Guest verified continues to amaze me....
"Actually, I've proven irrefutably that evolutionists themselves admit evolution hasn't been proven."
I guess the criteria for "irrefutable proof" is that he thinks it is. No matter that he completely failed to convince me of that, since I was able to figure out pretty quickly that the only two examples he gave me of such a thing were quote-mines. Kinda like earlier in the conversation when he said, about some point that he'd been arguing, "we've already established that".....no, WE didn't establish a damn thing, you just think you did.
Oh, now I found it, he said "we've already established that there is no proof of evolution". Which of course, brings up the fact that science doesn't "prove" a damn thing. But, no, he continues to go on about "proof" of this and that. Apparently, in the course of getting that science degree of his, the fundamental nature of how science works was never covered. Since he also thinks that science consists of starting with assumptions and conclusions....at least that's what I assume he meant when he was talking about Christian scientists who "did their science from the Bible" or however he put it.