Burden of proof? Jesus if you want me to adult you're gonna have to stop being so hilarious.
Look at the big philosopher who's proved the NRA and racism don't go together because he found a black guy who supports them. Teh logics it is teh impeccables.
I'll be 'adult' when you come back with a grown up argument, junior.
Well, you can't prove a negative. So it's up to you to prove that the NRA is racist. I will admit that the picture was kind of a knee-jerk reaction, though.
Oh, and did you really just pull a "no u"? I'd be careful about the immaturity accusations if I were you. Both because it makes you look hypocritical, and because it could be construed as racism.
It could be construed as racism? Whoo hoo, I'd have you as a fanboy because you'd be right there backing everything I say for the sake of your precious centrism! Actually that'd be not very useful as you can't argue your way out of a wet paper bag. Regardless, as a threat it's as pitiful as "I won't take you seriously"-nobody asked.
And I owe you personally nothing, there is no "burden" as I'm not obligated to give you shit. I know you want to have an endless sealion argument where you'll deny there was ever any racisms in the NRA ever no matter what anyone throws at you but you don't want to "debate" because your interested in the truth. You want to find a dead horse to whip to bring "balance" back to the forum by defending reactionaries, racists and sexists but not anybody left of Hillary Clinton while everyone else collectively groans.
But balance is important, very important so are counterexamples.
Here's a Rabbi who digs Hitler.Clearly any suggestion that the Nazis were anti semitic is monstrously unfair and wrong, look a Jewish guy thinks Adolf is neat! Mind blown.