just to let it sink in: You. Broke. Ironbite. Hope you're proud. *sarcastic clap*
You...you....
Ironbite-*walks away*
What? How was I biting your head off for having a different opinion? Or is "presenting evidence that contradicts someone's beliefs" now considered overly violent? And FYI, I don't care that you're "daring" to have a different opinion. I care that you're going into damn near every thread and saying "Nuh-uh! Nuh-uh!" just for the sake of shitstirring.You know what else is rude? Biting my head off for daring to have a different opinion.(http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/RUDE.gif)From what I've seen, he was already defective.*jaw on the floor*Congrats, Ultie. You broke Ironbite. Lemme repeat that just to let it sink in: You. Broke. Ironbite. Hope you're proud. *sarcastic clap*
You...you....
Ironbite-*walks away*
You're in desperate need of a reality check. I don't stir shit up for the sake of it, otherwise I'd be acting like a fundie of some kind. I just disagree with you... because I disagree with you. I've agreed with you on a number of things. Listen up: just because somebody has a different opinion from you, doesn't automatically mean they're mentally or morally deficient. I don't shit on you for having different opinions, so why can't you return the favor?Because you're factually incorrect, and you're being an ass about it. That's why. And even if you were %100 correct about everything that you ever posted (the MRA thread makes this unlikely, but let bygones and all that), that wouldn't justify being a douchebag.
1. You haven't offered any actual evidence, other than "reasons".You're in desperate need of a reality check. I don't stir shit up for the sake of it, otherwise I'd be acting like a fundie of some kind. I just disagree with you... because I disagree with you. I've agreed with you on a number of things. Listen up: just because somebody has a different opinion from you, doesn't automatically mean they're mentally or morally deficient. I don't shit on you for having different opinions, so why can't you return the favor?Because you're factually incorrect, and you're being an ass about it. That's why.
You're in desperate need of a reality check.
2. You want to see an ass? Look in the mirror.
From what I've seen, he [Ironbite] was already defective.
Well, where's your evidence? If Dubya did lie about the WMDs, you'd think it would be the biggest presidential scandal since Watergate.Look at the idiots who claim he lied about Iraqi WMDs
Yeah! Accusing the president of something he, objectively, provably, did! What assholes! That's exactly the same as making up a bunch of racist lies about someone!
I agree, Bush fucked up more than is acceptable. However, there were a number of elected regimes that were just as bad, if not worse.QuoteBush was far from perfect, but he wasn't the monstrous ignoramus you claim him to be.
It would be quite hard to find an elected executive anywhere in the world that was as vicious, ignorant, hubristic and ultimately disastrous as the Bush administration. I don't think there was a single area of policy that they didn't both deliberately corrupt and accidentally fuck up in equal measure at least fifty million times. They couldn't even order around rescue choppers without fucking it up, blaming someone else and trying to profit politically.
-Hugo Chavez
-Vladimir Putin
-Robert Mugabe
-Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
-Ferdinand Marcos
All wrong of course. The Venezuelan economy, for instance, is growing nicely.That's illusory growth, like in the Weimar Republic.
(http://plus4chan.org/boards/jam/src/127324768473.gif)I don't see anything.
I know I was being unkind, but you got that ball rolling. Don't try to take the moral high ground.Translation: (http://www.troll.me/images/party-dogs/he-started-it.jpg)
Am I not entitled to self-defense?I know I was being unkind, but you got that ball rolling. Don't try to take the moral high ground.Translation: (http://www.troll.me/images/party-dogs/he-started-it.jpg)
All wrong of course. The Venezuelan economy, for instance, is growing nicely.That's illusory growth, like in the Weimar Republic.
Am I not entitled to self-defense?I know I was being unkind, but you got that ball rolling. Don't try to take the moral high ground.Translation: (http://www.troll.me/images/party-dogs/he-started-it.jpg)
Self-defense, sure. Blame-shifting is a different cat entirely.Am I not entitled to self-defense?I know I was being unkind, but you got that ball rolling. Don't try to take the moral high ground.Translation: (http://www.troll.me/images/party-dogs/he-started-it.jpg)
You're the expert on blame-shifting.Self-defense, sure. Blame-shifting is a different cat entirely.Am I not entitled to self-defense?I know I was being unkind, but you got that ball rolling. Don't try to take the moral high ground.Translation: (http://www.troll.me/images/party-dogs/he-started-it.jpg)
You're the expert on blame-shifting.Self-defense, sure. Blame-shifting is a different cat entirely.Am I not entitled to self-defense?I know I was being unkind, but you got that ball rolling. Don't try to take the moral high ground.Translation: (http://www.troll.me/images/party-dogs/he-started-it.jpg)
MOD MODE: I'm going to quote a very wise person who once was a great presence in these very forums, but is now lost to us. "This is [FQA], not Daily Affirmations with Stewart Smalley." Things can get a bit heated anywhere here. However, outside of Flame and Burn, ONLY opinions and statements are to be attacked, NOT the people giving them. Those doing it, you know who you are, so stop it out here. If you want to have it out, Flame and Burn is only a few clicks away. Thank you.PRAISE THE DOCTOR!
Going back to the original debate, I'd like to point out that, while all politicians are subjected to over-the-top attacks and that none of them should be beyond criticism, it's extraordinarily difficult to believe that some (not all) of the attacks on Obama (the birther movement moving into the mainstream, people whining about his name being foreign-sounding, etc.) aren't racial in nature. Does that mean that every single person who criticizes Obama is racist? Of course not. What is does mean is that his race has almost certainly influenced the perception a significant number of people hold of him, which should be viewed as a very, very bad thing regardless of whether or not you actually like the guy.*Cough*foxnews*cough*
Yes, indeed. Ultie, if you'd like to continue our lovely internet slap fight, there's now a thread in F&B for just this purpose.MOD MODE: I'm going to quote a very wise person who once was a great presence in these very forums, but is now lost to us. "This is [FQA], not Daily Affirmations with Stewart Smalley." Things can get a bit heated anywhere here. However, outside of Flame and Burn, ONLY opinions and statements are to be attacked, NOT the people giving them. Those doing it, you know who you are, so stop it out here. If you want to have it out, Flame and Burn is only a few clicks away. Thank you.PRAISE THE DOCTOR!
*slaps you*Yes, indeed. Ultie, if you'd like to continue our lovely internet slap fight, there's now a thread in F&B for just this purpose.MOD MODE: I'm going to quote a very wise person who once was a great presence in these very forums, but is now lost to us. "This is [FQA], not Daily Affirmations with Stewart Smalley." Things can get a bit heated anywhere here. However, outside of Flame and Burn, ONLY opinions and statements are to be attacked, NOT the people giving them. Those doing it, you know who you are, so stop it out here. If you want to have it out, Flame and Burn is only a few clicks away. Thank you.PRAISE THE DOCTOR!
Going back to the original debate, I'd like to point out that, while all politicians are subjected to over-the-top attacks and that none of them should be beyond criticism, it's extraordinarily difficult to believe that some (not all) of the attacks on Obama (the birther movement moving into the mainstream, people whining about his name being foreign-sounding, etc.) aren't racial in nature. Does that mean that every single person who criticizes Obama is racist? Of course not. What is does mean is that his race has almost certainly influenced the perception a significant number of people hold of him, which should be viewed as a very, very bad thing regardless of whether or not you actually like the guy.
(http://i58.tinypic.com/2d9xn5y.gif)I don't see anything.
Happened to me. Lost my business, lost my pay. I cried my eyes out when I had to ask for assistance. My pride makes me embarrassed every time I go to a store. I'm blessed to have loved ones that help me while I am constantly looking for a job. I even took a job that pays me
Only $250 after taxes, but still can't afford food. I used to judge, but I'm one of those people with a nice phone and nice clothes. Never thought in my life I would be in this situation, especially as a mother. It's heartbreaking. You never know.
Anyone can lose everything with just one job loss.
From someone who has foodstamps let's clear something up real quick. I have a coach purse and wallet (got for Christmas but I know it was bought from the coach outlet which is much cheaper), iPhone 4S that I've had since I worked and since went to straight talk and sold the husbands iphone to make the monthly $45 payment, I have my nails and hair done ( received gift certificates for both including the tips from family for Christmas as well and won't be getting them redone as we can't afford it!) I drive a van with 360,000 miles on it. My kids have nice clothes because we get them from children's thrift stores. While I know that there are people that abuse the system, before you're so quick to judge you might want to get the whole back story. So please go ahead an judge me when I'm buying my food with my food card because of this and it will make YOU look stupid not me!
(http://cdnl.complex.com/m.php/CHANNEL_IMAGES/POP_CULTURE/2012/11/50-most-racist-political-cartoons/mountainmohammed_374879.jpg)
(https://24.media.tumblr.com/be6a2c599b4b3d4bfe68b84d3d242b1b/tumblr_n0erweoLpI1qdlhzzo1_500.jpg)You know, I have a friend originally from Iraq. His family fled Saddam's rule in the 90s. He saved a little boy from drowning. He volunteers at a soup kitchen. He gives a fifth of his salary to charity. And in the aftermath of 9/11, he was attacked by a group of brutes just because he's a Muslim. Thankfully, he managed to escape, but he called it one of the most harrowing experiences of his life. Go ahead. Tell him Muslims are evil and deserve to be mistreated.
<puts popcorn in the microwave>y?
(https://24.media.tumblr.com/be6a2c599b4b3d4bfe68b84d3d242b1b/tumblr_n0erweoLpI1qdlhzzo1_500.jpg)
<puts popcorn in the microwave>y?
<puts popcorn in the microwave>y?
(http://i418.photobucket.com/albums/pp268/narniafan26/WhiteTears.jpg)If you want we can.<puts popcorn in the microwave>y?
I dared to hope that UP would get all whiggy about "He should replace 'Islam' and 'Muslims' with 'White People'.
WHITEY MAYO WHITE WHITE MAYO MAYO MAYO WHITE MAYO WHITE WHITE MAYO WHITEY MAYO WHITE!
Does moochelle not realize that it is the young people's money that is needed to pay for her cojones lacking husband's piece of fecal matter people refer to as health insurance????
Insulting them is NOT the way to get them to pay. ~Cupcakes
The quote is very poorly written, but I'm pretty sure he was saying that Obama Care is the "piece of fecal matter".
(http://i.imgur.com/7aPq8Pv.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/7aPq8Pv.jpg)
Change it to "Teabagitis" and replace the Obama logo with "G.O.P" and it'll be about right.
Especially concerning the "shades of grey" & "logic" stuff. Lack of those things is a Tealiban trait, not an Obama-person.
From Unbridled Truth Cannot Be Silenced Facebook page.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/534099_296540477159927_602843594_n.jpg)
But they say they're not racist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8O4UWeAglU
Just delete the "s" after http in the web address.
From Unbridled Truth Cannot Be Silenced Facebook page.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/534099_296540477159927_602843594_n.jpg)
But they say they're not racist.
Along with the obvious "Blacks Are Apes" B.S. what's with folks and their bizarre hallucinatory view of Michelle Obama?
WE SEE: A elegant, beautiful, well-dressed, intelligent, graceful, sweet, stylish lady full of grace & poise.
THEY SEE: A horrifyingly butt-ugly reject from a blaxploitation film who's 5000 pounds & talks like Mushmouth from Fat Albert and rife with body odor & horrible fashion sense......or a large furry cryptid.
From Unbridled Truth Cannot Be Silenced Facebook page.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/534099_296540477159927_602843594_n.jpg)
But they say they're not racist.
Along with the obvious "Blacks Are Apes" B.S. what's with folks and their bizarre hallucinatory view of Michelle Obama?
WE SEE: A elegant, beautiful, well-dressed, intelligent, graceful, sweet, stylish lady full of grace & poise.
THEY SEE: A horrifyingly butt-ugly reject from a blaxploitation film who's 5000 pounds & talks like Mushmouth from Fat Albert and rife with body odor & horrible fashion sense......or a large furry cryptid.
It's very easy to convince yourself of something it is convenient to believe.
I would actually prefer a taller woman myself. Especially if she's tall enough that my face is level with her chest ;)
It works the other way, too. There are a lot of people who think short men are ugly.From Unbridled Truth Cannot Be Silenced Facebook page.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/534099_296540477159927_602843594_n.jpg)
But they say they're not racist.
Along with the obvious "Blacks Are Apes" B.S. what's with folks and their bizarre hallucinatory view of Michelle Obama?
WE SEE: A elegant, beautiful, well-dressed, intelligent, graceful, sweet, stylish lady full of grace & poise.
THEY SEE: A horrifyingly butt-ugly reject from a blaxploitation film who's 5000 pounds & talks like Mushmouth from Fat Albert and rife with body odor & horrible fashion sense......or a large furry cryptid.
It's very easy to convince yourself of something it is convenient to believe.
I'm also going to add the suggestion that maybe it has something to do with the fact that she's quite tall. I've met people who would dismiss a woman as being ugly for simply being unusually tall, regardless of the rest of her physical appearance.
And by "people" I of course mean "wankers".
(http://amptoons.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/oliphant_rice.gif)
Oliphant, just stop. Please. For your own sake.
That is Bush & Condi. I saw it on a blog entry that only updated this week, so I assume Pat's finally gone so senile he thinks Bush is still the president.(http://amptoons.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/oliphant_rice.gif)
Oliphant, just stop. Please. For your own sake.
Looks like Bush & Condi but since this is in the "Worst" section, it probably isn't.
If it's the former, it's as outdated as it is really weird.
That is Bush & Condi. I saw it on a blog entry that only updated this week, so I assume Pat's finally gone so senile he thinks Bush is still the president.(http://amptoons.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/oliphant_rice.gif)
Oliphant, just stop. Please. For your own sake.
Looks like Bush & Condi but since this is in the "Worst" section, it probably isn't.
If it's the former, it's as outdated as it is really weird.
Also, why isn't it "worst" if it is them? Are you saying it's okay to be racist if it's against a conservative?
Okay, I just wanted to make sure.
Good. Glad we could clear that up.Okay, I just wanted to make sure.
That's cool. 8)
(http://media.cagle.com/12/2012/09/05/118111_600.jpg)
(http://media.cagle.com/12/2012/09/05/118111_600.jpg)
RULE #526 OF WINGNUT RHETORIC: When you cannot come up with a good argument against an intelligent female young college-student opponent, turn her into a 50-year-old frump with a weird nose who talks like Patrick Henry.
(http://amptoons.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/oliphant_rice.gif)
Oliphant, just stop. Please. For your own sake.
Looks like Bush & Condi but since this is in the "Worst" section, it probably isn't.
If it's the former, it's as outdated as it is really weird.
RULE #526 OF WINGNUT RHETORIC: When you cannot come up with a good argument against an intelligent female young college-student opponent, turn her into a 50-year-old frump with a weird nose who talks like Patrick Henry.
As for Clint, I now have the feeling that was just trolling the GOP bunch. He may be kinda Conservative but more in the "traditional, non-insane, non-fundy normal person way". Plus he said this a while back.......
(http://i61.tinypic.com/23s97ko.jpg)
.......a guy who says this who goes to their convention and does a weird rambling chair thing has GOT to be trolling.
I would actually prefer a taller woman myself. Especially if she's tall enough that my face is level with her chest ;)Served a woman who was really tall at work the other week. Simultaneously awkward and awesome. Awesome because, well, boos. Awkward because i had to crane my neck to look at her face, which you kinda have to do when serving someone.
RULE #526 OF WINGNUT RHETORIC: When you cannot come up with a good argument against an intelligent female young college-student opponent, turn her into a 50-year-old frump with a weird nose who talks like Patrick Henry.
As for Clint, I now have the feeling that was just trolling the GOP bunch. He may be kinda Conservative but more in the "traditional, non-insane, non-fundy normal person way". Plus he said this a while back.......
(http://i61.tinypic.com/23s97ko.jpg)
.......a guy who says this who goes to their convention and does a weird rambling chair thing has GOT to be trolling.
I believe he said that he went on his weird bent specifically because they invited him and it pissed him off that they did, so he decided to fuck with 'em. Because Clint Eastwood is a fucking BOSS like that.
And the bogeyman wants to steal your children in the night.It's just getting better and better!
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1/1150923_709425659088991_1642302918_n.jpg)So sense I want background checks and better ways to prevent gun related suicide I want to take yer guns?
And the bogeyman wants to steal your children in the night.
(https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1/1150923_709425659088991_1642302918_n.jpg)
(http://stavvers.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/seahorse1.gif)
Fuck, it's from a feminist source.(http://stavvers.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/seahorse1.gif)
Aww. That seahorse couple is so cute. Is this really from an anti-feminist source?
I get that it's because the male seahorse is pregnant, but this photo hardly paints it in a bad light.
Along with religion, politics, and shipping.Fuck, it's from a feminist source.(http://stavvers.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/seahorse1.gif)
Aww. That seahorse couple is so cute. Is this really from an anti-feminist source?
I get that it's because the male seahorse is pregnant, but this photo hardly paints it in a bad light.
I suppose sense the internet starts frothing whenever feminism is brought up.
It's specifically from a satirical article by a feminist: http://stavvers.wordpress.com/2011/09/28/how-to-oppress-men-a-little-more-effectively-what-we-can-learn-from-fish/Poe's law in action, folks.
(http://i.imgur.com/VZpdttB.jpg)Do Jews prevent you from finding an original image?
Is it just me, or does the "Law Courts" one look like Snape?Don't be ridiculous, Snape never used pink lipstick.
Is it just me, or does the "Law Courts" one look like Snape?Don't be ridiculous, Snape never used pink lipstick.
Is it just me, or does the "Law Courts" one look like Snape?Don't be ridiculous, Snape never used pink lipstick.
...That we KNOW of.
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
Is it just me, or does the "Law Courts" one look like Snape?
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
(http://www.cookhacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CH2-bacon-package-Kosher-SM.jpg)
It could be turkey bacon.
Is deer not kosher? Because I've had venison bacon before.
Is deer not kosher? Because I've had venison bacon before.
They're cloven-hoofed ruminants, so yes. Assuming it's slaughtered and prepared properly.
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
(http://www.cookhacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CH2-bacon-package-Kosher-SM.jpg)
Now, that's just marketing bullshit. The OT specifically says pig is verboten. I don't think even a rabbi blessing the bacon would make it kosher.
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
Or shrimp.
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
Or shrimp.
Uhh reformed?!
Come to the Jew Side. We have food. Lots of food. Seriously, you're sure you're not hungry?But you don't have bacon. :'(
Or shrimp.
Uhh reformed?!
Full sentences and the Queen's English, Booley.
I knew what ya meant, I just figured it'd be fun to prod someone...you just happened to be the first thing that came to my attention when the feeling hit me, lol.
(http://i.imgur.com/gTsbcpV.jpg)Kind of ironic in regards to climate change.
(http://i.imgur.com/gTsbcpV.jpg)Kind of ironic in regards to climate change.
Ironbite-nah....let's just close the borders and shoot all the dirty illegals.But then who will be abused to work for sub par wages?!?!?!? /business owner
It came from the same place almost everything in this thread came from: some moron pulled it out of his ass and now we all have to deal with the resulting stupid.
It came from the same place almost everything in this thread came from: some moron pulled it out of his ass and now we all have to deal with the resulting stupid.
Something like that. The official statistic is something like 700,000 per year, but some people argue that this number is fake and so they tried to run an independent estimate which as far as I can tell relies on taking how many illegal immigrants are caught in the Mexican border and then multiplying it by the border patrol estimate of how many get away. The 3 million number in particular I think comes from this TIME article (http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,995145,00.html?iid=chix-sphere) which is paywalled so I can't check how they got their numbers.
It all definitely sounds like an elaborate way of pulling numbers out of one's ass, or possibly an error in interpreting the numbers, but I can't check the numbers so I don't know.
Yeah, TIME and Newsweek both - rotting zombie shells of their former reliable selves.
Also, as to the illegal immigration number crunching; whichever way you want to compile that data, keep in mind that a large percentage are going to be the same people, year after year, trying to come through to get seasonal labor jobs in agriculture and to try their luck getting hired during the annual labor demand spike in construction trades every spring.
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f8T-CI4_8vY/UBFvTyteEKI/AAAAAAAACZI/UN9K69yCsuc/s1600/goy-toys.jpg)
Because EVIL JEW CONSPIRACY!2!!!1!!
Minor nitpick, but wouldn't white sterilization impede the eeeeevill goal of a population of evenly-mixed "human mutts"?
I like how the artist put the star on the tie, just in case it wasn't clear what kind of message he was trying to put across.That he was a Mormon?
I like how the artist put the star on the tie, just in case it wasn't clear what kind of message he was trying to put across.
(http://www.end-hate.org/what_is_nonsense.gif)I once had to pay for both my Arby's roast beef burger and my dates.
I wonder how many MRAs have actually gone on a date with actual women, instead of just mindlessly parroting sexist memes made by the MRM as if they're actual 100% fact.
I once had to pay for both my Arby's roast beef burger and my dates.;D
Misandry.
QuoteI once had to pay for both my Arby's roast beef burger and my dates.;D
Misandry.
And they harp on the old adage that if on your big first dinner date, the lady orders a lobster entrée, she's obligated to fuck you. Dream on.
Having seen many big first dates at the fine dining restaurants I've worked at over the years (I also co-owned a small bistro), I can tell you for a fact that splitting the bill is much more common than the folklore surrounding the event would imply. Try, 75% of the time, the couple each pay at least a portion, such as the wine and drinks, if they don't just split it down the middle. And I've witnessed women pick up the entire tab on Valentine's Day, too. When I worked at a steakhouse (Morton's), women very often picked up the bill because they brought their male date there as a surprise treat.
(http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj550/truthishatespeech/being-white-is-a-hate-crime.png)
(http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj550/truthishatespeech/being-white-is-a-hate-crime.png)White people are simply by nature hateful,and thus should all be jailed. a good cartoon.
(http://veneremurcernui.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/577512_348287645273334_458077688_n.jpg)Context? Was this some Gosnell-esque illegal clinic? Or was he just not cut out for his job? I don't know that much about the actual medical procedures behind abortion, so I don't know.
I imagine the artist was trying to make the baby look like a gorilla as much as possible.
They're dehumanizing the "enemy". It's an age-old tactic.I imagine the artist was trying to make the baby look like a gorilla as much as possible.
It's a classic bigot tactic, like Jews & huge nasal appendages.
Also, I find it laughable that an actual OB/GYN who performs abortions would say that he turns to cocaine use to deal with it all. How come? Does he toot up prior to procedures? Cause ya don't do blow to ease anxiety. It's no doubt just another Lie for Jezuz and the Babbys.
Based on what you just said, I'm assuming none of it.Also, I find it laughable that an actual OB/GYN who performs abortions would say that he turns to cocaine use to deal with it all. How come? Does he toot up prior to procedures? Cause ya don't do blow to ease anxiety. It's no doubt just another Lie for Jezuz and the Babbys.
As far as I can tell Eric Harrah is not a doctor and did not perform abortions. If you google his name you'll find a bunch of pro-life websites where they call him a former abortion clinic owner or manager. Also the moving story about how he was convinced to become pro-life by a protester, and also apparently converted to Christianity and abandoned his homosexuality. Not sure how much of it is true, too lazy to find out.
Also, I find it laughable that an actual OB/GYN who performs abortions would say that he turns to cocaine use to deal with it all. How come? Does he toot up prior to procedures? Cause ya don't do blow to ease anxiety. It's no doubt just another Lie for Jezuz and the Babbys.
He turned to marijuana injection, he later became gay, turned to communism, then turned into a goat from all the marijuanas in his system.Also, I find it laughable that an actual OB/GYN who performs abortions would say that he turns to cocaine use to deal with it all. How come? Does he toot up prior to procedures? Cause ya don't do blow to ease anxiety. It's no doubt just another Lie for Jezuz and the Babbys.
It would be somewhat more believable if he had said he became an alcoholic, but that can happen to anybody and is just too mundane too make a good poster I guess.
(http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj550/truthishatespeech/being-white-is-a-hate-crime.png)
(http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/wong/bafflingcomic/faithmouse4b.jpg)That belongs in best cartoons, it has the best argument about the need to support the lower class I have ever seen.
I feel like I'm reading the Necronomicon. I don't understand it, and quite frankly, I'm not sure I want to.
Maybe I'll stop calling you racist if you can actually draw black people like....people.
(http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/wong/bafflingcomic/faithmouse4b.jpg)
I feel like I'm reading the Necronomicon. I don't understand it, and quite frankly, I'm not sure I want to.
(http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/wong/bafflingcomic/faithmouse4b.jpg)
I feel like I'm reading the Necronomicon. I don't understand it, and quite frankly, I'm not sure I want to.
(http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/wong/bafflingcomic/faithmouse4b.jpg)oh jesus christ what the fuck is this
I feel like I'm reading the Necronomicon. I don't understand it, and quite frankly, I'm not sure I want to.
Sadly, the "Pancake Paintings" are the only stuff that guy makes that's relatively sane & amusing (with exception of the 9/11 one. That's plain wrong).
That's way funnier than the pancake thing.I don't know, I'm irrationally fond of Pancake Palin. The second one captures the special, Palin-esque derrrrrrrpp very well.
That's way funnier than the pancake thing.
Nooooo! We have free healthcare!
What do you mean by your state opted out of Obamacare?
I'm guessing the entire reason for this is to trick people in to thinking the insurance is much more expensive than it actually should be.
Florida also "opted out" of Obama Care...and the insurance I got through the federal healthcare.gov site is really good and only costs me 132 a month; excellent for a 53 year old smoker. 335 dollars of the monthly premium is subsidized by federal taxes and the assessment of what I will be paying in income taxes in 2015. Some States "opted out" of setting up their own state level online insurance exchanges, and most also refused to adopt the mildly expanded Medicaid income requirements.
(http://adam4d.com/comics/2014-04-23-irony1.png)Praise Allah indeed.
Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Fun fact: consevatives believe Allah is a 500 foot tall beast composed mainly of tentacles.
Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Fun fact: consevatives believe Allah is a 500 foot tall beast composed mainly of tentacles.
In a stunning coincidence, he has an affinity both for Japanese schoolgirls and sending horrific nightmares regarding mankind's insignificance into the minds of New England men with a taste for purple prose.
According to Islamophobes, yes.Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Fun fact: consevatives believe Allah is a 500 foot tall beast composed mainly of tentacles.
In a stunning coincidence, he has an affinity both for Japanese schoolgirls and sending horrific nightmares regarding mankind's insignificance into the minds of New England men with a taste for purple prose.
So Allah's Cthulhu, then.
According to Islamophobes, yes.Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Fun fact: consevatives believe Allah is a 500 foot tall beast composed mainly of tentacles.
In a stunning coincidence, he has an affinity both for Japanese schoolgirls and sending horrific nightmares regarding mankind's insignificance into the minds of New England men with a taste for purple prose.
So Allah's Cthulhu, then.
It would be funny if their insanity didn't hurt people.According to Islamophobes, yes.Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Fun fact: consevatives believe Allah is a 500 foot tall beast composed mainly of tentacles.
In a stunning coincidence, he has an affinity both for Japanese schoolgirls and sending horrific nightmares regarding mankind's insignificance into the minds of New England men with a taste for purple prose.
So Allah's Cthulhu, then.
That would make Mohammed "The Mad Arab" & The Quran The Necronimicon.
Frums are a weird bunch of people.
It would be funny if their insanity didn't hurt people.According to Islamophobes, yes.Pretty sure Allah scare them more.Heathen! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true God!-stupid-Praise Allah indeed.
Fun fact: consevatives believe Allah is a 500 foot tall beast composed mainly of tentacles.
In a stunning coincidence, he has an affinity both for Japanese schoolgirls and sending horrific nightmares regarding mankind's insignificance into the minds of New England men with a taste for purple prose.
So Allah's Cthulhu, then.
That would make Mohammed "The Mad Arab" & The Quran The Necronimicon.
Frums are a weird bunch of people.
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/29w70pj.jpg)
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/29w70pj.jpg)
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/65d1yf.jpg)
One thing about that "Zogzilla" and the racist scaretalk about white race disappearing is that they really do make "white race" sound weak. And all those conspiracies about jews secretly controlling the world, wouldn't that make them the top of the food chain and the master race?
I'm pretty sure most white supremacists are social Darwinists.
It looks like Henry Kissinger wearing the noose.
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/n36uq1.jpg)
Dafuq?
Is it bad that the only thing I could think about is "why the hell to wing nuts always draw Obama with Dumbo ears?"
(http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/969996_10152209967790914_647562757059513634_n-500x346.jpg)
(http://conservativeamerican.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/012214jobless21-600x398.jpg)
44.5% unemployment rate up from...40.5% in 2007!
As for the President playing golf thing...where were these knuckle-dragging cretins when Bush did the exact same thing?
(http://i.imgur.com/0HEaGif.png?1?4284)(http://conservativeamerican.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/012214jobless21-600x398.jpg)
44.5% unemployment rate up from...40.5% in 2007!
As for the President playing golf thing...where were these knuckle-dragging cretins when Bush did the exact same thing?
That chart doesn't show the unemployment rate. The highest unemployment rate under Obama was 9.9 percent, which happened in November of 2009. Whoever made that chart is either stupid, lying, or both.
Here is the real unemployment timeline from the exact same source: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE (http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE)
Oh, and the unemployment rate during the Depression was well over 20 percent. Saying that Obama oversaw Depression-era levels of unemployment is grossly inaccurate. Saying Reagan-era levels would be more accurate (unemployment peaked at 10.8 percent in December 1982, the highest that it has been since the Depression).
The graph that conservativeamericans.org only excludes active duty military personnel and people who are imprisoned. The unemployment rate should also exclude everybody who isn't actively seeking a job, such as retired people, full time students, disabled people, homemakers, and so on. It's entirely possible that it's real (though I couldn't find it either), but even if it is, it is extremely misleading, as it includes people who are not even part of the labor force.
Am I the only person unable to tell any but the most stereotypical-looking Jew apart from someone of European descent?No.
I do believe that's a satire of anti-semitic cartoons... but it's hard to tell.It really is.
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/2jcewdg.jpg)I don't think he understands what cosplay is.
I don't think he understands what cosplay is.Actually he does. The point is that the "artist" is a neo-Nazi and he is saying that when the Nazis get in power and start killing the "untermensch" they will shoot the nazi-cosplayers because those people usually make statements that they do not REALLY like the nazis or support their cause. So he is not angry over the cosplayers wearing Nazi uniforms, he is angry because they aren't nazis.
I don't think he understands what cosplay is.Actually he does. The point is that the "artist" is a neo-Nazi and he is saying that when the Nazis get in power and start killing the "untermensch" they will shoot the nazi-cosplayers because those people usually make statements that they do not REALLY like the nazis or support their cause. So he is not angry over the cosplayers wearing Nazi uniforms, he is angry because they aren't nazis.
(Personally I don't mind nazi-cosplay. People do it in historical re-enactment and people cosplay all kinds of villains from shows and I don't think that the kid who is dressed up like Vader wants to start a fascist regime either.)
I don't think he understands what cosplay is.Actually he does. The point is that the "artist" is a neo-Nazi and he is saying that when the Nazis get in power and start killing the "untermensch" they will shoot the nazi-cosplayers because those people usually make statements that they do not REALLY like the nazis or support their cause. So he is not angry over the cosplayers wearing Nazi uniforms, he is angry because they aren't nazis.
(Personally I don't mind nazi-cosplay. People do it in historical re-enactment and people cosplay all kinds of villains from shows and I don't think that the kid who is dressed up like Vader wants to start a fascist regime either.)
There was one political candidate who was an historical reenactor a while back. A lot of people attacked him because he'd dressed up as a Nazi a few times as part of World War II reenactments, despite having played all kinds of other roles on both sides of several wars.
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image60.jpg)Hitler created the hamburger as well.
I'm pretty sure this is grounds for Volkswagen to sue. And if not, it should be.
I'm pretty sure this is grounds for Volkswagen to sue. And if not, it should be.(click to show/hide)
I'm pretty sure this is grounds for Volkswagen to sue. And if not, it should be.(click to show/hide)
I'm pretty sure it isn't. "Created by Hitler" is an exaggeration, but he was involved in the process.
Yeah, that's what I meant.I'm pretty sure this is grounds for Volkswagen to sue. And if not, it should be.(click to show/hide)
I'm pretty sure it isn't. "Created by Hitler" is an exaggeration, but he was involved in the process.
I don't think UP meant VW could sue over the veracity of the Hitler connection, nor do I think he was questioning the veracity of that connection (he never said anything to indicate that so I'm a bit confused as to why you think that) I think he meant more that they could - or at least should be able to - sue over the whole "unauthorised use of your company's name and logo for racist propeganda" issue. I'm pretty sure a good lawyer could find something to sue for in that picture.
Whether or not they'd win is another matter of course.
Tebow gets ridiculed because he is a grandstanding, showboating, whining little bitch of a pseudo Christian. I know a couple of local ministers who make fun of him at neighborhood social gatherings.The bible itself says praying in public means your a massive fuckin douche.
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/1a7b97943fe2bcd91a20e5bbf14f13b4/tumblr_n5hlqdzTs11rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/7dc803628b1e4e7a2ef8d53a99848306/tumblr_n5tsr32WAS1qikfcno1_500.jpg)
Speaking of which, what has happened with Tebow? I've forgotten about him.(https://31.media.tumblr.com/1a7b97943fe2bcd91a20e5bbf14f13b4/tumblr_n5hlqdzTs11rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
"You're being a bit of an ass, bro" is hate speech now?
I wonder that, too, all I hear of him is fundies bringing him up as an example of "people discriminating against Christians."Which is stupid, because most people don't care about his religion, they just don't like him making a fucking production out of it.
Speaking of which, what has happened with Tebow? I've forgotten about him.(https://31.media.tumblr.com/1a7b97943fe2bcd91a20e5bbf14f13b4/tumblr_n5hlqdzTs11rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
"You're being a bit of an ass, bro" is hate speech now?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHe4OQ4bY4o
*picture*
Beating a dead horse, part 10541.
Benghazi, because of the talk of yet another investigation committee on it.*picture*
Beating a dead horse, part 10541.
What's this one referring to?
I jack off to Bangazis.Benghazi, because of the talk of yet another investigation committee on it.*picture*
Beating a dead horse, part 10541.
What's this one referring to?
And they're trying to ride Beghazi for some election victories.
Ironbite-despite ignoring the fact that even their own voters are sick of hearing about it.
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/2u74v40.jpg)
You know what's really sad? A. Wyatt Mann is a legitimately good artist. It's a shame to see somebody with actual talent be so hateful.
