FSTDT Forums
Rubbish => Preaching and Worship => Topic started by: Jacob Harrison on October 24, 2018, 07:32:28 pm
-
I did more research and discovered evidence that Harold Godwinson was likely a descendant of Æthelm son of Æthelred I who should of inherited the throne instead of Æthelred’s brother Alfred the Great. Therefore Harold Godwinson was the rightful King of England. I know about the oath to William the Conqueror’s but since Edward the Confessor was not planning for William to succeed him, the oath should not have had affect on William being his successor.
Harold Godwinson’s heir by primogeniture is Karl von Habsburg. So King Michael in Parallel Hero should be his son. Michael’s Parallel self in this universe is this guy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Zvonimir_von_Habsburg
Jaime ruled the Europan Kingdom from 2015 till his death in 2018. My parallel self realized that Michael was the true heir, and spoke in favor of his succession and thus he became King in 2018, around the time the events of Parallel Hero take place.
So Niam, the information that Michael succeeded to the throne because I discovered he was the true heir should be included sometime in the story.
-
oh my god you are obsessed
-
Anyway, in this universe, I can convince the English to put the true heir on the throne by promoting English nationalism, saying that Karl Von Habsburg is descended from England’s last Anglo Saxon monarch while Elizabeth is descended from the bloody Normans that conquered England.
-
This forum isn't England, just in case you were unaware. So you're already doing that part wrong.
-
This forum isn't England, just in case you were unaware. So you're already doing that part wrong.
I know that. I posted about it here because it is important information for Niam to know because it explains how Michael became King in Parallel Hero. By the way, Niam needs to change his profile because his signature says "Living life, lifting, waiting for summer" and summer's over. I also wonder if his broken toe's better so that he can work on Chapter 11 part 2.
-
Anyway, in this universe, I can convince the English to put the true heir on the throne by promoting English nationalism, saying that Karl Von Habsburg is descended from England’s last Anglo Saxon monarch while Elizabeth is descended from the bloody Normans that conquered England.
When you try and convince the English can you screenshot their responses? I'm a fan of British comedy!
-
Well, good luck with that, buddy. Be sure to keep us updated.
-
I will post about the true heir on Reddit United Kingdom..
-
And now I posted it. https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/9rpsnj/the_real_rightful_heir_to_the_throne_of_england/
-
And now I posted it. https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/9rpsnj/the_real_rightful_heir_to_the_throne_of_england/
Arg my reddit post got removed! >:(
-
Gee I wonder why.
-
And now I posted it. https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/9rpsnj/the_real_rightful_heir_to_the_throne_of_england/
Arg my reddit post got removed! >:(
Damnit, I wanted to see some posts from pissed off Englishmen. Liberal and frequent use of terms like "prat, berk, tosser" and "gobshite."
Ah well.
-
By the way, Niam needs to change his profile because his signature says "Living life, lifting, waiting for summer" and summer's over.
He's waiting for next year's summer.
-
I wonder why Tolpuddle Martyr and Art Vandelay are not passionate the rightful heir to England is like I am. They are Australian, so they obviously have English ancestry, so who is on the English throne should be something they should be passionate about.
-
Because democracy is vastly superiour to a hereditary dictatorship. If the English royals were anything more than a glorified tourist attraction, I'd if anything be passionate about getting rid of the pricks entirely.
-
Because democracy is vastly superiour to a hereditary dictatorship. If the English royals were anything more than a glorified tourist attraction, I'd if anything be passionate about getting rid of the pricks entirely.
Precisely.
The continued existence of the monarchy as an emaciated institution reminds us of how long and hard the fight for democracy was.
-
Because democracy is vastly superiour to a hereditary dictatorship. If the English royals were anything more than a glorified tourist attraction, I'd if anything be passionate about getting rid of the pricks entirely.
But your English ancestors served the rightful Kings of England. You probably have many who fought for them, and maybe even fought for Harold Godwinson in the Battle of Hastings. The monarchy is therefore part of your English heritage. It is part of mine too since I have English ancestry which is why I am so obsessed with the true heir.
-
Because democracy is vastly superiour to a hereditary dictatorship. If the English royals were anything more than a glorified tourist attraction, I'd if anything be passionate about getting rid of the pricks entirely.
But your English ancestors served the rightful Kings of England. You probably have many who fought for them, and maybe even fought for Harold Godwinson in the Battle of Hastings. The monarchy is therefore part of your English heritage. It is part of mine too since I have English ancestry which is why I am so obsessed with the true heir.
Yes, well I also have a lot of Irish and Balkan ancestry. A lot more than I have English, for that matter. However, that doesn't mean I'm going to run around throwing pipe bombs for Jesus just because my ancestors were most likely into it, now does it?
-
I like the monarchy as it is now. They're a head of state with no real power who can basically present a nice public "face" for the UK and the Commonwealth to the outside world. They're basically Britain's PR firm, and they're doing great.
Can you imagine how much better we in the US would look if, instead of having the flaming pile of orange-haired shit representing America to the world, we instead had a mild-mannered, smiling diplomatic dude whose only job was to represent America and not screw up? Man, we need to get ourselves a powerless King, we'd look way better.
-
I wonder why Tolpuddle Martyr and Art Vandelay are not passionate the rightful heir to England is like I am. They are Australian, so they obviously have English ancestry, so who is on the English throne should be something they should be passionate about.
My dear wifey, when she was with us, had an Italian mum and a Polish dad but was born in Sheffield. She was English, she was born there, I wasn't because I was born in an East Melbourne hospital a stones throw from the Melbourne Cricket Ground. I'm Aussie, that's how that stuff works.
