Disputing the existence of rape culture thereby encouraging it's continued existence to go on unquestioned would be a good start!
Also downplaying the very real threats against female targets of gamergate, like in the very clip you showed!
So, because she questioned some of your talking points, that automatically makes her a traitor to her sex? The fact is, these kinds of things
have to be questioned. As the Chinese say, "genuine gold fears no fire".
While I disagree with her opinions on rape culture, I think she has every right to hold them. There needs to be
legitimate dialogue on rape culture, not merely shouting down anybody who disagrees.
And I love how you refer to them as "targets", when GamerGate is trying to focus on more important things than dishonest ideologues and people who make shitty indie games.
But you like this sort of stuff Paragon, arguing about who has the worse individuals-because it detracts from the supreme amount of suck that Gamergate has as a movement and what it stands for.
That's what you've been trying to do since you started this thread!
Accusing a consumer revolt of being "full of suck". How progressive of you. GamerGate stands for ethics. What's so objectionable about that?
And how "full of suck" is GamerGate?
We're so full of suck that we donated tens of thousands of dollars to help women make video games.
We're so full of suck that we exposed ideological bias in Wikipedia.
We're so full of suck that we police twitter for harassment from
our own side.
We're so full of suck that we are completely willing to engage our opponents in legitimate dialogue.
We're so full of suck that an amazing amount of the media feels threatened by us.