I'll agree that wiggers are a blight, but only inasmuch as they're extremely obnoxious dudebros who blast "music" (since its nothing but fucking bass, you can't really tell) at a window-destroyingly high volume at all hours of the day and night. Not that I want 'em dead, just...beaten, perhaps, but nothing permanent.
I'll agree that wiggers are a blight, but only inasmuch as they're extremely obnoxious dudebros who blast "music" (since its nothing but fucking bass, you can't really tell) at a window-destroyingly high volume at all hours of the day and night. Not that I want 'em dead, just...beaten, perhaps, but nothing permanent.
My roommate and I have seriously considered crafting an EMP gun to knock out the cars who have obnoxiously loud bass, and every fucking Harley rider around here who can't ride at a decent decibel level. Here's a hint: If I can hear you coming three miles and four minutes before I see you out on 9W, you need to be cited by the cops for excessive noise.
My sister has sub-woofers installed in her car and is one of those people that likes to blast it loud. I personally don't get how people can like having the bass up that loud. To me, it feels like my insides are going to explode and it's uncomfortable. I can listen to loud music but I just can't have the bass up like that and I will never understand the appeal in music that makes you feel like you're getting assaulted by lower frequency sound waves.
My sister has sub-woofers installed in her car and is one of those people that likes to blast it loud. I personally don't get how people can like having the bass up that loud. To me, it feels like my insides are going to explode and it's uncomfortable. I can listen to loud music but I just can't have the bass up like that and I will never understand the appeal in music that makes you feel like you're getting assaulted by lower frequency sound waves.
At least for me personally, it actually feels good in a way. Something about the vibrations is actually pleasant.
(http://cormind.typepad.com/.a/6a010536d9e591970c0133f4f8957a970b-800wi)
....that's a poodle.
Exercise for home: name one form of government that doesn't result in the crocodiles eating the poodle. Assume a universe limited exactly to the crocodiles and the poodle (after all, the author does the same) and that crocodiles would defeat the poodle if it came to violence.
The only one I can come up with is a theocracy, and even then only if your religion happens to prefer Anubis over Sobek.
Welp. Its 4:10 in the morning, and I finally finished binge-reading this entire thread. Time for sleep plauged with nightmares of fuckwits, bigots, and conspiracy theorists.
(http://media.tumblr.com/c3efdbea1d1ef790d524b0c69c4c3d3d/tumblr_n6goaho11W1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
(http://media.tumblr.com/c3efdbea1d1ef790d524b0c69c4c3d3d/tumblr_n6goaho11W1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
Indeed, windmills may have killed as many as three whole birds in the 40 years we've used them. Coal power stations don't kill birds, of course.
Birdemic 4: The BirdeningBirdemic 7: Surfin' bird. (Alternative title: Everybody's heard about the bird.)
Birdemic 5: Never Bird Down
Birdemic 6: Bird Hawk Down
so what would Birdemic X be? stick figures on notebook paper?
(http://37.media.tumblr.com/07d1ddf4db1b61fc57c2ae8b8a336bd4/tumblr_n5xtx0LaJt1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
I don't think "hater" was ever used to dehumanize an entire group.Don't be so quick to dismiss him, thanks to the PC libetard she can't even go on long, drunken, rants about how blacks are parasites and thugs without being called an hateful asshole!
(http://i.imgur.com/ZWg2YjP.jpg)
Hilariously enough, when I see "PC" I can't help but think "Progressive Conservative", which of course is/was a right-wing party...
Hilariously enough, when I see "PC" I can't help but think "Progressive Conservative", which of course is/was a right-wing party...
Seriously? Wouldn't "progressive conservative" be an oxymoron?
Yep! The federal party dropped the "progressive" a bunch of years back, but Ontario at least (and I think at least a few other provinces) still have a provincial Progressive Conservative party. Even in grade five I thought that was an oxymoron, and that was back when I thought conservatives would be the types to care about CONSERVing the environment, so shows what I know, eh?Hilariously enough, when I see "PC" I can't help but think "Progressive Conservative", which of course is/was a right-wing party...
Seriously? Wouldn't "progressive conservative" be an oxymoron?
Hilariously enough, when I see "PC" I can't help but think "Progressive Conservative", which of course is/was a right-wing party...
Seriously? Wouldn't "progressive conservative" be an oxymoron?
(originally the Conservative Reform Alliance Party)
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/WHITES/white_image09.jpg)Even if there were no "white colored" people on Earth anymore, many people who are nowadays considered "darker skinned" have Caucasian ancestors, meaning white people cannot go extinct unless all the other so called races also go extinct too.
It appears to an R. Crumb satire. I'm not sure his true beliefs but I always figured his "bigoted" stuff was satire. I think he also did the same dumb cartoon with Jews, too.You mean this?
Paragon. Do you post waaaaaay-oversized cartoons on purpose to annoy people or are you just incapable of shrinking pics? I refuse to shrink your pic, y'big baby. Do it yourself! >:(Sorry, I'll try to remember in the future.
Paragon. Do you post waaaaaay-oversized cartoons on purpose to annoy people or are you just incapable of shrinking pics? I refuse to shrink your pic, y'big baby. Do it yourself! >:(Sorry, I'll try to remember in the future.
Done.
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/6y0945.jpg)
(http://oi61.tinypic.com/29oihp4.jpg)
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/xqau4n.jpg)
Done.Lol, goyim tears.
-snip-
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image66.jpg)
You know, there's recently been news of another drug-addled crook of a mayor.
(http://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/news/city_hall/2013/11/29/toronto_mayor_rob_ford_could_be_denied_entry_to_us/rob_ford_summer.jpg.size.xxlarge.promo.jpg)
The difference is, he's white.
Is it just me, or does that dude look like he's about half a minute away from spontaneously combusting?
(https://38.media.tumblr.com/ceda1b422d0ff7cfb26c06d977a61f8a/tumblr_n82a3rTu591rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
And just nine bucks?(https://38.media.tumblr.com/ceda1b422d0ff7cfb26c06d977a61f8a/tumblr_n82a3rTu591rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
I'd love to know what planet these guys are from. The only contraception you can buy over-the-counter are condoms.
Cloudy, you stupid slut, its only religious oppression when those filthy, terrorist Muslims are allowed to live on our soil and worship their daemon-god.
Cloudy, you stupid slut, its only religious oppression when those filthy, terrorist Muslims are allowed to live on our soil and worship their daemon-god.
Thought the arguement was Allah was a moon god?
(https://38.media.tumblr.com/ceda1b422d0ff7cfb26c06d977a61f8a/tumblr_n82a3rTu591rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
The same way its worked for the past 2,000 years: utter, complete shite.Yeah. More people need to understand that abstinence is not for everyone, so we shouldn't expect everyone to follow it.
(http://o.onionstatic.com/images/26/26644/original/700.jpg?5335)I'm pretty sure this is from The Onion.
Fuck this guy.
(http://o.onionstatic.com/images/26/26644/original/700.jpg?5335)I'm pretty sure this is from The Onion.
Fuck this guy.
Fuck this guy.
(http://o.onionstatic.com/images/26/26644/original/700.jpg?5335)
Fuck this guy.
A demon Moon God!
Although they probably don't want to talk about the original role of Yahweh and Jehovah.
(http://o.onionstatic.com/images/26/26644/original/700.jpg?5335)
Fuck this guy.
... but the witch is white as well. Why would she want a white genocide?I'm guessing she's supposed to represent either the Jews or "self-loathing whites".
Quotehttp://31.media.tumblr.com/30a5273ad4b29bcbe0ecf8c074338299/tumblr_n5yc2iSqmR1rr5t33o1_500.jpg(http://37.media.tumblr.com/e584b8a28f7ffaf1d4d52bfddfe6c739/tumblr_n85e56h6kG1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/30a5273ad4b29bcbe0ecf8c074338299/tumblr_n5yc2iSqmR1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Wait, why is this in worst? It seems to say that those two shouldn't have these images popping into their heads because it can only sour any attempt at communication. That's not a horrible message, as I understand it.
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/30a5273ad4b29bcbe0ecf8c074338299/tumblr_n5yc2iSqmR1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Wait, why is this in worst? It seems to say that those two shouldn't have these images popping into their heads because it can only sour any attempt at communication. That's not a horrible message, as I understand it.
Thirded.(http://31.media.tumblr.com/30a5273ad4b29bcbe0ecf8c074338299/tumblr_n5yc2iSqmR1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Wait, why is this in worst? It seems to say that those two shouldn't have these images popping into their heads because it can only sour any attempt at communication. That's not a horrible message, as I understand it.
Yeah, seems good to me.
Okay, it's good i suppose.Kind of like how James Byrd's killers got off scot-free... oh wait.
I guess i didn't like it as it forgets that while both people have unfair perceptions of each other, only one has the ability to act on said perceptions in a violent way and not be punished.
(http://sphotos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/165807_181580288641708_543986704_n.jpg)
(click to show/hide)
Okay, children, today's phrase is "false equivalence". Can you say "false equivalence"?
Okay, it's good i suppose.Kind of like how James Byrd's killers got off scot-free... oh wait.
I guess i didn't like it as it forgets that while both people have unfair perceptions of each other, only one has the ability to act on said perceptions in a violent way and not be punished.
Okay, it's good i suppose.Kind of like how James Byrd's killers got off scot-free... oh wait.
I guess i didn't like it as it forgets that while both people have unfair perceptions of each other, only one has the ability to act on said perceptions in a violent way and not be punished.
The comic is about the Seattle Police Department, which has a bit of a racism problem, not white vs black.
(http://i0.wp.com/whitegenocideproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/anti2.jpg)
How many people actually want a white minority? Very few, I'd imagine.
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/0faf613effda9c1f806bbb04a8405c4e/tumblr_n83ikiekFY1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
Is he trying to be stupid now?
(http://i0.wp.com/whitegenocideproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/anti2.jpg)
How many people actually want a white minority? Very few, I'd imagine.
I am going to bet that that comic has been copied from something else. I swear I've seen that "joke" done for something else, I think it was used at least in one "I'm not racist but-" "SSSHHH! Don't finish that sentence" comic. Also, it might be that it was drawn directly onto another comic. Not certain about that but at least the poses look similar to the one I had seen earlier.
(http://whitegenocideproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/tw.bmp)
(http://media.cagle.com/12/2014/07/15/150975_600.jpg)
I think its talking about \"anchor babies,\" kids illegal immigrants supposedly have on US soil by a US citizen to forestall deportation.
You gonna finish that sentence?I think its talking about \"anchor babies,\" kids illegal immigrants supposedly have on US soil by a US citizen to forestall deportation.
Bullshit.
Utter bullshit, as the constitution makes it clear if you\
Probably had some server trouble while posting. It can occasionally do things like that (truncating the text and adding a slash), if you get the "too many connections" page when submitting a post and then reload.
(http://media.cagle.com/12/2014/07/15/150975_600.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/cWgwzIy.png)
Sorry, had a sudden hate attack.
What I meant to say was that if you're born in the us, you're a citizen.
(http://nzhealthtrust.co.nz/pictures/cartoon_counter_think.png)
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/WHITES/white_image19.jpg)
"Fight fair". That's rich coming from a White Nationalist.
I concur. I've never believed in fighting fair when lives are on the line. If some fuck tried to mug me, I wouldn't hesitate to fight dirty.(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/WHITES/white_image19.jpg)
"Fight fair". That's rich coming from a White Nationalist.
I'm not even sure what point they're trying to make here. That white people fight fair and black people can't compete on an even footing so have to "cheat"? Wut?
If that is the point then fuck that noise; if some racist prick grabs you by the throat I say go right ahead and shoot him in the dick.
I concur. I've never believed in fighting fair when lives are on the line. If some fuck tried to mug me, I wouldn't hesitate to fight dirty.(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/WHITES/white_image19.jpg)
"Fight fair". That's rich coming from a White Nationalist.
I'm not even sure what point they're trying to make here. That white people fight fair and black people can't compete on an even footing so have to "cheat"? Wut?
If that is the point then fuck that noise; if some racist prick grabs you by the throat I say go right ahead and shoot him in the dick.
I concur. I've never believed in fighting fair when lives are on the line. If some fuck tried to mug me, I wouldn't hesitate to fight dirty.(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/WHITES/white_image19.jpg)
"Fight fair". That's rich coming from a White Nationalist.
I'm not even sure what point they're trying to make here. That white people fight fair and black people can't compete on an even footing so have to "cheat"? Wut?
If that is the point then fuck that noise; if some racist prick grabs you by the throat I say go right ahead and shoot him in the dick.
Yep, when your life is almost certainly at stake, which it most likely would be if you're black and a skinhead with swastika tattoos has you by the throat, pretty much anything is justified. And if the other guy doesn't like it well then hey perhaps he should avoid commiting atempted murder and just leave people the fuck alone.
(http://media.cagle.com/95/2014/07/25/151410_600.jpg)How could a Pitbull bite off someone's arm?
With their eeeeeevul undying loyalty to their families and super-duper scientific "locking jaws"./s(http://media.cagle.com/95/2014/07/25/151410_600.jpg)How could a Pitbull bite off someone's arm?
How could a Pitbull bite off someone's arm?
How could a Pitbull bite off someone's arm?
It's not inconceivable. (http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Pit-bull-chews-off-owner-s-arm-hand-4976857.php)
(not defending the cartoon or making any sort of point re: banning pitbulls)
Regarding UP's last cartoon, is this guy trying to denounce slavery? Or support it? Can racists at least be coherent?Die Zionist scum.
Regarding UP's last cartoon, is this guy trying to denounce slavery? Or support it? Can racists at least be coherent?
Regarding UP's last cartoon, is this guy trying to denounce slavery? Or support it? Can racists at least be coherent?
I suspect the author is not so much trying to make a point but rather trying to be offensive.
Regarding UP's last cartoon, is this guy trying to denounce slavery? Or support it? Can racists at least be coherent?
I suspect the author is not so much trying to make a point but rather trying to be offensive.
Well, I think the idea is that the Jews brought slaves from Africa to America in order to destroy the white race there and make a pretty penny in the process. Funny thing is, Louis Farrakhan also blamed Jews for the slave trade.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/424/509/c82.jpg)
Is this all the same artists, or do cartoonists only have one caricature to go around?I think it's stolen from an anti-Semitic cartoon. Most of the assholes who do these cartoons are lazy and/or incompetent.
(http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/424/509/c82.jpg)
Is this all the same artists, or do cartoonists only have one caricature to go around?I think it's stolen from an anti-Semitic cartoon. Most of the assholes who do these cartoons are lazy and/or incompetent.
EDIT: I think I found its origin:
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image15.jpg)
Even though he's being plagiarized from, I can't say I feel sorry for A. Wyatt Mann.
It's true that the stereotype of the appearance goes back a long way. However, this particular image was stolen from the cartoon. You get what I'm saying, right?Is this all the same artists, or do cartoonists only have one caricature to go around?I think it's stolen from an anti-Semitic cartoon. Most of the assholes who do these cartoons are lazy and/or incompetent.
EDIT: I think I found its origin:
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image15.jpg)
Even though he's being plagiarized from, I can't say I feel sorry for A. Wyatt Mann.
Is that the source of the infamous caricature? I thought it was older, like from WWII Nazi Germany.
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image15.jpg)
Something tells me that's not what Mr. Mann means.(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image15.jpg)
Quickly overwhelmed with dead organisms since rats and cockroaches serve an essential biological function in helping the decomposition process?
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/de4038d69ee0dc9d8713145e5ba9d00f/tumblr_n8j2dnSK5U1rdwac3o1_500.jpg)
(http://37.media.tumblr.com/f85c5d710b7609ddc2b170f1aa509c3b/tumblr_n8j2dnSK5U1rdwac3o2_500.jpg)
(http://37.media.tumblr.com/f52532c07b2107cb534c37375dd63f83/tumblr_n8j2dnSK5U1rdwac3o3_500.jpg)
(http://37.media.tumblr.com/f52532c07b2107cb534c37375dd63f83/tumblr_n8j2dnSK5U1rdwac3o3_500.jpg)
(http://37.media.tumblr.com/bb738a4ada2aa1dee167cd6e5d10ba10/tumblr_n8j2dnSK5U1rdwac3o5_500.jpg)
"LOL, ALL MEN ARE RAPIST!"
-Totally real person I totally met IRL
Why is so hard to understand simple concepts like #YesAllWomen talking about things that virtually every woman has to deal with just because she's a woman and #NotAllMen being a reactionary bit of bullshit that derails the conversation and tries to make it about men, which is PART OF THE FUCKING PROBLEM.
Why is so hard to understand simple concepts like #YesAllWomen talking about things that virtually every woman has to deal with just because she's a woman and #NotAllMen being a reactionary bit of bullshit that derails the conversation and tries to make it about men, which is PART OF THE FUCKING PROBLEM.
NotAllMen, as an argument, has a simple explanation, though. Namely, that the person replying feels personally offended for one reason or another, and wants to clarify that not all men do action X, or more specifically, that they don't do action X. It's an argument of self-defence, basically. Is it a poor argument to bring up? Absolutely, since no one is accusing them of doing action X, except as a generalized class of people, i.e. men, that is understood by the person making the argument to not include every member of that class. Unfortunately, the understanding is not shared by the "defender". ...Unless someone actually is accusing that person of doing action X, whatever it might be. Then explaining that they don't do action X is relevant.
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/30ac3t4.jpg)
"Genocide".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/30ac3t4.jpg)
"Genocide".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
Because all Asian and African cultures are exactly the same.
I would love to explain to these idiots why immigration is important buut I imagine it would fly right over their stupid little heads.Most likely.
You mean they DON'T all settle their disagreements with epic kung-fu fights and run around naked with bones through their noses? [/sarcasm]
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image71.jpg)
Looks more like a White Nationalist's brain to me.
Sarah Palin's entire career nowadays is essentially a snake-oil salesperson defrauding Southerners of their hard-won. She literally makes a living preying on her ideological allies.
Sarah Palin's entire career nowadays is essentially a snake-oil salesperson defrauding Southerners of their hard-won. She literally makes a living preying on her ideological allies.
Pretty sure you just described the Republican party in general. Probably the Democrats too.
(http://i.imgur.com/wd6T9J0.jpg)Bump
I once found a neo-nazi who said children should be allowed to consent to sex at 12.There are a surprising number of pedophile White Nationalists, such as David Lane and Kevin Strom.
Doesn't it often overlap with 'we need to outbreed those a-rabs'?I once found a neo-nazi who said children should be allowed to consent to sex at 12.There are a surprising number of pedophile White Nationalists, such as David Lane and Kevin Strom.
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/94654236335)
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/95290329966)
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/94943807595)
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/94831865605)
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/94827910169)
What's JJ?I think they also can't understand that this is a race thing, hi matter how much they want to say it isn't.
Edit: Also, why is it so hard for conservatives to grasp that shooting someone dead is generally a dick move?
(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/5/57/If_Harry_Reid_lived_in_1812.jpg)
Yes, because illegal immigrants are exactly the same thing as an invading foreign army.
Most Americans at least know some of the conflict's highlights. We may not use it as a point of national pride like you Canucks do, but we remember it.(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/5/57/If_Harry_Reid_lived_in_1812.jpg)
Yes, because illegal immigrants are exactly the same thing as an invading foreign army.
I'm just impressed that someone in America actually knows this bit of history.
To be fair Napoleon was trying to invade us at the time with a massive army, so we may have been kinda distracted.Most Americans at least know some of the conflict's highlights. We may not use it as a point of national pride like you Canucks do, but we remember it.(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/5/57/If_Harry_Reid_lived_in_1812.jpg)
Yes, because illegal immigrants are exactly the same thing as an invading foreign army.
I'm just impressed that someone in America actually knows this bit of history.
The British, on the other hand, see it as sideshow of the Napoleonic Wars.
In many ways it is reasonable to view it as a sideshow since it amounts to little more than a French ally attacking a British colony during a much larger conflict. In WW1 or 2 it would have just been considered another theatre of operations.To be fair Napoleon was trying to invade us at the time with a massive army, so we may have been kinda distracted.Most Americans at least know some of the conflict's highlights. We may not use it as a point of national pride like you Canucks do, but we remember it.(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/5/57/If_Harry_Reid_lived_in_1812.jpg)
Yes, because illegal immigrants are exactly the same thing as an invading foreign army.
I'm just impressed that someone in America actually knows this bit of history.
The British, on the other hand, see it as sideshow of the Napoleonic Wars.
I never said I blamed the British, and I think it makes sense.I wasn't trying to suggest you were blaming the British; I was merely pointing out the probable reason for the difference in views. A lot of culturally significant moments are only significant to one culture and to the rest of the world they are barely significant blips on the radar. Vimy Ridge would be another good example. Outside Canada it is just part of the Battle of Arras but to us it ranks up there with D-Day.
I've seen the Vimy Ridge memorial, it's massive and very impressive.I never said I blamed the British, and I think it makes sense.I wasn't trying to suggest you were blaming the British; I was merely pointing out the probable reason for the difference in views. A lot of culturally significant moments are only significant to one culture and to the rest of the world they are barely significant blips on the radar. Vimy Ridge would be another good example. Outside Canada it is just part of the Battle of Arras but to us it ranks up there with D-Day.
I take it that conspiracy theorists don't brush their teeth?
(http://i.imgur.com/xN9Ckpn.jpg)
There's a bunch if republican cartoonists saying that we shouldn't rush to judgement on the cop.
There's a bunch if republican cartoonists saying that we shouldn't rush to judgement on the cop.
My irony meter didn't just break, it shattered into individual atoms.
There's a bunch if republican cartoonists saying that we shouldn't rush to judgement on the cop.
My irony meter didn't just break, it shattered into individual atoms.
Mine did the impossible and separated the individual quarks from their mates.
There's a bunch if republican cartoonists saying that we shouldn't rush to judgement on the cop.
My irony meter didn't just break, it shattered into individual atoms.
Mine did the impossible and separated the individual quarks from their mates.
Mine got together with some of its mates and went to a bar to get smashed.
There's a bunch if republican cartoonists saying that we shouldn't rush to judgement on the cop.
My irony meter didn't just break, it shattered into individual atoms.
Mine did the impossible and separated the individual quarks from their mates.
Mine got together with some of its mates and went to a bar to get smashed.
Yeah?! Well...ehm...fuck. Ya got me there. Fancy an ale?
Conservatives: When our president takes 407 vacations it's perfectly alright, he works hard and deserves it.It's only wrong if it's a black guy!
When your president takes 125 vacations within the same time he's clearly a shitty president and can't lead.
I'd say it has less to do with him being black and more to do with him being a democrat.
But speaking of racism...
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image18.jpg)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t1.0-9/10325250_627394870686689_6531768232452509960_n.jpg)
not sure if poe, but it's pretty telling that they compare themselves to klansmen.
What is wrong with that guy's teeth?Maybe he eats too much sugar and doesn't brush them.
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/e038e6a9a493fb74dee439f6b8736415/tumblr_naq1m2il2H1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Could someone condem these comics? It'd make me less pissed.
(http://i.imgur.com/KBEvrjG.gif)
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/67954f0a60a8a15ea34a74a194d3dd7e/tumblr_nah33feV4s1s966nho1_500.jpg)
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/b4325cf05fae34be6b7f07927b8d75b6/tumblr_nax5s2RgTC1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/61e07d7990e8e7a9b02af383ca075ca8/tumblr_nav6f7c1yd1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
Rant:(click to show/hide)
I CONDEMN THOSE COMICS TO THE WALL OF CHRISCHAN.Hey, that's going to far.
How's that?
I must have missed that part in the Lego Movie.I think it is a reference to Idris Elba being cast as Heimdall in the Thor movies. Because having a black actor play an alien based on a cartoon character slightly inspired by norse legends is an evil multiculturalist plot to destroy the aryan race.
Edit:Out of curiosity googled "Tales of The Nordic Vikings" (with quotes).
The only result that came up was from the archives of a site called "White Aryan Resistance".
The only ones who complained about a black actor kissing a white actress in Iron sky were yankees (they didn't mind the blood and gore or space nazis from the moon but interracial relationships are TOO HOT FOR AMERICA!) and I don't think I've even heard any Finnish racists complaining about movies with interracial couples.Well, the white woman in question was a prime example of pure, blond, Aryan genetic stock. It is obvious that the Jewish conspiracy funded this movie in order to spit in the eye of the proud white race warriors and spread the multicultural propaganda by having the negroid subhuman debase this symbolism of purity.
I've got something: CHILDREN AND ANIMALS CANNOT GIVE CONSENT FOR SEXUAL ACTS.
I've got something: CHILDREN AND ANIMALS CANNOT GIVE CONSENT FOR SEXUAL ACTS.
Also, and I'm no expert here, but I'm pretty sure "a pyramid" is the second most perverse thing Jewish people can either build themselves or commission other people to build, after a concentration camp with a giant swastika statue in the middle. Admittedly, it might be third behind "a poisoned well".
I've got something: CHILDREN AND ANIMALS CANNOT GIVE CONSENT FOR SEXUAL ACTS.
Animals have sex with each other all the time. Is that wrong?
Also, and I'm no expert here, but I'm pretty sure "a pyramid" is the second most perverse thing Jewish people can either build themselves or commission other people to build, after a concentration camp with a giant swastika statue in the middle. Admittedly, it might be third behind "a poisoned well".
Perhaps, except for the little detail that Egypt enslaving Israelite populations never actually happened.
I've got something: CHILDREN AND ANIMALS CANNOT GIVE CONSENT FOR SEXUAL ACTS.
Animals have sex with each other all the time. Is that wrong?
HEH.
GUMSHOEING DRUM ARE YOU TO SUD THAT I HZ GONE BX FONT ASTRAY BUY UIHSVBR COME SN COMETARY TO BE THE ONE TO ONE BI SLAY
I DON'T KNOW WHY I'M TYPING WITH MY EYES CLOSED EITHER!
...Pendra.HEH.
GUMSHOEING DRUM ARE YOU TO SUD THAT I HZ GONE BX FONT ASTRAY BUY UIHSVBR COME SN COMETARY TO BE THE ONE TO ONE BI SLAY
I DON'T KNOW WHY I'M TYPING WITH MY EYES CLOSED EITHER!
...what.
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Murder.They're all WRONG!
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Rape.
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Cannibalism.
You know what all these have in common?
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Murder.They're all WRONG!
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Rape.
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Cannibalism.
You know what all these have in common?
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Murder.They're all WRONG!
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Rape.
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Cannibalism.
You know what all these have in common?
I was going for the "they lack consent on one side" answer, but I suppose that works.
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Murder.They're all WRONG!
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Rape.
You know what else is natural in the animal kingdom? Cannibalism.
You know what all these have in common?
I was going for the "they lack consent on one side" answer, but I suppose that works.
I thought you were going to go for - if you can manage all 3 its a fun Saturday night.
I've seen somebody say that homosexuality is unnatural, then when confronted with the fact that it's also found in over 400 species of animals, say "well, cannibalism is also found in the wild! Should we allow that too?"
So yes, naturalistic fallacy on both sides.
So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves."
I've seen somebody say that homosexuality is unnatural, then when confronted with the fact that it's also found in over 400 species of animals, say "well, cannibalism is also found in the wild! Should we allow that too?"
So yes, naturalistic fallacy on both sides.Quote from: John 6:53 (NASB)So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves."
No, see THAT part is symbolic! Not like the entire rest of the bible, which is 100% fact!Except that part about God declaring BSDM a blessing unto man.
Or the part where Jesus goes super saiyan.No, see THAT part is symbolic! Not like the entire rest of the bible, which is 100% fact!Except that part about God declaring BSDM a blessing unto man.
Or the part where Jesus goes super saiyan.No, see THAT part is symbolic! Not like the entire rest of the bible, which is 100% fact!Except that part about God declaring BSDM a blessing unto man.
(http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/c/c4/Sexualdirection.jpg)
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.es/1/15/Male_dominance.jpg)
I like it! ;D
He's so gay he allegedly fucked hundreds of women just to make sure he didn't like het sex....and got HIV.
He's so gay he allegedly fucked hundreds of women just to make sure he didn't like het sex....and got HIV.
A Wyatt Mann lives in a bizarro universe.
He's so gay he allegedly fucked hundreds of women just to make sure he didn't like het sex....and got HIV.
A Wyatt Mann lives in a bizarro universe.
I wonder if he made a cartoon about Eazy-E. He was also straight, and he died from AIDS.
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/f3ukna.jpg)
I'll admit, this cartoon does raise a good point about misogyny perpetrated by women. However, to say that this kind of judgmental sexism comes exclusively (or even primarily) from women is nothing short of absurd.
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/f3ukna.jpg)
I'll admit, this cartoon does raise a good point about misogyny perpetrated by women. However, to say that this kind of judgmental sexism comes exclusively (or even primarily) from women is nothing short of absurd.
Paragon; I think you're an awesome person & a great friend....but I can't read this.
I know I get on your nerves with the whole "Too Big/Too Small" thing but please try to post things in a reasonable size.
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/f3ukna.jpg)
I'll admit, this cartoon does raise a good point about misogyny perpetrated by women. However, to say that this kind of judgmental sexism comes exclusively (or even primarily) from women is nothing short of absurd.
Paragon; I think you're an awesome person & a great friend....but I can't read this.
I know I get on your nerves with the whole "Too Big/Too Small" thing but please try to post things in a reasonable size.
Sorry. Maybe I should learn image manipulation.(click to show/hide)
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/f3ukna.jpg)Perfect example of a good point lost to MRA's.
I'll admit, this cartoon does raise a good point about misogyny perpetrated by women. However, to say that this kind of judgmental sexism comes exclusively (or even primarily) from women is nothing short of absurd.
I've actually seen the original, which is just the part on the left. So, apparently, MRA's can't imagine that women face any actual challenges, and just blame women for their problems.
I've actually seen the original, which is just the part on the left. So, apparently, MRA's can't imagine that women face any actual challenges, and just blame women for their problems.
I've actually seen the original, which is just the part on the left. So, apparently, MRA's can't imagine that women face any actual challenges, and just blame women for their problems.
Ah, so that explains the awkward editing with the use of the exact same pics.
At least I put some effort into my re-edits, as my latest has shown (and it's funny!).
I've actually seen the original, which is just the part on the left. So, apparently, MRA's can't imagine that women face any actual challenges, and just blame women for their problems.
Ah, so that explains the awkward editing with the use of the exact same pics.
At least I put some effort into my re-edits, as my latest has shown (and it's funny!).
I've actually seen the original, which is just the part on the left. So, apparently, MRA's can't imagine that women face any actual challenges, and just blame women for their problems.
Ah, so that explains the awkward editing with the use of the exact same pics.
At least I put some effort into my re-edits, as my latest has shown (and it's funny!).
I thought that was well made and got the point across pretty well.
The point being that some of the opression the women face comes from other women. Seriously, slutshaming and stuff like that is quite commonly thrown by other women.
If this was trying to imply that ALL the opression women face comes from other women then it was mistaken.
I've actually seen the original, which is just the part on the left. So, apparently, MRA's can't imagine that women face any actual challenges, and just blame women for their problems.
Ah, so that explains the awkward editing with the use of the exact same pics.
At least I put some effort into my re-edits, as my latest has shown (and it's funny!).
I thought that was well made and got the point across pretty well.
The point being that some of the opression the women face comes from other women. Seriously, slutshaming and stuff like that is quite commonly thrown by other women.
If this was trying to imply that ALL the opression women face comes from other women then it was mistaken.
I agree, there is some truth to it.
Actually, that's the thing.Nope, it was misandry, wake up sheeple.
The original comic didn't specify the gender of the speaker(s) at all.
It was MRAs assuming they were male.
(http://www.cwporter.com/jews_image21.jpg)
Yes, a racist.
If I had to speculate, I'd say "Jewish" implies a characteristic: a Jewish banker or a Jewish carpenter is a person who is Jewish among other things. Jew is an identity in itself: you can just say "a Jew", nothing else. And so, if you are an antisemite* and want to suggest that Jewish people are a fundamentally different species rather than a variation within humanity, you use Jew rather than Jewish.
The same pattern appears in racism in general. Racial slurs are usually nouns; you call someone a <slur> rather than a <slur>-ish person.
*or should I say "an antisemitic person"?
I'd say that's pretty accurate.If I had to speculate, I'd say "Jewish" implies a characteristic: a Jewish banker or a Jewish carpenter is a person who is Jewish among other things. Jew is an identity in itself: you can just say "a Jew", nothing else. And so, if you are an antisemite* and want to suggest that Jewish people are a fundamentally different species rather than a variation within humanity, you use Jew rather than Jewish.
The same pattern appears in racism in general. Racial slurs are usually nouns; you call someone a <slur> rather than a <slur>-ish person.
*or should I say "an antisemitic person"?
I get it. It's like how a bigot would describe a black person as "a black" like the latter person was a space alien or something.
(http://i31.tinypic.com/2zxttm8.jpg)
FTFY(http://i31.tinypic.com/2zxttm8.jpg)DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT
Anyone who thinks either Bush should have got the Nobel Prize is a partisan hack.
Anyone who thinks either Bush should have got the Nobel Prize is a partisan hack.
Being a Nobel Peace prize laureate doesn't seem to stop someone from getting us embroiled in more wars in the middle east...
(http://i48.tinypic.com/2i4shv.jpg)
Who are you going to trust, a patriotic god-fearing American, or some commie scientist with a phony "PHD" and "legitimate scientific papers supporting his claims".(http://i48.tinypic.com/2i4shv.jpg)
Adding a snarky one liner doesn't make it untrue.
Why did the guy in that picture remind me of Hank Hill?
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/SPICS/spics_image10.jpg)
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/SPICS/spics_image10.jpg)
See the Hot Rap Artist, ORANGE-WIELDING SOMBRERO MAN!
A Hip-Hop clothing store with it's own dating service & Frito Bandito clone hawking citrus in loud fashion. Now that's a store that multi-tasks!
"HANK HILL WITH A BLEACH & LASIK JOB, SQUEEZE MY LEMONS!"
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/SPICS/spics_image10.jpg)
See the Hot Rap Artist, ORANGE-WIELDING SOMBRERO MAN!
A Hip-Hop clothing store with it's own dating service & Frito Bandito clone hawking citrus in loud fashion. Now that's a store that multi-tasks!
"HANK HILL WITH A BLEACH & LASIK JOB, SQUEEZE MY LEMONS!"
Spuki, you never fail to make me smile.
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/x26loh.jpg)What? No homosexuals or gypsies?
While I do wish the subject of honor killings would be discussed far more than it is, exactly who in the British media is saying that nationalist white people are the cause of everything bad? Also, does Britain have a similar flag code to the United States? If so, the woman in the cartoon isn't being very respectful of her country's flag, but I'm sure the irony is lost on her.
