Author Topic: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad  (Read 15046 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DiscoBerry

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1081
    • Has the Hadron Collider Destroyed the Earth Yet?
Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« on: September 27, 2012, 02:53:57 pm »
This is NOT a Dave Chappelle sketch.  It is pertinent and hilarious. 

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK7QfCEEiBs" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK7QfCEEiBs</a>

Offline Damen

  • That's COMMODORE SPLATMASTER Damen, Briber of Mods
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Gender: Male
  • The Dark Sex God
    • John Damen's Photography
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2012, 03:05:44 pm »
I love that motherfucker. ;D
"Fear my .45"

"If the liberties of the American people are ever destroyed, they will fall by the hands of the clergy" ~ Marquis De Lafayette

'Till Next Time,
~John Damen

Offline Rabbit of Caerbannog

  • He's Got Great Big Teeth and the Holy Hand Grenade!
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2919
  • Gender: Male
  • Hit me with your best shot! Fire awaaaay!
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2012, 04:25:41 pm »
Obama 2012: Does He Look Like a Bitch?

Offline Fpqxz

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
  • Gender: Male
  • Generic forum poster #666
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2012, 04:37:50 pm »
Paid for by Jewish Council for Education and Research (that what the video says at the end).

I find it interesting that no matter how bullish the GOP tries to be on Israel, more Jews still vote Democrat.  Not that I can blame them.
Read some real news:  Allgov.com, JURIST

Quote
Step down Mr. and Mrs. Politically Correct.
It's so easy to be "punk" and "aware" living at home.
You can't change shit, you're too self-righteous;
you're the bigots you flaunt to loathe.
--Thought Industry, Boil

Offline VirtualStranger

  • Blinded with Science
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 946
  • Gender: Male
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2012, 05:09:15 pm »
I'VE HAD IT WITH THESE MOTHERFUCKING REPUBLICANS IN THESE MOTHERFUCKING PLAINS


Uncensored version here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hDTT1yRNsFE

Offline Her3tiK

  • Suffers in Sanity
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1940
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to Swim
    • HeretiK Productions
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2012, 12:32:31 am »
Obama 2012: Does He Look Like a Bitch?
Win. So hard.
Her3tik, you have groupies.
Ego: +5

There are a number of ways, though my favourite is simply to take them by surprise. They're just walking down the street, minding their own business when suddenly, WHACK! Penis to the face.

Offline niam2023

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 4212
  • Gender: Male
  • The Forum Chad
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2012, 01:32:19 am »
...I am invigorated.

That ad, it just...did what I guess it was supposed to do. Wake me up.

I am gonna do something for the election. Something. Maybe raise money for Obama. I gotta do something. Mitt Romney is more dangerous than I thought.
Living Life, Lifting, Waiting for Summer

Offline Askold

  • Definitely not hiding a dark secret.
  • Global Moderator
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 8351
  • Gender: Male
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2012, 02:23:54 am »
I have said this before and will say it again:

USA in general is insane, US politics is even crazier.


...Although sometimes it is crazy-awesome.
No matter what happens, no matter what my last words may end up being, I want everyone to claim that they were:
"If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."
Aww, you guys rock. :)  I feel the love... and the pitchforks and torches.  Tingly!

Offline RavynousHunter

  • Master Thief
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 8093
  • Gender: Male
  • A man of no consequence.
    • My Twitter
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2012, 02:28:20 am »
Pssh, I'm gonna go right up to that cracker and piss on his shoes.

What?  If he didn't want my piss on his shoes, he should've run faster.
Quote from: Bra'tac
Life for the sake of life means nothing.

Offline TheL

  • The Cock Teasing Teacher
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2219
  • Gender: Female
  • Fly like cheese sticks.
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2012, 04:21:54 am »
This is exactly the sort of message we need.  Democrats can't afford to get complacent.

We all need to get out there and VOTE.  Not just for Obama, but in state and local elections too!
Quote from: ladyrenae
You there. The creepy person who decided I was supporting their position. Stop it.

"Half the reason that I like foreign music is because I can kid myself that "Shake dat ass" is more poetic in Hindi."
--Sanda

Move every 'sig.'  For great justice!

Offline largeham

  • Dirty Pinko
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1326
  • Gender: Male
  • The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2012, 05:00:47 am »
...I am invigorated.

That ad, it just...did what I guess it was supposed to do. Wake me up.

I am gonna do something for the election. Something. Maybe raise money for Obama. I gotta do something. Mitt Romney is more dangerous than I thought.

This is exactly the sort of message we need.  Democrats can't afford to get complacent.

We all need to get out there and VOTE.  Not just for Obama, but in state and local elections too!

Dear God, no. Obama is not the lesser of two evils. He has fucked over the American workers and poor just as much Bush did and Romney would. I am generally loathe to quote myself, but I will:

Boo hoo, Obama is so left -wing, he bends over backwards for the Republicans and is in the Democrat party. Didn't you know that liberals voted for him? And the CPUSA! Gosh, he must be a lefty, almost FDR, Ghandi and Marx rolled into one.
He doesn't hire neo-liberals.
He would never attack Medicare and Social Security.
He is a big friend to whistleblowers.
Totally not against people working for free.
Wants to hold bankers accountable.
Really, the bankers hate him.
Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers are not on his economic team. Not at all.

This is aside from the usual support for Israel, American help in crushing revolts in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, the support given in Libya, expanding the war in Afghanistan and increasing drone strikes in Pakistan.

For the whole lesser evil argument, things were actually damned good under Nixon, real wages peaked, almost all troops left Vietnam and the EPA was passed.

My Little Comrade
My Little Comrade
Ah ah ah aaaaah!
(My Little Comrade)
I used to wonder what socialism could be!
(My Little Comrade)
Until you all shared its materialist dialectic with me!

