And now for some good old-fashioned double standards:
https://archive.is/qZjooCongratulations, Ms. Stone, you made me side with Sarah Palin against you.
This article attempts to make a distinction between Josh Duggar molesting his sisters, and Lena Dunham molesting
her sister. It portrays Lena's interest in her sister's body as nothing more than childlike curiosity, claiming she merely looked at her younger sister's vagina when she was seven.
The problem? That's not true. The author fails to mention the "child-like curiosity" Lena Dunham had for her one year old baby sister lasted until Lena was
17 years old. She would bribe her sister into her bed, and
masturbate in front of her. And the way she described it... it's even more sickening. She was literally getting sexual pleasure from forcing her sister to beg to sleep with her. She 'put on a big show of saying no'. This is some disgusting shit man. Calling it anything other than predatory is dishonest.
But then, why tell the entire truth about Dunham's 10 year history of creepy behavior with her younger sister when you can only talk about the time she was 7 and just showing her natural, innocent, and childlike curiosity?
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Duggar. What he did was despicable. My problem is that the media refuses to give Lena the same treatment, and that they (rightly) denounce people defending Duggar, while at the same time defending Dunham.
The only thing I agree with the author on: It's not a fucking competition. There is no gold medal for the world's most prolific kid fucker. It doesn't matter who's "worse", they're both disgusting excuses for human beings.