While I do wish the subject of honor killings would be discussed far more than it is, exactly who in the British media is saying that nationalist white people are the cause of everything bad? Also, does Britain have a similar flag code to the United States? If so, the woman in the cartoon isn't being very respectful of her country's flag, but I'm sure the irony is lost on her.Don't know what UK flag protocols are, but US codes only forbid cutting up and making clothes out of actual US flags. Using the stars and stripes pattern or even an accurate depiction of a flag in silk screening or material weave to produce clothes is fine.
Aye, its more a violation of the rules of etiquette and social decorum than it is a legal violation.It's also tacky as all hell.
(http://img-9gag-lol.9cache.com/photo/aypejwX_700b.jpg)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fOs0vf3Nwb4/UGH7gqHhcqI/AAAAAAAASdE/vQbkfsTd1ew/s1600/obama-reid-pelosi-gambling-ourmoney.jpg)
You guys do realize that TARP was passed under Bush and that Cap and Trade doesn't involve any deficit spending, right?
That's... actually a legitimate complaint about certain aspects of feminism.I suppose you're right, granted the only people who really complain about those things are tumblr. Also, *parts.
Well, to be fair hijabs are becoming a more accepted, and the anti-childhood thing is thankfully confined to the more radical segments (mostly).
I suppose I only felt it qualified as worst due to the fact it was anti-3rdwave.
Tru, granted like everything it has lots of extremists for instance the black panthers, certain members wanting to kill all cis people, and the needless killing of pets in "shelters".Well, to be fair hijabs are becoming a more accepted, and the anti-childhood thing is thankfully confined to the more radical segments (mostly).
I suppose I only felt it qualified as worst due to the fact it was anti-3rdwave.
I think third-wave feminism gets more flack than it deserves.
Tru, granted like everything it has lots of extremists for instance the black panthers, certain members wanting to kill all cis people, and the needless killing of pets in "shelters".Well, to be fair hijabs are becoming a more accepted, and the anti-childhood thing is thankfully confined to the more radical segments (mostly).
I suppose I only felt it qualified as worst due to the fact it was anti-3rdwave.
I think third-wave feminism gets more flack than it deserves.
Acting like you're some kind of evolved sophisticated superwoman because you're not like *~those breeders~* is just another kind of misogyny.That's... actually a legitimate complaint about certain aspects of feminism.I suppose you're right, granted the only people who really complain about those things are tumblr. Also, *parts.
Acting like you're some kind of evolved sophisticated superwoman because you're not like *~those breeders~* is just another kind of misogyny.That's... actually a legitimate complaint about certain aspects of feminism.I suppose you're right, granted the only people who really complain about those things are tumblr. Also, *parts.
Its a stupid, yet understandable, reaction to the fact that if a woman (or man, though to an admittedly lesser extent) decides she doesn't want children, then she's either treated like a child ("Oh, its just a phase, you'll grow up some day."), like an insane person ("Who doesn't want children?!"), or like a complete, raving loon of a monster ("You just hate children and want them all to die, don't you?"). Thing is, there's more of them than us and it appears (I know its not actually like this, so don't get your knickers in a wad, folks) like every single motherfucker with a squealing sprog throwing a shit-fit because they aren't getting a specific, typically gloriously overpriced, toy has some "choice words" about men and women who don't want one of those vile, vomitous little cretins in our lives. Let's not forget the extreme denial some folks parents go into when their fully grown, adult of a spawn tells them they don't want kids of their own. At least I was lucky in that regard, my dad doesn't really care either way, and my mum both accepts and fully supports my decision, especially given that it came after several years of careful consideration.
PROTIP: People that don't want kids, unless they themselves ARE children, have usually thought shit out. Maybe they don't want to pass along some congenital condition, like how I have a family history of laughable mental health and, oh, god damned brain cancer that killed my maternal grandmother. Maybe they want to be able to take a week off work and spend it in the tropics or something without having to worry about bringing a creature along whose immune system may still be developing, or having to work out the logistics of hiring a nanny for that long. In short, keep your shite opinions to yourselves and bugger right the hell off. Thank you.
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/5a4f61432dc40048347766cb66bbc659/tumblr_n1zv9dz7Os1s8ahpmo1_1280.png)Bait? (Even then, it's really bizarre)
Well, to be fair hijabs are becoming a more accepted, and the anti-childhood thing is thankfully confined to the more radical segments (mostly).
I suppose I only felt it qualified as worst due to the fact it was anti-3rdwave.
I think third-wave feminism gets more flack than it deserves.
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/5a4f61432dc40048347766cb66bbc659/tumblr_n1zv9dz7Os1s8ahpmo1_1280.png)Bait? (Even then, it's really bizarre)
I think the message is quite simple. I think that this is a re-drawn version of some other comic with a similar theme of "A accuses B of being something that A is."Bait? (Even then, it's really bizarre)
I have to admit, I have no idea what the message or point of that cartoon is supposed to be.
And what's going on in Nazi Guy's sign? Super-Hitler threatening a guy with a baguette?
And what's going on in Nazi Guy's sign? Super-Hitler threatening a guy with a baguette?I think it is a rolled up piece of paper. Presumably some type of declaration or something. It looks like the "artist" photoshopped an another racist drawing into that sign but I can't be bothered to go look for the original one.
And what's going on in Nazi Guy's sign? Super-Hitler threatening a guy with a baguette?
I don't know. Maybe it's a crazy newspaper salesman who takes his job very seriously.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1383271_10153179976754156_6074064179225400773_n.jpg?oh=3f0e04646daf9814b550a7cf1d02d8d0&oe=54EFBEF8&__gda__=1423956679_399b07fc5379a9f4281d30fa14c72934)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1383271_10153179976754156_6074064179225400773_n.jpg?oh=3f0e04646daf9814b550a7cf1d02d8d0&oe=54EFBEF8&__gda__=1423956679_399b07fc5379a9f4281d30fa14c72934)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1383271_10153179976754156_6074064179225400773_n.jpg?oh=3f0e04646daf9814b550a7cf1d02d8d0&oe=54EFBEF8&__gda__=1423956679_399b07fc5379a9f4281d30fa14c72934)
You may recall that back when Obama first campaigned for President, Time Magazine, or maybe it was The New Yorker, ran a cover with a cartoon of Obama and Michelle dressed in desert robes, holding AK's and giving each other a fist-bump. It was meant as satire of the rightwingnut media pundits. The fist-bump happened between the Obamas after a campaign speech, and the usual clueless old white conservative fuckwits freaked out, calling that common gesture a "thug" or "terrorist" hand signal.
I believe this cartoon above is just an example of Daryl Cagle, a respected cartoonist who for decades has been consistently even handed in critiquing pols from both parties, poking fun at rightwingnut hype.
The guy's shirt is a looks like the Ukrainian or Swedish flag. Is the cartoonist saying that Ukrainians & Swedes are Somali Ebola victim fellatio fans?
Really gross & stupid.
Oh, I think it's probably some Far-Right Swedish reactionary's way to say "I hate all these Somali immigrants!".
...That's too weird for me to believe it's not photoshopped.
...That's too weird for me to believe it's not photoshopped.
...That's too weird for me to believe it's not photoshopped.
Agreed.
What with the motorcyclist? Is he supposed to be a riot cop? Looks like a race car driver.
The thing is that racists on 4chan in particular and elsewhere as well REALLY hate Sweden.I hate assembling my own furniture with an Allen key just as much as anyone else, but that level of hatred just seems silly.
...That's too weird for me to believe it's not photoshopped.
Agreed.
What with the motorcyclist? Is he supposed to be a riot cop? Looks like a race car driver.
What the actual fuck.
I'm pretty sure killing off neck beards would reduce /pol/'s base.
...I don't get that last one.Liberals.
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/c1bf54321336a87abd12bf52898b00de/tumblr_ndo4yx0vDx1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Why is the white het dude wearing his briefs on the outside of his pants?
Kids nowadays are so weird, amirite?I blame rap music.
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/c1bf54321336a87abd12bf52898b00de/tumblr_ndo4yx0vDx1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Why is the white het dude wearing his briefs on the outside of his pants?
OK, after all that time getting invaded, enslaved, exiled, persecuted, gassed to death, and made the subject of virtually every conspiracy theory ever, I have to ask:
What the hell is with everyone dogpiling on the Jews?
OK, after all that time getting invaded, enslaved, exiled, persecuted, gassed to death, and made the subject of virtually every conspiracy theory ever, I have to ask:Christian and Muslim mistrust/hatred of Jews began in the middle ages. The Christians didn't like them due to them killing Jesus according to the bible (well, technically it was the Romans who killed him and even then it was just as planned, so either someone didn't understand the point in the bible or it was done on purpose to distance the two religions or something.) while Muslims started hating Jews after Mohammed got some personal grudge with them.
What the hell is with everyone dogpiling on the Jews?
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/c1bf54321336a87abd12bf52898b00de/tumblr_ndo4yx0vDx1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)
Well, let me try to add something, then. The Christians and Muslims were forbidden by their religions from profiting by charging interest for loans. The Jews who had no such qualms became bankers for them. So, they were not only outsiders but often wealthy outsiders and the fact that a big source of their wealth was seen as sinful just increased the envy and bitterness.
Well, let me try to add something, then. The Christians and Muslims were forbidden by their religions from profiting by charging interest for loans. The Jews who had no such qualms became bankers for them. So, they were not only outsiders but often wealthy outsiders and the fact that a big source of their wealth was seen as sinful just increased the envy and bitterness.
Not only did they not have qualms, banking was one of the few industries a middle- or upper-class Jewish person could get involved in. They were, in many areas, legally barred from working in medicine, working in law, holding public office, etc.
Well, let me try to add something, then. The Christians and Muslims were forbidden by their religions from profiting by charging interest for loans. The Jews who had no such qualms became bankers for them. So, they were not only outsiders but often wealthy outsiders and the fact that a big source of their wealth was seen as sinful just increased the envy and bitterness.
Not only did they not have qualms, banking was one of the few industries a middle- or upper-class Jewish person could get involved in. They were, in many areas, legally barred from working in medicine, working in law, holding public office, etc.
So basically, self-fulfilling racism, which is basically what most institutional racism is?
Well, let me try to add something, then. The Christians and Muslims were forbidden by their religions from profiting by charging interest for loans. The Jews who had no such qualms became bankers for them. So, they were not only outsiders but often wealthy outsiders and the fact that a big source of their wealth was seen as sinful just increased the envy and bitterness.
Not only did they not have qualms, banking was one of the few industries a middle- or upper-class Jewish person could get involved in. They were, in many areas, legally barred from working in medicine, working in law, holding public office, etc.
So basically, self-fulfilling racism, which is basically what most institutional racism is?
Yes. The Christians needed the Jews to handle the banking but this meant that the Jews became wealthy and when you have wealthy "outsiders" (I keep using this term and should explain that I mean it in the sense of "US vs THEM" mentality having a clear enemy/rival to unite the people. Jews were handy in this since fomenting hate towards foreigners might not be a good idea if you want allies but Jews were everywhere but did not hold much power so hating them had no diplomatic downsides.) it is easy to hate them.
Just to underscore how lowly and vicious the propaganda bigotry against Jews was/is; bankers weren't even a substantial percentage of the Jewish population. The other "allowed" higher income occupation, being a jeweler, was also viewed as cause for resentment (note that the English word for gemstone trinkets was conventionally based on the word "Jew"), as were Jewish merchants and shop owners. Most Jews, though, were working class artisans and laborers, like tailors, bakers, cobblers, brick masons, trash carters and street sweepers, again because of being legally barred from many job classes.
Just to underscore how lowly and vicious the propaganda bigotry against Jews was/is; bankers weren't even a substantial percentage of the Jewish population. The other "allowed" higher income occupation, being a jeweler, was also viewed as cause for resentment (note that the English word for gemstone trinkets was conventionally based on the word "Jew"), as were Jewish merchants and shop owners. Most Jews, though, were working class artisans and laborers, like tailors, bakers, cobblers, brick masons, trash carters and street sweepers, again because of being legally barred from many job classes.
That alone is a really cool fact and I thank you.
(note that the English word for gemstone trinkets was conventionally based on the word "Jew")
jewel (n.)
late 13c., "article of value used for adornment," from Anglo-French juel, Old French jouel "ornament, jewel" (12c.), perhaps from Medieval Latin jocale, from Latin jocus "pastime, sport," in Vulgar Latin "that which causes joy" (see joke (n.)). Another theory traces it to Latin gaudium, also with a notion of "rejoice" (see joy).
It's what I learned in history class years ago. So, either the textbook was wrong, or the etymologists have other theories. The spelling seems a little too coinky-dinky, regardless, especially considering the centuries-long tradition of diamond and other gemstone transport, import, stone cutting and setting, especially amongst Hasidim and Sephardic Jews.The word "Jew" derives from Judah. In the Torah, Judah was one of the twelve sons of Jacob/Israel, and the founder of one of the twelve tribes. After the reign of King Solomon, Judah seceded from Israel and became an independent country.
Consider also that it might be the other way around; Hebrews or Israelites getting tagged with what is otherwise a seemingly non sequitur sounding name of "Jew", from their association with jewels?
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0005_0_05194.html
It's what I learned in history class years ago. So, either the textbook was wrong, or the etymologists have other theories. The spelling seems a little too coinky-dinky, regardless, especially considering the centuries-long tradition of diamond and other gemstone transport, import, stone cutting and setting, especially amongst Hasidim and Sephardic Jews.The Medieval British nobility spoke French so a lot of the words in modern English that refer to things that used to be connected to the nobility's lifestyle are derived from that language. That's why the other explanation sounds more credible to me but I'm no etymologist either. It's pretty common to have similar sounding words that mean completely different things and have evolved from different root words. I can also say that history textbooks can be and have been wrong: when years have gone by I remember having found out about minor mistakes with things I was taught but can't really recall any specific examples.
Consider also that it might be the other way around; Hebrews or Israelites getting tagged with what is otherwise a seemingly non sequitur sounding name of "Jew", from their association with jewels?
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0005_0_05194.html
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/488287c0518e5ba0932fc2d7ec296f90/tumblr_nefki6VoSI1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Is that supposed to represent the media? Because when has the media kept a cool head about ebola? Ever?
Is that supposed to represent the media? Because when has the media kept a cool head about ebola? Ever?I think it's meant to be liberals.
Is that supposed to represent the media? Because when has the media kept a cool head about ebola? Ever?I think it's meant to be liberals.
Is that supposed to represent the media? Because when has the media kept a cool head about ebola? Ever?I think it's meant to be liberals.
Or a really bad Strawman of liberals.
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/v2tyd1.jpg)
I really just like the "Only get afraid of things Fox News tells us to be afraid of." Message.Is that supposed to represent the media? Because when has the media kept a cool head about ebola? Ever?I think it's meant to be liberals.
Or a really bad Strawman of liberals.
I don't think it's possible for conservatives to bring up liberals without creating at least a dozen strawmen.
Can these awful people at least have more than one caricature for a Jewish person?
Can these awful people at least have more than one caricature for a Jewish person?
Most anti-Semites in the West are poorartistsplagiarists.
Can these awful people at least have more than one caricature for a Jewish person?
Most anti-Semites in the West are poor artists.
(http://33.media.tumblr.com/faca82639fedf92e5874f35e9ecb993b/tumblr_nejrpk8GH91r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
iDidn't know that the homosexuals are a separate gender.(http://33.media.tumblr.com/faca82639fedf92e5874f35e9ecb993b/tumblr_nejrpk8GH91r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
iDon'tCare
iDidn't know that the homosexuals are a separate gender.(http://33.media.tumblr.com/faca82639fedf92e5874f35e9ecb993b/tumblr_nejrpk8GH91r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
iDon'tCare
Or at least I assume that is what the comic is implying.
"iTrans*" doesn't effectively fit in the space he's given the word.
The immigrants don't even look remotely threatening in this. The cartoonist must not be very good at race-baiting.
The second cartoon doesn't look all that bad. Of course, I feel that I might be interpreting that in a different way than the cartoon maker, so there's that.Well, the fact that everyone depicted is white and the fact they're stocking up on tactical gear isn't portrayed negatively doesn't help the vibe "White people must defend themselves from savage negroid." vibe.
The fact that they're getting gas masks suggests to me that their reaction is a bit overblown.The second cartoon doesn't look all that bad. Of course, I feel that I might be interpreting that in a different way than the cartoon maker, so there's that.Well, the fact that everyone depicted is white and the fact they're stocking up on tactical gear isn't portrayed negatively doesn't help the vibe "White people must defend themselves from savage negroid." vibe.
The fact that they're getting gas masks suggests to me that their reaction is a bit overblown.The second cartoon doesn't look all that bad. Of course, I feel that I might be interpreting that in a different way than the cartoon maker, so there's that.Well, the fact that everyone depicted is white and the fact they're stocking up on tactical gear isn't portrayed negatively doesn't help the vibe "White people must defend themselves from savage negroid." vibe.
The fact that they're getting gas masks suggests to me that their reaction is a bit overblown.The second cartoon doesn't look all that bad. Of course, I feel that I might be interpreting that in a different way than the cartoon maker, so there's that.Well, the fact that everyone depicted is white and the fact they're stocking up on tactical gear isn't portrayed negatively doesn't help the vibe "White people must defend themselves from savage negroid." vibe.
Do gas masks protect you from tear gas? Because then it might be justified.
The fact that they're getting gas masks suggests to me that their reaction is a bit overblown.The second cartoon doesn't look all that bad. Of course, I feel that I might be interpreting that in a different way than the cartoon maker, so there's that.Well, the fact that everyone depicted is white and the fact they're stocking up on tactical gear isn't portrayed negatively doesn't help the vibe "White people must defend themselves from savage negroid." vibe.
Do gas masks protect you from tear gas? Because then it might be justified.
Fair point.
(http://img-9gag-ftw.9cache.com/photo/apox3Pn_700b_v1.jpg)That cartoon would make a good point if you could see actual protests going on in the background and police shooting tear gas at them instead of the looter.
i put it in "worst" because it's very likely to be a sad but true reaction of the rioters. a few care, most go "free looting". besides, why loot over a death? imagine if detroit, baltimore, nyc, or dc got riots over every death...Brown's death was just the straw that broke the camel's back. The community has been disenfranchised and its members abused by police for decades. People are protesting about this one instance but the frustration and anger behind the protest have been brewing for a long time.
MLK said it best:(http://img-9gag-ftw.9cache.com/photo/apox3Pn_700b_v1.jpg)That cartoon would make a good point if you could see actual protests going on in the background and police shooting tear gas at them instead of the looter.Quotei put it in "worst" because it's very likely to be a sad but true reaction of the rioters. a few care, most go "free looting". besides, why loot over a death? imagine if detroit, baltimore, nyc, or dc got riots over every death...Brown's death was just the straw that broke the camel's back. The community has been disenfranchised and its members abused by police for decades. People are protesting about this one instance but the frustration and anger behind the protest have been brewing for a long time.
Does anyone find it weird that the looter looks like a white guy in that cartoon? Or is that just me?
Does anyone find it weird that the looter looks like a white guy in that cartoon? Or is that just me?
Well, some people are just using Michael Brown's death as an excuse to riot. This is the kind of thing that occurs in almost any situation like this.
(http://img-9gag-ftw.9cache.com/photo/apox3Pn_700b_v1.jpg)The media would rather focus on the few looters and rioters than the mass destruction and havoc caused by police.
If you would take that comic 20 years back in time the people of that time would assume that Obama was the invader and that he had been hiding in the house overnight or possibly even longer ...Only to be discovered by the president who was suprisingly chill about the incident.
Appearently Mike Brown was a mage, and was going to kill Wilson with his magic powers from 148 feet away.Duh, he could have used his negro majics!
"It is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society." - Rev. Martin Luther King, 1968.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3H978KlR20 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3H978KlR20)
"It is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society." - Rev. Martin Luther King, 1968.
Yeah, MLK wouldn't be happy about the riots, but he certainly wouldn't ignore what led to them either.On a semi-related note, it's funny whenever people who condemn protestor using violence being used to solve problems in Ferguson are gung hoe about militarizing the police force and bombing anyone we dislike.
I understood most of the others, but what's the "degenerate slut" flag supposed to be in reality?
Yeah, MLK wouldn't be happy about the riots, but he certainly wouldn't ignore what led to them either.
Yeah, MLK wouldn't be happy about the riots, but he certainly wouldn't ignore what led to them either.
"A riot is the language of the unheard." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Yeah, MLK wouldn't be happy about the riots, but he certainly wouldn't ignore what led to them either.
"A riot is the language of the unheard." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
You honestly think that means he'd like them?
And that quote's not entirely accurate. In this case, it's partly true, but there are almost certainly at least some rioters who were just looking for an excuse to go crazy. Besides, people have rioted over the most petty shit imaginable. Soccer games are the stereotypical example, but people have started riots over everything from sandwiches to ballet performances.
Yeah, MLK wouldn't be happy about the riots, but he certainly wouldn't ignore what led to them either.
"A riot is the language of the unheard." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Yeah, MLK wouldn't be happy about the riots, but he certainly wouldn't ignore what led to them either.
"A riot is the language of the unheard." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
"I would hope that we can avoid riots because riots are self-defeating and socially destructive." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
(http://oi60.tinypic.com/dy680l.jpg)Multiculturalism will result in a stronger Britain.
And he gets the badass sword!(http://oi60.tinypic.com/dy680l.jpg)Multiculturalism will result in a stronger Britain.
A good cartoon.
(http://oi60.tinypic.com/dy680l.jpg)
So why don't I see more white kids lining up to become Muslims ::)You shoot one unarmed teenage boy...
Also this is a bit old but it's never too late to tell racists to go fuck themselves.
(http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/07/toon130717.jpg)
Puppy BabySolution: kill all babies
Ruin your carpet. Ruin your life. *
credit to comedian Rita Rudnick
Puppy BabySolution: kill all babies
Ruin your carpet. Ruin your life. *
credit to comedian Rita Rudnick
.
.
"They're trying to ruin all the fun we're having torturing people!"
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/105099517405)
At least he didn't mention the birth certificate...
At this point I am starting to hope that the big fake birth certificate scare was just a convoluted plot to find out info they need to make a porn magazine subscription in Obama's name or something.
That's funny, because the last one is actually close to being true, just not in the way they think. Treating the people you're interrogating well, being understanding, and taking their side (to them) yields quite good results. Hell, you can even use it to get confessions out of people that never actually committed the crime in question. I think the figure I remember reading is that its somewhere in the neighbourhood of 75% effective.A tactic recommended by none less than Sun Tzu.
Also known as Stockholm Syndrome maybe?That's funny, because the last one is actually close to being true, just not in the way they think. Treating the people you're interrogating well, being understanding, and taking their side (to them) yields quite good results. Hell, you can even use it to get confessions out of people that never actually committed the crime in question. I think the figure I remember reading is that its somewhere in the neighbourhood of 75% effective.A tactic recommended by none less than Sun Tzu.
Has anyone, anywhere, actually made the claim that it was racist to be attracted to your own race? I think it's racist to believe that NOBODY should mix romantically with other races, but if it's not your cup of tea, who gives a single airborne fornication?
(http://oi61.tinypic.com/muk0w2.jpg)Ok, so because the person founded planned parenthood was an asshole (a fact Planned Parrebthood makes no effort to conceal) makes the present day orginisation racist how exactly?
(http://oi61.tinypic.com/muk0w2.jpg)Ok, so because the person founded planned parenthood was an asshole (a fact Planned Parrebthood makes no effort to conceal) makes the present day orginisation racist how exactly?
(http://oi61.tinypic.com/muk0w2.jpg)Ok, so because the person founded planned parenthood was an asshole (a fact Planned Parrebthood makes no effort to conceal) makes the present day orginisation racist how exactly?
Because reasons.
I think it says something that my first thought was 'Fubu's still in business?'
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/ngbtyv.jpg)Why is it that whenever reactionaries imagine a minority uprising they only see a reverse of the current power system?
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/ngbtyv.jpg)Why is it that whenever reactionaries imagine a minority uprising they only see a reverse of the current power system?
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/MISC/misc_image01.jpg)
Oh really, Mr. Mann? Didn't you ever learn that Washington, D.C. was designed by an African-American? Or that a major inspiration for the U.S. constitution was the Iroquois Great Law of Peace? Or that it was a Mexican who invented Color TV?
White poeple kill each other at basically the same rate as well.(http://i.imgur.com/KehmbAK.jpg)
The reason for high rates of "black on black crime" is because many neighborhoods in the United States are very racially segregated. So if the typical black American commits a crime, it's statistically more likely to be against another black person than a white person. It's not because black people are eating themselves alive or anything like that.
White poeple kill each other at basically the same rate as well.(http://i.imgur.com/KehmbAK.jpg)
The reason for high rates of "black on black crime" is because many neighborhoods in the United States are very racially segregated. So if the typical black American commits a crime, it's statistically more likely to be against another black person than a white person. It's not because black people are eating themselves alive or anything like that.
(https://41.media.tumblr.com/4cf15e0345323130ca5899e463560b94/tumblr_n873kiFDej1qdptr8o1_500.jpg)
Indeed. Prior to the Age of Exploration, Europe would have been one of the last places you would expect to conquer the world. China had all the technology, Africa had the wealth empires, and Europe was in a near constant state of warfare with itself.(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/MISC/misc_image01.jpg)
Oh really, Mr. Mann? Didn't you ever learn that Washington, D.C. was designed by an African-American? Or that a major inspiration for the U.S. constitution was the Iroquois Great Law of Peace? Or that it was a Mexican who invented Color TV?
Wonder how many of those inventions we would have if people in Asia hadn't' discovered the zero?
Really hard to have a technological civilization without modern math.
As for Sanger, I have always found people trying to discredit her by bringing up that she believed in eugenics kind of ironic since they keep leaving out that Sanger was also against abortion.
SO planned Parenthood was so obsessed with one small part of Sanger's beliefs that they ignored another of her core beliefs? Really?
Korea invented the printing press centuries before Europe did. The medieval Arab world was a hotbed of scientific progress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inventions_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world) and even gave us algebra. Various Native American peoples also had many technologies (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_contributions), such as almanacs, anesthetics, and the basis for many modern medications like aspirin. African-American scientists and inventors have been contributing to science for years. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists) You'd have to be really ignorant of history to not know that other cultures have been independently developing technologies to suit their needs for years, often well before "enlightened" Europeans caught on.
(http://i.imgur.com/hJ9qdb9.png)
It falls in the category of wrong, but funny.(http://i.imgur.com/hJ9qdb9.png)
I have to admit, I laughed at this one.
(http://i.imgur.com/kbXLwTp.jpg)Tinsel is a good example of someone who will complain about "PC" and how sensitive everyone is, then the moment someone insults them they get pissy.
Way to be subtle in your bigotry there, asshole. I'm surprised you didn't go full Tinsel and depict him as greedy.
Tinsel is a good example of someone who will complain about "PC" and how sensitive everyone is, then the moment someone insults them they get pissy.
(http://www.yorkblog.com/teentakeover/files/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-24-at-9.54.22-PM-300x296.png)
(http://www.yorkblog.com/teentakeover/files/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-24-at-9.54.22-PM-300x296.png)
Heh, I've seen a lot of MRA/PUA types claim that it justified for someone to beat a woman half there size if she's somewhat abusive.(http://www.yorkblog.com/teentakeover/files/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-24-at-9.54.22-PM-300x296.png)
That depends, though. Does she think she has free rein to hit him? If not, then she has every right to complain. If so, then that's just an abusive relationship all around.
Yes, thank you so much for implying that I believe all violence is equal and that any time a punch is thrown by a woman that it gives a man license to beat her to a pulp. That's totally what I was actually saying.I...I wasn't meaning to imply that you thought that I just meant in general.
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/d53f2a72a5c2142a8b5efe21a4b52541/tumblr_nicdbwhyEe1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
Obummer is working with the terrorists!
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/d53f2a72a5c2142a8b5efe21a4b52541/tumblr_nicdbwhyEe1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
Obummer is working with the terrorists!
He even gave bin Laden his very own bullet to the head!
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/d53f2a72a5c2142a8b5efe21a4b52541/tumblr_nicdbwhyEe1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
Obummer is working with the terrorists!
He even gave bin Laden his very own bullet to the head!
I would LOVE to see what excuses these guys would conjure up for THAT!
I mean, Obama didn't apprehend Osama...he had Osama KILLED! If Obama was like the big-eared human-string bean in the cartoon, he would've given Osama a trip to the Bahamas or something.
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/d53f2a72a5c2142a8b5efe21a4b52541/tumblr_nicdbwhyEe1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
Obummer is working with the terrorists!
He even gave bin Laden his very own bullet to the head!
I would LOVE to see what excuses these guys would conjure up for THAT!
I mean, Obama didn't apprehend Osama...he had Osama KILLED! If Obama was like the big-eared human-string bean in the cartoon, he would've given Osama a trip to the Bahamas or something.
You're trying to use facts to refute an ideological point.
You can't kill what doesn't count as life.
I have seen posts on Tumblr comparing it to Nazi propaganda. Then again, it is Tumblr, and they're full of crazies.I haven't heard that comparison, but I definitely haven't heard good things about it.
Wow, you're against witch trials, you must want the withes to win.
I'd gladly speak ill of that disgusting psychotic cretin.So Dexter basically?
The only reason he's viewed as a hero and not as a serial killer is because he just so happened to murder people for the government.
I'd gladly speak ill of that disgusting psychotic cretin.So Dexter basically?
The only reason he's viewed as a hero and not as a serial killer is because he just so happened to murder people for the government.
I've known a few people who were in the military, they were all at best slightly fucked in the head. At least a couple of them would be in jail if they hadn't had a proper focus to guide them. That's not to say they were drooling psychos, just not well suited for mainstream boring old society and destined to butt heads with it.
Perhaps. I don't think either doves or hawks really believe war is anything but hell.
At least, not the sane or smart ones anyway.
i hate to say i told you so, but yeah, that's been my point of view in my years on the boards, and my year and a bit here.Perhaps. I don't think either doves or hawks really believe war is anything but hell.
At least, not the sane or smart ones anyway.
Unfortunately, the crazies, morons and extremists tend to scream the loudest.
^ Have to agree there. I'm reminded of a movie several years ago, (but I can't remember its name) that told the story of a unit of military grunt guys who were all prepared and psyched up into the mindset of killing the enemy and when it came down to it, they weren't able to do anything. There was no order to kill/attack, and it was devastating to their minds.
(http://i.imgur.com/bDky2DZ.jpg)
From an MRA Facebook group: a typical (for them) attack on strawman feminism. This stuff pops up on my FB feed regularly thanks to a friend who is a passionate member of the movement.(click to show/hide)
I wonder what song the Oompa Loompas would sing about them.
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/8241c459ddbd6a6ce630f722b3bf4f96/tumblr_nj8i1sjB0A1r8kiyko1_500.jpg)
Big Brother.You'll be first in line when the NWO death camps start.
He knows more about science then most parents do.
(http://ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/United-Nations-Welcome-to-America.jpg)
(http://ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/United-Nations-Welcome-to-America.jpg)The hatred for UN in USA is something that I will never understand.
(http://ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/United-Nations-Welcome-to-America.jpg)The hatred for UN in USA is something that I will never understand.
Because the only time that I remember UN military going against their cause and invading other countries (going as far as demanding the right to use nukes against the resisting country) was when a US general was in charge of the operation. And he had a lot of support in the same groups that now hate UN because he would have been nuking China and North Korea.
[img]http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/liberal-logic-101-1380-500x416.jpg[/image]
There's really no reason for college to be expensive as it is anyways.
When people say "college" in a US context, I'm starting to reflexively hear "sports program".
Oh boo fuckin' hoo, your tax dollars are going towards something that's actually going to help the country instead of going directly into the Koch brothers' pockets. Cry me a fucking river you twat.But muh bootstraps!
When people say "college" in a US context, I'm starting to reflexively hear "sports program".
(http://i.imgur.com/HXieg3S.jpg)
Big Brother.You'll be first in line when the NWO death camps start.
He knows more about science then most parents do.
(http://i.imgur.com/HXieg3S.jpg)
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/vmr97s.jpg)
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/vmr97s.jpg)
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/vmr97s.jpg).....then the FBI, CIA and every other alphabet organization, in their intense research, caught this turkey, charged him with mass-murder & treason and sentenced him to DEATH!He doesn't even plant the bomb and just spends his time complaining about juice on /pol/
8) The End! 8)
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/vmr97s.jpg).....then the FBI, CIA and every other alphabet organization, in their intense research, caught this turkey, charged him with mass-murder & treason and sentenced him to DEATH!He doesn't even plant the bomb and just spends his time complaining about juice on /pol/
8) The End! 8)
Juice = Jews. It is a joke.
And yes, /pol/ is on 4Chan. And generally considered the worst board by most of the users who aren't horrible racists and conspiracy theorists.
(http://aattp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Screen-Shot-2014-11-25-at-7.52.36-AM.png)That'll show him to be black!
(http://i.imgur.com/Mul49Zp.jpg)(http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/cb120814dAPC20141208050122.jpg)(click to show/hide)
Edit: big image made smaller
It says nothing.
Seriously, what the fuck is the point of the cartoon?
It says nothing.
Seriously, what the fuck is the point of the cartoon?
Simple: a paycheck.
I researched that last cartoon. It's by Chip Bok, a conservative cartoonist. My take on it is it's a "hur-dur he asked for it" thing. Contemptuous shit. And funny how the anti-tax types are just fine with a joke that the guy died for not paying taxes. Garner gets dismissed out of hand because he's not white.
I researched that last cartoon. It's by Chip Bok, a conservative cartoonist. My take on it is it's a "hur-dur he asked for it" thing. Contemptuous shit. And funny how the anti-tax types are just fine with a joke that the guy died for not paying taxes. Garner gets dismissed out of hand because he's not white.
Well, I'd argue the opposite. Since American conservatives are hardly pro-tax, I think he's condemning Garner's death.
I researched that last cartoon. It's by Chip Bok, a conservative cartoonist. My take on it is it's a "hur-dur he asked for it" thing. Contemptuous shit. And funny how the anti-tax types are just fine with a joke that the guy died for not paying taxes. Garner gets dismissed out of hand because he's not white.
Well, I'd argue the opposite. Since American conservatives are hardly pro-tax, I think he's condemning Garner's death.
They are also against all healthcare and generally helping people after they have been born (apart from the rich "job creators" that is.) so the "he asked for it" stance is quite probable.
Shouldn't the 'Victim Card' one be under Good Cartoons or whatever? It fists the actions of Fundies/conservatives to the letter.
