If you are going to bring up "news" from a racist (and fake) news site is it too much to ask that you actually read what they have written in the article before getting worked up by the title? Also, when it turns out that this particular site actually gives a link to the news site from which they got their story (which is also racist but doesn't support the claims of the second site which had decided to turn the claims up to 11.) to follow those links to the original source (which is not racist and doesn't support the claims that either of the two previously mentioned sites made) and see what actually happened?
...Furthermore when I do the work for you and debunk everything you had implied, instead of admitting that you were acting too rashly, why on Earth do you defend yourself by saying "but look at the title! They wouldn't make up something like that, would they?" When I have SPECIFICALLY debunked the title already?