0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Oh and take a look at the picture in the artical. If that's what the kid usually wears, someone needs to get their eyes checked. That's not "female apparel" at all. It's a kooky ass shirt for sure but so not "female apparel".
I'd be more sympathetic if people here didn't act like they knew what they were saying when they were saying something very much wrong.
Commenter Brendan Rizzo is an American (still living there) who really, really hates America. He used to make posts defending his country from anti-American attacks but got fed up with it all.
Quote from: ironbite on May 14, 2012, 01:48:02 amOh and take a look at the picture in the artical. If that's what the kid usually wears, someone needs to get their eyes checked. That's not "female apparel" at all. It's a kooky ass shirt for sure but so not "female apparel".This. I've known straight kids who have worn more out there shirts than that. If that's what the principle thinks of as "femine" clothing, then he doesn't have a damn clue.
Quote from: TGRwulf on May 14, 2012, 10:20:22 amQuote from: ironbite on May 14, 2012, 01:48:02 amOh and take a look at the picture in the artical. If that's what the kid usually wears, someone needs to get their eyes checked. That's not "female apparel" at all. It's a kooky ass shirt for sure but so not "female apparel".This. I've known straight kids who have worn more out there shirts than that. If that's what the principle thinks of as "femine" clothing, then he doesn't have a damn clue.I don't see how a D3admau5 shirt is feminine anyway. I don't even see how it's weird.
Quote from: MadCatTLX on May 14, 2012, 10:35:59 amQuote from: TGRwulf on May 14, 2012, 10:20:22 amQuote from: ironbite on May 14, 2012, 01:48:02 amOh and take a look at the picture in the artical. If that's what the kid usually wears, someone needs to get their eyes checked. That's not "female apparel" at all. It's a kooky ass shirt for sure but so not "female apparel".This. I've known straight kids who have worn more out there shirts than that. If that's what the principle thinks of as "femine" clothing, then he doesn't have a damn clue.I don't see how a D3admau5 shirt is feminine anyway. I don't even see how it's weird.It's pink and the principal does not seem to have a clue
Quote from: kefkaownsall on May 14, 2012, 10:46:33 amQuote from: MadCatTLX on May 14, 2012, 10:35:59 amQuote from: TGRwulf on May 14, 2012, 10:20:22 amQuote from: ironbite on May 14, 2012, 01:48:02 amOh and take a look at the picture in the artical. If that's what the kid usually wears, someone needs to get their eyes checked. That's not "female apparel" at all. It's a kooky ass shirt for sure but so not "female apparel".This. I've known straight kids who have worn more out there shirts than that. If that's what the principle thinks of as "femine" clothing, then he doesn't have a damn clue.I don't see how a D3admau5 shirt is feminine anyway. I don't even see how it's weird.It's pink and the principal does not seem to have a clueLooking at the picture I see a camera guy wearing pink, but the kid's D3admau5 shirt looks red to me.
How did the thugs not get in trouble for throwing rocks?
Quote from: Lexikon on May 14, 2012, 10:27:03 amHow did the thugs not get in trouble for throwing rocks?Because their religion says it's okay.
Personally I am all for the stun gun. My only concern is that they tend to be single shot weapons. In a group bullying situation the ones not stunned can easily gang up on and do some real damage to the poor kid. Perhaps some mace would be better. It handles large groups more effectively.
Pardon the interruption, good sir/lady; there are aspects of your behavior that I find quite unbecoming, and I must insist most strenuously that I be permitted to assist in resolving these behaviors through the repeated high-velocity cranial introduction of particularly firm building materials.
GIVE ME KNOWLEDGE OR I WILL PUT A CAP IN YO ASS!
Quote from: Sylvana on May 14, 2012, 04:07:38 amPersonally I am all for the stun gun. My only concern is that they tend to be single shot weapons. In a group bullying situation the ones not stunned can easily gang up on and do some real damage to the poor kid. Perhaps some mace would be better. It handles large groups more effectively.Or a mace...
Here's some hope:http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-05-15/indiana-teen-bullying-protest/54982074/1I'm thinking of going to the ACLU website & email them a link to the original article & perhaps suggest they volunteer to help this young man.
"While the district does not condone bullying, it also does not allow weapons to be brought on our school campuses for any reason," Bewley said. "Students who violate this rule will be held accountable."