Shouldn't the 'Victim Card' one be under Good Cartoons or whatever? It fists the actions of Fundies/conservatives to the letter.
Depends on who made the cartoon. If a progressive made it, then I'll agree with you. If a wingnut made it, then it's stupid.
Shouldn't the 'Victim Card' one be under Good Cartoons or whatever? It fists the actions of Fundies/conservatives to the letter.
Depends on who made the cartoon. If a progressive made it, then I'll agree with you. If a wingnut made it, then it's stupid.
See that's my point they are not 'best' because they support your view. They are 'best' by being original, funny, well drawn, thought provoking, clear in their message and perhaps capable of swaying someone on the fence if not the other side. They are 'worst' because they fail to clearly convey their message, are confused, badly drawn, not funny or derivative.
Both the cartoons in question are worse because regardless of their message, they objectively suck hairy wookie balls.
Shouldn't the 'Victim Card' one be under Good Cartoons or whatever? It fists the actions of Fundies/conservatives to the letter.
Depends on who made the cartoon. If a progressive made it, then I'll agree with you. If a wingnut made it, then it's stupid.
See that's my point they are not 'best' because they support your view. They are 'best' by being original, funny, well drawn, thought provoking, clear in their message and perhaps capable of swaying someone on the fence if not the other side. They are 'worst' because they fail to clearly convey their message, are confused, badly drawn, not funny or derivative.
Both the cartoons in question are worse because regardless of their message, they objectively suck hairy wookie balls.
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
Who knows? But wouldn't it be hilarious if it turned out he was a very dedicated satirist?
True.Shouldn't the 'Victim Card' one be under Good Cartoons or whatever? It fists the actions of Fundies/conservatives to the letter.
Depends on who made the cartoon. If a progressive made it, then I'll agree with you. If a wingnut made it, then it's stupid.
See that's my point they are not 'best' because they support your view. They are 'best' by being original, funny, well drawn, thought provoking, clear in their message and perhaps capable of swaying someone on the fence if not the other side. They are 'worst' because they fail to clearly convey their message, are confused, badly drawn, not funny or derivative.
Both the cartoons in question are worse because regardless of their message, they objectively suck hairy wookie balls.
The last part or your post suddenly brought a flashback of a stupid early internet meme involving Chewbacca or Mr. T and human testicle consumption.
OH GREAT!....now some crudely-animated CGI baby is doing the "Hamster Dance" to Peanut Butter Jelly Time in my head!
........now a dead whale explodes on an Oregon beach! HELP MEEEEEEEEEEE!
True.Shouldn't the 'Victim Card' one be under Good Cartoons or whatever? It fists the actions of Fundies/conservatives to the letter.
Depends on who made the cartoon. If a progressive made it, then I'll agree with you. If a wingnut made it, then it's stupid.
See that's my point they are not 'best' because they support your view. They are 'best' by being original, funny, well drawn, thought provoking, clear in their message and perhaps capable of swaying someone on the fence if not the other side. They are 'worst' because they fail to clearly convey their message, are confused, badly drawn, not funny or derivative.
Both the cartoons in question are worse because regardless of their message, they objectively suck hairy wookie balls.
The last part or your post suddenly brought a flashback of a stupid early internet meme involving Chewbacca or Mr. T and human testicle consumption.
OH GREAT!....now some crudely-animated CGI baby is doing the "Hamster Dance" to Peanut Butter Jelly Time in my head!
........now a dead whale explodes on an Oregon beach! HELP MEEEEEEEEEEE!
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US.
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
Who knows? But wouldn't it be hilarious if it turned out he was actually a very dedicated satirist?
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
Who knows? But wouldn't it be hilarious if it turned out he was actually a very dedicated satirist?
At some point it stops mattering if you're being super racist or just ironically super racist. The observable results are the same.
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
Who knows? But wouldn't it be hilarious if it turned out he was a very dedicated satirist?
A "Deep-Cover Liberal"? Now THAT would be something!
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
Who knows? But wouldn't it be hilarious if it turned out he was actually a very dedicated satirist?
At some point it stops mattering if you're being super racist or just ironically super racist. The observable results are the same.
Of course. How else could "Poe's Law" exist.
Personally, I feel that A Wyatt Mann really believes the junk he draws. *yuck*
*BLEH*
Who the heck is this A Wyatt Mann guy, anyway? Is there any info on him? A bio? His real name? Is it a "he"? What if A Wyatt Mann's a "she". A Wyatt Mann could be a dog or a Klingon or a kumquat for all I care!
Who knows? But wouldn't it be hilarious if it turned out he was actually a very dedicated satirist?
At some point it stops mattering if you're being super racist or just ironically super racist. The observable results are the same.
Of course. How else could "Poe's Law" exist.
Personally, I feel that A Wyatt Mann really believes the junk he draws. *yuck*
My point is, why do we care whether this guy actually believes what he says or not? The cartoons are still there. If A. Wyatt Man cartoons are bad, they are bad regardless of the mental state of the person making them. Short of actually meeting the guy, whether he is a satirist or not is kind of an empty question.
There are a bunch of A Wyatt Mann's cartoons up on resist.com, the website of the White Aryan Resistance. Not linking it, you can look it up yourself if you want to.
According to Encyclopedia Dramatica, his real name is Wyatt Kaldenberg. Kaldenberg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyatt_Kaldenberg) is definitely a real person and was active in the white nationalist movement in the past, but has now left it. Not because he stopped being a racist, mind you, but because he thinks all the White Nationalist/Nazi stuff doesn't help the average white Joe who is being attacked by liberals and the lesser races and such.
He now writes books promoting Odinism (http://www.amazon.com/Folkish-Odinism-Wyatt-Kaldenberg/dp/1492297348/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8) and attacking the racist movement (http://www.amazon.com/Nazism-Racism-Nothing-Empower-Leftists-ebook/dp/B0060MB3FS). Which is an improvement over his cartooning, at least.
(http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Cartoon-Holocaust-Hvor-Laenge-Kan-Myten-Opretholdes-700.jpg)[citation needed]
Even if the holocaust was discovered to have been a myth. What the fuck doesn't matter?
So holocaust deniers are pissed off because they can't hate Jews because of the holocaust, so they try to deny the holocaust so they can be justified in their unjustifiable hatred for a group of people?
While Holocaust deniers are sure that the Holocaust was a zionist conspiracy, they usually consider that it would have been a good thing had it been done.
Because sheep can totally give consent.
Seriously, I could conceive of arguments against using consent as a standard for marriage. They wouldn't necessarily be good arguments, but they would be arguments. But with fundamentalists, I have actually never even heard them address the c word. Never.
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/10oqnit.jpg)
You misspelled "outta". ;)
You misspelled "outta". ;)
I probably should've just spelled it "off of", but that's how Mick pronounced it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Mu0M-bN3E
(Wanted to embed, but it wouldn't work!)
You misspelled "outta". ;)
I probably should've just spelled it "off of", but that's how Mick pronounced it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Mu0M-bN3E
(Wanted to embed, but it wouldn't work!)
FTFY
...Lizard, what the hell is that comic supposed to mean?It's upset at people who headcannon the Harry Potter characters as anything but white.
I assume those are Ginny and Harry from Harry Potter, based on the lightning scar, but that doesn't help at all (and I may be wrong on that assumption as well.)
...Lizard, what the hell is that comic supposed to mean?It's upset at people who headcannon the Harry Potter characters as anything but white.
I assume those are Ginny and Harry from Harry Potter, based on the lightning scar, but that doesn't help at all (and I may be wrong on that assumption as well.)
To clarify, I don't really care about headcannons. It's just that getting upset at someone over a headcannon about a characters race is pointlessy petty at best and racist at worst....Lizard, what the hell is that comic supposed to mean?It's upset at people who headcannon the Harry Potter characters as anything but white.
I assume those are Ginny and Harry from Harry Potter, based on the lightning scar, but that doesn't help at all (and I may be wrong on that assumption as well.)
Ginny's a red-head. I think the girl in the cartoon is supposed to be Hermione since she has really curly brown hair.
And I'll be sitting over here under the "Pet the nerd" sign.
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/34osrox.jpg)Wait, where is the blood from? It's clearly very fresh (notice how there is still enough blood to drip from the knife and the blood hasn't dried) so he had to have stabbed someone in the past couple seconds. It's possible it's suppose to be that Santa slit the kids throat but he doesn't appear to be in pain.
To clarify, I don't really care about headcannons.
To be fair, if you headcanon Ginny Weasley or Harry Potter as not white... um... you're kinda... wrong.
And finally, also, wouldn't "Tranny Danny" be a more appropriate thing to call her? I mean, aren't degenerates the name for people who have bred with other races or cultures and Transgender individuals are suppose to be mentally ill.
...kind of the point of headcanon that it doesn't necessarily have to follow the original text?
Otherwise it would just be canon.
...kind of the point of headcanon that it doesn't necessarily have to follow the original text?
Otherwise it would just be canon.
Speaking as a member of the Touhou fandom, as in, this is how we use the term, headcanon covers anything that isn't either explicitly covered nor denied by canon. In the Touhou fandom, this comes up a lot, as there's not a whole lot of canon information for many characters, so a lot of gaps have to be filled in by headcanon in order to make them a complete character. Making something up like "Harry Potter is actually Indian" wouldn't be headcanon so much as it would be AU, or "alternate universe", the term used for stuff that is contradictory to canon but consistent in its own universe.
Again, just explaining how I use the term "headcanon", and why something like what we see in the cartoon would not be "headcanon" to me.
Well, I don't think Harry was stated to be white in the books.
(I think, I don't read them)
(http://41.media.tumblr.com/ba7e4ffbd6775f9f4dd24002e438fe35/tumblr_nlcztvxCXe1s966nho1_1280.jpg)
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/edf9f1f7d95c492b3a48f36dd73736f8/tumblr_nlc1g3t9zJ1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
What the hell is wrong with his neck?
Well no, but that's not really related to the neck, which is just a result of terrible artwork.(http://41.media.tumblr.com/ba7e4ffbd6775f9f4dd24002e438fe35/tumblr_nlcztvxCXe1s966nho1_1280.jpg)
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/edf9f1f7d95c492b3a48f36dd73736f8/tumblr_nlc1g3t9zJ1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
What the hell is wrong with his neck?
They're really not disguising their bigotry, anymore, aren't they?
When has the Department of Justice ever tried to stir up racial tensions? Commented on them where they already exist? Yes. Create them ex nihilo? Please.Only racist suggest that racism might exist!
http://m.imgur.com/FfMh97a
As a Christian I am more oppressed than any other group!!!!111!!!
Dumb as fuck message with no factual basis, though.
Apparently Mike Lester is abusive:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/Article/Editorial-Cartoonist-Mike-Lester-Arrested-After-Domestic-Incident
Who would have guessed that this great guy would be a drunken wife-beater?
Don't ya know, Spukes? Women are supposed to be demure lil hausfraus that spend their days cooking, cleaning, shutting up, and putting out. After all, its a big, scary world out there and we don't want our ladies' delicate sensibilities to be overwhelmed.
Don't ya know, Spukes? Women are supposed to be demure lil hausfraus that spend their days cooking, cleaning, shutting up, and putting out. After all, its a big, scary world out there and we don't want our ladies' delicate sensibilities to be overwhelmed.
Either that, or he was paranoid that his wife was cheating on him. Can't imagine why she'd do such a thing </s>.
Don't ya know, Spukes? Women are supposed to be demure lil hausfraus that spend their days cooking, cleaning, shutting up, and putting out. After all, its a big, scary world out there and we don't want our ladies' delicate sensibilities to be overwhelmed.MIKE LESTER ISN'T SEXIST! HE THINKS SOME WOMEN ARE ACTUALLY PEOPLE!
Thank you radical tumblr idiot.You're welcome?
Ironbite-what would we do without you?
What cartoons is Mike Lester famous for?Look him up, his stuff generally says:
What cartoons is Mike Lester famous for?Look him up, his stuff generally says:
"Women I dislike are all fat, ugly man-hating lesbians!"
"beanersillegals are gonna take yer jerbs."
"Black people who complain about inequality are actually racist!"
"Fags are gonna destroy America!"
"Torture is good because reasons!"
That is the point. Truth will melt the lies. This image is what Holocaust deniers believe.Yes, I was just saying they didn't even bother to draw it either.
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/vr5uno.jpg)
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
revisionism
noun re·vi·sion·ism \ri-ˈvi-zhə-ˌni-zəm\
: support of ideas and beliefs that differ from and try to change accepted ideas and beliefs especially in a way that is seen as wrong or dishonest
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/4qk61f.jpg)
And even then, Grave of the Fireflies isn't even anti-American. It's just an all around message of "this is why war fucking sucks."
And even then, Grave of the Fireflies isn't even anti-American. It's just an all around message of "this is why war fucking sucks."
Depending on who you ask, that could easily be construed as being anti-American.
You know, I like to think that showing why the horrors of war should not be gloryfied is a universal thing... but then I remember that one of America's biggest hero is a psychopath who bragged about killing hundreds of people just because they had brown skin and the government told him to do it.
And even then, Grave of the Fireflies isn't even anti-American. It's just an all around message of "this is why war fucking sucks."
Depending on who you ask, that could easily be construed as being anti-American.
The internet keeps showing me that US citizens have a really fragile ego. Naturally every criticism of USA is seen as an attack that must be avenged. Often not by defending from the claim or disproving it. No, the usual answer is to make a hostile comment about the other person's country. But that isn't enough, even when no one means any ill will or hasn't insulted USA there are americans who look for reasons to be outraged.
Last week there was this one history discussion and when civil wars were mentioned someone started ranting that the US civil war was the most important civil war in the history and that is why every country in the world teaches about it during history lessons. When quite reasonably this was countered by saying that the French revolution and the Russian revolution were in fact more important and had global effects by giving birth to new politics (Modern democracy and communism gaining their first foot holds with those civil wars.) this caused a massive outrage with people complaining that Europeans were just butthurt and acting Anti-American because it is fashionable. Seriously, the only notable thing about the US civil war is that it was fought to preserve slavery as an institution at a time when most modern nations had given up on it. And we are taught about other civil wars and wars as well. I'm sure that the schools in USA talk about Pancho Villa and the civil war in Mexico don't they? I mean, knowing the history of your region and notable things on Earth is why history lessons exist.
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image40.jpg)
Is it just me, or does the guy in the middle look like Borat?
Think you got worst mixed up with best.I didn't.
That still doesn't make it WPC material though.The message of the cartoon is that only crazy people are afraid around cops. I'd say that belongs in WPC.
Ironbite-try harder next time.
That's how I read it too.That still doesn't make it WPC material though.The message of the cartoon is that only crazy people are afraid around cops. I'd say that belongs in WPC.
Ironbite-try harder next time.
Or, and here's a more balanced interpretation, even the crazy peoe are afraid of the cops and the good cops are tired of being fearedYes, I like this interpretation.
Ironbite- a good cartoon
And it just wouldn't ever be distributed by the Cagle syndicate if it was a wingnut, unreasonable cartoon.
1. While I agree the cartoon is flawed in portraying the Martin and Zimmerman camps as being equally bad (I found the Zimmerman camp to be worse, if only because it seemed to attract so many wingnuts), it nevertheless calls for dialogue and understanding, which I find to be admirable. Furthermore, we don't know exactly what happened. If you want my perspective, I think Zimmerman was the one at fault, because of his violent track record.
1. While I agree the cartoon is flawed in portraying the Martin and Zimmerman camps as being equally bad (I found the Zimmerman camp to be worse, if only because it seemed to attract so many wingnuts), it nevertheless calls for dialogue and understanding, which I find to be admirable. Furthermore, we don't know exactly what happened. If you want my perspective, I think Zimmerman was the one at fault, because of his violent track record.1.1: My only real issue with this is that it's less of a "lack of mutual dialogue" issue and more a "Black are desperately trying to get people to listen to them" issue
2. It's not 1965 anymore. While we're not at the mountaintop yet, African-Americans have made incredible strides. Just twenty years ago, the idea of a black president was almost inconceivable. Institutionalized racism still exists, there's no doubt about that, but things have changed for the better, and I think they'll continue to do so.
3. In my humble opinion, Affirmative Action is worthy of criticism. But I don't think so because of misapplied quotes. Rather, I think the degree to which race-based Affirmative Action (at least for African-Americans) is still necessary ought to be examined. Nothing is above being questioned or criticized.
1. While I agree the cartoon is flawed in portraying the Martin and Zimmerman camps as being equally bad (I found the Zimmerman camp to be worse, if only because it seemed to attract so many wingnuts), it nevertheless calls for dialogue and understanding, which I find to be admirable. Furthermore, we don't know exactly what happened. If you want my perspective, I think Zimmerman was the one at fault, because of his violent track record.1.1: My only real issue with this is that it's less of a "lack of mutual dialogue" issue and more a "Black are desperately trying to get people to listen to them" issue
2. It's not 1965 anymore. While we're not at the mountaintop yet, African-Americans have made incredible strides. Just twenty years ago, the idea of a black president was almost inconceivable. Institutionalized racism still exists, there's no doubt about that, but things have changed for the better, and I think they'll continue to do so.
3. In my humble opinion, Affirmative Action is worthy of criticism. But I don't think so because of misapplied quotes. Rather, I think the degree to which race-based Affirmative Action (at least for African-Americans) is still necessary ought to be examined. Nothing is above being questioned or criticized.
2.1: i wouldn't call the "incredible strides" more like decent ones. Cops and vigilante still kill them at an alarming rate, poverty is still widespread, voting rights for them are getting taken away faster and faster, and they still face stereotyping and discrimination.
3. Race based affirmative action is still totally necessary. Blacks still face a shitton of poverty and discrimination.
(https://40.media.tumblr.com/658d16f420d889fd9997317223ad3431/tumblr_nnjppo2hkT1rr5t33o1_540.jpg)
I know its racist and plays on stereotypes and all that, but I cant help it, I genuinely found this one funny.Agreed. Offensive, but funny is still funny.
I shouldn't be so surprised to see right-wingers politicizing the riots, basically saying that they wouldn't have happened if a Republican was in charge. Because I'm sure the party with a long history of supporting and being supported by racists can be trusted to actually fix the causes of the riots.I'm sure the cartoonist is upset that they're were still some black people who were alive in the city.
I know its racist and plays on stereotypes and all that, but I cant help it, I genuinely found this one funny.Agreed. Offensive, but funny is still funny.
Not that I would agree with the implications the comic makes.
I know its racist and plays on stereotypes and all that, but I cant help it, I genuinely found this one funny.Agreed. Offensive, but funny is still funny.
Not that I would agree with the implications the comic makes.
I'm kind of in the same note....the falling pants, silly cartoony grins & drawing style is so goofy that it's hard to get angry.
I know its racist and plays on stereotypes and all that, but I cant help it, I genuinely found this one funny.Agreed. Offensive, but funny is still funny.
Not that I would agree with the implications the comic makes.
I'm kind of in the same note....the falling pants, silly cartoony grins & drawing style is so goofy that it's hard to get angry.
Especially considering that several of the looters in the cartoon look white for some reason. Um, guys, if you're going to make a joke about the saggy pants and the belts, the time to be racially sensitive has passed.
Especially considering that several of the looters in the cartoon look white for some reason. Um, guys, if you're going to make a joke about the saggy pants and the belts, the time to be racially sensitive has passed.
Neither is eating fried chicken.Especially considering that several of the looters in the cartoon look white for some reason. Um, guys, if you're going to make a joke about the saggy pants and the belts, the time to be racially sensitive has passed.
I'm pretty sure that the "saggy pants" clothing style isn't limited to a single ethnic group.
Or kool-aid.Neither is eating fried chicken.Especially considering that several of the looters in the cartoon look white for some reason. Um, guys, if you're going to make a joke about the saggy pants and the belts, the time to be racially sensitive has passed.
I'm pretty sure that the "saggy pants" clothing style isn't limited to a single ethnic group.
Or kool-aid.Neither is eating fried chicken.Especially considering that several of the looters in the cartoon look white for some reason. Um, guys, if you're going to make a joke about the saggy pants and the belts, the time to be racially sensitive has passed.
I'm pretty sure that the "saggy pants" clothing style isn't limited to a single ethnic group.
Or kool-aid.Neither is eating fried chicken.Especially considering that several of the looters in the cartoon look white for some reason. Um, guys, if you're going to make a joke about the saggy pants and the belts, the time to be racially sensitive has passed.
I'm pretty sure that the "saggy pants" clothing style isn't limited to a single ethnic group.
Wait, Kool-Aid is stereotypically black? I thought that was grape soda.
(http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image26.jpg)
I know where you can stick it, Mr. Mann.
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/d4d148b0928c9ad5d393085bc4e3648c/tumblr_nnop0fmGi11rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/d4d148b0928c9ad5d393085bc4e3648c/tumblr_nnop0fmGi11rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
Why, exactly, is this so bad?
Also, I haven't seen anyone saying ALL cops are abusive. Just that those who are aren't being stopped by those who aren't.
Okay, first, it doesn't matter what people say about cops. Cops aren't an enthnic group or nationality, their a fucking line of emoloyment. Saying that cops suck is no different than saying lawyers are greedy or politician are corrupt. As far as I'm concerned if a group that has been bullied by cops for the past 150 years is going to hate cops that's fine. Secondly, wow, an officer who was caught on tape shooting a fleeing unarmed man and planting evidence afterwards now faces the possibility of getting some sort of punishment. THE SYSTEM WORKS!!!Also, I haven't seen anyone saying ALL cops are abusive. Just that those who are aren't being stopped by those who aren't.
They are in some places.Charleston, for instance. Michael Slager was fired, and he's been charged with murder.
Okay, first, it doesn't matter what people say about cops. Cops aren't an enthnic group or nationality, their a fucking line of emoloyment. Saying that cops suck is no different than saying lawyers are greedy or politician are corrupt.Also, I haven't seen anyone saying ALL cops are abusive. Just that those who are aren't being stopped by those who aren't.
They are in some places.Charleston, for instance. Michael Slager was fired, and he's been charged with murder.
As far as I'm concerned if a group that has been bullied by cops for the past 150 years is going to hate cops that's fine.
Secondly, wow, an officer who was caught on tape shooting a fleeing unarmed man and planting evidence afterwards now faces the possibility of getting some sort of punishment. THE SYSTEM WORKS!!!
...wow, an uppity thug who was caught on tape shooting a cop in cold blood now faces the possibility of getting some sort of punishment. THE SYSTEM WORKS!!!
And the reason that cartoon is bullshit is because
1. I have never seen any black guy on the news ever say cops are bad, like, ever.
2. The reason it's bullshit is because it's pushing the crap about how the misunderstandings and prejudices blacks have about white are just as harmfull as the ones white people have about blacks.
White people cant act like we have any seriouse grievances towards black people, but black people
have been brutally oppressed by the white establishment for 400+ years.
1.what?Okay, first, it doesn't matter what people say about cops. Cops aren't an enthnic group or nationality, their a fucking line of emoloyment. Saying that cops suck is no different than saying lawyers are greedy or politician are corrupt.Also, I haven't seen anyone saying ALL cops are abusive. Just that those who are aren't being stopped by those who aren't.
They are in some places.Charleston, for instance. Michael Slager was fired, and he's been charged with murder.
I'd like you to remember that the next time somebody criticizes civil rights activists.As far as I'm concerned if a group that has been bullied by cops for the past 150 years is going to hate cops that's fine.
No, it isn't. All it does is create a vicious cycle of animosity. Fact is, African-Americans have every right to be angry at the police, but this is a problem that can only be solved through actual dialogue and cooperation. I know that we should beware of false equivalences and the middle ground fallacy, but taking it for granted that the responsibility for fixing the problem rests entirely on one party's shoulders ain't any better.
Furthermore, calling people monsters accomplishes nothing, which is something I've touched on before.Secondly, wow, an officer who was caught on tape shooting a fleeing unarmed man and planting evidence afterwards now faces the possibility of getting some sort of punishment. THE SYSTEM WORKS!!!
He's already been punished! He was fucking fired! And he's going on trial! What, would you rather he get lynched by an angry mob?
In fact, let's change that around:Quote...wow, an uppity thug who was caught on tape shooting a cop in cold blood now faces the possibility of getting some sort of punishment. THE SYSTEM WORKS!!!
You see?And the reason that cartoon is bullshit is because
1. I have never seen any black guy on the news ever say cops are bad, like, ever.
Not in so many words, no. But "dog-whistle terms" have never been unique to the establishment.2. The reason it's bullshit is because it's pushing the crap about how the misunderstandings and prejudices blacks have about white are just as harmfull as the ones white people have about blacks.
Tell that to Colin Ferguson's victims. Or white Zimbabweans. Or the people massacred in Haiti.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1804_Haiti_massacre (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1804_Haiti_massacre)
They may not be "just as harmful", at least in the U.S., but they're still harmful. You can calculate privilege all you want, but at the end of the day, they're still dead because of racism.White people cant act like we have any seriouse grievances towards black people, but black people
have been brutally oppressed by the white establishment for 400+ years.
Jews have been oppressed for millennia, but that doesn't stop people from calling a Jew out when he/she says something less than stellar.
Here is an old one:"Those negroes need to stop using violence to solve their problems!"
(https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*RQs1Gvz59ERExNWrY663EA.png)
Here is an old one:
(https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*RQs1Gvz59ERExNWrY663EA.png)
Here is an old one:
(https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*RQs1Gvz59ERExNWrY663EA.png)
What planet was the cartoonist living on?
Here is an old one:
(https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*RQs1Gvz59ERExNWrY663EA.png)
What planet was the cartoonist living on?
[pill picture snipped]
Wut?
How many birds are actually killed by wind turbines?
Wind turbines kill around 300,000 birds annually, house cats around 3,000,000,000
QuoteWind turbines kill around 300,000 birds annually, house cats around 3,000,000,000
(http://i.imgur.com/eEkxWpG.jpg)
http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html (http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html)
Actually, that Europe conquered the world makes a kind of twisted sense. Yeah, they were at constant war with eachother, but war doesn't lead to technological stagnation, it does the exact opposite. Because of the constant fighting, each state had to do everything in its power to stay one step ahead of its rivals and that means more soldiers, better armour, and better weapons. Warfare breeds better weapons like an open wound breeds bacteria.
Lots of money doesn't necessarily breed lots of good weapons or lots of good soldiers. It might lead to scientific gains, but scientific gains don't always directly translate to an increase in military power. If I remember my pre-modern world history correctly, the Asian countries were, mostly, far too insular and xenophobic to bother conquering other areas, instead focusing their efforts largely on the home front, as well as importing and exporting goods. While everyone else was busy building stable, wealthy empires, Europe was building armies of well-trained, battle-hardened soldiers with the full brunt of several generations' worth of war tech development at their disposal. When you look for conquerors, you look for warriors.
*Snip*
Wut?
Oh he's not a newbie. He's an asshole.
Oh he's not a newbie. He's an asshole.
Meh, I prefer to go by postcount as opposed to join date. Actual interaction with the community matters more to me than how long you've been here.
QuoteWind turbines kill around 300,000 birds annually, house cats around 3,000,000,000
(http://i.imgur.com/eEkxWpG.jpg)
http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html (http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html)
No offense, but that's a small wildcat, not a house cat.....
http://bigcatswildcats.com/pallas-cat/
.....but it IS acat & I'm sure it's nommed on plenty of birds.
QuoteWind turbines kill around 300,000 birds annually, house cats around 3,000,000,000
(http://i.imgur.com/eEkxWpG.jpg)
http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html (http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html)
No offense, but that's a small wildcat, not a house cat.....
http://bigcatswildcats.com/pallas-cat/
.....but it IS acat & I'm sure it's nommed on plenty of birds.
No offense taken, as it was treehugger.com who chose that photo for comedic effect, not me.
QuoteWind turbines kill around 300,000 birds annually, house cats around 3,000,000,000
(http://i.imgur.com/eEkxWpG.jpg)
http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html (http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html)
QuoteWind turbines kill around 300,000 birds annually, house cats around 3,000,000,000
(http://i.imgur.com/eEkxWpG.jpg)
http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html (http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/north-america-wind-turbines-kill-around-300000-birds-annually-house-cats-around-3000000000.html)
Clearly the solution is to kill all cats.
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/ce396a5c186e37cafe33bd266e393523/tumblr_nnma5pdEq61rr5t33o1_1280.gif)
And to think, Ramirez wasted all that time with the pen and ink.
Apologies if this has been posted before an i missed it.
It's such a dumb argument I can't' believe they are still using it
(https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1920164_693277554065710_1721742512_n.jpg?oh=b5c372d91883fad091d436217f314b13&oe=55C5031F)
Simple answer: Because Social Security is the name of a particular funding program, with fixed methods of obtaining Social Security funding, and "welfare" is a generalized blanket term for a wide variety of programs, each with their own methods of funding, and all varying.
I've got to the website owned by this "Zesko" person. Here's what he has to say.
"People accuse me of being mean-spirited, and I AM mean-spirited when it comes to certain issues."
So, he's at least somewhat self-aware. That's impressive for a wingnut.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-uvmR9UcAAV0do.jpg)
1. Stopping using the holocaust as a comparison for everything
2. That doesn't make any sense, Isis is a loosely organized non government orginization, the nazis were a well organized organization that systematically murdered.
3.FFS,if you wanted to draw a comparison between the current situation and a genocide just chose the Armenian genocide, that actually targeted Christian predominately!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-uvmR9UcAAV0do.jpg)
Yeah, wouldn't have made more sense to give the ISIl guy an AK and the German a Mauser rifle/mp40?(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-uvmR9UcAAV0do.jpg)
Guy in Balaclava's kitchen knife=Baron Von X-en's Luger, don'tcha you know.
(http://i.4cdn.org/d/1432550839487.jpg)
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/93fd785886b705207a2e0b7484b920cc/tumblr_npfm9yZX5n1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
This looks like a Kelly cartoon
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/9/98/Jewsoven.jpg)
Is Wyatt really this incapable of being self-aware? This reads like 19-year old edgelord.
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/9/98/Jewsoven.jpg)
Is Wyatt really this incapable of being self-aware? This reads like 19-year old edgelord.
I'd LOVE to stuff the CARTOONIST in an oven!
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/9/98/Jewsoven.jpg)
Is Wyatt really this incapable of being self-aware? This reads like 19-year old edgelord.
I'd LOVE to stuff the CARTOONIST in an oven!
Along with anybody who unironically likes his work.
i loll'd. reminds me of the joke: what's the difference between a jew and a meatloaf? none, they both go in the oven at 220°c for an hour.
i approve of this joke, if my participation in the "bad jokes" thread is any indication.i loll'd. reminds me of the joke: what's the difference between a jew and a meatloaf? none, they both go in the oven at 220°c for an hour.
Have a little bit of consideration for others, my grandfather died in Auschwitz...
...he got drunk on duty and fell out of the guard tower.
(http://oi61.tinypic.com/2mqrrrt.jpg)
Because trannies are freaks, amirite?
I actually see the Hubble cartoon as a damning indictment of society and a pretty good cartoon. The Hubble has been revealing the mysteries and beauty of the universe for the world to see but we're more interested in this sort of thing. If that is the intent of the cartoon the perhaps better choice of things for Bubba Ballcap to want to see would have been a better view of Kim K's ass, but then again, she is not the hot topic of the moment and Jenner is.
I can't really count it as a "best" cartoon when it calls her Bruce rather than Caitlyn. Unless it's from before her choosing her name?Except that guy is supposed to be a moron. That has already been established by the fact that he's ignoring the Hubble telescope and all the wonders of the galaxy and focusing on celebrity gossip. Making him misname Caitlyn is just there to make sure that the reader understands that we are not supposed to sympathize with him.
...what? Surely I'm missing something here, right? There's no way that this can be serious.I'll start listing off bad things about this:
(http://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/16e5218/2147483647/thumbnail/766x511%3E/quality/85/?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2F7e%2Fe88e92de7ba053251ee3b0279399ad%2F856-145)
(http://oi62.tinypic.com/2sahvft.jpg)
You see, if you grow a garden, then that garden was intelligently designed. Therefore nature does not exist.
4. The crossed M means that he has been playing games that aren't meant for kids. As if hinted by the GTA comment.
5. I dunno. Maybe it's racism or maybe he just wanted to put some diversity into his comics... But it does seem suspicious that the only black kid is a thug...
(http://41.media.tumblr.com/44eb1c1e6dafd2fafb9a1a57ef962196/tumblr_nq9ubuA2y41r8kiyko1_1280.jpg)
It's repeating the Fox News nonsense that the Charleston shooter wasn't racially motivated and that it was really an attack on Christians.
While it might be repeating FOX news's angle. I dont really see it as being a bad cartoon.
Regardless of the motivations of the shooter, the people who died were without a doubt christian. Hence the thought that the victims would be welcomed into heaven would be seen as a comforting image especially to the survivors.
I dunno, it comes off more positive than negative for me.
Cartoon from Greece's Golden Dawn faction? Basically a Greek version of an A. Wyatt Mann POS?
Certain bigots have accused Jews of deliberately not giving the Holodomor (as well as other genocides) enough attention in the media (as they supposedly run it) in order to focus solely on the Holocaust. This didn't exactly come out of nowhere: Stalin had stacked the NKVD with Jews (consisting of over 30% of the force at its highest) to create a convenient scapegoat during the Great Purge, and, inadvertently, it seems to have been a factor as to why so many Ukrainians were later joining the SS in World War II.
This also overlooks the fact that unlike the Holodomor, the Holocaust had the benefit of the occupation of the Allies who made sure to scrupulously document, photograph, and film as much of it as they could, as well as put as many perpetrators as they could find on trial (thus creating a lot more information to study). Plus, the Holodomor took place in Iron Curtain-esque secrecy (like Chernobyl) and it was nearly completely impossible for the West see the true enormity of what was happening because of it. But who needs things like logic when you can just blame the Jews for everything?
Cartoon from Greece's Golden Dawn faction? Basically a Greek version of an A. Wyatt Mann POS?
I think that's Cyrillic, not the Greek alphabet.
Anyway, I have no idea what it's saying, but the black and Jewish stereotypes don't fill me with hope.
I'm not sure if NKVD had that many jews at some point but I do know that Stalin ended up killing a lot of jews in his death camps during his regime. He was no fan of jews and his purges hit them just like they hit everyone else. Anyway, Holodomor was horrible and killed a lot of people, not unlike the Great leap forwards it did this by intentional starvation and systematic disregard of human life rather than straight up gathering people and executing them.
Cartoon from Greece's Golden Dawn faction? Basically a Greek version of an A. Wyatt Mann POS?
I think that's Cyrillic, not the Greek alphabet.
Anyway, I have no idea what it's saying, but the black and Jewish stereotypes don't fill me with hope.
