Author Topic: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?  (Read 5421 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SpaceProg

  • What you read is what you get.
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • Nocturnal
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2012, 12:49:08 am »
I don't remember it being so crazy-go-nuts either.  Though I DO believe the internet has played a large part in stoking fires that otherwise would have smouldered quietly.

Offline RavynousHunter

  • Master Thief
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 8108
  • Gender: Male
  • A man of no consequence.
    • My Twitter
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2012, 12:56:09 am »
Recent right-wing insanity: GIFT in action.
Quote from: Bra'tac
Life for the sake of life means nothing.

Offline Fpqxz

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
  • Gender: Male
  • Generic forum poster #666
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2012, 01:01:00 am »
I can say with certainty that it was nowhere this insane. This madness seems to have only come about in the last decade or so. If they were this mad back in the day, I never would have been a Repub.

I respectfully disagree.  I think the level of craziness we are seeing today was already present under Clinton, and in fact had been present in some form in U.S. politics for a long time, even prior to WWII.  A lot of the same criticisms Obama is facing now were thrown at FDR and his New Deal (e.g. that he was a socialist, fascist, etc.).

Remember also that the Republican Revolution of 1994 and the Oklahoma City bombing of 1995 both happened during Clinton's first term.

The point was not to uphold the law. The point was to headhunt a political opponent. And they were willing to outright abuse their power of impeachment to do it.

He was IMPEACHED for nothing. The Republicans (and even some Democrats, to their utter shame) abused their most serious power. They've done nothing like that for Obama.

I agree with Lt. Fred on this one.  The Republicans hated Clinton at least as much as they hate Obama, though for slightly different reasons.  The only difference is, this time the GOP has yet to find sufficient ammunition to go after the Obama administration.

When did adultery become illegal?
I thought it was.

Just as a point of law, adultery is prosecutable in the military under Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice under certain circumstances, and is usually grounds for divorce in most states.  It is not, to my knowledge, a prosecutable offense under the civilian criminal laws of the United States or any state or territory, and has not been for some time.
Read some real news:  Allgov.com, JURIST

Quote
Step down Mr. and Mrs. Politically Correct.
It's so easy to be "punk" and "aware" living at home.
You can't change shit, you're too self-righteous;
you're the bigots you flaunt to loathe.
--Thought Industry, Boil

Distind

  • Guest
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2012, 06:39:13 am »
The crazy was there, but back in the early 90s not every nutbar in his mountain cabin could have internet access. Now they can, and it seems like they do.

One of the things people credit the internet with, that whole bit about forming communities based on commonalities not found locally. It isn't all roses when you realize the psychotics get a go at it too.

Offline Old Viking

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
  • Gender: Male
  • Occasionally peevish
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2012, 04:32:50 pm »
Infants in their infancy, adults in their adultery ...

Not exactly pertinent, but I thought I'd toss it out there.
I am an old man, and I've seen many problems, most of which never happened.

Offline SpaceProg

  • What you read is what you get.
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • Nocturnal
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2012, 05:32:56 pm »
Recent right-wing insanity: GIFT in action.

Guy In Fancy Turban

Gene Influencing for Flatulence Termination

Get In the Fucking TARDIS

...?

Saturn500

  • Guest
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2012, 05:35:30 pm »
Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory

http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19/

Offline Cerim Treascair

  • My Love Is Lunar
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3092
  • Gender: Male
  • Get me my arbalest... explosive bolts, please.
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2012, 05:37:47 pm »
Recent right-wing insanity: GIFT in action.

Guy In Fancy Turban

Gene Influencing for Flatulence Termination

Get In the Fucking TARDIS

...?

Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory, Proggy.

As defined by the Penny Arcade webcomic:  Average person + Anonyimity + Internet = Fuckwad
There is light and darkness in the world, to be sure.  However, there's no harm to be had in walking in the shade or shadows.

Formerly Priestling

"I don't give a fuck about race...I'm white, I'm American, but that shit don't matter.  I'm human."

Saturn500

  • Guest
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2012, 05:39:52 pm »
A bit late there, Priestling.

Offline Cerim Treascair

  • My Love Is Lunar
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3092
  • Gender: Male
  • Get me my arbalest... explosive bolts, please.
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2012, 05:43:14 pm »
by two minutes and seventeen seconds, Saturn.  I was catching up on the thread.
There is light and darkness in the world, to be sure.  However, there's no harm to be had in walking in the shade or shadows.