Offline Hades

  • Balsiest Motherfucker Present
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1082
  • Gender: Male
  • This is a ride, not a fight
    • Fruits of Apathy
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2012, 06:33:16 am »
Good message, and Sam is the man.

Not a fan of involving kids in political ads, though. I find it gross when repubs do it, and I'd be a hypocrite to not find it gross on my end of the spectrum.
22:22 <SugarFreeJazz> the time for hats is now

"I don't know what it is, but nothing makes me hard like the thought of Megan Fox without any skin." - Existentialist Goofy

Offline Smurfette Principle

  • Will Blind You With Library Science!
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1639
  • Gender: Female
  • Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo.
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2012, 09:47:40 am »
...I am invigorated.

That ad, it just...did what I guess it was supposed to do. Wake me up.

I am gonna do something for the election. Something. Maybe raise money for Obama. I gotta do something. Mitt Romney is more dangerous than I thought.

This is exactly the sort of message we need.  Democrats can't afford to get complacent.

We all need to get out there and VOTE.  Not just for Obama, but in state and local elections too!

Dear God, no. Obama is not the lesser of two evils. He has fucked over the American workers and poor just as much Bush did and Romney would. I am generally loathe to quote myself, but I will:

Boo hoo, Obama is so left -wing, he bends over backwards for the Republicans and is in the Democrat party. Didn't you know that liberals voted for him? And the CPUSA! Gosh, he must be a lefty, almost FDR, Ghandi and Marx rolled into one.
He doesn't hire neo-liberals.
He would never attack Medicare and Social Security.
He is a big friend to whistleblowers.
Totally not against people working for free.
Wants to hold bankers accountable.
Really, the bankers hate him.
Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers are not on his economic team. Not at all.

This is aside from the usual support for Israel, American help in crushing revolts in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, the support given in Libya, expanding the war in Afghanistan and increasing drone strikes in Pakistan.

For the whole lesser evil argument, things were actually damned good under Nixon, real wages peaked, almost all troops left Vietnam and the EPA was passed.

Yes, because Nixon was attempting to appeal to young and liberal voters. Romney is not doing that. He has written off 47% of the country as not worth campaigning for, and I can guarantee you that he knows he can't attract young people at all because of his stance on student loans and women's health care.

By saying that he is not the lesser of two evils, you are saying that Romney is a better choice. Are you seriously suggesting that a racist, homophobic, sexist, privileged rich white dude who doesn't have any clear policies on anything (except, of course, fucking over the middle class) is a better choice than a right-of-center Democrat? Is that seriously what you are suggesting? Because I'm not seeing any evidence for that whatsoever.

Offline largeham

  • Dirty Pinko
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1326
  • Gender: Male
  • The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2012, 10:44:42 am »
Romney is not doing that. He has written off 47% of the country as not worth campaigning for, and I can guarantee you that he knows he can't attract young people at all because of his stance on student loans and women's health care.

It doesn't matter, Obama will campaign to attract non-white and poor voters, it doesn't mean he will actually do anything to help them.

Quote
By saying that he is not the lesser of two evils, you are saying that Romney is a better choice.

It certainly does not. Saying X is not better than Y does not say Y is better than X.

Quote
Are you seriously suggesting that a racist, homophobic, sexist, privileged rich white dude who doesn't have any clear policies on anything (except, of course, fucking over the middle class) is a better choice than a right-of-center Democrat? Is that seriously what you are suggesting? Because I'm not seeing any evidence for that whatsoever.

Right of centre? This is what you describe someone who unashamedly supports the bankers, is more than happy to chum around with neo-liberals, attacks unions and workers (not that American unions are any good) and destroy social security? Just because Obama isn't as openly sexist and homophobic as Mitt Romney doesn't mean he has done anything good. Wow, he removed DADT.
A) The Democrats are losing support, which is also why he came out in support of same sex marriage rights though he hasn't done anything, and so they need to regain support.

B) The American military is facing a recruitment crisis

What's that about women's rights? A shit ton of states have passed laws attacking abortion and contraception rights? Especially in his first two years, where Obama held a majority in both the House of Reps and the Senate? But then, defer for the first two years and then blame everything on the Republicans. Easy.

I'm not seeing how Obama is any good. At all really.
Also, the idea of voting for the lesser evil is bullshit. Specifically for America, the Democrats are not a social democratic party, they are a liberal bourgeois party. There is a difference between the Democrats and the Labour/Labor/Social Democratic/Socialist parties of Europe and Australia. The latter, no matter how shitty and terrible they are, have some connection with the working class (though that is not to say that I would endorse them). Also, voting to keep the Republicans out allows the Democrats to move as far to the right as they want, they can simply point to the Republican menace to gain left-wing support, and then justify any rightward shift as a means to gain votes.

My Little Comrade
My Little Comrade
Ah ah ah aaaaah!
(My Little Comrade)
I used to wonder what socialism could be!
(My Little Comrade)
Until you all shared its materialist dialectic with me!

Offline Fpqxz

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
  • Gender: Male
  • Generic forum poster #666
Re: Samuel L. Jackson Obama Ad
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2012, 11:24:17 am »
Holy shit, this makes two things I agree with Largeham about:  The USA doesn't have a real left anymore (and hasn't had one for a while), and Richard Nixon was actually one of the better Republican presidents we've had (and would be considered liberal by today's standards).
Read some real news:  Allgov.com, JURIST

Quote
Step down Mr. and Mrs. Politically Correct.
It's so easy to be "punk" and "aware" living at home.
You can't change shit, you're too self-righteous;
you're the bigots you flaunt to loathe.
--Thought Industry, Boil