I wonder if the "Blacks" are supposed to be "Arabs"? They have the same stupid beak noses as Jewish stereotype guy.
Stereotypical "Black" caricatures usually have round fat noses & huge lips that make them look more like anthropomorphized apes than people.
The Jewish "Fat Cat" has bigger lips than the dark-skinned guys in this cartoon.
The cartoonist stinks on a technical lever. Couldn't be bothered to add some basic shading to the White family. Looks like a bunch of dark-skinned Mid-Eastern guys attacking a colorless cardboard cut-out of a cartoon "white family".
Quotewho needs things like logic when you can just blame the Jews for everything?
Is it me or does the word "Holdomor" sound like something out of Lord of the Rings?
Like a sister-city to Mordor, or something....
Not making light of a horrible atrocity....just a weird thought.
Is it me or does the word "Holdomor" sound like something out of Lord of the Rings?
Like a sister-city to Mordor, or something....
Not making light of a horrible atrocity....just a weird thought.
A holographic Mordor? Its okay, I have the same thought every time I see it, too.
Also, Lenin was a Jew?
(http://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/leninv.jpg)
Seems legit.
Random aside: but am I the only one that thinks Lenin pulled off the whole balding thing really well? Most balding dudes, to me, look kinda...well, bad, but its hard to imagine Lenin without him being mostly bald.
Is he like 14 or something in that image he looks way too...young for a teen.
[Note: I am not putting Winston Churchill in the same boat as Josef "Kill Ukrainians" Stalin, Strom "Blacks are Icky" Thurmond or Adolf "Kill Jews" Hitler.]
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
(http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f226/SpukiKitty/All%20My%20PICS%20for%20Web%20Forums/young%20stalin_zps5zcv6bye.png) (http://s48.photobucket.com/user/SpukiKitty/media/All%20My%20PICS%20for%20Web%20Forums/young%20stalin_zps5zcv6bye.png.html)
Future oppressive Soviet psychopath.
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1950.
[Note: I am not putting Winston Churchill in the same boat as Josef "Kill Ukrainians" Stalin, Strom "Blacks are Icky" Thurmond or Adolf "Kill Jews" Hitler.]
Winston Churchill was a warmongering racist who is the beneficiary of one of the biggest whitewashing jobs in history. Being credited with beating Hitler will make people forget all the stupid shit you believed and did.
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1950.
He was, and then he left office shortly after Queen Elizabeth II was crowned. I think it was more voters kicking out Labour than electing the Conservatives that made him Prime Minister after that election.
And, as I noted, he was not only a warmonger, he was also a raging racist: look at Bengal in 1943, or his attitude toward Mohandas Gandhi.
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1950.
He was, and then he left office shortly after Queen Elizabeth II was crowned. I think it was more voters kicking out Labour than electing the Conservatives that made him Prime Minister after that election.
And, as I noted, he was not only a warmonger, he was also a raging racist: look at Bengal in 1943, or his attitude toward Mohandas Gandhi.
Yeah, Churchill knew war. He was exactly the right leader for a Britain already embroiled in a war. Thing was, war was really all he knew. He was pretty broken up about Neville Chamberlain's premature death because he had thought to have Chamberlain keep the UK running while he focused on the war efforts. In the 1945 general election, he said that Labour's plans would require a Gestapo to implement, which illustrated pretty starkly the difference between Churchill the war leader and Churchill the peacetime politician.Bengal is essentially the butt monkey of the region.
But, y'know, beating Hitler will make you the last non-royal to have been offered a dukedom. (Technically, Prince Philip was offered his dukedom before he became a royal, but he was created Duke of Edinburgh on the day he married Princess Elizabeth.)
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1950.
He was, and then he left office shortly after Queen Elizabeth II was crowned. I think it was more voters kicking out Labour than electing the Conservatives that made him Prime Minister after that election.
And, as I noted, he was not only a warmonger, he was also a raging racist: look at Bengal in 1943, or his attitude toward Mohandas Gandhi.
Knowing what we know now about Gandhi, Churchill might have been a little bit ahead of the curve there.
Racist, sexist, mysognisitic and oh yeah, pedophile
Ironbite-Ghandi wasn't exactly all prayer circles and hunger strikes.
One person that was built-up as awesomesauce but turned out to be a whole lotta nothing was Mother Teresa.....
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa
One person that was built-up as awesomesauce but turned out to be a whole lotta nothing was Mother Teresa.....
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/15hy2d0.jpg)
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1950.
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1951.
Check that - Labor won, the system is just silly.
Nazism destroyed Germany!
Yeaaaaaaah...the crazy motherfucker was rearing and ready to go to war with Stalin before Hitler's corpse had even cooled off. Ya know, after large swaths of the developed world (and large swaths of undeveloped places, as well) had been bombed to shit and Britain could barely find two adjacent buildings that hadn't been turned to rubble? Churchill was, as dpareja pointed out, a warmongering psychopath. Hell, that's one of the reasons he was all but thrown out of office: he was just too fucking blood-hungry.
On the other hand, he was re-elected in 1950.
Check that - Labor won, the system is just silly.
Nazism destroyed Germany!
I really, really hate to have to defend Nazism in any context, but... no, no it didn't. In fact, Nazism got Germany out of the Great Depression early. If anything, it created a relative boom in the thirties in that nation. What destroyed Germany was, plain and simple, World War II and Hitler's expansionism. And no, that's not inherent to Nazism.
Now, don't get me wrong. Nazism is a horrible ideology and anyone who willingly supports it is misguided at best and malevolent at worst. But let's not blame it for everything in Germany.
Step one: Kill the Jews.
Step two-twelve: Keep killing the Jews
Step one: Kill the Jews.
Step two-twelve: Keep killing the Jews
Step thirteen: ?
Step fourteen: Profit!
Step one: Kill the Jews.
Step two-twelve: Keep killing the Jews
Step thirteen: ?
Step fourteen: Profit!
There is no mystery to that plan.
Step thirteen: Loot the Jew gold.
...
Step fifteen: Cover up what happened.
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/29c6rsn.jpg)
He's got the Democratic & Republican colors wrong
He's got the Democratic & Republican colors wrong
Not really. Those colours are pretty recent, only being associated with the parties since the 2000 election. The electoral map from that election was displayed so often that blue became associated with the Democratic Party and red with the Republican Party in the public consciousness. (Very funny when you consider that the people most rabidly anti-Communist are also Republicans.) Prior to that the networks assigned the two colours at random for each election.
He's got the Democratic & Republican colors wrong
Not really. Those colours are pretty recent, only being associated with the parties since the 2000 election. The electoral map from that election was displayed so often that blue became associated with the Democratic Party and red with the Republican Party in the public consciousness. (Very funny when you consider that the people most rabidly anti-Communist are also Republicans.) Prior to that the networks assigned the two colours at random for each election.
True. Also, I knew that. I'm just wondering why the cartoonist didn't get the memo.
He's got the Democratic & Republican colors wrong
Not really. Those colours are pretty recent, only being associated with the parties since the 2000 election. The electoral map from that election was displayed so often that blue became associated with the Democratic Party and red with the Republican Party in the public consciousness. (Very funny when you consider that the people most rabidly anti-Communist are also Republicans.) Prior to that the networks assigned the two colours at random for each election.
True. Also, I knew that. I'm just wondering why the cartoonist didn't get the memo.
Maybe the cartoonist is making the point that the two parties are basically the same.
He's got the Democratic & Republican colors wrong
Not really. Those colours are pretty recent, only being associated with the parties since the 2000 election. The electoral map from that election was displayed so often that blue became associated with the Democratic Party and red with the Republican Party in the public consciousness. (Very funny when you consider that the people most rabidly anti-Communist are also Republicans.) Prior to that the networks assigned the two colours at random for each election.
True. Also, I knew that. I'm just wondering why the cartoonist didn't get the memo.
Maybe the cartoonist is making the point that the two parties are basically the same.
I guess "They're both the same & run by Snidely Whipstein". It was pretty obvious on the surface, anyway.
Now, about that mask one. Isn't anyone going to comment on the hilarity of the cartoonist's case of Hentai-based Critical Research Failure?
He's got the Democratic & Republican colors wrong
Not really. Those colours are pretty recent, only being associated with the parties since the 2000 election. The electoral map from that election was displayed so often that blue became associated with the Democratic Party and red with the Republican Party in the public consciousness. (Very funny when you consider that the people most rabidly anti-Communist are also Republicans.) Prior to that the networks assigned the two colours at random for each election.
True. Also, I knew that. I'm just wondering why the cartoonist didn't get the memo.
Maybe the cartoonist is making the point that the two parties are basically the same.
I guess "They're both the same & run by Snidely Whipstein". It was pretty obvious on the surface, anyway.
Now, about that mask one. Isn't anyone going to comment on the hilarity of the cartoonist's case of Hentai-based Critical Research Failure?
It really is quite funny, when you think about it. How the hell did he manage to make that mistake?
(http://i.imgur.com/8TWr2Aj.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/4SKxJxd.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/37k9AnL.gif)
Who wants to play spot the double standard?
(http://assets.amuniversal.com/8991b200061b0133f220005056a9545d)
(http://oi59.tinypic.com/24e2xsg.jpg)How is that genocide? The number of white poeple will remain the same.
To them whites not being dominant is genocide despite that not fitting any definition of genocide I've ever seen, but White Genocide advocates have never been a smart bunch since they seem to equate being anti-racist with anti-white (seriously I could probably write a sixty page long paper on how fucking wrong those idiots are but I don't want to dignify them.)My Favourite response was "Why are you afraid of white becoming a minority? Are minorities treated as second class citizens of something?
We could add the Klan, the Lord's Resistance Army, the Aryan Nation, or any of the other Christian terrorist groups to the cartoon. For that matter, if we really tried, we could probably go for a terrorist organization from just about any religion.
We could add the Klan, the Lord's Resistance Army, the Aryan Nation, or any of the other Christian terrorist groups to the cartoon. For that matter, if we really tried, we could probably go for a terrorist organization from just about any religion.
Yeah. We've seen Buddhist terrorists, Jewish terrorists, Hindu terrorists, and even atheist terrorists.
(http://oi60.tinypic.com/no6ej4.jpg)What?
Allow me to translate: "Here we see the Jew in his natural state. Planning to make the Christians and the Muslims fight each other. WAKE UP SHEEPLE THEY ARE USING YOU! WE MUST CEASE THIS SENSELESS STRUGGLE AND UNITE IN OUR MUTUAL HATRED OF THE JEWS!"(http://oi60.tinypic.com/no6ej4.jpg)What?
In the mind of a moron, if a husband cheats on his wife, then it is due to the wife being either unwilling or unable to satisfy her husband's, ahem, "needs." Basically, "if she can't satisfy her husband, how can she satisfy AMERICA?!"
They're still harping on that non-issue that is Benghazi eh?Well, they are outraged that people still don't seem to care that she killed all those American soldiers. (Honestly, I was surprised but I have chatted with someone who believed in the BENGHAZIGATE thingy 100% just today.)
Ironbite-yawn.
They're still harping on that non-issue that is Benghazi eh?
Ironbite-yawn.
I... think this goes here.They're calling President Obama a Marxist. More specifically, Obama's using a cardiac defibrillator on Marx's corps, bringing him back to life.
(https://36.media.tumblr.com/cb448297c0f326c36310bf030f7d1f67/tumblr_nssrp7GiFy1qhvndno1_540.jpg)
.....what.
ok so they faked the shootinga) At that point wouldn't it be better if the two people just pretended to die? Why kill them for real if the shooting wasn't real?
...and got two people to allow themselves to be killed to further the illusion
...and got all their family members to go along with it
...and the corroners
...and the police
...and the numerous witnesses that were right there
...and even got the gunman to kill himself to not let on how no one really got shot
wouldn't it have been easier to just really shoot two people on tv?
OR if you really want to make sure you can push your "guns are evil" cause without getting caught there is even easier way:You're assuming that the shootouts are real. The whole point of these conspiracy theories is that there are no crazy people shooting up theaters every couple weeks. They're being faked in an attempt to make guns look more dangerous than they really are.
1) Premake all the needed speeches and related media stuff for the next massive shootout in USA.
2) Wait for a week or two until the next massive shootout in USA happens.
(http://www.claybennett.com/images/archivetoons/wage_gap.jpg)So women still get less money than men?
Yeah, about the "wage gap":
http://www.bls.gov/cps/earnings.htm (http://www.bls.gov/cps/earnings.htm)
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/15/politifact-sheet-gender-pay-gap/ (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/15/politifact-sheet-gender-pay-gap/)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/04/09/president-obamas-persistent-77-cent-claim-on-the-wage-gap-gets-a-new-pinocchio-rating/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/04/09/president-obamas-persistent-77-cent-claim-on-the-wage-gap-gets-a-new-pinocchio-rating/)
(http://www.claybennett.com/images/archivetoons/wage_gap.jpg)So women still get less money than men?
Yeah, about the "wage gap":
http://www.bls.gov/cps/earnings.htm (http://www.bls.gov/cps/earnings.htm)
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/15/politifact-sheet-gender-pay-gap/ (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/15/politifact-sheet-gender-pay-gap/)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/04/09/president-obamas-persistent-77-cent-claim-on-the-wage-gap-gets-a-new-pinocchio-rating/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/04/09/president-obamas-persistent-77-cent-claim-on-the-wage-gap-gets-a-new-pinocchio-rating/)
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/ec265fbb3173b67e95446fe5b6b4a7cf/tumblr_ns5o5qOxyV1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/ec265fbb3173b67e95446fe5b6b4a7cf/tumblr_ns5o5qOxyV1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
What do I want you to do? I want you to stop trying to whitewash your history.
In the history of any society, there will be things that you can be proud of and things that you should be ashamed of. Don't pretend that the bad things didn't happen, or worse, rewrite the narrative so that slavery and genocide, some of the worst atrocities that one group of humans has ever inflicted upon another, somehow become a point of pride. You don't have to be "ashamed of your heritage," but you must acknowledge that your ancestors and their neighbors did some shitty things. Recognize that you, personally, benefit from many of these things; while other people, especially minorities and the poor, still suffer as a direct consequence of them. Finally, and this is the important part, stop blocking attempts to rectify this injustice.
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/ec265fbb3173b67e95446fe5b6b4a7cf/tumblr_ns5o5qOxyV1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
What do I want you to do? I want you to stop trying to whitewash your history.
In the history of any society, there will be things that you can be proud of and things that you should be ashamed of. Don't pretend that the bad things didn't happen, or worse, rewrite the narrative so that slavery and genocide, some of the worst atrocities that one group of humans has ever inflicted upon another, somehow become a point of pride. You don't have to be "ashamed of your heritage," but you must acknowledge that your ancestors and their neighbors did some shitty things. Recognize that you, personally, benefit from many of these things; while other people, especially minorities and the poor, still suffer as a direct consequence of them. Finally, and this is the important part, stop blocking attempts to rectify this injustice.
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/35btf03.jpg)
The holocaust didn't actually kick off until after the US entered WWII, so heading back for a quick visit wouldn't exactly be an option.
That said, anyone who heads back to Nazi Germany*, even before 1939, is most certainly a fool.
*: Nazi Germany being the German state after 1933 and before 1946.
Well, holocaust denial implications aside, that is indeed correct. Someone who's lived in America since 1932 and claims to be a holocaust survivor is almost certainly full of shit.That Jews name? Albert Einstein.
That said, anyone who heads back to Nazi Germany*, even before 1939, is most certainly a fool.
*: Nazi Germany being the German state after 1933 and before 1946.
She's not necessarily German. For all we know, she could be Czech, or Polish, or French.
You people realize the story is blatant BS, right?
Not to make light of what happened to the people who were stuck in Europe during the war but does seeing the writing on the wall and getting the fuck outta dodge count as surviving the holocaust?I'd say that counts as avoiding the holocaust.
Could you put thy under a spoiler thing? I really don't want to see this cartoonists scat fetish.
How about you go ahead and spoiler that post...please.
Oh, yeah. Putrid Sex Object. A friend told me about it and I had the bright idea to watch it when hanging out at an other friend's place recovering from our night out. Hangover and... that... didn't mix well with her and she wasn't able to finish watching it after she realized how far the film was going to go. I actually didn't believe that things would be taken as far as she thought but I was proven wrong immediately.
A few years ago I checked the artist's site again out of pure curiosity and found out that he had started selling the video instead of just having it available for free. I guess that's a big reason why I haven't heard about it for years.
(http://i.imgur.com/aQota6q.jpg?1)
(http://i.imgur.com/nwAot5U.jpg)
(http://36.media.tumblr.com/5be575f6be2ef67a76c2ad3da042e1b3/tumblr_nusad5dFs71r54qfqo1_1280.jpg)
Just for the record: Barbarella's post crashed my phone when I tried to read this thread. There was just too much stuff and the phone shut down.
Just for the record: Barbarella's post crashed my phone when I tried to read this thread. There was just too much stuff and the phone shut down.
It is, it's trying to make a false equivalency.(http://36.media.tumblr.com/5be575f6be2ef67a76c2ad3da042e1b3/tumblr_nusad5dFs71r54qfqo1_1280.jpg)
If anything, it seems to be insulting both.
Sanders looking nuts and Trump saying something nuts.
I really hate cartoons that try to pull this shit, it's a lazy way for the artist to feel smarter because he's "moderate" and thus smarter.
I really hate cartoons that try to pull this shit, it's a lazy way for the artist to feel smarter because he's "moderate" and thus smarter.
Just for context: the artist, Gary Varvel, is anything but a moderate--he's spewed right-wing drivel on the editorial pages of the Indianapolis Star for decades. He may have no love for Trump, but it's probably more from Varvel being an "establishment" sort. I do think he's trying to make Trump and Sanders both look crazy, but for completely different reasons--he probably opposes Sanders on principle, while Trump is more "This guy is making us look like the bigoted assholes we are and ruining our chances to take the White House next year!"
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/2vknnnt.jpg)
Keep dreaming, buddy.
And even if the Solutrean hypothesis is true, there a numerous explanations other than genocide. Maybe it was some kind of cataclysm or disease. Maybe they couldn't adapt to certain changes. Maybe they evolved or got absorbed by another culture.You forgot that willfully having children with another race is also genocide.
(http://oi57.tinypic.com/2vknnnt.jpg)
Keep dreaming, buddy.
I mean, it's not even controversial that Native Americans came here from Asia. The only difference the Solutrean hypothesis would make would be showing there were earlier European settlers, but the current let's-call-them-White people in America are not descended from them. Any hypothetical Solutrean descendents would not look European, what with having spent 20,000 years in reproductive isolation; indeed, if they had survived, I expect the 15th century Europeans rediscovering them would have thought of them as a different race. Much like, say, they didn't think Native Americans and Asians were the same race.
Of course this underlies the stupidity of treating people as though "where they are from originally" is a meaningful question. We're all from the same goddamn place if you look back far enough.
The proper response to the white man in that cartoon:What? Are you assuming that just because they are a ginger they are Irish? THAT'S RACIST!
"Go back to Ireland!"
The proper response to the white man in that cartoon:What? Are you assuming that just because they are a ginger they are Irish? THAT'S RACIST!
"Go back to Ireland!"
...Besides, it's more likely that they have Scottish blood and that kind of ignorant and hateful behavior is typical of the barbaric Scots.
/hypocrite
(http://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a7b2Wd2_700b.jpg)
(click to show/hide)
Shoes without buckles? Wherewith wouldst thou find such goodly footwear?
WHY IS THIS SLAVE NOT IN SHACKLES!?(click to show/hide)
Shoes without buckles? Wherewith wouldst thou find such goodly footwear?
Men's Wearhouse. Quoth the prophet George Zimmer, "You're gonna like the way you look, I guarantee it."
WHY IS THIS SLAVE NOT IN SHACKLES!?(click to show/hide)
Shoes without buckles? Wherewith wouldst thou find such goodly footwear?
Men's Wearhouse. Quoth the prophet George Zimmer, "You're gonna like the way you look, I guarantee it."
In the background Bush is pointing out the old man to Kennedy and asking "Who's that weird fella?
(http://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/avLRyx5_460s.jpg)
I love the 9gag logo and the "le stem master race" jerking.(http://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/avLRyx5_460s.jpg)
...I get the dyed hair, but why does signing up for gender studies give them glasses too? Is it just that it magically turns women into clones of Rebecca Watson* or what?
*who does not have a gender studies degree!
Not political, but really awful
(http://i.imgur.com/OLEscRb.jpg)
What? You mean I'm not better than everyone because my degree actually means something? Damn.
(http://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/avLRyx5_460s.jpg)
...I get the dyed hair, but why does signing up for gender studies give them glasses too? Is it just that it magically turns women into clones of Rebecca Watson* or what?
*who does not have a gender studies degree!
Don't you know? A Gender Studies degree turns you into a poor-quality drawing of Daria Morgandorffer.
Don't you know? A Gender Studies degree turns you into a poor-quality drawing of Daria Morgandorffer.
Except for the wrong hair color, wrong outfit, and wrong personality. Is it the birth control glasses?
WHY IS THIS SLAVE NOT IN SHACKLES!?(click to show/hide)
Shoes without buckles? Wherewith wouldst thou find such goodly footwear?
Men's Wearhouse. Quoth the prophet George Zimmer, "You're gonna like the way you look, I guarantee it."
In the background Bush is pointing out the old man to Kennedy and asking "Who's that weird fella?
Not as entertaining as the fact that FDR no longer has polio in it.
The Solutrean Theory was based on marked similarities in form and knapping technique in very old spear heads found in New England and Virginia. Geneticists could not, however, find a meaningful connection between haploid groups in modern Native Americans and Anatolians (descendants of Solutreans).
If a small band or even a long term, gradual migration of Solutreans had walked and kayak-ed across the last Ice Age's pack ice via Iceland and Greenland to North America, then a small remnant of the genes should have shown up in the gene pool here. The theory was intriguing, but it turned out that the spear head similarities were a good example of "form follows function".
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/9fd58be57af11ebdaa567fe472a309ac/tumblr_nv931hIPSe1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
why don't those hypocrites in BLM talk about the persecution of indigenous peoples in Paraguay? Don't they know they need to fix literally every problem ever?
(Also, nice giant fucking Purple lips Garry "Dogwistle" Mcoy.)
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/9fd58be57af11ebdaa567fe472a309ac/tumblr_nv931hIPSe1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
why don't those hypocrites in BLM talk about the persecution of indigenous peoples in Paraguay? Don't they know they need to fix literally every problem ever?
(Also, nice giant fucking Purple lips Garry "Dogwistle" Mcoy.)
(Also, nice giant fucking Purple lips Garry "Dogwistle" Mcoy.)
(Also, nice giant fucking Purple lips Garry "Dogwistle" Mcoy.)
Dumb question: what do the giant purple lips mean?
Also, since when have trolls reacted like that?
anders beiring breivik... kinda made the rounds, what? three years ago?
Breivik's massacre was a huge thing in Europe but I can see why the average Yankee wouldn't have heard about it. The shooter was a white christian and the victims were socialists (it was a meeting of young socialists) and since you can't blame the shooting on black people or Muslims American media probably didn't want to talk about it as much.
Breivik's massacre was a huge thing in Europe but I can see why the average Yankee wouldn't have heard about it. The shooter was a white christian and the victims were socialists (it was a meeting of young socialists) and since you can't blame the shooting on black people or Muslims American media probably didn't want to talk about it as much.
I'll second UP in firmly stating that the Anders Breivik massacre was in fact very prominent in the news here.
That's basically why it was so shocking. That someone in Northern Europe could go on a rampage the likes of which you usually see in Chicago's south side is why it captured our attention span.
Ironbite-then I think Kim Kardashian did something and it was gone again.
That's basically why it was so shocking. That someone in Northern Europe could go on a rampage the likes of which you usually see in Chicago's south side is why it captured our attention span.
Ironbite-then I think Kim Kardashian did something and it was gone again.
Scandinavians going on killing rampages is nothing new. But they tend to use axes, not guns.
That's basically why it was so shocking. That someone in Northern Europe could go on a rampage the likes of which you usually see in Chicago's south side is why it captured our attention span.
Ironbite-then I think Kim Kardashian did something and it was gone again.
Scandinavians going on killing rampages is nothing new. But they tend to use axes, not guns.
or fire, or knives. and don't get me started on the norwegian black metal scene. either they're pants on head crazy, or sociopathic, or neo-nazis, or murderers, or dead, or all of the above.
Viking with guns; at once a terrifying idea, and an awesome one.
Viking with guns; at once a terrifying idea, and an awesome one.You mean the Swedish Navy?
Viking with guns; at once a terrifying idea, and an awesome one.
Viking with guns; at once a terrifying idea, and an awesome one.
(http://i.imgur.com/nJ0Bgf7.jpg)
Viking with guns; at once a terrifying idea, and an awesome one.
(http://i.imgur.com/nJ0Bgf7.jpg)
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/v/t1.0-9/12108216_1005412169500094_8344604134671232338_n.jpg?oh=949a9c73d731c8f4594519193a546fee&oe=5693FEEB)
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/12118972_688993624534411_3032583125541488277_n.jpg?oh=61d2efbd74440d2a8abbfd7439133e08&oe=5688A170)
....holy FUCK, what century are those vile racists living in?
WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY WANT A BILL?!
USA get your shit together!
WHY is the cartoonist putting those words in the mouth of the personification of USA? They specifically chose a symbolic figure to give that speech but I don't see the point in doing so.
If it was being said by some random kid (or that starfish from SpongeBob sguarepants) then it would at least be funny.
And I still don't get how getting an ID in USA can be so difficult. I mean I totally get the point of asking for an ID if you are going to vote but seeing as it apparently is a massive hurdle to voters I kinda get confused. Then I remember that everything is expensive and the only things that are easy to get in USA are guns.
WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY WANT A BILL?!
USA get your shit together!
The other more pervasive way to disenfranchise voters is the judicial system; you lose your right to vote when convicted of a felony, such as possession of a small amount of pot or cocaine in their various forms.
It just occurred to me that because of malnutrition prostate cancer would actually be more likely to affect the poor and hungry.
The other more pervasive way to disenfranchise voters is the judicial system; you lose your right to vote when convicted of a felony, such as possession of a small amount of pot or cocaine in their various forms.
Has this ever been challenged in the courts? It's always seemed really barbaric to me.
The other more pervasive way to disenfranchise voters is the judicial system; you lose your right to vote when convicted of a felony, such as possession of a small amount of pot or cocaine in their various forms.
Has this ever been challenged in the courts? It's always seemed really barbaric to me.
No one would take the case lest they be tarred forever for being "soft on crime." Welcome to America, the best-developed third world country on the planet.
The other more pervasive way to disenfranchise voters is the judicial system; you lose your right to vote when convicted of a felony, such as possession of a small amount of pot or cocaine in their various forms.
Has this ever been challenged in the courts? It's always seemed really barbaric to me.
No one would take the case lest they be tarred forever for being "soft on crime." Welcome to America, the best-developed third world country on the planet.
No disrespect, but I think you're confused. While it is true that some state judges are elected, voter disenfranchisement raises a federal question under the Constitution, thus entitling the case to be heard in federal courts. Federal judges are appointed for life, though can be removed by a sitting president, IIRC, or by an act of Congress. So, for the most part, federal courts would have no problem hearing the case for the given reason of being "soft on crime."
Nor would lawyers have problem arguing the case. While some like to demonize the noble profession, there are several civil rights organizations that would litigate the case in a heartbeat, and more than enough lawyers to do so. Additionally, since this is a violation of a civil right, it falls under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The only significance of the statute being that if the court finds for the plaintiff, the state owes reasonable attorney's fees, calculated by the Lodestar method at hours worked on the case times about $250 and hour (sometimes as high as $700). Long story short, there's money in them there hills.
And without looking it up, I'd be surprised if felon disenfranchisement hasn't been ruled on at some point by the Supreme Court, seeing all the things I've just said.
Also, I thought federal judges had to be outright impeached by Congress to be removed.
(http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv5/Nickiecole/bsblm_zpsz50yvm48.jpg)It's the /pol/ (4chans nazi board) edit.
Really going for the gold standard when it comes to right wing bs, aren't they??
What's wrong with GMOs and Kosher Salt? *deliberately misses point*(http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv5/Nickiecole/bsblm_zpsz50yvm48.jpg)It's the /pol/ (4chans nazi board) edit.
Really going for the gold standard when it comes to right wing bs, aren't they??
The bill thing is allegedly to establish which legislative district (Congress, state, county and city representative and councilman districts) the voter resides in on voting day. Many poor people live in apartments and even small houses where the landlords hold the utility accounts and include it in rent, since many poor people have bad credit and can't afford the large security deposits necessary to start a utility account of their own. If the impoverished voter has no other regular bill, say for a credit card, and has no bank account statement - again, something not everyone can get if they have bounced checks in the past - they can be SOL'ed out of their right to vote. The reason it is bullshit is because when you Register to vote, you fill out and sign forms providing the required information to the polling officials, and they send your voter ID card to you after they have verified you are who you say you are. The cards typically are simple with no photo, but they are the law of the land. Legislation adding further requirements at the polling places add a hurdle that is at best in a Constitutional grey area, especially if requiring more than a common second ID, such as a state driver license or state photo ID (which you get at the driver license bureaus).
The other more pervasive way to disenfranchise voters is the judicial system; you lose your right to vote when convicted of a felony, such as possession of a small amount of pot or cocaine in their various forms.
The bill thing is allegedly to establish which legislative district (Congress, state, county and city representative and councilman districts) the voter resides in on voting day. Many poor people live in apartments and even small houses where the landlords hold the utility accounts and include it in rent, since many poor people have bad credit and can't afford the large security deposits necessary to start a utility account of their own. If the impoverished voter has no other regular bill, say for a credit card, and has no bank account statement - again, something not everyone can get if they have bounced checks in the past - they can be SOL'ed out of their right to vote. The reason it is bullshit is because when you Register to vote, you fill out and sign forms providing the required information to the polling officials, and they send your voter ID card to you after they have verified you are who you say you are. The cards typically are simple with no photo, but they are the law of the land. Legislation adding further requirements at the polling places add a hurdle that is at best in a Constitutional grey area, especially if requiring more than a common second ID, such as a state driver license or state photo ID (which you get at the driver license bureaus).
The other more pervasive way to disenfranchise voters is the judicial system; you lose your right to vote when convicted of a felony, such as possession of a small amount of pot or cocaine in their various forms.
Yeah, that's bullshit. In our case using a bill is in lieu of having a registration card and a second piece of I.D. if memory serves me correctly. Having said that, if you are actually registered but simply didn't receive your card in the mail a single piece of government issued I.D. with a photo and address is all you need. I found this out first hand during the last election; a quick phone call by my wife confirmed that I was still registered and just needed to show up at the polling station with one suitable piece of I.D. No drama, just typical Canadian politeness and apologies all around.
I never understood the felons can't vote thing. I thought that being released supposedly meant that you had served your debt to society and were now a member of it again. Part of that membership includes the right to vote.
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/12193675_502399873274352_969352527601318581_n.jpg?oh=1338739a4fa3d9b9029a9a4591a92872&oe=56B41D9D)
I don't.... wholly disagree with this one, but considering who Milo actually is, this is definitely Worst.
"safe spaces"
like how much of a shitty cartoon villain do you have to be to be against the concept of safe spaces
what the shit does "pearl clutchers" even mean in this context
and "gaytriarchy"
that's
damn
Who the hell is Milo?
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/12193675_502399873274352_969352527601318581_n.jpg?oh=1338739a4fa3d9b9029a9a4591a92872&oe=56B41D9D)
I don't.... wholly disagree with this one, but considering who Milo actually is, this is definitely Worst.
Gonna disagree with you on this. Milo's kind of an asshole, true, but at least he's honest and competent. Which is more than I can say about a lot of other journalists...
A journalist for Breitbart. He can be kind of a douche sometimes, but at least he does his job properly.
*munches popcorn*
Ironbite-wonder if someone will point out something about UP's good friend Milo.
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/12193675_502399873274352_969352527601318581_n.jpg?oh=1338739a4fa3d9b9029a9a4591a92872&oe=56B41D9D)
I don't.... wholly disagree with this one, but considering who Milo actually is, this is definitely Worst.
Gonna disagree with you on this. Milo's kind of an asshole, true, but at least he's honest and competent. Which is more than I can say about a lot of other journalists...
A journalist for Breitbart. He can be kind of a douche sometimes, but at least he does his job properly.
Seriously? Milo is egomaniacal narcissist and neoreactionary misogynist who has only does what he does because he hates "the Left." That's typical for Breitbart, of course.
*munches popcorn*
Ironbite-wonder if someone will point out something about UP's good friend Milo.
It's hard talking about Milo Yiannopoulos without mentioning [the thing that Sigma won't let us talk about except in a thread where any activity is seen as a sign of endorsement of the movement, and consequently we hope it stays dead].
He writes for Breitbart and he thinks female brains don't have an aptitude for science. That should say it all, really.
*munches popcorn*
Ironbite-wonder if someone will point out something about UP's good friend Milo.
It's hard talking about Milo Yiannopoulos without mentioning [the thing that Sigma won't let us talk about except in a thread where any activity is seen as a sign of endorsement of the movement, and consequently we hope it stays dead].
He writes for Breitbart and he thinks female brains don't have an aptitude for science. That should say it all, really.
*munches popcorn*
Ironbite-wonder if someone will point out something about UP's good friend Milo.
It's hard talking about Milo Yiannopoulos without mentioning [the thing that Sigma won't let us talk about except in a thread where any activity is seen as a sign of endorsement of the movement, and consequently we hope it stays dead].
He writes for Breitbart and he thinks female brains don't have an aptitude for science. That should say it all, really.
Don't forget about his attack on Black Lives Matter activist Shaun King.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/20/1413881/-Race-love-hate-and-me-A-distinctly-American-story (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/20/1413881/-Race-love-hate-and-me-A-distinctly-American-story)
Or his pearl-clutching over Thor being female in one of the new comics. (A Salon article from February has the details, I can't link to it because the title has a reference to the above mentioned thing that we're not allowed to talk about)
Yeah, how dare people not want to dignify racism, misogyny and other dehumanizing with a platform."safe spaces"
like how much of a shitty cartoon villain do you have to be to be against the concept of safe spaces
The problem is that these days, "safe space" is synonymous with an echo chamber where nobody is allowed to voice a dissenting opinion, especially if it contradicts a woman or a minority.
Quote from: UPYeah, how dare people not want to dignify racism, misogyny and other dehumanizing with a platform."safe spaces"
like how much of a shitty cartoon villain do you have to be to be against the concept of safe spaces
The problem is that these days, "safe space" is synonymous with an echo chamber where nobody is allowed to voice a dissenting opinion, especially if it contradicts a woman or a minority.