Formerly Priestling

"I don't give a fuck about race...I'm white, I'm American, but that shit don't matter.  I'm human."

Offline SpaceProg

  • What you read is what you get.
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • Nocturnal
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2012, 05:45:42 pm »
Thanks you two.  That would have been my next guess.  Really... :p

Offline tempus

  • Bishop
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2012, 12:55:24 am »
Kinda close.   The far right has a shrill, hysterical edge to it that it didn't seem to have in the 90s (okay, MORE shrill and hysterical, I mean), and the obstructionism is even greater, but yeah.  Chalk it up to the fact that the president is near, the religious hysteria is much greater, and the average age of the religious right is "ancient."   

But...yeah.  It was a pale, watered-down version of the sheer psychotic batfuckery that we're experiencing now, but it was sort of close.  If Obama wins in November, look for them to start impeachment proceedings at some point regardless of what he (a) did or (b) didn't do.  Everything old is new again.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2012, 12:59:18 am by tempus »
Congratulations.  You found Ronald Reagan. He’s living in each and every one of you.  Just waiting to gnaw his way out of your chest and skitter off into the ventilation ducts.

--Neckfucker

That shape...that figure...those curves...god damn the weighted companion cube has never looked so good!

--Anonymous

Los Angeles is a city of brick, steel, concrete, and asphalt. There's no room for cows.

--CommanderCoffee

Offline TheBurningOne

  • Neonate
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2012, 04:28:11 am »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UwJYfTC9Hw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UwJYfTC9Hw</a>
« Last Edit: September 25, 2012, 04:31:31 am by TheBurningOne »

Offline R. U. Sirius

  • He Who Must Be Smooched By Cute FSTDT Forumgirls
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2896
  • Gender: Male
  • Just look at me. Who could distrust this face?
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2012, 09:36:55 am »
Kinda close.   The far right has a shrill, hysterical edge to it that it didn't seem to have in the 90s (okay, MORE shrill and hysterical, I mean), and the obstructionism is even greater, but yeah.  Chalk it up to the fact that the president is near, the religious hysteria is much greater, and the average age of the religious right is "ancient."   

But...yeah.  It was a pale, watered-down version of the sheer psychotic batfuckery that we're experiencing now, but it was sort of close.  If Obama wins in November, look for them to start impeachment proceedings at some point regardless of what he (a) did or (b) didn't do.  Everything old is new again.

Near where I live, one person has a sign in their van window that says "Yes we can...impeach Obama!"

This was put up about a month after his initial inauguration.

Yeah... I think I'll go curl up in a corner and weep for America now.
http://www.gofundme.com/kw5o78
My GoFundMe campaign. Donations are greatly appreciated.

http://imgur.com/user/RUSirius1/submitted
My Imgur account. Upvotes always appreciated

If you look at it logically, cannibalism has great potential to simultaneously solve our overpopulation and food shortage problems.

Offline Bezron

  • a mysterious riddled spicy burrito wrapped enigma...stuck in some hot chick's colon dreaming of fanginas
  • Pope
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
  • Gender: Male
Re: Was the right this rabid under Clinton?
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2012, 11:12:45 am »
Kinda close.   The far right has a shrill, hysterical edge to it that it didn't seem to have in the 90s (okay, MORE shrill and hysterical, I mean), and the obstructionism is even greater, but yeah.  Chalk it up to the fact that the president is near, the religious hysteria is much greater, and the average age of the religious right is "ancient."   

But...yeah.  It was a pale, watered-down version of the sheer psychotic batfuckery that we're experiencing now, but it was sort of close.  If Obama wins in November, look for them to start impeachment proceedings at some point regardless of what he (a) did or (b) didn't do.  Everything old is new again.

What everyone is missing is the fact that Rush Limbaugh was a new thing back in the Clinton days.  Yes, there was right wing radio/talk shows, but it was largely relegated to AM stations and only listened to by the super crazy conspiracy theorists.  Fox News at that time was very subtle about being the media arm of the GOP.  In the time since, there has been an explosion on that type of thing, which has only served to whip the crazies into a frenzy and infect supposedly "normal" conservatives.