Because why engage with your opponents when you can just spout the same stupid catchphrase over and over?
On an unrelated note:
It is also a rejection of dogmatic sexual taboos imposed on people by Christianity and the patriarchy, an embracing of free love, an embracing of the idea that all love is love, a rejection of feeling shame about sexual desires, a rejection of straight sexuality, and a public embracing of pride in a sexual identity that the old morality prohibits.
For the record, this is about an incident where a prepubescent "drag kid" danced on stage at a gay strip club where grown men threw money at him. Some taboos exist for good reasons.
That's not to say there's no bullshit on the other side of this controversy:
Thank you for understanding what I was saying.
I was saying this boy’s abuse is born out of and a continuation of the “sexual revolution” and, more specifically, its child the “homosexual rights” movement. This child’s abuse is achieving all of the political and social aims of those movement and will be defended along the same lines as those other movements.
Seems like even when authoritarian trad douches complain about things worth complaining about, they just can't resist getting cracks in at their favorite punching bags.