Yes but you missed the first part:
Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. According to the law, rape is sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.
It then goes on to say there is an offence of a man being made to sexually penetrate another without consent. So in her country it is an offence to penetrate someone (anyone) sexually with 'a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object'. There is further an offence where a woman forces a man to penetrate her against her will. So your point about rape being nonconsensual penetration with a penis is a bit sterile given that it is a different offence.
Likewise lots of places don't have what you in the US call 'statutory rape' but that does not mean it is legal, it is just called a different offence like 'unlawful carnal knowledge'. Now when I was at high school, the definition of rape in Queensland had been expanded to include digital or object rape but 'unlawful carnal knowledge' was restricted purely to men penetrating women. So that for instance it would be a criminal offence for an 18 year old man to have penetrative sex with a 15 year old girl but not an offence for a 45 year old woman to have sex with a 14 year old boy. This was not because 90s Queensland was very 'woke'.
Ok let me try again, why do you feel the need to say 'not all men' or 'what about men' ? When was the last time you felt the need to say 'not all women' or 'what about women' . Or what about crackers?
1. What first part? I don't see any first part. Are we looking at the same thing?
2. I was already aware that it was still a crime.
But there's still a clear and harmful double standard.
3a. Let me demonstrate:
"Ugh, women suck! Fuck those dishonest bitches!"
"Not all women are like that."
"But too many of them are. Decent women know I'm not talking about them."
Reverse the genders, and you have your answer. "Not all men" is usually a response to men being generalized as bad in some way. You might as well complain about a Muslim responding to blatant Islamophobia by saying not all Muslims are violent religious fanatics.
3b. Because men are more likely to be homeless, more likely to commit suicide, and more likely to be victims of violent crime. Because rape and abuse are still widely seen as crimes that are perpetrated by men against women, to the point of being termed "violence against women". Because female victims are often implicitly or even explicitly said to be more worthy of compassion than male ones. Because there's discrimination against men in the legal system, including laws that explicitly discriminate against men. Because despite all this, there are lots of people who call men "privileged" and use that as an excuse to dismiss or belittle men who want these problems addressed.