2. Trying to "no platform" hate speech just makes it seem like the bigots have a point.
Clicking on Ultie's link, I only have one thing to ask: when did the supposed number of women who will be raped in their lifetime go up to 1 in 3?
I still can't open any of Ultimate Paragons links. What is that "Archive" thingy supposed to be?
I still can't open any of Ultimate Paragons links. What is that "Archive" thingy supposed to be?
Just take a look at this shit:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151102202120/http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/30/1303118/-Dear-Men-STFU (https://web.archive.org/web/20151102202120/http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/30/1303118/-Dear-Men-STFU)
I still can't open any of Ultimate Paragons links. What is that "Archive" thingy supposed to be?
Quote from: UPYeah, how dare people not want to dignify racism, misogyny and other dehumanizing with a platform."safe spaces"
like how much of a shitty cartoon villain do you have to be to be against the concept of safe spaces
The problem is that these days, "safe space" is synonymous with an echo chamber where nobody is allowed to voice a dissenting opinion, especially if it contradicts a woman or a minority.
There are two major things wrong with that:
1. Their definition of "bigotry" is absurdly broad.
2. Trying to "no platform" hate speech just makes it seem like the bigots have a point.
Quote from: UPYeah, how dare people not want to dignify racism, misogyny and other dehumanizing with a platform."safe spaces"
like how much of a shitty cartoon villain do you have to be to be against the concept of safe spaces
The problem is that these days, "safe space" is synonymous with an echo chamber where nobody is allowed to voice a dissenting opinion, especially if it contradicts a woman or a minority.
There are two major things wrong with that:
1. Their definition of "bigotry" is absurdly broad.
2. Trying to "no platform" hate speech just makes it seem like the bigots have a point.
So can you explain why these people can't have safe places? Who you choose to invite into your home and what you choose to talk about are your business and not anyone else. Unless they are insisting the world at large play by their rules I fail to see why you can't just let them sit in their little corner of the sandbox and ignore them while you're building your sandcastle.
The "egomaniacal narcissist" bit I get, but "neoreactionary misogynist" just seems like ad hominem.
*Totally respectful, not-disparaging-at-all "Citation needed" image macro*
2. Trying to "no platform" hate speech just makes it seem like the bigots have a point.
The "egomaniacal narcissist" bit I get, but "neoreactionary misogynist" just seems like ad hominem.
... how is an insulting (though accurate) description of Yiannopoulos' character LESS of an ad hominem argument than an accurate (though arguably insulting) description of his gender politics?
*Totally respectful, not-disparaging-at-all "Citation needed" image macro*
(http://thehill.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/blogs/google_021114screenshot.jpg?itok=JCWUtAse)
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/15/heres-why-there-ought-to-be-a-cap-on-women-studying-science-and-maths/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/sorry-girls-but-the-smartest-people-in-the-world-are-all-men/ (FSTDT-approved! (http://"http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=113389"))
And because the man is a gift that keeps giving:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/26/does-feminism-make-women-ugly/
UP, I've called you out several times already on your complete lack of self-awareness. Since there's no point in trying to appeal to your nonexistent self-reflective capabilities, I guess I'll have to step out of my comfort zones and be more... specific in my criticism.
You have repeatedly argued that some people, namely those that are politically on your left, should be more mindful about the bad apples on their side. That they should always stand ready to denounce, loudly and publicly, any group or individual that display reverse bigotry, "anti-free-speech" tendencies, or anything that you would call "extremism" or "fanaticism"... no matter how insignificant the person or insular the group, and how petty, exaggerated or just plain silly your actual grievance.
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
Some are anonymous Internet users, but you certainly seem to have a thing for drama-whoring "public figures" like Yiannopoulos
or Hoff Summers.
You aren't just failing to condemn them for their bile-spewing bullshit while putting up with them in your crusades against social justice. You actively and specifically promote their vicious points of view in your arguments against "the other side", because all is fair when trying to make people realize how evil and dangerous the enemy is.
This isn't a standard failure to live up to one's own standards. You are living proof that the Dunning-Kruger effect can be applied to moral judgements, and that a certain Jewish preacher actually had a point when he was speaking about motes and beams in people's eyes.
If this sounds condescending and disrespectful, that's because it is. Again, I wish I didn't have to state it outright.
Quote2. Trying to "no platform" hate speech just makes it seem like the bigots have a point.
Citation needed, because that is a wide-reaching, unsubstantiated claim that cannot be confirmed or refuted after a quick Google search.
To be quite honest, I strongly doubt that you actually want every kind of hate speech to receive a public platform, only those specific patterns that your tribe is commonly associated with and accused of.
Sure, you do not want to outright criminalize the brands of hate speech that offend you. You just want those to be marginalized out of the public discourse.
Here's a thought: maybe, just maybe,somemost of the people you routinely accuse of advocating censorship against opinions they don't like, are in fact "merely" trying to push for these opinions to be marginalized. Which could lead you to wonder about the nature, origins, present connotations and general meaningfulness of the term "political correctness"... but probably won't.
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
I don't "endorse" them. It's a marriage of convenience.
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
I don't "endorse" them. It's a marriage of convenience.
It's nice to see all the bigots team up for one cause (one "gate", if you will) so they can die on one hill.
Yeah, this is about what I expected. Popcorn, anyone? beer? Game of Hearthstone?
I'm with Cerim, this shit's getting old. JUST FUCK, ALREADY.
I'm with Cerim, this shit's getting old. JUST FUCK, ALREADY.
Want some ambiance? Would you prefer George Michael or Barry White?
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
I don't "endorse" them. It's a marriage of convenience.
It's nice to see all the bigots team up for one cause (one "gate", if you will) so they can die on one hill.
That's rich coming from somebody who deliberately misgendered a transwoman. And yes, I'm going to bring that up every time you try to call somebody else a bigot on shaky grounds.
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
I don't "endorse" them. It's a marriage of convenience.
It's nice to see all the bigots team up for one cause (one "gate", if you will) so they can die on one hill.
That's rich coming from somebody who deliberately misgendered a transwoman. And yes, I'm going to bring that up every time you try to call somebody else a bigot on shaky grounds.
When you voluntarily associate with horrible people like Milo and Sommers, don't act so surprised when we question your motives -- especially when any criticism of said horrible people triggers your tribalistic defense mechanism.
Reflexively yelling, "You too!" won't get you out of the corner you've painted yourself into.
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
I don't "endorse" them. It's a marriage of convenience.
It's nice to see all the bigots team up for one cause (one "gate", if you will) so they can die on one hill.
That's rich coming from somebody who deliberately misgendered a transwoman. And yes, I'm going to bring that up every time you try to call somebody else a bigot on shaky grounds.
When you voluntarily associate with horrible people like Milo and Sommers, don't act so surprised when we question your motives -- especially when any criticism of said horrible people triggers your tribalistic defense mechanism.
"Horrible people?" How, exactly, are they worse than the rape apologists, serial harassers, domestic abusers, and child pornographers you'll find among their enemies?
And "tribalism?" That's rich, considering you're a socialist who defends crony capitalism because of identity politics.
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly chosen to endorse some absolutely terrible people because they happened to share some of your pet peeves.
I don't "endorse" them. It's a marriage of convenience.
It's nice to see all the bigots team up for one cause (one "gate", if you will) so they can die on one hill.
That's rich coming from somebody who deliberately misgendered a transwoman. And yes, I'm going to bring that up every time you try to call somebody else a bigot on shaky grounds.
When you voluntarily associate with horrible people like Milo and Sommers, don't act so surprised when we question your motives -- especially when any criticism of said horrible people triggers your tribalistic defense mechanism.
"Horrible people?" How, exactly, are they worse than the rape apologists, serial harassers, domestic abusers, and child pornographers you'll find among their enemies?
And "tribalism?" That's rich, considering you're a socialist who defends crony capitalism because of identity politics.
How can he be both a socialist AND defend crony capitalism? The two are polar opposites.
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/1464763_628560987190144_1071819691_n.jpg?oh=c6e408827fdad2006d695a1eb9e2f5d4&oe=56B58518)
The persecution complex is strong with this one.
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/1464763_628560987190144_1071819691_n.jpg?oh=c6e408827fdad2006d695a1eb9e2f5d4&oe=56B58518)Kids have barely come down from their Halloween sugar highs and there's no snow on the ground yet. I say expel the little fucker.
The persecution complex is strong with this one.
It's headphones.I hope he doesn't expect to actually hear his music.
Maybe he isn't listening at the moment? Kinda like how some people put their sunglasses on top of their head when they aren't using them.It's headphones.I hope he doesn't expect to actually hear his music.
Maybe he isn't listening at the moment? Kinda like how some people put their sunglasses on top of their head when they aren't using them.
Have I ever been fun?Maybe he isn't listening at the moment? Kinda like how some people put their sunglasses on top of their head when they aren't using them.
You're no fun anymore.
Have I ever been fun?Maybe he isn't listening at the moment? Kinda like how some people put their sunglasses on top of their head when they aren't using them.
You're no fun anymore.
And I believe the cartoonist is under the impression that all gender-leftists (for lack of a better term) are a hive mind and therefore all these people with their different stances are self-contradictory or something.
Wow, it's almost like "SJW" covers enough ideological groups so as to be completely meaningless as a descriptor or something.
And I believe the cartoonist is under the impression that all gender-leftists (for lack of a better term) are a hive mind and therefore all these people with their different stances are self-contradictory or something.
And I believe the cartoonist is under the impression that all gender-leftists (for lack of a better term) are a hive mind and therefore all these people with their different stances are self-contradictory or something.
Indeed. When actually there are ridiculously bloody feuds between people over these sort of different conceptions of gender (e.g. TERFs vs trans people).
...you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
...you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
Nah. At least, not in my mind. In my mind, you're "Tumblr Transgender" if you use words like "genderpunk", "juxera", or "orbself". Not just being agender.
I think "orbself" might be in reference to nounself pronouns that have something to do with someone's nonsensical gender identity. Like if someone said "my gender is an orb", they might also want people to use orb/orbs/orbself pronouns when referring to them. ("Orb took orbs imaginary friend to the store and got a candy bar for orbself.") That's what popped into my head at least, and yes I know I should get out more....you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
Nah. At least, not in my mind. In my mind, you're "Tumblr Transgender" if you use words like "genderpunk", "juxera", or "orbself". Not just being agender.
... what. genderpunk sounds like a sexologist's pen and paper rpg. juxera sounds like a basque apéritif, and orbself? i'm drawing a blank. i can haz dumbed down definition, plz?
...you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
Nah. At least, not in my mind. In my mind, you're "Tumblr Transgender" if you use words like "genderpunk", "juxera", or "orbself". Not just being agender.
... what. genderpunk sounds like a sexologist's pen and paper rpg. juxera sounds like a basque apéritif, and orbself? i'm drawing a blank. i can haz dumbed down definition, plz?
...you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
Nah. At least, not in my mind. In my mind, you're "Tumblr Transgender" if you use words like "genderpunk", "juxera", or "orbself". Not just being agender.
... what. genderpunk sounds like a sexologist's pen and paper rpg. juxera sounds like a basque apéritif, and orbself? i'm drawing a blank. i can haz dumbed down definition, plz?
Basically what Ghoti said. A reference to nounself pronouns, yes. My favorite is juxera, though. Supposedly, it's "a gender like a girl, but on another plane of existence". That's the definition.
...you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
Nah. At least, not in my mind. In my mind, you're "Tumblr Transgender" if you use words like "genderpunk", "juxera", or "orbself". Not just being agender.
...you do know I'm a tumblr transgender person, right?
Nah. At least, not in my mind. In my mind, you're "Tumblr Transgender" if you use words like "genderpunk", "juxera", or "orbself". Not just being agender.
That's... good, I guess. I mean, I'm not juxera or genderpunk and don't use particularly weird pronouns. (I prefer nonbinary to agender but honestly taking a hard stance on that sort of terminology is a pointless exercise, call it whatever you like)
I was going to make a longer post but my brain isn't in top shape right now and I don't want to start a pointless argument. So, um, I'm not comfortable throwing people who choose weirder gender terminology than me under the bus, will elaborate on request after I've had time to sleep.
And... pretty sure those countries ARE taking in Syrian refugees.Not those particular countries, no. The refugees are in the countries around Syria, but those richest countries aren't taking any. Besides not caring all that much they probably fear that the refugees would cause too instability in their countries and that would be dangerous for the autocratic rulers.
I assume that they are talking Spanish (or what the artist probably calls "Mexican") so that the readers know they are the "bad" kind of foreigners...
I don't really see the link between "helping build new mosques in Europe" and "spreading a fundamentalist Muslim sect", tbh.The Mosques need preachers and Saudis bring Muslims from all around the world to the school they have built for this purpose. Those preachers are then sent to the Mosques the Saudis have funded to spread the Salafi doctrine. This is not a conspiracy theory, it's something scholars, intelligence officials and many Muslims are well aware of. I don't know if you noticed the outrage and worry the Shia Muslims expressed when the news came that there will be a Saudi funded grand Mosque in Helsinki.
I assume that they are talking Spanish (or what the artist probably calls "Mexican") so that the readers know they are the "bad" kind of foreigners...
is that... marx? big non-sequitur.
is that... marx? big non-sequitur.
I got the impression that the comic is pro-Marxist.
The artist shows that communists have fought against Nazism for a long time and draws a parallel between Neo-Nazis and SJWs and demands that the workers of the world keep fighting these evils.
...Whether you think that SJW Tumblerites are as bad as Net-Neo-Nazis is another matter but the artist seems to think so.
Yeah, let's ignore the inconvenient fact that Marx was quite anti-Semitic himself.
Yeah, let's ignore the inconvenient fact that Marx was quite anti-Semitic himself.So he would agree with the Nazis on that issue. Admittedly, it's the issue that makes the Nazis despicable, but he would still disagree with their economic policies.
Yeah, let's ignore the inconvenient fact that Marx was quite anti-Semitic himself.So he would agree with the Nazis on that issue. Admittedly, it's the issue that makes the Nazis despicable, but he would still disagree with their economic policies.
Yeah, let's ignore the inconvenient fact that Marx was quite anti-Semitic himself.So he would agree with the Nazis on that issue. Admittedly, it's the issue that makes the Nazis despicable, but he would still disagree with their economic policies.
I don't think he exactly agreed with the Nazis on Judaism, either. His father was a Jew who converted to Lutheranism, as far as the Nazis are concerned Marx was a Jew too.
Yeah, let's ignore the inconvenient fact that Marx was quite anti-Semitic himself.So he would agree with the Nazis on that issue. Admittedly, it's the issue that makes the Nazis despicable, but he would still disagree with their economic policies.
(http://secotm.tumblr.com/image/134024141954)
(http://45.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbhzi4SOcg1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
(http://45.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbhzi4SOcg1rr5t33o1_500.gif)
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/134406210532)
(http://assets.amuniversal.com/988f34e011b60130fd9a001dd8b71c47)
(http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/image/134406210532)
(http://assets.amuniversal.com/988f34e011b60130fd9a001dd8b71c47)
Is a flat tax a good thing or not?
Is a flat tax a good thing or not?
A flat tax is a very bad thing. It assumes that having everyone pay the same percentage of their income is "fair" while ignoring the simple fact that the poor, like myself, spend a far higher percentage of their income on basic needs than the rich do.
I don't think I've seen a single feminist earnestly espouse the notion that regretting sex means you were raped.
I don't think I've seen a single feminist earnestly espouse the notion that regretting sex means you were raped.
if you look far enough back in the "worst" thread, you might see an example or two. keep in mind it's one of those radfem gurus that said it. i believe the quote went "even if the sex is consensual, it's still rape".
I don't think I've seen a single feminist earnestly espouse the notion that regretting sex means you were raped.
We used to talk about sexual politics, rather than sexual practice. But what the libertarians did when they borrowed US gay male culture was they focused obsessively on sexual practice, and they eroticised inequality, subordination, pain and dominance. We used to talk about: “why are women heterosexual?” And “what is lesbianism?” – because we didn’t like the definition it was given by the non-feminists that it was just about sex, that it was just something you were, that it was something you couldn’t help being, that it was something you were programmed to be and that it was less desirable than being straight.
So radical feminism saw heterosexuality under patriarchy as massively problematic, because it benefited men and it disadvantaged women. It meant that the family structure was one that had the man at the Head of the household – even if he wasn’t a dinosaur, even if he thought of himself as quite progressive. It meant that he did things to her, sexually. It meant that she would joke with her friends as early writers like Marilyn French outlined, that she would often put up and shut up, and let him get on with stuff. It meant that she wasn’t really wanting or enjoying, so that he would buy her a new washing machine if they were middle class, or if they were working class, so that he would give her his wages at the end of the week.
Because lets face it, we know we are right – we are learning all the time, and we change our minds on all kinds of strategic issue, but radical feminism is common sense. On the one hand you have got utter idiots like Laurie Penny who are simply coming out with the stuff that she does because she knows that the groups she is supporting, that are pro-trans, pro-sex work, and pro- other anti-women nonsense, are run by very high profile, powerful libertarian men. We know that she is doing it for a career move. But the vast majority of women that spout that kind of nonsense are doing so because they are scared of the feminism that means they have to name men as the problem, because they know the punishment they will get if they do.
I'm suprised no one here is talking about the fact the cartoonist doesn't think a sober person having sex with a drunk person is rape.
I'm suprised no one here is talking about the fact the cartoonist doesn't think a sober person having sex with a drunk person is rape.
(http://45.media.tumblr.com/576f1067ab07483d80af2fa65c7b44b0/tumblr_nyy41aKBWy1rr5t33o1_1280.gif)
(https://36.media.tumblr.com/5b85fd9ca828b4a0635f17756f779aff/tumblr_nzk074hJuP1rr5t33o1_500.jpg)Saying "God is great" doesn't make someone a terrorist regardless of what language they say it in, a good cartoon.
Allah Akbar of course means "kill whitey, support Isis, re-elect Obama"
Just kidding it means "God is great" how fucking stupid was this comics creator?
To be fair, if anybody of any religion started screaming "God is Great" near me I'd be a little concerned.
To be fair, if anybody of any religion started screaming "God is Great" near me I'd be a little concerned.
But they're not screaming it, they're texting it.
I know there's like six million people competing for the Republican nomination, but is any of them Jewish? (the Democrats have Sanders, of course).
What about Trump? He's well loved by the white supremacist crowd.I know there's like six million people competing for the Republican nomination, but is any of them Jewish? (the Democrats have Sanders, of course).
In the eyes of the person who made the cartoon, every one of them is.
What about Trump? He's well loved by the white supremacist crowd.I know there's like six million people competing for the Republican nomination, but is any of them Jewish? (the Democrats have Sanders, of course).
In the eyes of the person who made the cartoon, every one of them is.
I also love the implication that democracy is wrong in that comic. We might have a lil' fascist on our hands.
The US annexed the north pole? I really have been terrible at keeping up with the news...
Santa is Canadian. His postal code is H0H 0H0.Canada doesn't have the ACA. In fact, that means Santa doesn't have to give medical benefits at all, because Canada uses a single-payer system.
So, this guy is opposed to Communists who interpret the manifesto in a way that doesn't help anybody, and supports Communists who help the needy and try to build a better world.It's a straw man of anarchist/libertarian socialists created by ML Stalin apologists, how could I not put it here?
I guess the thing you didn't like is the craptastic art?
It should have ended with the guy on the right telling Mr. Mustache to eat his facial hair.
I don't quite get all the references but I interpreted this is "anti-SJW" rather than "anti-Communism/Socialism/etc." (Mustache is a douchey 'SJW' with a Stalin-stache while the guy on the right is the reasonable, 'SJ' one who 'gets it' and wants to help people). Is the reader supposed to root for Annoying Mustache?
Pabst Blue Ribbon is the hipster beer here, aye. From what I've heard, its low-quality pisswasser in the same vein as Budweiser and Busch, even by the admittedly low standards of beer, so the only people who drink it are either those who can't afford anything better or are enjoying it "ironically."
HA. Barb, you get points for the Mitchell reference. Easily one of my favourite MST3Ks.
Pabst Blue Ribbon is the hipster beer here, aye. From what I've heard, its low-quality pisswasser in the same vein as Budweiser and Busch, even by the admittedly low standards of beer, so the only people who drink it are either those who can't afford anything better or are enjoying it "ironically."
Man! I remember when Pabst was associated with gruff "Working Class Lout" stereotypes. I'm amazed it's still being made.
You'd think hipsters and artsy types would go after microbrews or something...but Pabst? :P
When I think Pabst Blue Ribbon, I think "Joe Don Baker IS...Mitchell!".
Pumaman and Space Mutiny wrre good.
Wine enemas. What.Google "brinking" if you dare.
(https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/1227_764342637026445_7133664907802698321_n.jpg?oh=153064792b957e320e6c2247f5c7b9e4&oe=5710BE35)
ITT: UP gets offended by good points.
ITT: UP gets offended by good points.
You know 61% of ethnic minorities think political correctness is a problem, right? At least, according to a survey by Fairleigh Dickinson University.
(http://i.imgur.com/KPVITLz.jpg)
My response to people who bitch about PC.
ITT: UP gets offended by good points.
You know 61% of ethnic minorities think political correctness is a problem, right? At least, according to a survey by Fairleigh Dickinson University.
I'm really not sure what that is meant to prove. Also I'm sorry about this but given your track record could you please provide a link to the survey?
(http://i.imgur.com/KPVITLz.jpg)
My response to people who bitch about PC.
(http://i.imgur.com/KPVITLz.jpg)
My response to people who bitch about PC.
There's a big ol' fallacy. The old "this problem doesn't matter because that problem is worse" nonsense. I can't for the life of me remember its Latin title, though.
(http://i.imgur.com/KPVITLz.jpg)
My response to people who bitch about PC.
There's a big ol' fallacy. The old "this problem doesn't matter because that problem is worse" nonsense. I can't for the life of me remember its Latin title, though.
ITT: UP gets offended by good points.
You know 61% of ethnic minorities think political correctness is a problem, right? At least, according to a survey by Fairleigh Dickinson University.
I'm really not sure what that is meant to prove. Also I'm sorry about this but given your track record could you please provide a link to the survey?
Here you go:
http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2015/151030/ (http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2015/151030/)
Is 1,026 people a big enough sample size?
(http://i.imgur.com/KPVITLz.jpg)
My response to people who bitch about PC.
There's a big ol' fallacy. The old "this problem doesn't matter because that problem is worse" nonsense. I can't for the life of me remember its Latin title, though.
In my opinion, this particular example is more like "this problem doesn't matter because it's only a problem if you deliberately go out of your way to be an asshole."
(http://i.imgur.com/KPVITLz.jpg)
My response to people who bitch about PC.
There's a big ol' fallacy. The old "this problem doesn't matter because that problem is worse" nonsense. I can't for the life of me remember its Latin title, though.
In my opinion, this particular example is more like "this problem doesn't matter because it's only a problem if you deliberately go out of your way to be an asshole."
I'm not sure what image you're looking at, but the one in this thread quite clearly states that violating social taboos in other places has worse consequences than doing so here, therefore political correctness doesn't matter. Either I missed something huge, or it says nothing whatsoever about people going out of their way to be assholes.
ITT: UP gets offended by good points.
You know 61% of ethnic minorities think political correctness is a problem, right? At least, according to a survey by Fairleigh Dickinson University.
I'm really not sure what that is meant to prove. Also I'm sorry about this but given your track record could you please provide a link to the survey?
Here you go:
http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2015/151030/ (http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2015/151030/)
Is 1,026 people a big enough sample size?
More importantly it has nothing to do with Ethnic Minorities, they are simply random US citizens. The 61% was of the entire poll response, not ethnic minorities. However even if that were correct, I am still at a loss as to what the point is?
No. It's not even a promille of the American population.
Seventy-two percent of whites and 61 percent of nonwhites (mostly African-American and Hispanic) describe political correctness as a big problem.
No. It's not even a promille of the American population.
Sorry, statistics pet peeve here, that's not how sample size works. The size of your sample proportional to the population you drew the sample from (in this case, the population of America) is meaningless*. The absolute size of the sample is all that matters. 1,026 would be just as useful a number if the population of America was a million or a billion (or infinite).
If you only accept studies with a sample size of one-thousandth of the population of America you're going to be rejecting the vast majority of them.
*well, meaningless given the approximations implicit in modelling things by normal distributions and so on. If your population was 1,027, that tells you something more, but then you'd be using an entirely different set of mathematical methods.
No. It's not even a promille of the American population.
Sorry, statistics pet peeve here, that's not how sample size works. The size of your sample proportional to the population you drew the sample from (in this case, the population of America) is meaningless*. The absolute size of the sample is all that matters. 1,026 would be just as useful a number if the population of America was a million or a billion (or infinite).
If you only accept studies with a sample size of one-thousandth of the population of America you're going to be rejecting the vast majority of them.
*well, meaningless given the approximations implicit in modelling things by normal distributions and so on. If your population was 1,027, that tells you something more, but then you'd be using an entirely different set of mathematical methods.
To me, that would only make sense if the small group's demographic had relevance to the study. Like, if a drug company asked 1000 users of its medicine if there are side effects and over half reported positive, then in that situation the small sample size wouldn't matter. But asking 1000 random yobbos in a nation of several hundred million about whether political correctness is an issue and then claiming that the entire nation has spoken on the issue... that's a hard buy.
Well, the article that linked to it (https://archive.is/3H5K0#selection-3467.220-3467.365) gave these figures:QuoteSeventy-two percent of whites and 61 percent of nonwhites (mostly African-American and Hispanic) describe political correctness as a big problem.
No. It's not even a promille of the American population.
Sorry, statistics pet peeve here, that's not how sample size works. The size of your sample proportional to the population you drew the sample from (in this case, the population of America) is meaningless*. The absolute size of the sample is all that matters. 1,026 would be just as useful a number if the population of America was a million or a billion (or infinite).
If you only accept studies with a sample size of one-thousandth of the population of America you're going to be rejecting the vast majority of them.
*well, meaningless given the approximations implicit in modelling things by normal distributions and so on. If your population was 1,027, that tells you something more, but then you'd be using an entirely different set of mathematical methods.
To me, that would only make sense if the small group's demographic had relevance to the study. Like, if a drug company asked 1000 users of its medicine if there are side effects and over half reported positive, then in that situation the small sample size wouldn't matter. But asking 1000 random yobbos in a nation of several hundred million about whether political correctness is an issue and then claiming that the entire nation has spoken on the issue... that's a hard buy.
And yet, as long as the sample is actually random, it works. I believe a sample size of as small as 50 people can actually represent any number just fine, as long as it's randomly chosen.
"Political correctness" = people actually getting called out for saying insulting and demeaning things about groups of people, particularly based on things they can't control such as gender, sexual orientation or country of birth. Hence, if you don't act like an asshole, you don't have any problems with PC.Those are solely your own thoughts. The image says absolutely nothing of the sort.
No. It's not even a promille of the American population.
Sorry, statistics pet peeve here, that's not how sample size works. The size of your sample proportional to the population you drew the sample from (in this case, the population of America) is meaningless*. The absolute size of the sample is all that matters. 1,026 would be just as useful a number if the population of America was a million or a billion (or infinite).
If you only accept studies with a sample size of one-thousandth of the population of America you're going to be rejecting the vast majority of them.
*well, meaningless given the approximations implicit in modelling things by normal distributions and so on. If your population was 1,027, that tells you something more, but then you'd be using an entirely different set of mathematical methods.
To me, that would only make sense if the small group's demographic had relevance to the study. Like, if a drug company asked 1000 users of its medicine if there are side effects and over half reported positive, then in that situation the small sample size wouldn't matter. But asking 1000 random yobbos in a nation of several hundred million about whether political correctness is an issue and then claiming that the entire nation has spoken on the issue... that's a hard buy.
I'll be honest, some of that flew straight over my head. Like you said, I'd need to have studied the field. I don't have the framework that you do, and pursuing this further would make me feel hopelessly out of my depth. I don't like feeling stupid, so maybe it's best that we end this here. I hope you understand.
Final statement on my part: I concede that taking 1 000 people at random would be a relatively more accurate method of gauging trends within a 300 000 000+ population than selecting 1 000 people based on some unifying factor. However, despite the possible ignorance of the position, I still maintain that measuring the will of a 300 000 000+ population by the demographics of a survey of 1 000 is wildly inaccurate. Also, flipping the same coin N times isn't really analogous to peering into the opinions of several individual people because the object being measured is fundamentally different.
I'll be honest, some of that flew straight over my head. Like you said, I'd need to have studied the field. I don't have the framework that you do, and pursuing this further would make me feel hopelessly out of my depth. I don't like feeling stupid, so maybe it's best that we end this here. I hope you understand.
Final statement on my part: I concede that taking 1 000 people at random would be a relatively more accurate method of gauging trends within a 300 000 000+ population than selecting 1 000 people based on some unifying factor. However, despite the possible ignorance of the position, I still maintain that measuring the will of a 300 000 000+ population by the demographics of a survey of 1 000 is wildly inaccurate. Also, flipping the same coin N times isn't really analogous to peering into the opinions of several individual people because the object being measured is fundamentally different.
POPULATION SIZE DOESN'T MATTER
The variability of a statistic from a random sample does not depend on the size of the population, as long as the population is at least 100 times larger than the sample.
Why does the size of the population have little influence on the behavior of statistics of random samples? To see why this is plausible, imagine sampling harvested corn by thrusting a scoop into a lot of corn kernels. The scoop doesn't know whether it is surrounded by a bag of corn or an entire truckload. As long as the corn is well mixed (so that the scoop selects a random sample), the variability of the result depends only on the size of the scoop.
"Political correctness" = people actually getting called out for saying insulting and demeaning things about groups of people, particularly based on things they can't control such as gender, sexual orientation or country of birth. Hence, if you don't act like an asshole, you don't have any problems with PC.Those are solely your own thoughts. The image says absolutely nothing of the sort.
My actual point when I made that picture is that, just as it says, there have always been social mores and taboos, but anti-PC hysterics try to make out as if not being able to spout off whatever you want whenever you want without consequence is some new and terrifying thing.Yeah, no. Claiming that PC isn't a concern because bigger problems exist or similar problems have existed in the past is a fallacy, no matter how you try and spin it. Turning around and saying that the point all along is actually that PC is a good thing and therefore the fallacious reasoning is totally not fallacious anymore is either a goalpost shift or a non-sequitor. Either way, you're kind of making an ass out of yourself.
My actual point when I made that picture is that, just as it says, there have always been social mores and taboos, but anti-PC hysterics try to make out as if not being able to spout off whatever you want whenever you want without consequence is some new and terrifying thing.Yeah, no. Claiming that PC isn't a concern because bigger problems exist or similar problems have existed in the past is a fallacy, no matter how you try and spin it. Turning around and saying that the point all along is actually that PC is a good thing and therefore the fallacious reasoning is totally not fallacious anymore is either a goalpost shift or a non-sequitor. Either way, you're kind of making an ass out of yourself.
My actual point when I made that picture is that, just as it says, there have always been social mores and taboos, but anti-PC hysterics try to make out as if not being able to spout off whatever you want whenever you want without consequence is some new and terrifying thing.Yeah, no. Claiming that PC isn't a concern because bigger problems exist or similar problems have existed in the past is a fallacy, no matter how you try and spin it. Turning around and saying that the point all along is actually that PC is a good thing and therefore the fallacious reasoning is totally not fallacious anymore is either a goalpost shift or a non-sequitor. Either way, you're kind of making an ass out of yourself.
No I think he's saying that acting like PC is the only thing ever that has stopped peoples saying whatever the fuck they want is wrong and ignores the entirety of human history where what you said was strictly controlled and rather than being told you weren't PC consequences ranged from ostracisation to murder. As I understand it that he's not saying that because other cultures and different times people had harsher consequences the matter should be ignored rather that the whole Idea that it is new is fallacious.
I'll be honest, some of that flew straight over my head. Like you said, I'd need to have studied the field. I don't have the framework that you do, and pursuing this further would make me feel hopelessly out of my depth. I don't like feeling stupid, so maybe it's best that we end this here. I hope you understand.
Final statement on my part: I concede that taking 1 000 people at random would be a relatively more accurate method of gauging trends within a 300 000 000+ population than selecting 1 000 people based on some unifying factor. However, despite the possible ignorance of the position, I still maintain that measuring the will of a 300 000 000+ population by the demographics of a survey of 1 000 is wildly inaccurate. Also, flipping the same coin N times isn't really analogous to peering into the opinions of several individual people because the object being measured is fundamentally different.
1. Since when is being home schooled some mark of status?
2. Are they seriously still going with that picture? That's a different person named Trayvon Martin.
That's thing about attacking PC in particular, it isn't a blanket rejection of any hindrance to free expression or a rejection of mores and standards which mean certain things cannot be said. It is not really a free speech argument but being upset that the mores and morals which govern public discourse have changed. So in essence the complaints about PC are usually reactionary complaints about how those mores and morals have changed. Now there are exceptions and those are usually the people who reject that social constraint outright and do not harken back to a comfortable set of constraints but want to move forward to where you can say whatever the fuck you want.
Now for my part I suspect UP would fall into the former category whereas I suspect Art's position is the latter category.
And my position is fuck you crackers...
That's thing about attacking PC in particular, it isn't a blanket rejection of any hindrance to free expression or a rejection of mores and standards which mean certain things cannot be said. It is not really a free speech argument but being upset that the mores and morals which govern public discourse have changed. So in essence the complaints about PC are usually reactionary complaints about how those mores and morals have changed. Now there are exceptions and those are usually the people who reject that social constraint outright and do not harken back to a comfortable set of constraints but want to move forward to where you can say whatever the fuck you want.
Now for my part I suspect UP would fall into the former category whereas I suspect Art's position is the latter category.
And my position is fuck you crackers...
Well, in my case, it's partly that I don't want every little thing I say to be scrutinized for anything that could be taken as having offensive subtext. I'm sick and tired of having to watch every little thing I say be taken as a comment that may hurt some insecure snowflake's precious fee-fees.
And it causes legitimate problems in society. I mean, when supporting meritocracy is labelled a "micro-aggression," (http://www.ucop.edu/academic-personnel-programs/_files/seminars/Tool_Recognizing_Microaggressions.pdf) something is wrong.
That's thing about attacking PC in particular, it isn't a blanket rejection of any hindrance to free expression or a rejection of mores and standards which mean certain things cannot be said. It is not really a free speech argument but being upset that the mores and morals which govern public discourse have changed. So in essence the complaints about PC are usually reactionary complaints about how those mores and morals have changed. Now there are exceptions and those are usually the people who reject that social constraint outright and do not harken back to a comfortable set of constraints but want to move forward to where you can say whatever the fuck you want.
