This isn't bad at all for a first conlang (or a conlang at all for that matter)! I like it. I really like the verb system because it makes aspectual distinctions that English doesn't mark, and it does not distinguish between the simple/gnomic and progressive aspects, which is an uncommon distinction that English borrowed from the Celtic languages. Conlangers seem to have a tendency to copy the English system (which is cross-linguistically bizarre) or the system of whatever their native language is, especially first-time conlangers, but you do a good job avoiding this.
Page 1 has a couple of minor typos: "powerful warriors, tigers to make a caste of laborers and farmers to suuport that army, and leopards to make a race a household servants for themselves." There's an extra "u" in "support," and shouldn't that second "a" be "of"?
Page 2: Very nice conscript! Phonology looks good. You should mark the length distinction of the vowels on your IPA vowel chart: you can mark long (small) vowels with "ˑ", extra-long (large) vowels with "ː", and leave short (extra small) vowels unmarked. The contrast between /a/ and /æ/ confused me until I got to the next page, since that contrast would be weird without an additional distinction in length.
Page 4: Is there any particular language you modeled this stress pattern after? Just curious. It looked complicated and odd at first (though this isn't a human language), but it actually feels natural when I tried saying the words.
Page 6: Technical term for this is "generic plural," but eh, what's good enough for Tolkien is good enough for me.
Page 7: Technical term for the "compound" form is "partitive."
Page 8: I'd call the regular pronoun forms the "nominative case" and the L forms the "oblique case" because that seems to be how they function.
Page 14 has a minor typo: "Predent" = "Present."
Page 16 has a couple of typos too: "Pasive Participle" = "Passive Participle," "Conjucation Root" = "Conjugation Root." Also, I'd add a few more irregular verbs. Cross-linguistically, basic verbs strongly tend to be somewhat irregular except in isolating and strongly agglutinative languages: the copula and existential (both "to be" in English, but they to be separate in non-Indo-European languages), to do, to go, to come, to have, to get, to take, etc.
I gotta go run some errands now, but I'll look over the rest of it when I get back.