Who's "our"?
You'll disown any individual the moment they go south, so who the hell is this "our" you are talking about?
I mean GamerGate as a whole.
Also, I can't help but notice the fact that you said the opposition Anita got meant she was on to something, while the opposition GamerGate gets is used as evidence that we're wrong.
Where and when?
Also it pays to keep in mind the type of opposition, not all opposition is equal. Opposition to Gamergate has been in the form of the media reporting on harassment, opposition to Anita has been in the form of discussions about Anita devolving into examples of Anita's Irony and discussion of feminism devolving into examples of more general examples of Lewis's Law.
Oh yes, because GamerGate has suffered nothing except the media waving its finger at us.
http://gamergateharassment.tumblr.com/And I love how you try to excuse a double standard... with a double standard. It could very easily be adapted into "comments on an article about GamerGate justify why we need GamerGate".
A website was started on the internet, revolutionary!
You claim that gamergate "as a whole" which like Soylent Green is people isn't losing any PR battles. Aside from Christina spruiking for you on telly which PR battles have you won, specifically?
What about the advertisers leaving Gawker?
Your attempts to censor your critics are a PR victory?
Gawker is still up, if anything Gamergate made it more popular.
I can't believe you're cheering on a company that fails to pay its interns.
And we're not trying to "censor" them, we're just trying to make sure they face the consequences of their actions.
It's not easy going up against Gawker, but we're making some progress. This, combined with the lawsuits they're facing from both their unpaid interns and Hulk Hogan, is going to deal them a serious blow.