Now for my part I suspect UP would fall into the former category whereas I suspect Art's position is the latter category.
And my position is fuck you crackers...
Well, in my case, it's partly that I don't want every little thing I say to be scrutinized for anything that could be taken as having offensive subtext. I'm sick and tired of having to watch every little thing I say be taken as a comment that may hurt some insecure snowflake's precious fee-fees.
And it causes legitimate problems in society. I mean, when supporting meritocracy is labelled a "micro-aggression," (http://www.ucop.edu/academic-personnel-programs/_files/seminars/Tool_Recognizing_Microaggressions.pdf) something is wrong.
Once again did you even read the link?
From the Meritocracy subset of the microaggressions:
"Of course he’ll get tenure, even though he hasn’t
published much
—
he’s Black!"
Fact is life isn't a level playing field we all start out at different points and have a different incline in the race we run. Again UP if you aren't a prick you are worrying over nothing. Or if you are a prick embrace it your fucking cracker.
UP, maybe stop surfing around in the flakier parts of Tumblr for a while. It's made you a bit paranoid and blindered when we're trying to discuss the actual reasons and relative merits behind changes in contemporary mores and ethics.
UP, maybe stop surfing around in the flakier parts of Tumblr for a while. It's made you a bit paranoid and blindered when we're trying to discuss the actual reasons and relative merits behind changes in contemporary mores and ethics.
However, when your goal is to discredit social justice in the first place, surfing around the flakier parts of Tumblr is how you gather ammo.
UP, maybe stop surfing around in the flakier parts of Tumblr for a while. It's made you a bit paranoid and blindered when we're trying to discuss the actual reasons and relative merits behind changes in contemporary mores and ethics.
However, when your goal is to discredit social justice in the first place, surfing around the flakier parts of Tumblr is how you gather ammo.
If I really wanted to discredit social justice, I wouldn't have to plunge that deep.
UP, maybe stop surfing around in the flakier parts of Tumblr for a while. It's made you a bit paranoid and blindered when we're trying to discuss the actual reasons and relative merits behind changes in contemporary mores and ethics.
However, when your goal is to discredit social justice in the first place, surfing around the flakier parts of Tumblr is how you gather ammo.
If I really wanted to discredit social justice, I wouldn't have to plunge that deep.
And yet, that is your modus operandi. Any time you want to complain about uppity minorities,
the first thing you do is go to tumblr, find someone saying something stupid, and act as though they are representative of the whole.
For example, using Die Cis Scum from a few tumblrinas to act as though cisphobia is totally a thing.
Did somebody say cisphobia? Oh boy, my favorite subject! Let's start with a few direct questions for UltimatePersecution ComplexParagon!
- Why are you more concerned with the negligible harm caused to cis people due to cisphobia than the life-ruining harm caused to trans people due to transphobia?
- Do you still hold the opinion that oppression is a two-way street unless it's noble gamerboobers being oppresed by the eeeevil ess jay doubleyoos?)
- Do you hold up the opinions of the few members of the oppressed class who agree with you against the numerous people that disagree with you because you think that members of The Other are a hivemind with all Real members sharing your opinion, or is it just because you're an ass?
And you gotta love the implication that trans people are predatory.Plus the implicit misandry of treating relationships between women and men as one of prey/predator, too. Can't let anyone with a penis near women or they'll... eat them? Kill them? Rape them? Something bad, certainly.
And you gotta love the implication that trans people are predatory.Plus the implicit misandry of treating relationships between women and men as one of prey/predator, too. Can't let anyone with a penis near women or they'll... eat them? Kill them? Rape them? Something bad, certainly.
And you gotta love the implication that trans people are predatory.Plus the implicit misandry of treating relationships between women and men as one of prey/predator, too. Can't let anyone with a penis near women or they'll... eat them? Kill them? Rape them? Something bad, certainly.
some people are more predatory than others, sure, but that's not the point you were trying to make, i'm sure. there's a reason the derogatory terms "maneater" and "womanizer" exist, after all.
And you gotta love the implication that trans people are predatory.Plus the implicit misandry of treating relationships between women and men as one of prey/predator, too. Can't let anyone with a penis near women or they'll... eat them? Kill them? Rape them? Something bad, certainly.
some people are more predatory than others, sure, but that's not the point you were trying to make, i'm sure. there's a reason the derogatory terms "maneater" and "womanizer" exist, after all.
I doubt it has much to do with any inherent predatory nature of males. More likely it's a reflection of the traditional religious attitude that women are "used up" or "consumed" when they lose their virginity.
And you gotta love the implication that trans people are predatory.Plus the implicit misandry of treating relationships between women and men as one of prey/predator, too. Can't let anyone with a penis near women or they'll... eat them? Kill them? Rape them? Something bad, certainly.
some people are more predatory than others, sure, but that's not the point you were trying to make, i'm sure. there's a reason the derogatory terms "maneater" and "womanizer" exist, after all.
I doubt it has much to do with any inherent predatory nature of males. More likely it's a reflection of the traditional religious attitude that women are "used up" or "consumed" when they lose their virginity.
Nah. The way I see it, this comes from mainly two sources.
a) Certain types of feminists who feel that women are oppressed by the horrible patriarchy and that women are always the victims. Men and their penises are the enemy, the predators, that prey on the defenseless women. You know, the same folks who maintain their belief that PIV sex is ALWAYS rape and that even the women who think they are in a non-violent and consensual relationship are being mistreated and enslaved by their partner, they just don't realize it.
b) Certain types of mens right activists who think that men should do what was mentioned in the previous example.
(http://www.grrrgraphics.com/images/trump_hero_rgb_ben_garrison.jpg)
I dunno...women getting eaten seems to be a pretty common thing in porn, at least. They even seem to enjoy it.
Pretty sure I've seen a boat load of Muslims saying that Radical Islam should be stopped, as a matter of fact most Muslims I've met hate Radical Islam, but knowing whoever drew this they probably group all Muslims with Daesh.
...okay, that last one I have to see. Google just returned something about LoL and clowns.Ask A Good Cartoon about it.
I didn't know Sanders had giant ears.
Oh FFS Ken Ham (https://twitter.com/aigkenham/status/699221328893775872/photo/1).
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbQiF74VIAAyinF.jpg)
(http://oi63.tinypic.com/alroli.jpg)Due to those white blocks I assume the picture originally said something else (not a major surprise) but I'm not sure if it was merely translated or if it originally had a different meaning. For example, it might have said "victims of Syrian civil war" instead of "victims of migrants."
Get it? The news media are opportunists.
Get it? The news media are opportunists.I thought it meant that the kids who drown in the sea between Europe and Africa are victims of their parents being greedy parasites who come to Europe to live like kings with the money the refugees get. But maybe I've just seen too much propaganda against refugees and migrants.
I meant the dead refugee kid was labeled that.And that's the point that the racists make. They claim that refugees who drown in the sea are only in danger because they are greedy and come to Europe to sponge off of the hard working proper people.
(http://40.media.tumblr.com/38d10000c27d9a0ff54e3c028e88b6d0/tumblr_o2t6syQxYl1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
Say, isn't stealing a sin? Someone refresh my memory.....
(http://orig05.deviantart.net/e026/f/2016/074/7/a/reality_of_atheism_by_lordelthibar-d9v7bsh.png)
Oh, here's the Deviantart page I found this on.
http://www.deviantart.com/art/Reality-of-atheism-596605553
You're welcome!
Say, isn't stealing a sin? Someone refresh my memory.....
(http://orig05.deviantart.net/e026/f/2016/074/7/a/reality_of_atheism_by_lordelthibar-d9v7bsh.png)
Oh, here's the Deviantart page I found this on.
http://www.deviantart.com/art/Reality-of-atheism-596605553
You're welcome!
I'm pretty sure I've seen this one before.
Also, I can't say I've ever encountered an anti-theist who ever asked for respect when things weren't going their way. From my experience, they double down under pressure.
And....my comment on this is flagged as spam. What a surprise. Enjoy my new comment while it lasts.
Ah yes, the atheist majority persecuting the poor Christians.
Ah yes, the atheist majority persecuting the poor Christians.
To be fair, that has happened in the past
Say, isn't stealing a sin? Someone refresh my memory.....
(http://orig05.deviantart.net/e026/f/2016/074/7/a/reality_of_atheism_by_lordelthibar-d9v7bsh.png)
Oh, here's the Deviantart page I found this on.
http://www.deviantart.com/art/Reality-of-atheism-596605553
You're welcome!
Ah yes, the atheist majority persecuting the poor Christians.
To be fair, that has happened in the past
No, it really hasn't. But nice try with the historical revisionism.
Say, isn't stealing a sin? Someone refresh my memory.....
(http://orig05.deviantart.net/e026/f/2016/074/7/a/reality_of_atheism_by_lordelthibar-d9v7bsh.png)
Oh, here's the Deviantart page I found this on.
http://www.deviantart.com/art/Reality-of-atheism-596605553
You're welcome!
It is stealing because it's a redrawing of a cartoon where instead of a sign he's belting the guy with a cross and complains of impinging on his religious freedom when the guy goes to break it.
Ah yes, the atheist majority persecuting the poor Christians.
To be fair, that has happened in the past
No, it really hasn't. But nice try with the historical revisionism.
I just posted a kindly warning that it's a copyright infringement. Because it is. Deviantart carries ads. Bet he's saying "Jesus!" in a not-happy way. And the admin takes it down.
mellenORL Edited 2 hours ago
Look, I'm trying to help you to not get into serious trouble. Not criticizing your faith, okay? Here is the link to Deviantart's copyright policy page - about.deviantart.com/policy/co… At least scroll down the page to read "What's Fair Use?", and click the links within that section to research how you can safely and legally alter the original cartoon as a form of "parody", or protest if prefer to call it. "Parody" does not necessarily equal "comedy", it's just part of the legal description of the method by which you could legally alter the original copyrighted cartoon so as to express your opinion about it and your faith.
He's a total chickenshit/batshit flat-out cultist of a "Christian".
Here's my new comment from this morning. No doubt he'll "spam" it off before anybody else gets to read it. He's so stupid, I feel sorry for him. I strongly agree with your comments, but I took a different approach, probably just because I'm old and a softy when it comes to younger folks; "Give 'em lots of slack! You were too passionate or naïve at some point, too."QuotemellenORL Edited 2 hours ago
Look, I'm trying to help you to not get into serious trouble. Not criticizing your faith, okay? Here is the link to Deviantart's copyright policy page - about.deviantart.com/policy/co… At least scroll down the page to read "What's Fair Use?", and click the links within that section to research how you can safely and legally alter the original cartoon as a form of "parody", or protest if prefer to call it. "Parody" does not necessarily equal "comedy", it's just part of the legal description of the method by which you could legally alter the original copyrighted cartoon so as to express your opinion about it and your faith.
ADDENDUM - Ha! He left my comment above intact, and added a link to his source for the original Vs. altered version of the cartoon (links to another paranoid fundie blog, but yeah, what else would he ever read?).
This internet tough guy seems to be not only an art thief, but someone who steals from people who've already stolen from other people. So much for honor among thieves.
This internet tough guy seems to be not only an art thief, but someone who steals from people who've already stolen from other people. So much for honor among thieves.
Much as I enjoy seeing a Christian get thrown to the e-lions, he didn't do anything worthy of criminal prosecution. Calling it "theft" and using words like "stolen" or "stealing" poisons the well and encourages a culture that overcriminalizes the social activity of producing derivative works.
I know such misrepresentation is encouraged by the corporate elite, but their interests in copyright are at odds with the interests of the public.
Europe should strive to reject harmful stereotypes. A good cartoon.
I've never seen the Koran spelled with a C before. (Not a fan of the Q spelling. Qur'an looks like the name of a LOTR Mary Sue.)
Why is the Sikh pig wearing a Jewish star?A xenophobe with poor knowledge of other cultures?
Also, LOL at the fact that that caricature is probably meant to represent Muslims. Wrong turban, racist dipshits.
Take the yin/yang symbol out and you get "Coexit".Hehe, I like it.
As in "collect your friends and belongings and all of you fuck right off". That's a sentiment one can get behind.
Who could listen to Trump and think "This guy is the most mature canidate"?
Who could listen to Trump and think "This guy is the most mature canidate"?
Kids will spend less time focusing on Bieber and Kardashian and more time focusing on how we elect presidents. It will be so cool.
Even just looking at the Republicans I can't see how people could think that Trump is the most responsible and mature candidate. I mean, I disagree with John Kasich on basically everything (except when he says that a contested convention would be good for getting people focused on civics*), but at least he's stayed above the fray, refrained from insulting his opponents, and presented his case to be the Republican nominee in a polite, respectful manner.
Trump, meanwhile, called one of his main opponents "Little Marco," the other "Lyin' Ted," and talked about his dick during a national debate.
*His quote, having to do with the possibility of a contested Republican convention:QuoteKids will spend less time focusing on Bieber and Kardashian and more time focusing on how we elect presidents. It will be so cool.
Even just looking at the Republicans I can't see how people could think that Trump is the most responsible and mature candidate. I mean, I disagree with John Kasich on basically everything (except when he says that a contested convention would be good for getting people focused on civics*), but at least he's stayed above the fray, refrained from insulting his opponents, and presented his case to be the Republican nominee in a polite, respectful manner.
Trump, meanwhile, called one of his main opponents "Little Marco," the other "Lyin' Ted," and talked about his dick during a national debate.
*His quote, having to do with the possibility of a contested Republican convention:QuoteKids will spend less time focusing on Bieber and Kardashian and more time focusing on how we elect presidents. It will be so cool.
Wait, is Justin Bieber still a thing? I thought his fifteen minutes of fame were up.
(http://41.media.tumblr.com/81b14b1f1ea7d01334dcf3ff3c01c63b/tumblr_o5jlbii2zn1rr5t33o1_1280.jpg)
What is it with this depiction of Hillary? Is she supposed to be the Wicked Witch of the Left Wing?
AF Branco is incapable of drawing a flattering - or often recognisable - charicature (sp?)
Not sure which it is supposed to be, then again it was written by a Libertarian and I still don't understand them completely.
I was going to say that the "statist" comments weren't that bad really. Demanding to use your right to free healthcare, which if it exist in that comic is just exercising your rights and if it doesn't then it probably should at least in my opinion. The second panel is debatable, I'm not sure how good the business idea that the fish has come up with actually is within that comic universe but a useful business idea that improves employment rates domestically is a good thing. And the third panel is either a stab at people who oppose refugees getting into your country or it's simply demand that people are hired to do a job only if they are qualified to do it. Not sure which it is supposed to be, then again it was written by a Libertarian and I still don't understand them completely.
I was going to say that the "statist" comments weren't that bad really. Demanding to use your right to free healthcare, which if it exist in that comic is just exercising your rights and if it doesn't then it probably should at least in my opinion. The second panel is debatable, I'm not sure how good the business idea that the fish has come up with actually is within that comic universe but a useful business idea that improves employment rates domestically is a good thing. And the third panel is either a stab at people who oppose refugees getting into your country or it's simply demand that people are hired to do a job only if they are qualified to do it. Not sure which it is supposed to be, then again it was written by a Libertarian and I still don't understand them completely.
I'm pretty sure the last one is meant to be a shot at closed-shop unions, but I agree, it's particularly poorly executed.
Why do these people always make Michelle Obama look like somebody shaved a sasquatch?Because the true measure of a man's greatness is how hot a piece of ass he is tapping.
Hillary is Thic.
Because standing next to each other Obama doesn't tower over Putin at all:
(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/45/d0/b3/45d0b3068cb5c35ae6e85435d3082345.jpg)
Because standing next to each other Obama doesn't tower over Putin at all:
(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/45/d0/b3/45d0b3068cb5c35ae6e85435d3082345.jpg)
What is this even about?
We're dropping so many bombs we're starting to run out.
Because standing next to each other Obama doesn't tower over Putin at all:
(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/45/d0/b3/45d0b3068cb5c35ae6e85435d3082345.jpg)
What is this even about?
Conservatives want to be dominated by a strong soviet manly man, no homo though (or maximum homo, depends who you ask)
Because standing next to each other Obama doesn't tower over Putin at all:
(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/45/d0/b3/45d0b3068cb5c35ae6e85435d3082345.jpg)
What is this even about?
Conservatives want to be dominated by a strong soviet manly man, no homo though (or maximum homo, depends who you ask)
Considering the worrying preponderance of fascists who happen to be homosexual, perhaps there is a deliberate overtone in the "we want to be led by a strong, manly man leader".
Jorg Heider for example demanded his bodyguards be "muscular, blond Aryan men". Presumably so he could ogle them in them tight fascist outfits.
I kind of pity the bastards considering what their preferred form of government invariably does to homosexuals.
The worst part is how unsurprised I am Trump fans are making memes about mass murder.
So in the second worst thing I learned today, racist Trump fans (but I repeat myself) have made a popular internet meme about Trump throwing Clinton, Sanders and left wingers in general out of helicopters inspired by Augusto Pinochet's practice of murdering people the same way.
I don't want to stain my browser history by looking them up, but you can see some of them here
http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2016/06/17/memeday-if-donald-trump-offers-you-a-free-helicopter-ride-say-no/#more-24075
The worst part is how unsurprised I am Trump fans are making memes about mass murder.
Unfortunately we will never know. How long before he's disillusioned with Trump.
I can't believe they didn't learn from 8 years of George Bush.
I don't think they see him so much as "not elite" they see him as not a "typical rich fuck." To a lot of people, a rich fuck is so far up their own ass that they won't even talk to someone of a "lower" class. D Tizzle may either sexually assault you or, at best, be a grandstanding, showboating prick, but at least he'd talk to ya.More likely they believe "elites" fit this stereotype because the actual elites put so much time and effort into convincing them that elites are not the people who actually run things but rather fine arts grads with horn rimmed glasses and a yen for craft beer and fairtrade coffee who control precisely squat!
(https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/15965971_1224295104317365_5977437864114709821_n.jpg?oh=063995cb77532545207ed424796da8e5&oe=58E0DF84)
...As far as I know Obamacare has been mostly working ok, but sure let's rewrite the history.
(https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/15965971_1224295104317365_5977437864114709821_n.jpg?oh=063995cb77532545207ed424796da8e5&oe=58E0DF84)
...As far as I know Obamacare has been mostly working ok, but sure let's rewrite the history.
(http://68.media.tumblr.com/42e17c9302d874460bd8498e8a4ba64b/tumblr_om314rN7iO1rr5t33o1_500.gif)That if there's no spam the only spam will be government spam all there is will be government spam therefore we must welcome and embrace every flashing ad for Russian "dating" services, "photos with boobs from history you wouldn't believe" and "drinking goat urine made me lose 80 pounds" or our glorious spam will not preserve and defend our freedom from their evil freedom hating spam.
I have honestly no clue what this guy is trying to say. Aside from the fact that yes consumers are against telemarketing spam and annoying ads, what does that have to do with the last panel?
Or, to be more precise, fighting spam will lead to banning advertising which will result in the death of commercial TV stations and the only news will be government propaganda.
Funnily enough, this is supposed to show that minimum wage is EVIL and that the poor should be left to die. But it is much easier to see this as an example of why minimum wage (and living wage) is necessary.
If you really want to judge by contribution to society, or skillset for that matter, a landscaper probably deserves the same or higher than a business manager or a computer programmer.
Funnily enough, this is supposed to show that minimum wage is EVIL and that the poor should be left to die. But it is much easier to see this as an example of why minimum wage (and living wage) is necessary.
Where does it imply that the poor should be left to die? It seems to be saying that the minimum wage is killing them.
Of course, the obvious problem is that it takes inequality as a given. If you really want to judge by contribution to society, or skillset for that matter, a landscaper probably deserves the same or higher than a business manager or a computer programmer.
Minimum wage is the water. The water is what is killing people. Ergo, the comic's implication is that minimum wage is destructive, and that welfare is a (broken) attempt to save people from the minimum wage. The artist does not want to leave them to drown; they want to get rid of the water.
Unfortunately, because this artist is just pandering to the base instead of trying to get any ideas across, this cartoon makes no attempt to explain why the minimum wage would be harmful to low-income workers.
(click to show/hide)
Funnily enough, this is supposed to show that minimum wage is EVIL and that the poor should be left to die. But it is much easier to see this as an example of why minimum wage (and living wage) is necessary.
Minimum wage is the water. The water is what is killing people. Ergo, the comic's implication is that minimum wage is destructive, and that welfare is a (broken) attempt to save people from the minimum wage. The artist does not want to leave them to drown; they want to get rid of the water.
Minimum wage is the water. The water is what is killing people. Ergo, the comic's implication is that minimum wage is destructive, and that welfare is a (broken) attempt to save people from the minimum wage. The artist does not want to leave them to drown; they want to get rid of the water.
At which point I'll take their metaphor too literally and ask how the hell they plan to do that. The water is fucking there, what method of removing it could possibly exist that isn't way more expensive then just getting another boat?
Minimum wage is the water. The water is what is killing people. Ergo, the comic's implication is that minimum wage is destructive, and that welfare is a (broken) attempt to save people from the minimum wage. The artist does not want to leave them to drown; they want to get rid of the water.
At which point I'll take their metaphor too literally and ask how the hell they plan to do that. The water is fucking there, what method of removing it could possibly exist that isn't way more expensive then just getting another boat?
The water is the minimum wage. The libertarian argument is that the minimum wage makes it illegal for you to hire people for less than a certain amount, and so it kills every job which provides less value than that amount (since nobody is going to hire you for more money than they make from your labour).
In this metaphor, removing the water means repealing minimum wage laws.
The cartoon does not bother to explain this because, like ~every political cartoon, it's aimed at people who already agree with it
So the Challenger disaster happened because it crashed into what is basically a glass ceiling above the Earth? But what about all of the other successful launches before and after?
So the Challenger disaster happened because it crashed into what is basically a glass ceiling above the Earth? But what about all of the other successful launches before and after?Jesus made an invisible hole to fly their silly rockets into a divine VR holodeck silly! Don't you know Jesus is awesome?
EDIT: Ah, Garrison...
(https://i.redditmedia.com/3BJ9UQryLHTbrMtgvKnXuGiiX7Mmmwbx1FCfUg6gRb8.jpg?w=1022&s=cf96a9db2974639afc32d048440b1b38)
...Does the writer prefer teenage pregnancies or does he just think that women should be the property of their father until they marry?
...Does the writer prefer teenage pregnancies or does he just think that women should be the property of their father until they marry?
My guess is that the writer prefers teenagers to not have sex.
...Does the writer prefer teenage pregnancies or does he just think that women should be the property of their father until they marry?
My guess is that the writer prefers teenagers to not have sex with people other than himself.
(https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/19274771_1390365801043627_4416676748573630403_n.jpg?oh=86ebf2101f674a92d8e7793e86be6efb&oe=599F4773)
...Does the writer prefer teenage pregnancies or does he just think that women should be the property of their father until they marry?
...Does the writer prefer teenage pregnancies or does he just think that women should be the property of their father until they marry?
My guess is that the writer prefers teenagers to not have sex with people other than himself.
Fixed.
Who's pink tie supposed to be?
Well that's certainly a way to make someone you admire look like a complete bully. Good job, moron cartoonist.You assume the cartoonist thinks being a bully is a bad thing. The superficial strength of a bully is what authoritarians admire in a leader.
e) The comic does not include Kirk 'splaining anything. It's a complete non-sequitor.
f) Did the actor who played Sulu come out as trans? If not, then why these characters in particular?
Since when were liberals all about cloning? Since when had anyone been all about cloning? Who the fuck even talks about cloning?Well, since when were liberals about bestiality?
Since when were liberals all about cloning? Since when had anyone been all about cloning? Who the fuck even talks about cloning?
Probably for the best. The author's an outright neo-nazi.
"The Hole Truth"
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”
― Emma Lazarus
These lines appear on a bronze plaque that was installed in 1903 at the base of the Statue of Liberty. Lazarus was a Jewish poet who greatly admired Henry George, an economist who helped spark the progressive era.
It’s an era that brought us the Federal Reserve, the Income Tax, endless foreign wars, myriad social programs, the UN, globalism and the worship of big government.
Many in the Democrat Party proudly call themselves progressives these days, but their philosophy to me is synonymous with socialism. Why can’t we have the best and brightest coming here? No, Emma wanted the ‘refuse’ instead because she enjoyed playing God and imagined herself ‘helping’ them. She was a moral person who would do anything to obtain the fix of being ‘good.’ It must have given her a warm, inner glow to write what she did and the progressives mades sure her sentiments were set in stone in order to make sure everyone knew how good she was. Her plaque is nothing more than progressive virtue signaling.
It has been said that progressives see people as they want them to be. Conservatives see people for who they are. Progressives in Europe (and many of them in America) have welcomed Muslim immigrants with open arms while thinking, “They’re just like us.” No, they’re not. Their culture is completely different. Islam is not just a religion, it’s a political ideology. Its adherents see it as their duty to dominate unbelievers, which they call pejoratively refer to as ‘kafir.’ Muslims love to exploit the stupid kafir and soak up money from welfare programs while also causing crime rates to spike. Many enjoy raping the kafir women, who are asking for it because they don’t wear burkas. Muslims also create no-go zones. They don’t want to assimilate with the kafir. They insist the latter assimilate into their system instead. They insist upon Sharia Law, not the Magna Carta. We don’t need to import disparate cultures with tyrannical ideologies from violent, failed countries. They are NOT ‘just like us.’
In America, President Eisenhower forcibly deported 1.3 million illegal Mexican immigrants under a program titled ‘Operation Wetback.’ Progressives abhorred this ’shameful’ initiative, but Eisenhower’s job was to enforce the law and he proved that it’s possible to deport a great many illegal aliens. In the late 70’s, Jimmy Carter put his bleeding progressive heart on display for everyone to applaud. In a massive display of progressive virtue signaling, he allowed Cuban refugees to come to America. Fidel Castro promptly and laughingly emptied his prisons onto foolish America. In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan signed a bill that allowed nearly three million illegal aliens to gain legal status. Most were from Mexico. What do you think the result was? Millions more beat a path into America to take jobs and get free stuff.
Currently we have another president who wants to enforce the law. Do we have borders or don’t we? Progressives want open borders. Not only do they want legalization, they insist the illegals should also be able to import their families into America. This is known as ‘chain migration,’ but the progressives object to the word ‘chain,’ because they say it hints of slavery. Maybe they’re right—because the U.S. taxpayer becomes the slave to pay for such mindless, progressive egalitarianism.
President Trump and conservatives want a wall on our border—and the immigration laws enforced. Donald Trump is not a big fan of progressivism or political correctness. It’s a big reason why he was elected. The progressives despise the president and hurl the usual names at him, but words such as ‘racist’ and ‘bigot’ are rapidly losing their effectiveness. Those hurling such insults now come across as silly and desperate. It’s not the job of the United States to help people all over the globe by bringing them into America. The progressive Democrats disagree. They know that the wretches who come here and are given a spate of free stuff will almost certainly vote for Democrats.
Progressivism at its essence is nothing more than juvenile virtue signaling.
That’s all it is. But it’s a dangerous form of virtue signaling. They want to help people all over the world and they want you to know they’re good, moral people who will sacrifice your tax dollars to do it. Yes, they’re volunteering your labor to make it happen—by force! We’re talking slavery here. The utopia-obsessed progressives always use government, their favorite instrument of that force, to rob taxpayers at virtual gunpoint to help others. Big government continually grows larger and more corrupt in order to help solve disease, hunger, poverty and crime all over the world. We send aid via vast sums of money all over the world to help the contemptuous recipients, but somehow the problems never get solved! Haiti has remained a dung hole for centuries, while Japan, Germany and South Korea became economic powerhouses only a few decades after devastating wars completely wiped out everything. Could it be that some cultures are superior to others? No. To progressives, that’s bigotry. They prefer to see all people and cultures as ‘equal.’
Progressivism is a form of insanity because they’re not in tune with reality. They have an ostentatious desire to make everyone safe, well-fed, educated, comfortable, and happy. To make it all happen they want to import endless and massive amounts of wretches from shit holes around the world. Most of them will promptly try to change America into a shit hole.
—Ben Garrison
The fact that they failed to spell "immunocompromised" when it was already contained in the image that they were modifying is fantastic.
(https://memestatic.fjcdn.com/pictures/Ancapistan_afadb4_6188694.jpg)
God I hate Ancaps but even they look good next to Alt-Right shits.
(https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/29066269_1641333949280143_6436587736026700901_n.jpg?oh=12b2d1e9bc3a56b2ede79fec0d4a8c39&oe=5B007F89)
I'm putting this here because, the heck is this supposed to mean? WW2 but Germany, USSR and all the other countries were allied against not-Britain? The artist is on way too many levels of metaphors and bad history at the same time.
The sign on the side of the skull is a Sikh religious symbol. What It's doing there, I have no idea.
The sign on the side of the skull is a Sikh religious symbol. What It's doing there, I have no idea.
No, it's the symbol from the Iranian flag.
They also hate cats. who knew.
They also hate cats. who knew.
As well as pinot, apparently.
You gotta love the false dichotomy too. "White women have two choices: an alt-right lifestyle or a degenerate one."
They also hate cats. who knew.
They also hate cats. who knew.
well we can safely say cats hate these people too.
Also, a Nazi dyson sphere? Sounds like a plot to an especially weird episode of Star Trek.I thought they were called skinheads.
Trump is very bad at making himself look not guilty of something. The fact that he even has to mention that he can pardon himself which I'm not sure he can just looks suspicious.
accepting the Presidential pardon means admitting guilt. That is something that we talked about before and there is precedent for it. If he does pardon himself (or people too close to himself) USA either has to impeach him or lose last shreds of their respectability.
Prove to me that cows and chickens are sentient, using the traditional definition of sentience (as in, not one you make up for the purpose of a college essay), and I will stop eating them.
Prove to me that cows and chickens are sentient, using the traditional definition of sentience (as in, not one you make up for the purpose of a college essay), and I will stop eating them.
Sentient- adj., the ability to perceive or feel.
I am pretty sure that mammals, as a group, are sentient.
Sentient and delicious.
Seriously, to hell with chickens. Evil little bastards, the lot of 'em.
Well the picture is from /pol/ but the thread doesn't say much just a bunch of idiots whining about DUH JOOZ!
This is going here because I am not sure whether they are glorifying the end of the rule of law or skewering Trump voters:
(http://theweek.com/cartoons/809998/scotus-obama-bush-clinton-judges-trump-voters)
Are they supposed to be a married couple? Are they in some kind of office? Why is the guy wearing a purple bicycle helmet? Why is the coffee cup sitting in a puddle of water and why has no one cleaned it up? Has this artist ever seen the inside of an apartment before? Why did he smudge grey on the back wall? why is the man about to sit down in what I assume is a dog food bowl? Are they saying that if they have kids now then by the time they're adults there just won't magically be a climate crisis anymore?
Are they supposed to be a married couple? Are they in some kind of office? Why is the guy wearing a purple bicycle helmet? Why is the coffee cup sitting in a puddle of water and why has no one cleaned it up? Has this artist ever seen the inside of an apartment before? Why did he smudge grey on the back wall? why is the man about to sit down in what I assume is a dog food bowl? Are they saying that if they have kids now then by the time they're adults there just won't magically be a climate crisis anymore?
Why does the woman have a saucepan on her desk and why does she seem to have her phone plugged into the coffee maker?
Why is the telescope so tiny that you would have to lay on the floor to use it?
Are they supposed to be a married couple? Are they in some kind of office? Why is the guy wearing a purple bicycle helmet? Why is the coffee cup sitting in a puddle of water and why has no one cleaned it up? Has this artist ever seen the inside of an apartment before? Why did he smudge grey on the back wall? why is the man about to sit down in what I assume is a dog food bowl? Are they saying that if they have kids now then by the time they're adults there just won't magically be a climate crisis anymore?
That looks edited. It doesn't even look like Garrison's art style.
Sorry for the double post, but I had to put this here:(click to show/hide)
I love how the right conflates wanting more socialistic policies like free health care, more affordable education and a more progressive taxing system to a marxist dictatorship of Venezuela.
I wonder if Democrats get to go "ThIs iS wHy AoC wOn" after 2024 when Republicans make any kind of criticism about her?
But that's not really a fair comparison, Trump criticism had more real criticism than any of the AOC complaints that I've seen. This even though there was the occasional joke about his looks.
Hey remember when FOX shat the bed because Obama wore a tan suit and had mustard on his burger?
Maybe this is just me but I only saw the "two scoops" thing coming from places like T_D.
Laughing at Trump, as the libs did, sure stopped him from being POTUS.
Laughing at AOC, as the cons are doing now, sure is hurting her.
Right?
#GalaxyBrain
You know, I never saw her as stupid. She does annoy me, but for other reasons. Like she hasn't made the transition from activist to member of the U.S. Congress. That I believe leads to her emotional appeals over facts. Her Green New Deal is evidence of that. She's pushing way too far way to fast, but she's young yet.
No, her socialism in and of itself never bothered me. But, and this is key, I do not trust my government. Not one bit. Not to keep me safe, not to keep me educated, not to keep me healthy, not to stop crime, nothing. I don't think it's tin foil hat malevolence as much as it is incompetence and bureaucratic inertia. I think given the choice between the right thing and the wrong thing, they'll do nothing for 30 years then find some other third thing. That is not who I would willingly cede more responsibility to than absolutely freaking necessary.
(http://22i18l42a516x0glw28vyk8x4k.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2013-04-10.jpg)
You wanna criticize Ebert? That's fine, it's your right, even if you're this harsh. But doing it right after the man died is fucking despicable.
Ok, that's like someone's opinion on Roger Ebert? What the fuck does this have to do with politics or why is it considered a worst political cartoon? It's not even offensive. People criticize people after they died all of the time.
They'll argue about how bovine farming is a large contributor to green house gas emissions and that you buying cow meat is advancing global warming so that it does effect them individually.
White Supremacy is changing all the time as the definition of white changes. Catholics from Europe used to not count but now even the the alt-right is fine with them. A few decades ago at least some neo-nazi types were interested in making an alliance with Islamists against Israel, but now Muslim immigrants have become the big enemy so I could imagine some Nazis wanting to join forces with the Israeli far right, who have started to grow their own pro-Hitler members
https://www.timesofisrael.com/embracing-racism-rabbis-at-pre-army-yeshiva-laud-hitler-urge-enslaving-arabs/
I can't remember who it was but there was a racism researcher who stated words to the effect of: 'Antisemitism underlies all US white supremacy'. For the reasons dpareja explains it appears that antisemitism is the sina qua non of US racism.