As for my ancestors, yeah I am kinda interested in their stories but not the snotty toffs that lived in castles up the road. That said if I have an ancestor thst turns out to be a lord I'll have a good laugh about it and if I'm the rightful heir to the throne of England I'll abdicate in favour of actual British federalism and a British Republic, ta.
-
I like the monarchy as it is now. They're a head of state with no real power who can basically present a nice public "face" for the UK and the Commonwealth to the outside world. They're basically Britain's PR firm, and they're doing great.
Can you imagine how much better we in the US would look if, instead of having the flaming pile of orange-haired shit representing America to the world, we instead had a mild-mannered, smiling diplomatic dude whose only job was to represent America and not screw up? Man, we need to get ourselves a powerless King, we'd look way better.
Yeah but then you'd have Prime Minister Paul Ryan.
-
I wonder why Tolpuddle Martyr and Art Vandelay are not passionate the rightful heir to England is like I am. They are Australian, so they obviously have English ancestry, so who is on the English throne should be something they should be passionate about.
My dear wifey, when she was with us, had an Italian mum and a Polish dad but was born in Sheffield. She was English, she was born there, I wasn't because I was born in an East Melbourne hospital a stones throw from the Melbourne Cricket Ground. I'm Aussie, that's how that stuff works.
As for my ancestors, yeah I am kinda interested in their stories but not the snotty toffs that lived in castles up the road. That said if I have an ancestor thst turns out to be a lord I'll have a good laugh about it and if I'm the rightful heir to the throne of England I'll abdicate in favour of actual British federalism and a British Republic, ta.
If I discovered that you were the rightful heir, I would kidnap a relative of yours in line of the succession since your childless and raise him to pursue the thrones. Do you have any nephews?
-
I wonder why Tolpuddle Martyr and Art Vandelay are not passionate the rightful heir to England is like I am. They are Australian, so they obviously have English ancestry, so who is on the English throne should be something they should be passionate about.
My dear wifey, when she was with us, had an Italian mum and a Polish dad but was born in Sheffield. She was English, she was born there, I wasn't because I was born in an East Melbourne hospital a stones throw from the Melbourne Cricket Ground. I'm Aussie, that's how that stuff works.
As for my ancestors, yeah I am kinda interested in their stories but not the snotty toffs that lived in castles up the road. That said if I have an ancestor thst turns out to be a lord I'll have a good laugh about it and if I'm the rightful heir to the throne of England I'll abdicate in favour of actual British federalism and a British Republic, ta.
If I discovered that you were the rightful heir, I would kidnap a relative of yours in line of the succession since your childless and raise him to pursue the thrones. Do you have any nephews?
I'd almost like to see you try.
-
I wonder why Tolpuddle Martyr and Art Vandelay are not passionate the rightful heir to England is like I am. They are Australian, so they obviously have English ancestry, so who is on the English throne should be something they should be passionate about.
My dear wifey, when she was with us, had an Italian mum and a Polish dad but was born in Sheffield. She was English, she was born there, I wasn't because I was born in an East Melbourne hospital a stones throw from the Melbourne Cricket Ground. I'm Aussie, that's how that stuff works.
As for my ancestors, yeah I am kinda interested in their stories but not the snotty toffs that lived in castles up the road. That said if I have an ancestor thst turns out to be a lord I'll have a good laugh about it and if I'm the rightful heir to the throne of England I'll abdicate in favour of actual British federalism and a British Republic, ta.
If I discovered that you were the rightful heir, I would kidnap a relative of yours in line of the succession since your childless and raise him to pursue the thrones. Do you have any nephews?
Said nephews all live in Eveleigh St in the Sydney suburb of Redfern and will only come out if you show the secret symbol-wear a white robe and a hood. Let me know how it goes.
Specifically you have to wear Spanish Capirote (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capirote) get up, they're all good Catholics-it's essential.
-
I like the monarchy as it is now. They're a head of state with no real power who can basically present a nice public "face" for the UK and the Commonwealth to the outside world. They're basically Britain's PR firm, and they're doing great.
Can you imagine how much better we in the US would look if, instead of having the flaming pile of orange-haired shit representing America to the world, we instead had a mild-mannered, smiling diplomatic dude whose only job was to represent America and not screw up? Man, we need to get ourselves a powerless King, we'd look way better.
Yeah but then you'd have Prime Minister Paul Ryan.
I know you're trying to describe that as a bad thing, but that would still be far preferable to President Trump.
-
I like the monarchy as it is now. They're a head of state with no real power who can basically present a nice public "face" for the UK and the Commonwealth to the outside world. They're basically Britain's PR firm, and they're doing great.
Can you imagine how much better we in the US would look if, instead of having the flaming pile of orange-haired shit representing America to the world, we instead had a mild-mannered, smiling diplomatic dude whose only job was to represent America and not screw up? Man, we need to get ourselves a powerless King, we'd look way better.
Yeah but then you'd have Prime Minister Paul Ryan.
I know you're trying to describe that as a bad thing, but that would still be far preferable to President Trump.
Well, the thing about a constitutional monarchy, while it is better so long as most everyone respects the way the system is supposed to work, a Prime Minister has substantially more de facto power than a presidential system's President has de jure (or even both de jure and de facto) power.
Now, if you also ditched the dumpster fire of an electoral system that is FPTP and moved to an actual proportional representation system (hint: preferential ballot systems are not, look at Ireland)...