What is hilarious about this cartoon is the acknowledgement by racists that Trump/Maga, alt-right movement is motivated by racism.
Gee. I'm sure you aren't trying to imply anything with this completely natural addition to the conversation.
(Yes, Nation of Islam are a cult with right wing, ethnonationalist garbage of an ideology. Luckily they just have no real institutional power so they are mainly a convenient distraction for "centrist" whataboutists.)
I merely pointed out that when it comes to discussing the threat from ethnonationalism NoI's main significance is as a distraction from the more powerful factions. I don't really care how you feel, my purpose was make this point for the benefit of anyone who might read this conversation and might not be aware of this.
We are not living in the '60s anymore. I'm interested in their significance when discussing the current and very real danger from the far right. When a "centrist" obsessed with horseshoe theory brings them up it is usually as a well-meaning but unintentional distraction, when a conservative or a crypto-nazi does this it's an intentional one.
Sure, if it was a someone with a different forum history I would give them the benefit of a doubt that this is just an interesting historical incident they remembered. When it is someone with a history of making howaboutist implications to preach to us, I see no reason for it. Even if I'm wrong I'm still making a useful point about what to watch out and since I don't care about how you feel there is no negative here for me.
But if he doesn't care how you feel, why the fuck would he bother?
But if he doesn't care how you feel, why the fuck would he bother?
But if he doesn't care how you feel, why the fuck would he bother?
Because if he doesn't, it'll be clear he's just blowing hot air.
Whiny Whatabout Centrist: BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! WAAH THE POOR POOR NAZIS!!
not sure what chaos or any others here are getting ruffled about. all this ethnonationalist shit is the same thing, we're lucky so many of them are stupid and in-fight over whos "actually superior" based on whichever pseudoscientific theory each on possesses. It's all far-right shit.
But if he doesn't care how you feel, why the fuck would he bother?
This. As someone who is generally empathetic to a fault it is actually liberating to be able to not give a fuck about someone's feelings for once.
Edit: and if someone whose opinion I actually care about wants to confront me I might be bothered to dig up some of his previous incarnations' posts to show what I mean.
But guize, there's a miniscule number of domestic Islamic extremists on this (https://www.adl.org/murder-and-extremism-2018#the-perpetrators) chart, a fraction of those could be NoI.
(https://i.imgur.com/y9oyM5R.png)
Whiny Whatabout Centrist: BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! WAAH THE POOR POOR NAZIS!!
Also, did you know the Nazis were National Socialists? So that's really all left-wing terrorism.
not sure what chaos or any others here are getting ruffled about. all this ethnonationalist shit is the same thing, we're lucky so many of them are stupid and in-fight over whos "actually superior" based on whichever pseudoscientific theory each on possesses. It's all far-right shit.
If it was someone else I would have either said nothing or made a more friendly point discussing this issue. This is someone who has a history of trying to point the finger to whoever he thinks is "the other side" and remind that all extremism (= not lukewarm centrism) is equally bad, mmkay.
That influences how I read his posts and where and why I think he is trying to redirect the discussion.
In this case, he completely randomly happened to remember an article about an Islamic cult when we were discussing Israeli far right's co-operation with anti-semitic far right. In my opinion it is valuable to bring up that Nation of Islam is not at all the same as the organizations that have actual institutional power they can use to put their ideology in action. While their ideas are equally awful their position makes them a distraction more than a danger.
It is precisely because this is a less obvious whataboutist misdirection than his usual ones (bringing up a leftist or liberal "equivalent") that I saw it pertinent to pay attention to it.
not sure what chaos or any others here are getting ruffled about. all this ethnonationalist shit is the same thing, we're lucky so many of them are stupid and in-fight over whos "actually superior" based on whichever pseudoscientific theory each on possesses. It's all far-right shit.
If it was someone else I would have either said nothing or made a more friendly point discussing this issue. This is someone who has a history of trying to point the finger to whoever he thinks is "the other side" and remind that all extremism (= not lukewarm centrism) is equally bad, mmkay. That influences how I read his posts and where and why I think he is trying to redirect the discussion.
In this case, he completely randomly happened to remember an article about an Islamic cult when we were discussing Israeli far right's co-operation with anti-semitic far right. In my opinion it is valuable to bring up that Nation of Islam is not at all the same as the organizations that have actual institutional power they can use to put their ideology in action. While their ideas are equally awful their position makes them a distraction more than a danger. It is precisely because this is a less obvious whataboutist misdirection than his usual ones (bringing up a leftist or liberal "equivalent") that I saw it pertinent to pay attention to it.
By the way, you also missed an important point: these far-right factions might hate each other but they also co-operate when it benefits them and even when they fight each other this conflict usually empowers both of them by bringing out the tribalism in people.
"actual institutional power" - President Trump, his cabinet full of white nationalist and fascistic nutbars ("very fine people on both sides"), various police leaders and congressmen ("we need to kill out the problem"), the patriotic sheriffs group...the list goes on and on. Including our former Attorney General who said his only problem with the KKK was that they smoked weed. The only way Trump could find someone more racist and hateful than Sessions would be resurrecting Himmler.
And of course people are biased on here - we're an avowed left wing forum. Nobody can be really free of bias. By correctly reporting climate trends, you're being "biased" against current Conservative political beliefs. Which is "HOOBA HOOBA GAWD DID SAAAAAAAAY THAAAAAAAAT THERE'D BE NOOOOOOOOOOO MORE DESTRUCTION AFTAAAAAAAH THAAAAAH FLAAAAAHD!!"
As for whether I'm being facetious or strawmanning you, I'll spell it out for you; I'm impugning you, I'll keep impugning you, I'll never stop impugning you.
"actual institutional power" - President Trump, his cabinet full of white nationalist and fascistic nutbars ("very fine people on both sides"), various police leaders and congressmen ("we need to kill out the problem"), the patriotic sheriffs group...the list goes on and on. Including our former Attorney General who said his only problem with the KKK was that they smoked weed. The only way Trump could find someone more racist and hateful than Sessions would be resurrecting Himmler.
...That's it? Some quotes without context, vague mentions of "various police leaders and congressmen", and an organization I've never heard of? Let me take a crack at this.
First of all, the quotes. Politifact says Trump's "very fine people" quote was taken out of context (https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/). "We need to kill out the problem" came from the mayor of a small town in Alabama, who was talking about LGBT people (so he's certainly a homophobe, but I don't know if he's a white supremacist). And Sessions' weed remark was a joke (https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/16/jeff-sessions-marijuana-216109).
And what are the "Patriotic Sheriffs"? You talking about the Constitutional Sheriffs?
But fine, maybe you're right about these people being racist. I'm inclined to think Trump's a racist, or at least willing to pander to racists. However, I was asking about avowed white supremacists.And of course people are biased on here - we're an avowed left wing forum. Nobody can be really free of bias. By correctly reporting climate trends, you're being "biased" against current Conservative political beliefs. Which is "HOOBA HOOBA GAWD DID SAAAAAAAAY THAAAAAAAAT THERE'D BE NOOOOOOOOOOO MORE DESTRUCTION AFTAAAAAAAH THAAAAAH FLAAAAAHD!!"
Acknowledging objective, proven, established scientific fact isn't "bias".As for whether I'm being facetious or strawmanning you, I'll spell it out for you; I'm impugning you, I'll keep impugning you, I'll never stop impugning you.
You don't have the moral high ground to impugn me, you Patrick Bateman wannabe.
Whiny Whatabout Centrist: BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! WAAH THE POOR POOR NAZIS!!
Also, did you know the Nazis were National Socialists? So that's really all left-wing terrorism.
I honestly dunno if you're being facetious or legit stramanning me.
The Nazis were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist and it had a lot in common with the modern left. Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist “exploitation” by capitalists , particularly Jewish capitalists, of course. Their programs called for the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, and other major industries. They instituted and vigorously enforced a strict gun control regimen. They encouraged pornography, illegitimacy, and abortion, and they denounced Christians as right-wing fanatics. Yet a popular myth persists that the Nazis themselves were right-wing extremists. This insidious lie biases the entire political landscape today.
In statement after statement, Hitler could not be clearer about his socialist commitments. He said, for example, in a 1927 speech, “We are socialists. We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation … and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”
Whiny Whatabout Centrist: BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! BIAS! WAAH THE POOR POOR NAZIS!!
Also, did you know the Nazis were National Socialists? So that's really all left-wing terrorism.
I honestly dunno if you're being facetious or legit stramanning me.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/09/05/were-nazis-socialists/
http://ufpnews.com/leftists-who-claim-the-nazis-were-right-wing-are-lying-through-their-teeth-heres-why/QuoteThe Nazis were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist and it had a lot in common with the modern left. Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist “exploitation” by capitalists , particularly Jewish capitalists, of course. Their programs called for the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, and other major industries. They instituted and vigorously enforced a strict gun control regimen. They encouraged pornography, illegitimacy, and abortion, and they denounced Christians as right-wing fanatics. Yet a popular myth persists that the Nazis themselves were right-wing extremists. This insidious lie biases the entire political landscape today.Quote from: Convicted felon Dinesh D'SouzaIn statement after statement, Hitler could not be clearer about his socialist commitments. He said, for example, in a 1927 speech, “We are socialists. We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation … and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”
Who the hell said anything about murder? The discussion was about power. You don't need institutional power to clap someone, just a gun.Did Ultimate Skyfirin' Reverse Anal just imply that the capacity to commit violence is divorced from measurable power?
Yeah, it seems our very concerned man here has a thing against inductive reasoning - and of course he defends Sessions with "BUH IT WUZ A JOOOOOKE!" Its not a joke. And even if it was, it wouldn't matter.
The only way the concern troll would admit someone might be a white supremacist is if they were recorded reciting the 14 words while making the Nazi salute. Even then, he would probably claim that they are just trolling. You know, because it is unfair to use inductive reasoning to make conclusions about anyone's motives including his.
Yeah, it seems our very concerned man here has a thing against inductive reasoning - and of course he defends Sessions with "BUH IT WUZ A JOOOOOKE!" Its not a joke. And even if it was, it wouldn't matter.
"Very fine people" was in exactly the right context. And how about that. You're using the same defense Faux Noise uses whenever a conservative gets into trouble for racism or homophobia - It Was Taken Out of Context.
You want more names? How about Steve King. Kobach. Stephen Miller.
Who the hell said anything about murder? The discussion was about power. You don't need institutional power to clap someone, just a gun.Did Ultimate Skyfirin' Reverse Anal just imply that the capacity to commit violence is divorced from measurable power?
It goes without saying that White Supremacists do at the very least have the blessing of a federal US institutions that would rather not acknowledge their deliberate attempts to sow political terror through acts of terrorism as, y'know-terrorism (https://theintercept.com/2019/03/23/domestic-terrorism-fbi-prosecutions/) who'll still slap that label on the fuckin' Animal Liberation Front. (https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/the-threat-of-eco-terrorism)
A quick gander at the FBI's 'domestic terrorism' page shows a couple of blacks, hispanics and women one of whom is an animal liberationist (https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt)-and a distinct lack of Nazis. Weird.
That is institutional power, when institutions give you a free pass.
Might even have something to do with the body count, nothing says friendly nod like the strong arm of the state refusing to call your murderous terrorism exactly that.
Dylan Roof got taken to burger king after he was arrested shooting people...
With the department’s phone ringing nonstop in the background, the young suspect with the bowl-cut hair was locked away in a second-floor conference room with an officer watching over him.
“Organized chaos,” Ledford later called it. “Because there were so many moving parts.”
Including feeding the unexpected arrestee.
“He hadn’t eaten, they said, in a couple of days,” [Pastor Strickland] Maddox said. “They bought him a hamburger. They just sent out for it. I guess one of the police officers went and picked it up.”
Ledford confirmed that this purchase was made.
“He did have something to eat while he was there, and he was secured in cuffs the entire time,” the chief said.
Well, I'd say you're not completely wrong. But saying they "have the blessing of a federal US institutions [sic]" is a massive stretch. Just because they're not specifically called terrorists or charged with terrorism doesn't mean the FBI approves of them. And you may not be aware of the difficulties the FBI faces when it comes to using the label domestic terrorism. (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/04/us/politics/fbi-domestic-terrorism.html)
You're arguing semantics, badly btw.
Roof should've been treated like every other brown terrorist, shot dead in the street where he stood. Instead he was arrested non-violently, fed, and generally treated like a troubled young man instead of an absolute monster.
Ironbite-so there's that.
Well, I'd say you're not completely wrong. But saying they "have the blessing of a federal US institutions [sic]" is a massive stretch. Just because they're not specifically called terrorists or charged with terrorism doesn't mean the FBI approves of them. And you may not be aware of the difficulties the FBI faces when it comes to using the label domestic terrorism. (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/04/us/politics/fbi-domestic-terrorism.html)
Or it could be their unwillingness. (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/03/magazine/FBI-charlottesville-white-nationalism-far-right.html)
Again, fuckin' Animal Liberation Front. (https://theintercept.com/2019/03/23/ecoterrorism-fbi-animal-rights/) Now ALF absolutely tries to terrorise but it hasn't killed anybody. The rule in America seems to be, terrorise a bunch of researchers involved in animal testing with acts of arson and industrial sabotage because you hate scientists who test bunny rabbits and chimps and you're legally a terrorist. Terrorise some black people by taking their lives because you hate black people and you're a "domestic extremist" at best, though possibly just suffering from "mental health issues." And no president has ever called anyone from ALF "very fine people."
Careful, suggesting institutional bias exists to a rabid centrist can cause epic tantrums, especially if there's evidence for such.
Animal liberationists, greenies and other assorted Quinoa and mung bean flavored hippies vandalize to terrorize, FBI be like "yeah, totes terrorism."Careful, suggesting institutional bias exists to a rabid centrist can cause epic tantrums, especially if there's evidence for such.
I'm not saying institutional bias doesn't exist, just that you're exaggerating it and it's not the only factor.
I read the politifact thing and I don't "very fine people on both sides" is all that badly out of context or that politifact was claiming it was in the first place. Trump said that he was taken out of context, so Politifact said "Okay here's the context judge for yourself." And most of what he says is equivocating bullshit designed to downplay what the Charlottesville rally was about.
I read the politifact thing and I don't "very fine people on both sides" is all that badly out of context or that politifact was claiming it was in the first place. Trump said that he was taken out of context, so Politifact said "Okay here's the context judge for yourself." And most of what he says is equivocating bullshit designed to downplay what the Charlottesville rally was about.
I read the politifact thing and I don't "very fine people on both sides" is all that badly out of context or that politifact was claiming it was in the first place. Trump said that he was taken out of context, so Politifact said "Okay here's the context judge for yourself." And most of what he says is equivocating bullshit designed to downplay what the Charlottesville rally was about.
And you had people, and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. OK?
Tl;dr- Trump is less than credible and fabricates doubt where there is none because he’s a sophist.That sounds linguistically close to sophisticated, never thought a man with a gold plated shitter composed entirely of cheeseburgers and fries would get close to that!
Tl;dr- Trump is less than credible and fabricates doubt where there is none because he’s a sophist.That sounds linguistically close to sophisticated
Was being unserious, but yeah, etymology can turn up some pretty weird shit.Tl;dr- Trump is less than credible and fabricates doubt where there is none because he’s a sophist.That sounds linguistically close to sophisticated
That is the original meaning of the word, yes.
I think that's supposed to be Schumer. But I don't think anyone from the Democrats wants to impeach Pelosi.
The Left can’t meme, while the Right has an impressive roll call of Meme Warriors. When it comes to funny, high impact memes that launch weaponized truth directly at the Left’s delusional fantasies, the Right wins every time! The Meme Warriors include:
Carpe Donktum, his memes have been retweeted by President Trump twice. @carpedonktum
The Geekz Team, his amazing action memes are incredible. @thegeekzteam
Mad Liberals, A perfect combination of memes that make liberals cry salty tears with a dash of Monty Python. @mad_liberals
Solmemes, A regular meme workhorse pumping out high quality memes that give the left bad dreams. @Solmemes1
Thug Life, The warrior behind the scenes that enhances memes for everyone and produces those memes where people end up with glasses and a joint. @ThugLifenewShit
Big Game Productions, Making MAGA manga style video comic books and Making Comic Books Great Again! @BGProductions
Something Wicked, he has an arsenal of video game memes. @som3thingwicked
TT Cube, The meme warrior’s tech guy, if any one has any questions, he is the man to ask. @tt_cube
Maybe it's because I'm old. But why is there a subset of young voters who will vote for a president solely based off of the best memes? I saw a post on ask a liberal the other day saying I want to vote for someone on the left but they just don't have the best memes.When politics does not seem to affect you personally, when no one is campaigning to make your sexuality illegal or otherwise about to harm you, it just doesn't seem important. Then you get people making their choice based on superficial aspects like "which candidate is the tallest one?" or "who has the best memes?"
I think that's supposed to be Schumer. But I don't think anyone from the Democrats wants to impeach Pelosi.
There's going to be pressure mounting on her either to allow an impeachment inquiry to begin or to step down as Speaker.
And frankly, they should impeach--just not on obstruction. (The argument "you can't have obstruction without an underlying crime," while wrong, will resonate with all too many people.) They should impeach over emoluments, because on that one they have Trump completely cold (remember, Jimmy Carter had to sell his peanut farm), and it's actually a Constitutional demand on the President, and so any Republican who votes against impeachment or conviction can be instantly branded as not giving a fuck about the Constitution.
Maybe it's because I'm old. But why is there a subset of young voters who will vote for a president solely based off of the best memes? I saw a post on ask a liberal the other day saying I want to vote for someone on the left but they just don't have the best memes.When politics does not seem to affect you personally, when no one is campaigning to make your sexuality illegal or otherwise about to harm you, it just doesn't seem important. Then you get people making their choice based on superficial aspects like "which candidate is the tallest one?" or "who has the best memes?"
So basically the right wing memers are either wealthy white kids who have nothing to worry about other than some imagined persecution complex because some black guy on the internet is saying he wants to be treated like a white person, or a foreigner who will not be effected by the election and is just trying to stir chaos for the lulz?
You think that's a shit cartoonist?
(https://i.imgur.com/MY1lzYw.jpg)
BOOM! What do you say to that?`
In his notes he explains who the right-wing memers in the picture are because nothing says "famous and successful memer" like being forced to name each of them and explain how being retweeted by Trump twice(!) makes you notable.Quote
The Left can’t meme, while the Right has an impressive roll call of Meme Warriors. When it comes to funny, high impact memes that launch weaponized truth directly at the Left’s delusional fantasies, the Right wins every time! The Meme Warriors include:
Carpe Donktum, his memes have been retweeted by President Trump twice. @carpedonktum
The Geekz Team, his amazing action memes are incredible. @thegeekzteam
Mad Liberals, A perfect combination of memes that make liberals cry salty tears with a dash of Monty Python. @mad_liberals
Solmemes, A regular meme workhorse pumping out high quality memes that give the left bad dreams. @Solmemes1
Thug Life, The warrior behind the scenes that enhances memes for everyone and produces those memes where people end up with glasses and a joint. @ThugLifenewShit
Big Game Productions, Making MAGA manga style video comic books and Making Comic Books Great Again! @BGProductions
Something Wicked, he has an arsenal of video game memes. @som3thingwicked
TT Cube, The meme warrior’s tech guy, if any one has any questions, he is the man to ask. @tt_cube
I think that's supposed to be Schumer. But I don't think anyone from the Democrats wants to impeach Pelosi.
There's going to be pressure mounting on her either to allow an impeachment inquiry to begin or to step down as Speaker.
And frankly, they should impeach--just not on obstruction. (The argument "you can't have obstruction without an underlying crime," while wrong, will resonate with all too many people.) They should impeach over emoluments, because on that one they have Trump completely cold (remember, Jimmy Carter had to sell his peanut farm), and it's actually a Constitutional demand on the President, and so any Republican who votes against impeachment or conviction can be instantly branded as not giving a fuck about the Constitution.
I still suspect you'll see Pelosi move on obstruction after the debt ceiling and government funding bills are finally done later this year. Until then, they can't risk giving Trump a reason to be a moron, as he can single-handedly block those bills, and he won't understand why passing those bills is so important. After all, declaring bankruptcy and laughing has been his go-to business move for most of his life; why wouldn't it work for the US too?
I think that's supposed to be Schumer. But I don't think anyone from the Democrats wants to impeach Pelosi.
There's going to be pressure mounting on her either to allow an impeachment inquiry to begin or to step down as Speaker.
And frankly, they should impeach--just not on obstruction. (The argument "you can't have obstruction without an underlying crime," while wrong, will resonate with all too many people.) They should impeach over emoluments, because on that one they have Trump completely cold (remember, Jimmy Carter had to sell his peanut farm), and it's actually a Constitutional demand on the President, and so any Republican who votes against impeachment or conviction can be instantly branded as not giving a fuck about the Constitution.
I still suspect you'll see Pelosi move on obstruction after the debt ceiling and government funding bills are finally done later this year. Until then, they can't risk giving Trump a reason to be a moron, as he can single-handedly block those bills, and he won't understand why passing those bills is so important. After all, declaring bankruptcy and laughing has been his go-to business move for most of his life; why wouldn't it work for the US too?
Trump doesn't need a reason to be a moron on that stuff. He already set a record for the longest government shutdown; who says he won't try again? (Trump can rally his base against any Republican who votes to override his vetoes, after all, and they saw what happened to Mark Sanford, they're seeing what's happening to Justin Amash, and they have the lion's share of Senators up for reelection this time around.)
And bankruptcy is, as you say, his business model, so he doesn't really need a reason to veto the debt ceiling bill, either.
So there's still going to be pressure on Pelosi either to allow an impeachment inquiry or to step down--or, perhaps, if Trump does veto one of those bills, to try to get enough Senate Republicans (who aren't up for reelection) onside to invoke the 25th Amendment.
"MAGA manga style video comic books"?
Whatever "video comic books" are supposed to be, that sounds horrible.
Yeah, and tell me why Jon Snow is the representation of one of them: we all know that he knows nothing and he boinked his aunt.
So, Ilhan Omar triggers BG because of "bigotry", ok Ben.
Yeah, and he has the audacity to complain about Neo-Nazis editing his comics - he IS an anti-semite, same as them.
Yep, Ben is against Anti-Semitism... As shown in shit like this:
(https://rationalwiki.org/w/images/5/52/Ben_Garrison_censored.jpg)
LOL, why did they need Jesus to settle that misunderstanding? There is no connection at all :D
LOL, why did they need Jesus to settle that misunderstanding? There is no connection at all :D
Remember, in Fundieland, everything is possible with Jesus and nothing is possible without Jesus.
And that the existence of autistic people is equally as bad as slavery (I think that's what they mean anyway.)
And that the existence of autistic people is equally as bad as slavery (I think that's what they mean anyway.)
Well, duh. All autists are low-functioning, flailing behemoths with the strength of a raging gorilla and the mind of a chihuahua. [/s, but that should be fucking obvious]
Gods, Autism Speaks is so horrible. I don't need to be cured, thank you. And the worst part is that they keep getting prominent support and treated as a legitimate autism organization.
What are they going to say about Trump's comment about US Jews showing 'disloyalty'?
What are they going to say about Trump's comment about US Jews showing 'disloyalty'?
The same thing Trump himself said and did; shift from anti-Semitism to claiming that the Dems are anti-Semitic without missing a beat and without even seeing the hypocrisy.
Ben is Back
(https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/vaxxed_cartoon_web-768x548.jpg)
Fortunately the vaccine supporters race car is much faster and more aerodynamic then the anti-vaxxer's bus and will thus win the fight to make sure kids will get a future.
I assume E-Girls are like cam girls. But seriously what girl hasn't slept with more than one guy if she's in her 20s? Unless she has only been in one long term relationship. In any event who gives a fuck. Everyone should be wearing condoms anyway. They need to bring back the grim reaper ads which terrified me into condom use as a kid.
"Another day on a dating websi---"
"PLS BE MY KAWAII JAPANESE PURE PERFECT SINLESS WAIFU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU!!!
"...and blocked."
Racists will blame anything and everything they consider "degenerate" (meaning BAD THING ME NO LIKE!!) or that they consider negative on the Jews.
No matter how little sense it makes.
That's a worst political cartoon? It pretty much seems like what they do.
Is that Donald Trump or Stephen Harper? Because it looks like Winston Roundtree's hilarious take on Stephen Harper...I think it may be Bill Gates, there's a conspiracy theory doing the rounds (https://www.mediamatters.org/coronavirus-covid-19/bill-gates-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory-spread-social-media-and-then-fox-news) coming from 4chan that he's the next Soros or something.
http://www.viruscomix.com/page461.html
You know, there's a difference between criticizing the society you live in and actively supporting businesses whose practices you claim to hate.
A) The problem is that so much of our lives is run by giant companies that are almost all horrible, to the point where if you don't want to support businesses that are evil you basically need to live in an Amish community or something.
B) It's still a logical fallacy to dismiss someone's stance because they are a hypocrite in one way or another. If I say "Don't smoke, it's bad for you" after eating bacon, the fact that bacon is also bad doesn't mean I'm wrong to say not to smoke.
A) The problem is that so much of our lives is run by giant companies that are almost all horrible, to the point where if you don't want to support businesses that are evil you basically need to live in an Amish community or something.
B) It's still a logical fallacy to dismiss someone's stance because they are a hypocrite in one way or another. If I say "Don't smoke, it's bad for you" after eating bacon, the fact that bacon is also bad doesn't mean I'm wrong to say not to smoke.
a. You say that like there's never a choice. In the cartoon, the woman in the first two panels doesn't like Apple exploiting Chinese sweatshop labor. Neither do I, which is why I've been using BlackBerry phones for years. Maybe my next one will be a Fairphone.
A) The problem is that so much of our lives is run by giant companies that are almost all horrible, to the point where if you don't want to support businesses that are evil you basically need to live in an Amish community or something.
B) It's still a logical fallacy to dismiss someone's stance because they are a hypocrite in one way or another. If I say "Don't smoke, it's bad for you" after eating bacon, the fact that bacon is also bad doesn't mean I'm wrong to say not to smoke.
a. You say that like there's never a choice. In the cartoon, the woman in the first two panels doesn't like Apple exploiting Chinese sweatshop labor. Neither do I, which is why I've been using BlackBerry phones for years. Maybe my next one will be a Fairphone.
Foxconn, the iPhone manufacturer famous for the number of suicides at its factories, also made phones for BlackBerry. Maybe Fairphone does better, idk, but it is in fact genuinely hard to buy a smartphone that wasn't made using Chinese labour under shitty conditions.
Increasingly, smartphone ownership is in fact a requirement to participate in society (Internet access is, definitely, and I don't think non-smartphone electronics are much better re: labour conditions). So I think the point is equally apt. For most people, not paying money to a company engaged in some sort of terrible business practice you hate is not a realistic option.
A) The problem is that so much of our lives is run by giant companies that are almost all horrible, to the point where if you don't want to support businesses that are evil you basically need to live in an Amish community or something.
B) It's still a logical fallacy to dismiss someone's stance because they are a hypocrite in one way or another. If I say "Don't smoke, it's bad for you" after eating bacon, the fact that bacon is also bad doesn't mean I'm wrong to say not to smoke.
a. You say that like there's never a choice. In the cartoon, the woman in the first two panels doesn't like Apple exploiting Chinese sweatshop labor. Neither do I, which is why I've been using BlackBerry phones for years. Maybe my next one will be a Fairphone.
Foxconn, the iPhone manufacturer famous for the number of suicides at its factories, also made phones for BlackBerry. Maybe Fairphone does better, idk, but it is in fact genuinely hard to buy a smartphone that wasn't made using Chinese labour under shitty conditions.
Increasingly, smartphone ownership is in fact a requirement to participate in society (Internet access is, definitely, and I don't think non-smartphone electronics are much better re: labour conditions). So I think the point is equally apt. For most people, not paying money to a company engaged in some sort of terrible business practice you hate is not a realistic option.
I know BlackBerry phones were manufactured in China for a few years, but I don't think that's accurate, since The Good Shopping Guide gave them their top rating in human rights (https://thegoodshoppingguide.com/subject/mobile-phones/). As for Fairphone, I think you might find it interesting (https://www.lifehack.org/articles/technology/switch-use-this-ethical-smartphone-fairphone.html). Unfortunately, they don't sell outside Europe at the moment, but I can always buy secondhand.
And in any case, China was losing its position (https://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-vietnam-phone-manufacturing) as "the world's smartphone manufacturer" even before the Wuhan virus.
Huh. Apparently, I stand corrected. Still, I know for a fact that my current BlackBerry was made in Canada.
Okay Vanto, take the amount of work you've just done to figure out which phone is least evil, and apply it to every single good and service you buy. Every store, online retailer, product and service. Do you do that? Is it reasonable to expect every person with a nine to five job and kids to take care of and classes to study for to do that? Does this make things cost more in ways that might but a lot of basic goods out of reach for a lot of poor people?
Huh. Apparently, I stand corrected. Still, I know for a fact that my current BlackBerry was made in Canada.
It's likely more accurate to say that your phone was assembled in Canada. There are still going to be components that are simply not available in bulk outside of China. Compromises have to be made in some areas. It's simply unavoidable. Does that mean that you shouldn't advocate for better labor conditions? Of course not. But it is naive to think that you can make THAT much effort for literally everything you buy. For TVs and other flatscreen monitors? There is no screen manufacturer that produces LCD and OLED screens outside of east Asia. Computer hardware? Well, surprisingly, there are a few things you can get (https://www.neweggbusiness.com/smartbuyer/components/born-in-the-usa-computer-hardware-made-in-america/), but most components are manufactured in Asia or Latin America. And again, a lot of those components would be more accurately described as assembled in America.
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. This is because it's functionally impossible to live without having to support unethical practices somewhere.
Okay Vanto, take the amount of work you've just done to figure out which phone is least evil, and apply it to every single good and service you buy. Every store, online retailer, product and service. Do you do that? Is it reasonable to expect every person with a nine to five job and kids to take care of and classes to study for to do that? Does this make things cost more in ways that might but a lot of basic goods out of reach for a lot of poor people?
Okay Vanto, take the amount of work you've just done to figure out which phone is least evil, and apply it to every single good and service you buy. Every store, online retailer, product and service. Do you do that? Is it reasonable to expect every person with a nine to five job and kids to take care of and classes to study for to do that? Does this make things cost more in ways that might but a lot of basic goods out of reach for a lot of poor people?
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Or at least very, very little. Enough that it's near impossible if you aren't living off-grid.
Okay Vanto, take the amount of work you've just done to figure out which phone is least evil, and apply it to every single good and service you buy. Every store, online retailer, product and service. Do you do that? Is it reasonable to expect every person with a nine to five job and kids to take care of and classes to study for to do that? Does this make things cost more in ways that might but a lot of basic goods out of reach for a lot of poor people?
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Or at least very, very little. Enough that it's near impossible if you aren't living off-grid.
I've heard that song-and-dance before, and frankly, I'm not convinced for reasons I've discussed above. There are ethical options that often get overlooked.
Or is there an economic system with a greater amount of ethical consumption than capitalism?
Okay Vanto, take the amount of work you've just done to figure out which phone is least evil, and apply it to every single good and service you buy. Every store, online retailer, product and service. Do you do that? Is it reasonable to expect every person with a nine to five job and kids to take care of and classes to study for to do that? Does this make things cost more in ways that might but a lot of basic goods out of reach for a lot of poor people?
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Or at least very, very little. Enough that it's near impossible if you aren't living off-grid.
I've heard that song-and-dance before, and frankly, I'm not convinced for reasons I've discussed above. There are ethical options that often get overlooked.
Or is there an economic system with a greater amount of ethical consumption than capitalism?
And WHY do they get overlooked. Because of how the system is set up. It pays big bucks to get around loopholes or use child slaves in African mines instead of actual workers that you have to like, pay money so they could actually eat and shit. Just like without protest it pays for companies to cheaply test stuff on animals that ends up hurting them, or it pays for cops to just get away with choking people to death. The profit motive means a lot of people who have the power to get away with things will do harmful actions simply because they can.
And yes, there is and there will be a more ethical system. Democratic Socialism, maybe even Anarchism and actual limited government some point in the future when its the workers that are no longer alienated and are making decisions they know will affect other people like them more directly and be disincentivized from doing things that increase the likelihood of suffering..
Sorry, but if I have to deal with the realities of how things are right now, so do you. No hypothetical systems. You (rightly) wouldn't accept the currently hypothetical, idealized version of capitalism where nobody gets exploited, after all.
Okay Vanto, take the amount of work you've just done to figure out which phone is least evil, and apply it to every single good and service you buy. Every store, online retailer, product and service. Do you do that? Is it reasonable to expect every person with a nine to five job and kids to take care of and classes to study for to do that? Does this make things cost more in ways that might but a lot of basic goods out of reach for a lot of poor people?
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Or at least very, very little. Enough that it's near impossible if you aren't living off-grid.
I've heard that song-and-dance before, and frankly, I'm not convinced for reasons I've discussed above. There are ethical options that often get overlooked.
Or is there an economic system with a greater amount of ethical consumption than capitalism?
And WHY do they get overlooked. Because of how the system is set up. It pays big bucks to get around loopholes or use child slaves in African mines instead of actual workers that you have to like, pay money so they could actually eat and shit. Just like without protest it pays for companies to cheaply test stuff on animals that ends up hurting them, or it pays for cops to just get away with choking people to death. The profit motive means a lot of people who have the power to get away with things will do harmful actions simply because they can.
And yes, there is and there will be a more ethical system. Democratic Socialism, maybe even Anarchism and actual limited government some point in the future when its the workers that are no longer alienated and are making decisions they know will affect other people like them more directly and be disincentivized from doing things that increase the likelihood of suffering..
Sorry, but if I have to deal with the realities of how things are right now, so do you. No hypothetical systems. You (rightly) wouldn't accept the currently hypothetical, idealized version of capitalism where nobody gets exploited, after all.
The more I look at it, the worse it gets. Why are Putin and Kim Jong Un in the background?
Even though it's Christmas, Ramirez remains a hack:
(https://theweek.com/cartoons/956673/editorial-cartoon-federal-deficit)
Should be noted that it was single digit temperatures for about two weeks straight here in Wisconsin. And yet no power outages. It's almost like the issue isn't the kind of power plants Texas has, but rather their failure to winterize them....
Should be noted that it was single digit temperatures for about two weeks straight here in Wisconsin. And yet no power outages. It's almost like the issue isn't the kind of power plants Texas has, but rather their failure to winterize them....